Mel Rodgers1, Mitch Hastings1, Glenn Thompson1, Diana Roman2 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mel Rodgers1, Mitch Hastings1, Glenn Thompson1, Diana Roman2 1 Locations of families of repeating events at Telica Volcano, Nicaragua Mel Rodgers1, Mitch Hastings1, Glenn Thompson1, Diana Roman2 1. University of South Florida. 2. Carnegie Institution of Washington −88.00˚ −86.00˚ −84.00˚ −82.00˚ 12.00˚ 1. Introduction Honduras 3. Results 14.00˚ −87.00˚ −86.00˚ Cosiguina 13.00˚ Nicaragua Telica is a Persistently Restless Volcano with ☀ San Cristobal Telica 12.00˚ 3.1 Multiplet “1” stack high rates of seismicity (>100s Cerro Negro Momotombo 12.65˚ events/day), high levels of degassing and Costa Rica10.00˚ 12.00˚ frequent small explosions. Locating events is dicult due to the ☀ TBHS low-amplitude, low-frequency and Telica TBTN 12.60˚ TBCF emergent nature of the waveforms. TBHY TBMR ☀ Telica has a high rate of multiplet km occurrence. Between 2010-2013 ~25% of TBCA 0 2 4 events belonged to a multiplet. 12.55˚ In this study we locate multiplets using TESAND seismic (broad band) ☀ Active vent STACK STACK waveform cross-correlation stacking to −86.90˚ −86.85˚ −86.80˚ TBHS TBHY obtain rst arrivals. Figure 1. Location of Telica & TESAND network stations. 2. Methods Prior work: • TESAND network deployed between 2010-2013. • STA/LTA event detection and catalogue creation in Antelope ->200,000 events. • Full cross-correlation using Peakmatch (Rodgers et al., 2015a) at single station TBTN of all events -> ~9000 multiplets (51,000 events) correlated above xcorr threshold 0.8. STACK STACK This study: TBMR TBTN 1. Using the multiplets previously identied on TBTN we select the 51 multiplets that contained more than 50 events per family (Ranging from ~5,000 to 50 events). Figure 5. Multiplet “1” (below). 16 waveforms correlate with each other above a cross-correlation threshold of 0.8 at 4 stations. Only 8 2. We nd these events on other stations in the network and identify a subset of events waveforms shown here. Stack is shown in bottom panel on all that correlate with each other on all other stations. stations. The TBTN stack is the same as shown in Figure 4. Figure 2. Multiplet 3.2 Preliminary locations TBTN Final subset selection TBHS TBHY TBMR Multiplet 1 Group criteria diagram Figure 6. Preliminary locations of Waveform A A A A A Multiplet 1 a subset of events from two Waveform B B Multiplet 2 Multiplets. 12.62˚ TESAND Station Waveform C C C C C TBHS - Multiplet “1” (blue): Master Waveform D D D event from May 2012. Events Waveform E E spanning December 2011 - Waveform F F F F F February 2013. The 8 located 12.61˚ events have an average rms of Xcorr > 0.8 Xcorr > 0.8 TBTN 0.8, azimuthal gap of 157, average horizontal error of xxx TBCF km and vertical error of xxxx km - Multiplet “2” (red): Master 3. From this nal group we stack the waveforms on each station 12.60˚ TBHY event from September 2011. Figure 3. Multiplet Events spanning from August TBTN TBHS TBHY TBMR 2011 to September 2012. The 3 A A A A stack diagram TBMR km located events have an average C C C C 12.59˚ rms of 0.42, azimuthal gap of 163, 0 0.5 1 F F F F average horizontal error of xxx −86.85˚ −86.84˚ −86.83˚ km and vertical error of xxx km STACK STACK STACK STACK 4. Pick the rst arrival on the stacked waveform and calculate an arrival 4. GISMO framework time for each waveform at each station. - This workow and code has been developed in the GISMO toolbox framework. 10 6 TBTN - stack (BHZ) - starting 2012-05-11 15:47:51.960 4 - GISMO is a seismic data analysis toolbox for MATLAB: https://geoscience-community-codes.github.io/GISMO 3 Figure 4. Stacked - This code will be available in the repository of GISMO 2 Stack waveform for Pick contributed code. 1 nm Multiplet “1” 0 (Figure 6) at TBTN 5. Future Work -1 (BHZ) showing - Integrate GISMO workow into Antelope -2 example pick. - Run for all multiplets! 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Seconds References & Data Acknowledgements: Lienert, B.R., Havskov, J., 1995. A Computer Program for Locating Earthquakes Both Locally and Globally. Seismol. Res. Lett. 66, 26–36. 5. Locate events using picks from these rst arrivals. Horizontal component can be Rodgers, M., Rodgers, S., Roman, D.C., 2015a. Peakmatch: A Java Program for Multiplet Analysis of Large Seismic Datasets. Seismol. Res. Lett. 86, 1208–1218. Rodgers, M., Roman, D.C., Geirsson, H., LaFemina, P., McNutt, S.R., Muñoz, A., Tenorio, V., 2015b. Stable and unstable phases of elevated seismic activity at the used for S-wave pick. persistently restless Telica Volcano, Nicaragua. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 290, 63–74. -> Preliminary locations obtained using HYPOCENTER (Lienert and Havskov, Thompson G. and Reyes, C., (2018) GISMO - a seismic data analysis toolbox for MATLAB [software package], http://geoscience-community-codes.github.io/GISMO/. Accessed August 2018. 1995) using the velocity model of Rodgers et al. 2015b. Telica data was collected by the TESAND network (NSF EAR-0911366 to D.Roman and P.LaFemina) .
Recommended publications
  • DIPECHO VI Central America FINAL
    European Commission Instructions and Guidelines for DG ECHO potential partners wishing to submit proposals for a SIXTH DIPECHO ACTION PLAN IN CENTRAL AMERICA COSTA RICA, EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA, PANAMA Budget article 23 02 02 Deadline for submitting proposals: 30 April 2008 1 Table of contents BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................ 3 1. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME AND PRIORITY ISSUES FOR THE 6TH ACTION PLAN FOR CENTRAL AMERICA .............................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Principal objective .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Specific objective ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Strategic programming imperatives (sine qua non)......................................................................... 6 1.4 Type of activities ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Priorities in terms of geographical areas, hazards and sectors ...................................................... 11 1.6 Visibility and Communication requirements................................................................................. 16 2. FINANCIAL ALLOCATION PROVIDED ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boletín Mensual Sismos Y Volcanes De Nicaragua Enero, 2021
    Boletín Sismos y Volcanes de Nicaragua. Enero, 2021. Dirección General de Geología y Geofísica Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales Dirección General de Geología y Geofísica Boletín mensual Sismos y Volcanes de Nicaragua Enero, 2021 Mapa epicentral de sismos localizados en Nicaragua. Enero, 2021 pág. 1 Boletín Sismos y Volcanes de Nicaragua. Enero, 2021. Dirección General de Geología y Geofísica Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales (INETER) Dirección General de Geología y Geofísica Boletín Sismológico, Vulcanológico y Geológico Enero, 2021 Las observaciones rutinarias de sismicidad, vulcanismo y otros fenómenos geológicos en NIC, resultan del sistema de monitoreo y vigilancia desarrollado y mantenido por INETER. El contenido de este boletín se basa en el trabajo de las siguientes personas: Monitoreo Sismológico – Turno Sismológico Antonio Acosta, Greyving Argüello, Amilcar Cabrera, Milton Espinoza, Petronila Flores, Miguel Flores Ticay, Fernando García, Juan Carlos Guzmán, Ulbert Grillo, Martha Herrera, Domingo Ñamendi, Ana Rodríguez Lazo, Wesly Rodríguez, Jacqueline Sánchez, Emilio Talavera, Virginia Tenorio. Procesamiento Final de los Registros Sísmicos Jacqueline Sánchez, Virginia Tenorio Monitoreo Volcánico Eveling Espinoza, Armando Saballos, Martha Ibarra, David Chavarría, Teresita Olivares, Dodanis Matus, Elvis Mendoza, Rinath José Cruz Talavera Mantenimiento de la Red Sísmica y Sistemas Electrónicos Antonio Acosta, Martha Herrera, Fernando García, Domingo Ñamendis, Allan Morales, Ulbert Grillo Departamento Tecnología Información y Comunicación Miguel Flores, Norwing Acosta, Ernesto Mendoza Geología Carmen Gutiérrez, Gloria Pérez, Francisco Mendoza, Ada Mercado Rodríguez, Bianca Vanegas, Rosario Avilés Preparación Final del Catálogo Virginia Tenorio Febrero, 2021 Algunos artículos particulares llevan los nombres de los autores respectivos, quienes Son responsables por la veracidad de los datos presentados y las conclusiones alcanzadas.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision 2 Understanding Magmatic Processes at Telica Volcano
    Revision 2 Understanding magmatic processes at Telica volcano, Nicaragua: Crystal size distribution and textural analysis Molly Witter1,2*, Tanya Furman1, Peter LaFemina1, Maureen Feineman1 1 Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 2 Now at: Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford CA, 94305 USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Abstract 1 Telica volcano in Nicaragua currently exhibits persistent activity with continuous seismicity and 2 degassing, yet it has not produced lava flows since 1529. To provide insight into magma 3 chamber processes including replenishment and crystallization, crystal size distribution (CSD) 4 profiles of plagioclase feldspar phenocrysts were determined for Quaternary Telica basalts and 5 basaltic andesites. Textural analysis of fourteen highly crystalline lavas (>30 vol.% phenocrysts) 6 indicates that the samples are dominated by sieve-textured plagioclase feldspar phenocrysts 7 whose origin requires thermochemical disequilibrium within the magmatic system. The CSD 8 curves display an inverse relationship between phenocryst length and population density. 9 Concave-up patterns observed for the Telica lava samples can be represented by linear segments 10 that define two crystal populations: a steeply-sloping segment for small crystals (<1.5 mm) and a 11 gently-sloping segment for crystals >1.5 mm in length. The two crystal populations may be 12 explained by magma replenishment and a mixing model in which a mafic magma is introduced 13 to a stable chamber that is petrologically and geochemically evolving. Residence times 14 calculated using the defined linear segments of the CSD curves suggest these magmatic 15 processes occur over time scales on the order of decades to centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Halogen Activation in the Plume of Masaya Volcano: field Observations and Box Model Investigations
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3371–3393, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3371-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Halogen activation in the plume of Masaya volcano: field observations and box model investigations Julian Rüdiger1,2, Alexandra Gutmann1, Nicole Bobrowski3,4, Marcello Liotta5, J. Maarten de Moor6, Rolf Sander4, Florian Dinger3,4, Jan-Lukas Tirpitz3, Martha Ibarra7, Armando Saballos7, María Martínez6, Elvis Mendoza7, Arnoldo Ferrufino7, John Stix8, Juan Valdés9, Jonathan M. Castro10, and Thorsten Hoffmann1 1Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany 2Environmental Chemistry and Air Research, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany 3Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany 4Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 5Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Palermo, Italy 6Observatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Costa Rica Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica 7Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales, Managua, Nicaragua 8Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 9Laboratorio de Química de la Atmósfera, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica 10Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany Correspondence: Thorsten Hoffmann ([email protected]) Received: 25 March 2020 – Discussion started: 22 June 2020 Revised: 9 January 2021 – Accepted: 26 January 2021 – Published: 4 March 2021 Abstract. Volcanic emissions are a source of halogens in the sensing observations (differential optical absorption spec- atmosphere. Rapid reactions convert the initially emitted hy- troscopy; DOAS). The reactive fraction of bromine increased drogen halides (HCl, HBr, and HI) into reactive species such from 0.20 ± 0.13 at the crater rim to 0.76 ± 0.26 at 2.8 km as BrO, Br2, BrCl, ClO, OClO, and IO.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Initiative
    Versión 1.0, 14 de octubre de 2015 www.earthobservations.org/gsnl.php Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Initiative A.1 Proposal Title: Volcano-tectonic Geohazard Interaction within the Nicaraguan Depression Volcanoes: Cosiguina, San Cristóbal, Telica, Cerro Negro, Momotombo, Península de Chiltepe, Masaya and Concepción A.2 Supersite Coordinator Email (Organization only) [email protected] Name: Iris Valeria Surname: Cruz Martínez Position: Director General of Geology and Geophysics Personal website: <In case a personal web page does not exist, please provide a CV below this table> Institución: Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales-INETER- Nicaragua Type of institution Government (Government, Education, other): The institution's web address: https://www.ineter.gob.ni/ Address: Front of Solidarity Hospital City: Managua Postal Code/Postal Code: 2110 Managua, Nicaragua Country: Nicaragua Province, Territory, State or Managua County: Phone number: Tel. +505-22492761 Fax +505-22491082 1 Versión 1.0, 14 de octubre de 2015 A.3 Core Supersite Team Email (Organization only) [email protected] Name: Federico Vladimir Surname: Gutiérrez Corea Position: Director of the Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies-INETER- Nicaragua Personal website: http://www.vlado.es/ http://uni.academia.edu/FedericoVLADIMIRGutierrez/Curriculu mVitae Institution: Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies-INETER-Nicaragua Type of institution Government (Government, Education, others): Institution's web address: https://www.ineter.gob.ni/
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Activity in Costa Rica in 2012 Official Annual Summary
    Volcanic Activity in Costa Rica in 2012 Official Annual Summary Turrialba volcano on January 18 th , 2012: central photo, the 2012 vent presents flamme due to the combustion of highly oxidant magmatic gas (photo: J.Pacheco). On the right, ash emission by the 2012 vent at 4:30am the same day (photo: G.Avard).On the left, incandescence is visible since then (photo: G.Avard 2-2-2012, 8pm). Geoffroy Avard, Javier Pacheco, María Martínez, Rodolfo van der Laat, Efraín Menjivar, Enrique Hernández, Tomás Marino, Wendy Sáenz, Jorge Brenes, Alejandro Aguero, Jackeline Soto, Jesus Martínez Observatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Costa Rica OVSICORI-UNA 1 I_ Introduction At 8:42 a.m. on September 5 th , 2012, a Mw = 7.6 earthquake occurred 20 km south of Samara, Peninsula de Nicoya, Guanacaste. The maximum displacement was 2.5 m with a maximum vertical motion about 60 cm at Playa Sa Juanillo (OVSICORI Report on September 11 th , 2012). The fault displacement continued until the end of September through postseismic motions, slow earthquakes, viscoelastic response and aftershocks (> 2500 during the first 10 days following the Nicoya earthquake). The seismicity spread to most of the country (Fig.1) Figure 1: Seismicity in September 2012 and location of the main volcanoes. Yellow star: epicenter of the Nicoya seism on September 5 th , 2012 (Mw = 7.6). White arrow: direction of the displacement due to the Nicoya seism (map: Walter Jiménez Urrutia, Evelyn Núñez, y Floribeth Vega del grupo de sismología del OVSICORI-UNA). Regarding the volcanoes, the seism of Nicoya generated an important seismic activity especially in the volcanic complexes Irazú-Turrialba and Poás as well as an unusual seismic activity mainly for Miravalles, Tenorio and Platanar-Porvenir.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua Geothermal Energy Market Overview Nicaragua Geothermal Energy Market Overview April 2021
    Nicaragua Geothermal Energy Market Overview Nicaragua Geothermal Energy Market Overview April 2021 Key Facts • Current installed geothermal power generation capacity of 109 MW (as of Abstract: April 2021) • The two geothermal The presence of active volcanic activity along the Pacific coast means Nicaragua is endowed with a substantial geothermal plants are operated potential estimated at around 1,500 MWe. Geothermal power by private entities generation began in 1983 with the startup of the Momotom- bo power plant when the first 35 MWe unit was installed to • Geothermal resource operate and a second unit of 35 MW was installed in 1989. A potential is estimated Geothermal Master Plan was prepared in 2001 that permits classification of the recognised geothermal areas in terms of at around 1,500 MW development potential and planning of the successive stages of exploration and development in order to achieve the goal of • The largest plant orderly and efficient development of the geothermal resources is the San Jacinto- of Nicaragua. In 2004, the first energy policy for the country Tizate plant with an was passed by the president of Nicaragua, with a principal installed capacity of objective of developing Nicaragua’s energy sector, with the main focus on renewables. The approval of Nicaraguan’s geo- 72 MW thermal law (established in 2002) and energy policies put the foundations to attract local and foreign private investment in • Additional capacity geothermal projects. The best strategy to structurally reduce planned or on the and stabilize national electricity tariffs is transforming the drawing board for electric mix toward 100% renewable prioritising the explora- 180 MW tion of existing wind, geothermal, biomass, and hydro in the medium-long term period.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras with Costa Rica Extension Departs 7Th March 2021
    a Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras with Costa Rica extension Departs 7th March 2021 Itinerary correct as at Mar 09, 2020, but subject to change. ALL flights to be confirmed. www.bluedottravel.com.au $13,690 pp Economy class flights Ex Syd/Mel, twin-share Single supp $1,480 NICARAGUA, EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA AND HONDURAS Four countries… similar, but different. Nicaragua is the largest of the Central American countries by land size. Colonised on the Pacific coast by the Spanish and on the Atlantic coast by the British. Add an African-Caribbean influence with the indigenous peoples and you have a melting pot of cultures. The contra war of the 1980’s caused wide-spread poverty and casualties however more recently, there has been economic growth, albeit very small. The country has a growing tourism industry and now is a good time to visit given tourism is in its infancy and you can experience the genuine culture. By contrast, El Salvador is Central America’s smallest country by land size and the only country in the region without a coastline on the Atlantic/Caribbean side. It has a high population density with around 7 million inhabitants living in a size less than half of Tasmania. It is a very mountainous country and part of the Pacific Rim of Fire, and subject to earthquakes. Spanish explorers became the first European visitors and went about the changing the lives of indigenous Pipil Indians forever in the mid 1500’s. Coffee, corn, beans and rice form its main agricultural produce. Honduras is a predominantly Roman Catholic country also ruled by Spain from the 16th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Solentiname-Tours-Brochure.Pdf
    Located in the heart of the Central American isthmus, Nicaragua is the land bridge Welcome between North and South America. It separates the Pacific Ocean from the Caribbean to Nicaragua Sea. The bellybutton of America is unique, due to its almost virgin land. Our republic is being rediscovered as a key part of a wonderful natural world. Nicaragua's great cul- ture and history have much to offer. This unique stretch of land offers a variety of trop- ical fruits unknown to the rest of the world, one of the largest lake of the world and many biological reserves and nature parks with their native plant and animal species. We invite you to experience this extraordinary culture and exceptional natural beauty among the most amiable people on earth. Our team of experts in alternative and sus- tainable tourism specializes in organizing unique lifetime experience for your clients. Each tour package reflects their interests, personal needs, and budget. Flexibility and creativity allow us to design programs for individuals, retired or student groups, suggest multiple package options, or recommend an exclusive itinerary with private plans and deluxe accommodations. We have best specialist Ecological, Culture, Adventure and Incentive Programs. You and your clients remain confident that all is taken care of when Solentiname Tours makes the arrangements. We are pleased to work with you. We invite you to review this manual and contact us for specific suggestions and additional information. Immanuel Zerger Owner and General Director First Stop Managua,
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Download
    E . - 1 o.2 4. "Made available under NAgA spnsersAp in the interest of early and wide dis- 6't' -/3.S-/ semination of Earth Resources Survey Progfam information and without liability for any use made thereof." INVESTIGATION OF PROTOTYPE VOLCANO-SURVEILLANCE NETWORK Peter L. Ward Jerry P.- U.S. Geological Survey National Center for Earthquake Research Menlo Park, California 94025 I September 1973 Type I Progress Report for Period I July 1973 to 31 August 1973 (E73-11024) INVESTIGATION OF PROTOTYPE N73-31328 VOLCANO-SURVEILLANCE NETWORK Report, Progress 1 Jul. - 31 Aug. 1973 (National Center for Earthquake Research) 3 p HC Unclas $3.00- CSCL 08G G3/13 01024 Prepared for: Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 Type I Progress Report ERTS-A a. Title: Investigation of prototype volcano-surveillance network ERTS-A Proposal No.: 145 b. GSFC Id No. of P.I.: IN 384 C. Problems: Principal problem is that the programmer cards of the DCP's are unreliable. Over 50% provided have failed at one time or another. Presently 6 out of 28 are defective, and two show subtle problems, which we are trying to isolate. We are waiting for replacements. Transmitters are not available to put at these sites already installed. Three more sites would be installed If reliable transmitters were available. The programmer cards are the only part of this study that are performing well below the expected reliability. d. Accomplishments: All equipment has been installed except for problems noted in c. A computer analysis program has,been developed and. is in use to analyze the data on teletype punched tape and computer cards.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Measurements from the Costa Rica–Nicaragua Volcanic Segment Suggest Possible Along-Arc Variations in Volcanic Gas Chemistry ∗ A
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 407 (2014) 134–147 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Gas measurements from the Costa Rica–Nicaragua volcanic segment suggest possible along-arc variations in volcanic gas chemistry ∗ A. Aiuppa a,b, , P. Robidoux a, G. Tamburello a, V. Conde c, B. Galle c, G. Avard d, E. Bagnato a, J.M. De Moor d, M. Martínez d, A. Muñóz e a Dipartimento DiSTeM, Università di Palermo, Italy b Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Palermo, Italy c Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden d Observatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Costa Rica (OVSICORI-UNA), Costa Rica e Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales (INETER), Nicaragua a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Obtaining accurate estimates of the CO2 output from arc volcanism requires a precise understanding of Received 10 May 2014 the potential along-arc variations in volcanic gas chemistry, and ultimately of the magmatic gas signature Received in revised form 23 September of each individual arc segment. In an attempt to more fully constrain the magmatic gas signature of the 2014 Central America Volcanic Arc (CAVA), we present here the results of a volcanic gas survey performed Accepted 23 September 2014 during March and April 2013 at five degassing volcanoes within the Costa Rica–Nicaragua volcanic Available online xxxx segment (CNVS). Observations of the volcanic gas plume made with a multicomponent gas analyzer Editor: B.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1133, V. 1.2, Table 3
    Table 3. (following pages). Spreadsheet of volcanoes of the world with eruption type assignments for each volcano. [Columns are as follows: A, Catalog of Active Volcanoes of the World (CAVW) volcano identification number; E, volcano name; F, country in which the volcano resides; H, volcano latitude; I, position north or south of the equator (N, north, S, south); K, volcano longitude; L, position east or west of the Greenwich Meridian (E, east, W, west); M, volcano elevation in meters above mean sea level; N, volcano type as defined in the Smithsonian database (Siebert and Simkin, 2002-9); P, eruption type for eruption source parameter assignment, as described in this document. An Excel spreadsheet of this table accompanies this document.] Volcanoes of the World with ESP, v 1.2.xls AE FHIKLMNP 1 NUMBER NAME LOCATION LATITUDE NS LONGITUDE EW ELEV TYPE ERUPTION TYPE 2 0100-01- West Eifel Volc Field Germany 50.17 N 6.85 E 600 Maars S0 3 0100-02- Chaîne des Puys France 45.775 N 2.97 E 1464 Cinder cones M0 4 0100-03- Olot Volc Field Spain 42.17 N 2.53 E 893 Pyroclastic cones M0 5 0100-04- Calatrava Volc Field Spain 38.87 N 4.02 W 1117 Pyroclastic cones M0 6 0101-001 Larderello Italy 43.25 N 10.87 E 500 Explosion craters S0 7 0101-003 Vulsini Italy 42.60 N 11.93 E 800 Caldera S0 8 0101-004 Alban Hills Italy 41.73 N 12.70 E 949 Caldera S0 9 0101-01= Campi Flegrei Italy 40.827 N 14.139 E 458 Caldera S0 10 0101-02= Vesuvius Italy 40.821 N 14.426 E 1281 Somma volcano S2 11 0101-03= Ischia Italy 40.73 N 13.897 E 789 Complex volcano S0 12 0101-041
    [Show full text]