Battle of Hampton Roads

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Battle of Hampton Roads Battle of Hampton Roads he Battle of Hampton Roads is significant because it did not take place on any roads. Instead, it took place in the waters of the James River near Ches- apeake Bay. This battle, also known as the Battle of the Ironclads or the Battle of the Monitor and Merrimack (Virginia) was a naval battle that was fought to break the northern blockade of the ports of Norfolk and Richmond, Virginia. As war with the South became apparent, the U.S. Navy sunk its 40 gun frigate, USS Merrimack in the water of the Elizabeth River, thus keeping it from falling into the hands of the Confederate. The Confederacy raised the ship, added iron sheeting to the hull and renamed the vessel CSS Virginia. Upon hearing of this new addition to the Confederate navy, the North commissioned its own ironclad, USS Monitor. This new naval vessel stood but just eighteen inches above the water line. The two ironclads meet on April 8, 1862. The Merrimack is successful in destroying the USS Congress and the USS Cumberland and minimal damage to the USS Minnesota, all Federal war ships. However, the Monitor and the Merrimack could not harm one another. On April 9th, the Merrimack again takes aim against the Minnesota but this time it is beaten back by the Monitor. The two vessels will cease conflict and the battle will be seen as a tie. However, naval history will never be the same as both France and Great Britain will discontinue building wood-hull ships for combat. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Antietam n September 17, 1862, the Battle of Antietam took place near Antietam Creek in Sharpsburg, Maryland. This was the first battle of the Civil War to take place on northern soil. Maryland was actually slave state but had not taken action to secede from the Union; thus, it was still a part of the North. Though outnumbered two to one, General Robert E. Lee would lead his 45,000 southern troops against the North’s 90,000 troops hoping to take un- der his control federal territory. His army would face General George McClellan, one of the most cautious of the northern leaders, who had been un- able to secure a victory for the North in quite some time. McClellan would become bolder in his actions at Antietam when Union spies discovered Lee’s battle plans wrapped around a bundle of cigars and found in an open field. The South would have been unable to recover from this disadvantage if not for General A.P. Hill who arrives in time to come to the aid of General Lee and helps to repulse the Union army. The Battle of Antietam would be the bloodiest single day of the entire Civil War with more than 23,000 total casualties. However, it would be an unclear victory for either side with neither making a substantial advancement. However, President Abraham Lincoln, waiting for a victory, believed that by keeping the South from taking federal land was enough of a victory to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. This proclamation, which went into effect January 1, 1863, freed all slaves in federally controlled states. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Bull Run he first major land battle of the American Civil War took place on July 21, 1861. The conflict between the Union soldiers of the North and the Confederate soldiers of the South took place near a vital railroad junction near Manassas Junction in Virginia. The Confederate army understood that this battle was important as the North was bound for to the new Confederate capitol of Richmond, Virginia. Thus, they took up command along the Bull Run River as it prepared for battle. At this time, many in the North believed that the war would be swiftly won and no serious preparation would be needed. Therefore, many onlookers with pic- nic baskets made the short twenty-five miles trip southwest of Washington, D. C. to the bluffs above the battlefield. The North began the battle well with its 35,000 troops but the Confederates, 20,000 men fought back and began to scatter the Northern lines. What makes this battle unique is that while the South won the battle they did not know what to do with their win. As the Union army retreated to Washington, D. C. on the heels of the picnickers, the South did not advance in their wake. On the battlefield nearly 3,000 Union and nearly 2,000 Confederate soldiers died. The generals on both sides quickly realized that their armies were ill-prepared and that this war would not be swift nor bloodless. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Fredericksburg fter the Battle of Antietam, President Abraham Lincoln will replace General McClellan with General Ambrose Burnside. Though McClellan was popular with the troops, Lincoln hoped that Burnside would be more aggressive in battle. On December 11 – 15, 1862, the largest concentration of troops, 200,000 in all, would face off against one another at Fredericksburg, Virginia. General Burnside’s goal was to take Fredericksburg and then advance onward to the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia. Burnside’s plan included using platoons to cross the Rappahannock River outside of town. However, heavy snow and miscommunication delayed the federal army. Thus, the southern troops led by General Robert E. Lee, were not only able to secure the high ground of Marye’s Heights above the town of Fredericksburg, it was also able to re- ceive additional troops from General Stonewall Jackson. As Burnside crossed the Rappahannock River, he proceeded to destroy the town of Fredericksburg. He then made a fatal mistake as he planned a frontal attack upon Marye’s Heights and the 8,000 rebel troops upon it. The results of the frontal assault would be significant as the North suffering 12,000 casualties com- pared to 8,000 rebel casualties. The win at the Battle of Fredericksburg would raise the morale of the Confederate troops. Though they had been outnumbered the rebels had been able to overcome the well supplied and well-trained federal forces. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Appomatox Court House s the war continued into the spring of 1865, General Robert E. Lee found himself and his men cut off from needed supplies and in a dire position. There- fore, he abandoned the Confederate capital of Richmond and retreated toward North Carolina where he hoped to join additional troops and supplies. However, the retreat was unsuccessful as spring rains swelled rivers and made roads muddy for travel. Hunger from lack of supplies and horses starved and unsuitable for battle further to weakened the Southern troops. These conditions thus allowed Union General Ulysses S. Grant to cut off and overtake Lee. When it became clear that surrender was inevitable General Lee remarked that he would prefer to die a thousand deaths then give up. Dressed in his full dress uniform the Confederate general met the Union general at Appomattox Court House, VA in the home of Wilmer McLean. McLean had moved his family to this home from Manassas after the First Battle of Battle of Bull Run. Thus, many comment that the Civil War began in McLean’s front yard and ended in his front parlor. Though dressed in his muddy field uniform, General Grant entered the formality of finding peace solemnly, and initiated the reuniting of the country with the terms of surrender. Grant allowed the Rebels to leave the battlefield with their personal belongs. This included their horses, needed once they returned to their farms. Officers would retain their side arms as a sign of respect for their rank. Finally, understanding that starvation was rampant among the Southern troops, rations would be given to all that surrendered before being released to travel home. To those in his own ranks who wanted to celebrate the end of the war with song and revere, General Grant reminded them that “The war is over. The Rebel are our countrymen again.” Grant understood that the celebration of the North was the sorrow of the South. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Chancellorsville t is believed by many that General Robert E. Lee’s greatest victory was the Battle of Chancellorsville. This is because the general broke one of the first princi- ples of warfare; when outnumbered, never divide your forces. The Battle of Chancellorsville took place between April 30 and May 6, 1863 in Spotsylvania County, Virginia near the town of Chancellorsville. It was here that Lee’s 57,000 troops met Union General Joseph Hooker and his 97,000 men. Outnumbered nearly 2:1, Lee understood that drastic measures were the only way for him to find victory on the battlefield. Thus, General Lee sent Lt. General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson to take his 30,000 men and attack Hooker’s week left flank. The results were just as Lee had hoped. Not only did it surprise Hooker, but also it brought chaos and confusion to the Union army. This in turn would lead to the retreat of Hooker and his men. However, the battle was not without its losses. The Union would see 17,000 casualties while the Confederacy would see 13,000. One of those lost by the South was Lt. General Jackson who succumbed to the wounds he suffered from “friendly fire” as he was patrolling his troops one night. General Lee would say that with the loss of Jackson he had “lost his right arm”. Copyright © 2017 Instructomania Battle of Gettysburg he Battle of Gettysburg is significant because it was the second time in which Southern General Robert E.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual - Vol
    FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL - VOL. 1 PROJECT #: FMFADA -101-2009 Submitted to the: By: Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority Interpretive Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19382 Old Quarters #1 151 Bernard Road In association with: Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Leisure Business Advisors, LLC Richmond, VA 23223 and Trudy O’Reilly Public Relations JUNE 24, 2010 Hampton, VA 23661 Cover illustration credit: "Fortress Monroe, Va. and its vicinity". Jacob Wells, 1865. Publisher: Virtue & Co. Courtesy the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center at the Boston Public Library Fort Monroe Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual June 24, 2010 Interpretive Solutions, Inc. FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL Table of Contents Executive Summary . 6 Three Urgent Needs . 7 Part 1: Introduction . 8 1.1. Legislative Powers of the Fort Monroe Authority . 9 1.2. The Programmatic Agreement . 9 1.3 Strategic Goals, Mission and Purpose of the FMA . 10 1.3 The Interpretive Master Plan . 10 1.3.1 Project Background . 11 1.3.2 The National Park Service Planning Model . 12 1.3.3 Phased Approach . 13 1.3.4 Planning Team Overview . 13 1.3.5 Public Participation . 14 Part 2: Background . 16 2.1 The Hampton Roads Setting . 16 2.2 Description of the Resource . 17 2.3 Brief Historical Overview . 19 2.4 Prior Planning . 22 2.5 The Natural Resources Working Group . 22 2.6. The African American Culture Working Group . 22 Part 3: Foundation for Planning . 24 3.1 Significance of Fort Monroe . 24 3.2 Primary Interpretive Themes .
    [Show full text]
  • “What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
    “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Power Records List 4 -2020.P[...]
    This is the last List that will be sent to all emails on our previous email distributor - we will build up a new one. So all friends who order for sure will be on the new distributor. All others please send a short message and we will add you too for sure. The list will be also on our website and we will announce ever new one on facebook. Our own new releases will be on the next List (Xmas or January)! Das ist die letzte Liste die an den alten email Verteiler geschickt wird - wir bauen einen Neuen auf. Alle Besteller werden automatisch in den neuen aufgenommen. Alle Anderen die den Newsletter erhalten möchten senden bitte eine kurze Bestätigung, dass Sie künftig auch wieder in den Verteiler aufgenommen werden wollen. Die Liste wird auch auf unserer Webseite veröffentlicht und immer auf facebook angekündigt. Unsere eigenen neuen Releases werden auf der nächsten Liste erscheinen (um Weihnachten oder im Januar) ! CD ADORNED GRAVES – Being towards a River (NEW*EPIC/THRASH METAL*TOURNIQUET*DELIVERANCE) - 14 GER Private Press 2020 – Brandnew Oldschool 80’s Epic / Thrash Metal with elements of Epic Doom / Death Metal from Germany ! For Fans of Vengeance Rising, Tourniquet, Deliverance, Believer, Martyr / Betrayal or Metallica and Slayer, but also Black Sabbath + Trouble ! Melodic Old School Epic Doom N Thrash Death Metal Einschlägen, der Einfachheit halber als „Thrash Metal“. ALCATRAZZ - Born Innocent (NEW*MELODIC METAL*G.BONNET*RAINBOW*MSG*TNT) - 15 Silver Lining Music 2020 - Brandnew limited CD Digipak Fantastic Melodic Metal / Hard Rock with Original Line up Graham Bonnet, Keyboarder Jimmy Waldo and Bassplayer Gary Shea – now together with Guitar Hero Joe Stump and some fantastic guest musicians: Chris Impellitteri, Bob Kulick, Nozumu Wakai, Steve Vai, Dario Mollo, Don Van Stavern or Jeff Waters For Fans of RAINBOW, TNT, EUROPE, DOKKEN, MICHAEL SCHENKER ANGEL WITCH – Screamin’ ‘n’ Bleedin’ (NEW*LIM.500*NWOBHM CLASSIC 1985) – 18 € N.W.O.B.H.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy in the Civil
    The Navies of the Civil War Overview Anderson, Bern. By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Knopf, 1962. F834 A545b Hearn, Chester G. Naval battles of the Civil War. San Diego: Thunder Bay Press, 2000. UN834 H436n 2000 Oversized Material Porter, David D. The Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Sherman Publishing Co., 1886. F834 P84n Union Joiner, Gary D. Mr. Lincoln’s Brown Water Navy: the Mississippi Squadron. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. UN834 J74m Merrill, James M. The Rebel Shore: the Story of Union Sea Power in the Civil War. Boston: Little, Brown, 1957. F834 M571r Taaffe, Stephen R. Commanding Lincoln's Navy: Union Naval Leadership During the Civil War. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2009. UN834 T111c Confederacy Campbell, R. Thomas, editor. Voices of the Confederate Navy: Articles, Letters, Reports, and Reminiscences. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2008. UN861 V889 Hearn, Chester G. Gray Raiders of the Sea: How Eight Confederate Warships Destroyed the Union's High Seas Commerce. Camden, Maine: International Marine Publishing, 1992. F834z H436g Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Confederate States Navy from Its Organization to the Surrender of Its Last Vessel. Albany, New York: Joseph McDonough, 1894. F834z S31h 1894 Gunboats Walke, Henry. Naval Scenes on the Western Waters. The gunboats Taylor, Carondelet and Lafayette. [S.l., 187-?] F8347 N318 Gosnell, Harpur Allen. Guns on the Western Waters: the Story of River Gunboats in the Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, [1949]. F834 G677g Joyner, Elizabeth Hoxie. The USS Cairo: History and Artifacts of a Civil War Gunboat.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ericsson Letter on Caloric Engines, 1858 January 25 MS0464
    Guide to the John Ericsson Letter on Caloric Engines, 1858 January 25 MS0464 The Mariners' Museum Library At Christopher Newport University Contact Information: The Mariners' Museum Library 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591-7782 Fax: (757) 591-7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.MarinersMuseum.org/library Processed by Bill Edwards-Bodmer, April 2010 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Mariners' Museum Library Title: John Ericsson Letter on Caloric Engines Inclusive Dates: 1858 January 25 Catalog number: MS0464 Physical Characteristics: 1 letter (correspondence) Language: English Creator: Ericsson, John, 1803-1889 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH John Ericsson was born in the province of Vermland, Sweden, on July 31, 1803. The son of a mining engineer, Ericsson showed an early interest in mechanics. By the age of ten, he had designed and constructed a miniature sawmill and by 13, he was a cadet in the Swedish navy. By the age of 17, he entered the Swedish army, joining as an ensign in the 23rd. Corps, a specialized engineering unit for the army. While serving in the army, Ericsson became interested in steam engines and developed the theory for his caloric engine, which operated on the principle that air heated to very high temperature could be used to drive engines. In 1826 Ericsson published a paper on his work to develop a caloric engine. That year he demonstrated his invention to the British Society of Civil Engineers. Although the engine failed in the demonstration, Ericsson impressed the English engineer John Braithwaite. Braithwaite was impressed with the young Swede's determination and offered him a position as a partner in his firm.
    [Show full text]
  • The USS Monitor: in Situ Preservation and Recovery John D
    Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk The USS Monitor 79 The USS Monitor: In Situ Preservation and Recovery John D. Broadwater Program Manager NOAA’s Maritime Heritage Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) USA The views expressed in this article are the personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the US government, the US Department of Commerce, or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). On March 9, 1862 the ironclad warships USS Monitor and CSS Virginia (ex-USS Merrimack) fought to a draw at Hampton Roads, Virginia, in one of the most famous sea battles in the history of the United States. The Monitor sank later that year while being towed south along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Monitor’s remains were not discovered Figure 1: The sinking of USS Monitor, 31 December 1862, as until 1973, lying in 230 ft. (71 m) of water off Cape Hatteras, depicted in Harper’s Weekly Magazine, January 1862 North Carolina. Two years later, the Monitor was designated (NOAA Monitor Collection) America’s first National Marine Sanctuary, and is managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration sea battles in history. The four-hour duel ended in a draw; (NOAA) to prevent looting and unwanted salvage. In situ however, the repercussions were felt worldwide, hastening the preservation was the primary objective of the management abandonment of conventional wooden broadside warships. plan. Of course, certain artifacts were periodically recovered, Although impervious to cannon fire, the Monitor succumbed conserved and curated at a museum of public access out of later that year to the power of the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Stewart L
    RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER THIRTY-THREE This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D.C. Price 25 cents. RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia by Joseph P. Cullen NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL HANDBOOK SERIES NO. 33 Washington, D.C., 1961 The National Park System, of which Richmond National Battlefield Park is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. Contents Page Richmond 1 The Army of the Potomac 2 PART ONE THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN, SUMMER 1862 On to Richmond 3 Up the Peninsula 4 Drewry's Bluff 5 Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) 6 Lee Takes Command 9 The Seven Days Begins 12 Beaver Dam Creek (Ellerson's Mill) 13 Gaines' Mill 16 Savage Station 18 Glendale (Frayser's Farm) 21 Malvern Hill 22 End of Campaign 24 The Years Between 27 PART TWO THE FINAL STRUGGLE FOR RICHMOND, 1864-65 Lincoln's New Commander 28 Cold Harbor 29 Fort Harrison 37 Richmond Falls 40 The Park 46 Administration 46 Richmond, 1858. From a contemporary sketch. HE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR was unique in many respects. One Tof the great turning points in American history, it was a national tragedy op international significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts on the Role of Cavalry in Medieval Warfare
    Acta Periodica Duellatorum 149 Thoughts on the Role of Cavalry in Medieval Warfare Jack Gassmann, Artes Certaminis [email protected] KS Trogen Abstract – This article explores the role of cavalry in medieval warfare starting with it’s origins in the Carolingian age, examining how cavalry was used as a strategic asset within the context of the period on at an operational level, as well as the tactics they were likely to have employed. Due to my interest in both medieval warhorses and mounted combat research into the context and use of medieval cavalry was a natural by-product. Using primary resources such as first-hand accounts and period artwork as well as secondary literature, the article summarizes the findings of my research. Most historians, despite the recognition that field-battles were not the heart and soul of medieval warfare, still judge medieval cavalry by their performance within them. My findings show a much greater concentration on small unit actions, both in armament and organization, with cavalry centred on chevauchées on raiding and subduing castles in swift commando type take and hold missions. The diversity of mounted forces are also examined in the context of the lance and the integration of mounted crossbowmen and bowmen for combined arms tactics. Keywords – cavalry, medieval warfare, strategy, armament, small unit actions 1 INTRODUCTION This paper presents my thoughts and observations on cavalry warfare in the Middle Ages and my views of the dynamics1 at play. This is not a comprehensive work on medieval cavalry, merely the presentation of a different perspective on the operational doctrine of medieval cavalry in the European theatre from 800 to 1500, using treatises on riding and combat, pictorial evidence from period illustrations, surviving accounts, and secondary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • See a Preview of Civil War Activities for Kids
    Table of Contents Generals of the Civil War……………………………………………………………………………………..4 Key People of the Civil War ………………………………………………………………………………….5 Civil War Battles Crossword Puzzle……………………………………………………………………….6 Timeline of Civil War Battles………………………………………………………………………………..8 Confederate States and Dates Word Search…………………………………………………………...9 Generals of the Union and the Confederacy—Venn Diagram Puzzle………………………..10 Grant or Lee……………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 Lincoln or Davis………………………………………………………………………………………………...13 Battle Facts Multiple Choice………………………………………………………………………………..14 North vs. South Tile Puzzle………………………………………………………………………………....15 Generals Matching……………………………………………………………………………………………..17 Gettysburg Address Fill-In………………………………………………………………………………....18 Secession Timeline…………………………………………………………………………………………….19 Battlefield Locations………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Notable People of the Civil War Graph Decoding……………………………………………...….20 Key Dates Fill-In………………………………………………………………………………………………..22 Union and Confederate States Vertical Puzzle……………………………………………………...23 Civil War Maze………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Race to Your Regiment Game……………………………………………………………………………..26 Answer Keys……………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 © 2014 Bonnie Rose Hudson WriteBonnieRose.com 1 Civil War Battles Crossword Puzzle Below are listed a few of the battles of the Civil War. Using the clues shown below, complete the crossword puzzle. (The part of the name in bold is the part that is used in the crossword puzzle.) Battle of Fort Sumter Battle
    [Show full text]
  • Shiloh: Bloody Sacrifice That Changed the Arw
    North Alabama Historical Review Volume 1 North Alabama Historical Review, Volume 1, 2011 Article 14 2011 Shiloh: Bloody Sacrifice that Changed the arW Jeshua Hinton Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.una.edu/nahr Part of the Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hinton, J. (2011). Shiloh: Bloody Sacrifice that Changed the arW . North Alabama Historical Review, 1 (1). Retrieved from https://ir.una.edu/nahr/vol1/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNA Scholarly Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Alabama Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNA Scholarly Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles 161 Shiloh: Bloody Sacrifice that Changed the War Jeshua Hinton The Battle of Shiloh effected a great change on how the American people and its soldiers viewed and fought the Civil War. William Tecumseh Sherman is famous for stating “war is hell,” and Shiloh fit the bill. Shelby Foote writes: This was the first great modern battle. It was Wilson’s Creek and Manassas rolled together, quadrupled, and compressed into a smaller area than either. From the inside it resembled Armageddon […] Shiloh’s casualties [roughly 23,500-24,000], was more than all three of the nation’s previous wars.1 The battle itself was a horrific affair, but Shiloh was simply more than numbers of killed, or the amount of cannon fired, or some other quantifiable misery. The deaths at Shiloh made America comprehend what type of cost would be exacted to continue the war, and was a foreshadowing of the blood-letting that lie ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164
    Guide to the Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164 The Library at The Mariners' Museum Contact Information: The Library at The Mariners' Museum 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591­7782 Fax: (757) 591­7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.mariner.org/library Processed by: Gregg Cina, 2005 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Library at The Mariners' Museum Title: Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog number: MS164 Accession number: None Physical Characteristics: 8 document cases Language(s): English Creator(s): Irwin M. Berent SCOPE AND CONTENT This collection is composed of materials pertaining to the crew and officers who served aboard USS Monitor and CSS Virginia as well as their descendents. Irwin Berent compiled and generated these materials between 1978 and 1988. This collection is the result of his work on two different, but overlapping groups of projects: the first centers on the crew and officers of said vessels; the second concentrates on their descendents. The first group of projects concerns Berent’s research for biographical works he published on the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia. Perhaps the most notable among these is Crewmen of the USS Monitor: A Biographical Directory published in 1982. Materials include photocopies of affidavits, clippings, congressional reports, correspondence, death certificates, depositions, marriage certificates, medical records, military records, notes, and pension records from the 1860s through the 1920s that Berent obtained from the United States National Archives and Records Administration. Related notes and correspondence as well as edited and unedited copies of manuscripts are also included. The second group of projects concerns Berent’s work locating descendents of the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia, his communication with them, and subsequent meetings and events.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2016 Veterans Day 2016 - Washington, DC the MRFA and 9Th Infantry Division Will Be on 11/12)
    Artwork by Dwayne Peterson C Co 4th/47th Riverine Infantry 9th Infantry Division A PUBLICATION OF VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2 THE MOBILE RIVERINE FORCE ASSOCIATION SUMMER 2016 Veterans Day 2016 - Washington, DC The MRFA and 9th Infantry Division will be on 11/12). Room rates are $122 (plus tax) per information on this hotel is available at http:// placing wreaths at the Vietnam Veterans Memo- night. www.arlingtoncourthotel.com/. rial in Washington, DC, on Veterans Day, Friday, For reservations, call 1-703-524-4000 ext. “0.” The MRFA and 9th Infantry Division will have November 11, 2016. We will be gathering at the Please state our group name “MRFA” and give a hospitality room available November 8 to 11. steps of the Lincoln Memorial at 8:30 a.m. and your dates of arrival and departure. If you plan to Come join us as we honor our fallen Brothers on proceed to The Wall at 9:00 a.m. on November attend, you must make your reservations under Veterans Day 2016. We look forward to seeing 11. our group code prior to the cutoff date of October you in DC. We have blocked 40 rooms at the Arlington 10, 2016. For more information, contact Board Member Court Suites, a Clarion Collection Hotel, in Arling- The Arlington Court Suites is located at 1200 N Bob (Doc) Pries, (513) 659-4974, pries247@ ton, Virginia, from November 8 to 11 (check out Courthouse Rd, Arlington, Virginia 22201. More gmail.com. ★ From the Galley New Web Site for MRFA Folks Mike has done an excellent job with the web site we now have but it’s way over- due to be redone and Mike has been given the go ahead on this project.
    [Show full text]