DOCSLIB.ORG

2002R0881 — En — 24.08.2005 — 032.001 — 1 B Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2002R0881 — En — 24.08.2005 — 032.001 — 1 B Council 2002R0881 — EN — 24.08.2005 — 032.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2002 of 3 June 2002 L 145 14 4.6.2002 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2002 of 4 September 2002 L 237 3 5.9.2002 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1644/2002 of 13 September 2002 L 247 25 14.9.2002 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1754/2002 of 1 October 2002 L 264 23 2.10.2002 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1823/2002 of 11 October 2002 L 276 26 12.10.2002 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1893/2002 of 23 October 2002 L 286 19 24.10.2002 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1935/2002 of 29 October 2002 L 295 11 30.10.2002 ►M8 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2083/2002 of 22 November 2002 L 319 22 23.11.2002 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EC) No 145/2003 of 27 January 2003 L 23 22 28.1.2003 ►M10 Commission Regulation (EC) No 215/2003 of 3 February 2003 L 28 41 4.2.2003 ►M11 Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2003 of 7 February 2003 L 33 28 8.2.2003 ►M12 Commission Regulation (EC) No 342/2003 of 21 February 2003 L 49 13 22.2.2003 ►M13 Commission Regulation (EC) No 350/2003 of 25 February 2003 L 51 19 26.2.2003 ►M14 Commission Regulation (EC) No 370/2003 of 27 February 2003 L 53 33 28.2.2003 ►M15 Commission Regulation (EC) No 414/2003 of 5 March 2003 L 62 24 6.3.2003 ►M16 Council Regulation (EC) No 561/2003 of 27 March 2003 L 82 1 29.3.2003 ►M17 Commission Regulation (EC) No 742/2003 of 28 April 2003 L 106 16 29.4.2003 ►M18 Commission Regulation (EC) No 866/2003 of 19 May 2003 L 124 19 20.5.2003 ►M19 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1012/2003 of 12 June 2003 L 146 50 13.6.2003 ►M20 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1184/2003 of 2 July 2003 L 165 21 3.7.2003 ►M21 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1456/2003 of 14 August 2003 L 206 27 15.8.2003 ►M22 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1607/2003 of 12 September 2003 L 229 19 13.9.2003 ►M23 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1724/2003 of 29 September 2003 L 247 18 30.9.2003 ►M24 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1991/2003 of 12 November 2003 L 295 81 13.11.2003 ►M25 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2049/2003 of 20 November 2003 L 303 20 21.11.2003 ►M26 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2157/2003 of 10 December 2003 L 324 17 11.12.2003 ►M27 Commission Regulation (EC) No 19/2004 of 7 January 2004 L 4 11 8.1.2004 ►M28 Commission Regulation (EC) No 100/2004 of 21 January 2004 L 15 18 22.1.2004 2002R0881 — EN — 24.08.2005 — 032.001 — 2 ►M29 Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2004 of 30 January 2004 L 28 15 31.1.2004 ►M30 Commission Regulation (EC) No 391/2004 of 1 March 2004 L 64 36 2.3.2004 ►M31 Commission Regulation (EC) No 524/2004 of 19 March 2004 L 83 10 20.3.2004 ►M32 Commission Regulation (EC) No 667/2004 of 7 April 2004 L 104 110 8.4.2004 ►M33 Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2004 of 6 May 2004 L 173 6 7.5.2004 ►M34 Commission Regulation (EC) No 984/2004 of 14 May 2004 L 180 24 15.5.2004 ►M35 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1187/2004 of 25 June 2004 L 227 19 26.6.2004 ►M36 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1237/2004 of 5 July 2004 L 235 5 6.7.2004 ►M37 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1277/2004 of 12 July 2004 L 241 12 13.7.2004 ►M38 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1728/2004 of 1 October 2004 L 306 13 2.10.2004 ►M39 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1840/2004 of 21 October 2004 L 322 5 23.10.2004 ►M40 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2034/2004 of 26 November 2004 L 353 11 27.11.2004 ►M41 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2145/2004 of 15 December 2004 L 370 6 17.12.2004 ►M42 Commission Regulation (EC) No 14/2005 of 5 January 2005 L 5 10 7.1.2005 ►M43 Commission Regulation (EC) No 187/2005 of 2 February 2005 L 31 4 4.2.2005 ►M44 Commission Regulation (EC) No 301/2005 of 23 February 2005 L 51 15 24.2.2005 ►M45 Commission Regulation (EC) No 717/2005 of 11 May 2005 L 121 62 13.5.2005 ►M46 Commission Regulation (EC) No 757/2005 of 18 May 2005 L 126 38 19.5.2005 ►M47 Commission Regulation (EC) No 853/2005 of 3 June 2005 L 141 8 4.6.2005 ►M48 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1190/2005 of 20 July 2005 L 193 27 23.7.2005 ►M49 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1264/2005 of 28 July 2005 L 201 29 2.8.2005 ►M50 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1278/2005 of 2 August 2005 L 202 34 3.8.2005 ►M51 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1347/2005 of 16 August 2005 L 212 26 17.8.2005 ►M52 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1378/2005 of 22 August 2005 L 219 27 24.8.2005 Amended by: ►A1 Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the L 236 33 23.9.2003 Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 23 (1277/2004) 2002R0881 — EN — 24.08.2005 — 032.001 — 3 ▼B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 60, 301 and 308 thereof, Having regard to Common Position 2002/402/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Usama bin Laden, members of the Al- Qaida organisation and the Taliban and other individuals, groups, under- takings and entities associated with them and repealing Common Positions 96/746/CFSP, 1999/727/CFSP, 2001/154/CFSP and 2001/771/ CFSP (1), Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (2), Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3), Whereas: (1) On 16 January 2002, the Security Council of the United Nations adopted Resolution 1390(2002) determining that the Taliban had failed to respond to its demands made in a number of previous resolutions and condemning the Taliban for allowing Afghanistan to be used as a base for terrorist training and activities and also condemning the Al-Qaida network and other associated terrorist groups for their terrorist acts and destruction of property. (2) The Security Council decided, inter alia, that the flight ban and certain export restrictions imposed on Afghanistan further to its Resolutions 1267(1999) and 1333(2000) should be repealed and that the scope of the freezing of funds and the prohibition on funds being made available, which were imposed further to these Resolutions, should be adjusted. It also decided that a prohibition on providing the Taliban and the Al-Qaida organisa- tion with certain services related to military activities should be applied. In accordance with paragraph 3 of Resolution 1390 (2002), those measures will be reviewed by the Security Council 12 months after adoption of the resolution and at the end of this period the Security Council will either allow the measures to continue or decide to improve them. (3) In this regard, the Security Council recalled the obligation to implement in full its Resolution 1373(2001) with regard to any member of the Taliban and the Al-Qaida organisation, but also with regard to those who are associated with them and have parti- cipated in the financing, planning, facilitation, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts. (4) These measures fall under the scope of the Treaty and, therefore, notably with a view to avoiding distortion of competition, Community legislation is necessary to implement the relevant decisions of the Security Council as far as the territory of the Community is concerned. For the purpose of this Regulation, the territory of the Community is deemed to encompass the (1) See page 4 of this Official Journal. (2) Proposal submitted on 6 March 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cause of Misfire in Counter-Terrorist Financing Regulation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Making a Killing: The Cause of Misfire in Counter-Terrorist Financing Regulation A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Ian Oxnevad June 2019 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John Cioffi, Chairperson Dr. Marissa Brookes Dr. Fariba Zarinebaf Copyright by Ian Oxnevad 2019 The Dissertation of Ian Oxnevad is approved: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Making a Killing: The Cause of Misfire in Counter-Terrorist Financing Regulation by Ian Oxnevad Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Political Science University of California, Riverside, June 2019 Dr. John Cioffi, Chairperson Financial regulations designed to counter the financing of terrorism have spread internationally over past several decades, but little is known about their effectiveness or why certain banks get penalized for financing terrorism while others do not. This research addresses this question and tests for the effects of institutional linkages between banks and states on the enforcement of these regulations. It is hypothesized here that a bank’s institutional link to its home state is necessary to block attempted enforcement. This research utilizes comparative studies of cases in which enforcement and penalization were attempted, and examines the role of institutional links between the bank and state in these outcomes. The case comparisons include five cases in all, with three comprising positive cases in which enforcement was blocked, and two in which penalty occurred. Combined, these cases control for rival variables such as rule of law, state capacity, iv authoritarianism, and membership of a country in a regulatory body while also testing for the impact of institutional linkage between a bank and its state in the country’s national political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Counterterror Initiatives in the Terror Finance Program
    S. HRG. 108–802 COUNTERTERROR INITIATIVES IN THE TERROR FINANCE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS ON COUNTERTERROR INITIATIVES IN THE TERROR FINANCE PROGRAM, FO- CUSING ON THE ROLE OF THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING REGU- LATORY REGIME IN THE FINANCIAL WAR ON TERRORISM, BETTER UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY, INCREASED INFORMATION SHARING, DEVELOPING SIMILAR INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, AND THE FOR- MATION OF THE TERRORIST FINANCING OPERATIONS SECTION (TFOS) SEPTEMBER 25, OCTOBER 22, 2003, APRIL 29, AND SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/senate/senate05sh.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 20–396 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:21 May 03, 2005 Jkt 020396 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\20396.TXT BANK1 PsN: JIM COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama, Chairman ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska JACK REED, Rhode Island RICK SANTORUM, Pennsylvania CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JIM BUNNING, Kentucky EVAN BAYH, Indiana MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ZELL MILLER, Georgia JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan LINCOLN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist-Funds-Banks-Etc.Pdf
    Testimony of Steven Emerson Before the House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations "PATRIOT Act Oversight: Investigating Patterns of Terrorist Fundraising“ Fund-Raising Methods and Procedures for International Terrorist Organizations February 12, 2002 Steven Emerson Executive Director The Investigative Project [email protected] Washington, DC STEVEN EMERSON A Biographical Sketch 5505 Connecticut Avenue, NW, #341, Washington DC 20015-2601 Phone: (202) 363-8602 Fax: (202) 966-5191 E-Mail: [email protected] Steven Emerson is an internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security, a correspondent, and an author who also serves as the Executive Director of The Investigative Project. His current book, American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us, published by The Free Press, details the rise of the militant Islamic infrastructure in the United States and provides the most comprehensive account of the major fundamentalist Islamic cells on American soil to date. Mr. Emerson started The Investigative Project in late 1995 following the broadcast of his documentary film, "Jihad in America," on public television. The film exposed video of clandestine operations of militant Islamic terrorist groups on American soil. For the film, Mr. Emerson received numerous awards including the George Polk Award for best television documentary, one of the most prestigious awards in journalism. He also received the top prize from the Investigative Reporters and Editors Organization (IRE) for best investigative report in both print and television for the documentary. The award from the IRE was the fourth such award he had received from that group. Since 1996, Mr. Emerson has testified more than a dozen times before Congress on such topics as the terrorist infrastructure in the US, Palestinian violations of the Oslo accords, the protection of America's national infrastructure, and the threat of Islamic fundamentalism against the United States and the West.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Muslim Brotherhood
    Report I: History of the Muslim Brotherhood The History of the Muslim Brotherhood A Report by 9 Bedford Row 2 April 2015 9 Bedford Row London WC1R 4AZ 0044 207 489 2727 www.9bri.com 1 Report I: History of the Muslim Brotherhood Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 4 1.1 SUBJECT MATTER OF REPORT .................................................................................... 5 1.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE REPORTS .............................................................. 6 1.3 CURRENT REPORT: METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2: GROWTH STRATEGY & OBJECTIVES ................................................. 8 2.1 THE GROWTH STRATEGY OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT.................... 9 2.1.1 Setting the foundations for a mass movement .................................................... 9 2.2 ORIGINAL OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 Islam is the Solution .......................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Totalitarian reform ............................................................................................ 14 2.2.3 Using the language of violence .......................................................................... 16 2.2.4 Creation of an Anti-systemic movement ........................................................... 17 2.2.5
    [Show full text]
  • The Soft Hand of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe Migration Research Institute
    The Soft Hand of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe Migration Research Institute The usual suspect of Islamic movements is Salafism and its jihadist offshoots. The obvious threat posed by this movement is addressed by the media as well as by decision- makers. However, while Salafism threatens European democracies and values both socially and politically, it is not the only political force to reckon with. Other political and ideological non-violent movements – Sunni and Shiʻi equally – display agendas and actions that endanger European societies. Moreover, from an Islamist point of view, such non-violent movements are more effective than the radical Islamist movements in that they use legal ways such as political communication, transnational diplomatic support, finance, NGOs, media and law to have more impact on Islam and societies in Europe. Suffice it to say that the so-called Islamisation is chiefly carried out by these moderate Islamist movements, championed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Nine years ago The Economist asked the question whether the Muslim Brethren in the West are wolves or sheep? And it concluded that “the Islamists had become «part of the furniture»… it is better to talk to them, carefully and without illusions”.1 In light of recent data, provided by reports published in France and Germany, it is becoming extremely difficult for decision-makers in Europe to ignore the weight of the Muslim Brotherhood (founded in 1928 in Egypt, but since the 1950s acquired a stronghold in Europe). Despite the fact that the initial goal of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe “was to engage in mobilizing resources to overthrow Arab secular regimes and create Islamist regimes with the help of Islamists living in Europe”,2 the current strategy is to build an Islamic society and state in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ______X
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________x In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 MDL 1570 __________________________________________x This filing applies to the Estate of John P. O’Neill, Sr., et al. v. Al Baraka Investment and Development Corporation, et. al., 04 CV 01923 (RCC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : ESTATE OF JOHN P. O'NEILL, SR., : FIRST AMENDED on behalf of JOHN P. O'NEILL, SR., : COMPLAINT deceased, and on behalf of decedent' s heirs-at-law, : : CLASS ACTION J. P. O'NEILL, JR., : : C.I. O'NEILL, : : C. O'NEILL, : : CASE NO: D. A. O'NEILL, : 04-1923(RCC) : Plaintiffs, : : Jury Trial Demanded On Behalf of Themselves and : All Others Similarly Situated, : : v. : : AL BARAKA INVESTMENT : AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, : a/k/a AL BARAKA BANK, a/k/a DALLAH : AL BARAKA GROUP, LLC : : NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK a/k/a NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA : : FAISAL ISLAMIC BANK- SUDAN a/k/a FAYSAL : 1 ISLAMIC BANK- SUDAN a/k/a FAISAL ISLAMIC : BANK a/k/a FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK : : AL-RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT : CORPORATION, a/k/a AL RAJHI BANK : : AL BARAKAAT EXCHANGE LLC, : a/k/a AL BARAKAAT BANK : : DAR AL MAAL ISLAMI a/k/a DAR-AL-MALL AL : ISLAMI a/k/a DAR AL-MAAL AL- ISLAMI (DMI) : : AL SHAMAL ISLAMIC BANK, : a/k/A SHAMEL BANK, A/K/A BANK EL SHAMAR : : TADAMON ISLAMIC BANK : : DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK : : BANK AL-TAQWA, LTD. a/k/a BANK OF TAQWA a/k/a : BANK AL-TAQWA a/k/a BANK OF TAQWA LIMITED : : NADA INTERNATIONAL ANSTALT a/k/a YOUSSEF M : NADA & CO GESELLSCHAFT MBH a/k/a YOUSSEF : M.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Muslim Brotherhood's Global Threat”
    TESTIMONY for Hearing before: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Global Threat” Submitted by Dr. M. ZUHDI JASSER PRESIDENT, AMERICAN ISLAMIC FORUM FOR DEMOCRACY July 11, 2018 Introduction: Thank you Chairman DeSantis and members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security for holding this very important hearing on “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Global Threat.” I am Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) based in Phoenix, Arizona. I am here today, because as an American Muslim, I have dedicated my life to countering the oppressive and radicalizing influence of Islamist groups in the West upon our communities. No group embodies the threat of radical Islamism more than the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), and no group runs deeper into the consciousness of global Islamism, especially in our Arab Sunni communities than the Muslim Brotherhood and its global network of affiliates and progeny across the world. Unfortunately, much of the conversation about the Muslim Brotherhood has been obstructed, muffled, marginalized, deferred, or minimized by Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers or their allies. As a devout Muslim who loves my faith, and loves my nation, the avoidance behavior of confronting the Muslim Brotherhood is a major obstacle to our national security and harmony. This has stemmed from a bigger policy to de- emphasize “radical Islam” and the “Islamist” root cause of global Islamist terror. There is no better place to begin an honest conversation about the Islamist threat imposed upon our nation than a focus on the Muslim Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundraising Methods and Procedures for Terrorist Organizations
    Testimony of Steven Emerson Before the House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations "PATRIOT Act Oversight: Investigating Patterns of Terrorist Fundraising” Fund-Raising Methods and Procedures for International Terrorist Organizations February 12, 2002 Steven Emerson Executive Director The Investigative Project [email protected] Washington, DC Introduction President George Bush stated on September 24, 2001, “Money is the life- blood of terrorist operations. Today, we're asking the world to stop payment.” Since then, the US government has engaged in a full-court press designed to freeze, seize, interrupt, slow down and otherwise interdict the flow of funds to terrorists. To a certain extent, however, government agencies were forced to act without having first developed the critical intelligence base on terrorist fundraising that would ordinarily would have preceded prior to government action. But these were not ordinary times—and it became imperative that the flow of funds available to terrorists be shut down immediately. Government agencies and law enforcement rose to the occasion and performed brilliantly. The American public owes a great deal of gratitude to the thousands of government agents who have worked tirelessly on tracking down terrorist assets around the globe. But with the benefit of hindsight and the opportunity to distill investigative intelligence, we can now step back and examine the primary routes through which terrorists have raised or laundered monies. The manner in which terrorists have raised money for their horrific operations has ranged from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, the use of charitable organizations, corporate “front” entities, financial institutions, and Internet-based funding.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ______X
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________x In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 03 MDL 1570 __________________________________________x This filing applies to the Estate of John P. O’Neill, Sr., et al. v. Al Baraka Investment and Development Corporation, et. al., 04 CV 01923 (RCC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : SECOND ESTATE OF JOHN P. O'NEILL, SR., : AMENDED on behalf of JOHN P. O'NEILL, SR., : COMPLAINT deceased, and on behalf of decedent' s heirs-at-law, : : CLASS ACTION J. P. O'NEILL, JR., : : C.I. O'NEILL, : : C. O'NEILL, : : CASE NO: D. A. O'NEILL, : 04-1923(RCC) : Plaintiffs, : : Jury Trial Demanded On Behalf of Themselves and : All Others Similarly Situated, : : v. : : AL BARAKA INVESTMENT : AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, : a/k/a AL BARAKA BANK, a/k/a DALLAH : AL BARAKA GROUP, LLC : : NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK a/k/a NATIONAL : COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND : 1 SNCB CORPORATE FINANCE LTD. AND : SNCB SECURITIES LIMITED : : FAISAL ISLAMIC BANK- SUDAN a/k/a FAYSAL : ISLAMIC BANK- SUDAN a/k/a FAISAL ISLAMIC : BANK a/k/a FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK : : AL-RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT : CORPORATION, a/k/a AL RAJHI BANK : : AL BARAKAAT EXCHANGE LLC, : a/k/a AL BARAKAAT BANK : : DAR AL MAAL ISLAMI a/k/a DAR-AL-MALL AL : ISLAMI a/k/a DAR AL-MAAL AL- ISLAMI (DMI) : AND DAR AL MAAL ADMINSTRATIVE : SERVICES SA AND DAR AL MALL AL ISLAMI : TRUST : : AL SHAMAL ISLAMIC BANK, : a/k/A SHAMEL BANK, A/K/A BANK EL SHAMAR : : TADAMON ISLAMIC BANK : : DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK : : BANK AL-TAQWA, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • S/2003/1070 Security Council
    United Nations S/2003/1070 Security Council Distr.: General 2 December 2003 Original: English Letter dated 1 December 2003 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999) concerning Al-Qaida and the Taliban and associated individuals and entities addressed to the President of the Security Council In accordance with paragraph 13 of Security Council resolution 1455 (2003), I have the honour to transmit herewith the second report of the Monitoring Group established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1363 (2001). I should be grateful if the attached report could be brought to the attention of the Council members and issued as a Security Council document as soon as possible. (Signed) Heraldo Muñoz Chairman Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999) concerning Al-Qaida and the Taliban and associated individuals and entities 03-60046 (E) 111203 *0360046* S/2003/1070 Annex Letter dated 3 November 2003 from the Chairman of the Monitoring Group established pursuant to resolution 1363 (2001) and extended by resolutions 1390 (2002) and 1455 (2003) addressed to the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999) concerning Al-Qaida and the Taliban and associated individuals and entities On behalf of the members of the Monitoring Group established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1363 (2001) and assigned, pursuant to resolution 1455 (2003), to monitor for a period of 12 months the implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph 8 of the latter resolution, I have the honour to enclose the second report in accordance with paragraph 13 of resolution 1455 (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Burden of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood's
    THE BURDEN OF THE EGYPTIAN MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD’S HISTORICAL LEGACY: THE IDEOLOGY AND AGENDA Mkouboi Mohamed The aim of the study was the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s history focusing on its ideology and agenda. In this regard, the 18th century economic development in the Western Europe influenced the Arab and the Muslim Worlds in a way that Muslim scholars attempted to present an alternative system to the attractiveness of the Western modernization. However, the EMB founded in 1928, despite its tirelessly struggle, full of confrontations and flexibility at the same time towards the domestic as well as the international Community actors failed to achieve its first step agenda which is ruling Egypt. EMB’s regional and International expansionism ambition might be the reason behind its failure to be accepted by the regional secular parties, Egyptian Copts and the International Community main actors such as U.S. and UK. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 789 A. Background ............................................................................... 790 B. Literature Review...................................................................... 790 I. EGYPTIAN MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD’S IDEOLOGY AND AGENDA .............. 791 A. Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s Ideology................................ 792 B. Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s Agenda ................................. 796 CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Sanctions Regulations (Title 31 Part 595 of the U.S
    Executive Order 13224 blocking Terrorist Property and a summary of the Terrorism Sanctions Regulations (Title 31 Part 595 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations), Terrorism List Governments Sanctions Regulations (Title 31 Part 596 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations), and Foreign Terrorist Organizations Sanctions Regulations (Title 31 Part 597 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations) EXECUTIVE ORDER 13224 - BLOCKING PROPERTY AND PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS WITH PERSONS WHO COMMIT, THREATEN TO COMMIT, OR SUPPORT TERRORISM By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c) (UNPA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and in view of United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1214 of December 8, 1998, UNSCR 1267 of October 15, 1999, UNSCR 1333 of December 19, 2000, and the multilateral sanctions contained therein, and UNSCR 1363 of July 30, 2001, establishing a mechanism to monitor the implementation of UNSCR 1333, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon committed on September 11, 2001, acts recognized and condemned in UNSCR 1368 of September 12, 2001, and UNSCR 1269 of October 19, 1999, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on United States nationals or the United States constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and in furtherance of my proclamation of September 14, 2001, Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
    [Show full text]