DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Review Feasibility Study, Volume I, Contract No. X-312, A.O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Review Feasibility Study, Volume I, Contract No. X-312, A.O TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC REVIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT VOLUME I CONTRACT NO. X-312 A. O. POLYMER SITE SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PREPARED FOR: STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS SITE MITIGATION TRENTON, NEW JERSEY APRIL, 1991 Rob'nson Plaza II. Suite 2OO, Pittsburgh, PA 152Q5 2] 7SB-32OC PUBLIC REVIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT VOLUME I CONTRACT NO. X-312 A. O. POLYMER SITE SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PREPARED FOR: STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS SITE MITIGATION TRENTON, NEW JERSEY APRIL, 1991 PREPARED BY: ICF TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED Robinson Plaza II, Suite 200 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205 O O o vo TABLE OF CONTENTS A.O. POLYMER SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY VOLUME I Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Organization of Report ......... 1-1 1.2 Site Background Information ............. 1-2 1.2.1 Site Description .............. 1-2 1.2.2 Site History ................ 1-7 1.2.3 Environmental Setting ............ 1-8 1.3 Nature and Extent of Contamination ......... 1-13 1.3.1 Source ................... 1-13 1.3.2 Soil .................... 1-13 1.3.3 Groundwater ................. 1-15 1.3.4 Potable Wells ................ 1-22 1.3.5 Surface Water ................. 1-22 1.3.6 Sediment .................. 1-23 1.4 Baseline Risk Assessment .............. 1-24 1.4.1 Human Health Assessment ........... 1-24 1.4.2 Environmental Assessment .......... 1-28 2.0 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES ................ 2-1 2.1 Exposure Pathways, Media and Contaminants to be Addressed ................... 2-1 2.2 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) ................ 2-3 2.2.1 Consideration of ARARs ........... 2-3 2.2.2 Potentially Applicable ARARs ........ 2-5 2.2.3 Remediation Goals .............. 2-11 2.3 Remedial Action Objectives ............. 2-11 2.3.1 Source Control Objectives .......... 2-20 2.3.2 Management of Migration Objectives ..... 2-20 3.0 IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES ... 3-1 3.1 General Response Actions .............. 3-1 3.1.1 No Action with Institutional Controls ..... 3-1 3.1.2 Containment .................. 3-2 3.1.3 Removal .................... 3-2 3.1.4 Treatment ................... 3-2 3.1.5 Disposal ................... 3-2 3.2 Remedial Technology Screening ............ 3-2 3.3 Identification and Screening of Groundwater Remedial Technologies ................ 3-4 3.3.1 Minimal Action Technologies - Groundwater . 3-6 > 3.3.2 Containment Technologies - Groundwater . 3-7 t? 3.3.3 Removal Technologies - Groundwater ..... 3-8 3.3.4 Treatment Technologies - Groundwater .... 3-9 § 3.3.5 Disposal/Discharge Technologies - Groundwater 3-19 •- 3 VO *> u> AOP-35-H j TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page No. 3.4 Identification and Screening of Soil Remedial Technologies ................ 3-23 3.4.1 Minimal Action Technologies - Soil ..... 3-24 3.4.2 Containment Technologies - Soil ....... 3-27 3.4.3 Removal Technologies - Soil ......... 3-29 3.4.4 Treatment Technologies - Soil ........ 3-30 3.4.5 Disposal Technologies - Soil ........ 3-38 3.5 Summary of Remedial Technology Screening ...... 3-40 4.0 DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES .... 4-1 4.1 Alternative Development and Evaluation Criteria ... 4-1 4.1.1 Alternative Development Criteria ...... 4-2 4.1.2 Alternative Evaluation Criteria ....... 4-2 4.2 Source Control (Soil) Remedial Alternatives ..... 4-3 4.2.1 SC-1: No Action .............. 4-5 4.2.2 SC-2: Capping ............... 4-6 4.2.3 SC-3: Soil Flushing ............ 4-9 4.2.4 SC-4: Soil Vapor Extraction ........ 4-17 4.2.5 SC-5: Soil Vapor Extraction and Soil Flushing ............... 4-21 4.2.6 SC-6: Excavation and Low Temperature Thermal Desorptlon .......... 4-23 4.2.7 SC-7: Excavation and Off site Landfill . 4-28 4.2.8 Summary of Source Control Alternative Screening ............ 4-29 4.3 Management of Migration (Groundwater) Remedial Alternatives ................ 4-29 4.3.1 MM-1: No Action with Institutional Controls ............... 4-31 4.3.2 MM-2: Extraction and Treatment: Biological /Air Stripping/ Carbon Adsorption .......... 4-32 4.3.3 MM-3: Extraction and Treatment: Steam Stripping/Carbon Adsorption ..... 4-41 4.3.4 NM-4: Extraction and Treatment: PACT . 4-45 4.3.5 MM- 5: Extraction and Treatment: UV Oxidation ............. 4-47 4.3.6 Summary of Management of Migration Alternative Screening ............ 4-50 4.4 Extraction System Alternatives ........... 4-50 4.4.1 Option A .................. 4-51 4.4.2 Option B .................. 4-54 4.4.3 Natural Attenuation ............. 4-54 4.4.4 Natural Soil Flushing ............ 4-56 o o o 10 AOP-35-H 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Pace No. 5.0 DETAILED EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Overview of Evaluation Criteria ........... 5-1 5.1.1 Threshold Criteria .............. 5-1 5.1.2 Primary Balancing Criteria .......... 5-2 5.1.3 Modifying Criteria .............. 5-2 5.2 Description of Evaluation Criteria ......... 5-2 5.2.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and Environment ............... 5-2 5.2.2 Compliance with ARARs ............ 5-2 5.2.3 Short Term Effectiveness .......... 5-3 5.2.4 Long Term Effectiveness ........... 5-4 5.2.5 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility or Volume . 5-4 5.2.6 Implementability .............. 5-5 5.2.7 Cost .................... 5-5 5.2.8 State Acceptance ......."....... 5-8 5.2.9 Community Acceptance ............ 5-8 5.3 Detailed Evaluation of Source Control Alternatives . 5-8 5.3.1 SC-1: No Action .............. 5-8 5.3.2 SC-2: Capping ............... 5-10 5.3.3 SC-3: Soil Flushing ............ 5-13 5.3.4 SC-4: Soil Vapor Extraction ........ 5-17 5.3.5 SC-5: Soil Vapor Extraction and Soil Flushing ............ 5-21 5.3.6 SC-6: Excavation and Low Temperature .... Thermal Desorption .......... 5-25 5.3.7 Summary of Source Control Alternative Costs . 5-32 5.4 Detailed Evaluation of Management of Migration Alternatives ............... 5-32 5.4.1 MM-1: No Action .............. 5-32 5.4.2 MM-2: Extraction Treat - Biological/ A1r Stripping/Carbon Adsorption . 5-36 5.4.3 MM-4: Extract and Treat - Powdered Activated Carbon Treatment (PACT) . 5-40 5.4.4 MM-5: Extract and Treat - UV Oxidation . 5-47 5.4.5 Summary of Management of Migration Alternative Costs .............. 5-54 5.5 Comparison Among Alternatives ............ 5-54 5.5.1 Source Control Alternatives ......... 5-54 5.5.2 Management of Migration Alternatives .... 5-62 5.6 Site Remediation Alternatives ............ 5-63 o TJ O O o •£> (J\ AOP-35-H 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) LIST OF TABLES Tables Page No. 1-1 Above-Ground Storage Tank Information 1-6 1-2 Organic Chemical Sunmary for Surface and Subsurface Soil Samples 1-16 1-3 Summary of Inorganic Substances In Groundwater Samples 1-18 1-4 Organic Chemical Summary for Monitoring Well Samples 1-20 1-5 Summary of Chemicals of Potential Concern 1-25 2-1 Base Line Risks for Exposure Pathways 2-2 2-2 Potential Chemical - Specific ARARs 2-6 2-3 Organic Chemical Summary and ARARs for Groundwater 2-8 2-4 Potential Location - Specific ARARs . 2-9 2-5 Potential Action - Specific ARARs 2-12 2-6 Soil Remediation Goals 2-19 3-1 Identification of Potential Groundwater Remediation Technologies 3-5 3-2 Identification of Potential Soil Remediation Technologies 3-25 4-1 Chemical Properties of Selected Soil Contaminants 4-15 4-2 Chemical Properties of Selected Groundwater Contaminants 4-39 5-1 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-1 5-11 5-2 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-2 5-14 5-3 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-3 5-18 5-4 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-4 5-22 5-5 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-5 5-26 5-6 Cost Estimate Summary - SC-6 5-30 5-7 Cost Estimate Summary - Source Control Alternatives 5-33 5-8 Cost Estimate Summary - MM-1 5-37 5-9 Cost Estimate Summary - MM-2 5-41 5-10 Cost EstlMte Summary - MM-4 5-48 5-11 Cost EstlMte Summary - MM- 5 5-55 5-12 Cost EstlMte Summary - Management of Migration Alternative 5-59 5-13 Present North Cost Summary - 5X Discount 5-65 5-14 Present Worth Cost Summary - 10X Discount 5-66 o o AOP-35-H 1V TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) LIST OF FIGURES Figures Page No. 1-1 Site Location 1-3 1-2 Study Area 1-4 1-3 Site Layout 1-5 1-4 Geologic Cross-Sections 1-9 1-5 Shallow Piezometric Contour Hap 1-12 1-6 TCE Isoconcentration Contour Hap 1-14 1-7 1-17 3-1 Groundwater Technology Screening 3-41 3-2 Soil Technology Screening 3-42 4-1 Contaminated Soil Area and Volume Estimates 4-4 4-2 SC-2: Capping Alternative 4-7 4-3 Asphalt Cap Cross-Section 4-8 4-4 SC-3: Soil Flushing 4-11 4-5 Proposed Leach Field 4-12 4-6 SC-3: Soil Flushing 4-13 4-7 SC-4: Soil Vapor Extraction 4-18 4-8 Soil Vapor Extraction Process Diagram 4-19 4-9 Low Temperature Thermal Desorption Process 4-24 4-10 SC-6: Excavation and Thermal Treatment 4-26 4-11 MM-2: Biological/Air/Carbon 4-33 4-12 Biological Treatment 4-35 4-13 Air Stripping 4-36 4-14 Carbon Adsorption 4-37 4-15 HM-3: Steam Stripping/Carbon 4-42 4-16 HH-4: PACT 4-46 4-17 HH-5: UV Oxidation Treatment 4-48 4-18 Groundwater Extraction System Capture Zones 4-52 4-19 Groundwater Extraction System Option A - (4 Pumping Wells) - 72 GPH 4-53 4-20 Groundwater Extraction System Option B - (7 Pumping Wells) - 126 GPH 4-55 APPENDICES A State of New Jersey Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements B Comparison of the Performance of RCRA and Lined- Asphalt Caps > 13 C Recharge Basin Hounding and Estimated Soil Flushing Times o=> D Groundwater Hodeling o E Alternative Cost Calculations £ AOP-35-H Section 1 AOP 001 0948 A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Albino Ambushed by Crazed Faker
    . Public Lit.-iry, Vtlley Broak Ave.. Lyr.ihurst, I!. 3. LEADERETTE h >"* » knock «, «„ door ot * »«*« TJ Bru^h-Man front. Helookrd strpervismg princjtal ol KhooU. H* had heard w"",!.'1 WM " Scho°1 »rhen Jhe ^ to ^j,.^,,^ v we Mld n .hK saie?man-i'«< » long-sutJwmi school ,u- \ VoL XXVIII—No. 7 •"TS'.'Jatutkamr*i . I LYMMUfcO^V i. MtX ST ?• i'Ht Albino Ambushed By Crazed Faker Big Crowds •*%£?** Italian Cook 00 Turning Out ar Local Policeman For Softball irtsaffftss: • drive reaterdar to raiae a Victim Of Fake Reliefer Company Moved > M >M M >of?ball G*m«t '"* •• *'>M ?:.* -J •aa aak aai aam ^"fc . cbaataw^l* I sW Oan d realdeat~ a apa ** Mltrlied. Aa; aa* trhklat la £. To IU 200,00S««n B0y Over contribute ran *• aa ay calling Township Mourns Popular . - a.*. I. l»r Patrolman Hit-hard Ta.Mai To Plant Here Lyndhur*, Municipal Softball | ^ ^^ tn|w|rtm Policeman Whose Rites League, durinc »ts 155 scheduled I Modern New rr games, i* expected to pUy before Will Be Held Saturday a tooooo mur Kttrna«.nf», ft * wiir stated at Monday night's R,»a; i, \ Reject Bid** | IIIIKUV VII-i Building Is of Commissioners meeting. U-1, ,.( Prinlmii ll...n.,. I Replying to suggestion* from' I*' U* in ,1 t%tl..l Jess*? Thorne, president of thr! For Memorial t- Completed Taxpayers League, that admission • fhould be charged in order tn r<* | am :' • On July 28, the Italian Cook Ueve taxpayers, he was told by i • ,.l|l lt( .1 (f I. M.I III I »||I I.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry and Stratigraphic Relations of Middle Proterozoic Rocks of the New Jersey Highlands
    FOLD Volkert and Drake— MIDDLE PROTEROZOIC ROCKS OF THE NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS—U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1565–C Volkert U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochemistry and Stratigraphic Relations of Middle Proterozoic Rocks of the New Jersey Highlands U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1565–C Prepared in cooperation with the New Jersey Geological Survey Printed on recycled paper Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications by calling Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the the toll-free telephone number 1–888–ASK–USGS or contact- Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from— ing the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, Superintendent of Documents along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur- Government Printing Office rent-year issues of the catalog “New Publications of the U.S. Washington, DC 20402 Geological Survey.” Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from— Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com- Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus- Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and thematic maps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landslide in Glacial Soils of New Jersey
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (2004) - Fifth International Conference on Case Geotechnical Engineering Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 17 Apr 2004, 10:30am - 12:30pm A Landslide in Glacial Soils of New Jersey James Talerico New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey John R. Schuring New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey Raj P. Khera New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Talerico, James; Schuring, John R.; and Khera, Raj P., "A Landslide in Glacial Soils of New Jersey" (2004). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 12. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/5icchge/session03/12 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Landslide in Glacial soils of New Jersey Paper No. 3.19 James Talerico Dr. John R. Schuring Dr. Raj P. Khera New Jersey Institute of Technology New Jersey Institute of Technology New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, New Jersey-USA-07102 Newark, New Jersey-USA-07102 Newark, New Jersey-USA-07102 ABSTRACT On August 13, 2000, a massive landslide occurred in Northern New Jersey following an extreme rainfall event during which at least 381mm (15 in) of precipitation fell during a 4-day period.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHAIC PERIOD in NEW JERSEY (Ca. 8000 BC
    THE ARCHAIC PERIOD IN NEW JERSEY (ca. 8000 B.C. - 1000 B.C.) by Herbert C. Kraft and R. Alan Mounier Introduction This chapter deals with the Archaic Stage or Period (ca. 8000 B.C.-1000 B.C.) in New Jersey. Among the elements reviewed in this section are: 1) the nature and distribution of Archaic sites; 2) the culture, history, and chronology of the Archaic Period as perceived in New Jersey; 3) the kinds and quality of past archeo­ logical research concerning the Archaic Period in this region; 4) the biases and limitat ions of pas t research; and 5) the kinds of research and information required for the intelligent and respon­ .sible management of Archaic and other archeological resources in New Jersey. The Archaic Period or Stage, as first defined by Ritchie (1932), denoted "an early level of culture based on hunting, fishing and gathering of wild vegetable foods, and lacking pottery, the smoking pipe, and agriculture" (Ritchie 1969: 31). Among archeolo­ gists, the term "Archaic" is now generally taken to mean a period of time and/or a stage of cultural development characterized by a hunting and gathering economy based upon the seasonal exploitation of natural resources by relatively small, mobile bands. Chronologically later than the Paleo-Indian Period or Stage, the Archaic represents a continuous cultural adaptation to new environments emerging in post-Pleistocene times. The more efficient Archaic adaptat ion is thought to have allowed (or to have spurred) population growth without the benefits of horticulture or the need of other wholesale environmental manipulations. The material remains associated with Archaic sites illustrate this adaptation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending for Assembly Very Low Turnout Expected to Vote
    which fawcam* a Suburban Publishing Corp. n#wtpop«r on July 2, 1964 An Official Nawspopar For Tha City * f Lindan 07036 PwMl«H*4 la«K Thwrodtty by Swbufbwt PvfctisHinf Corp. tuf»cripfi«n Rate 11.00 Yearly N.J.. THURSDAY, O C T Q K R 30, 1975- Second Ctest Poetooe Paid ot Linden, N J ending for Assembly Very low turnout expected to vote By STEVE McMANUS with i bribery indtetment banging over Um, An exceptionally quiet election campaign won the Democrirtfc primary in June without will conclude on Tuesday when Under voters party support. He and Thomas Deverin of go to the polls and express their preference for Carteret are favored to retain their Assembly two Assembly seats and five council positions. seat* in the 21at District of Unden, Winfield, There are also three freeholder berths on the Carteret and Elizabeth. line and several referenda, including the Republican challenger* for the legislative controversial Equal Rights Amendment for posts are Beatrice Bernzott, of Unden who lost women. to Gregorio for mayor by almost 4,00# vote* last i The League of Women Voters has issued its. year, and Manuel Fernandez, an Elizabeth stand on the bond issues; see separate story businessman below on this page Analysis of the referenda The only item to spark debate in the cam­ appears in today's commentary section, page paign was Bernzott’a repeated requests for four.) Gregorio to step down from his mayor’s job Polling places will be open from 7 a m. to 8 because of the indictment.
    [Show full text]
  • May 19, 2003 New Jersey Register
    THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE ADOPTION. THE OFFICIAL VERSION IS SCHEDULED TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE MAY 19, 2003 NEW JERSEY REGISTER. SHOULD THERE BE ANY DISCREPENCIES BETWEEN THIS TEXT AND THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF THE ADOPTION, THE OFFICIAL VERSION WILL GOVERN. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAND USE MANAGEMENT WATER MONITORING AND STANDARDS Surface Water Quality Standards N.J.A.C. 7:9B Adopted Amendments: N.J.A.C. 7:9B-1.15 Proposed: November 18, 2002 at 34 N.J.R. 3889(a) Adopted: April 22, 2003 by Bradley M. Campbell, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Protection Filed: April 28, 2003 with portions of the proposal not adopted at this time. Authority: N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., 58:11A-1 et seq., and 13:1D-1 et seq. DEP Docket Number: 28-02-10/347 Effective Date: May 19, 2003 Expiration Date: April 17, 2005 The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) is adopting amendments to the Surface Water Quality Standards proposed on November 18, 2002 at 34 N.J.R. 3889(a). The adopted amendments upgrade the antidegradation designations for fifteen waterbodies from Category 2 to Category 1. The comment period for this proposal closed on February 17, 2003. Public hearings regarding this proposal were held on December 10, 2002 at County Administration Building, New Brunswick, New Jersey and on December 18, 2002 at the Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey. Debra Hammond, Chief of the Bureau of Water Quality Standards and Assessment served as the hearing officer at both the hearings.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Boonton Township
    Township of Boonton Environmental Resource Inventory Prepared by Boonton Township Environmental Committee 2001 Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION Boonton Township is rich in natural and cultural resources. The Environmental Committee has assembled information on these resources in this document, Environmental Resource Inventory of Boonton Township (ERI), in order to provide a data base to help protect and preserve them through land use decisions. Wherever possible, the Committee has provided factual information. We look forward to the assistance of Township residents in our efforts to amend and supplement this report through additional research and field studies. The document is intended to be used as a reference tool by Township officials and by the public. In addition, copies will be distributed to area libraries and to schools. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Environmental Committee is grateful for the help of many of the Township citizens. We thank Daniel Salsberg and Matjorie Ford for their help in submitting information on wildlife and vegetation. We are especially thankful for the editing expertise of Max Schindler. illustrations in the Wildlife section are by J. Lee Gaitskill, and photography is by Diane Nelson, Lloyd Charlton, Max Schindler and Matt Novak. Boonton Township Environmental Committee Members: 2000 Barry Brantner, Chairman J. Lee Gaitskill Diane Nelson, Vice Chm. Jon Raser Onnolee Allieri Max Schindler Tom Donadio Ann Dixon, Liaison with Jeff Duncan Township Committee Frederick Ernst Publication has been made possible through financial assistance from the Boonton Township Committee and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Dedication 2 DEDICATION TO OSCAR KINCAID The Environmental Committee dedicates this report to the memory of Oscar Kincaid, former mayor and planning board chairman, who passed away on November 11, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • DPF Chester, LLC Brief
    Exhibit A Exhibit B Chester Borough Morris County Highlands Center Designation Feasibility Report Request for New Jersey Highlands Council Center Designation Approved by Chester Borough Land Use Board: September 26 2019 Implementation Plan / Schedule Revisions & Submitted to NJ Highlands Council Staff: October 3, 2019 Introduction This is Chester Borough’s Phase 1 Highlands Center Designation Investigation Report that identifies Chester Borough’s planning considerations in support the Borough’s request for Highlands Center designation from the Highlands Council. Chester Borough wishes to designate the municipality a Highlands Center and utilize the designation to support Center-based planning for development, redevelopment and infrastructure development that is appropriately scaled to address existing infrastructure needs and maintain Chester Borough’s small-town quality of life and historic character. The Borough of Chester is located in the southwest portion of Morris County surrounded by the Township of Chester. The Borough is 1.45 square miles and located at the cross- roads of State Route 206 and County Route 513. The Borough is a small residential community that is well-known throughout the region and the State for its picturesque historic character. Chester Borough’s Main Street Historic District is well known for its attractive historic buildings, specialty shops and commercial services. In addition, the Borough’s regional shopping centers along the US Route 206 state highway corridor serve the regional population and the traveling public that relies on this primary north/south access highway serving west Morris County. As of 2010, the Borough’s population was 1,649 people and included approximately 650 (647) housing units in Chester Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • OF WIRE SERVICES NEGRO H I WHITE M ARE
    VOI. XXV. CRANBURY, _iN. J., FRIDAY. NOVEMBER 19,- lftOJ) NO. Tho rebuke fell on heedless cam. Mary's next visit wus to. tho f 'o- graph office. Sho wrote three mes- NEGRO Hi WHITE H JERSEY STATE NEWS PRESIDENT TAFTJiOIVIE AGAW sages and tore thorn up. Tho final one said: "James Colonial), Nowton Find Crater of Old Volcano. Was Absent From Washington Vilhrge: Send word to mother I'll . OF WIRE SERVICES .University of Virginia Student Rescuers at Cherry, Illinois, Are M ARE LYNCHED Engineers on the Lackawanna bo homo for Thanksgiving aiid al- Railroad's twenty-clght-rallo cut-off More Than Three Months. Dies of Concussion of Brain. Forced Back. at Andover, which bas been under ways. " Western Union Bought by Phone Slayer of Annie Pelley Hanged wny for about a year, have discovered "Myra Wilson, indeed," she mur- lat Instead of making a cut through mured, na she made her way to the Syndicate. Voting Christian, Klglilwu Years of , „ „, . „ „ , and Shot at Cairo, III. >o Sparta Mountains, as had been Ho Mode a Trip of 13,000 "Miles A c\ » Hurrlllc.. to tho Oainc «t ! EiiKln«'t* Rowley, Warned 1'or Death Through the Went and South— superintendent's desk to hand In her K »f Thirteen, la Hurried A.way by ilaanod originally, they must tunnel resignation. "I guess I can glvo her Georgetown' Sheriff lo Avoid Lynching. part of the distance, at a cost esti- SOO fapcocliea Delivered. I IN CVCRYTHIINC GIVr THANKS, pointers on clerking." HUNDREDS OF WOMEN HELPED mated at $28,000 above the amount GOULDS SOLD STOCK AT $85 .
    [Show full text]
  • Rockaway Records
    ROCKAWAY RECORDS -OF- MO~~IS COUNTY, N. J., f /\MILIES. CE.1/E'l'BRY RNCOIWS, CHURCH HISTORY, Jll LI1'AR Y RECORDS, LOCAL HIS1'ORY, GENEALOGIES OF OLD FAJIILIES, NEARLY 20,000 DATA BY J. PERCY CRAYON ILLUSTRATED ROCKAWAY, N. J.: Roc,uwAY PuaLJ,umm Co. 1902 RCSl)¢Ctfullp i)¢dicattd TO THE MEMORY Of the best friend I ever knew, ro~ motber. She would have spoken her regrets, in words of kindnesR ?nd aff,ec'tion to any imperfections, 11ninten1 ional, in the work of her erring boy. THE AUTI-IOR. copy r igh L- LJ02 By J.Percy Crayon. THE ROCKAWAY CEMETERY RECORDS. In the interest of Jocnl hiRt,ory nucl offlce, much could have been nclde,1. gcuenlogy of the old Mo1Tis County The church nnd mouumentnl records families theRe records hnve been nr­ hnve only pnrtinlly filled this spnce. rnnged. lt is n grnve subject; the Rocknwny wns Rattled as early ns threads of romance were woven mnuy 1720, nncl became n pince of cou. yenrR ago by the houorecl nnmeR now re­ sidernble business in 1780 in the lmild­ 'l(tllecl to memory. ing of the Job Allen Iron Works. •.rra• In the nrrnugemeut the unmes nre clition relates thnt this p11rticular spot given with the dnte of birth and cleat.It, Imel been selected as n buri11l ground, alphabetically and also chrouologicnlly, God's acre, by the enrly families, but with parentage aud family connectiou t,heir nnmes lrnve not been recorded out.­ us for us kuown to the writer. side of t.110 Allen and Jackson families.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Highlands Coalition Trustee Jay F
    NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION 508 Main Street, Boonton, New Jersey 07005 973-588-7190 (office)/973-588-7193 (fax) www.njhighlandscoalition.org March 8, 2016 David M. Golden, Chief Bureau of Land Management, NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife NJ Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 420 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0420 Via email: [email protected] RE: Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area Forest Stewardship Plan Dear Mr. Golden, As you know, the New Jersey Highlands Coalition and many of its individual and organizational members have significant concerns regarding the proposed Forest Stewardship Plan (“the Plan”) for the Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (“SMWMA”). Please see our comments below: The SMWMA, 3,461 acres of public preserved land, lies within one of the most significant areas of mature, contiguous, and unfragmented forest in northern New Jersey. It is the core of the “Sparta Mountain Greenway” in Sussex and Morris counties, deemed in the 1990’s a “Critical Treasure” of the Highlands region by the Highlands Coalition and the Regional Plan Association, and a place that should remain undeveloped and be preserved for posterity. The Sparta Mountains, the westernmost ridge of the New Jersey Highlands, extends from the New York border southwest to beyond Interstate 80. From Hamburg Mountain WMA on the north, the range is now home to SMWMA, Mt. Paul State Park, Morris County’s Mahlon Dickerson Reservation, and Weldon Brook WMA, with Allamuchy State Park at its southern terminus. Adjacent to the east, public protected lands include Newark’s Pequannock Watershed, Rockaway River WMA, Wildcat Ridge WMA, Farny State Park, Split Rock Reservoir, Buck Mountain, and Pyramid Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Conservation
    CHAPTER 7: NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION Preservation of farmland is the cornerstone of the New Jersey Department of Agriculture’s (NJDA) Agricultural Smart Growth Plan and the Farmland Preservation Program. However, there is more to farmland preservation than merely the retirement of development rights or the outright purchase of farms. One of the cornerstones to a successful, long term Farmland Preservation Program is the conservation of natural resources on farms, without which the long term sustainability and viability of New Jersey’s preserved farmland would be in doubt. Natural Resource Protection Agencies There are numerous entities, both public and private, which administer, fund, and provide technical guidance for Sussex County farmers relative to natural resource conservation. These entities are in place to assist farmers with natural resource conservation issues, and should be called upon by farmers for appropriate assistance. Natural Resource Conservation Service An important partner in support of natural resource conservation for the agricultural community is the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The NRCS “provides assistance to private land owners (including farmers) in the conservation and management of their soil, water, and other natural resources. Local, state, and federal agencies and policymakers also rely on (its) expertise.” The NRCS provides technical assistance suited to the natural resource issues that are specific to a farmer’s needs, with ample opportunity for cost shares and financial incentives. (Information For Farmers)1 The local NRCS office serving Sussex, Warren, and Morris Counties is located at 101 Bilby Road, Suite 1H in Hackettstown, Warren County. Sussex County farmers may utilize this local NRCS office for assistance.
    [Show full text]