Whitechapel, C1870- C1900: Crime, Policing and the Inner City

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whitechapel, C1870- C1900: Crime, Policing and the Inner City Whitechapel, c1870- c1900: Crime, policing and the inner city. The Whitechapel part of the course is a historic environment study. This means that it will focus on an environment- Whitechapel, for a specific period of time; in this case 30 years. It will be examined in Paper 1, which will also cover the rest of the Crime and Punishment course. The Whitechapel part of the paper will be at the start of paper 1, there will be three questions in this part. Two of the questions are source based, the use of sources are very important to this unit. Whitechapel is a district in the East End of London. It was a hive of beggars, prostitutes, criminals and alcoholics. There was widespread unemployment. Perhaps up to 1 in 30 people were homeless. Social reformer Charles Booth investigated East End living conditions between 1889-1903 and found that 37.5% East Londoners were living in utter poverty. The police were rarely ready to deal with crime. For example this was a time that Jack the Ripper operated in the East End of London. This was the context that the H Division (the police division that was in charge of Whitechapel) of the Metropolitan Police had to operate. In this session we will look at the context of Whitechapel. What Whitechapel was like at the time of the famous Jack the Ripper murders. We will explore: - The issues relating to poverty in Whitechapel. - Problems with housing. - How to answer question 1. Source A: This is the map produced by social reformer Charles Booth. What can we learn from the map? ‘The Five’ by Hallie Rubenhold tells the story of Whitechapel through the lives of the five victims of Jack the Ripper. As you read through the passage, highlight important details linked to poverty, employment, immigration, living conditions, crime. Definitions: Notorious: famous or well known typically for something bad. Social reformer: someone who wants social change- usually better conditions for people. sordid: bad/ dirty Whitechapel was the most notorious of these What does this text [London’s poorer areas], but was by no Do any of these key suggest life in means the only sink of poverty in the capital. Whitechapel was like? As social reformer Charles Booth’s extensive features tell us study of London’s impoverished areas in the anything about crime 78000 - Packed in- 1890s revealed, pockets of destitution, crime or problems with crammed in and misery flourished throughout the policing? metropolis, even within otherwise comfortable areas. However, Whitechapel’s Would need a lot of police. reputation [was] the most sordid. By the end of the nineteenth century, 78000 souls were packed into a quarter of warehouses, lodging houses, factories, sweat shops, abattoirs, ‘furnished rooms’, pubs, cheap music halls and markets. [. .] Booth’s social investigators regarded these residents as fairly uniform in terms of their social class. With a number of middle-class exceptions, a significant percentage were identified as ‘poor’, ‘very poor’ or ‘semi-criminal’. Housing and Living Conditions in Whitechapel Task: In the poorer areas of the city such as Whitechapel the housing was 1. Highlight the 2 most terrible. Long rows of terraced houses were built to accommodate important details in each the massive influx of workers to the factories. There was no paragraph. sanitation and sewage ran openly through the overcrowded, streets. Added to this there were very few street lamps in the poorer areas. 2. What impact would this have Several different people would sleep in the same room, sometimes on living conditions in from different families. These people would also use the same toilet Whitechapel? which landlords refused to pay to have emptied. This resulted in the spreading of diseases such as cholera and diphtheria. London was an industrial city and suffered from pollution. The smoke and stinking gas fumes choked the streets so badly that at times it was not even possible to see your own hand in front of your face, this was known as smog (smoke and fog) Londoners called this smog ‘peasoup’ due to its thick, soft-green appearance. Rookeries- A rookery is a slum- an area of overcrowded poor housing. Task- In 1870 Flower and Dean Street was a well-known rookery. Flower and Dean street had a The historian Jerry White used the 1871 census to work out number of ‘doss houses’ this that there were 902 lodgers staying in 31 of the ‘doss houses’ on this street alone. Some of these houses dated back to late meant that the lodger would pay 1600 and they were in a terrible condition. Their yards had per night, it was not a permanent been built over to provide more rooms and at the front the place to live. street was narrow – only 16 feet at its widest part in the middle. There were outside toilets, but buckets and pots were used indoors, and often spilled. Some lodging were more 1. How does having more doss settled, but families moved on after a few days or weeks, houses link to more crime? perhaps because they couldn’t afford the rent, or because they moved to find other work. Due to this the worst doss houses, Flower and Dean Street had a terrible reputation as a haunt of thieves, drunkards and prostitutes. On Source A Flower and Dean Street is coloured in black showing it was a ‘vicious semi-criminal area’, but if you look very closely you can see that ‘well-to-do’ families lived very nearby. Workhouses Those who were unable to afford a bed for the night in a doss house, or who were too young, too old and too unwell to work, could go to the Task: Which were the three Workhouse. However, people were very reluctant to go to for help at the Workhouse because of the strict rules that dictated what people harshest rules of the ate, how they worked, the time they went to bed and when they got up. workhouse? Those with families were segregated from their children and their wives 1. or husbands and for much of the time were not even allowed to speak to one another. Parents were only allowed to see their children once a day. The Whitechapel Workhouse was at South Grove, to the east, just 2. off Mile End Road. In the centre of Whitechapel at Buck’s Row there was a Workhouse Infirmary for the sick which could take around 400 inmates, and across the road at St Thomas’s Street there was a 3. ‘Casual Ward’. The Casual Ward, for those who wanted a bed for one night, only had spaces for around 60 people. The rules of the Casual Ward were very harsh – inmates were expected to work to earn their bed for the night. They would be made to pick oakum, which means picking apart the fibres of old rope, or they could be asked to work in the kitchens or to clean the Workhouse. It was thought that otherwise the inmates would be tempted to stay on at the expense of the taxpayers, who funded the Workhouse Union. One feature of accommodation for poor people in Whitechapel was lodging houses. Lodging houses were not permanent instead people paid per night. Another feature of accommodation for poor people was slum housing in rookeries. Slum housing in Whitechapel was overcrowded, they had poor ventilation. They had no toilets, there was lice in the walls. Task- Use my example to complete your own question 1, 4 mark question. 1. Describe two features of workhouses in Whitechapel. Feature 1. Feature 2. Whitechapel 2 2 In this session we will: - Understand the attempts to improve housing in Whitechapel: the Peabody estate - To be able to consider the role of lodging houses - To understand why people did not leave Whitechapel. Lodging Houses As you read through the passage, from ‘The Five’ by Hallie Rubenhold, highlight important details about life in a lodging house. In the margins you can make inferences about how the highlighted details lead to issues for the police. Task- How could this lead to The lodging houses provided temporary homes for the homeless, issues for the police? who divided their nights between the reeking (smelling) beds on offer here, the oppression of the workhouse casual wards and sleeping on the street. They were the haunts of beggars, criminals, prostitutes, chronic alcoholics, the unemployed, the sick and old. In Whitechapel alone there were 233 common lodging houses which accommodated an estimated 8,530 people without homes. Four pence per night could buy a hard single bed, 8 pence a double, there were single sex and mixed sex housing. All lodgers were entitled to make use of the communal kitchen. Social investigators and reformers who sat at the kitchen tables were appalled by the grotesque manners and the horrific language heard, even from the children. However it was the violent behaviour, degrading filth and overflowing toilets in addition to the drunkenness, child neglect Task- How could these issues and free sexual intercourse to which they truly objected. In the lead to issues for the police? ‘doss house’ all that was offensive about the slum was concentrated under one roof. The police and reformers were especially concerned about the link between common lodging houses and prostitution. Lodging houses provided shelter for a variety of women facing an assortment of unfortunate circumstances. While some of them resorted to ‘casual prostitution’ to broadly assume that all did is categorically wrong. Pairing up with a male partner was also an essential part of defraying costs. Often these relationships were short lived and formed out of necessity.
Recommended publications
  • Land Adjacent to 16 Beardell Street, Crystal Palace, London SE19 1TP Freehold Development Site with Planning Permission for 5 Apartments View More Information
    CGI of proposed Land adjacent to 16 Beardell Street, Crystal Palace, London SE19 1TP Freehold development site with planning permission for 5 apartments View more information... Land adjacent to 16 Beardell Street, Crystal Palace, London SE19 1TP Home Description Location Planning Terms View all of our instructions here... III III • Vacant freehold plot • Sold with planning permission for 5 apartments • Contemporary 3 storey block • Well-located close by to Crystal Palace ‘triangle’ and Railway Station • OIEO £950,000 F/H DESCRIPTION An opportunity to acquire a freehold development site sold with planning permission for the erection for a 3 storey block comprising 5 apartments (2 x studio, 2 x 2 bed & 1 x 3 bed). LOCATION Positioned on Beardell Street the property is located in the heart of affluent Crystal Palace town centre directly adjacent to the popular Crystal Palace ‘triangle’ which offers an array of independent shops, restaurants and bars mixed in with typical high street amenities. In terms of transport, the property is located 0.5 miles away from Crystal Palace Station which provides commuters with National Rail services to London Bridge, London Victoria, West Croydon, and Beckenham Junction and London Overground services between Highbury and Islington (via New Cross) and Whitechapel. E: [email protected] W: acorncommercial.co.uk 120 Bermondsey Street, 1 Sherman Road, London SE1 3TX Bromley, Kent BR1 3JH T: 020 7089 6555 T: 020 8315 5454 Land adjacent to 16 Beardell Street, Crystal Palace, London SE19 1TP Home Description Location Planning Terms View all of our instructions here... III III PLANNING The property has been granted planning permission by Lambeth Council (subject to S106 agreement which has now been agreed) for the ‘Erection of 3 storey building plus basement including a front lightwell to provide 5 residential units, together with provision of cycle stores, refuse/recycling storages and private gardens.’ Under ref: 18/00001/FUL.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of RELEASE of TRUSTEES. O O No
    NOTICE OF RELEASE OF TRUSTEES. o o No. of o Debtor's Name. Debtor's Address. Debtor's Description. Court. Matter. Trustee's Name. Trustee's Address. Trustee's Description. Date ot Release. Ball, William 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, and 17, Tauntqn- Cab Proprietor High Court of Justice 890 William Rooke 11, Milk-street-buildings, Accountant Nov. 28, 1888 mews, Dorset-square, Middlesex in Bankruptcy of 18SG Cheapside, London Bunting, William Goggs 9, Penywern-road, Earl's Court, Fancy Box Manufac- High Court of Justice 738 Henry John Leslie ... 4, Coleman-street, Lon- Chartered Account- Nov. 29, 1888 (otherwise De Bunting, Middlesex turer in Bankruptcy of 1885 don ant H W. G.) W Rl Campbell, Percy 5, Drapers'-gardens, Throgmorton- Stockbroker High Court of Justice 492 Horace Woodburn 4, Coloman- street, Lon- Chartered Account- Nov. 29, 1888 street, London in Bankruptcy of 1885 Kirby don, E.C. ant t-i O Coulter, Thomas W. Late of 62, Carter-lane, E.C. Coulter, Charles 'A., and ... Late of 62, Carter-lane, E.C. ^ Ennery, L. D Late of 62, Carter-lane, E.G. u (trading as o Coulters and Co.) Lately trading at 62, Carter-lane, Shippers and Mer- High Court of Justice 1249 Frederick Adolphus 82, Queen-street, Cheap- Chartered Account- Nov. 29, 1888 London, and residing at 54, chants ' in Bankruptcy of 1886 Rawlings side, E.C. ant Addison-road, Kensington, Mid- dlesex • Cox, William Joseph 253, Portobello-road, Netting Hill, Upholsterer and Cabi- High Court of Justice 951 Pullam Markham 2, Gresham - buildings, Chartered Account- Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Social Housing
    Building for our future A vision for social housing The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing Building for our future: a vision for social housing 2 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Contents Contents The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing For more information on the research that 2 Foreword informs this report, 4 Our commissioners see: Shelter.org.uk/ socialhousing 6 Executive summary Chapter 1 The housing crisis Chapter 2 How have we got here? Some names have been 16 The Grenfell Tower fire: p22 p46 changed to protect the the background to the commission identity of individuals Chapter 1 22 The housing crisis Chapter 2 46 How have we got here? Chapter 3 56 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 3 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 4 The consequences of the decline p56 p70 Chapter 4 70 The consequences of the decline Chapter 5 86 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 90 Reforming social renting Chapter 7 Chapter 5 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 Reforming social renting 102 Reforming private renting p86 p90 Chapter 8 112 Building more social housing Recommendations 138 Recommendations Chapter 7 Reforming private renting Chapter 8 Building more social housing Recommendations p102 p112 p138 4 Building for our future: a vision for social housing 5 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Foreword Foreword Foreword Reverend Dr Mike Long, Chair of the commission In January 2018, the housing and homelessness charity For social housing to work as it should, a broad political Shelter brought together sixteen commissioners from consensus is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Philanthropy in the East
    KATHARINE MARIE BRADLEY POVERTY AND PHILANTHROPY IN EAST LONDON 1918 – 1959: THE UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENTS AND THE URBAN WORKING CLASSES UNIVERSITY OF LONDON PhD IN HISTORY CENTRE FOR CONTEMPORARY BRITISH HISTORY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF LONDON The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. ABSTRACT This thesis explores the relationship between the university settlements and the East London communities through an analysis their key areas of work during the period: healthcare, youth work, juvenile courts, adult education and the arts. The university settlements, which brought young graduates to live and work in impoverished areas, had a fundamental influence of the development of the welfare state. This occurred through their alumni going on to enter the Civil Service and politics, and through the settlements’ ability to powerfully convey the practical experience of voluntary work in the East End to policy makers. The period 1918 – 1959 marks a significant phase in this relationship, with the economic depression, the Second World War and formative welfare state having a significant impact upon the settlements and the communities around them. This thesis draws together the history of these charities with an exploration of the complex networking relationships between local and national politicians, philanthropists, social researchers and the voluntary sector in the period. This thesis argues that work on the ground, an influential dissemination network and the settlements’ experience of both enabled them to influence the formation of national social policy in the period.
    [Show full text]
  • London Kings Cross Station – Zone 1 I Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map
    London Kings Cross Station – Zone 1 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map 1 35 Wellington OUTRAM PLACE 259 T 2 HAVELOCK STREET Caledonian Road & Barnsbury CAMLEY STREET 25 Square Edmonton Green S Lewis D 16 L Bus Station Games 58 E 22 Cubitt I BEMERTON STREET Regent’ F Court S EDMONTON 103 Park N 214 B R Y D O N W O Upper Edmonton Canal C Highgate Village A s E Angel Corner Plimsoll Building B for Silver Street 102 8 1 A DELHI STREET HIGHGATE White Hart Lane - King’s Cross Academy & LK Northumberland OBLIQUE 11 Highgate West Hill 476 Frank Barnes School CLAY TON CRESCENT MATILDA STREET BRIDGE P R I C E S Park M E W S for Deaf Children 1 Lewis Carroll Crouch End 214 144 Children’s Library 91 Broadway Bruce Grove 30 Parliament Hill Fields LEWIS 170 16 130 HANDYSIDE 1 114 CUBITT 232 102 GRANARY STREET SQUARE STREET COPENHAGEN STREET Royal Free Hospital COPENHAGEN STREET BOADICEA STREE YOR West 181 212 for Hampstead Heath Tottenham Western YORK WAY 265 K W St. Pancras 142 191 Hornsey Rise Town Hall Transit Shed Handyside 1 Blessed Sacrament Kentish Town T Hospital Canopy AY RC Church C O U R T Kentish HOLLOWAY Seven Sisters Town West Kentish Town 390 17 Finsbury Park Manor House Blessed Sacrament16 St. Pancras T S Hampstead East I B E N Post Ofce Archway Hospital E R G A R D Catholic Primary Barnsbury Handyside TREATY STREET Upper Holloway School Kentish Town Road Western University of Canopy 126 Estate Holloway 1 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreditch E1 01–02 the Building
    168 SHOREDITCH HIGH ST. SHOREDITCH E1 01–02 THE BUILDING 168 Shoreditch High Street offers up to 35,819 sq ft of contemporary workspace over six floors in Shoreditch’s most sought after location. High quality architectural materials are used throughout, including linear handmade bricks and black powder coated windows. Whilst the top two floors use curtain walling with black vertical fins – altogether a dramatic first impression for visitors on arrival. The interior is designed with dynamic businesses in mind – providing a stunning, light environment in which to work and create. STELLAR WORK SPACE 03–04 SHOREDITCH Shoreditch is still the undisputed home of the creative and tech industries – but has in recent years attracted other business sectors who crave the vibrant local environment, diverse amenity offering and entrepreneurial spirit. ORIGINALS ARTISTS VISIONARIES HOXTON Crondall St. d. Rd R st nd . Ea la s ng Ki xton St Ho . 05–06 SHOREDITCH Columbia Rd St Hoxton Sq. Rd 6 y d. R Pitfield ckne t s Ha Ea k Pl. Brunswic City 5 R d. 5 Cu St. d r Ol ta Calv et Ave i . 4 n Rivington Rd. Rd WALK TIMES . Arnold Circus. 3 11 OLD ST. 8 8 4 3 6 5 12 SHOREDITCH HIGH ST. STATION 7 MINS Shor 03 9 Gr 168 edit Leonard St. eat 1 10 1 E New Yard Inn. ch High . aste 4 6 7 11 2 Rd 2 10 h St. OLD SPITALFIELD MARKET . 2 churc een t rn 3 Red 4 MINS . 1 9 S St 9 07 8 .
    [Show full text]
  • Retail & Leisure Opportunities for Lease
    A NEW VIBRANT COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL HUB IN SHOREDITCH Retail & Leisure Opportunities For Lease SHOREDITCH EXCHANGE, HACKNEY ROAD, LONDON E2 LOCATION One of London’s most creatively dynamic and WALKING TIMES culturally vibrant boroughs, Shoreditch is the 2 MINS Hoxton ultimate destination for modern city living. Within 11 MINS Shoreditch High Street walking distance of the City, the area is also 13 MINS Old Street superbly connected to the rest of London and beyond. 17 MINS Liverpool Street The development is situated on the north side of LONDON UNDERGROUND Hackney Road close to the junction of Diss Street from Old Street and Cremer Street. 3 MINS Bank 5 MINS King’s Cross St Pancras The immediate area boasts many popular 5 MINS London Bridge restaurants, gyms, independent shops, bars and 11 MINS Farringdon cafes including; The Blues Kitchen, Looking Glass 14 MINS Oxford Circus Cocktail Club, The Bike Shed Motorcycle Club. 18 MINS Victoria The famous Columbia Road Flower Market is just 19 MINS Bond Street a 3 minute walk away and it’s only a 5 minute walk to the heart of Shoreditch where there’s Boxpark, Dishoom and countless more bars, shops and LONDON OVERGROUND restaurants. from Hoxton 10 MINS Highbury & Islington Bordering London’s City district, local transport 12 MINS Canada Water links are very strong with easy access to all the 14 MINS Surrey Quays major hubs of the West End and City. Numerous 29 MINS Hampstead Heath bus routes pass along Hackney Road itself which Source: Google maps and TFL also provides excellent links. Hoxton Overground station is just a 2 minute walk away.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Fact Book Former Whitechapel Bell Foundry Site Whitechapel, London
    Campaign Fact Book Former Whitechapel Bell Foundry Site Whitechapel, London Compiled January 2020 Whitechapel Bell Foundry: a matter of national importance This fact book has been compiled to capture the breadth of the campaign to save the site of the Whitechapel Bell Foundry, which is currently threatened by a proposal for conversion into a boutique hotel. Re-Form Heritage; Factum Foundation; numerous community, heritage and bellringing organisations; and thousands of individuals have contributed to and driven this campaign, which is working to: reinstate modern and sustainable foundry activity on the site preserve and record heritage skills integrate new technologies with traditional foundry techniques maintain and build pride in Whitechapel’s bell founding heritage The site of the Whitechapel Bell Foundry is Britain’s oldest single-purpose industrial building where for generations bells such as Big Ben, the Liberty Bell, Bow Bells and many of the world’s great bells were made. Bells made in Whitechapel have become the voices of nations, marking the world’s celebrations and sorrows and representing principles of emancipation, freedom of expression and justice. As such these buildings and the uses that have for centuries gone on within them represent some of the most important intangible cultural heritage and are therefore of international significance. Once the use of the site as a foundry has gone it has gone forever. The potential impact of this loss has led to considerable concern and opposition being expressed on an unprecedented scale within the local area, nationally and, indeed, internationally. People from across the local community, London and the world have voiced their strong opposition to the developer’s plans and to the hotel use and wish for the foundry use to be retained.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechapel Mile End Bow Road Bow Church Stepney Green Aldgate
    Barclays Cycle Superhighway Route 2 Upgrade This map shows some of the main changes proposed along the route. For detailed proposals, visit tfl.gov.uk/cs2upgrade No right turn from Whitechapel Road Bus lane hours of operation into Stepney Green changed to Mon-Sat, 4pm-7pm No right turn from between Vallance Road and Whitechapel High Street Cambridge Heath Road into Leman Street N ST. BOTOLPH Whitechapel Stepney Green STREET VALLANCE ROAD VALLANCE GLOBE ROAD GLOBE OSBORN STREET Aldgate STREETCOMMERCIAL CAMBRIDGE HEATH ROAD WHITECHAPEL ROAD City of London Aldgate scheme COMMERCIAL ROAD The Royal London Aldgate Hospital East FIELDGATE STREET NEW ROAD LEMAN STREET LEMAN SIDNEY STREET STEPNEY GREEN STEPNEY MANSELL STREET MANSELL Continued below Continued No right turn from Mile End Road into Burdett Road NORTHERN APPROACH NORTHERN RIVER LEA RIVER Queen Mary University of London FAIRFIELD ROAD FAIRFIELD GROVE ROAD GROVE COBORN ROAD COBORN Continued above CS2 continues MILE END ROAD BOW ROAD HIGH STREET to Stratford Mile End Bow Road Bow Church BROMLEY HIGH STREET No right turn from TUNNEL CAMPBELL ROAD CAMPBELL BURDETTROAD HARFORD STREET HARFORD REGENT’S CANAL Burdett Road into Bow Road MORNINGTON GROVE BLACKWALL Kerb-separated cycle track New bus stop Major upgrade to junction Changes to be proposed under Vision for Bow scheme Wand-separated cycle lane Bus stop removed Other road upgrade scheme .
    [Show full text]
  • East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing Sarah Glynn 2004
    East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing Sarah Glynn 2004 East End Immigrants and the Battle for Housing: a comparative study of political mobilisation in the Jewish and Bengali communities The final version of this paper was published in the Journal of Historical Geography 31 pp 528­ 545 (2005) Abstract Twice in the recent history of the East End of London, the fight for decent housing has become part of a bigger political battle. These two very different struggles are representative of two important periods in radical politics – the class politics, tempered by popular­frontism that operated in the 1930s, and the new social movement politics of the seventies. In the rent strikes of the 1930s the ultimate goal was Communism. Although the local Party was disproportionately Jewish, Communist theory required an outward looking orientation that embraced the whole of the working class. In the squatting movement of the 1970s political organisers attempted to steer the Bengalis onto the path of Black Radicalism, championing separate organisation and turning the community inwards. An examination of the implementation and consequences of these different movements can help us to understand the possibilities and problems for the transformation of grass­roots activism into a broader political force, and the processes of political mobilisation of ethnic minority groups. Key Words Tower Hamlets, political mobilisation, oral history, Bengalis, Jews, housing In London’s East End, housing crises are endemic. The fight for adequate and decent housing is fundamental, but for most of those taking part its goals do not extend beyond the satisfaction of housing needs.
    [Show full text]
  • East End Newspaper Reports
    University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: MS 169 Title: East End Newspaper Reports Scope: Notes, transcripts and xerox copies of reports relating to Jewish immigration from a range of London East End newspapers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Dates: 1880-1910 Level: Fonds Extent: 20 boxes (28 files) Name of creator: Joseph John Bennett Administrative / biographical history: From the early 1880s, as a consequence of violent anti-semitism in some countries of Eastern Europe such as Russia and Bulgaria, the immigration of Jews into Britain assumed politically significant dimensions, and brought with it hostility and antagonism within some sections of the host population. The East End of London, in areas like Whitechapel, was the main focus of such immigration. East End newspapers of the period carried many reports of related incidents and opinions. In 1905 the Aliens Act, intended to restrict ‘pauper’ and ‘undesirable’ aliens was passed. The material in this collection of notes, transcripts and newspaper reports was compiled by Joseph John Bennett during research in pursuance of the degree of M.Phil. (1979) at the University of Sheffield (thesis entitled East End newspaper opinion and Jewish immigration, 1885-1905). Related collections: Zaidman Papers Source: Presented to the University Library by the author on completion of his research. System of arrangement: As received Subjects: Antisemitism - Great Britain; Jews in Great Britain; England - Emigration and immigration Names: Bennett, John Joseph; London - East End Conditions of access: Academic researchers by appointment Restrictions: No restrictions Copyright: Copyright of the author’s work remains with the author; newspaper reports are covered by Copyright legislation Finding aids: There is a finding list of the files, the newspapers used and their dates, but no detailed index.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty, Wealth and History in the East End of London : Life and Work
    Poverty, Wealth and History in the East End of London : Life and Work Part 3 : Labour and Toil Assessment 2 : The Standard of Living Author : Paul Johnson How can we assess the standard of living in the East End and what kind of comparisons can we make? Using a variety of sources creatively and knowing what sources you need to solve a problem are among the essential skills of a historian. We have provided you with: 1. A table listing the average wage and expenditures in the 1880s and 2000 2. An article tha t appeared in The Builder periodical in 1871 about the dwellings of the poor in Bethnal Green 3. Images from the Illustrated London News detailing life in the East End of London Find out how well equipped you are to assess the standard of living in the East End of London by answering the questions below and comparing your answers to Paul's thoughts. “Homes in the East of London”, The Builder, 28th January 1871 The average income and expenditure in the 1880s and 2000. P. Wilser, The Pound in Your Pocket, 1870-1970, Peter Wilser 1970; J. McGinty and T. Williams (Eds.) National Statistics. Regional Trends, 2001 ed., London: The Stationery Office We traversed several alleys and courts, dirty and dismal, the denizens of which told their own tales in their pallid faces and tattered raiment. Here and about, the pavement of the streets, the flagging of the paths, the condition of the side channels, and the general state of the entries and back-yards are unendurably bad.
    [Show full text]