Update on the Uk Government's Work Programme Pdf 77 Kb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update on the Uk Government's Work Programme Pdf 77 Kb ARGYLL & BUTE COUNCIL Economy PPG DEVELOPMENT& INFRASTRUCTURE 23rd November 2010 UPDATE ON THE UK GOVERNMENT’S WORK PROGRAMME 1. Summary This report provides an update to the paper presented at the Economy PPG meeting on 25 th August 2010 with a particular focus on the preparation work undertake by the Argyll and Bute Employability Team in light of the introduction of the UK Government’s Work Programme in early 2011. 2. Recommendation 2.1 This report is for noting. 3. Argyll and Bute Employability Team Activities 3.1 It is known that only one Prime Contractor will cover the whole of Scotland with between smaller geographical ‘arrangements’ to be established. The Employability Team Manager has had detailed one-to-one discussions with six organisations (Working Links, The Wise Group, Ingeus, A4E, JHP Training and SERCO) that could potential become the Prime Contractor. The positive outcomes further to these meetings are detailed below. 3.2 Working Links This took the form of an update on the position the Employability Team was at with regard to the previous Flexible New Deal programme and was a matter of confirmation that the Employability Team was still prepared to take on the role of a ‘super’ sub-contractor (through service level agreements) on behalf of Working Links and delivery the new Work Programme throughout the Highlands, Islands, Clyde Coast and Grampian (HICC&G) area. 3.3 The Wise Group The Employability Team Manager was invited to meet with Laurie Russell (Managing Director) in their offices in Glasgow to discuss what areas the Argyll and Bute Team would be comfortable in taking on as a delivery area. It was intimated that the whole of HICC&G is important for the Employability Team as this provides sufficient customer numbers to make delivery viable. Therefore, it was agreed that should The Wise Group be successful at the tender stage, the Argyll and Bute Employability Team would have the opportunity to take on the delivery of the Work Programme across the HICC&G area. 3.4 Ingeus Louise Chisholm (Business Development Manager) from Ingeus met with the Employability Team Manager in Campbeltown and expressed an interest in the team taking on a similar area to that discussed with other prospective ‘Primes’. Louise stated that following that meeting she would be recommending that the Argyll and Bute Employability Team would deliver the Work Programme, on their behalf, for the whole of HICC&G. 1 3.5 A4E The Employability Team Manager has met with A4E on several occasions over the past few months. Geraldine Muir their Business Development Manager has visited the team’s premises in Oban and was very impressed with the range of options on offer to the customer groups. Likewise, if successful in securing the tender, A4E has asked if the Argyll and Bute Employability Team would be prepared to take on the HICC&G area on their behalf. The significant difference between the approach of A4E and the others, so far, has been that they are bringing all their prospective ‘partners’ together for two meetings to discuss both the delivery model for the new Work Programme and any possible funding model. 1 This is a real departure for such a large company, as it is usually the case that such an organisation, if successful, would ask a smaller organisation to deliver and then dictate how, when and for how much. 3.6 JHP Training JHP Training already holds the contract for the Jobcentre Plus Support Contract (JCPSC) in both the north and south of Scotland. On this basis they would appear to be a favourable position in terms of tendering for the new Work Programme contract. However, there have been some difficulties with their handling of this contract. That aside, JHP Training would like the Argyll and Bute Employability Team to deliver the Work Programme on their behalf across the Highlands and Islands, the same area the team currently delivers the JCPSC. There is a possibility that the geographical area of delivery could be extended. Meetings have taken place with their representatives on this matter. 3.7 SERCO John Lynch from SERCO (based in London) visited the Employability Team’s operations in Campbeltown. He spent the day with the team and was very impressed with the Employability Team’s delivery model and expressed that SERCO would want the team to deliver on their behalf across HICC&G area. 4. Other Areas of Interest 4.1 Over and above these, often intense, meetings there have also been expressions of interest lodged with several other prospective ‘Primes’ who have managed to get themselves onto the new ‘Framework’ (i.e. the method of entering the first phase of the new tendering process for Welfare to Work provision). Although some 26 companies have lodged an interest in being on the ‘Framework’ it would appear that only 11 or 12 of them would realistically be interested in tendering for Welfare to Work services. These have all been approached by the Argyll and Bute Employability Team Manager. 4.2 There is now a period of waiting, with one or two meetings still to be held, until the actual Contract Package areas are announced later in November. This will then inform who will or will not be tendering for our area. It is speculated that there will be two Package Areas in Scotland, the north and the south, however this has yet to be confirmed. This would indicate that all those organisations already spoken to, plus potentially some others, will tender for the north and the Argyll and Bute Employability Team may have to enter into further negotiations with other organisations. 1 Both meetings will have taken place by the 23 rd November and a verbal update will be provided at the EPPG meeting. 2 4.3 It would appear that the new Work Programme will absorb all previous contract areas and will include those customers currently on Incapacity Benefit, Lone Parents, those with physical and mental health issues and all other eligible individuals who are in receipt of any out of work benefit. This will create a challenging environment for the Employability Team to work in and will require an element of re-training for some of the existing staff. All of these issues are being taken into consideration at this time in the planning for the introduction of this new programme. 4.4 The Employability Team currently has a well established ‘Supply Chain’ throughout the Highlands and Islands involved with the delivery of the Jobcentre Plus Support Contract. During recent months several other smaller specialist providers have requested that they become part of this chain. This is encouraging and indicates that the team continues to be held with high regard in Welfare to Work circles. Discussions are also underway with The Highland Council with a view that this local authority will join the ‘Supply Chain’. 5. Conclusion 5.1 Although the Argyll and Bute Employability Team’s involvement in the delivery of the new Work Programme is still unclear at this time, the team is confident that sufficient funding, as a ‘super’ sub-contractor (through service level agreements) will be achieved to enable much of the current delivery model to survive the changes proposed to the system. For further information and clarification please contact : Ishabel Bremner, Economic Development Manager, tel: 01546 604375 or Ray McIntosh-Walley, Employability Team Manager, tel: 01586 551389 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision Notice
    FS50441818 Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice Date: 1 October 2012 Public Authority: Department for Work and Pensions Address: IGS Directorate The Adelphi 1-11 John Adam Street London WC2N 6HT Decision (including any steps ordered) 1. The complainant asked the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for the names of the organisations that JHP Group use when delivering Mandatory Work Activity in the Scotland Contract Package Area (CPA). 2. The Commissioner’s decision is that by withholding the information under sections 43(2) and 36(2)(c) the DWP did not deal with the request for information in accordance with the FOIA. 3. By failing to state or explain in its refusal notice that section 36(2)(c) was applicable to the requested information the department breached sections 17(1)(b) and (c) of the FOIA. 4. The Commissioner requires the department to disclose the information within 35 calendar days of the date of this decision notice. 5. Failure to comply may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court pursuant to section 54 of the FOIA and may be dealt with as a contempt of court. FS50441818 Request and response 6. On 11 January 2012 the complainant requested the following information: “Please could you provide me with the names and locations of organisations which are participating in the Work Programme in the Scotland Contract Package Area, by providing mandatory work placements through the DWP’s prime providers Ingeus, and Working Links, through JHP Group Ltd or any relevant sub-contractors.” 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigel Lawrence [email protected] DWP Central Freedom of Information Team Caxton House 6-12 Tothill Stre
    DWP Central Freedom of Information Team Caxton House 6-12 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NA Nigel Lawrence freedom-of-information- [email protected] [email protected] DWP Website Our Ref: FOI2020/69472 7 December 2020 Dear Nigel Lawrence, Thank you for your Freedom of Information (FoI) request received on 12 November. You asked for: “Please provide a list of all private sector organisations to which DWP has awarded a contract to purchases services in connection with the provision of any interventions designed to help claimants to enter the labour market. My request includes, but is not limited to, employability courses and individual employment advice including tailored assistance with completing employment applications.” DWP Response I can confirm that the Department holds the information you are seeking for contracts awarded since 2009. Since 2009 DWP Employment Category has awarded contracts for interventions designed to help claimants enter the labour market to the following providers. 15billion 3SC A4e Ltd Aberdeen Foyer Access to Industry Acorn Training Advance Housing & Support Ltd ADVANCED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT GROUP (UK) LIMITED Adviza Partnership Amacus Ltd Apex Scotland APM UK Ltd Atos IT Services UK Limited Autism Alliance UK Babington Business College Barnardo's 1 Best Practice Training & Development Ltd Burnley Telematics and Teleworking Limited Business Sense Associates C & K Careers Ltd Campbell Page Capital Engineering Group Holdings Capital Training Group Careers Development Group CDG-WISE Ability
    [Show full text]
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Maddock, Su Working Paper A MIOIR case study on public procurement and innovation: DWP work programme procurement - Delivering innovation for efficiencies or for claimants? Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 629 Provided in Cooperation with: Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester Suggested Citation: Maddock, Su (2012) : A MIOIR case study on public procurement and innovation: DWP work programme procurement - Delivering innovation for efficiencies or for claimants?, Manchester Business School Working Paper, No. 629, The University of Manchester, Manchester Business School, Manchester This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102375 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur
    [Show full text]
  • Foi Blog Site
    DWP Central Freedom of InformationAnnex ATeam e-mail: [email protected] Our Ref: FOI 699 01 March 2012 Annex A Dear Mr Smith, Thank you for your Freedom of Information request which we received on 16 February 2012. In that request, you asked: Please could you provide a list of organisations signed up to provide unpaid work placements under the Mandatory Work Activity and Mandatory Work Programme schemes as referred by Jobcentre Plus, and the name of the linked providers in the Poole and Bournemouth area. The information you have requested is being withheld under Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, this exemption relates to the commercial interests of the Department for Work and Pensions and any other company or organisation delivering services on our behalf. I consider that the exemption applies because disclosure could, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of companies providing work-experience placements and the ability of the Department and its contracted providers to work in partnership with these companies to secure such opportunities. In line with the Department’s transparency commitments, we have previously provided information about companies who participate in a number of our programmes that offer work experience, where we can collect this information without disproportionate cost. However, we are now invoking the exemption because it has become clear in recent weeks that there are a minority of people who appear to be seeking to undermine the goodwill of employers who are prepared to offer opportunities to unemployed people by attempting to harm those companies’ commercial interests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Micro-Econometric Evaluation of the UK Work Programme
    'I, Daniel Blake' revisited: A micro-econometric evaluation of the UK Work Programme Danula K. Gamage∗ Pedro S. Martinsy Queen Mary University of London Queen Mary University of London CRED & NovaSBE & IZA June 19, 2017 Work in Progress Abstract Although many countries are making greater use of public-private partnerships in em- ployment services, there are few detailed econometric analysis of their effects, in contrast to a large body of small-sample or qualitative case studies. This paper contributes to this literature by examining the case of the UK Work Programme, drawing on popula- tion data of all nearly two-million participants between 2011 and 2016. We also exploit the original structure of the programme to disentangle the impact of different provider and jobseeker characteristics from business cycle, cohort, regional and time-in-programme effects. Moreover, we consider both transitions to employment and transitions out of unemployment. Our main results indicate considerable differences in performance across providers and across jobseeker profiles. The latter results suggest that, by changing the incentive structure offered to providers, the government could obtain better results at the same cost. Keywords: Public employment services, job search, public policy evaluation. JEL Codes: J64, J68, J22. ∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], Address: School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. yEmail: [email protected]. Address: School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. Web: http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/pmartins 1 1 Introduction Focusing on the individual case of a fictional elderly widower, the award-winning film 'I, Daniel Blake' portraits a negative facade of UK welfare-to-work programmes over the last years.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme Supply Chains
    Work Programme Supply Chains The information contained in the table below reflects updates and changes to the Work Programme supply chains and is correct as at 30 September 2013. It is published in the interests of transparency. It is limited to those in supply chains delivering to prime providers as part of their tier 1 and 2 chains. Definitions of what these tiers incorporate vary from prime provider to prime provider. There are additional suppliers beyond these tiers who are largely to be called on to deliver one off, unique interventions in response to a particular participants needs and circumstances. The Department for Work and Pensions fully anticipate that supply chains will be dynamic, with scope to flex and evolve to reflect change within the labour market and participant needs. The Department intends to update this information at regular intervals (generally every 6 months) dependant on time and resources available. In addition to the Merlin standard, a robust process is in place for the Department to approve any supply chain changes and to ensure that the service on offer is not compromised or reduced. Comparison between the corrected March 2013 stock take and the September 2013 figures shows a net increase in the overall number of organisations in the supply chains across all sectors. The table below illustrates these changes Sector Number of organisations in the supply chain Private At 30 September 2013 - 367 compared to 351 at 31 March 2013 Public At 30 September 2013 - 128 compared to 124 at 30 March 2013 Voluntary or Community (VCS) At 30 September 2013 - 363 compared to 355 at 30 March 2013 Totals At 30 September 2013 - 858 organisations compared to 830 at March 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work Programme: Factors Associated with Differences in the Relative Effectiveness of Prime Providers
    The Work Programme: factors associated with differences in the relative effectiveness of prime providers August 2016 The Work Programme: factors associated with differences in the relative effectiveness of prime providers DWP ad hoc research report no. 26 A report of research carried out by NIESR on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions. © Crown copyright 2016. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU,or email: [email protected]. This document/publication is also available on our website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/research-reports If you would like to know more about DWP research, please email: [email protected] First published 2016. ISBN 978-1-78425-617-3 Views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Department for Work and Pensions or any other Government Department The Work Programme: factors associated with differences in the relative effectiveness of prime providers Summary The Work Programme is delivered by 18 private, public and voluntary sector organisations, working under contract to DWP. These organisations are known as prime providers, or "primes", and operate within a geographical Contract Package Area (CPA). Each CPA has either two or three primes and individuals entering the Work Programme are randomly assigned to one of these. Comparing the outcomes of individuals assigned to each prime within a CPA provides robust estimates of relative effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Magazine for Free
    editorial Corporate It has almost become a self-evident truth that unemployment has been growing progressively over the last two decades, both in scale and in its significance for social and economic policy. How and why are often ignored but a vast Watch industry to ‘manage’ this ‘crisis’ has developed. From flourishing private companies, such as A4e, contracted by the Department for Work and Pensions to deliver what Jobcentre Plus has apparently failed to achieve, through tens of Newsletter 45/46: subcontracted employment services providers, to a growing sector of so-called Winter 2009/2010 voluntary organisations that depend on this reserve army of unemployed people to source their ‘slave’ workforce. This double issue of the Corporate Watch Corporate Watch is an independent not-for- Newsletter takes a look at this relatively new ‘unemployment business’; its profit research group, which aims to expose protagonists, ideological, political and economic premises and how it is being how large corporations function, and the utilised by the New Labour government to dismantle what’s left of the welfare detrimental effects they have on society state. and the environment as an inevitable result of their current legal structure. Corporate The ‘unemployment crisis’ has certainly been exacerbated by the recent Watch strives for a society that is ecologically economic downturn, with many employers going bust, but that’s not the whole sustainable, democratic, equitable and story. Many big businesses have also exploited the current climate to push non-exploitative. Progress towards such a for compulsory redundancies. More importantly, the recession and the rising society may, in part, be achieved through number of jobless people have been skilfully employed by politicians and dismantling the vast economic and political government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme Evaluation: Findings from the First Phase of Qualitative
    Research report Work Programme evaluation: Findings from the first phase of qualitative research on programme delivery by Becci Newton, Nigel Meager, Christine Bertram, Anne Corden, Anitha George, Mumtaz Lalani, Hilary Metcalf, Heather Rolfe, Roy Sainsbury and Katharine Weston Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 821 Work Programme evaluation: Findings from the first phase of qualitative research on programme delivery Becci Newton, Nigel Meager, Christine Bertram, Anne Corden, Anitha George, Mumtaz Lalani, Hilary Metcalf, Heather Rolfe, Roy Sainsbury and Katharine Weston A report of research carried out by the Institute for Employment Studies, the Social Policy Research Unit at the University of York and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions © Crown copyright 2012. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. This document/publication is also available on our website at: http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrs-index.asp Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Central Analysis Division, Department for Work and Pensions, Upper Ground Floor, Steel City House, West Street, Sheffield, S1 2GQ First published 2012. ISBN 978 1 909532 01 4 Views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Department for Work and Pensions or any other Government Department.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Voluntary Sector Services Working
    PERFECT PARTNERS strengthening relationships within employment services supply chains. A Good Practice Guide by ERSA, ACEVO and NCVO PERFECT PARTNERS: A Good Practice Guide by ERSA, ACEVO and NCVO Published July 2012 CONTENTS. p4. Joint foreword from ERSA, ACEVO and NCVO p6. Introduction p12. Case studies: establishing supply chains p16. Case studies: managing supply chains p21. Recommendations checklist 3 JOINT FOREWORD. FROM ERSA, ACEVO AND NCVO There is a proud tradition of voluntary sector organisations supporting people into employment. Alongside public sector agencies and private provision, charities have worked to help people gain and sustain jobs, with many specialising in helping those furthest from the labour market. The recent direction of public service reform has led to a new challenging dynamic for all sectors participating in employment related services, but this is particularly the case for charities operating within the welfare to work sector. First, the adoption of the ‘prime contractor’ model for government commissioned employment related services means that fewer organisations now have a relationship directly with the commissioner. Secondly, the trend towards ‘payment by results’ has meant that only organisations of a certain size and disposition have felt able to consider acting as a prime contractor of employment related services. The result is that, in today’s world of welfare to work, the majority of voluntary sector organisations delivering publicly commissioned employment related services do so in a subcontractor capacity to a prime contractor. The challenges of this arrangement have been becoming apparent. This is why ERSA, ACEVO and NCVO are working together to encourage and support good quality relationships within supply chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review
    ERSA board: ERSA outside Westminster ERSA Services ERSA Events April 2016 – April 2017 Steve Swan (Chair) Business Director – Tomorrow’s People Annual Review Alex Stevenson (Vice Chair) ERSA offers a wide range of services to its ERSA members have access to wide range Chief Operating Officer – G4S Employment Support Services members including: of high profile events, in 2015/2016 these 2016 included: Brian Bell Managing Director, Employability & international – • Access to member only networking and Working Links influencing events on distinct topics and themes. • The ERSA AGM which in 2016 is featuring Elizabeth Taylor Fraser Nelson, Editor of the Spectator and Chief Executive – • Weekly ERSA e-bulletin featuring all the latest columnist for The Daily Telegraph. Bootstrap Enterprises sector news. Helen Cameron • The ERSA Awards addressed by the Minister Head of Public Affairs – The Salvation Army Employment Plus • A weekly parliamentary monitoring service. for Employment and attended by the Shadow Employment Minister. Iain Salisbury • A free legal helpline staffed by legal sector Chief Operating Officer – Learndirect specialists, Bircham Dyson Bell. • The ERSA Annual Conference, attended by around 300 people, which heard from a range of Liz Armstrong • Price reductions for key products and services, high profile speakers, including the Employment Director of Health, Wellbeing and Integrated Services – APM including the entitledto off benefit calculator. Minister, Rt Hon Priti Patel MP. Rod Jackson Managing Director – Employment Support Scotland • Access to the ERSA Opportunities Hub and • The ‘Leading from the Front’ specialist PeoplePlus the ability to advertise products and services at conference on disabilities and health issues, Launched in 2015, Employment Support Scotland brings together a network of 54 Zoe Eccles organisations to support ERSA’s work with the Scottish Government on the future of reduced rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme Last Updated: 12 June 2018 (Version 5.0)
    Work Programme Last updated: 12 June 2018 (version 5.0) Contents At a Glance – Work Programme Introduction Change of circumstances Mandatory referrals Optional referrals / mandatory participation Voluntary referrals / voluntary participation Claimant working for 26 weeks or more and treated as an early completer Work Programme completers Light Touch regime At a Glance – Work Programme The Work Programme (WP) gives up to two years of extra support to claimants who need more help in finding and staying in work. The WP provider decides how best to support claimants referred to them, through a ‘black box' approach. The last date for referrals to the WP was 31st March 2017. All claimants referred on or before this date will remain on the WP for up to 104 weeks even if they move into work, unless they complete the WP early. Claimants were referred to the WP at different points in their Universal Credit claim. A referral could either be mandatory or voluntary. Some voluntary referrals resulted in the claimant having to participate on a mandatory basis. A change in a claimant’s circumstances can result in changes to the nature of participation on the WP and to their agreed commitments. Additional support is provided to claimants in the Intensive Work Search regime when they complete the Work Programme. Introduction The WP provides up to two years of extra support to claimants who need more help in finding and staying in work. The WP providers decide how best to support claimants referred to them, through a ‘black box' approach. The claimant’s Commitment provided the foundation for referral to the WP and claimants were issued with a new Commitment as part of the referral process.
    [Show full text]