DOCSLIB.ORG

Cybersouth LIST of PARTICIPANTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cybersouth LIST of PARTICIPANTS CyberSouth Law Enforcement training strategy on cybercrime and electronic evidence in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region 24-25 September 2019, Amman, Jordan, LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Country Name Position Lieutenant-colonel ALGERIA Mourad Abdelali Ecole Supérieure de formation de la Gendarmerie Nationale Commandant ALGERIA Brahim Thabti Service central de lutte contre la cybercriminalité Belgian Federal Judicial Police Direction Serious Organized Crime BELGIUM Miguël Blauwbloeme Federal Computer Crime Unit Team Cyber DCPJ/SDLC FRANCE Dominique Renard Ministère de l’Intérieur Country Name Position JORDAN Lt.Col Mustafa Alswkar Public Security Directorate JORDAN Lt.Col Ra’ed Balasmeh Public Security Directorate JORDAN Capt. Kefah Merian Public Security Directorate Capt. Anas Halahleh Public Security Directorate JORDAN JORDAN Maj Judge Ahmad Odwan Directorate of Military Justice JORDAN Capt Judge Tareq Shwrafat Directorate of Military Justice JORDAN Maj. Judge Yarob Alqudah Jordan Armed Forces Obada Obeid Jordan Armed Forces JORDAN JORDAN Dr. Ahmad Odat Irbid National University JORDAN Maj. Nasser Al Jaafick The General Directorate of Gendarmeries Capt. Tareq Adel The General Directorate of Gendarmeries JORDAN Capt. Ralal Hammouri JORDAN Commissaire de police, Chef unité formation au sein de département internet MOROCCO Moufdi Bouselmane Ministère de l’Intérieur Commissaire de Police MOROCCO Zakaria Azzat Ministère de l’Intérieur 2 Country Name Position Commandant MOROCCO Khaled Moufadal Gendarmerie Royale Ministère de l’Intérieur Capitaine MOROCCO Soufiane Mounir Gendarmerie Royale Ministère de l’Intérieur Head of Cybercrime Department ROMANIA Marius-Daniel Cuciurianu Bucharest Organised Crime Unit Romanian National Police - Lieutenant-Colonel TUNISIA Houssem Abdelbaqui Alyoussfi Ministère de l'Intérieur/ Police Commandant TUNISIA Chouaib Badreddine Amara Ministère de l'Intérieur/ Police Chef service de renseignement tactique et opérationnel à l’Unité d'appui technique et renseignements tactique au Au sein direction de renseignements TUNISIA Zied Lahmar et investigation au sein de la direction générale de la garde nationale Ministère de l'Intérieur/Garde Nationale Chef service d'internet et cyberespace au sein de Sous-direction des opérations techniques ou Direction de la lutte contre le terrorisme au sein TUNISIA Mohamed Henchiri de la direction générale de la garde nationale Ministère de l'Intérieur/Garde Nationale Cyber Digital Career Pathways Project Lead UNITED KINGDOM Fiona Paterson Crime and Criminal Justice Faculty ACADEMIA, NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS AND PRIVATE SECTOR Organisation Name Position Investigation and Forensic Unit BitDefender Silviu Sofronie BitDefender Romania University of Madrid Carlota Urruela Project Manager and Researcher at Universidad Autonoma de Madrid 3 Organisation Name Position Lecturer University of Madrid Dr Álvaro Ortigosa Head of the Institute for Forensic and Security Sciences Universidad Autonoma de Madrid INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS Organisation Name Position European Union agency Joerg Koestinger Project Manager CEPOL European Commission Minister Counsellor Koenraad Dassen EEAS- Delegation of the European Union to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan European Commission Giorgio Giorgi Delegation of the European Union to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan EEAS- Interpol Lili Sun Head of training unit within cybercrime directorate COUNCIL OF EUROPE SECRETARIAT Name Details Head of Operations Cybercrime Programme Office Virgil Spiridon Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe Programme Manager Cybercrime Programme Office (C-PROC) Bucharest Marie Agha-Wevelsiep Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law 4 Project assistant Cybercrime Programme Office (C-PROC) Bucharest Iulia Suciu Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: a Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 15 The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J. Lamb, with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified com- batant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: President Bill Clinton addressing Croat-Muslim Federation Peace Agreement signing ceremony in the Old Executive Office Building, March 18, 1994 (William J. Clinton Presidential Library) The Bosnian Train and Equip Program The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power By Christopher J. Lamb with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 15 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. March 2014 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Another History of Europe at War. Gendarmeries and Police Facing the First World War (1914-1918)
    Another history of Europe at war. Gendarmeries and police facing the First World War (1914-1918) International Conference organised at the EOGN in Melun on the 4th , 5th and 6th February 2016 by : Le Centre de recherche de l'École des officiers de la Gendarmerie nationale and Le musée de la Gendarmerie, in cooperation with : Université Paris-Sorbonne the Centre d'histoire du XIXe siècle Labex EHNE Université catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve Le Pôle d'attraction interuniversitaire « Justice et populations : l'expérience belge en perspective internationale ») Dr. Guillaume Payen Chef du pôle histoire et faits sociaux contemporains du CREOGN, chercheur associé au Centre Roland Mousnier, université Paris-Sorbonne Dr. Jonas Campion Chargé de recherches du FRS-FNRS, Centre d’histoire du droit et de la justice, université catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgique) Dr. Laurent López Chercheur associé au CESDIP (université de Versailles/Saint Quentin) et au Centre d'histoire du XIXe siècle (universités Panthéon-Sorbonne et Paris-Sorbonne) The history of Europe into the First World War is still to be written from the police's point of view, in spite of the frequent claim of "constraint"1 in the conflict's historiography. Classically marking the break between the 19th and the 20th centuries, the First World War is more than a separation between two periods. It is a deep historiographic void on both national and European scales. From a Europe-wide perspective, while the comparative approach carried out by Jonas Campion and confronting the cases of the Belgian, French and Dutch gendarmeries focuses on the end of the Second World War2, the book published under G.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Something Is Wrong with Our Army…' Command, Leadership & Italian
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies ‘Something is wrong with our army…’ Command, Leadership & Italian Military Failure in the First Libyan Campaign, 1940-41. Dr. Craig Stockings There is no question that the First Libyan Campaign of 1940-41 was an Italian military disaster of the highest order. Within hours of Mussolini’s declaration of war British troops began launching a series of very successful raids by air, sea and land in the North African theatre. Despite such early setbacks a long-anticipated Italian invasion of Egypt began on 13 September 1940. After three days of ponderous and costly advance, elements of the Italian 10th Army halted 95 kilometres into Egyptian territory and dug into a series of fortified camps southwest of the small coastal village of Sidi Barrani. From 9-11 December, these camps were attacked by Western Desert Force (WDF) in the opening stages of Operation Compass – the British counter-offensive against the Italian invasion. Italian troops not killed or captured in the rout that followed began a desperate and disjointed withdrawal back over the Libyan border, with the British in pursuit. The next significant engagement of the campaign was at the port-village Bardia, 30 kilometres inside Libya, in the first week of 1941. There the Australian 6 Division, having recently replaced 4 Indian Division as the infantry component of WDF (now renamed 13 Corps), broke the Italian fortress and its 40,000 defenders with few casualties. The feat was repeated at the port of Tobruk, deeper into Libya, when another 27,000 Italian prisoners were taken.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • Colonel Bentzi Gruber, Israel Defense Forces Reserves “Ethics in the Field: an Inside Look at the Israel Defense Forces”
    The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) cordially invites you to attend a NY Cabinet luncheon with Colonel Bentzi Gruber, Israel Defense Forces Reserves “ETHICS IN THE FIELD: AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES” Combining classified IDF footage and well-organized statistics, including exclusive footage from Operation Cast Lead as well as personal accounts from the battlefield, Col. Gruber explores the dilemmas constantly facing IDF commanders in the field. Col. Gruber was given access and permission to present materials and information that is usually only seen by military or government officials. An engaging, exciting, and eye-opening presentation, “Ethics in the Field” goes behind the scenes of the IDF’s daily battle to both ensure the country’s security and uphold one of the most rigorous military Codes of Ethics in the world today. Presentation includes footage of: • Soldiers exposing smuggling tunnels; • The diversions used by terrorists as cover for suicide bombers and kidnapping soldiers; • The pursuit and arrest of a would-be suicide bomber in the Nablus area, taken by an unmanned aerial vehicle; • Terrorists using children as living shields and using ambulances for transportation. Tuesday, April 5, 2011 12:00 – 2:00pm Yale Club (Trumbull Room, 18th Floor) 50 Vanderbilt Avenue New York, NY This program is open to members of the JINSA NY Cabinet. RSVP is required. Please contact Yola Johnston at [email protected] or (202) 667-3900. The NY Cabinet was formed to explore issues affecting both American and Israeli security. NY Cabinet members are invited to briefings on security and defense issues four to six times a year.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalent Ranks of the British Services and U.S. Air Force
    EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Commissioned Ranks Marshal of the Admiral of the Fleet Field Marshal Royal Air Force Command General of the Air Force Admiral Air Chief Marshal General General Vice Admiral Air Marshal Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Rear Admiral Air Vice Marshal Major General Major General Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore Brigadier General Colonel Captain Colonel Group Captain Commander Lieutenant Colonel Wing Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Squadron Leader Commander Major Major Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Captain EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT First Lieutenant Sub Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Second Lieutenant Midshipman Second Lieutenant Pilot Officer Notes: 1. Five-Star Ranks have been phased out in the British Services. The Five-Star ranks in the U.S. Services are reserved for wartime only. 2. The rank of Midshipman in the Royal Navy is junior to the equivalent Army and RAF ranks. EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Non-commissioned Ranks Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Class 1 (RSM) Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Warrant Officer Class 2b (RQSM) Chief Command Master Sergeant Warrant Officer Class 2a Chief Master Sergeant Chief Petty Officer Staff Sergeant Flight Sergeant First Senior Master Sergeant Chief Technician Senior Master Sergeant Petty Officer Sergeant Sergeant First Master Sergeant EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Voice Analysis
    Russian Colonel General Identified as Key MH17 Figure EMBARGOED UNTIL 7:00am (London) / 10:00am (Moscow) on Friday, December 8. All information in and linked to in this investigation, including the report, summary, and media files, is under embargo until this time. A joint investigation between The Insider and Bellingcat used open source research, investigative journalism, and forensic voice analysis to determine the identity of "Delfin," a key figure sought by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), the Dutch-led criminal investigation into the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17). The investigation has identified, to a high degree of certainty, Delfin as Colonel General Nikolai Fedorovich Tkachev, currently serving as the Chief Inspector of the Central Military District of the Russian Federation. Photographs, videos, and audio files related to this investigation can be found here. On 28 September 2016, the Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team (JIT), the criminal investigation into the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17), published a call for witnesses regarding two key individuals in the downing of the airliner: "Delfin" and "Orion," with the first name and patronymics of (respectively) Nikolai Fedorovich and Andrei Ivanovich. In their call for witnesses, the JIT also published a number of intercepted telephone calls between these two individuals, where they address each other by their first names and patronymic (a transcript of the calls can be found in English and Russian). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXX8PFG4vSM There are a number of details surrounding Delfin and Orion that are unclear, including their exact role in the downing of MH17, but the fact that the JIT has specifically requested information on them implies how they are key persons of interest in the criminal investigation of the tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and the Greek Coup of 1967
    Were the Eagle and the Phoenix Birds of a Feather? The United States and the Greek Coup of 1967 by Louis Klarevas Assistant Professor of Political Science City University of New York—College of Staten Island & Associate Fellow Hellenic Observatory—London School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 15 Hellenic Observatory-European Institute London School of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/hellenicObservatory February 2004 Author’s Note: The author wishes to thank the Hellenic Observatory of the London School of Economics for its generous support in the undertaking of this project. The author also wishes to thank Kevin Featherstone, Spyros Economides, and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou for comments on a previous draft. In the summer of 2004, Greece will host the Olympic Games. Americans attending the games and visiting traditional tourist stops in Athens are sure to be greeted with open arms. But for those who delve a bit further into the country-side seeking a taste of average Greek life, some are sure to hear some fascinating tales flavored with a strong hint of anti-Americanism. To many foreigners that visit Greece these days, it might seem like the cradle of democracy is also the cradle of conspiracy. Take these schemes, for example: (1) Orthodox Serbs, not Muslims, were the true victims of the slaughters in the Balkans during the 1990s—and the primary reason that NATO intervened was so that the United States could establish a military foothold there;1 (2) the U.S. Ambassador played a tacit role in the removal of the Secretary- General of Greece’s ruling political party;2 and (3) the attack on the World Trade Center was a joint Jewish-American conspiracy to justify a Western war against Muslims—with reports that no Jews died in the September 11 attacks.3 All of these perspectives have numerous subscribers in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Eli Bar-On, Has Recently Concluded a 25 Year Career in the Israel Defense Forces
    Colonel (Ret.) Eli Bar-On, has recently concluded a 25 year career in the Israel Defense Forces. His last position was an instructor at the Israel National Defense College (the INDC). There he was tasked with mentoring both the group and individual studies of senior, select officials from within Israel and the international community, with a particular focus on matters of national security, strategy, international relations and economics. Bar-On oversaw and led elite-level delegations to official visits in the US, China, Russia and numerous member states of the EU & NATO, participating in extensive dialogues and exchanges relevant to the national security of all parties present. Prior to that position Bar-On served as the Deputy Military Advocate General of the IDF (2012 to 2015), where he was in command of approximately 1,000 lawyers and legal experts, including during the events prior to, during and following Operation Pillar of Defense & Operation Protective Edge. He also served as the Chief Legal Advisor for the IDF in the West Bank from 2009 to 2012 and in a host of other senior legal positions, both as a litigator for the prosecution and the defense, as a judge and as a legal advisor. A prolific lecturer, Bar-On has provided expert presentations to hundreds of high level, Israeli and international delegations in Israel and throughout the world, including North America, Europe, Asia and Africa. He also led strategic international dialogues in a variety of sensitive issues. Furthermore, he has lectured at preeminent academic institutions throughout North America, Europe and China, bringing his legal experience to the fore in order to educate the next generation of legal practitioners, academics, public servants and elected officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Appointment of All Honorary Colonels in the British Army
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: FOI2019/13423/13/04 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk XXXXXX 09 January 2020 xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear XXXXXX, Thank you for your letter of 06 December in which you requested the following information: “a. A current list as at 6 December 2019 of all the Honorary Colonels in the British Army b. An explanation as to how these appointments are advertised to ensure a wide diverse group as possible have an opportunity to be considered for these appointments c. An explanation as to how individuals are then selected for an appointment as an Honorary Colonel” I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that the information in scope of your request is held and is below. In response to first part of your request please find attached a list of Honorary Colonels in the British Army. Some of this information is exempt from release under section 40 (Personal Data) of the FOIA. Section 40(2) has been applied to some of the information to protect personal information as governed by the Data Protection Act 2018. Section 40 is an absolute exemption and there is therefore no requirement to consider the public interest in deciding to withhold the information. In response to second part of your request please note that appointments are selected by nominations after basic criteria is met.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece: the Colonels' Puritan Revolution
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 5-1-1970 Greece: the colonels' Puritan revolution Nikolaos E. Mpras Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Mpras, Nikolaos E., "Greece: the colonels' Puritan revolution" (1970). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 72. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.72 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. TEE THESIS OF Nikola os E. I'1pras for the ~aster of Arts in Political Science presented May 11, 1970. Title: Greece: The Colonels' Puritan Revolution. APPR OVED BY M"EIVraERS OF ~~--Jitte~IS COt"lrJjITTEE : ~he purpose of this paper is to examine the present political situation in Greece and the events that took ~lace from the time that Papandreo~'s Center Gnion ?brty carne to power in 1964 to the military coup d'e~at in 1967. however, in order to 6evelop a picture of WIled, led to the cOup of 1967, it is necessary not only to discuss specific e~/ents -!?rior and during the cou-p. but also to present a brief background of modern Greek politics since Greece's independence from the Turks in 1821. ~he paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter briefly summarizes the events that took place on April 21, 1967; the second traces the events thLt led to the April 21 coup d'etat; the third indicates what the situation was before hpril 21, 1967; the fourth discusses the policies 6nd governing methods of the present military regime; the fifth is a concluding statement.
    [Show full text]