A Core Subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 Is Broadly Conserved In
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
A core subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 1 is PNAS PLUS broadly conserved in function but not primary sequence Leslie Y. Beha,1, Lucy J. Colwellb,c, and Nicole J. Francisa,2 aDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;bApplied Mathematics, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; andcMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom Edited by Jerry L. Workman, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, and accepted by the Editorial Board February 3, 2012 (received for review November 15, 2011) Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins mediate heritable gene silencing by (9), as reflected by sequence alignments of the SET domain in modifying chromatin structure. An essential PcG complex, PRC1, diverse genomes (10). Another PcG complex, Polycomb Repres- compacts chromatin and inhibits chromatin remodeling. In Droso- sive Complex 1 (PRC1), consists of four “core” subunits: RING, phila melanogaster, the intrinsically disordered C-terminal region Posterior sex combs (PSC), Polycomb (PC), and Polyhomeotic of PSC (PSC-CTR) mediates these noncovalent effects on chromatin, (PH), all of which are essential in Drosophila (11, 12). Several and is essential for viability. Because the PSC-CTR sequence is in vitro activities have been described for PRC1, all of which en- poorly conserved, the significance of its effects on chromatin out- tail the noncovalent modification of chromatin structure. These side of Drosophila was unclear. The absence of folded domains include chromatin compaction (13), inhibition of chromatin re- modeling (14), and repression of transcription from DNA and also made it difficult to understand how the sequence of PSC-CTR — encodes its function. To determine the mechanistic basis and extent chromatin templates in vitro (14). Two PRC1 subunits RING and PSC—are also present in a distinct complex, dRAF, which of conservation of PSC-CTR activity, we identified 17 metazoan functions as an E3 ligase to stimulate the covalent modification PSC-CTRs spanning chordates to arthropods, and examined their of chromatin through H2A ubiquitination (15). sequence features and biochemical properties. PSC-CTR sequences The PRC1 subunit PSC is sufficient for its noncovalent effects are poorly conserved, but are all highly charged and structurally on chromatin structure (11, 13, 16). PSC is a large protein with a — disordered. We show that active PSC-CTRs which bind DNA conserved motif near its N terminus containing a RING and tightly and inhibit chromatin remodeling efficiently—are distin- RAWUL domain (17–19). This region is important for assembly guished from less active ones by the absence of extended nega- of PSC into PRC1 and likely its activity in Polycomb complexes tively charged stretches. PSC-CTR activity can be increased by (17, 20). The C-terminal region (CTR) of the protein is necessary dispersing its contiguous negative charge, confirming the impor- and sufficient for PSC effects on chromatin structure. Nonsense tance of this property. Using the sequence properties defined as mutations that encode truncations of most of the CTR are severe important for PSC-CTR activity, we predicted the presence of active hypomorphs, and disrupt PcG-dependent gene silencing in vivo PSC-CTRs in additional diverse genomes. Our analysis reveals broad (16, 21). The truncated proteins also lack PSC’s effects on conservation of PSC-CTR activity across metazoans. This conclusion chromatin in vitro, indicating that these biochemical activities are BIOCHEMISTRY could not have been determined from sequence alignments. We central to its biological function. further find that plants that lack active PSC-CTRs instead possess The primary sequence of PSC-CTR is poorly conserved even a functionally analogous PcG protein, EMF1. Thus, our study sug- within the dipterans (20), rendering it difficult to identify con- gests that a disordered domain with dispersed negative charges served sequence features that encode its biochemical activities. — underlies PRC1 activity, and is conserved across metazoans and In addition, a paralogue of PSC in Drosophila melanogaster — plants. Suppressor 2 of zeste [Su(z)2] has a CTR of similar biochemical function to PSC-CTR, even though their primary sequences are intrinsically disordered protein ∣ protein evolution poorly conserved, according to Lo et al. (20). Su(z)2 shares high sequence similarity with PSC only in the N-terminal domain (20, 22, 23). The CTRs of PSC and Su(z)2 share unusual amino acid egulation of chromatin structure occurs through covalent compositions, and are both predicted to be disordered, leading Rmodification of histone proteins, and noncovalent effects on to the hypothesis that these properties underlie their conserved chromatin structure and folding (1, 2). Chromatin modifying en- activity. The poor sequence conservation of the PSC-CTR has zymes add or remove posttranslational modifications of histone also made it difficult to determine the extent of its evolutionary proteins through structured domains, which are readily identified conservation beyond Drosophila (20). through sequence alignments and predicted structure compari- To determine essential sequence properties encoding PSC- sons. On the other hand, proteins that alter chromatin folding CTR activity, and to assess the extent of its evolutionary conser- and compaction frequently use intrinsically disordered regions. vation, we identified 17 metazoan PSC-CTRs and compared their These domains tend to evolve more rapidly, making it difficult to sequences and biochemical activities. We find that biochemically track their activity across evolution using sequence alignments (1). active PSC-CTRs are present in widely diverged species despite An essential set of chromatin-based regulators are the Poly- comb Group (PcG) proteins, which mediate heritable gene silen- cing through the modification of chromatin structure (2). They Author contributions: L.Y.B., L.J.C., and N.J.F. designed research; L.Y.B. and L.J.C. performed have been implicated in a wide variety of biological processes, research; L.Y.B. and L.J.C. analyzed data; and L.Y.B., L.J.C., and N.J.F. wrote the paper. ranging from genome imprinting (3), cell cycle regulation (4), The authors declare no conflict of interest. mammalian X-chromosome inactivation (5), and the mainte- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. J.L.W. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial nance of stem cell identity (6). PcG proteins are also misregulated Board. in cancer and contribute to cancer progression (7). PcG proteins 1Present address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, assemble into multiprotein complexes, with different biochemical NJ 08544 activities toward chromatin (2). One PcG complex, PRC2, methy- 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. lates histone H3 on lysine 27 through the SET domain of one of See Author Summary on page 6798 (volume 109, number 18). its subunits, Enhancer of Zeste [E(Z)] (8). PRC2 and its enzy- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ matic activity are clearly conserved across metazoans and plants doi:10.1073/pnas.1118678109/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1118678109 PNAS ∣ Published online April 18, 2012 ∣ E1063–E1071 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 the lack of sequence similarity, indicating they are broadly con- Fig. S1B). Importantly, they did not alter the level of background served in function but not primary sequence. We identified restriction enzyme digestion by HhaI when incubated with chro- sequence properties shared by active PSC-CTRs, which bind matin template in the absence of chromatin remodeler (compare DNA tightly and inhibit chromatin remodeling efficiently. Impor- first and second lanes in Fig. S1B). This indicates that chromatin tantly, we determined that the presence of extended contiguous remodeling, and not restriction enzyme digestion, is specifically negative charge impairs PSC-CTR activity. Our work illustrates inhibited. The 15 PSC-CTRs that bound DNA most tightly also the importance of using empirical measurements, rather than inhibited chromatin remodeling with high efficiency, with 50% sequence alignments, to assess the functional properties of inhibition points from 1 to 7 nM. In contrast, D. pulex PSC1- PSC-like proteins. The mechanistic and evolutionary features CTR and PSC2-CTR required concentrations of 34 nM and of PSC-CTR uncovered in this study may be generally relevant 159 nM, respectively, to achieve 50% inhibition of remodeling, to chromatin-binding proteins, which commonly possess similar corresponding to an approximately 17 and approximately intrinsically disordered regions (24). 80-fold lower efficiency than D. melanogaster PSC-CTR. A mod- est correlation was observed between the affinity for DNA and Results the efficiency of inhibition of chromatin remodeling among Large, Intrinsically Disordered PSC-CTRs Are Present in a Wide Sam- repressive PSC-CTRs (r ¼ 0.532, P ¼ 0.041). Intuitively, this pling of Invertebrate Taxa. To assess the conservation of PSC-CTR correlation is expected since chromatin binding is likely mediated sequence and function, we assembled a comprehensive set of at least in part by DNA binding, and must be important for in- PSC-CTRs by querying 30 diverse metazoan and plant genomes hibition of chromatin remodeling. However, the weak correlation