DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference Proceedings of LFG13 Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (Editors) 2013 CSLI Publications http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/ Contents 1 Dedication 4 2 Editors’ Note 5 3 Yasir Alotaibi, Muhammad Alzaidi, Maris Camilleri, Shaimaa ElSadek and Louisa Sadler: Psychological Predicates and Verbal Complemen- tation in Arabic 6 4 I Wayan Arka: Nominal Aspect in Marori 27 5 Doug Arnold and Louisa Sadler: Displaced Dependent Constructions 48 6 Daniele Artoni and Marco Magnani: LFG Contributions in Second Language Acquisition Research: The Development of Case in Russian L2 69 7 Oleg Belyaev: Optimal Agreement at M-structure: Person in Dargwa 90 8 Ansu Berg, Rigardt Pretorius and Laurette Pretorius: The Represen- tation of Setswana Double Objects in LFG 111 9 Tina Bögel: A Prosodic Resolution of German Case Ambiguities 131 10 Kersti Börjars and John Payne: Dimensions of Variation in the Ex- pression of Functional Features: Modelling Definiteness in LFG 152 11 George Aaron Broadwell: An Emphatic Auxiliary Construction for Emotions in Copala Triqui 171 12 Özlem Çetinoglu,˘ Sina Zarrieß and Jonas Kuhn: Dependency-based Sentence Simplification for Increasing Deep LFG Parsing Coverage 191 13 Elizabeth Christie: Result XPs and the Argument-Adjunct Distinction212 14 Cheikh Bamba Dione: Valency Change and Complex Predicates in Wolof: An LFG Account 232 15 Lachlan Duncan: Non-verbal Predicates in K’ichee’ Mayan: An LFG Approach 253 16 Dag Haug: Partial Control and the Semantics of Anaphoric Control in LFG 274 17 Annette Hautli-Janisz: Moving Right Along: Motion Verb Sequences in Urdu 295 18 Petr Homola and Matt Coler: Causatives as Complex Predicates with- out the Restriction Operator 316 19 Bozhil Hristov: Defacing Agreement 335 2 20 Jonas Kuhn: On the ’Spirit of LFG’ in Current Computational Lin- guistics 356 21 Tibor Laczkó: Hungarian Particle Verbs Revisited: Representational, Derivational, and Implementational Issues from an LFG Perspective 377 22 John Lowe: (De)Selecting Arguments for Transitive and Predicated Nominals 398 23 Louise Mycock: Discourse Functions of Question Words 419 24 Louise Mycock and John Lowe: The Prosodic Marking of Discourse Functions 440 25 Prerna Nadathur: Weak Crossover and the Direct Association Hy- pothesis 461 26 Adam Przepiórkowski and Agnieszka Patejuk: The Syntax of Distance Distributivity in Polish: Weak Heads in LFG via Restriction 482 27 Ida Toivonen: English Benefactive NPs 503 3 1 Dedication We dedicate this volume of the LFG proceedings to the memory of Prof. Ivan Sag (1949-2013). Ivan Sag was the main proponent of HPSG, a constraint-based theory of gram- mar which shares architectural properties with LFG, but which works differently enough so that the contrast between LFG and HPSG has led to many spirited ex- changes and theoretical advances over the years. Everyone who knew Ivan will attest to his enthusiasm for all things linguistic, an enthusiasm that was coupled with deep linguistic insight — together they translated into linguistic work that has significantly advanced our understanding of how language works and that has put an indelible mark on the field. We personally interacted with Ivan most in our days as graduate students at Stanford (where among South Asianists, he was also known as "Mr. Spinach"). We came to know Ivan as a person who exuded bonhomie like no other professor. He cared deeply about his profession and he cared deeply about people and had a genius for networking and bringing people together (his LSA institute accommo- dation arrangements are the stuff of legends). With him, the field has lost a truly wonderful person much too soon. 4 2 Editors’ Note The program committee for LFG13 were Dag Haug and Anna Kibort. We would like to thank them for coordinating the review process and judiciously putting to- gether the program that gave rise to this collection of papers. Thanks also go to the executive committee and the abstract and final paper reviewers, without whom the conference and the proceedings would not have been possible in this form. With re- spect to the local organizing committee, we especially thank Tibor Laczkó, György Rákosi, Éva Kardos, Gábor Csernyi, who put together a superbly organized con- ference (with a wonderful accompanying social program)! Finally, as always, we would like to thank Dikran Karagueuzian for his and CSLI’s unfailing support. The table of contents lists all the papers presented at the conference. Some papers were not submitted to the proceedings. For these papers, we suggest con- tacting the authors directly. 5 PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICATES AND VERBAL COMPLEMENTATION IN ARABIC Yasir Alotaibi, Muhammad Alzaidi, Maris Camilleri Shaimaa ElSadek and Louisa Sadler University of Essex Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (Editors) 2013 CSLI Publications http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/ 6 Abstract The issue of verbal complementation patterns in the Arabic vernaculars is one which is relatively under-researched: this paper aims to make a small con- tribution in this area, focussing on essentially two issues (i) the syntax of so- called experiencer-object psychological predicates (EOPVs) (that is, predicates in the frighten or please classes) and (ii) the syntax of aspectual or phasal pred- icates (that is, verbs such as begin and continue). We argue that the latter class of verbs are in fact raising verbs and go on to show that in some dialects the interaction of EOPV and aspectual predicates permits a pattern reminiscent of Copy Raising. 1 Introduction The issue of verbal complementation patterns in the Arabic vernaculars is one which is relatively under-researched: this paper aims to make a small contribution in this area, focussing on essentially two issues (i) the syntax of so-called experiencer-object psychological predicates (EOPVs) (predicates in the frighten or please classes) and (ii) the syntax of aspectual or phasal predicates (that is, verbs such as begin and continue). Our work concentrates on the complementation patterns for these classes of verb in three geographically diverse dialects, Hijazi Arabic (a Gulf dialect from the West of Saudi Arabic, henceforth HA), Egyptian Cairene Arabic (henceforth ECA) and Mal- tese (henceforth MT). EOPVs are known to exhibit unusual properties crosslinguis- tically, and we will explore the extent to which this is true for Arabic and provide evidence that the experiencer really is a normal OBJ in this class of verbs. As for the aspectual verbs, we will argue that they are raising predicates in Arabic. We will then show that in some dialects, the interaction of EOPVs with aspectual verbs shows a pat- tern highly reminiscent of copy raising, although this in turn raises a number of open questions about the correct approach to the analysis of such constructions. Through- out, our principal aim is not theory development but a relatively detailed description of some under-studied verbal complementation patterns. 2 Psychological predicates The term psychological predicates refers to those classes of predicates with an argu- ment structure or thematic role grid involving an experiencer and a theme or stimulus argument (the content or object of the mental state). Verbs such as fear and Italian temere ‘fear’, which map their arguments so that the experiencer is the SUBJ and the theme or stimulus is the OBJ contrast sharply with verbs such as frighten or Ital- ian preoccupare ‘worry’, which exhibit the inverse mapping, with the experiencer as OBJ and the theme or stimulus as SUBJ. Furthermore this ‘inverted’ mapping occurs whether or not the stimulus is interpreted causally. A third class of verbs also exhibit- ing an apparently ‘inverse’ mapping include those which mark the experiencer with a †A version of this work was presented at the 6th International Arabic Linguistics Symposium, in Ifrane, Morocco. We thank participants at ALS and at LFG2013 and our reviewers for comments and feedback. All remaining errors are our own. 7 preposition or dative case marker, for example Italian piacere ‘please’. These classes are illustrated with the examples from Belletti and Rizzi (1988, 291).1 (1) Gianni teme questo (2) Questo preoccupa Gianni Gianni fears this this worries Gianni (3) A Gianni piace questo (4) Questo piace a Gianni to Gianni pleases this this pleases to Gianni In common with other literature we use the term EOPV to refer to predicates in both of these last two classes, that is, as a superordinate term for the frighten, preoc- cupare and the piacere classes (Belletti and Rizzi (1988)’s Classes 2 and 3). Class 3 (piacere) predicates are always stative and class 2 predicates (frighten, preoccu- pare) are usually ambiguous between stative and eventive readings. A representative sample of the class of predicates is given in Table 1. Meaning HA ECA MT anger yugdib,˙ yuzaQil - jagèdab overcome yaglib,˙ yusaitir yiglib˙ jegèleb tease/annoy/bother yuzQig,˘ yuqliq˙ yig˙¯ız, yidaayeP jdejjaq tire yatQib yetQib jgèejja hurt yagrah˘ yigrah jweg˙ga’˙ frighten yahawif˙ yixawwef˙ jbez˙za’˙ ¯ make happy/please yafarrih yifarrah, yibsit jferraè like yahib ˙ yiQgib ˙ jogègob˙ make sad yah˙zin, yuQlim yizaQQal jnikket enable yumakin˙ yiQaddar - Table 1: Experiencer Object Psych Predicates Arabic verbal morphology is characterised by a system of forms (Arabic Pawzan¯ (sg: wazn) or Hebrew binyanim (sg: binyan)) involving derivational morphological processes by which new verbal lexemes are formed. In the Western tradition, these forms (or measures) are referred to by means of roman numerals, with the Ist form be- ing the basic underived lexeme. In Arabic we find some fear-frighten pairs expressed through a change in binyan, such as ECA xaaf ‘fear’ < SUBJ OBL> (Ist binyan) and xawwef ‘frighten’ <SUBJ, OBJ> (IInd binyan) or MT beza’˙ ‘fear’ (Ist binyan) - bez˙za’˙ ‘frighten’ (IInd binyan).2 In other cases, we find that the same verbal stem 1For Belletti and Rizzi (1988) verbs in the fear class have the experiencer as an external argument, while the remaining two classes lack an external argument and associate the experiencer argument with ACC and DAT case respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections on Linguistic Fieldwork and Language Documentation in Eastern Indonesia
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 15 Reflections on Language Documentation 20 Years after Himmelmann 1998 ed. by Bradley McDonnell, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Gary Holton, pp. 256–266 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 25 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24827 Reflections on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation in eastern Indonesia Yusuf Sawaki Center for Endangered Languages Documentation, University of Papua I Wayan Arka Australia National University Udayana University In this paper, we reflect on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation activities in Eastern Indonesia. We first present the rich linguistic and biological diversity of this region, which is of significant interest in typological and theoretical linguistics and language documentation. We then discuss certain central educational issues in relation to human resources, infrastructures, and institutional support, critical for high quality research and documentation. We argue that the issues are multidimensional and complex across all levels, posing sociocultural challenges in capacity-building programs. Finally, we reflect on the significance of the participation oflocal fieldworkers and communities and their contextual training. 1. Introduction In this paper, we reflect on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation in Eastern Indonesia. By “Eastern Indonesia,” we mean the region that stretches from Nusa Tenggara to Papua,1 including Nusa Tenggara Timur, Sulawesi, and Maluku. This region is linguistically one of the most diverse regions in the world interms of the number of unrelated languages and their structural properties, further discussed in the next section. This is the region where Nikolaus Himmelmann has done his linguistic 1The term “Papua” is potentially confusing because it is used in two senses.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Structure in Sembiran Balinese I Wayan Arka Australian National University / Universitas Udayana I Nyoman Sedeng Universitas Udayana
    Chapter 5 Information structure in Sembiran Balinese I Wayan Arka Australian National University / Universitas Udayana I Nyoman Sedeng Universitas Udayana This paper discusses the information structure in Sembiran Balinese, an endangered, con- servative mountain dialect of Balinese. It presents the first detailed description of the ways topic, focus and frame setter in this language interact with each other and with other ele- ments in grammar. It is demonstrated that Sembiran Balinese employs combined strategies that exploit structural positions, morpho-lexical and syntactic resources in grammar. The description is based on a well-defined set of categories of information structure using three semantic-discourse/pragmatic features of [+/−salient], [+/−given] and [+/−contrast]. This novel approach allows for the in-depth exploration of the information structure space in Sembiran Balinese. The paper also highlights the empirical-theoretical contributions ofthe findings in terms of the significance of local socio-cultural context, and the conception of information structural prominence in grammatical theory. 1 Introduction Sembiran Balinese is one of the endangered conservative dialects of Balinese (i.e. Bali Aga, or Mountain Balinese). It is spoken by around 4,500 speakers in the mountainous village of Sembiran in northern Bali.1 Sembiran Balinese has a similar morphosyntax to Plains, or Dataran Balinese, but it is different in that it lacks the speech level system characteristics of Plains Balinese.2 The noticeable difference is therefore related tothe lexical stock, including the pronominal system, which is discussed in §2. 1SBD should be distinguished from the Plains Balinese dialect, which lexically has been influenced by many other languages, namely, Javanese, Sanskrit, English, Arabic and Indonesian.
    [Show full text]
  • Lara Mantovan Nominal Modification in Italian Sign Language Sign Languages and Deaf Communities
    Lara Mantovan Nominal Modification in Italian Sign Language Sign Languages and Deaf Communities Editors Annika Herrmann, Markus Steinbach, Ulrike Zeshan Editorial board Carlo Geraci, Rachel McKee, Victoria Nyst, Sibaji Panda, Marianne Rossi Stumpf, Felix Sze, Sandra Wood Volume 8 Lara Mantovan Nominal Modification in Italian Sign Language ISHARA PRESS ISBN 978-1-5015-1343-5 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-0485-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0481-5 ISSN 2192-516X e-ISSN 2192-5178 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin and Ishara Press, Preston, UK Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com E Pluribus Unum (uncertain origin, attributed to Virgilio, Moretum, v. 103) Acknowledgements This book is a revised version of my 2015 dissertation which was approved for the PhD degree in Linguistics at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. When I first plunged into the world of academic research, almost five years ago, I would never have imagined it was possible to achieve such an important milestone. Being so close to finalizing this book, I would like to look back briefly and remember and thank all the people who showed me the way, supported me, and encouraged me to grow both academically and personally.
    [Show full text]
  • 78206263.Pdf
    MASYARAKAT LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Didirikan pada tahun 1975, Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (MLI) merupakan organisasi profesi yang bertujuan mengembangkan studi ilmiah mengenai bahasa. PENGURUS MASYARAKAT LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Ketua : Katharina Endriati Sukamto, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Wakil Ketua : Fairul Zabadi, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Sekretaris : Ifan Iskandar, Universitas Negeri Jakarta Bendahara : Yanti, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya DEWAN EDITOR Utama : Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Pendamping : Lanny Hidajat, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Anggota : Bernd Nothofer, Universitas Frankfurt, Jerman; Ellen Rafferty, University of Wisconsin, Amerika Serikat; Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute; Tim McKinnon, Jakarta Field Station MPI; A. Chaedar Alwasilah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; E. Aminudin Aziz, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; Siti Wachidah, Universitas Negeri Jakarta; Katharina Endriati Sukamto, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; D. Edi Subroto, Universitas Sebelas Maret; I Wayan Arka, Universitas Udayana; A. Effendi Kadarisman, Universitas Negeri Malang; Bahren Umar Siregar, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; Hasan Basri, Universitas Tadulako; Yassir Nasanius, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; Dwi Noverini Djenar, Sydney University, Australia; Mahyuni, Universitas Mataram; Patrisius Djiwandono, Universitas Ma Chung; Yanti, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. JURNAL LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Linguistik Indonesia diterbitkan pertama kali pada tahun 1982 dan sejak tahun 2000 diterbitkan tiap bulan Februari dan Agustus. Linguistik Indonesia telah terakreditasi berdasarkan SK Dirjen Dikti No. 040/P/2014, 18 Februari 2014. Jurnal ilmiah ini dibagikan secara cuma-cuma kepada para anggota MLI yang keanggotaannya umumnya melalui Cabang MLI di pelbagai Perguruan Tinggi, tetapi dapat juga secara perseorangan atau institusional. Iuran per tahun adalah Rp 200.000,00 (anggota dalam negeri) dan US$30 (anggota luar negeri).
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus-Based Approach Meets LFG: the Puzzling Case of Voice Alternations of Kena-Verbs in Indonesian
    Corpus-based approach meets LFG: the puzzling case of voice alternations of kena-verbs in Indonesian Gede Primahadi W. Rajeg I Made Rajeg Universitas Udayana Universitas Udayana I Wayan Arka Australian National University/Universitas Udayana Proceedings of the LFG’20 Conference On-Line Miriam Butt, Ida Toivonen (Editors) 2020 CSLI Publications pages 307–327 http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/2020 Keywords: Lexical-Functional Grammar, quantitative corpus linguistics, voice al- ternation, Indonesian, form-meaning pairing, morphological construction Rajeg, Gede Primahadi W., Rajeg, I Made, & Arka, I Wayan. 2020. Corpus- based approach meets LFG: the puzzling case of voice alternations of kena-verbs in Indonesian. In Butt, Miriam, & Toivonen, Ida (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG’20 Conference, On-Line, 307–327. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Abstract This paper discusses the meaning-preserving hypothesis of voice alternation in Indonesian from an LFG perspective. The hypothesis predicts that the meaning encoded by a transitive verb is available for both active and passive forms, differing only in the alignment of grammatical relations and semantic roles. Using quantitative corpus linguistic analysis, we argue that voice alternation needs to be relativised to (i) a certain sense of a verb and (ii) (statistical) usage constraints of the verb’s semantics in certain voices. We also demonstrate the viability of the LFG framework and related analytical issues in capturing such empirical facts. 1 Introduction This paper describes a novel approach to the study of grammatical voice (hereafter, voice) in Indonesian by providing fresh, corpus-based evidence in support of the claim that voice alternations in a given verb, especially between active and passive, are not always a meaning-preserving phenomenon (Kroeger 2005: 271).
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter.Pdf
    Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st Century edited by Nicholas Evans and Marian Klamer Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 5 PUBLISHED AS A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96822 USA http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI PRESS 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96822-1888 USA © All texts and images are copyright to the respective authors, 2012 All chapters are licensed under Creative Commons Licenses Cover design by Susan Ford incorporating a photograph by Darja Hoenigman Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data ISBN 978-0-9856211-2-4 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4557 Contents Contributors iv 1. Introduction 1 Nicholas Evans and Marian Klamer 2. The languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the level of coverage 13 Harald Hammarström and Sebastian Nordhoff 3. Systematic typological comparison as a tool for investigating 34 language history Ger Reesink and Michael Dunn 4. Papuan-Austronesian language contact: Alorese from an areal 72 perspective Marian Klamer 5. Even more diverse than we had thought: The multiplicity of 109 Trans-Fly languages Nicholas Evans 6. Projecting morphology and agreement in Marori, an isolate of 150 southern New Guinea I Wayan Arka 7. ‘Realis’ and ‘irrealis’ in Wogeo: A valid category? 174 Mats Exter 8. From mountain talk to hidden talk: Continuity and change in 191 Awiakay registers Darja
    [Show full text]
  • Mighty Morpheme Tagging Rangers
    in Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019 Background ❖ It's hard to make crosslinguistic comparisons of RNN syntactic performance (e.g., on subject-verb agreement prediction) ➢ Languages differ in multiple typological properties ➢ Cannot hold training data constant across languages Proposal: generate synthetic data to devise a controlled experimental paradigm for studying the interaction of the inductive bias of a neural architecture with particular typological properties. Setup ❖ Data: English Penn Treebank sentences converted to Universal Dependencies scheme Example of a dependency parse tree ONE in Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019 Setup ❖ Identify all verb arguments with nsubj, nsubjpass, dobj and record plurality (HOW? manually?) Example of a dependency parse tree Setup ❖ Generate synthetic data by appending novel morphemes to the verb arguments identified to inflect them for argument role and number Setup ❖ Generate synthetic data by appending novel morphemes to the verb arguments identified to inflect them for argument role and number No explanation or motivation given for how the novel morphemes were developed, nor an explicit mention that they're novel! Might length matter? Typological properties ❖ Does jointly predicting object and subject plurality improve overall performance? ➢ Generate data with polypersonal agreement ❖ Do RNNs have inductive biases favoring certain word orders over others? ➢ Generate data with different word orders ❖ Does overt case marking influence agreement prediction? ➢ Generate data with different case marking systems ■ unambiguous, syncretic, argument marking Examples of synthetic data Task ❖ Predict a verb's subject and object plurality features. Input: synthetically-inflected sentence Output: one category prediction each for subject & object subject: [singular, plural] object: [singular, plural, none] (if no object) (It's NOT CLEAR in the paper WHAT the actual prediction task is / what the actual output space is.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Lingual Dependency Parsing: Word Representation and Joint
    Multi-Lingual Dependency Parsing : Word Representation and Joint Training for Syntactic Analysis Mathieu Dehouck To cite this version: Mathieu Dehouck. Multi-Lingual Dependency Parsing : Word Representation and Joint Training for Syntactic Analysis. Computer Science [cs]. Université de lille, 2019. English. tel-02197615 HAL Id: tel-02197615 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02197615 Submitted on 30 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille École Doctorale Sciences Pour L’Ingénieur Thèse de Doctorat Spécialité : Informatique et Applications préparée au sein de l’équipe Magnet, du laboratoire Cristal et du centre de recherche Inria Lille - Nord Europe financée par l’Université de Lille Mathieu Dehouck Multi-Lingual Dependency Parsing : Word Representation and Joint Training for Syntactic Analysis Parsing en Dépendances Multilingue : Représentation de Mots et Apprentissage Joint pour l’Analyse Syntaxique sous la direction de Dr. Marc TOMMASI et l’encadrement de Dr. Pascal DENIS Soutenue publiquement à Villeneuve d’Ascq, le 20 mai 2019 devant le jury composé de: Mme Sandra KÜBLER Indiana University Bloomington Rapportrice M. Alexis NASR Université d’Aix Marseille Rapporteur Mme Hélène TOUZET CNRS Présidente du jury M.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(2)
    JSALL 2021; aop Netra P. Paudyal and John Peterson* How one language became four: the impact of different contact-scenarios between “Sadani” and the tribal languages of Jharkhand https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2021-2028 Published online May 4, 2021 Abstract: Four Indo-Aryan linguistic varieties are spoken in the state of Jharkhand in eastern central India, Sadri/Nagpuri, Khortha, Kurmali and Panchparganiya, which are considered by most linguists to be dialects of other, larger languages of the region, such as Bhojpuri, Magahi and Maithili, although their speakers consider them to be four distinct but closely related languages, collectively referred to as “Sadani”. In the present paper, we first make use of the program COG by the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) to show that these four varieties do indeed form a distinct, compact genealogical group within the Magadhan language group of Indo- Aryan. We then go on to argue that the traditional classification of these languages as dialects of other languages appears to be based on morphosyntactic differences between these four languages and similarities with their larger neighbors such as Bhojpuri and Magahi, differences which have arisen due to the different contact situations in which they are found. Keywords: Khortha; Kudmali; language contact; Sadani; Sadri 1 Introduction While the first official language of the state of Jharkhand in eastern central India is Hindi, over 96% of the state population speaks a local tribal or regional language as their first (L1) or second language (L2) on a daily basis, and only 3.7% of the people speak Hindi as their first language (JTWRI 2013:4–5).
    [Show full text]
  • Wechsler-Current CV-Utstyle-2021
    CURRICULUM VITAE September 1, 2021 Stephen Wechsler Home: Office (mailing address): 209 W. 39th Street Department of Linguistics Austin, Texas 78751 305 E. 23rd Street STOP B5100 ph: (512) 944-6585 Austin, Texas 78712-1196 ph: (512) 471-9026 fax: (512) 471-4340 office: RLP 4.107 e-mail: [email protected] URL: https://sites.google.com/site/wechslerpublications/ Position: Department of Linguistics, The University of Texas at Austin Title: Professor Education: PhD, Linguistics, Stanford University 1991 BA, English, University of California at Berkeley 1979. Honors: Fellow of the Alma Cowden Madden Centennial Professorship in Linguistics (2013-6) Research Areas Prof. Wechsler’s main research areas are in syntactic theory, lexical semantics and argument structure, the evolution of syntax and semantic composition, the linguistics of perspective and person indexicality, and grammatical agreement. Books 1. Wechsler, Stephen 2015. Word Meaning and Syntax: Approaches to the Interface. Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology, General editor: Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 369 pages. 2. Joan Bresnan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen, and Stephen Wechsler 2015. Lexical- Functional Syntax, 2nd Edition. Blackwell Publishers. 520 pages. 3. Wechsler, Stephen and Larisa Zlatić 2003. The Many Faces of Agreement. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 239 pages. 4. Wechsler, Stephen 1995. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 157 pages. 5. Masayo Iida, Draga Zec and Stephen Wechsler (eds.) 1987. Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure: Interactions of Morphology, Syntax, and Discourse. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 238 pages. 1 6. Mary Dalrymple, Jeffrey Goldberg, Kristin Hanson, Michael Inman, Christopher Piñon, and Stephen Wechsler (eds.) 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • English for Practical Purposes 9
    ENGLISH FOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES 9 CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction of English Grammar Chapter 2: Sentence Chapter 3: Noun Chapter 4: Verb Chapter 5: Pronoun Chapter 6: Adjective Chapter 7: Adverb Chapter 8: Preposition Chapter 9: Conjunction Chapter 10: Punctuation Chapter 11: Tenses Chapter 12: Voice Chapter 1 Introduction to English grammar English grammar is the body of rules that describe the structure of expressions in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses and sentences. There are historical, social, and regional variations of English. Divergences from the grammardescribed here occur in some dialects of English. This article describes a generalized present-dayStandard English, the form of speech found in types of public discourse including broadcasting,education, entertainment, government, and news reporting, including both formal and informal speech. There are certain differences in grammar between the standard forms of British English, American English and Australian English, although these are inconspicuous compared with the lexical andpronunciation differences. Word classes and phrases There are eight word classes, or parts of speech, that are distinguished in English: nouns, determiners, pronouns, verbs, adjectives,adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions. (Determiners, traditionally classified along with adjectives, have not always been regarded as a separate part of speech.) Interjections are another word class, but these are not described here as they do not form part of theclause and sentence structure of the language. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs form open classes – word classes that readily accept new members, such as the nouncelebutante (a celebrity who frequents the fashion circles), similar relatively new words. The others are regarded as closed classes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Personal Agreement Clitics in Caucasian Albanian and Udi
    The Origins of Personal Agreement Clitics in Caucasian Albanian and Udi Wolfgang Schulze, Munich / Banská Bystrica 1. Introduction Udi, belonging to the Southeast Caucasian (Lezgian) language family (Eastern Samur branch), represents one of the best studied minority languages of this family (see Schulze (in press) for a more comprehensive survey on the history of Udi linguistics). From a typological point of view, Udi has found much interest because of its system of so-called floating agreement markers that is said to be unique among the autochthonous languages of the Eastern Caucasus. In the present paper, dedicated to the jubilee with whom I had the honor to discuss over times issues of Caucasian Albanian and Udi grammar, I want to present some new thoughts on the origins of Udi and Caucasian Albanian patterns of personal agreement. The issue has become a hotspot not only in the linguistics of East Caucasian, but also in general linguistics due to the study by Alice Harris (Harris 2002) that has served as a starting point for several theory-driven proposals to interpret these patterns (e.g. Crysmann 2000, Luís & Spencer 2006). Most of these studies are based on the analyses and hypotheses put forward by Harris (2002) and do not offer new data or new arguments concerning the history and motivation of agreement constructions in Udi. Moreover, Harris' analysis and hypotheses could not yet include data stemming the Mount Sinai palimpsests that contain texts written in Caucasian Albanian (~ 600 AD). Jost Gippert and the author of the present article who had edited these palimpsests in collaboration with Zaza Aleksidze and Jean-Pierre Mahé (Gippert et al.
    [Show full text]