DOCSLIB.ORG

IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 IMPROVER Impact Assessment of Road Safety Measures for Vehicles and Road Equipment Final Report APPENDICES Subproject 1 Impact on road safety due to the increasing of sports utility and multipurpose vehicles TNO, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Netherlands BASt Federal Highway Research Institute, Germany TRL Transport Research Laboratory Limited, United Kingdom VTI National Road and Transport Research Institute, Sweden Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden UTAC, L'Union Technique de l'Automobile, du Motocycle et du Cycle, France April 2006 1 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 With the following partners: • TNO, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Netherlands (Author: C. van der Zweep) • BASt Federal Highway Research Institute, Germany (Authors: C. Pastor, B. Bugsel and J. Gail) • Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden (Author: R. Thomson) • TRL Transport Research Laboratory Limited, United Kingdom (Authors: T. Brightman and T. Horberry) • UTAC, L'Union Technique de l'Automobile, du Motocycle et du Cycle, France (Author: T. Martin) • VTI National Road and Transport Research Institute, Sweden (Author: T. Turbell) 2 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 Contents of appendices Contents of appendices............................................................................................3 WP 1.1 Report ...............................................................................................5 1 Data collection on SUV and MPV .....................................................................6 1.1 Defining Sport Utility (SUVs) and Multi-Purpose Vehicles (MPVs) ............6 1.2 Sales figures............................................................................................13 1.3 Issues reported world wide regarding SUVs and MPVs safety................16 1.4 Conclusions.............................................................................................26 2 National statistics............................................................................................27 2.1 Approach .................................................................................................27 2.2 Detailed requirements .............................................................................28 2.3 Data analyses..........................................................................................28 2.4 Conclusions.............................................................................................32 3 Conclusions ....................................................................................................34 3.1 SUV and MPV definition ..........................................................................34 3.2 Sales numbers.........................................................................................34 3.3 Safety issues reported world wide...........................................................34 3.4 National statistics.....................................................................................34 4 References .....................................................................................................36 WP 1.2 Report .............................................................................................38 1 Abstract ..........................................................................................................39 2 German database GIDAS...............................................................................40 2.1 Method and Database .............................................................................40 2.2 Scope of the Data....................................................................................41 2.3 SUV Single Car Accidents.......................................................................41 2.4 SUV to Pedestrian Accidents ..................................................................44 2.5 SUV to Passenger Car Accidents............................................................45 2.6 SUV to Truck Accidents...........................................................................48 2.7 Conclusions.............................................................................................49 2.8 Recommendations...................................................................................49 3 UK database CCIS .........................................................................................51 3.1 Background .............................................................................................51 3.2 Method - Selection of Cases ...................................................................51 3.3 Car/SUV compatibility:.............................................................................51 3.4 In depth Study Results ............................................................................53 3.5 Conclusions.............................................................................................62 3.6 Recommendations:..................................................................................63 WP 1.3 Report .............................................................................................64 1 Analysis of SUV compatibility problem ...........................................................65 1.1 Measurement of structural parameters....................................................65 1.2 Fleet studies ............................................................................................65 1.3 Road restraint systems............................................................................65 2 Measurement of structural parameters...........................................................66 2.1 Introduction..............................................................................................66 2.2 Method ....................................................................................................66 2.3 Results ....................................................................................................68 2.4 Conclusion...............................................................................................74 3 Fleet Analysis of SUV Safety..........................................................................75 3 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 3.1 Mass independent approach Fleet systems analysis ..............................75 3.2 Conclusions.............................................................................................77 3.3 Geometrical approach Fleet systems analysis ........................................77 4 SUVs and the Standards EN1317 and EN12767 ...........................................87 4.1 Introduction..............................................................................................87 4.2 Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................88 4.3 Conclusions.............................................................................................90 5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................91 6 References .....................................................................................................93 WP 1.4 Report .............................................................................................94 1 Environmental performance of SUVs and MPVs ............................................95 1.1 Objective .................................................................................................95 1.2 Methodology............................................................................................95 1.3 Results ....................................................................................................96 1.4 Conclusion.............................................................................................101 1.5 Recommendations.................................................................................102 1.6 Literature ...............................................................................................102 4 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 IMPROVER SP1 Impact Assessment of Road Safety Measures for Vehicles and Road Equipment WP 1.1 Report Data collection Impact on road safety due to the increasing of sports utility and multipurpose vehicles with the following partners: • TNO, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Netherlands • BASt Federal Highway Research Institute, Germany • Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden • TRL Transport Research Laboratory Limited, United Kingdom • UTAC, France • VTI National Road and Transport Research Institute, Sweden 5 IMPROVER Final Report: Subproject 1 TREN-04-ST-S07.37022 1 Data collection on SUV and MPV 1.1 Defining Sport Utility (SUVs) and Multi-Purpose Vehicles (MPVs) 1.1.1 Abstract The classification of cars according to their body shape is quite often used for categorising cars e.g. in crashworthiness ratings. Historically this classification has been introduced by car manufacturers. Some categories have been taken over by motor magazines, consumer organisations and also by accident researchers. However, a technically or legally based definition of the categories is often missing. The emerging discussion on Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs), which initially started in the USA, demands for a clear cut definition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeep® 4X4 Systems Jeep Glossary
    Contact: Cole Quinnell Jeep® Four-Wheel-Drive Glossary August 7, 2005, Auburn Hills, Mich. - Angle of Approach From level ground, this is the degree of slope a vehicle can approach without scraping or hitting any components ahead of the front tires. Angle of approach is a great indication of the ability to navigate severe off-road terrain like boulders and logs. A short front overhang produces high angles of approach, thus increasing off-road ability. Angle of Departure Whatever goes over an obstacle must come back down. In returning to level ground, the angle of departure indicates the degree of slope a vehicle can depart from without scraping or hitting the lowest, rear most part of the vehicle. Articulation The ability of one tire to move relative to the chassis or the other wheel – left wheel up, right wheel down. Articulation makes it possible for the wheels to stay in contact with the ground (and retain traction) on very uneven terrain. Axle Ratio Usually expressed as driveshaft revolutions to each revolution of the tire. A ratio of 3.55:1 means the driveshaft turns 3.55 times for every one turn of the tires. Breakover Angle The degree of slope that defines the largest obstacle that a vehicle can travel over without scraping the peak of the obstacle against the frame or underbody components. Compression Braking When the compression of the engine resists wheel rotation to help control the speed of a vehicle. This results in controlled hill descent without the use of brakes. Crawl Ratio This is the final drive ratio of a vehicle in low-range.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NFPA 1917 Standards
    Copyright 2018 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA®). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and download on 12/12/2018 to Delaware Fire Prev Comm for designated user Sherry Lambertson. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA®. For inquiries or to report unauthorized use, contact [email protected]. NFPA® 1917 Standard for Automotive Ambulances 2019{4474F64E-7E00-4BF2-BBD3-B3778A4FF0E1} Customer ID 1029731 Copyright 2018 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA®). Licensed, by agreement, for individual use and download on 12/12/2018 to Delaware Fire Prev Comm for designated user Sherry Lambertson. No other reproduction or transmission in any form permitted without written permission of NFPA®. For inquiries or to report unauthorized use, contact [email protected]. IMPORTANT NOTICES AND DISCLAIMERS CONCERNING NFPA® STANDARDS NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY CONCERNING THE USE OF NFPA STANDARDS NFPA® codes, standards, recommended practices, and guides (“NFPA Standards”), of which the document contained herein is one, are developed through a consensus standards development process approved by the American National Standards Institute. This process brings together volunteers representing varied viewpoints and interests to achieve consensus on fire and other safety issues. While the NFPA administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the development of consensus, it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in NFPA Standards. The NFPA disclaims liability for any personal injury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, or reliance on NFPA Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Dodge Durango
    SEDANS MINIVANS/CROSSOVERS SPORT UTILITY TRUCKS/COMMERCIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2021 DODGE DURANGO SELECT STANDARD FEATURES Air Conditioning with Tri-Zone Temperature Control Air Filtering Audio Controls — Steering wheel-mounted Automatic Headlamps Auxiliary Power Outlet — 12-volt Battery — 650-amp on all but R/T; R/T has 700-amp maintenance-free with battery-saver feature Brakes — Four-wheel disc — Antilock with Electronic Brake-Force Distribution Child Seat Anchor System — Lower child-seat anchors and upper tether anchors help ease the installation of compatible aftermarket child seats Console — Full-length floor and overhead with two lamps, sunglasses storage and available Universal Garage Door Opener controls Electronic Stability Control(3) — With Electronic Roll Mitigation, All-Speed Traction Control, Brake Assist and four-wheel disc antilock brake system Enhanced Accident Response System 2020MY image shown. Floor Mats — Luxury, front and rear Fog Lamps Front and Rear Interior LED Lamps Glass — Deep-tint sunscreen on rear doors, quarter-panel and liftgate Hill Start Assist Locks — Power SAFETY & SECURITY Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop(12) — Available Air Bags(2) — Advanced multistage driver and front-passenger, advanced side-curtain and supplemental front-seat side — Standard Blind Spot Monitoring(21) with Rear Cross-Path Detection(22) — Available Full-Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus(11) — Available Lane Departure Warning Plus(19) — Available Trailer Sway Control(3) — Standard ENGINES HORSEPOWER(17) TORQUE(17) 3.6L Pentastar® V6 295 hp @ 6,400 rpm 260 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm 5.7L HEMI® V8 360 hp @ 5,150 rpm 390 lb-ft @ 4,250 rpm 2020MY image shown. 2020MY image shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
    U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 808 570 January 1997 NHTSA Technical Report Relationships between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Go ,i on No. 3, Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 808 570 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Dote January 1997 Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk 6. Performing Organization Code in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 8. Performing Organization Report No 7. Author's) Charles J. Kahane, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Wort Unit No. (TRAIS) Evaluation Division, Plans and Policy National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Conrroct or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Cohered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary. Notes NHTSA Reports DOT HS 808 569 through DOT HS 808 575 address vehicle size and safety. 16. Abstract Fatality rates per million exposure years are computed by make, model and model year, based on the crash experience of model year 1985-93 passenger cars and light trucks (pickups, vans and sport utility vehicles) in the United States during calendar years 1989-93.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheel Cylinder the Best in Brakes Made Easy
    BPI-WCAG19B -L-, /z_ 1 2 c�Z Z l /l {2 t1 le() � J ® The I in brakes APPLICATION GUIDE Wheel Cylinder The Best in Brakes Made Easy. Raybestos® has been a giant in the automotive aftermarket industry for over a century. As an industry leader, Raybestos® is committed to manufacturing high-quality brake parts that offer unparalleled performance and safety. From friction to rotors, calipers to hydraulics, Raybestos® produces dependable brake parts with expansive coverage. All of our products are extensively tested so you can be sure you are buying a product that is reliable and safe. Raybestos delivers brake parts you can count on. Raybestos® had our customers in mind when we decided to realign our product offering into three distinct lines. When you think of Raybestos®, you think of The Best in Brakes®. That is what our R-Line delivers. It is a reliable family of products focused on every day driving. Our Element3™ line is The Best in Brakes® with enhanced, innovative product attributes for increased performance and a long life. Our Specialty line helps you cover all of your niche market and unique application needs, delivering outstanding stopping power in extreme-use situations. You now will get the same great product in easy-to-understand family packaging all with no part number changes. RELY ON RAYBESTOS® AS YOUR PREMIER BRAKE PARTNER TO HELP GROW YOUR BUSINESS. PREMIUM LINE ENHANCED FOR ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE This innovative offering features upgraded product attributes including EHT friction formulations, coated rotors, new plated calipers, and new OE-matched hydraulics providing a full selection of components for complete braking system coverage and unparalleled performance.
    [Show full text]
  • 26147B AM General 10/14/04 2:17 PM Page 1
    26147B AM General 10/14/04 2:17 PM Page 1 HMMWVM998A2M998A2 SERIES SERIES SS PECIFICATIONSPECIFICATIONS && PPERFORMANCEERFORMANCE DD ATAATA 26147B AM General 10/13/04 12:59 PM Page 2 the High Mobility Multi-purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) has served soldiers around the world. From peacekeeping operations to combat, the HMMWV has proven itself again and Since its fielding again as the most versatile, dependable and mobile tactical wheeled vehicle available today. Just ask the soldiers who drive them. The concept of a single platform with multiple mission roles is critical to reducing logistics complexity. HMMWV is that platform. With over 65 different combat and combat support systems already fielded on HMMWVs, it’s no wonder that HMMWV is the light tactical wheeled vehicle of choice. AM General continues to improve the capabilities of HMMWVs by incorporating the latest automotive technology to better satisfy the expanded roles and missions of armed forces worldwide. The “Expanded Capacity” HMMWVs are a perfect example. These HMMWV variants have a greater payload and a more powerful diesel engine than the standard HMMWVs. Compare the HMMWV family of vehicles to any other light tactical wheeled vehicle, and we’re sure you’ll agree: nothing else is as mobile, dependable, or cost effective. Multiple missions…single platform. HMMWV. Built to the rigid quality standards of ISO 9001. 26147B AM General 10/13/04 12:59 PM Page 3 Over 160,000 HMMWVs have been delivered to the United States Armed Forces and more than three dozen overseas nations. HMMWVs, available in numerous configurations, are built to meet the most severe needs of the military.
    [Show full text]
  • M1165A1 Special Ops
    PERFORMANCE • PAYLOAD • PROTECTION M1100 SERIES HMMWV M1165A1 Special Ops PERFORMANCE — HMMWV is the world-standard family of light, tactical vehicles. It is a lightweight, high-performance, independent four-wheel drive, versatile and adaptable platform that currently supports more than 100 different systems. PAYLOAD — The M1165A1 Special Ops HMMWV is specifically designed to support operational requirements under increased payloads without sacrificing mobility, dependability or performance. Payload varies by armor configuration and fragmentation kit, and ranges from 2,230 to 4,950 lb. Air transportable and droppable, the M1165A1 can be sling-loaded by helicopter. PROTECTION — In addition to the factory-installed “A” armor kit, the M1165A1 Special Operations HMMWV can be supplemented with additional armor, which is tailored to meet specific mission requirements. M1100 SERIES HMMWV M1165A1 Special Ops GVW Ramp Breakover Angle Geared Hub M1165: 12,100 lb. (5,488 kg) 25º Ratios: 1.92:1 M1165A1: 12,100 lb. (5,488 kg) Grade Capability (at GCW) Wheels M1165A1 w/B3: 12,100 lb. 40% Two-Piece Take Apart; (5,488 kg) 16.5 x 8.25 x 6.5 BC Side Slope Capability (at GCW) M1100 FAMILY OF VEHICLES Payload 30% Tires M1165: 4,950 lb. (2,245 kg) Non-Directional M1165A1: 4,870 lb. (2,209 kg) Climb Capability (at GCW) Cross-Country Tread; M1165A1 w/B3: 2,230 lb. 18 in. (45.72 cm) 37 x 12.5R-16.5; (1,102 kg) Vertical Step Load Range: E Curb Weight Cargo Bed Height (at GCW) Service Brakes M1165: 6,550 lb. (2,971 kg) 38.5 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka2763 Daiha Sirion 昌王 Ka2123 Toyota 12R,4K/Km20 Toyota
    KA2763 DAIHA SIRION KA2123 TOYOTA 12R,4K/KM20 TOYOTA LEICESTR KA2137 TOYOTA YH50/2Y,HAICE LITEACE YH50/2Y KA2142 TOYOTA RY30 ONE TRUCK MITSUBISHI FUSO+Trucks KA2136 HINO+Trucks TOYOTA+Fork LiFts W 14B KA2128 TOYOTA KA2152 TOYOTA COMMUTER KA2185 GRANVIA,HI-ACE,REGIUS TURING HIACE TOYOTA LS120 KA2149 PICKUPL4 2.4L 2366cc SUPRA KA2143 TOYOTA MODELL F KA2147 LAND CRUISER L6 4.5L KA2714 CHARADE G10 EXCL TURBO KA2139 PICKUP L4 2.4L Diesel ISUZU Trooper UBS52 KA2170 HIACE 4Y 4y KA2140 LAND CRUISER MIDI CADY KA2113 LAND CRUISER KA2104 TOYOTA JEEP 3400 3400 5VZFE,VZJ95 KA2135 STRALET DAIHA-CHARMANT COROLLA KA2188 LAND CRUISER 30D-43 DFJ80-2F/JEEP4500 30d-43 DFJ80-2F/4500 KA21038 JEEP 4700 JJ100/IZUFE V8 4700 JJ100 V8 KA2109 COROLLA L4 1.1L 1077cc STARLETL4 1.3L 1290cc KA2182A TOYOTA TOWN ACE KA2523 TOYOTA T100TRUCK ISUZU T100 V KA21016 TOYOTA PRADO 4.0 FJ CRUISER DAIHATSU KA810159 PRIUS KA2154 TOYOTA HULIUX KA2184 TOYOTA KA2167 TOYOTA CONFORT CROWN 5R 22R MARKII,CHASER KA2131 HIULUX KA2130 TOYOTA HIULUX KA2190 CROWN 2.8M S132/5M KA2125 COSTER2000 DYNA2000 MARKII 18R CRESTA KA2164A TOYOTA KA1054 OPTI MIRA COURE TOYOTA KA2153A STARLET 1.3/2EELU.2E cultus1.0,1.3G10T Z KA2148 TOYOTA LITEACE WAGON KA2105 GS300 KA21014 PRUIUS KA2103 CARINA E AVENSIS LIFTBACK AVENSIS KA2122 AVENSIS LIFTBACK CARINA AVENSIS STATION WAGON KA2110 TOYOTA KA810257 HIGHLANDER HYBRID RX 400h KA21022 LEXUS RAV4 II 2.2D-4D RAV4 II 2.2D-CAT KA2151 AVENSIS AVENSIS LIFTBACK PREVIA RAV4 II KA2127 HILUX SURF LAND CRUISER KA2193 MARK II CHASER CRESTA KA2147N DYNA AUTOBUS DYNA
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans
    DOT HS 809 868 June 2005 NHTSA Technical Report Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT HS 809 868 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2005 Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Marie C. Walz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation Planning, Evaluation and Budget 11. Contract or Grant No. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 20590 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Rollover crashes kill more than 10,000 occupants of passenger vehicles each year. As part of its mission to reduce fatalities and injuries, since model year 2001 NHTSA has included rollover information as part of its NCAP ratings. One of the primary means of assessing rollover risk is the static stability factor (SSF), a measurement of a vehicle’s resistance to rollover. The higher the SSF, the lower the rollover risk.
    [Show full text]
  • In Response to Your Recent Request for Information Regarding; Within Your Constabulary, What Is the Highest Speed (Mph) Recorde
    Uned Rhyddid Gwybodaeth / Freedom of Information Unit Response Date: 25/05/2018 2018/444 – Highest Speed In response to your recent request for information regarding; Within your constabulary, what is the highest speed (mph) recorded from 1st January 2017 up to and including May 2018. Please break this down to include the make and model of the car caught speeding and also by any one detection method. For example – a Toyota Yaris was caught speeding at 71mph in a 60mph zone in November 2017 Within your constabulary, in this time period, what is the most common car make and model caught speeding? The highest speed recorded was a BMW 330D AC AUTO travelling at 141 mph, captured by a mobile camera unit in October 2017. Vehicle makes and models are not retained in the system for notices we are unable to process, so we do not have a definitive list of all types. Also, vehicles are recorded in the camera system including all model varieties. It isn’t possible to consolidate all these simply into one model group. I have attached a full list for you to analyse. THIS INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000, AND IS CORRECT AS AT 18/05/2018 Vehicle Total ABARTH 500 9 ABARTH 500 CUSTOM 2 ABARTH 595 1 ABARTH 595 COMPETIZONE 1 ABARTH 595 TURISMO 4 ABARTH 595 TURISMO S-A 2 ABARTH 595C COMPETIZIONE 1 ABARTH 595C COMPETIZONE S-A 1 AIXAM CROSSLINE MINAUTO CVT 1 AJS JS 125-E2 1 ALEXANDER DENNIS 11 ALFA ROMEO 2 ALFA ROMEO 147 1 ALFA ROMEO 147 COLLEZIONE JTDM 1 ALFA ROMEO 147 COLLEZIONE JTDM 8V 1 ALFA
    [Show full text]
  • 4X4 Catalogue March 2011
    ENJOY THE RIDE... ...RIDE TO ENJOY SPRING & SUSPENSION 4x4 Catalogue March 2011 1 | Daihatsu 5 | Ford 11 | GM / Chevrolet 12 | General Motors 13 | Great Wall 15 | Holden - GM - Isuzu 22 | Isuzu 23 | Honda 25 | Hyundai 26 | Jeep 36 | Kia 39 | Lada 40 | Landrover 49 | Mazda 51 | Mercedes 53 | Mitsubishi 63 | Nissan 85 | Ssangyong 90 | Subaru 91 | Suzuki 99 | Toyota 143 | UAZ While we take all care in the preparation of this catalogue, we also realise errors can occur. Please confirm that the parts you are ordering are correct for your requirements. No responsibility is implied or taken. The names and reference numbers of manufacturers and suppliers, other than Dobinsons Spring & Suspension, used in this catalogue are shown only to assist our customers in identifying replacement parts. Under no circumstances does Dobinsons Spring & Suspension imply that the parts are of these OE manufacturers. Dobinsons Spring & Suspension | www.dobinsonsprings.com ABN: 22 751 879 972 i ENJOY THE RIDE... ...RIDE TO ENJOY SPRING & SUSPENSION MAKE: DAIHATSU TYPE: Rocky DAIHATSU Daihatsu MODEL: F70, F75, F80, F85RV YEAR: 1984 - 08/1993 DETAIL: Hardtop, Rugger, Fourtrak, Wildcat DAI-53 PART PART QTY FRONT NUMBER REAR QTY NUMBER Price Code Price Code LEAF SPRING (if applicable) LEAF SPRING (if applicable) Single Stage Two Stage 5 Leaves 1 F77-5L-F RH 4+1 Leaves Raised Height (40mm Lift) 1 F77-5L-F LH Raised Height (40mm Lift) 2 DAI-011-R SHACKLE BUSH KIT SHACKLE BUSH KIT Kit Contains: Kit Contains: 2 x SPF239 4 x SPF238 2 x SPF238 4 x SPF560 1 PB15-1062K 4 x SPF560 1 PB15-1064K U-BOLT KIT U-BOLT KIT Type A Type A Kit Contains: Right Hand Side - 1 x UB15-658 1 x UB15-659 1 UB15-659K Kit Contains: Left Hand Side - 2 x UB15-658 1 UB15-658K 2 x UB15-658 2 UB15-658K SHOCK ABSORBER SHOCK ABSORBER Heavy Duty Twin Tube Gas 2 GS59-639S Heavy Duty Twin Tube Gas 2 GS15-639S Torsion Bars: Sold in Pairs 1 Coil Springs: Sold in Pairs, (A) (B) (C) etc..
    [Show full text]
  • Small Suvs, Minicars Make Big Gains in 2006 the Renault Megane CC (Shown) Ended Peugeot’S 5-Year Reign at the Top of Luca Ciferri the Fastest-Growing Segment
    AN_070402_18&19good.qxd 13.04.2007 8:58 Uhr Page 18 PAGE 18 · www.autonewseurope.com April 2, 2007 Market analysis by segment, European sales ROADSTER & CONVERTIBLE Small SUVs, minicars make big gains in 2006 The Renault Megane CC (shown) ended Peugeot’s 5-year reign at the top of Luca Ciferri the fastest-growing segment. Changing segments the roadster and convertible seg- Automotive News Europe Minicars, the No. 3 segment last year in ment. Peugeot’s 307 CC was No. 1 in terms of growth, increased 22.1 percent to Europe’s 2006 winners and losers 2004; the 206 CC led the other years. Rising fuel costs, growing concerns about 992,227 units thanks largely to strong Small SUV +63.6 2006 2005 % Change Seg. share % CO2 and a flurry of new products sparked sales of three cars built at Toyota and Upper premium +26.4 Renault Megane 32,344 42,514 -23.9% 13.4% a sales surge for small SUVs and minicars PSA/Peugeot-Citroen’s plant in Kolin, Minicar +22.1 Peugeot 307CC/306C 31,786 39,640 -19.8% 13.1% in Europe last year. Czech Republic. Peugeot 206 CC 29,833 43,518 -31.4% 12.3% The arrival of three new small SUVs Europe’s largest segment, small cars, Small minivan -13.6 VW Eos 21,759 59 – 9.0% helped the segment grow 63.6 percent to rose 7.0 percent to 3,811,009 units. The Premium roadster & convertible -10.9 Opel/Vauxhall Tigra TwinTop 20,406 32,633 -37.5% 8.4% 94,153 units in 2006, according to UK- second-biggest segment – lower-medium Lower medium -8.2 Mazda MX-5 19,288 9,782 97.2% 8.0% based market researcher JATO Dynamics.
    [Show full text]