Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 78/Monday, April 26, 2021/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 78/Monday, April 26, 2021/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices 22091 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Applicants to supplement their schedule, the Board finds that a submission with the requisite schedule based on the full 180 days [Docket No. FD 36472; Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 1); Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. information for a ‘‘significant’’ allowed by the statute is more 2); Docket No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 3); Docket transaction in accordance with the appropriate. As the Board noted in No. FD 36472 (Sub-No. 4); Docket No. FD Board’s regulations, between April 25 Decision No. 1, slip op. at 8, in a 36472 (Sub-No. 5); Docket No. AB 1312X] and June 25, 2021 (i.e., two to four ‘‘significant’’ transaction proceeding, months after the prefiling notice was applicants are required to submit more CSX Corporation and CSX submitted). detailed information regarding Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control DATES: Written comments on the competitive effects, operating plans, and and Merger—Pan Am Systems, Inc., Board’s proposed procedural schedule other issues than in a ‘‘minor’’ Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and must be filed by May 6, 2021. transaction proceeding. Also, unlike in Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this a ‘‘minor’’ transaction proceeding, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland proceeding should be filed with the parties in a ‘‘significant’’ transaction Terminal Company, Springfield Board via e-filing on the Board’s proceeding are permitted to file Terminal Railway Company, Stony website. In addition, one copy of each responsive applications, including Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont filing must be sent (and may be sent by inconsistent applications. Id. Given & Massachusetts Railroad Company; email only if service by email is these procedural features of Norfolk Southern Railway—Trackage acceptable to the recipient) to each of ‘‘significant’’ transactions, the Board Rights Exemption—CSX the following: (1) Secretary of finds that the schedule proposed by Transportation, Inc.; Norfolk Southern Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Applicants would be too compressed. Railway—Trackage Rights Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2) Indeed, the Applicants’ proposed 127- Exemption—Providence & Worcester Attorney General of the United States, c/ day schedule here is only 22 days longer Railroad; Norfolk Southern Railway— o Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust than the 105-day schedule 3 the Trackage Rights Exemption—Boston & Division, Room 3109, Department of Applicants proposed when they sought Maine Corp.; Norfolk Southern Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (3) to classify this transaction as ‘‘minor.’’ 4 1 Railway—Trackage Rights CSX’s and 747 Merger Sub 2’s (See Notice 14.) Moreover, the Exemption—Pan Am Southern LLC; representative, Anthony J. LaRocca, Applicants provide no explanation why Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 1330 Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad— such an expedited schedule is needed. Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC Operation Exemption—Pan Am Therefore, the Board will propose the 20036; (4) Systems’,2 PAR’s, and PAR Southern LLC; SMS Rail Lines of New following procedural schedule.5 York, LLC—Discontinuance Railroads’ representative, Robert B. Exemption—in Albany County, NY Culliford, Pan Am Systems, Inc., 1700 Iron Horse Park, North Billerica, MA April 26, Application due. 2021. AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. 01862; and (5) any other person May 26, 2021 Board notice of acceptance ACTION: Decision No. 2 in STB Finance designated as a Party of Record on the of application to be pub- Docket No. 36472; Notice of Proposed service list. lished in the Federal Reg- Procedural Schedule and Request for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ister. Comments. Amy Ziehm at (202) 245–0391. June 16, 2021 Notices of intent to partici- Assistance for the hearing impaired is pate in this proceeding SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation due. Board (Board) invites public comments available through the Federal Relay on a proposed procedural schedule for Service at (800) 877–8339. this proceeding. On February 25, 2021, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April CSX Corporation (CSXC), CSX 1, 2021, Applicants filed a petition to Transportation Inc. (CSXT), 747 Merger establish a revised procedural schedule Sub 2, Inc. (747 Merger Sub 2), Pan Am as directed by the Board in Decision No. Systems, Inc. (Systems), Pan Am 1. The Board will propose modifications Railways, Inc. (PAR), Boston and Maine to the Applicants’ proposed schedule. Corporation (Boston & Maine), Maine Under 49 U.S.C. 11325(c), the Board Central Railroad Company (Maine must conclude the evidentiary Central), Northern Railroad (Northern), proceedings for a significant transaction 3 A 105-day schedule is the maximum time Portland Terminal Company (Portland no later than 180 days after publication permitted for the evidentiary proceeding in a Terminal), Springfield Terminal of notice in the Federal Register that the ‘‘minor’’ transaction under 49 U.S.C. 11325(d). Railway Company (Springfield Board has accepted the application. 4 Applicants’ submission was filed as an Terminal), Stony Brook Railroad Here, the Applicants have proposed a application for approval as a ‘‘minor’’ transaction Company (Stony Brook), and Vermont & schedule in which the record would pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(c). However, in Decision No. 1, the Board found that the proposed Massachusetts Railroad Company close 127 days after Federal Register publication. Although section 11325(c) transaction should be classified as a ‘‘significant’’ (V&M) (collectively, Applicants) transaction, which must meet different procedural submitted a filing with the Board. The allows the Board to set a shorter and informational requirements, and that applicants are seeking approval for: (1) Applicants’ submission therefore could not be CSXC, CSXT, and 747 Merger Sub 2 to 1 CSXT is a wholly owned subsidiary of CSXC. treated as an application. The Board determined CSXC and CSXT are referred to collectively as CSX. that it would consider the February 25, 2021 control the seven railroads controlled by 2 Systems directly and wholly owns PAR, which Systems and PAR, and (2) CSXT to submission a prefiling notification, as required in in turn directly and wholly owns four rail carriers: significant transactions. See 49 CFR 1180.4(b)(1). merge six of the seven railroads into Boston & Maine, Maine Central, Portland Terminal, 5 The schedule proposed here is similar in CSXT. In Decision No. 1, served and and Springfield Terminal. Boston & Maine directly and wholly owns Northern and Stony Brook, as duration to the schedule adopted for a ‘‘significant’’ published on March 25, 2021, the Board well as a 98% interest in V&M. These seven rail transaction in Canadian Pacific Railway—Control— accepted the February 25 submission as carriers will be referred to collectively as the PAR Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad, FD 35081 a prefiling notification, thus allowing Railroads. (STB served Dec. 27, 2007). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Apr 23, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 22092 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices June 25, 2021 Descriptions of anticipated review is not required, the Board will classification or implementation of responsive, including in- establish case-specific procedures. 49 product exclusions, contact consistent, applications CFR 1106.4(b), (c). Applicants claim [email protected]. due. Petitions for waiver that an environmental review would not or clarification with re- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For spect to such applications be required for this transaction. (Notice 34–38; CSXC and CSXT Letter to background on the proceedings in this due. Comments, protests, investigation, please see prior notices requests for conditions, Danielle Gosselin, Acting Director, OEA, Apr. 7, 2021 (Environmental Comment including 82 FR 40213 (August 24, and any other evidence 2017), 83 FR 14906 (April 6, 2018), 83 and argument in opposi- EI–30550).) The Board’s Office of tion to the Application or Environmental Analysis is reviewing FR 28710 (June 20, 2018), 83 FR 33608 Related Transactions due. information submitted by Applicants on (July 17, 2018), 83 FR 38760 (August 7, This includes any com- the transaction’s anticipated 2018), 83 FR 47974 (September 21, ments from the U.S. De- environmental impacts and the Board 2018), 83 FR 49153 (September 28, partment of Justice (DOJ) will address environmental review 2018), 83 FR 65198 (December 19, and U.S. Department of 2018), 84 FR 7966 (March 5, 2019), 84 6 issues in a subsequent decision. Transportation (USDOT). FR 20459 (May 9, 2019), 84 FR 29576 July 26, 2021 Responsive, including in- Decided: April 19, 2021. (June 24, 2019), 84 FR 38717 (August 7, consistent, applications By the Board, Board Members Begeman, 2019), 84 FR 46212 (September 3, 2019), due. Fuchs, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz. September 8, Responses to comments, 84 FR 49591 (September 20, 2019), 84 Jeffrey Herzig, 2021. protests, requests for con- FR 57803 (October 28, 2019), 84 FR ditions, and other opposi- Clearance Clerk. 61674 (November 13, 2019), 84 FR tion due, including to [FR Doc. 2021–08493 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am] 65882 (November 29, 2019), 84 FR DOJ and USDOT filings. BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 69012 (December 17, 2019), 85 FR 549 Responses to responsive, (January 6, 2020), 85 FR 6674 (February including inconsistent, 5, 2020), 85 FR 9921 (February 20, applications due. Rebuttal OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 2020), 85 FR 15015 (March 16, 2020), 85 in support of the Applica- FR 17158 (March 26, 2020), 85 FR 23122 tion and Related Trans- TRADE REPRESENTATIVE actions due. (April 24, 2020), 85 FR 27489 (May 8, October 8, Rebuttal in support of re- Notice of Technical Amendment to 2020), and 85 FR 32094 (May 28, 2020). 2021. sponsive, including in- Product Exclusions: China’s Acts, Effective September 24, 2018, the U.S. consistent, applications Policies, and Practices Related to Trade Representative imposed due. Technology Transfer, Intellectual additional 10 percent ad valorem duties TBD ..............
Recommended publications
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Freight Movement
    2012 Regional Transportation Plan Freight Movements Montachusett MPO Freight Movements Chapter 8 – Freight Movements FREIGHT MOVEMENTS Introduction An efficient and cost effective system that allows for the movement of freight and services is essential to the economic vitality of the Montachusett Region and Massachusetts. All aspects or components of a transportation network work together in the delivery of these goods. From rail and highways to airports and seaports, maintaining these systems to insure an effective and efficient network produces benefits that often reach beyond the borders of a region and a state. The Commonwealth has developed the Massachusetts Freight Rail Plan (September 2010) which “provides a comprehensive evaluation of the Commonwealth’s freight transportation system, its operations, and its effect on economic development and quality of life.” This chapter will review freight and goods movement from the overall state perspective though the Freight Plan as it relates to the Montachusett Region as well as an examination of regional issues and concerns. The Freight and Rail Plan can be found at the following website: www.massfreightandrailplan.com. Massachusetts Freight Plan The Massachusetts Freight Plan was completed in September 2010 and encompasses all modes of freight within the Commonwealth. A multi disciplined consultant team, examined conditions, issues, policies and impacts to and associated with the economic development and quality of life for the state. Statewide Goals Within the context of MassDOT policies
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Volume 77
    INDEX TO VOLUME 77 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2016 and 2017 by Kalmbach Publishing Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2017 THROUGH DECEMBER 2017 – 910 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak Capitol Limited at Point of Rocks, Md., Gallery, 10 minutes at Fassifern, In My Own Words, Jan 56-57 Mar 69 Aberdeen & Asheboro: Amtrak consists, Ask TRAINS, Nov 65 Sleepy short line to busy unit train host, Jun 24-31 (correc) Amtrak diners enter service,
    [Show full text]
  • 301796 ENTERED Office of Proceedings March 22, 2021 Part Of
    ~ capital 301796 The Honorable Martin J. Oberman Chairman Surface Transportation Board ENTERED 395 E. Street SW Office of Proceedings Washington, DC 20423 March 22, 2021 202-245-0245 Part of [email protected] Public Record 20 March 2021 Dear Chairman Oberman, I am writing this paper to present an alternative operating plan with reference to the purchase of the Pan Am Railways by the CSX Railroad which was filed to the Surface Transportation Board dated 25 February 2021. • Docket Number, FD_36472 (and all filings related inclusive) • CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.—CONTROL AND MERGER—PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY This presentation is based on many years of having worked with the railroads that are located in and around the New England Area. I feel there are some potential competition issues with regards the G&W’s “Berkshire Eastern Railroad” taking over the Rail Lines from Ayer, MA West to Mechanicville, NY and the Conn River Rail Lines from White River Junction, VT south to New Haven, CT and the Rail Lines in CT operated currently by Pan Am Railways. I am to outline those issues below along with an alternative operating plan to this current filing. 374 Wickaboag Valley Road, West Brookfield, MA 01585 508-637-1340 [email protected] ~ capital The proposed purchase of Pan Am Railways by CSX Railroad is a brilliant move and shows the forward thinking of the CSX Railroad and its people to extend its reach northeast to the upper New England region and into eastern Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 125/Friday, June 27, 2008/Notices
    36586 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 125 / Friday, June 27, 2008 / Notices Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR examining issues related to the common Filings; Issuance of Procedural 1152.29(e)(2), NSR shall file a notice of carrier obligation of railroads with Schedule. consummation with the Board to signify respect to the transportation of that it has exercised the authority hazardous materials. Persons wishing to SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation granted and fully abandoned the line. If speak at the hearing were directed to Board (Board) is accepting for consummation has not been effected by notify the Board in writing and submit consideration the primary application NSR’s filing of a notice of their written testimony no later than and related filings, filed on May 30, consummation by June 27, 2009, and July 2, 2008. Written testimony from 2008, by Norfolk Southern Railway there are no legal or regulatory barriers other interested parties was also due by Company (Norfolk Southern), Pan Am to consummation, the authority to July 2, 2008. Railways, Inc. (PARI) (a noncarrier abandon will automatically expire. In order to address witness railroad holding company), and two of Board decisions and notices are availability concerns, the Board served PARI’s rail carrier subsidiaries, Boston available on our Web site at ‘‘http:// a decision on June 19, 2008, announcing and Maine Corporation (B&M) and www.stb.dot.gov.’’ that it would grant a short extension and Springfield Terminal Railway Company hold the hearing on Tuesday, July 22, (Springfield Terminal) (collectively, Decided: June 23, 2008. Applicants). The primary application By the Board, Joseph H.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan Am Railway Railroad Special Provisions
    Massachusetts Department Of Transportation Highway Division Proposal No. 608612-107113 DOCUMENT A00803 Pan Am Railway Railroad Special Provisions A00803 - 1 Proposal No. 608612-107113 PAN AM RAILWAYS IRON HoRSE PARK No. BILLERICA, MA 01862 Date: ___________ Dear Sirs: Attached is a package of basic requirements for work affecting Railroad property or operations. I. General Information - January 1995. II. Railroad Policies- January 1995. Ill. Standard Railroad Specifications- January·~ Z..OIN IV. Standard Railroad Service Contract - ~- zo 11 The information is subject to change without notice. If you have any further questions, please contact the undersigned at {978)-663-6973. Very truly yours, George S. Thayer Chief Design Engineer en c. A00803 - 2 Proposal No. 608612-107113 .......... -......... ,/' .. ~--- .•~·· .. · MONtREAL _ C • "' A 0 ,t. '~~ · y •' ~ (/' v--~~~/ MQNT'PEUER. i 1 -·- i / ~~~~; -,t ,'i ' . •; I~ , .r .... ---"=\\ S.....l-~­ ' f t · -~ 1 .., _c ~ ..... IC'IUU: / ' ~ "'""'0 -~0 l!ltw!-.....lc - ! ' ' ... ., ........ 7 \Al6AN'I' \l / { '""- i .;7(-l/\1"'-:~ \1 .I _ t'-·""'·· . I_ \~::2J/· · ~_..,, ,ON- '/ ""•- ·j~J,i ,)~HA::~:7~ ;'::J~ · ' ,-;~ "11~ / ~...'. ,:=~_,__L, ' .r~" t GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES ' - ·~ NEw••• • .lrt. .. t.,..... Jk •w "'''" '~ I BOSTON & MAINE CORPORATION •<RlNlON HARR I S RI.I~ G t 'J MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY ltt;f.NO. ,.,..lt ._r>l" l Pf..lo.O/I '/l J ,.f ,•;/' , I 0 tr LIN£S I' ,,/ I lRAJ ,,.;i\(;( lltGH r S SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. ."' ,._ Fl ~ I_ ~~ - ~() /1 ~/ / j·1•) \,I \')/ ,, ., _, fl · / >~ ~~ ·- ~· ~ £ - --~ - rf · ~: r' W fJ. ').M!NI_; 1Q N 0 C . )\ c{J \ / A00803 - 3 - -- _ __ L__> ~I r Proposal No. 608612-107113 SECTION I General Information GTI - Rail Division Engineering Department January 1995 A00803 - 4 Proposal No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Maine State Rail Plan
    Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]
  • [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation And
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/30/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-16328, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control and Merger— Pan Am Systems, Inc., Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland Terminal Company, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Stony Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Decision No. 4 in STB Finance Docket No. 36472; Notice of Acceptance of Application and Related Filings; Issuance of Procedural Schedule. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for consideration the revised application filed on July 1, 2021, by CSX Corporation (CSXC), CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT), 747 Merger Sub 2, Inc. (747 Merger Sub 2), Pan Am Systems, Inc. (Systems), Pan Am Railways, Inc. (PAR), Boston and Maine Corporation (Boston & Maine), Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central), Northern Railroad (Northern), Portland Terminal Company (Portland Terminal), Springfield Terminal Railway Company (Springfield Terminal), Stony Brook Railroad Company (Stony Brook), and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company (V&M) (collectively, Applicants). The application will be referred to as the Revised Application. The Revised Application seeks Board approval under 49 U.S.C. 11321-26 for: CSXC, CSXT, and 747 Merger Sub 2 to control the seven railroads controlled by Systems and PAR, and CSXT to merge six of the seven railroads into CSXT. This proposal is referred to as the Merger Transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2008 Technology + Expertise = Fuel Efficiency
    news Volume 4, Issue 10 October 2008 Technology + expertise = fuel efficiency A new technology is helping Norfolk Southern aspects of the operation of the train to note where train crews save fuel and operate trains more our crews are really making great strides in efficiently. Wireless Event Recorder Information helping to conserve fuel while operating our trains System, or WERIS, is a system that allows infor- as safely and efficiently as possible,” Keller said. mation from a locomotive’s event recorder – a “We also note where we can do more to save on device similar to the black box on an airplane fuel costs.” – to be downloaded at various wireless access Keller said it’s important to carefully analyze points across the system. The data is analyzed the data to make sure NS gets all the benefits it to determine areas where crews are doing well promises to provide. “We are working to ensure at conserving fuel and where there is room for that our crews will receive feedback based on the improvement. data that can help them improve their fuel conser- Fuel efficiency is a major aspect of NS’ Track vation and train handling techniques,” he said. 2012 initiative. Track 2012 is a five-year initiative “We want to make sure we recognize our that sets aggressive goals that describe what NS really good performers among our train crews wants to look like in 2012. NS trains use nearly because they become role models for others,” 1.4 million gallons of fuel per day and 500 million Reynolds said.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover the Royal River and Its Tributaries FISHING THE
    Discover the Royal River and its Tributaries FISHING THE INTERVALE The Royal River is a coastal stream that originates at Sabbathday Lake and flows east, eventually emptying into the Casco Bay in Yarmouth. The most common fish species anglers find in this area are Brook Trout (photo top), Brown Trout (photo bottom), American Eel, Rainbow Smelt, Catfish, and Smallmouth Bass. Each year the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife stocks this section of the River with thousands of Brook and Brown Trout ranging from as little as 1 inch fish to up to 10 inches. Although Brown Trout are technically a non-native species, they are an economically important recreational fishery that were introduced into the Royal River and can grow up to 20 inches in length. Trout, especially the native Brook Trout are very sensitive to environmental changes and can be a good indication of the health of the river. Historically, the Royal River sustained populations of River Herring and Atlantic Salmon. Although once plentiful along the Maine coast and in the rivers during spawning season, Atlantic Salmon populations have been absent from the Royal for decades. Restoration of herring and other species has been the topic of fish passage discussions in recent years in Yarmouth. At the end of the small spur trail, in the marsh, look for a copper and glass sculpture by Evan Haynes titled “Diatoms,” mounted on a granite post. Evan is a sculptor living in North Yarmouth and New Zealand. Etched into the glass block are diatoms and other types of algae. These microscopic plants are among the largest and ecologically most significant group of organisms on the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project Fall
    The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project Winter 2021 GETTING STARTED ABOUT THE PROJECT The Project team began by The Patriot Corridor Double-Stack Clearance Initiative Project collecting data. A 360° laser (the “Project”) is looking at the potential for operating scan of the entire 155-mile double-stacked “domestic” railroad containers along the existing corridor identified obstructions 155 mile long freight railroad corridor known as the PAS Freight that do not meet the 21-foot Main Line (FML). Most of this corridor is owned and operated by vertical clearance for Pan Am Southern Railroad (PAS). The Massachusetts Bay double-stacked containers. The Transportation Authority (MBTA) owns a 15-mile section of the work also included aerial corridor between Fitchburg Station and Ayer, which carries its surveys, inspecting each commuter rail service on the Fitchburg Line. PAS maintains location, and testing for shallow exclusive freight rights on the MBTA Fitchburg Line. bedrock conditions. The study identified 21 bridges and 2 tunnels on the corridor that The Project team identified key are too low for trains to carry double-stacked containers. The issues and developed Project would raise the height of bridges and tunnels or lower the recommendations for making railroad tracks so these freight trains can use the line. MassDOT clearance improvements at and PAS received funding from the Federal Railroad Administration each location. The team (FRA) to collect data, develop a preliminary design, and prepare and evaluated conditions at each file environmental documents. At this time, funding is not identified site and identified for final design and construction.
    [Show full text]