The Battle of Britain: Armament of the Competing Fighters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle of Britain: Armament of the Competing Fighters THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN: ARMAMENT OF THE COMPETING FIGHTERS Based on information from 'Flying Guns: World War 2' © Anthony G Williams 2004 Revised 29 August 2005, with thanks to contributors The three principal competing fighters of the Battle of Britain; the Supermarine Spitfire, Hawker Hurricane and Messerschmitt Bf 109, are well known. However, there is still some misunderstanding of the relative performance of the armament they used and the effect of this on the Battle. This article is an attempt to set the record straight. The armament The British armament was quite straightforward; both aircraft had eight belt- fed .303" (7.7mm) Browning guns mounted four in each wing outside the propeller disk. Rate of fire was 20 rounds per second per gun (160 rps overall) and the cartridge fired ball, AP, tracer or incendiary bullets weighing around 11.3 grams at around 740 m/s (2,430 fps). Total weight of projectiles fired was 1.8 kg (4 lb) per second. Ammunition capacity was enough for 16 seconds continuous firing in the Spitfire, slightly more in the Hurricane. The Messerschmitt's armament was mixed, and had been going through various changes. One constant in all 109s (until the later G series) was the twin MG 17s in the cowling, synchronised to fire through the propeller disk – this held their rate of fire down to about 17 rps each. The 7.9mm cartridge was slightly more powerful than the .303's although it is difficult to make direct comparisons as the bullet weight and muzzle velocity varied according to loading (and the round was improved early in the war with the even more powerful v-Munition). Magazine capacity was enough for a whole minute's continuous firing (reduced from 1,000 to 500 rounds per gun in later versions with engine-mounted cannon). The Bf 109E-1, which was still in service in some numbers at the start of the Battle, also had two more 7.9mm MG 17s in the wings with 500 rpg, giving 25 seconds' firing. Some were converted to take wing cannon instead. The Bf 109E-3 had two wing-mounted 20mm MG-FF cannon, a modified Oerlikon FF made by Ikaria Werke Berlin. It fired 134 gram projectiles at 600 m/s (1,970 fps), at a rate of about 9 per second. The 60 round drums which fed the cannon ran out after less than seven seconds (and perhaps less than that, as it appears that only 55 rounds were often loaded, presumably in the interests of reliable feeding). Some E-3 were modified to E-4 standard and redesignated. The Bf 109E-4, which entered service in May 1940 and was therefore the latest model used at the time of the BoB, introduced the MG-FFM cannon. This was a version of the MG-FF modified to fire the new, thin- walled high-capacity mine shells (Minengeschoss or M- Geschoss). Although containing far more explosive than the MG-FF's shells, the M-Geschoss was much lighter at 92 g. It was fired at a higher velocity of around 700 m/s (2,300 fps) but even so did not develop enough recoil to operate the MG-FF's mechanism, so the gun had to be altered with a lighter reciprocating weight and weaker recoil spring. Ammunition for the MG-FF and MG-FFM was therefore not interchangeable. It appears that MG-FFs were gradually converted to the FFM standard and the two terms used interchangeably thereafter. The ammunition Tests by the RAF indicated that both the .303 and 7.92mm AP bullets had some problems penetrating the structure of the relatively small and light Blenheim bomber. Both guns were fired at a range of 200 yards (180m) through the rear fuselage at the 4 mm armour plate protecting the rear gunner, which was angled at 60º to the line of fire. The results were poor; only 33% of the .303" rounds reached the armour (the rest being deflected or absorbed by the structure) and 6% penetrated it. In contrast, only 23% of the 7.92 mm bullets reached the armour, and just 1% penetrated. The incendiary ammunition was also variable in performance. Comparative British tests of British .303" and German 7.92 mm incendiary ammunition against the self-sealing wing tanks in the Blenheim, also fired from 200 yards (180m) astern, revealed that the .303" B. Mk IV incendiary tracer (based on the First World War Buckingham design – it was ignited on firing and burned on its way to the target) and the 7.92 mm were about equal, each setting the tanks alight with about one in ten shots fired. The B. Mk VI 'De Wilde' incendiary (named after the original Belgian inventor but in fact completely redesigned by Major Dixon), which contained 0.5 grams of SR 365 (a composition including barium nitrate which ignited on impact with the target) was twice as effective as these, scoring one in five. The 'De Wilde' bullets were first issued in June 1940 and tested operationally in the air battles over Dunkirk. Their improved effectiveness, coupled with the fact that the flash on impact indicated that the shooting was on target, was much appreciated by the fighter pilots. It was at first in short supply, and the initial RAF fighter loading was three guns loaded with ball, two with AP, two with Mk IV incendiary tracer and one with Mk VI incendiary. Another source for the Battle of Britain armament gives four guns with ball, two with AP and two with incendiaries (presumably Mk VI) with four of the last 25 rounds being tracer (presumably Mk IV incendiary/tracer) to tell the pilot he was running out of ammunition. It is not clear why ball was used at all; presumably there was a shortage of the more effective loadings. (By 1942 the standard loading for fixed .303s was half loaded with AP and half with incendiary.) The 20mm cannon did not entirely rely on the M-Geschoss. There was still a requirement for some tracer rounds, so lighter 117 g projectiles were developed (by fitting the 134 g HE-T with a light-alloy instead of brass fuze), loaded down to around 585 m/s (1,920 fps) to match the recoil characteristics of the M-Geschoss. The effectiveness of the M-Geschoss was somewhat reduced by the fast-acting fuze, which detonated instantly rather than inside the target's structure, although this was probably more of a problem against bombers than fighters. The British rated the M- Geschoss as about equal with the 20mm Hispano round, which contained much less HE but had a heavier shell fired at a higher velocity and could penetrate more deeply. Delayed-action fuzes for the German shells were introduced in 1941. AP shells were also developed later and were not available during the Battle of Britain. A comparison photo of the ammunition used in the Battle with some other rounds is shown on the right: from left to right, the . 303 British (7.7x56R), .5 inch Vickers (12.7x81), .50 Browning (12.7x99), 20mm Hispano (20x110), 7.92mm v-Munition (7.92x57), 20mm MG-FFM (20x80RB), 15mm MG 151 (15x96), 20mm MG 151/20 (20x82), 13mm MG 131 (13x64B) Effectiveness Comparisons of the effectiveness of the British and German armament are not unlike the comparisons of the aircraft – each had its strengths and weaknesses. The British armament had a very high rate of fire (160 v. 50 rounds per second for the Bf 109), increasing the chance of scoring a hit. In weight of fire the German guns had a slight advantage (2.0 v. 1.8 kg per second), whereas in total muzzle energy there was nothing to choose between them. The key difference was of course the high explosive in the 20mm shells, which was enough to give the Bf 109E-4 almost double the destructive power of the British fighters. The M-Geschoss were not good at penetrating armour but this was considered a reasonable price to pay for the increased HE blast effect. The Luftwaffe discovered that the most reliable way of bringing down aircraft was the general destructive effect of HE blast within the structure, rather than relying on being able to hit vital but small areas (e.g. the pilot!), which could be, and quickly were, protected by armour. For this reason, AP projectiles eventually disappeared from German cannon ammunition belts except for special purposes. Two other considerations were the location of the armament and the ballistics. Wing mounting had the disadvantage that the guns could all be harmonised to strike the same point at only one distance (the RAF initially selected 360 metres but reduced this to 225 metres in the light of battle experience). At shorter or longer distances, the fire was more dispersed (particularly from the Spitfire, whose guns were spread across the wing). In fact, at very short distances a good shot, firing at a Bf 109 at zero deflection, could conceivably miss altogether, the two clusters of bullets passing to either side of the slim fuselage and just above the wings (although they might clip the propeller tips!). The Bf 109's cowling mounted MG 17s did not suffer from this problem (although the wing-mounted cannon obviously did), but the German planes had a difficulty of their own in that the trajectories and times of flight of the MG and cannon projectiles were different, requiring some compromise in adjusting the guns and setting the sights. The low-velocity cannon were particularly difficult to hit with at long range, because of their curved trajectory and long flight time.
Recommended publications
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional Weapons
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 45 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2009 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman FRAeS Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore G R Pitchfork MBE BA FRAes *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain A J Byford MA MA RAF *Wing Commander P K Kendall BSc ARCS MA RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS RFC BOMBS & BOMBING 1912-1918 by AVM Peter Dye 8 THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAF BOMBS, 1919-1939 by 15 Stuart Hadaway RAF BOMBS AND BOMBING 1939-1945 by Nina Burls 25 THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAF GUNS AND 37 AMMUNITION FROM WORLD WAR 1 TO THE
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED EDITION Welcome to the 31St Century, a Time of Endless Wars That Rage Across the Known Uni- Verse
    ® REVISED EDITION Welcome to the 31st century, a time of endless wars that rage across the known uni- verse. These epic conflicts are won and lost by BattleMechs®, 30-foot-tall, humanoid titans of metal bristling with high-intensity lasers, rapid-fire autocannon and dozens of other lethal weapons; enough firepower to level entire city blocks. Your elite force of MechWarriors® drives these juggernauts into battle, blasting at your opponent’s ’Mechs® in a deadly game of kill or be killed. Will they become instant legends, or forgotten casual- ties? Only your skill and luck will determine their fate. Drawing on years of experience, this book combines the best of the BattleTech board game into a uni- fied whole. BattleTech Master Rules is entirely restructured and streamlined; it is the same game, but like you’ve never seen it before. This book includes the complete game rules, a quick-and- easy scenario creation sys- tem, the Battle Value point system for evaluating ’Mechs and balancing forces and revised and expanded minia- tures rules. This revised edi- tion of BattleTech Master Rules has been updated to incorporate all level 2 weapons and units present- ed in various technical readouts and Field Manuals. ® TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Dropping to the Ground 21 Location After Attack 44 BattleTech Master Rules 5 Standing Up 21 Falls 44 Level Two BattleTech 6 Stacking 21 Different Elevations 44 Reader Response 6 Accidental Violation 21 Prone BattleMechs 44 COMPONENTS 7 Pavement Movement 21 Physical Attacks Units 7 Bridge Movement 22
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Night Aviation to 1919 / William Edward Fischer, Jr
    L ,j~~..NNN; ~~'~~1,_rZ, 1 ~r~~,. " " .` , , .wi~ . : . , . , . Library of Congress Catalogiing-in-Publication Data Fischer, William Edward . The development of military night aviation to 1919 / William Edward Fischer, Jr. p. cm Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Atrwarfare-History . 2. Nightflying-History . 3. World War, 1914-1918-Aerial operations . I. Title. UG625.F57 1998 358.4-dc21 98-44145 CIP Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. For Sale by the Superintendent ofDocuments US Government Printing Office Washington, D.C . 20402 11 Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . ix PREFACE . xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xiii 1 NIGHT AERONAUTICS TO AUGUST 1914 . 1 Aeronautics Clubs . 4 Military Applications . 6 Airship Development . 7 Military Trials of Airships . 1 1 Airplane Night Flying . 13 Military Night Flying . 18 Notes . 20 2 THE EMERGENCE OF NIGHT BOMBING, 1914-1916 . 25 The First Night Aviators . 27 Night Attacks . 28 Bombardment Aircraft . 29 Hazardous Aspects of Night Flying . 31 Differences in Day and Night Bombardment Aircraft . 32 Organizational Changes . 35 Notes . 38 3 TACTICAL NIGHT BOMBARDMENT . 41 Germany's Opening Offensive . 42 French Night Flights . 43 The Battle of the Somme . 44 Changes in French Aviation . 49 Britain's No. 100 Squadron . 51 Amerikaprogramm . 52 iii Chapter Page French Bombardment Aviation Reorganization . 52 Spring Offensives . 53 The Minor Role of Tactical Night Bombardment . 55 Notes . 61 4 STRATEGIC NIGHT BOMBARDMENT .
    [Show full text]
  • TM 9-1900, Ammunition, General
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE TECHNICAL ORDER AMMUNITION GENERAL DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY AND THE AIR FORCE JUNE 1956 v **** GENERAL Section I. INTRODUCTION 1. Scope a. This manual contains information pertaining to the classification and identification of ammunition. Personnel concerned with any phase of ammunition should be thoroughly familiar with the provisions of this manual and TM 9-1903. b. Information pertaining to nuclear and biological munitions has not been included in this manual, since sufficient data are not available at this time. c. The appendix contains a list of current references, including supply and technical manuals, and other publications applicable to ammunition. d. Information pertaining to care, handling, preservation, and destruc­ tion of ammunition, which appeared in the previous edition of this manual, is contained in TM 9-1903. 2. Forms The forms prescribed for use throughout the Army establishment are listed in the current DA Pam 310-2. Requisitions for these forms will be submitted in accordance with AR 310-90. 3. Reports a. Accidents. Responsibilities and procedures for preparation of reports of accidents and recording and reporting requirements for Army accidents are contained in SR 385-10-40. b. Accidents Involving Ammunition. If an accident or malfunction involv­ ing the use of ammunition, including land mines, base charges, dynamite, blasting caps, detonating cord, shaped charges, and demolition charges of all types, occurs during training or combat, the range officer for units in training, if there is one, or the senior officer of the unit in training or combat, or, if there is no officer in charge of the unit, the senior noncom­ missioned officer or enlisted man of the unit involved, will report imme­ diately the occurrence and all available facts of the accident to the technical service representative under whose supervision the ammunition for the unit involved is maintained or issued.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Britain
    IRumb, 37719 4543 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of Tuesday, the loth of September, 1946 by Registered as a newspaper WEDNESDAY, n SEPTEMBER, 1946 The Air Ministry, September, 1946. THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN. The following despatch was submitted to the Experiences in Holland and Belgium had Secretary of State for Air on August 20th, shown what they could do with armoured 1941, by Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh C. T. forces operating in conjunction with an Air Dowding, G.C.B., G.C.V.O., C.M.G., Arm which had substantially achieved the- com- A.D.Cs, Air Officer Commanding-in-Chiej, mand of the Air. Fighter Command, Royal Air Force. 5. This air supremacy was doubly necessary to them in attacking England ibecause the bulk PREAMBLE. of their troops and war material must neces- 1. I have been instructed by the Air Council sarily 'be conveyed by sea, and, in order to to write a Despatch on the Air Fighting of achieve success, they must be capable of giving last Autumn, which has become known as the' air protection to the passage and the landing " Battle of Britain." JThe conditions are a of troops and material. little unusual -because, firstly, the Battle ended 6. The destruction or paralysis of the Fighter many months ago, secondly, a popular account Command was therefore an essential pre- of the fighting has already been written and requisite to the invasion of these Islands. published, and, thirdly, recommendations for Mention in Despatches have already been 7. Their immediate objectives might be Con- submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Zvwosw a REPORT COMBAT OPERATIONS XIX TACTICAL AIR
    zvwoSW /os~ A REPORT ON THE COMBAT OPERATIONS YJJ£ c XIX TACTICAL AIR COMMAND S 1 JUL 1945 /Jo A REPORT CN THE COMBAT OPERATIONS OF THE XIX TACTICAL AIR COMMAND ******* ^ w s.AUTH: CG XIX TAC: r C *1X335 $*(%!£& COMMAND :DATES 30 May »45: I" Ivi H&till ILu ,iI,IT! z2^nMk> APO 141, U S Army 30 May 1945 INTRODUCTION In nine months of intensive air operations in coopera­ tion with the Third US Army on the Continent of Europe, the experience of the XIX Tactical Air Command proved the con­ cepts of Field Manual 100-20, "Command and Employment of Air Power," to be basically sound. Tactical missions were planned and executed in the order of priority laid down in that document: (1) Attainment and maintenance of air su­ periority. (2) Isolation of the battlefield. (3) Close air cooperation with ground units in combat. The following report, which includes pertinent standing operating procedures and other detailed documents, has been prepared with a view to showing clearly the methods of or­ ganization and operation employed to carry out the fundamen­ tal doctrine. Much of this material was compiled in the last two weeks of the war in Europe in response to a request fl*om the Army Air Forces Evaluation Board for a report on the effectiveness of close-in air cooperation. As revised, expanded, and presented here, the report deals with opera­ tions of all three types® The procedures set forth were evolved during months of combat and were in use at the close of the successful campaign in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • AMCP 706-189, Military Pyrotechnics
    AMC PAMPHLET AMCP 706-189 ENGINEERING DESIGN HANDBOOK MILITARY PYROTECHNICS SERIES PART FIVE - BIBLIOGRAPHY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND OCTOBER 1966 HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND WASHINGTON, D.C. 20315 AMC PAMPHLET 28 October 1966 No. 706-189 ENGINEERING DESIGN HANDBOOK MILITARY PYROTECHNICS SERIES PART FIVE--BIBLIOGRAPHY This pamphlet is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. (AMCRD-R) FOR THE COMMANDER; SELWYN D. SMITH, JR. Major General, USA Chief of Staff OFFICIAL: DISTRIBUTION: Special AMCP 706-189 PREFACE The Engineering Design Handbook Series of the Army Materiel Command is a coordinated series of handbooks containing basic information and funda­ mental data useful in the design and development of Army materiel and systems. The handbooks are authoritative reference books of practical information and quantitative1 facts helpful in the design and development of Army maleriel so that it will meet the tactical and the technical needs of the Armed Forces. This handbook, Military Pyrott duties, /'art Fire, Bibliography, is a support­ ing handbook for all of the handbooks in the Pyrotechnics Series. It contains a rich source of references, in addition to those specifically listed in the other handbooks of this Series. Material for this handbook was compiled by the Denver Research Institute of the University of Denver while in the process of preparing the manuscript for Military Pyrotechnics, Part One, Tluory and Application. Noteworthy in the collection of this source material was the diligent pursuance of Airs. Alta Morrison of the Denver Research Institute. This material was collected for the Engineering Handbook Office1 of Duke University, prime contractor to tin1 U.
    [Show full text]