DOCSLIB.ORG

PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 The Power Within PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 3 Note. This Annual Report has been formed on the basis of Similarly, “Gazprom Neft Group” and “Gazprom Neft” statements. At the same time, some results of PJSC Gazprom, Resolution No. 1 of PJSC Gazprom’s Management Committee refer to PAO Gazprom Neft and its subsidiaries, “Gazprom its subsidiaries, affiliates and joint ventures are stated in On Organisation of Work Related to Holding the Annual energoholding” refers to OOO Gazprom energoholding and compliance with the principles for preparing management General Shareholders Meeting dated 26 January 2017. its subsidiaries, “Gazprom neftekhim Salavat” refers to accounts. Figures calculated using these methods may differ The terms “PJSC Gazprom”, “the Company” used in OAO Gazprom neftekhim Salavat and its subsidiaries. due to differences in methodologies for preparing consoli- the Annual Report refer to the parent company of Gazprom Some operating and financial results in the Annual dated financial statements and management accounts. Group, i.e. to Public Joint Stock Company Gazprom (until Report are presented in accordance with IFRS and for The analysis of financial results should be considered 17 June 2015 — Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom, Gazpom Group companies as a whole, for the purposes of in the context of PJSC Gazprom’s audited IFRS consolidated JSC Gazprom). The terms “Gazprom Group”, “the Group” PJSC Gazprom’s IFRS consolidated financial statements for financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016. or “Gazprom” imply PJSC Gazprom and its subsidiaries taken the year ended 31 December 2016 and may differ from The Annual Report also contains information related to as a whole. For the purposes of the Annual Report, the lists similar indicators in PJSC Gazprom’s reporting documents Gazprom Group’s business activities in the future, based on of Gazprom Group’s subsidiaries, companies classified as prepared under Russian Accounting Standards (RAS). the forecast and estimates of Gazprom’s management joint operations, affiliates and joint ventures were prepared In this Annual Report, a number of Gazprom’s operating derived from the current situation. Actual results may differ on the basis used in the preparation of PJSC Gazprom’s IFRS and financial results are stated in compliance with the princi- from the said forecast and estimates due to the effect of PJSCconsolidated Gazprom financial Annual Reportstatements. 2016 ples for preparing PJSC Gazprom’s IFRS consolidated financial various objective factors. Contents 4 I II III IV V VI PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 Letter to Shareholders 65 by the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors and the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Management Committee Company Information 8 Company Information Strategy 32 Strategy Performance Results 50 Performance Results Environmental and Social Responsibility 100 Responsibility Corporate Governance 122 Corporate Governance Corporate Appendices 162 Appendices PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 Letter to Shareholders 6 by the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors and the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Management Committee Dear Shareholders, 2016 was a challenging year for the global energy industry, as it had a number of macro- economic factors applying pressure, including low prices of oil. Nevertheless, Gazprom demonstrated significant results in production during the reporting year, having met all its obligations in providing gas to both domestic and foreign consumers, and continuing the implementation of all crucial strategic investment projects. Major efforts were undertaken in Russia’s East: Construction was continued at the Chayandinskoye field, as well as at the Amur gas processing plant. The gas from the former is scheduled to be the first transported through the Power of Siberia gas pipeline — 445 kilo- metres of which were completed by the end of 2016. The new powerful engineering complex will ensure reliable gas supplies to the Russian Far East and the growing Chinese market. In the North of Russia, production at the largest field in the Yamal peninsula, Bovanenkov- skoye, was increased to 264 mmcm of gas per day at peak rates. With its immense potential, the peninsula is fast becoming Russia’s key gas production centre for many decades to come. Running in parallel with the development of the Company’s gas production facilities in Yamal, construction of the most advanced trunk gas pipelines was continued in Gazprom’s active expansion of the high-tech northern gas transmission corridor — the leading and most vital gas artery of Russia’s national Unified Gas Supply System. In the reporting year, construction of the most advanced trunk gas pipelines was contin- ued in this region: Bovanenkovo — Ukhta 2, and Ukhta — Torzhok 2, the Bovanenkovo — Ukhta 2 gas pipeline having been commissioned in January 2017. The northern corridor, specifically via the Nord Stream 2 future gas pipeline, is the shortest and most efficient route to supply gas from Yamal to consumers within both the European region of Russia, and North-Western Europe. The Nord Stream 2 project is being implemented as per schedule, and pipe shipments were launched during the reporting year. In February 2017, a contract was signed for offshore installation of both strings of the gas pipeline. The Turkish Stream export project targeting Turkey, Southern Europe, and South-Eastern Europe was resumed. In late 2016 to early 2017, contracts were signed for the construction of the first and second strings of the offshore section of the gas pipeline. New export trunk gas pipelines will considerably improve the reliability of Russian gas sup- plies to foreign consumers, and, consequently, the energy security of respective countries. PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 Letter to Shareholders by the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors 7 and the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Management Committee Every year, declining domestic gas production in Europe increases the demand for additional import gas volumes. In 2016, the European market demonstrated the highest demand for Russian gas in the entire history of its commercial supply, with Gazprom’s exports to far- abroad countries hitting a record level of 179.3 bcm. In the domestic market, Gazprom yet again accomplished the imperative task of ensuring reliable gas supplies to domestic consumers during the winter peak load period. To satisfy the characteristically sporadic daily consumption at the cusp of the autumn/winter season, the potential capacity of the Company’s underground gas storage facilities in Russia was raised to a new level of 801.3 mmcm per day. Gazprom continued expansion of the Russian gas infrastructure, its key social project. In the reporting year, the Company arranged for the connection of 25,400 households, and 175 boiler houses, with the gas infrastructure coverage of Russia’s territory reaching 67.2%. Gazprom consistently hones its competitive edge in the electricity and capacity markets. In 2016, two new modern power units were commissioned at the Troitskaya GRES and Novo- cherkasskaya GRES, with an aggregate capacity of 1 GW. Signifi cant achievements were made in the oil business: The Arctic Gate (“Vorota Arktiki”), Gazprom’s Arctic offshore oil loading terminal, was launched in the Ob Bay, thereby ensuring year-round tanker loadings with Yamal oil for further shipments via the Northern Sea Route. In the reporting year, Messoyakhaneftegaz, 50% of which is owned by PAO Gazprom Neft, launched Russia’s northernmost fi eld under development, named Vostochno-Mes- soyakhskoye. Adhering to the principles of sustainable development, Gazprom consistently minimised both its environmental and carbon footprints in 2016, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and implementing new energy-saving technologies. The Year of Occupational Health proved a success, achieving the lowest workplace injury rate over the past 17 years. Gazprom con- tinues these efforts with vigour in its aim to reduce the injury rate to zero. Dear Shareholders, the well-designed development strategy and its effective imple- mentation enabled Gazprom to meet its targets and maintain fi nancial stability. It can be taken into confi dence that the Company’s performance will remain at a prime level in future years. Viktor Zubkov Alexey Miller Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Chairman of PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors Management Committee PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 I Company Information 8 PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 Key Financial Results 109 The Group’s Business Model 11 and Position in the Global and Russian Energy Industry The Company’s History and Background 16 Operations and Marketing Geography 18 PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors 24 and Management Committee PJSC Gazprom’s Board of Directors 24 PJSC Gazprom’s Management Committee 27 Company Information PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 Key Financial Results 10 Stable dividend levels Positive free cash flow generated despite an unfavourable environment for the past 10 years PJSC Gazprom’s Dividends per dividend yield PJSC Gazprom’s share 5.2% RUB 8.0397* Net debt / adjusted EBITDA ratio Gazprom Group’s profit margin for the year for Gazprom Group attributable to owners of PJSC Gazprom 1. 5 16% Gazprom Group’s Gazprom Group’s profit for the year sales attributable to owners of PJSC Gazprom RUB 6,111.1 bn RUB 951.6 bn Gazprom Group’s Gazprom Group’s free cash flow capital investments RUB 202.2 bn RUB 1,344.2 bn For more details see the Financial Performance section. Pages 92–99. * The total recommended amount of dividends for 2016 payable in 2017 is RUB 190,327.4 mm. PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2016 The Group’s Business Model 11 and Position in the Global and Russian Energy Industry Gazprom Group encompasses all types of activities required Mission and strategic goal to ensure uninterrupted supply of energy to consumers. Its comprehensive vertically integrated business model PJSC Gazprom views its mission in reliable, efficient and complies with Gazprom’s strategic goal by enhancing per- balanced supply of natural gas, other energy resources and formance, improving reliability of supplies, and using the their derivatives to consumers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2009
    BOFIT BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2009 Bank of Finland, BOFIT Institute for Economies in Transition BOFIT Weekly Editor-in-Chief Seija Lainela Bank of Finland BOFIT – Institute for Economies in Transition PO Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 10 831 2268 Fax: +358 10 831 2294 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bof.fi/bofit The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank of Finland. BOFIT Weekly --- Russia 2009 1.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 1/2009 Rouble continues to weaken. Growth continued to fade in November. Economic development ministry scenarios see signifi-cantly slowing economy in coming year. Government identifies enterprises crucial to economic system. Four trillion roubles in financial sector support already released. 9.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 2/2009 Russian oil production in decline. Russia won’t openly commit to OPEC production cuts. Russia and Ukraine lock horns again on pricing of natural gas contracts and transmission fees. Stimulus legislation enters into force. 16.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 3/2009 Rouble’s decline continues after market reopens January 11. Current account surplus shrank substantially in 4Q08. Moscow stock exchanges post worst performance in a decade. Economic woes impairing banking sector growth. Inflation subsided towards the end of 2008. 23.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 4/2009 CBR announces new rouble policy. 2008 federal budget remained strongly in the black. Finance ministry alters this year’s federal budget. Changes in custom tariffs to support the economy. Government approves 2020 development plan. 30.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 5/2009 Russian central bank modifies exchange rate policy.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Download
    Julian Grinschgl FOKUS | 3/2019 Pipeline Politics, A Single Market, and the Rise of Renewable Energy: Challenges and Pathways for European Energy Security Introduction (CEE) are highly dependent on Russian The Pipeline Legacy gas supplies. Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, At the end of 2018, Gazprom reported Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, The collapse of the Soviet Union meant a record high in natural gas exports to Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Finland that the immense network of pipelines Europe, exceeding 200 billion cubic meters import more than 75% of their gas from linking the Siberian gas fields and Europe (bcm) for the first time.1 As of early January Russia.8 Furthermore, gas was used for as are now crossing numerous countries wit- 2019, the United States (US) ambassa- much as a quarter of total primary energy hout an overarching regulator. This creates dor to Germany threatened to sanction consumption in the EU and by looking at tensions between destination, transit, German companies that will continue broader and more long-term scenarios of and supplier countries due to problems to be engaged in the controversial Nord future energy demands it is expected that of governance because these pipelines Stream 2 (NS2) project, aiming to build the share of natural gas in the EU’s energy can be abused as a political tool. Ukra- another direct pipeline from Russia to mix might even further increase.9 The dec- ine, which has been the transit land for Germany circumventing transit states.2 line of domestic gas production in
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations
    Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations by Aliaksei Patonia Having ratified the Paris Agreement, the European Union (EU) pledged to substantially lower the level of its carbon emissions and become climate-neutral by 2050. In this respect, hydrogen (H2) – an energy source that could prospectively substitute conventional hydrocarbons – is viewed as an important element in achieving these ambitious targets, as it could revolutionize the energy industry. Here, though the EU puts specific attention to the build-up of H2 generation based on renewables, the cheapest way of its current large-scale production is using natural gas as a feedstock – the fuel imported primarily from Russia. This tradeoff between costs and climate commitments makes the future of the EU-Russia energy relations particularly tricky. EU’s Hydrogen Strategy vs. Russia’s ‘Hydrogen Roadmap’ Since energy production and consumption are the largest sources of CO2 emissions in the EU- 271, meeting the climate targets will necessitate a comprehensive transformation of the energy sector. Nevertheless, the energy industries in most European countries are still extensively reliant on hydrocarbons, in general (Figure 1), and natural gas, in particular, most of which is supplied by Russia. That is why, shifting the European economic paradigm towards sustainability is likely to necessitate the review of the EU-Russia energy relations, since Russia’s little focus on climate policy. 1 EEA (2013) 1 Figure 1: EU energy imports from Russia and energy mix2 Though, within the EU, reaching climate neutrality – i.e. the economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions – is generally viewed through decarbonization (the substitution of fossil fuels by renewables)3, the intermittency of wind and solar power necessitates finding a way to store large volumes of energy for a long time so that they could be integrated into the energy system4.
    [Show full text]
  • First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation I. Shuvalov Visits IIB’S Headquarters June 9, 2016
    Budapest, Fő utca 1, H-1011, Hungary Phone: : +36 1 727 8888 Fax: : +7 (499) 975-20-70 E-mail: [email protected] First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation I. Shuvalov visits IIB’s headquarters June 9, 2016 Yesterday, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Igor Shuvalov held a meeting with the members of the Board of the International Investment Bank (IIB) at the Bank’s headquarters in Moscow. Together they discussed IIB’s prospects and results of its reform launched in 2012 as well as the implementation of the most important projects with Russian participation. The renewed IIB is reoriented towards project finance with an emphasis on supporting small and medium-sized businesses, export-import operations and infrastructural projects. IIB’s Chairman, Nikolay Kosov, informed I. Shuvalov that “since the end of 2012, the Bank has signed investment agreements totalling almost EUR 640 million and has increased its assets by more than 100% while continuing to grow steadily. The IIB has expanded geographically by admitting Hungary as a new member and opening the first representative office in its history – European Regional Office in Bratislava”. Igor Shuvalov emphasized the Bank's successes over the past years, especially in relation to setting up a modern risk management system and expanding its portfolio of support provided to small and medium-sized businesses. Meeting with IIB’s management, the First Deputy Prime Minister called for the implementation of a strategy aiming to create an entirely new financial platform with new capacity and possibilities for entrepreneurs in the member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhenotdel, Russian Women and the Communist Party, 1919-1930
    RED ‘TEASPOONS OF CHARITY’: ZHENOTDEL, RUSSIAN WOMEN AND THE COMMUNIST PARTY, 1919-1930 by Michelle Jane Patterson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Michelle Jane Patterson 2011 Abstract “Red ‘Teaspoons of Charity’: Zhenotdel, the Communist Party and Russian Women, 1919-1930” Doctorate of Philosophy, 2011 Michelle Jane Patterson Department of History, University of Toronto After the Bolshevik assumption of power in 1917, the arguably much more difficult task of creating a revolutionary society began. In 1919, to ensure Russian women supported the Communist party, the Zhenotdel, or women’s department, was established. Its aim was propagating the Communist party’s message through local branches attached to party committees at every level of the hierarchy. This dissertation is an analysis of the Communist party’s Zhenotdel in Petrograd/ Leningrad during the 1920s. Most Western Zhenotdel histories were written in the pre-archival era, and this is the first study to extensively utilize material in the former Leningrad party archive, TsGAIPD SPb. Both the quality and quantity of Zhenotdel fonds is superior at St.Peterburg’s TsGAIPD SPb than Moscow’s RGASPI. While most scholars have used Moscow-centric journals like Kommunistka, Krest’ianka and Rabotnitsa, this study has thoroughly utilized the Leningrad Zhenotdel journal Rabotnitsa i krest’ianka and a rich and extensive collection of Zhenotdel questionnaires. Women’s speeches from Zhenotdel conferences, as well as factory and field reports, have also been folded into the dissertation’s five chapters on: organizational issues, the unemployed, housewives and prostitutes, peasants, and workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text
    www.ssoar.info The evolution of peasant economy in the industrial center of Russia at the end of the XIXth - beginning of the XXth century: (according to the Zemstvo statistical data) Ossokina, H.; Satarov, G. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Ossokina, H., & Satarov, G. (1991). The evolution of peasant economy in the industrial center of Russia at the end of the XIXth - beginning of the XXth century: (according to the Zemstvo statistical data). Historical Social Research, 16(2), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.16.1991.2.74-89 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-33259 Historical Social Research, Vol. 16 — 1991 — No. 2, 74-89 The Evolution of Peasant Economy in the Industrial Center of Russia at the End of the XlXth - Beginning of the XXth Century (According to the Zemstvo Statistical Data) H. Ossokina, G. Satarov* Abstract: The dispute on Russian agrarian capitalism is a century old. The authors' aim is to reveal and to ana• lyse the factors which determined the evolution of pea• sant economy in the Industrial Center on the turn of the century.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus: the Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law
    The North Caucasus: The Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law Europe Report N°226 | 6 September 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Russia between Decentralisation and the “Vertical of Power” ....................................... 3 A. Federative Relations Today ....................................................................................... 4 B. Local Government ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Funding and budgets ................................................................................................. 6 III. Elections ........................................................................................................................... 9 A. State Duma Elections 2011 ........................................................................................ 9 B. Presidential Elections 2012 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18
    October 2018 LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 OIES PAPER: NG137 Brian Songhurst Research Associate, OIES The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2018 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN: 978-1-78467-120-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671204 i LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Acknowledgements My thanks to fellow OIES colleague Claudio-Steuer for his contributions during the drafting of this paper. My thanks also to the following industry colleagues for their review and comments on the draft: Toby Chancellor-Weale, Chair, IChemE Oil and Natural Gas Special Interest Group (SONG) Chris Spilsbury, LNG Specialists Ltd John Rushbrook, Consultant ii LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Preface In his recent papers for OIES on the future of gas in Europe and the global energy economy, Jonathan Stern identified affordability as a key factor in determining whether gas would play a major role in Non-OECD countries. As the majority of traded gas will be LNG, the key question is therefore whether the cost of developing new liquefaction projects can be low enough to allow the gas to be competitive when it reaches the end consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP the Case of Russia
    Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP The Case of Russia V.D. Khizhniak St. Petersburg Publishing House of SPbSPU 2012 1 Khizhniak, Vladimir International Entrepreneurship: the Case of Russia. A manual for students. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbSPU, 2012. This manual is intended for students interested in international business. The theoretical concepts and practical issues of international entrepreneurship are considered with reference to Russia, one of the most promising sites for international business. ISBN © St. Petersburg State Plytechnical University, 2012 2 CONTENTS Chapter 1 General Characteristic of International Entrepreneurship 6 Chapter 2 The Russian Marketplace in a Global Context 24 Chapter 3 Business Environment and General Terms of Business 46 Chapter 4 Promotion of Foreign Investment 64 Chapter 5 Entrepreneurial Law and Commercial Disputes Resolution 84 Chapter 6 Setting up a Business Abroad 105 Chapter 7 Importing and Exporting 126 Chapter 8 Finance and Banking Environment 140 Chapter 9 Capital Markets and Securities 160 Chapter 10 Principal Taxes and Tax System 183 Chapter 11 Labor Hiring and Labor Relations 205 Chapter 12 International Marketing and Sales 216 Chapter 13 Business Risks and Insurance 241 Chapter 14 Business Culture 260 Bibliography 279 3 PREFACE This manual is developed for students of business colleges who seek to enhance their knowledge of international entrepreneurship. Experience has shown that processes of globalization and internationalization are developing so rapidly in recent years that even if students majoring in business does not intend to be involved in international business activity, they nevertheless will encounter problems relating to globalization and internationalization processes in their professional activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Macro-Politics: Political Pragmatism Or, Economic Necessity
    The National Projects December 2019 Population and GDP (2020E data) The long and winding road Population 146.8 GDP, Nominal, US$ bln $1,781 Plans are worthless. Planning is essential” GDP/Capita, US$ $12,132 Dwight D. Eisenhower GDP/Capita, PPP, US$ $27,147 Source: World Bank, World-o-Meters, MA The National Projects (NP) are at the core of the Russian government’s efforts to pull the economy out of the current slump, National Projects - Spending* to create sustainable diversified long-term growth and to improve Rub, Bln US$ Bln lifestyle conditions in Russia. It is the key element of President Putin’s Human Capital 5,729 $88 effort to establish his legacy. Health 1,726 $27 Education 785 $12 We are now initiating coverage of the National Projects strategy. We Demographics 3,105 $48 will provide regular detailed updates about the progress in each of Culture 114 $2 the major project sectors, focusing especially on the opportunities Quality of Life 9,887 $152 Safer Roads 4,780 $74 for foreign investors and on the mechanisms for them to take part. Housing 1,066 $16 ▪ What is it? A US$390 billion program of public spending, designed Ecology 4,041 $62 to stimulate investment, build infrastructure and improve health Economic Growth 10,109 $156 and well-being by 2024, i.e. the end of the current presidential Science 636 $10 Small Business Development 482 $7 term. Digital Economy 1,635 $25 ▪ Is this a return to Soviet-style planning? For some of the NPs, Labour productivity 52 $1 Export Support 957 $15 especially those involving infrastructure, it certainly looks like it.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Otkhodnichestvo's Impact on Small Towns in Russia
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Zausaeva, Yana Conference Paper Otkhodnichestvo's impact on small towns in Russia 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Zausaeva, Yana (2014) : Otkhodnichestvo's impact on small towns in Russia, 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124426 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen)
    [Show full text]