DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Forest Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Forest Management Plan CITY OF EL CERRITO URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN City of El Cerrito Urban Forest Management Plan May 2007 Prepared for: City of El Cerrito Parks and Recreation Department Monica Kortz Jerry Bradshaw Bruce King Prepared by: Vallier Design Associates, Inc. 210 Washington Avenue, Suite G Point Richmond, California 94801 MacNair & Associates P. O. Box 1150 Glen Ellen, California 95442 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.........Executive Summary 9.........Introduction 11........Benefi ts of a Successful Urban Forest Creating a Sense of Place Balancing Environmental Impacts Economic Vitality 17......Elements of a Successful Urban Forest Intelligent Planning and Management Community and Government Commitment Consistent and Suffi cient Funding Excellent Maintenance 19......Strategies for a Successful Urban Forest Existing Conditions Goals and Strategies 25......Street Tree Inventory Analysis Findings 31......Street Tree Recommendations 33......Appendix 01: Tree Selection & Care Guidelines 37......Appendix 02: Tree List A 59......Appendix 03: Tree List B 67......Appendix 04: Tree List C 73....Appendix 05: Tree List D 99....Appendix 06: Tree List E 101....Appendix 07: Tree List F 109....Appendix 08: Urban Forestry Software 111....Appendix 09: References EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Urban forests grown without foresight or planning can This plan outlines the social, environmental, and create high maintenance requirements and cost burdens. economic benefi ts that a vital urban forest is expected A well-managed urban forest, however, is economically and to provide and establishes these benefi ts as the standard environmentally sustainable and a highly-visible source of of performance for the City of El Cerrito’s urban forest. community pride. In order to meet this standard the City’s urban forestry effort The informational basis of the Urban Forestry Ordinances: must provide: intelligent planning Urban Forest Management Plan · Require a minimum of 50% and management, community are two inventories of trees within canopy cover at maturity in new and government commitment, the City of El Cerrito. In 1991, an and renovated parking lots. consistent funding, and excellent inventory of all street trees in the maintenance public right-of-way was conducted · Require selection of tree species by Tom Pehrson and Associates. from the City’s approved tree Specifi cally, the City of El Cerrito During the winter of 2005, Vallier list and in accordance with the must: Design Associates, Inc and MacNair Urban Forest Management Plan and Associates revisited the trees guidelines. Support the urban forestry effort, and tree locations identifi ed in the both fi nancially and politically, · Require the installation of 1991 inventory; gathering updated at all levels of City government automatic, regular irrigation in all data for each. In 2003, Vallier by providing consistent funding planting areas. Design Associates, Inc. conducted and enacting urban forestry an inventory of all trees, landscape · Require the installation of ordinances. plants and turf grass areas in the structural soil around planting City’s public recreation facilities. areas located in hardscape areas. Provide excellent, consistent maintenance to new and existing The plans, used in tandem, gave us · Require permanent maintenance urban forest trees. a snapshot of existing conditions in by commercial developers and at the urban forest and are a baseline least a 1-year maintenance period While this plan details practical goals from which to form conclusions for street trees by residential and action strategies for developing and develop an action plan for developers. Maintenance includes an extensive, healthy urban forest, a successful urban forest. Both pest control, pruning and the fundamental key to success of the Street Tree Inventory and fertilization. El Cerrito’s urban forest depends the Landscape Management Plan upon a city-wide commitment to · Develop and adopt a Heritage conclude that the primary cause of proper care—appropriate species Tree Ordinance loss of trees, and declining health in selection, adequate irrigation, existing trees, is a lack of consistent, and professional pruning—of the high-quality maintenance. Many of existing urban forest. El Cerrito’s street trees are suffering from chronic drought stress and G severe pruning. 7 INTRODUCTION El Cerrito’s urban forest development process began with the 2003 City of El Cerrito Landscape Management Plan, which identifi ed four steps to take to develop an effective and sustainable urban forest in El Cerrito. 1. Inventory and assess the existing urban forest. 2. Establish goals and policies for the development and maintenance of an socially, environmentally and economically successful urban forest. 3. Enact and enforce ordinances in support of the urban forest goals and policies. 4. Create a capital improvement plan for the implementation of the urban forest goals and policies. The fi rst step was accomplished through the 2003 Landscape Management Plan, and the 2005 Street Tree Inventory, both prepared by Vallier Design Associates, Inc. The Landscape Management Plan is an inventory and assessment of landscape materials, including trees, in all City-owned recreation sites including parks, public stairways, and the Ohlone Greenway. The Street Tree Inventory provides a full inventory of the street trees on City right-of-ways as well as a practical discussion of the The Urban Forest Management Plan: arboricultural conditions present in · describes the benefi ts a successful the street tree forest. urban forest can provide Together the Landscape Management · outlines the elements necessary Plan and the Street Tree Inventory for an urban forest to provide those provide a baseline description of benefi ts. the conditions found in the City’s · provides the goals and strategies existing urban forest. With this necessary for El Cerrito’s urban forest baseline information as a foundation, to reach this standard of performance. the Urban Forest Management Plan accomplishes the second step. This plan discusses the signifi cant benefi ts that can be provided to a community by a thriving urban forest and the conditions necessary for the urban forest to thrive. The Urban Forest Management Plan then provides the goals and actions necessary to reach this standard from El Cerrito’s existing urban forest conditions. Meeting these goals will require a coordinated city-wide effort, including the enforcement of ordinances and the creation of a capital improvement plan in support of the urban forestry effort. G 9 BENEFITS OF A SUCCESSFUL URBAN FOREST An urban forest is the collection of trees growing within navigation through a city is made possible by a mental map an urban area. Nation-wide, city offi cials and residents built upon visual cues—a mental map that is not a grid of are increasingly recognizing that urban forests are a street names and cardinal directions but rather a series vital component of community health. While urban of interconnected experiences generated by memorable forests planted without foresight or planning create high districts and distinct connections within the urban fabric. maintenance requirements and heavy cost burdens, The urban forest is a powerful tool for establishing a a well-managed urban forest will be economically and city’s organizational legibility. The successful urban environmentally sustainable and a highly forest will, by systematic placement visible source of community pride. Well- of distinctive street tree species and The social benefi ts of an maintained urban forests provide social, distinctive species combinations, identify urban forest include: environmental and economic benefi ts. gateways, paths-of-travel, districts, and · Connection to the natural destinations—orienting travelers within Creating a Sense of Place world the city framework and engendering a City dwellers need strong connections sense of ease. to the natural world, a legible urban · Improved city legibility structure, and a sense of investment · A sense of community An urban forest is fundamentally in the public life of the community in different from a ‘natural’ or rural forest order to overcome the geographic in that it requires constant human care disorientation and social isolation that have resulted from for its survival. With intelligent planning, an urban forest the last century’s rapid increases in urban densifi cation can be designed to invite the necessary care. When and sprawl. A extensive, healthy, thoughtfully developed a community plants trees to create identifi able and urban forest is a subtle and powerful force in addressing loved social places—whether at the large scale of a these issues. neighborhood or the intimate scale of a sidewalk café— An extensive and healthy urban Urban forests also improve community health people become invested in forest provides color, texture, and safety: these places. Not only does and seasonal changes that · Trees in high-density neighborhoods lower this commitment further the soften hard urban edges, create fear-levels, contribute to less violent and survival and success of the a rich aesthetic experience, and aggressive behavior, and encourage better urban forest, it also generates a establish connections to natural neighborhood relationships. larger sense of community and cycles. community identity as residents · School children with ADHD show fewer and city offi cials work together A legible city is easily understood symptoms when they have access to natural to maintain and develop the by a stranger and navigable settings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustaining America's Urban Trees and Forests
    United States Department of SSustainingustaining AAmerica’smerica’s Agriculture Forest Service UUrbanrban TTreesrees andand ForestsForests Northern Research Station State and Private Forestry General Technical DDavidavid J.J. NNowak,owak, SusanSusan M.M. Stein,Stein, PaulaPaula B.B. Randler,Randler, EricEric J.J. GreenGreenfi eeld,ld, Report NRS-62 SSaraara JJ.. CComas,omas, MMaryary AA.. CCarr,arr, aandnd RRalphalph J.J. AligAlig June 2010 A Forests on the Edge Report ABSTRACT Nowak, David J.; Stein, Susan M.; Randler, Paula B.; Greenfi eld, Eric J.; Comas, Sara J.; Carr, Mary A.; Alig, Ralph J. 2010. Sustaining America’s urban trees and forests: a Forests on the Edge report. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-62. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 p. Close to 80 percent of the U.S. population lives in urban areas and depends on the essential ecological, economic, and social benefi ts provided by urban trees and forests. However, the distribution of urban tree cover and the benefi ts of urban forests vary across the United States, as do the challenges of sustaining this important resource. As urban areas expand across the country, the importance of the benefi ts that urban forests provide, as well as the challenges to their conservation and maintenance, will increase. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the current status and benefi ts of America’s urban forests, compare differences in urban forest canopy cover among regions, and discuss challenges facing urban forests and their implications for urban forest management. Key Words: Urban forest, urbanization, land Lisa DeJong The Plain Dealer, Photo: AP management, ecosystem services Urban forests offer aesthetic values and critical services.
    [Show full text]
  • Weston Tree Inventory
    Tree Inventory Summary Report All Phases Town of Weston, Massachusetts October 2019 Prepared for: Town of Weston Department of Public Works Bypass, 190 Boston Post Road Weston, Massachusetts 02493 Prepared by: Davey Resource Group, Inc. 1500 North Mantua Street Kent, Ohio 44240 800-828-8312 Executive Summary The Town of Weston commissioned an inventory and assessment of trees located within public street rights-of-way (ROW). The inventory was conducted in three phases over three years. Understanding an urban forest’s structure, function, and value can promote management decisions that will improve public health and environmental quality. Davey Resource Group, Inc. “DRG” collected and analyzed the inventory data to understand species composition and tree condition, and to generate maintenance recommendations. This report will discuss the health and benefits of the inventoried street tree population along public roads throughout the Town of Weston. Key Findings A total of 15,437 trees were inventoried. The most common species are: Pinus strobus (white pine), 24%; Quercus rubra (red oak), 13%; Acer rubrum (red maple), 9%; Quercus velutina (black oak), 8%; and A. platanoides (Norway maple), 7%. The overall condition of the tree population is Fair. Risk Ratings include: 14,135 Low Risk trees; 1,210 Moderate Risk trees; and 92 High Risk trees. Primary Maintenance recommendations include: 13,625 Tree Cleans and 1,812 Removals. Davey Resource Group i October 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Tree Risk Management: a Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation
    Urban Tree Risk Management: A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area 1992 Folwell Ave. State and Private Forestry St. Paul, MN 55108 NA-TP-03-03 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). Urban Tree Risk Management: A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation Coordinating Author Jill D. Pokorny Plant Pathologist USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry 1992 Folwell Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 NA-TP-03-03 i Acknowledgments Illustrator Kathy Widin Tom T. Dunlap Beth Petroske Julie Martinez President President Graphic Designer (former) Minneapolis, MN Plant Health Associates Canopy Tree Care Minnesota Department of Stillwater, MN Minneapolis, MN Natural Resources Production Editor Barbara McGuinness John Schwandt Tom Eiber Olin Phillips USDA Forest Service, USDA Forest Service Information Specialist Fire Section Manager Northeastern Research Coer d’Alene, ID Minnesota Department of Minnesota Department of Station Natural Resources Natural Resources Drew Todd State Urban Forestry Ed Hayes Mark Platta Reviewers: Coordinator Plant Health Specialist Plant Health Specialist The following people Ohio Department of Minnesota Department of Minnesota Department of generously provided Natural Resources Natural Resources Natural Resources suggestions and reviewed drafts of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forestry Program FIVE YEAR PLAN
    URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM FIVE YEAR PLAN DRAFT 2016 URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • Mayor Kevin L. Falconer • State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) • Community Forestry Advisory Board • Inland Urban Forestry Group • David Graham, Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Mayor’s Office • Mike Hansen, Deputy Chief of Staff & Chief of Policy, Mayor’s Office • Jeff Murphy, Director, Planning Department • Nancy Bragado, Deputy Director, Planning Department • Alyssa Muto, Deputy Director, Planning Department • Anne Fege, Chair, Community Forestry Advisory Board • Melissa Garcia, Senior Planner, Planning Department • Jeremy Barrick, Urban Forestry Program Manager, Planning Department • Sergio Arias, Horticulturist, Transportation and Storm Water Department • Lara Gates, Community Development Specialist IV, Planning Department • Nancy Graham, Senior Planner, Planning Department • Kyle J. Stevens, Intern, Planning Department 4 FIVE YEAR PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...............................................................................................................7 Definition and Scope of Urban Forestry.............................................................................9 Current Structure of San Diego Urban Forest Management.......................................11 Background.........................................................................................................................12 Climate Action Plan Implementation................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forestry Manual
    URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction _______________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Purpose _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Objectives __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Definition of Terms _____________________________________________________________________________ 3-6 Standard of Care __________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Tree Care Management ________________________________________________________________________ 6-7 Tree Care Procedures _________________________________________________________________________ 8-17 Arboretum & Botanic Garden _______________________________________________________________ 17-18 Utility, Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repairs ________________________________________________ 19-20 New Development and Construction ______________________________________________________ 21-25 Tools and Staffing ___________________________________________________________________________ 26-27 Jurisdiction/Governing Authority __________________________________________________________ 27-29 Tree Donation Program _____________________________________________________________________ 30-31 Glendora’s Protected Trees _____________________________________________________________________ 32 List of Approved and Undesirable Trees ___________________________________________________ 33-35 FAQ’s __________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Partners in Progress
    Partners in Progress CALIFORNIA Final Report 1 Table of Contents California ReLeaf....................................................3 Selection by the US Forest Service......................4 ARRA Sub-Grant Recipients California Urban Forests Council..........................5 The City of Chico....................................................6 Community Services & Employment Training.....7 Daly City.................................................................8 Friends of Oakland Parks......................................9 Friends of the Urban Forest................................10 Goleta Valley Beautiful.........................................11 Hollywood/LA Beautification Team....................12 Koreatown Youth and Community Center.........13 The Los Angeles Conservation Corps.................14 North East Tree....................................................15 Our City Forest.....................................................16 The City of Porterville..........................................17 Sacramento Tree Foundation..............................18 Tree Fresno...........................................................19 The Urban Corps of San Diego County...............20 Urban Releaf.........................................................21 2 alifornia ReLeaf works statewide to promote Calliances among community-based groups, individuals, industry, and government agencies, encouraging each to contribute to the livability of our cities and the protection of our environment by planting and caring for trees. California
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forest Assessments Resource Guide
    Trees in cities, a main component of a city’s urban forest, contribute significantly to human health and environmental quality. Urban forest ecosystem assessments are a key tool to help quantify the benefits that trees and urban forests provide, advancing our understanding of these valuable resources. Over the years, a variety of assessment tools have been developed to help us better understand the benefits that urban forests provide and to quantify them into measurable metrics. The results they provide are extremely useful in helping to improve urban forest policies on all levels, inform planning and management, track environmental changes over time and determine how trees affect the environment, which consequently enhances human health. American Forests, with grant support from the U.S. Forest Service’s Urban and Community Forestry Program, developed this resource guide to provide a framework for practitioners interested in doing urban forest ecosystem assessments. This guide is divided into three main sections designed to walk you through the process of selecting the best urban forest assessment tool for your needs and project. In this guide, you will find: Urban Forest Management, which explains urban forest management and the tools used for effective management How to Choose an Urban Forests Ecosystem Assessment Tool, which details the series of questions you need to answer before selecting a tool Urban Forest Ecosystem Assessment Tools, which offers descriptions and usage tips for the most common and popular assessment tools available Urban Forest Management Many of the best urban forest programs in the country have created and regularly use an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) to define the scope and methodology for accomplishing urban forestry goals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Review of Resilience in Urban Forestry
    Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 46(3): May 2020 185 Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2020. 46(3):185–196 ARBORICULTURE URBAN FORESTRY Scientific Journal of the International& Society of Arboriculture A Literature Review of Resilience in Urban Forestry By Emily S. Huff, Michelle L. Johnson, Lara A. Roman, Nancy F. Sonti, Clara C. Pregitzer, Lindsay K. Campbell, and Heather McMillen Abstract. Urban forests provide many benefits to residents and may also improve cities’ resilience, the overall capacity to recover from anthro- pogenic and natural disturbances. Resilience is often considered from an ecological, social, or social-ecological perspective. In this literature review, we synthesize past studies (n = 31) to explore resilience in urban forests and green spaces and to understand how social or ecological perspectives have been considered. We found studies that combine resilience and urban forests have been increasing over time. Definitions of both resilience and urban forests are highly variable, but generally the studies increasingly focus on a social-ecological systems approach. The most common theoretical framework applied to understanding urban forests and resilience is a risk and vulnerability assessment approach. Studies were spread across geographies, with some concentration near major research stations and universities with scientists who specialize in resilience and urban green spaces. As more attention is focused on the role of green infrastructure in contributing to urban resilience, we encourage the adoption of consistent definitions, theories, and indicators. Keywords. Adaptive Capacity; Resilience; Social-Ecological Systems; Urban Forestry; Vulnerability. INTRODUCTION negative effects, like compacted soils that could reduce Resilience is an emerging policy goal for cities world- the sustainability of the forest and reduce the potential wide, as cities struggle to recover from both chronic opportunities for forests and trees to provide benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values, San Francisco’S Urban Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Assessing Urban Forest Forest Service Eff ects and Values Northern Research Station Resource Bulletin NRS-8 San Francisco’s Urban Forest Abstract An analysis of trees in San Francisco, CA reveals that this city has about 669,000 trees with canopies that cover 11.9 percent of the area. The most common tree species are blue gum eucalyptus, Monterey pine, and Monterey cypress. The urban forest currently stores about 196,000 tons of carbon valued at $3.6 million. In addition, these trees remove about 5,200 tons of carbon per year ($95,000 per year) and about 260 tons of air pollution per year ($1.3 million per year). The structural, or compensatory, value is estimated at $1.7 billion. Information on the structure and functions of the urban forest can be used to improve and augment support for urban forest management programs and to integrate urban forests within plans to improve environmental quality in the San Francisco area. The Authors DAVID J. NOWAK is a research forester and project leader, ROBERT E. HOEHN III, is a biological sciences technician, DANIEL E. CRANE is an information technology specialist, JACK C. STEVENS is a forester, and JEFFREY T. WALTON is a research forester with the Forest Service’s Northern Research Station at Syracuse, NY. Acknowledgments We are grateful for the contributions of Alexis Harte, UFORE project coordinator; Leslie Bandy, survey coordination; Karin Avila, Sarah Cobey, Maria D’agostino, Rachel Freund, Meleana Judd, Lorraine Maldague, Jennifer Mar, and Kelly Palomera, surveyors. Published by: For additional copies: USDA FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 February 2007 Fax: (740)368-0152 Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us Executive Summary Trees in cities can contribute signifi cantly to human health and environmental quality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Wildland- Urban Interface Concept
    The Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) is a common story line in many of today’s wildfire events. The WUI concept was formally introduced in 1987 Forest Service Research budget documents but was not acknowledged as a major component for federal fire management until the 2000 National Fire Plan. Although the 1987 introduction was meant to increase research focus on demographic factors influencing fire and other resource management, its California roots can be traced to post-World War II civil defense concerns about fire and water. The author offers a personal perspective on why the WUI concept was promoted by the Forest Service at an inauspicious time for fire research. The Emergence of the Wildland- Urban Interface Concept n January 27, 1987, President Ronald Reagan gave his sixth State of the Union address. Reagan’s speech was not well received.1 Forest Service O Research—and Fire Research in particular—had suffered through six years of the Republican president’s budget request reductions. Although these proposed reductions were partially offset by targeted (i.e., “ear- aged 51,805 fires and 2,021,846 acres burned and supported the mark”) restorations by the Democrat-controlled Congress, Forest argument that the “fire problem was solved.”2 This assumption Service research funding continually eroded. Fire activity in the would be reinforced by fire statistics that showed no discernible previous four years of the Reagan presidency (1983–86) had aver- upward trend. With the exception of the Yellowstone Fires in BY WILLIAM T. SOMMERS 12 FOREST HISTORY TODAY | FALL 2008 F. E. DUNHAM, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forestry Management Plan
    [URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN] A plan to sustainably, holistically and efficiently manage Bozeman’s urban forest to realize the full expanse of benefits urban trees can provide 1 Acknowledgements: Mitch Overton: Director of Parks and Recreation Bozeman Bozeman Tree Advisory Board The Bozeman Citizenry Jamie Kirby: Montana DNRC This document was funded by an urban forestry program development grant from the State of Montana - Department of Natural Resources & Conservation – Urban & Community Forestry Program Gallatin Tree Care, February 2016 Bozeman Urban Forestry Management Plan 2 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 History and People .................................................................................................................................... 6 Process and Plan Development ................................................................................................................. 7 Climate and Environment ......................................................................................................................... 7 Population Dynamics ................................................................................................................................ 8 Value of Urban Forest ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values After Hurricane Impacts in Louisiana
    Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values After Hurricane Impacts in Louisiana Kamran K. Abdollahi, Ph.D. Urban Forestry • The art, science, and technology of managing trees and forest resources in and around urban community ecosystems for the physiological, sociological, economic, and aesthetic benefits trees provide society. (Helms, 1998) • HELMS, JOHN A., ed. 1998. The Dictionary of Forestry. P. 193. Bethesda, Maryland: The Society of American Foresters. What is Urban Forestry • Science and Technology • Urban Forest Ecosystem Based Biophysical • Biophysical (Biological Management of Sustainable Urban Forest and Physical) Ecosystem for Improving • Management the Quality of life in Urban • Sustainable and Rural Communities. • Quality of Life Example: Baton Rouge Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis • Collaboration with the • Utilization of the Results USDA-FS – Management • Why we used UFORE/i-Tree – Research • Innovations: Bioproduct • Results Development from Wood • Potentials for enhancing Waste generated from the urban forest i-Tree Eco – Education – Outreach – Policy & Investment/Funding Implications at City, State, and National Levels Enhancing Urban Forestry Education, Research and Outreach Regional and National Climate Change Assessment (Science and Technology Integration into Urban Forestry Education) Baton Rouge Capital of Louisiana Historic Sites &Tourism Native Trees Major Port City Urban Green Infrastructure Post-Hurricane Gustav and the need for Baton Rouge Urban Forest Assessment DEAD TREES REPORTED "REMOVED" Large, 13000, 21% Small, 22000, 36% Mid, 26000, 43% Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis for Baton Rouge, Louisiana • Project Team – Kamran K. Abdollahi, Ph.D. (Professor, SU Ag Center) – Zhu Hua Ning, Ph.D. (Professor, SU Ag Center) – Puskar Khanel, Ph.D. (Former Ph.D. Student- • Assistant Professor-Clemson University) – Thomas Legindeniye, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]