DOCSLIB.ORG

Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 20/09 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 20/09 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 10 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 20/09 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 10. - 23. November 2009 1. Friedensplan von Shaul Mofas a democratic system. […] The Mofaz plan, along with the pressure from the Der Friedensprozess zwischen Palästinensern und United States, can […] prod the prime minister to go Israelis ist festgefahren. Während es Premier- beyond the peace process' paralysis and submit an minister Netanjahu und Palästinenserpräsident initiative of his own as a solution to the Palestinian Abbas nicht gelingt, an einen Tisch zu kommen, conflict.” legte der ehemalige Verteidigungsminister Shaul HAA 11.11.09 Mofas von der stärksten Oppositionspartei Kadima nun einen eigenen Friedensfahrplan vor. Dieser The Israeli option should be first sieht die Gründung eines palästinensischen Staates “The Mofaz model comes with good intentions, but mit vorläufigen Grenzen vor, die von Israel zunächst based on past experience, it will likely yield bad unilateral bestimmt würden. Der Status von results. […] The main problem with Mofaz's plan is Jerusalem und ein Austausch von Land würde in that it puts forth the Palestinians' best alternative einer zweiten Phase verhandelt werden. Mofas ahead of Israel's. kritisierte die Regierung, die keinen Friedensplan Facilitated by security strategists and political habe und den Zeitdruck unter dem Israel stehe pundits, the gist of Mofaz's master plan is to enable verkenne. Er erklärte sich auch bereit, mit der a Palestinian state on borders that temporarily Hamas, die von Israel als Terrororganisation encompass approximately 60 percent of Judea and eingestuft wird, zu verhandeln, sofern sie „ihr Samaria, and to guarantee Israel's eventual Verhalten ändere“. withdrawal from 92% of the territories once conditions ripen. […] Mofaz is an Israeli war hero, With Mofaz as Beilin but his proposed plan for peace does not serve his “Shaul Mofaz […] comes along this week and country well. The plan's main problem is that it is proposes a plan for establishing a Palestinian state more of same in terms of giving the Palestinians gradually on ‘most of the territories’ captured in something in return for nothing. […] Israel should 1967. Mofaz, as a former defense minister and army start by getting land rather than always giving it chief of staff, is aware of the military and away.” demographic dangers facing Israel and sees a Ophir Falk, JPO 17.11.09 solution in the evacuation of the settlements and the setting up of an independent Palestinian state Mofaz’ left turn alongside Israel. He is a far cry from other politicians “Apparently he realized, just as Ariel Sharon realized in his willingness to talk with Hamas. in the 2003 campaign, that in order to win the Mofaz's proposal is not perfect. […] It's hard to find a premiership one needs to break to the Left. […] Palestinian counterpart who would, at the start of the One way or another, he is forcing the main players negotiations, recognize Israeli sovereignty over in the political arena to dust off their old campaign West Bank communities such as Ariel and Ma'aleh kits. […] Mofaz’s diplomatic plan elicited broad Adumim, as the Mofaz plan provides. The plan's public support according to a weekend poll. His details are less important, however, than the very problem is that the other politicians in the race may existence of the initiative, which poses a challenge adopt this plan, a move that would leave him without to Netanyahu and his government and stimulates a unique status to boast.” public debate. This is the opposition's classic role in Baruch Leshem, JED 16.11.09 1 Wettkampf der Torheit tinensischen Konflikt. Netanjahu habe Obama dazu “Das friedenspolitische Programm des Abge- aufgefordert, Abbas zurück an den Verhandlungs- ordneten Shaul Mofas hat den guten alten tisch zu bringen und versucht ihn davon zu über- Wettkampf, in dem Israelis der zwei Jahrtausende zeugen, dass er ein großes Interesse am Fortschritt alten Hoffnung nachjagen, im Lande Zion […] einen des Friedensprozesses habe. Das Weiße Haus ließ palästinensischen Staat zu gründen, auf einen lediglich verlauten, das Treffen sei „positiv“ ver- neuen grotesken Höhepunkt gebracht. […] laufen und habe sich um die bilateralen Be- Nun, da der Mann, der als ‚rechter Wegweiser‘ von ziehungen der beiden Länder gedreht. Kadima galt sich als ‚linker Wegweiser‘ neu erfunden hat, ist der Höhepunkt des politischen A relationship in crisis Opportunismus erreicht – und das sollte nicht nur „Relations between Israel and the United States are die Unterstützer von Mofas beunruhigen, sondern all in crisis. This is the conclusion that stems from the jene, die sich Sorgen um das Ansehen des difficulty in arranging a meeting between Prime politischen Apparats in Israel machen.“ Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Yoav Shorek, HZO 11.11.09 Barack Obama. The White House wanted Netanyahu to sweat The new converts before being granted an audience with the „Once every few months another right-wing politician president, and wanted everyone to see him perspire. sees the light. Suddenly he believes that time is […] In such circumstances, it is no longer important working against us, […] that the Palestinians what will be said at the meeting, and the extent to deserve a state and that the occupation must come which there will be an attempt to present it as an to an end. […] Former chief of staff and defense achievement. The prime minister of Israel was minister Shaul Mofaz […] has joined the converts' humiliated before all. […] Netanyahu may be an community. […] experienced diplomat and politician, and Obama On the face of it, this is good news. […] It appears may be a novice, but Obama is the president of a that those who seek peace and justice are in a clear superpower, and Netanyahu represents a small majority. […] But this of course is a delusion. As country that depends greatly on the United States. soon as the spotlights are turned off and the It sometimes appears that Netanyahu forgets this, columnists finish their praises, the converts resume and pretends he is the head of a superpower. […] their routine without lifting a finger to advance what Instead of making excuses and explaining the they preached. […] terrible situation, Netanyahu should make the effort Mofaz suggests talking to Hamas, but it doesn't to resolve the crisis with the American occur to him to try to do it here and now. […] And administration.” the public? It says yes to two states and votes for Aluf Benn, HAA 09.11.09 Likud and Avigdor Lieberman. In this great masque- rade, Israel has raised denial and pretense to an art. Washington chill The terrible price will be paid soon.” „As Netanyahu made his way to Washington, there Gideon Levy, HAA 12.11.09 were those bent on exacerbating tensions between our premier and President Barack Obama. […] 2. Netanjahu in Washington Much was made of the fact that even as he embarked on his journey Netanyahu still did not In den israelischen Medien wurden die Umstände have a firm appointment to see the president. […] von Premierminister Netanjahus Besuch in Wa- Comings and goings aside, the administration has shington überwiegend als Hinweis auf eine Krise been fundamentally misreading the situation here on zwischen den USA und Israel interpretiert. the ground, allowing its own initial poor judgment to Netanjahus Termin mit Präsident Obama war be reinforced by unrepresentative voices in Israel mehrmals verschoben worden und fand schließlich and on the margins of the American Jewish in den späten Abendstunden ohne offiziellen Foto- community. […] termin oder Pressekonferenz statt. Während des Most Israelis support a demilitarized Palestine living Treffens unterhielten sich die beiden Regierungs- side-by-side with the Jewish state of Israel - the very chefs mehr als eine Stunde lang unter zwei Augen. vision articulated by Netanyahu in his seminal June Israelischen Quellen zufolge ging es bei dem Ge- 14 Bar-Ilan address. spräch hauptsächlich um den israelisch-paläs- 2 Rather than giving Netanyahu a cold shoulder, Obama got carried away Obama should warmly embrace this viable blueprint “The latest move in respect to Gilo appears like a for peace.” tragic mistake that was not thought out at all and will JPO 08.11.09 merely serve to complicate the regional situation. We are talking about a move that is so illogical […] Saying goodbye to mom that even Opposition Leader Tzipi Livni […] realized “Netanjahu was received in Washington this week that she must openly speak out against this new with the honors reserved for an especially demand, which views Gilo as a settlement. embarrassing relative. The kind of relative you were Yet this is not only the demand that we stop building forced to meet – after all, he’s part of the family and in Gilo – a stipulation that nobody really intends to mom really asked you to do it – but you made sure adhere to – that makes us lose sleep, Mr. President. to meet him in a place nobody knows, so no one will It’s also the tone of your words. […] You explain that see you. […] However, it seems that something the construction would prompt the Palestinians to bigger is going on around here. […T]he Americans commit radical acts. You are hinting to us that are closer than ever to reaching the understanding terrorism is a direct and unavoidable result of that they would sleep well at night even without the Israel’s conduct. […] Mideastern food poisoning, and that they have There are especially illogical demands – and the better things to do in life than playing the role of one that views Gilo as a settlement is one of them – babysitter for us and the Palestinians.” that unite us Israelis from the Left and Right and Asaf Gefen, JED 14.11.09 remind us that at the end of the day we, and only we, are entitled to decide where we build, what we Are we with Obama, or what? build, and what will happen in our sovereign state.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Privatizing Religion: the Transformation of Israel's
    Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious- Zionist community BY Yair ETTINGER The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. This paper is part of a series on Imagining Israel’s Future, made possible by support from the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of its author and do not represent the views of the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund, their officers, or employees. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu Table of Contents 1 The Author 2 Acknowlegements 3 Introduction 4 The Religious Zionist tribe 5 Bennett, the Jewish Home, and religious privatization 7 New disputes 10 Implications 12 Conclusion: The Bennett era 14 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious-Zionist community The Author air Ettinger has served as a journalist with Haaretz since 1997. His work primarily fo- cuses on the internal dynamics and process- Yes within Haredi communities. Previously, he cov- ered issues relating to Palestinian citizens of Israel and was a foreign affairs correspondent in Paris. Et- tinger studied Middle Eastern affairs at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and is currently writing a book on Jewish Modern Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Command and Control | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Command and Control by David Makovsky, Olivia Holt-Ivry May 23, 2012 ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Olivia Holt-Ivry Articles & Testimony his week, the world's major powers resumed negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program. Should they fail, T the specter of a possible Israeli strike looms large, seeming to grow more likely as Tehran's nuclear program advances. In recent weeks, however, the conventional wisdom has shifted to favor the view that Israel is not on the cusp of a strike against Iran. This has been driven in part by public comments from former Israeli security officials -- notably former Mossad head Meir Dagan and former Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin -- questioning the wisdom of such an attack. An Israeli strike is not feasible, the thinking goes, so long as its security community remains divided -- and the thinly veiled threats of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are therefore mere bluster. Don't be so sure. Dagan and Diskin's views aren't likely to tell us much about the likelihood of a strike on Iran one way or the other. For starters, they're former officials -- given the sensitivity of this issue, and the recent media misinterpretation of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Benny Gantz's remarks earlier this month, no other current members of the security establishment are likely to go public with their views.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009
    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs LEBANON SYRIA West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009 West Bank Gaza Strip JORDAN Barta'a ISRAEL ¥ EGYPT Area Affected r The Barrier’s total length is 709 km, more than e v i twice the length of the 1949 Armistice Line R n (Green Line) between the West Bank and Israel. W e s t B a n k a d r o The total area located between the Barrier J and the Green Line is 9.5 % of the West Bank, Qalqilya including East Jerusalem and No Man's Land. Qedumim Finger When completed, approximately 15% of the Barrier will be constructed on the Green Line or in Israel with 85 % inside the West Bank. Biddya Area Populations Affected Ari’el Finger If the Barrier is completed based on the current route: Az Zawiya Approximately 35,000 Palestinians holding Enclave West Bank ID cards in 34 communities will be located between the Barrier and the Green Line. The majority of Palestinians with East Kafr Aqab Jerusalem ID cards will reside between the Barrier and the Green Line. However, Bir Nabala Enclave Biddu Palestinian communities inside the current Area Shu'fat Camp municipal boundary, Kafr Aqab and Shu'fat No Man's Land Camp, are separated from East Jerusalem by the Barrier. Ma’ale Green Line Adumim Settlement Jerusalem Bloc Approximately 125,000 Palestinians will be surrounded by the Barrier on three sides. These comprise 28 communities; the Biddya and Biddu areas, and the city of Qalqilya. ISRAEL Approximately 26,000 Palestinians in 8 Gush a communities in the Az Zawiya and Bir Nabala Etzion e Enclaves will be surrounded on four sides Settlement S Bloc by the Barrier, with a tunnel or road d connection to the rest of the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Politics and Diplomacy
    Hoover Press : Zelnick/Israel hzeliu ch7 Mp_119 rev1 page 119 7. Politics and Diplomacy as israeli forces were clearing recalcitrant settlers from their Gaza homes on August 16, 2005, Khalil Shikaki, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in Ra- mallah, published a column in the Jerusalem Post headlined, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win.”1 Shikaki, a pollster and political analyst respected in Israel and the west, questioned the wisdom of Israeli unilateralism in Gaza and on the West Bank as opposed to Lebanon, where no one on the other side wanted to talk. Here, he argued, Hamas may be as close-minded as Hez- bollah, preferring to paint Israel’s withdrawal as a victory for Pal- estinian resistance, but Abu Mazen, supported by Palestinian pub- lic opinion, wanted to reduce tensions and negotiate. Make him look good by easing restrictions on Palestinian trade and move- ment, and he will help Sharon and Israel by defeating Hamas and talking about the terms for settling the conflict. In other words, let the PA rather than Hamas control the Palestinian narrative of withdrawal. Shakaki updated his survey data two months later for a con- ference at Brandeis University hosted by Shai Feldman, director of the Crown Center for Middle East Studies and former director of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv. By that October conference, 84 percent of Palestinians were convinced that violence had played a role in the Israeli withdrawal. Irre- 1. Khalil Shikaki, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win,” Jerusalem Post, August 16, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Yad Vashem Archives Rediscover Heroic Rescue - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    Yad Vashem archives rediscover heroic rescue - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper SUBSCRIBE TO HAARETZ DIGITAL EDITIONS TheMarker Car Rental עכבר העיר TheMarker הארץ Haaretz.com Café Week's End Hello susan Profile Log out Mayim Bialik's big You have viewed 1 of 10 articles. subscribe now bang Sunday, December 02, 2012 Kislev 18, 5773 NEWS OPINION JEWISH WORLD BUSINESS TRAVEL IN CULTURE WEEKEND BLOGS ISRAEL ISRAEL NEWS Tzipi Livni's comeback Ehud Barak quits politics Iran Palestinian UN bid Egypt protests Like Follow 57k BREAKING NEWS 13:27 Seven Kadima MKs request to split and join Livni's Hatnuah (Haaretz) More Breaking News Home Weekend Week's End Yad Vashem archives rediscover heroic rescue HAARETZ SELECT At a moving ceremony this week in Berlin, Yad Vashem recognized the previously unknown heroic rescue of Jews by an active Wehrmacht soldier during the Holocaust. By Ofer Aderet | Nov.30, 2012 | 12:35 PM 0 Tweet 4 Recommend Send You and 68 others recommend this.68 people ecommend this Be the fi st of o f iends On the religious right – unity and discord Habayit Hayehudi and National Union finally signed a unity agreement, and though it has been in the air for months, it wasn't a simple achievement. By Anshel Pfeffer| Israel Election Insider Israel bids adieu to Joe Lieberman, a staunch ally in U.S. Senate By Natasha Mozgovaya| News East Jerusalem project could bury two- state solution By Nir Hasson| Diplomacy & Defense | 28 Haredi parties realize they aren't immune to voters' disenchantment By Yair Ettinger| Features Gerhard Kurzbach at his 1940 wedding.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Thursday, May 19, 2016
    For Immediate Release Thursday, May 19, 2016 LIVE TELECAST OF "THE JERUSALEM POST CONFERENCE" ON JBS Sunday May 22, 2016 Beginning at 9AM One of the liveliest Jewish conferences of the year, The fifth annual "The Jerusalem Post Conference," will be televised LIVE this Sunday on JBS from the Marriott Marquis in Times Square, New York. In addition to its live and exclusive television coverage, JBS will also be producing the telecast for "The Jerusalem Post" which will be streaming it on line back to Israel. This not-to-be-missed annual event will include senior Israeli officials, newsmakers and opinion-shapers, who will discuss the key issues and challenges facing Israel and the Jewish world today. Join "The Jerusalem Post's" top journalists, leading politicians and experts to get a glimpse of the state of affairs in the Jewish state. A list of the speakers scheduled to appear is at the end of this release which includes a special video address by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Once again, the telecast will be anchored by JBS President, Mark S. Golub, who will be speaking with participants and those in attendance. "We're proud to partner again with 'The Jerusalem Post Conference'," commented JBS President, Mark S. Golub. "There always seems to be fireworks on stage as this is one Jewish conference where differences of opinion often erupt in passionate debate before our eyes." JBS will have encore presentations of highlights of the Conference. Please check the JBS Schedule for date and time. (www.jbstv.org) Here is the LIVE Program Schedule:: 9:00-9:30 Welcome by Steve Linde, outgoing Editor-in-Chief of The Jerusalem Post and Yaakov Katz, new Editor-in-Chief of The Jerusalem Post 9:30-9:50 Minister of Education and Diaspora Affairs Naftali Bennettis interviewed by Steve Linde 9:50-10:00 Opening speech by JPost conference president Ronald S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadima for Half Price? the Formation of a National Unity Government in Israel
    Israel Office_____________________________ Kadima for half price? The formation of a national unity government in Israel . The formation of a national unity government strengthens Prime Minister Netanyahu and gives him new leeway during negotiations. Kadima’s entry to the government strengthens moderate forces and weakens the hardliners. There will be no real change in policy. Kadima failed in opposition, and as a government party it will be even less able to push through a different policy. The agreement between Mofaz and Netanyahu was motivated in the main by domestic political reasons. This is the primary field in which moderate changes will take place rather than in foreign policy. There will be new Israeli offers of talks in the peace process, but no real progress should be expected, together with no surmounting of the present stalemate. It is not clear whether Mofaz will join the moderates or the hardliners in Netanyahu’s security cabinet over the Iran question. Dr. Ralf Hexel FES Israel, May 17, 2012 1 More political power for Netanyahu secure an influential ministerial position for himself? Or is he seeking a change in policy? In a surprise move on May 8, 2012, the opposi- tion Kadima party (28 seats), led by former No early elections - a national unity gov- army head and defense minister Shaul Mofaz, ernment instead joined prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right leaning-religious government coalition (66 When the Knesset convened on the morning of out of 120 seats). Netanyahu now has a gov- May 7, parliamentarians and public were abso- ernment comprising seven parties; this has a lutely sure that the votes needed to hold early parliamentary majority of 94 and can rightly be elections on September 4, 2012 and to dissolve called a national unity government.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Memo
    Research memo From Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu: The Evolution of Israel’s National Security Strategy By Jacob Nagel and Jonathan Schanzer May 13, 2019 Every White House has an offi cial National Security Strategy (NSS) thanks to the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986.1 Th e law mandates annual revisions to the NSS, but the accepted practice is for the White House to publish a new strategy every four years. Th e public nature of the strategy ensures that the document is full of latitudes.p Nonetheless, the requirement to produce the NSS ensures that each president’s national security team conducts a thorough review of U.S. foreign and defense policy. Th e resulting document represents, at least in principle, the authoritative view of the commander in chief. Israel, despite being a country that is under constant threat and thus in constant need of updated national security strategies, has offi cially released only one such document. David Ben-Gurion, the country’s fi rstrime p minister, wrote Israel’s fi rst and only offi cially approved national security document. It was the product of approximately seven weeks of work in 1953, when he took a leave of absence to write it in his small home in the southern desert kibbutz of Sde Boker. Since then, Israel has not published an offi cial, updated security concept. Th ere were at least eethr serious attempts, which this report details. None, however, were successful in becoming offi cial Israeli government documents. Israel is now on the cusp of producing a new national security strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Post-American Middle East Why the Status Quo Is Sustainable
    Israel and the Post-American Middle East Why the Status Quo Is Sustainable By Martin Kramer Foreign Affairs July - August 2016 Was the feud between U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, first over settlements and then over Iran, a watershed? Netanyahu, it is claimed, turned U.S. support of Israel into a partisan issue. Liberals, including many American Jews, are said to be fed up with Israel’s “occupation,” which will mark its 50th anniversary next year. The weakening of Israel’s democratic ethos is supposedly undercutting the “shared values” argument for the relationship. Some say Israel’s dogged adherence to an “unsustainable” status quo in the West Bank has made it a liability in a region in the throes of change. Israel, it is claimed, is slipping into pariah status, imposed by the global movement for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS). Biblical-style lamentations over Israel’s final corruption have been a staple of the state’s critics and die-hard anti-Zionists for 70 years. Never have they been so detached from reality. Of course, Israel has changed—decidedly for the better. By every measure, Israel is more globalized, prosperous, and democratic than at any time in its history. As nearby parts of the Middle East slip under waves of ruthless sectarian strife, Israel’s minorities rest secure. As Europe staggers under the weight of unwanted Muslim migrants, Israel welcomes thousands of Jewish immigrants from Europe. As other Mediterranean countries struggle with debt and unemployment, Israel boasts a growing economy, supported by waves of foreign investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peace Volume 24 Number 1 January-February 2014 KERRY SEARCHES FOR A FRAMEWORK FOR CONTINUING TALKS U.S. efforts to end the conflict be- Allen has offered ideas and Kerry has tween Israelis and Palestinians are now “Any notion that Secretary been discussing this issue with Netan- focused on the presentation by Secretary Kerry failed to obtain the yahu and Abbas. of State John Kerry of a U.S.-drafted President’s backing for his ef- Land for Peace “framework for negotiations.” This will forts is totally false. President be an American document, but Kerry For almost five decades, U.S. policy- Obama remains fully invested has said both sides may offer reserva- makers and diplomats have attempted tions. in Secretary Kerry’s tireless to create the foundations for peaceful Kerry told Washington Post columnist work on behalf of peace, and relations between Israel and its Arab David Ignatius on February 7 that a those efforts are not focused enemies. When these efforts succeeded, framework is the only way to “be able on confronting the parties— Israel evacuated its settlers and armed to keep the negotiations moving.” PLO they are aimed at bridging forces behind secure and recognized president Mahmoud Abbas has threat- differences and developing a borders, increasing the security of all ened to initiate action in the UN if the framework for negotiation on parties. That remains the challenge of current bilateral talks, which Kerry an- the core issues.” the current U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Appropriate Model for Female Service in the IDF?
    What is the Appropriate Model for Female Service in the IDF? Pnina Sharvit Baruch In Israel’s 2013 election campaign a great deal of attention was paid to the subject of ultra-Orthodox conscription into the IDF. However, although this subject has direct implications for the service of women in the IDF, due to the demands for separation in the course of military service between ultra- Orthodox soldiers and women, the issue of service of women in the IDF was hardly the subject of public discussion. Moreover, when a ministerial committee headed by Minister Yaakov Peri1 was established to examine the issue of ultra-Orthodox conscription, a female minister was appointed to the commission only in response to the protest of women’s organizations.2 As a result, Minister Limor Livnat was appointed as a member of the committee, and at her initiative and urging, the issue was discussed by the committee, ZLWKWKHSDUWLFLSDWLRQRI%ULJDGLHU*HQHUDO UHV *LOD.DOL¿$PLUIRUPHU :RPHQ¶V$IIDLUV$GYLVRUWRWKH&KLHIRIWKH*HQHUDO6WDIIDQGP\VHOI3 As a result of the discussion, the committee’s conclusions included a clause stipulating that the conscription of ultra-Orthodox men be conducted in a manner that does not impact detrimentally on the status of women in the IDF, and a provision to this effect was introduced in the draft bill on the subject deliberated by the parliamentary committee chaired by then-MK Ayelet Shaked.47KLVFODXVHZDVDOVRLQFOXGHGLQWKH¿QDOZRUGLQJRIWKH /DZLQ6HFWLRQZKLFKVWLSXODWHV³7KHVWDWXVDQGLQWHJUDWLRQRIIHPDOH military entrants in the security services will not be infringed upon due to the security service of yeshiva graduates and the graduates of ultra-Orthodox educational institutions under this Chapter.”5 Another directive pertaining to the service of women that was included in the bill is the proposal to extend the service of women by four months, to 28 months, in parallel to 78 I Pnina Sharvit Baruch the reduction of service for men from 36 to 32 months.
    [Show full text]