Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note Leeds City Council Site Allocatio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note Leeds City Council Site Allocatio Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note 1.1 The following note has been prepared pursuant to the Appeal decision1 issued 18th June 2018 in respect of land south of Pool Road, Pool in Wharfedale. This note has been prepared to assist the SAP Inspectors and to inform of the most recent findings of the Pool Inspector relevant to the consideration of the Council’s five year supply position. A copy of the Appeal decision is appended to this note. 1.2 The decision followed a formal Public Inquiry held between 15th to 23rd May 2018. Amongst other matters, the Inquiry considered in great detail the Council’s current five year housing land supply position as of a 1st April 2018 base date. The Appeal decision therefore represents the most recent and up to date test of the Council’s five year supply. 1.3 Whilst the absence of a deliverable five year housing land supply2 was common ground at Inquiry between both the Council and the Appellants, the extent of the shortfall against the five year required remained in dispute. 1.4 At close of the Inquiry, the following points relative to five year supply were common ground between the two parties:- i. The agreed base date of the five year housing land supply assessment was 1st April 2018. The five year housing land supply period tested on appeal was therefore 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023; ii. The agreed housing requirement is taken from the adopted Core Strategy and is equivalent to 36,412 dwellings or 7,282 d/pa inclusive of shortfall accrued since the beginning of the plan period and the application of a 20% buffer; and iii. On the Council’s best evidence, no more than 4.4 years supply could be demonstrated in contrast to the Appellant’s figure of circa 3 years. 1.5 The five year housing land supply evidence put forward by the Appellants included the joint work undertaken by Johnson Mowat & ID Planning. The SAP Inspectors have been provided with a copy of the most recent iteration of this work through the jointly prepared Matter 2 Statement3. 1.6 The Council’s five year supply position tested at Pool Inquiry was derived from the 2017 SHLAA update, with site specific assumptions revised as part of a shift toward a 1st April 2018 base date. This is the same evidence base which has been put forward to the SAP examination. 1 Appeal Reference APP/N4720/W/17/3187334 2 As required by NPPF paragraph 47 3 Examination Documents List Reference M2/92/AMI Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note 1.7 Sites currently subject to existing policy constraints (i.e. Green Belt) were excluded from both parties supply assessments, given that these could not be considered ‘available now’4 until such time the SAP can be adopted. The Council’s breakdown of deliverable supply at close of the Pool Inquiry is set out within the Table below. Total Five Year Requirement 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 36,412 Annual Requirement 7,282 Identified Supply (SHLAA excl. Green Belt) 29,245 Windfall 2,500 Empty Homes 500 Demolitions -225 Total Supply 32,020 Five Year Supply 4.40 Years 1.8 The Pool Inspector’s conclusions in respect of the Council’s five year housing land supply position are set out through paragraphs 56 to 70 of the Appeal decision. Paragraph 62 sets out the Inspector’s conclusions on the Council’s claim to a supply figure of 4.4 years, and states:- “For these reasons and notwithstanding the efforts being made to accelerate housing supply, I am not convinced that the Council’s assessment of its five year housing land supply provides a realistic prospect that the quantity of housing envisaged will be delivered on the identified sites within five years.” 1.9 Paragraph 63 of the Inspector’s conclusions then follows on:- “I therefore conclude that, for the purposes of this Inquiry, the current housing land supply is somewhere between 3 and 4.4 years of the current annual requirement, probably tending towards the lower end of that range.” 1.10 A ‘halfway house’ between the two parties supply figures would be equivalent to 3.7 years. With reference however to the Inspectors final comments highlighted above, we have assumed a lower end figure broadly equivalent to 3.5 years supply has been advocated. 1.11 Taking therefore the agreed five year requirement for the period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 of 36,412 dwellings, a supply of 3.5 years would be broadly equivalent to 25,487 dwellings5. This is some 6,533 dwellings short of the 32,020 dwellings considered deliverable by the Council at the Pool Inquiry. 1.12 The overall balance between five year requirement and five year supply therefore stands at a shortfall of -10,925 dwellings6. This is the balance of deliverable supply to be demonstrated by the Council upon adoption of the SAP, i.e. newly identified ‘Phase 1 sites’ must 4 As required by NPPF Footnote 11 5 7,282 dwellings * 3.5 6 36,412 dwellings (Requirement) - 25,487 dwellings (Deliverable Supply) Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note demonstrably contribute over 10,000 units in the immediate five year period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023. 1.13 The Council have yet to publish a detailed breakdown of their supply figure, and specifically a clear calculation which demonstrates how the adoption of the SAP will deliver a five year housing land supply. This remains a significant concern put forward by others through recent Hearing Statements. As set out above, the Council’s latest supply position only very recently tested on appeal considers the Authority to be over 10,000 units short of a deliverable five year supply. 1.14 The revised March 2018 SAP Background Paper7 includes at Figure 1 a Housing Trajectory, which demonstrates cumulative completions over the plan period. The trajectory is presented in the form of a simple graph, and provides no specific breakdown of figures, though these are confirmed as being derived from the 2017 SHLAA Update. 1.15 The trajectory includes all Phase 1 SAP Allocations, including those currently within the Green Belt. Paragraph 4.4 of the Background Paper confirms an estimated contribution of 5,598 dwellings from Green Belt land by 2022/23. 1.16 Paragraph 4.4 of the Background Paper confirms that the Council anticipate a total of 47,643 dwellings to be delivered by 31st March 2023. Completions since the start of the plan period through to 31st March 2018 were agreed through common ground at the Pool Inquiry as totalling 16,157 dwellings. The Figure 1 Housing Trajectory can therefore be taken as advocating the delivery of 31,486 dwellings across the five year period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 (i.e. 47,643 dwellings less 16,157 confirmed completions). 1.17 By contrast, Table 1 of the Council’s response to the Inspectors Initial Questions8 sets out housing trajectory figures across each HMCA to year 11 of the plan. Column 3 of Table 1 provides a supply total for the period 1st April 2017 to 31st March 2023 of 35,390 dwellings. This is a six year total, not a five year total. 1.18 Completions for the 2017/18 monitoring year were confirmed at the Pool Inquiry as totalling 2,333 dwellings. If the Council’s position at Table 1 were therefore taken as being the most up to date position, the supply total for the period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 would be 33,057 dwellings9. 1.19 Whichever figure is preferred, this remains someway short of the agreed five year requirement for the period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 of 36,412 dwellings before any adjustment has been made in light of the Pool Inspector’s conclusions on the Council’s less than robust supply position. 7 Core Document Reference CDR1/4a 8 Dated 8th May 2018 9 35,390 dwellings - 2,333 completions achieved in the 2017/18 monitoring year Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Five Year Housing Land Supply Update Note Conclusions 1.20 Over recent years the Council have persistently over estimated the deliverable five year supply resulting in a number of lost s.78 appeals. Those arguments are not repeated here, however are already before the SAP Inspectors within our recent submissions10. 1.21 It is a requirement that the SAP must demonstrate a deliverable five year supply upon adoption. The correct starting point for calculating the Council’s five year supply position is the adopted 2014 Core Strategy requirement. This was agreed through common ground at the recently closed Pool Inquiry. 1.22 Whilst the Council are currently proceeding with a selective review of the Core Strategy (‘the CSSR’) which considers a lower housing figure, that figure is yet to be tested, remains subject to objections11 and can currently be given little weight. 1.23 The most appropriate base date for considering the Council’s five year supply position is 1st April 2018. The five year period is therefore 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023. Through the recently closed Pool Inquiry, the calculation of the five year requirement was common ground between the two parties and calculated as follows. Element Figure Calculation Base Requirement 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 23,500 4,700 * 5 Backlog against CS target to 31st March 2018 6,843 23,000 - 16,157 Base Requirement + Shortfall 30,343 23,500 + 6,843 20% Buffer 6,069 30,343 * 20% Total Five Year Requirement 36,412 Annual Requirement 7,282 36,412 / 5 1.24 Evidence before the SAP examination points to the Council advocating a total deliverable supply for the period 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2023 of either 31,486 or 33,057 dwellings.
Recommended publications
  • This Meanwood Valley Walk Download
    An introduction to the The Meanwood Valley has long been celebrated as a ‘green artery’ in Leeds, bringing rural countryside into the heart of the city. In this green corridor is a rich mosaic of habitats, including woodland, lowland heath, meadow, watercourses and ponds. Though much of the valley is readily accessible from local urban areas, it provides an excellent opportunity to experience and enjoy wildlife in often seemingly-remote surroundings. The valley is centred on two watercourses, the topmost being Adel Beck which rises in Bramhope, but which gives way to Meanwood Beck just south of the Outer Ring Road. The becks are home to fish, such as stone loach and bullhead, as well as the native white-clawed crayfish, which is sadly now threatened. Keep your eyes open when walking near the becks and you may be lucky to spot one of our resident kingfishers or otters. Where the becks flow between boulders and within the woodland, the cool, moist conditions provide the perfect habitat for ferns, liverworts and mosses. In contrast, the poor, free-drain - ing soils and open and exposed conditions at Adel Moor are ideal for heather and if you’re particularly lucky, you may spot the com - mon lizards which live here. Small ponds along the valley are also the breeding grounds of frogs, toads and newts, including the protected great crested newt. The woodlands that cover much of the green space in the valley provide wonderful scenes of carpets of ground flora in spring and rich colours in the autumn. Mammals such as roe deer, stoats and several species of bats make the woodland their home, together with a wide variety of bird species, from house sparrows and long-tailed tits to jays, red kites and all three native woodpecker – the great spotted, lesser spotted and green woodpecker.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthington Lawns, Pool in Wharfedale, Otley, LS21
    Arthington Lawns, Pool in Wharfedale, Otley, LS21 Arthington Lawns, Pool in Wharfedale, Otley, LS21 Asking Price: £340,000 A deceptively spacious two bedroom detached true bungalow situated in a peaceful cul de sac location, close to Pool in Wharfedale amenities. The property offers well proportioned accommodation, briefly comprising a welcoming entrance hall, dining kitchen with rear door to the garden, through living room leading into the conservatory, two double bedrooms and a bathroom. Externally, the property benefits from having an enclosed garden to the rear, a neat lawn to the front, and a driveway with ample parking leading to the detached single garage. An early viewing is recommended. Located in the sought after area of Pool in Wharfedale, having village pubs, chemist and post office/general store, plus an active sports and social club nearby provides tennis, cricket and other activities. Pool Primary School, which is highly regarded, is supported by other schools in neighbouring Otley, Harrogate, Ilkley and Guiseley. Leeds Bradford International Airport is a short drive away and there is a regular bus service to Otley, Harrogate, Leeds and Bradford. The market town of Otley provides a number of shops, supermarkets, schools and other facilities. Weeton and Menston railway stations are within easy reach. ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE The energy efficiency rating is a measure of the overall efficiency of a home. The higher the rating the more energy efficient the home is and the lower the fuel bills will be. Hunters 56-58 Kirkgate,
    [Show full text]
  • Faecal Bacteria Data from Samples Collected on the 24Th August 2020
    Faecal bacteria data from samples collected on the 24th August 2020 iWHARFE Improving water quality on the River Wharfe from Oughtershaw to the Ouse A citizen science project Faecal bacteria data from samples collected on the 24th August 2020 iWharfe is a citizen science project. It involves members of communities along the Wharfe valley, working together with the Environment Agency, Yorkshire Water and other agencies. It is funded by local donations and grants. The project was designed to provide a snapshot of water quality condi- tions along the entire length of the river on a single day and to raise awareness about water quality issues both for people and wildlife. Water samples were collected on the 24th August 2020. Here we report on results from samples analysed for faecal bacteria, the organisms in wastewater that cause gastro-intestinal illness. Executive Summary 1. The R. Wharfe “Big Health Check” on the 24th August 2020 involved five teams of citizen scien- tists taking water samples from 60 sites along the R. Wharfe at approximately the same time on the same day. 2. Although riverflow was relatively high, conditions were similar along the full length of the river. 3. Samples for faecal bacteria analysis were stored in cool boxes and hand-delivered to a collection point in Wakefield. They were analysed for E. coli and Intestinal Enterococci (IE) at ALS Ltd Cov- entry, an accredited microbiology laboratory, within 24 hours of sampling. 4. The results showed high concentrations of both E. coli and IE at sites between Buckden and Barden Bridge in Upper Wharfedale and at Beanlands Island in Ilkley, relatively low concentra- tions in Langstrothdale and in the stretch from Bolton Abbey to Ilkley Suspension Bridge, and var- iable concentrations downstream from Burley to the Ouse confluence at Cawood.
    [Show full text]
  • Otley TC Rail Study Final Report March 2004
    Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Otley Rail Link Study Final Report in association with Job number Prepared by Verified by Approved by Status Issue number Date D048006 SW / JCS FINAL 1 05/03/2004 JMP Consultants Ltd Otley Rail Link Study – Final Report Otley Rail Link Study Final Report Contents 0 Executive summary.......................................................................................0 1 Introduction....................................................................................................2 2 Study approach.............................................................................................4 3 Infrastructure elements .................................................................................6 Permanent way and earthworks............................................................................ 6 Structures ................................................................................................................. 9 Station design........................................................................................................ 10 Electrification......................................................................................................... 12 Signalling ............................................................................................................... 12 Infrastructure costs................................................................................................ 12 Summary...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adel and Wharfedale Ward
    Health profile overview for Adel and Wharfedale ward This profile presents a high level summary of health Population age structure: 21,370 in total related data sets for the Adel and Wharfedale ward. Comparison of ward and Leeds age structures July 2020. Leeds as outline, ward shaded as follows to indicate ward This ward has a GP registered population of 21,370 resident proportions living in the most deprived 5th of Leeds, mid with the majority of the ward population living in the range, least deprived 5th of Leeds. least deprived fifth of Leeds. In Leeds terms the ward is ranked second least deprived. 90-94 Females: 10,834 Males: 10,536 80-84 The age profile of this ward is very different to Leeds, 70-74 with many more elderly people and far fewer young 60-64 adults. 50-54 40-44 30-34 20-24 10-14 About deprivation in this report 0-4 Deprivation throughout England is measured using the Index of 6% 3% 0% 3% 6% Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The IMD provides a score for every part of England and we use this in Leeds to determine which Deprivation in this ward areas of Leeds are most deprived. Proportions of this population within each deprivation fifth of Leeds. July 2020. Leeds is divided into five groups from the most deprived fifth of Leeds the "deprived fifth", to the least. Because this divides 61% Leeds by MSOAs, it is a slightly generalised and removes detail in very small areas. 27% Ward deprivation scores take IMD scores for small areas, and 8% 5% weights them using population size in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • GSAL Travel Booklet V6:Layout 1 02/07/2012 10:15 Page 1
    GSAL Travel Booklet v6:Layout 1 02/07/2012 10:15 Page 1 The Grammar School at Leeds Travelling to school in style GSAL Travel Booklet v6:Layout 1 02/07/2012 10:15 Page 2 The Grammar School at Leeds Contents Introduction 3 Rose Court Shuttle Bus Service 4 Junior School and Senior School Service 6 Daily Bus Service Summary 7 Travel Zones and Prices 8 Daily Service Overview Map 9 Bay 1 GSAL 1 Roundhay 10-11 Bay 2 GSAL 2 Ilkley 12-13 Bay 3 GSAL 3 Rawdon 14-15 Bay 4 GSAL 4 Harrogate 16-17 Bay 5 GSAL 5 Guiseley 18-19 Bay 6 GSAL 6 Bramley 20-21 Bay 7 GSAL 7 Morley (Via Rose Court, Headingley) 22-23 Bay 8 GSAL 8 Pudsey 24-25 Bay 9 GSAL 9 Garforth 26-27 Bay 10 GSAL 10 South Milford 28-29 Bay 11 GSAL 11 Aberford 30-31 Late Bus Service Summary and Overview Map 32 Late Bus 1 Leeds 34 Late Bus 2 Knaresborough 35 Late Bus 3 Ilkley 36 Late Bus 4 South Milford 37 Late Bus 5 Wetherby 38 Lost Property 39 Contact Details 39 2 GSAL Travel Booklet v6:Layout 1 02/07/2012 10:15 Page 3 Introduction The Grammar School at Leeds is one of the largest schools in the UK with nearly 2,200 children travelling daily to and from school. It is a major logistical exercise to ensure our pupils arrive safely and promptly at their destinations. The school bus service is an essential part of our transport infrastructure and is used by over 700 pupils travelling across Leeds, West and North Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descendants of William Whitelock 1
    The Descendants of William Whitelock 1 William Whitelock was born on 15 Dec 1705 and died in 1774 in Sheepscar, Leeds, Yorkshire. Basic notes: He worked as a Merchant of Sheepscar, Leeds in Sheepscar, Leeds, Yorkshire. He lived at Sheepscar, Leeds, Yorkshire. William married Martha Jackson on 13 Jul 1732 in FMH Warmsworth. Martha was born on 10 Nov 1709 in Armley, Leeds, Yorkshire. They had four children: Martha, Deborah, Sarah and Isaac. Martha Whitelock. Deborah Whitelock was born on 7 Nov 1749 and died on 3 May 1827. Deborah married John Elam, son of John Elam and Mary Frankland, on 18 Jun 1778 in FMH Gildersome. John was born on 30 Dec 1748 in Leeds, Yorkshire and died on 17 Jan 1790. They had one son: John William. Basic notes: He worked as an Of Leeds. John William Elam was born on 9 Dec 1779 in Leeds, Yorkshire. Sarah Whitelock was born in 1754 and died in 1830. Sarah married James Arthington,1 son of Robert Arthington and Phebe Morley,. James was born on 9 Feb 1752 in Armley, Leeds, Yorkshire and died on 24 Apr 1833 in Hunslet Lane, Leeds, Yorkshire. Basic notes: He worked as a Linen Draper in Leeds, Yorkshire. Isaac Whitelock2 was born in 1742 and died in 1789 in Sheepscar, Leeds, Yorkshire. General Notes: Bishop Thornton? Basic notes: He worked as a Merchant of Sheepscar, Leeds. Isaac married Hannah Arthington,2 daughter of Robert Arthington and Phebe Morley, about 1786. Hannah was born in 1756 in West Halton, Craven, Yorkshire and died in 1840 in York, Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Adel Walks Booklet
    ADEL WALKS Adel Neighbourhood Forum Contact us: [email protected] Introduction Everyone talks about the greenery of Adel but very few appreciate the woods on our doorstep. We walk there regularly and it is not unusual to see no one in an hour walking through this beautiful landscape. There are many paths that cross through the woods but few clearly signposted footpaths and landmarks. Most of Adel Wood is probably not ancient woodland and throughout the woods there are the remains of boundary walls. What we are going to suggest in this leaflet are a few simple circular walks starting from either Adel Parish Church, Adel St John’s Primary School on Long Causeway or Adel Primary School on Tile Lane. There is no one route and many cross over and join other walks that mean you can spend as little as just under an hour in the woods or up to 2 – 3 hours. One of the ancient meanings of the name Adel was boggy ground so wellies or walking boots are recommended apart from long dry spells. All of the walks are safe for adults and children if approached sensibly but paths through the woods are not generally suitable for pushchairs. An approximate walking time has been given for most of the walks but this is clearly dependent very much on your own speed. We suggest trying one of the shorter walks first if you aren’t confident and use that to judge how long some of the other walks are likely to take. This leaflet has been produced on behalf of the Adel Neighbourhood Forum and we are very grateful to Ian Bond who has prepared all the descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Adel and Wharfedale Ward April 2019
    Adel and Wharfedale ward April 2019 Health profile overview for Adel and Wharfedale ward This profile presents a high level summary of health Population age structure: 21,358 in total related data sets for the Adel and Wharfedale ward. Comparison of ward and Leeds age structures January 2019. Leeds as outline, ward shaded. This ward has a GP registered population of 21,358 Mid range Most deprived 5th Least deprived 5th with the majority of the ward population living in the 100-104 Males: 10,569 Females: 10,789 least deprived fifth of Leeds. In Leeds terms the ward 90-94 is ranked third least deprived. 80-84 The age profile of this ward is very different to Leeds, 70-74 with many more elderly people and far fewer young 60-64 adults and children. 50-54 40-44 30-34 About deprivation in this report 20-24 Deprivation throughout England is measured using the Index of 10-14 Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The IMD is the result of analysis in seven 'domains': Income, employment, education, health, 0-4 crime, barriers to housing & services, and living environment. 6% 3% 0% 3% 6% The IMD provides a score for every part of England and we use Deprivation in this ward this in Leeds to determine which areas of Leeds are most Proportions of this population within each deprivation fifth of deprived. Leeds. January 2019. Leeds is divided into five groups from the most deprived fifth of 61% Leeds the "deprived fifth", to the least. Because this divides Leeds by MSOAs, it is a slightly generalised and removes detail in very small areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthington House ARTHINGTON • OTLEY • WEST YORKSHIRE
    ARTHINGTON HOUSE ARTHINGTON • OTLEY • WEST YORKSHIRE ARTHINGTON HOUSE ARTHINGTON LANE • ARTHINGTON OTLEY • WEST YORKSHIRE • LS21 1NJ Rare country house with fine buildings for conversion and 63 acres Freehold Entrance hall • Stair hall • Drawing room Dining room • Sitting room • Garden room Study • Kitchen • Cellars • Cloakroom Master bedroom with en suite dressing/bathroom 4 further bedrooms • 2 bathrooms 2 further potential bedrooms Attics Rear courtyard with grand barn • Stables Former cottage • Extensive stores Outbuildings and agricultural buildings Gardens & grounds About 63 acres of grazing Savills York Savills Country Department Ground Floor, 14 Merchants Place, 33 Margaret Street Merchantgate, York YO1 9TU London, WC1 0JD +44 (0) 1904 617 820 +44 (0) 207 016 3780 [email protected] [email protected] savills.co.uk These particulars are only a guide and must not be relied on as a statement of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of text. Location Arthington House is set in glorious countryside, just outside of Arthington Manchester, and further afield. Many services make the journey to Kings The house has been a home for the last 44 years to the same family. The Village approximately 10 miles equidistant between Harrogate and Leeds. Cross in under 2¼ hours. principal rooms are exceptionally light and flow with an easy formality that Leeds Bradford International Airport is just over 4 miles away. will work for the next generation. The nearby village, Pool- in-Wharfedale has two pubs, a post office, petrol The Property The elegantly proportioned reception rooms have a wealth of period features, station and primary school (Ofsted rating Good 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Tram-Trains Or Heavy Rail
    Harrogate Line: Tram-Trains or Heavy Rail A summary of the advantages & disadvantages of alternative rolling stock on the Harrogate Line between Leeds, Harrogate and the Airport TRAM-TRAIN DIRECT TO THE AIRPORT? This paper outlines the current plans and initiatives already being implemented for the Leeds-Harrogate- York rail corridor which could be jeopardised by the Tram-trains proposed by Greg Mulholland MP for Leeds North-West. He proposes that new tram-trains should be used on street-running track within Leeds City Centre, which would then share the Harrogate Line heavy rail track to beyond Horsforth where a new light rail track would be laid up to the Airport Terminal Building and potentially onward to Bradford. The disadvantages of tram-trains are summarised on pages 2 & 3. HARROGATE LINE PLANS CURRENTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED • The existing 30 min. frequency services between Leeds and Harrogate are being enhanced to an all-day 15 min. frequency in the current Northern Rail franchise from December 2017. • It is expected that a 10 minute frequency will be required to meet peak demand during the next decade. • The planned rolling stock will be provided using refurbished 100mph Class 170 diesel multiple units (DMUs) cascaded from Scotrail plus refurbished Class 150 DMUs from the existing Northern Rail fleet. These will provide a significant increase in the net volume of seats available to commuters when the new timetable is implemented in [2018] • Virgin Trains East Coast will also operate new services between London and Harrogate at two- hourly intervals from 2019. These will be operated using the new high speed IEP trains now being built by Hitachi.
    [Show full text]
  • New Railway Stations in North and West Yorkshire Feasibility Study Final Report West Yorkshire Combined Authority
    New Railway Stations in North and West Yorkshire Feasibility Study Final Report West Yorkshire Combined Authority 14 October 2014 New Railway Stations in North and West Yorkshire Feasibility Study Final Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for West Yorkshire Combined Authority‟s information and use in relation to a feasibility study assessing new railway station locations in North and West Yorkshire. Atkins Ltd assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 66 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5124741 Document ref: Metro New Railway Stations Study Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 0.1 Draft for client comment JB,CW CW JT JT 07/03/2014 Rev 0.2 Revised draft CW CW JT JT 23/06/2014 incorporating initial client comments and two additional Stage 2 sites Rev 1.0 Final report CW CW JT JT 14//10/14 Atkins Final Report | Version 1.0 | 14 October 2014 | 5124741 2 New Railway Stations in North and West Yorkshire Feasibility Study Final Report Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 6 Background 6 Study Context 6 Report Structure 6 2. Site Locations 7 3. Assessment Methodology 9 Stage 1 – Preliminary Sift 9 Identifying the Initial Shortlist (End of Stage 1) 13 Stage 2 – Detailed Feasibility Assessment 15 End of Stage 2 - Final Shortlist 16 4. Stage 1 Assessment – Preliminary Sift 17 Stage 1 Assessment Results Summary by Line 17 Shortlisted Sites for Stage 2 29 5.
    [Show full text]