DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D: CAFE PRIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D: CAFE PRIA APPENDIX D NHTSA Preliminary Regulatory Impact Assessment U.S. Department Of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis Corporate Average Fuel Economy for MY 2012-MY 2016 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation National Center for Statistics and Analysis August 2009 D-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 14 II. NEED OF THE NATION TO CONSERVE ENERGY....................................................... 17 III. BASELINE AND ALTERNATIVES................................................................................. 20 IV. IMPACT OF OTHER FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE STANDARDS ON FUEL ECONOMY .................................................................................................................................. 48 V. FUEL ECONOMY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES AND THE VOLPE MODEL........ 61 VI. MANUFACTURER CAFE CAPABILITIES................................................................... 271 VII. COST IMPACTS............................................................................................................ 296 VIII. BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED FUEL ECONOMY ................................................... 343 IX. IMPACT OF WEIGHT REDUCTION ON SAFETY...................................................... 414 X. NET BENEFITS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSES ........................................................ 441 XI. FLEXIBILITIES IN MEETING THE STANDARD........................................................ 460 XII. PROBABILISTIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS......................................................... 463 XIII. REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT AND UNFUNDED MANDATES REFORM ACT ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................. 496 D-2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This assessment examines the costs and benefits of improving the fuel economy of passenger cars and light trucks for model years (MY) 2012 through MY 2016. It includes a discussion of the technologies that can improve fuel economy, analysis of the potential impact on retail prices, safety, lifetime fuel savings and their value to consumers, and other societal benefits such as improved energy security and reduced emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases.1 In a previous rulemaking, the agency reformed the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards with a size-based standard based on footprint.2 This rulemaking continues this approach; a continuous mathematical function provides a separate fuel economy target for each footprint. Different parameters for the continuous mathematical function are derived. Individual manufacturers will be required to comply with a single fuel economy level that is based on the distribution of its production among the footprints of its vehicles. Although the same reformed CAFE scheme is required for both passenger cars and light trucks, they are established with different continuous mathematical functions specific to the vehicles’ design capabilities. The baseline assumptions for this rulemaking differ from previous analyses. In the past, the baseline was the manufacturers’ confidential plans for each model year. In this analysis, the baseline is each manufacturer’s MY 2008 fleet. We assume that similar vehicles will be produced through MY 2016 and technologies are added to this baseline fleet to determine what mpg levels could be achieved with technologies. This approach is more transparent than relying on manufacturers’ confidential plans. NHTSA has examined a variety of alternatives. The eight scenarios examined include five alternatives that are annual percentage improvements over the baseline. The “Preferred Alternative” would require fuel economy levels that are between the 4 and 5 percent annual increase alternatives. The “Maximum Net Benefits” alternative is based upon availability of technologies and a marginal cost/benefit analysis. In this case the model continues to include technologies until marginal cost of adding the next technology exceeds the marginal benefit. “Total Costs Equal Total Benefits”: An increase in the standard to a point where essentially total costs of the technologies added together over the baseline added equals total benefits over the baseline. In this analysis, for brevity, at times it is labeled “TC = TB”. Table 1a shows the agency’s projection of the actual harmonic average that would be achieved by the manufacturers, assuming those manufacturers whose plans were above the requirements would achieve those higher levels. Table 1b shows the estimated required levels. All of the tables in this analysis compare an adjusted baseline to the projected achieved harmonic average. Costs: Costs were estimated based on the specific technologies that were applied to improve each manufacturer’s fuel economy up to the level required under each alternative. Table 2 provides those cost estimates on an average per-vehicle basis, and Table 3 provides those estimates on a fleet-wide basis in millions of dollars. 1 This analysis does not contain NHTSA’s assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the final rule for purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347. 2 Vehicle Footprint is defined as the wheelbase (the distance from the center of the front axle to the center of the rear axle) times the average track width (the distance between the centerline of the tires) of the vehicle (in square feet). D-3 2 Benefits: Benefits are determined mainly from fuel savings over the lifetime of the vehicle, but also include externalities such as reductions in criteria pollutants. The agency uses a 3 percent and 7 percent discount rate to value intra-generational future benefits and costs. Inter- generational3 benefits from future carbon dioxide reductions are always discounted at 3 percent, even when intra-generational benefits are discounted at 7 percent. Table 4 provides those estimates on an industry-wide basis at a 3 percent discount rate and Table 6 provides the estimates at a 7 percent discount rate. Net Benefits: Tables 5 and 7 compares societal costs and societal benefits of each alternative at the 3 percent and 7 percent discount rates, respectively. Fuel Savings: Table 8 shows the lifetime fuel savings in millions of gallons. 3 Inter-generational benefits, which include reductions in the expected future economic damages caused by increased global temperatures, a rise in sea levels, and other projected impacts of climate change, are anticipated to extend over a period from approximately fifty to two hundred or more years in the future, and will thus be experienced primarily by generations that are not now living. D-4 3 Table 1a Alternative CAFE Levels Projected Achieved Harmonic Average for the Fleet, in mpg Alternative MY 2012 MY 2013 MY 2014 MY 2015 MY 2016 Passenger Cars Preferred Alternative 32.9 34.2 35.2 36.5 37.6 3% Annual Increase 32.2 33.3 34.0 34.7 35.5 4% Annual Increase 32.4 33.7 34.8 36.0 37.1 5% Annual Increase 32.6 34.4 35.9 37.2 38.7 6% Annual Increase 32.7 34.9 36.9 38.4 40.1 7% Annual Increase 32.9 35.3 37.5 39.0 41.0 Max Net Benefits 33.0 35.4 37.3 38.7 40.0 Total Cost = Total Benefit 33.2 35.6 37.8 39.2 40.9 Light Trucks Preferred Alternative 24.9 25.7 26.5 27.4 28.1 3% Annual Increase 24.3 24.8 25.4 26.0 26.5 4% Annual Increase 24.5 25.2 26.3 27.1 27.7 5% Annual Increase 24.6 25.7 27.0 28.2 29.0 6% Annual Increase 24.8 26.0 27.6 29.2 30.3 7% Annual Increase 25.0 26.4 28.2 29.9 31.0 Max Net Benefits 25.4 27.1 28.5 29.7 30.3 Total Cost = Total Benefit 25.5 27.2 28.8 30.1 30.8 Passenger Cars & Light Trucks Preferred Alternative 29.3 30.5 31.5 32.7 33.7 3% Annual Increase 28.7 29.6 30.3 31.1 31.9 4% Annual Increase 28.9 30.0 31.2 32.4 33.3 5% Annual Increase 29.1 30.6 32.1 33.5 34.8 6% Annual Increase 29.2 31.0 33.0 34.6 36.2 7% Annual Increase 29.4 31.4 33.5 35.3 37.0 Max Net Benefits 29.7 31.8 33.6 35.0 36.1 Total Cost = Total Benefit 29.8 32.0 34.0 35.5 36.9 Preferred Alternative CAFE Levels Projected Achieved Harmonic Average for the Fleet, in gallons per 100 miles MY MY MY MY MY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 PC 3.0438 2.9267 2.8398 2.7434 2.6623 LT 4.0241 3.8952 3.7713 3.6495 3.5604 D-5 4 Table 1b Alternative CAFE Levels Estimated Required Average for the Fleet, in mpg Alternative MY 2012 MY 2013 MY 2014 MY 2015 MY 2016 Passenger Cars Preferred Alternative 33.6 34.4 35.2 36.4 38.0 3% Annual Increase 31.5 32.9 33.8 34.7 35.6 4% Annual Increase 32.1 33.6 34.8 36.1 37.4 5% Annual Increase 32.7 34.2 35.8 37.5 39.3 6% Annual Increase 33.0 34.9 36.9 38.9 41.1 7% Annual Increase 33.3 35.5 37.9 40.4 43.1 Max Net Benefits 33.4 36.0 38.1 39.5 40.9 Total Cost = Total Benefit 33.8 36.7 39.0 40.8 42.7 Light Trucks Preferred Alternative 25.0 25.6 26.2 27.1 28.3 3% Annual Increase 24.3 24.5 25.2 25.9 26.6 4% Annual Increase 24.3 25.0 26.0 26.9 27.9 5% Annual Increase 24.4 25.5 26.7 28.0 29.3 6% Annual Increase 24.6 26.0 27.5 29.0 30.7 7% Annual Increase 24.8 26.5 28.3 30.1 32.2 Max Net Benefits 26.4 27.7 28.8 30.1 30.6 Total Cost = Total Benefit 26.7 28.0 29.2 30.9 31.5 Passenger Cars & Light Trucks Preferred Alternative 29.8 30.6 31.4 32.6 34.1 3% Annual Increase 28.4 29.3 30.2 31.1 32.0 4% Annual Increase 28.7 29.9 31.0 32.3 33.6 5% Annual Increase 29.0 30.4 31.9 33.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles in Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall in Ford’S History
    NYS Department of State safetyOFPC ALERT October NY STATE FIRE 2009 Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles In Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall In Ford’s History Ford Motor Co. says it will add 4.5 million older-model vehicles to the list of those recalled because a defective cruise control switch could cause a fire. Ford says 1.1 million Ford Windstar minivans will be recalled for repairs due to a small risk of fires. The company says another 3.4 million Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles with the same switches also will be recalled even though there have been no reports of fires. Those vehicles mainly are trucks and SUVs. All vehicles covered by the recall are from the 1992 to 2003 model years. This is Ford’s seventh recall due to the Texas Instruments speed control switches. The recalls cover a total of 14.3 million vehicles and combined are the largest in Ford’s history Summary of the Ford Fire Recalls Both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Ford Motor Co. have issued several recalls of millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles as a result of a defective cruise control switch that can lead to a spontaneous fire, even when the vehicle is turned off, parked and unattended. The most recent of this Ford cruise control recalls occurred on September 9, 2008, when the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration re-recalled millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury SUV’s pickup trucks, vans and cars. This advisory was the second recall warning from the safety agency issued in 2008 and is meant to bring in nearly 5 million cars, trucks and SUVs which still have not been brought in for repair since an earlier recall of 12 million vehicles in February 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
    U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 808 570 January 1997 NHTSA Technical Report Relationships between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Go ,i on No. 3, Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 808 570 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Dote January 1997 Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk 6. Performing Organization Code in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 8. Performing Organization Report No 7. Author's) Charles J. Kahane, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Wort Unit No. (TRAIS) Evaluation Division, Plans and Policy National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Conrroct or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Cohered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary. Notes NHTSA Reports DOT HS 808 569 through DOT HS 808 575 address vehicle size and safety. 16. Abstract Fatality rates per million exposure years are computed by make, model and model year, based on the crash experience of model year 1985-93 passenger cars and light trucks (pickups, vans and sport utility vehicles) in the United States during calendar years 1989-93.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheel Cylinder the Best in Brakes Made Easy
    BPI-WCAG19B -L-, /z_ 1 2 c�Z Z l /l {2 t1 le() � J ® The I in brakes APPLICATION GUIDE Wheel Cylinder The Best in Brakes Made Easy. Raybestos® has been a giant in the automotive aftermarket industry for over a century. As an industry leader, Raybestos® is committed to manufacturing high-quality brake parts that offer unparalleled performance and safety. From friction to rotors, calipers to hydraulics, Raybestos® produces dependable brake parts with expansive coverage. All of our products are extensively tested so you can be sure you are buying a product that is reliable and safe. Raybestos delivers brake parts you can count on. Raybestos® had our customers in mind when we decided to realign our product offering into three distinct lines. When you think of Raybestos®, you think of The Best in Brakes®. That is what our R-Line delivers. It is a reliable family of products focused on every day driving. Our Element3™ line is The Best in Brakes® with enhanced, innovative product attributes for increased performance and a long life. Our Specialty line helps you cover all of your niche market and unique application needs, delivering outstanding stopping power in extreme-use situations. You now will get the same great product in easy-to-understand family packaging all with no part number changes. RELY ON RAYBESTOS® AS YOUR PREMIER BRAKE PARTNER TO HELP GROW YOUR BUSINESS. PREMIUM LINE ENHANCED FOR ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE This innovative offering features upgraded product attributes including EHT friction formulations, coated rotors, new plated calipers, and new OE-matched hydraulics providing a full selection of components for complete braking system coverage and unparalleled performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka2763 Daiha Sirion 昌王 Ka2123 Toyota 12R,4K/Km20 Toyota
    KA2763 DAIHA SIRION KA2123 TOYOTA 12R,4K/KM20 TOYOTA LEICESTR KA2137 TOYOTA YH50/2Y,HAICE LITEACE YH50/2Y KA2142 TOYOTA RY30 ONE TRUCK MITSUBISHI FUSO+Trucks KA2136 HINO+Trucks TOYOTA+Fork LiFts W 14B KA2128 TOYOTA KA2152 TOYOTA COMMUTER KA2185 GRANVIA,HI-ACE,REGIUS TURING HIACE TOYOTA LS120 KA2149 PICKUPL4 2.4L 2366cc SUPRA KA2143 TOYOTA MODELL F KA2147 LAND CRUISER L6 4.5L KA2714 CHARADE G10 EXCL TURBO KA2139 PICKUP L4 2.4L Diesel ISUZU Trooper UBS52 KA2170 HIACE 4Y 4y KA2140 LAND CRUISER MIDI CADY KA2113 LAND CRUISER KA2104 TOYOTA JEEP 3400 3400 5VZFE,VZJ95 KA2135 STRALET DAIHA-CHARMANT COROLLA KA2188 LAND CRUISER 30D-43 DFJ80-2F/JEEP4500 30d-43 DFJ80-2F/4500 KA21038 JEEP 4700 JJ100/IZUFE V8 4700 JJ100 V8 KA2109 COROLLA L4 1.1L 1077cc STARLETL4 1.3L 1290cc KA2182A TOYOTA TOWN ACE KA2523 TOYOTA T100TRUCK ISUZU T100 V KA21016 TOYOTA PRADO 4.0 FJ CRUISER DAIHATSU KA810159 PRIUS KA2154 TOYOTA HULIUX KA2184 TOYOTA KA2167 TOYOTA CONFORT CROWN 5R 22R MARKII,CHASER KA2131 HIULUX KA2130 TOYOTA HIULUX KA2190 CROWN 2.8M S132/5M KA2125 COSTER2000 DYNA2000 MARKII 18R CRESTA KA2164A TOYOTA KA1054 OPTI MIRA COURE TOYOTA KA2153A STARLET 1.3/2EELU.2E cultus1.0,1.3G10T Z KA2148 TOYOTA LITEACE WAGON KA2105 GS300 KA21014 PRUIUS KA2103 CARINA E AVENSIS LIFTBACK AVENSIS KA2122 AVENSIS LIFTBACK CARINA AVENSIS STATION WAGON KA2110 TOYOTA KA810257 HIGHLANDER HYBRID RX 400h KA21022 LEXUS RAV4 II 2.2D-4D RAV4 II 2.2D-CAT KA2151 AVENSIS AVENSIS LIFTBACK PREVIA RAV4 II KA2127 HILUX SURF LAND CRUISER KA2193 MARK II CHASER CRESTA KA2147N DYNA AUTOBUS DYNA
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive Industry Weekly Digest
    Automotive Industry Weekly Digest 12 Apr – 16 Apr 2021 IHS Markit Automotive Industry Weekly Digest - Apr 2021 WeChat Auto VIP Contents [OEM Highlights] GMC reveals Hummer electric SUV, ahead of early 2023 availability 3 [OEM Highlights] Xiaomi to invest up to USD10 bil. in EV production 6 [Sales Highlights] GM to unveil Envision Plus SUV on 18 April, reports sales growth of 69% y/y in China during Q1 8 [Sales Highlights] BYD posts sales growth of 33% y/y during March 9 [Shanghai Motor Show 2021] MG to unveil Cyberster sports car 11 [Shanghai Motor Show 2021] Xpeng to unveil P5 electric sedan 11 [GSP] Greater China Sales and Production Commentary -2021.03 13 [Supplier Trends and Highlights] HKT uses 5G standalone network with network slicing for trials of C-V2X applications 15 [Supplier Trends and Highlights] Commsignia combines cloud and V2X messaging in 4G, 5G V2N solution 15 Confidential. ©2021 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 2 IHS Markit Automotive Industry Weekly Digest - Apr 2021 WeChat Auto VIP [OEM Highlights] GMC reveals Hummer electric SUV, ahead of early 2023 availability IHS Markit perspective Implications GMC has revealed the GMC Hummer electric SUV, debuted during a college basketball championship tournament on 3 April. The new EV is due in early 2023 as a 2024 model year product. Outlook Between the October 2020 reveal of the GMC Hummer electric pick-up and the Hummer electric SUV, GM has continued to push forward with announcements relative to investment and plans for an all-electric light-vehicle range by 2035. The GMC Hummer electric SUV and pick-up both are to set expectations on delivery of high levels of capability and performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Dossier
    Final Project Dossier LIKE NOTHING ELSE - 1 - Table of contents I. Company Overview Company background information………………………………….4 Company missions and goals………………………………………..6 Overview of its products…………………………………………….8 Swot analysis……………………………………………………….11 Industry analysis……………………………………………………12 Potential crisis that the company may face…………………………13 II. Crisis Communication Plan The objectives of the plan…………………………………………16 The crisis communication team……………………………………17 The positioning of Hummer………………………………………..20 The key audience/ stakeholders…………………………………….22 Media Policies and Procedure………………………………………24 Sample of news release……………………………………………...26 Recommended evaluation and follow up……………………………28 Bibliography …………………………………………………….29 - 2 - COMPANY OVERVIEW - 3 - Company background information Hummer SUV’s are widely spread in the world and especially in America. The tank-like cars are widely known and from a foreign point of view Hummer clearly appears as the American Car by excellence. Its military features, make Hummer SUV’s the most unique and instantly recognizable vehicle of the world. Those very military features have been one of the major selling point and that since the very beginning. Hummer history Back to HUMMER roots: the JEEP In 1970, American Motors bought Kaiser-Jeep, the Military vehicle Retailer and renamed it the Jeep Corporation. At that point, Jeep was producing vehicles through two divisions: the Commercial Products division and the Government Products division. A military car 1971, the Government Products division was spun off as a wholly owned subsidiary known as AM General. In the early 1980s, the company, now owned by the LTV Corporation, designed a vehicle to compete for a contract offered by the U.S. Army. Called the High Mobility Multi- Purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV, or Humvee, as it came to be known) The Creation of the Brand AM General's Humvees distinguished themselves in active duty during the Persian Gulf War in the early 90’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans
    DOT HS 809 868 June 2005 NHTSA Technical Report Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT HS 809 868 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2005 Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Marie C. Walz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation Planning, Evaluation and Budget 11. Contract or Grant No. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 20590 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Rollover crashes kill more than 10,000 occupants of passenger vehicles each year. As part of its mission to reduce fatalities and injuries, since model year 2001 NHTSA has included rollover information as part of its NCAP ratings. One of the primary means of assessing rollover risk is the static stability factor (SSF), a measurement of a vehicle’s resistance to rollover. The higher the SSF, the lower the rollover risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Acura TL Is Proof That Power Can Be Thoroughly Refined, Yet Still Retain Every Bit of Its Capacity to Thrill
    “ The driver walking up to their TL has to have a sense, THE 2014 right away, that it’s going to be fun to drive.” ACURA TL Jon Ikeda Acura Chief Designer Information Provided by: BUILT TO SATISFY EVERY NEED. EVEN YOUR MORE PRIMAL ONES. A TAILORED SILHOUETTE and sculpted lines evoke a sense of anticipation. Aggressive details like darkened headlights and bold wheel design speak to the power within. Sharply honed performance reinforces the bond between driver and vehicle. The 2014 Acura TL is proof that power can be thoroughly refined, yet still retain every bit of its capacity to thrill. “ The TL manages to blend impeccable comfort with enthusiastic performance.” AUTOMOBILE Magazine1 Information Provided by: TEXTURES AND FINISHES utilized in the headlight design add to the vehicle’s uniqueness and visual appeal. “ This thing will corner at speeds that will drain the blood from your head.” AutoWeek 2 Information Provided by: AMONG THE DESIGN INFLUENCES for the TL’s exterior was the look and feel of DECEPTIVELY a high-end watch. As with a fine timepiece, the closer you look at the TL, the more intricately textured and detailed different elements become. From the use of gloss-black details to the matte-black mesh that calls to mind the aggressiveness CIVILIZED. of past TL designs, everything works together. It is this level of detail that makes the TL more intriguing and, ultimately, that much more special to its owner. Information Provided by: 10 -WAY POWER DRIVER'S SEAT features a combination of soft and dense materials to help filter out road vibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Acura TL 2009
    2009 ACURA TL The new, fourth-generation TL is noticeably larger than its predecessor. It gains 15.7 cm in length, 3.5 cm in the wheelbase, 4.6 cm in width and 1.1 cm in height. It is weightier, too, by 70 to 155 kg, depending on the model. The latter weight increase is explained by the fact that, for the first time, the TL has access to Super Handling-All Wheel Drive, or SH-AWD for short. The base model houses a 3.5-litre V6 under the hood, whereas a 3.7-litre V6 powers the SH-AWD model. Interior and trunk Front access is complicated by wide doorsills that attract dirt, and beefy seat bolstering. The seats are very comfortable and hold the occupants very snugly in place. Some people will find that the head restraints crowd to their head. Drivers enjoy a very good driving position. Headroom and legroom are relatively generous. The rear doors do not open very wide, the openings are small and the doorsills are wide and pick up dirt, which makes it difficult to access the back. Grime collects on the rear edge of the rocker panel and can easily end up on your clothes. The seat is comfortable for just two, as the middle section is anything but accommodating. Headroom and legroom are average. If the front passengers adjust their seats even a bit lower, there is almost no foot room left for the rear passengers. The seatback does not fold but it does have a small ski pass-through.
    [Show full text]
  • In Response to Your Recent Request for Information Regarding; Within Your Constabulary, What Is the Highest Speed (Mph) Recorde
    Uned Rhyddid Gwybodaeth / Freedom of Information Unit Response Date: 25/05/2018 2018/444 – Highest Speed In response to your recent request for information regarding; Within your constabulary, what is the highest speed (mph) recorded from 1st January 2017 up to and including May 2018. Please break this down to include the make and model of the car caught speeding and also by any one detection method. For example – a Toyota Yaris was caught speeding at 71mph in a 60mph zone in November 2017 Within your constabulary, in this time period, what is the most common car make and model caught speeding? The highest speed recorded was a BMW 330D AC AUTO travelling at 141 mph, captured by a mobile camera unit in October 2017. Vehicle makes and models are not retained in the system for notices we are unable to process, so we do not have a definitive list of all types. Also, vehicles are recorded in the camera system including all model varieties. It isn’t possible to consolidate all these simply into one model group. I have attached a full list for you to analyse. THIS INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000, AND IS CORRECT AS AT 18/05/2018 Vehicle Total ABARTH 500 9 ABARTH 500 CUSTOM 2 ABARTH 595 1 ABARTH 595 COMPETIZONE 1 ABARTH 595 TURISMO 4 ABARTH 595 TURISMO S-A 2 ABARTH 595C COMPETIZIONE 1 ABARTH 595C COMPETIZONE S-A 1 AIXAM CROSSLINE MINAUTO CVT 1 AJS JS 125-E2 1 ALEXANDER DENNIS 11 ALFA ROMEO 2 ALFA ROMEO 147 1 ALFA ROMEO 147 COLLEZIONE JTDM 1 ALFA ROMEO 147 COLLEZIONE JTDM 8V 1 ALFA
    [Show full text]
  • IVIC Notifications
    Department of Transportation Safety Division Towing Section 9/30/2019 NOTICE TO LAST KNOWN REGISTERED OWNERS AND SECURED PARTIES OF ABANDONED VEHICLES TAKEN INTO CUSTODY BY THE POLICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-205 OF THE TRANSPORTATION ARTICLE OF THE MARYLAND ANNOTATED CODE, THIS IS TO GIVE NOTICE THAT VARIOUS VEHICLES HAVE BEEN TAKEN INTO CUSTODY AND ARE NOW STORED AT THE TOWING SECTION LOCATED AT 6700 PULASKI HIGHWAY, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21237. ALL REGISTERED OWNERS AND SECURED PARTIES OF THESE VEHICLES HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECLAIM THEIR VEHICLES WITHIN ELEVEN (11) WORKING DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE SO LONG AS ALL TOWING, PRESERVATION AND STORAGE CHARGES ARE PAID. FAILURE OF AN OWNER OR SECURED PARTY TO EXERCISE THIS RIGHT WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED ABOVE CONSTITUTES A WAIVER BY THEM OF ALL RIGHTS, TITLE AND INTEREST IN THEIR VEHICLE AND WILL BE CONSIDERED THEIR CONSENT TO THE SALE OF THE VEHICLE AT PUBLIC AUCTION OR RETENTION OF THE VEHICLE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. VISIT OUR WEBSITES: WWW.BALTIMORECITY.GOV/GOVERNMENT/TRANSPORTATION AND WWW.BALTIMORECITYTOWING.NET TO VIEW THE FULL LISTING OF THESE “UNCLAIMED” VEHICLES. Babatunde Yussuf ACTING TOWING MANAGER Page: 1 Year Make Type Serial Number Prop.No. 01 ACURA 3.2 TL CAR 19UUA56601A018311 P383399 99 ACURA CL CAR 19UYA3256XL004204 P383605 04 ACURA RL CAR JH4KA96684C006833 P383409 99 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA5657XA023196 P383521 99 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA5641XA051695 P383692 99 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA5645XA051554 P383760 00 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA5665YA007069 P383847 01 ACURA TL CAR 19UYA42611A000398 P383510 04 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA66284A026860 P383361 04 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA66224A063273 P383377 04 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA66284A069143 P383731 05 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA56972A042102 P382737 06 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA66296A035831 P383689 06 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA662X6A006998 P383851 08 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA662X8A056609 P383933 09 ACURA TL CAR 19UUA86559A003727 P383964 Department of Transportation Safety Division Towing Section Newspaper Advertisement Listing Schedule for 9/30/2019 Page: 2 Year Make Type Serial Number Prop.No.
    [Show full text]
  • Acura TL (2014)
    THIS IS TL RE FI NE REFINEMENT REDEFINED The 2014 Acura TL seamlessly blends sophistication with exhilaration by refining the space, and redefining the experience, behind the wheel. Heart-racing horsepower and confidence-raising handling empower the driver, while cutting- edge technology effortlessly integrates them with the car. Impeccably stylish, innovatively designed, and incredibly well equipped, the TL sets the bar for luxury in a sedan. PERFORMANCE ARTIST Don’t just turn the next corner, take it. With the available Super Handling All-Wheel Drive™ (SH-AWD®) system in the 2014 TL, you’ll have the confidence to do just that. Acura’s innovative system detects road conditions and reacts accordingly by alternating torque from front to rear wheels, as well as splitting rear-wheel torque from left to right for a continuously smooth ride and an increasingly confident driver. TWO DIFFERENT ENGINES. GENEROUS HORSEPOWER PADDLE SPORT ONE COMMON GOAL. AND TORQUE SHIFTERS SUSPENSION Standard in the TL, but not at all standard, Whether it’s the 305 hp and 273 lb.-ft. of Racing-inspired paddle shifters mounted 4-wheel independent double-wishbone front is an adrenaline boosting 3.5-litre, 24-valve, torque produced by the available 3.7-litre VTEC intuitively behind the TL’s leather-wrapped and rear multi-link suspension are engineered VTEC® V6 engine. TL models with SH-AWD® power plant, or the 280 hp and 254 lb.-ft. of steering wheel not only pair the excitement to give you enviable stability and flat cornering are upgraded to a 3.7-litre, 24-valve, VTEC V6 torque imparted by the 3.5-litre VTEC engine, of manual gear shifting with the performance response.
    [Show full text]