DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads … Freight Railroads in Massachusetts Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................14 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................1,000 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................604 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$107,970 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................3,600 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$95 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 852,000 additional trucks to handle the 15.3 million tons of freight that moved by rail in Massachusetts in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 3.5 million Total Carloads: 93,300 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Waste and Scrap 1.9 21,000 Intermodal 0.9 64,900 Glass and Stone 0.4 3,500 Chemicals 0.2 1,600 Other 0.2 2,400 Source: AAR analysis of industry data 4% (% based on tonnage) Rail Traffic Terminated in 2019 Total Tons: 8.7 million Total Carloads: 235,800 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Intermodal 1.8 133,700 Food Products 1.3 13,300 Chemicals 1.2 12,300 Pulp and Paper 1.0 12,500 Intermodal Lumber, Wood Products 0.9 10,200 21% Other 2.5 53,900 Other Source: AAR analysis of industry data 29% (% based on tonnage) © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021 Freight Railroads in Massachusetts Miles Operated In Massachusetts Miles Operated Massachusetts in 2019 2019 Totals Number Excluding Including Class I Railroads of Freight Trackage Trackage CSX Transportation 400 Railroads Rights Rights 400 Regional Railroads Class I 1 239 400 New England Central Railroad 60 Regional 4 546 577 Pan Am Railways 219 Short Line 9 215 215 Pan Am Southern 188 Total 14 1,000 1,192 Providence and Worcester Railroad 110 577 Short Line Railroads Bay Colony Railroad 10 Connecticut Southern Railroad 7 East Brookfield & Spencer Railroad 4 Fore River Transportation Corp. 3 Grafton & Upton Railroad 16 Housatonic Railroad 38 Massachusetts Central Railroad 25 Massachusetts Coastal Railroad 95 Pioneer Valley Railroad 17 215 Amtrak KCS BNSF NS CN UP CP Short Line/Regional CSX Multiple Owners Map is based on the 2020 National Transportation Atlas Database published by the U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Some mileage figures are AAR estimates. Class I Railroad: A railroad with 2019 operating revenues of at least $504.8 million. Regional Railroad: A non-Class I line-haul railroad that has annual revenues of at least $40 million, or that operates at least 350 miles of road and revenues of at least $20 million. Short Line Railroad: A railroad which is neither a Class I nor a Regional Railroad. © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014
    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
    [Show full text]
  • Tec Associates 46 Sawyer Street South Portland, Maine 04106 Table of Contents
    VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR: Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) Grafton and Upton Railroad Company Housatonic Railroad Company Massachusetts Central Railroad Corporation Massachusetts Coastal Railroad New England Central Railroad Providence and Worcester Railroad Company For railroad rights-of-way in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1 JANUARY 2021 – 31 DECEMBER 2025 PREPARED BY: TEC ASSOCIATES 46 SAWYER STREET SOUTH PORTLAND, MAINE 04106 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF RAILROADS COVERED BY THIS PLAN 1 A. Railroads Operating Under This Plan 1 B. Variations from Basic Plan 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. GENERAL STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3 IV. INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 6 V. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY 8 A. Roadbed 9 B. Bridges 10 C. Culverts 10 D. Ditches 10 E. ROW Area Adjacent to the Shoulder 10 1. At-Grade (Level) Road Crossings 10 2. Railroad Signals and Switch Boxes 10 3. Inside Curves 10 F. Railroad Yards and Facilities 11 VI. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES 11 A. Mechanical Techniques 12 B. Herbicide Application 12 1. Weed Control 13 a. Preemergence Herbicide Program 14 b. Postemergence Herbicide Program 15 2. Brush Control 15 a. Foliar 15 b. Stem 15 c. Cut surface 16 3. Summation 16 C. Indirect Methods 16 VII. SENSITIVE AREAS 17 A. Identification and Location of Wells and Surface Water Supplies 18 B. Identification and Delineation of Wetlands 18 C. Field Procedure 20 1. Preparation 20 2. Boundary Establishment 20 3. Approval of Findings 20 D. Operational Strategies and Procedures 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS VIII. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATORS RELATIVE TO HERBICIDE USE 24 A.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Freight Movement
    2012 Regional Transportation Plan Freight Movements Montachusett MPO Freight Movements Chapter 8 – Freight Movements FREIGHT MOVEMENTS Introduction An efficient and cost effective system that allows for the movement of freight and services is essential to the economic vitality of the Montachusett Region and Massachusetts. All aspects or components of a transportation network work together in the delivery of these goods. From rail and highways to airports and seaports, maintaining these systems to insure an effective and efficient network produces benefits that often reach beyond the borders of a region and a state. The Commonwealth has developed the Massachusetts Freight Rail Plan (September 2010) which “provides a comprehensive evaluation of the Commonwealth’s freight transportation system, its operations, and its effect on economic development and quality of life.” This chapter will review freight and goods movement from the overall state perspective though the Freight Plan as it relates to the Montachusett Region as well as an examination of regional issues and concerns. The Freight and Rail Plan can be found at the following website: www.massfreightandrailplan.com. Massachusetts Freight Plan The Massachusetts Freight Plan was completed in September 2010 and encompasses all modes of freight within the Commonwealth. A multi disciplined consultant team, examined conditions, issues, policies and impacts to and associated with the economic development and quality of life for the state. Statewide Goals Within the context of MassDOT policies
    [Show full text]
  • Trains 2019 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov
    [Show full text]
  • 301796 ENTERED Office of Proceedings March 22, 2021 Part Of
    ~ capital 301796 The Honorable Martin J. Oberman Chairman Surface Transportation Board ENTERED 395 E. Street SW Office of Proceedings Washington, DC 20423 March 22, 2021 202-245-0245 Part of [email protected] Public Record 20 March 2021 Dear Chairman Oberman, I am writing this paper to present an alternative operating plan with reference to the purchase of the Pan Am Railways by the CSX Railroad which was filed to the Surface Transportation Board dated 25 February 2021. • Docket Number, FD_36472 (and all filings related inclusive) • CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.—CONTROL AND MERGER—PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY This presentation is based on many years of having worked with the railroads that are located in and around the New England Area. I feel there are some potential competition issues with regards the G&W’s “Berkshire Eastern Railroad” taking over the Rail Lines from Ayer, MA West to Mechanicville, NY and the Conn River Rail Lines from White River Junction, VT south to New Haven, CT and the Rail Lines in CT operated currently by Pan Am Railways. I am to outline those issues below along with an alternative operating plan to this current filing. 374 Wickaboag Valley Road, West Brookfield, MA 01585 508-637-1340 [email protected] ~ capital The proposed purchase of Pan Am Railways by CSX Railroad is a brilliant move and shows the forward thinking of the CSX Railroad and its people to extend its reach northeast to the upper New England region and into eastern Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 125/Friday, June 27, 2008/Notices
    36586 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 125 / Friday, June 27, 2008 / Notices Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR examining issues related to the common Filings; Issuance of Procedural 1152.29(e)(2), NSR shall file a notice of carrier obligation of railroads with Schedule. consummation with the Board to signify respect to the transportation of that it has exercised the authority hazardous materials. Persons wishing to SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation granted and fully abandoned the line. If speak at the hearing were directed to Board (Board) is accepting for consummation has not been effected by notify the Board in writing and submit consideration the primary application NSR’s filing of a notice of their written testimony no later than and related filings, filed on May 30, consummation by June 27, 2009, and July 2, 2008. Written testimony from 2008, by Norfolk Southern Railway there are no legal or regulatory barriers other interested parties was also due by Company (Norfolk Southern), Pan Am to consummation, the authority to July 2, 2008. Railways, Inc. (PARI) (a noncarrier abandon will automatically expire. In order to address witness railroad holding company), and two of Board decisions and notices are availability concerns, the Board served PARI’s rail carrier subsidiaries, Boston available on our Web site at ‘‘http:// a decision on June 19, 2008, announcing and Maine Corporation (B&M) and www.stb.dot.gov.’’ that it would grant a short extension and Springfield Terminal Railway Company hold the hearing on Tuesday, July 22, (Springfield Terminal) (collectively, Decided: June 23, 2008. Applicants). The primary application By the Board, Joseph H.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Report
    Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Report Medfield December 11, 2016 Version 1.0 The Medfield Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Committee: Al Brenton (retired), Christian Donner, George Hinkley, Erik Holm, Bob Horgan, Susan Lynch (retired), Jeremy Marsette (retired), Graham Plonski 1 | P a g e CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Why should Medfield move ahead?................................................................................................... 5 Investment .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 5 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 History .................................................................................................................................... 6 2 FEASIBILITY STUDIES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name__________________ historic Housatnnir. Railroad Station_______________ and/or common New Milford Railroad Station 2. Location street & number Railroad not for publication city, town New Milford ftrtdgre~~S£^ vicinity of congressional district state CT code 09 county Litchfield 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district x public occupied agriculture museum x building(s) private x unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation N/A X no military ^x_ other: unused 4. Owner of Property name Town nf IStew Mi 1 ford street & number 10 Main street city, town New Milford vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. New Milford Town Hall street & number 10 Main Street city, town New Milford, state CT 6. Representation in Existing Surveys State Register has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1983 federal state county local depository for survey records Connecticut Historical Commission 59 South city, town Hartford, state CT 06106 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x original site good ruins x altered moved date _ X-fair unexposed (roof) Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance Setting The New Milford Railroad Station is a simple, one-and-one- half-story, gabled-roof frame building which stands on an open site on a commercial street on the west edge of the village center.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 78/Monday, April 26, 2021/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices 22091 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Applicants to supplement their schedule, the Board finds that a submission with the requisite schedule based on the full 180 days [Docket No. FD 36472; Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 1); Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. information for a ‘‘significant’’ allowed by the statute is more 2); Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 3); Docket transaction in accordance with the appropriate. As the Board noted in No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 4); Docket No. FD Board’s regulations, between April 25 Decision No. 1, slip op. at 8, in a 36472 (Sub-No. 5); Docket No. AB 1312X] and June 25, 2021 (i.e., two to four ‘‘significant’’ transaction proceeding, months after the prefiling notice was applicants are required to submit more CSX Corporation and CSX submitted). detailed information regarding Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control DATES: Written comments on the competitive effects, operating plans, and and Merger—Pan Am Systems, Inc., Board’s proposed procedural schedule other issues than in a ‘‘minor’’ Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and must be filed by May 6, 2021. transaction proceeding. Also, unlike in Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this a ‘‘minor’’ transaction proceeding, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland proceeding should be filed with the parties in a ‘‘significant’’ transaction Terminal Company, Springfield Board via e-filing on the Board’s proceeding are permitted to file Terminal Railway Company, Stony website. In addition, one copy of each responsive applications, including Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont filing must be sent (and may be sent by inconsistent applications.
    [Show full text]