DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation Local Plan Preferred Scenario Transport Assessment Horsham Transport Study Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation TRICS 7.7.3 Trip Rate Parameter:No of Dwellings TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS: Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED TOTAL VEHICLES Selected regions and areas: 2 SOUTH EAST ES EAST SUSSEX3 days EX ESSEX 1 days HC HAMPSHIRE2 days HF HERTFORDSHIRE1 days KC KENT 2 days SC SURREY 2 days WS WEST SUSSEX5 days 3 SOUTH WEST DC DORSET 1 days SM SOMERSET 1 days 4 EAST ANGLIA NF NORFOLK 8 days SF SUFFOLK 1 days 5 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE1 days 6 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE2 days ST STAFFORDSHIRE2 days WK WARWICKSHIRE2 days 7 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NE NORTH EAST1 LINCOLNSHIREdays NY NORTH YORKSHIRE2 days 8 NORTH WEST CH CHESHIRE 2 days LC LANCASHIRE1 days 9 NORTH DH DURHAM 1 days This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set Primary Filtering selection: This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation. Parameter:No of Dwellings Actual Range:10 to 984 (units: ) Range Selected300 byto 3000User: (units: ) Public Transport Provision: Selection by:Include all surveys Date Range:01/01/12 to 19/11/19 This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation. Selected survey days: Monday 8 days Tuesday 7 days Wednesday11 days Thursday 9 days Friday 5 days Sunday 1 days This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week. Selected survey types: Manual count38 days Directional ATC3 days Count This data displays the total the adding number whilst up ATCof to manual thesurveys overall classified are number undertaking surveys of surveys and using the inmachines. numberthe selected of unclassified set. Manual ATC surveys surveys are undertaken using staff Selected Locations: Town Centre 0 Edge of Town Centre0 Suburban Area (PPS60 Out of Centre) Edge of Town 41 Neighbourhood Centre0 (PPS6 Local Centre) Free Standing (PPS6 Out0 of Town) Not Known 0 This data displays Edge ofthe Town number Suburban of surveys Area Neighbourhood per main Edge location Centre of Town Towncategory Centre Centre within and the Not selected Known. set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing Selected Location Sub Categories: Industrial Zone 0 Commercial Zone 0 Development Zone 0 Residential Zone 38 Retail Zone 0 Built-Up Zone 0 Village 0 Out of Town 1 High Street 0 No Sub Category 2 This data displays Industrial the numberZone Development of surveys Residential Zone per location ZoneRetail Zonesub-category Built-Up withinZone Village the selected Out ofset. Town The High location Street sub-categories and No Sub Category. consist of Commercial Zone Secondary Filtering selection: Use Class: C3 41 days This data displays which the can number be found of within surveys the per Library Use Class module classification of TRICS®. within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose Population within 500m Range: All Surveys Included Population within 1 mile: 1,000 or Less1 days 1,001 to 5,0006 days 5,001 to 10,00010 days 10,001 to 15,00015 days 15,001 to 20,0005 days 20,001 to 25,0003 days 25,001 to 50,0001 days This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population. Population within 5 miles: 5,001 to 25,0004 days 25,001 to 50,0006 days 50,001 to 75,0005 days 75,001 to 100,0009 days 100,001 to 125,0001 days 125,001 to 250,00012 days 250,001 to 500,0004 days This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population. Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 10 days 1.1 to 1.5 29 days 1.6 to 2.0 2 days This data displays within the a radius number of 5-milesof selected of selected surveys survey within sites.stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling Travel Plan: Yes 16 days No 25 days This data displays and the the number number of of surveys surveys that within were the undertaken selected set at thatsites were without undertaken Travel Plans. at sites with Travel Plans in place PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present40 days 2 Poor 1 days This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings. LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters 1 CH-03-A-09TERRACED HOUSESCHESHIRE GREYSTOKE ROAD HURDSFIELD MACCLESFIELD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 24 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 2 CH-03-A-10SEMI-DETACHEDCHESHIRE & TERRACED MEADOW DRIVE BARNTON NORTHWICH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 40 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 3 DC-03-A-08BUNGALOWSDORSET HURSTDENE ROAD CASTLE LANE WEST BOURNEMOUTH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 28 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 4 DH-03-A-03SEMI-DETACHEDDURHAM & TERRACED PILGRIMS WAY DURHAM Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 57 Survey date:FRIDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 5 DS-03-A-02MIXED HOUSESDERBYSHIRE RADBOURNE LANE DERBY Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 371 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 6 ES-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSESEAST & SUSSEX FLATS SHEPHAM LANE POLEGATE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 212 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 7 ES-03-A-04 MIXED HOUSESEAST & SUSSEX FLATS NEW LYDD ROAD CAMBER Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 134 Survey date:FRIDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 8 ES-03-A-05 MIXED HOUSESEAST & SUSSEX FLATS RATTLE ROAD STONE CROSS NEAR EASTBOURNE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 99 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 9 EX-03-A-02 DETACHED &ESSEX SEMI-DETACHED MANOR ROAD GRANGE HILL CHIGWELL Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 97 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 10 HC-03-A-21TERRACED &HAMPSHIRE SEMI-DETACHED PRIESTLEY ROAD HOUNDMILLS BASINGSTOKE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 39 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 11 HC-03-A-22MIXED HOUSESHAMPSHIRE BOW LAKE GARDENS BISHOPSTOKE NEAR EASTLEIGH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 40 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 12 HF-03-A-03MIXED HOUSESHERTFORDSHIRE HARE STREET ROAD BUNTINGFORD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 160 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 13 KC-03-A-04SEMI-DETACHEDKENT & TERRACED KILN BARN ROAD DITTON AYLESFORD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 110 Survey date:FRIDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 14 KC-03-A-07MIXED HOUSESKENT RECULVER ROAD HERNE BAY Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 288 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 15 LC-03-A-31 DETACHED HOUSESLANCASHIRE GREENSIDE COTTAM PRESTON Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 32 Survey date:FRIDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 16 NE-03-A-02SEMI DETACHEDNORTH & DETACHEDEAST LINCOLNSHIRE HANOVER WALK SCUNTHORPE Edge of Town No Sub Category Total No of Dwellings: 432 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 17 NF-03-A-03DETACHED HOUSESNORFOLK HALING WAY THETFORD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 10 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 18 NF-03-A-04MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK NORTH WALSHAM ROAD NORTH WALSHAM Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 70 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 19 NF-03-A-05MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK HEATH DRIVE HOLT Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 40 Survey date:THURSDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 20 NF-03-A-06MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK BEAUFORT WAY BRADWELL GREAT YARMOUTH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 275 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 21 NF-03-A-07MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK & FLATS SILFIELD ROAD WYMONDHAM Edge of Town Out of Town Total No of Dwellings: 297 Survey date:SUNDAY ######## Survey Type:DIRECTIONAL ATC COUNT 22 NF-03-A-09MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK & FLATS ROUND HOUSE WAY CRINGLEFORD NORWICH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 984 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 23 NF-03-A-10MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK & FLATS HUNSTANTON ROAD HUNSTANTON Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 17 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:DIRECTIONAL ATC COUNT 24 NF-03-A-16MIXED HOUSESNORFOLK & FLATS NORWICH COMMON WYMONDHAM Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 138 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:DIRECTIONAL ATC COUNT 25 NY-03-A-10HOUSES ANDNORTH FLATS YORKSHIRE BOROUGHBRIDGE ROAD RIPON Edge of Town No Sub Category Total No of Dwellings: 71 Survey date:TUESDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 26 NY-03-A-11PRIVATE HOUSINGNORTH YORKSHIRE HORSEFAIR BOROUGHBRIDGE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 23 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 27 SC-03-A-04 DETACHED &SURREY TERRACED HIGH ROAD BYFLEET Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 71 Survey date:THURSDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 28 SC-03-A-05 MIXED HOUSESSURREY REIGATE ROAD HORLEY Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 207 Survey date:MONDAY ######## Survey Type:MANUAL 29 SF-03-A-05 DETACHED HOUSESSUFFOLK VALE LANE BURY ST EDMUNDS Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 18 Survey date:WEDNESDAY######## Survey Type:MANUAL 30 SH-03-A-05SEMI-DETACHED/TERRACEDSHROPSHIRE SANDCROFT SUTTON HILL TELFORD Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 54 Survey date:THURSDAY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport-And-Development-Study
    Appendix A – Novartis Brighton University (Horsham Town South of Parsonage Road) Trip Generation Analysis Brighton University, Novartis site at Horsham Vehicular Trip Generation Comparison University TRICS selections AM PM Daily All edge of town centre sites in default date range in GB excluding site at Fort William as pop within 5 miles under 25000 Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Rate 0.042 0.012 0.054 0.009 0.019 0.028 0.147 0.15 0.297 Students 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 Trips 144.9 41.4 186.4 31.1 65.6 96.6 507.3 517.7 1024.9 Student accommodation AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Edge of Town centre in GB Rate 0.014 0.01 0.024 0.014 0.014 0.028 0.189 0.201 0.39 Students 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 Trips 18.5 13.2 31.7 18.5 18.5 36.9 249.3 265.1 514.4 Industrial AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Suburban sites over 50 employees in GB Rate 0.074 0.03 0.104 0.017 0.077 0.094 0.685 0.74 1.425 (no edge of town centre site with 50 employees Jobs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 available within TRICS database) Trips 37.0 15.0 52.0 8.5 38.5 47.0 342.5 370.0 712.5 Office AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Edge of Town Centre over 100 employees in GB Rate 0.19 0.026 0.216 0.022 0.168 0.19 0.729 0.697 1.426 Local population with 5 miles under 500,000 Jobs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Trips 95.0 13.0 108.0 11.0 84.0 95.0 364.5 348.5 713.0 Previous Use: B1/B2 combined Trips 132.0 28.0 160.0 19.5 122.5 142.0 707.0 718.5 1425.5 Proposed
    [Show full text]
  • TRICS TRIP Rates Combined TRICS
    TRICS 7.7.2 250720 B19.45 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2020. All rights reserved Wednesday 26/08/20 Page 1 Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Reading Licence No: 706701 Filtering Summary Land Use 01/O RETAIL/CONVENIENCE STORE Selected Trip Rate Calculation Parameter Range 70-1200 sqm GFA Actual Trip Rate Calculation Parameter Range 70-400 sqm GFA Date Range Minimum: 01/01/12 Maximum: 25/09/19 Parking Spaces Range All Surveys Included Days of the week selected Wednesday 4 Thursday 1 Main Location Types selected Town Centre 1 Edge of Town Centre 1 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 1 Population <1 Mile ranges selected 20,001 to 25,000 2 25,001 to 50,000 2 50,001 to 100,000 1 Population <5 Mile ranges selected 75,001 to 100,000 1 250,001 to 500,000 3 500,001 or More 1 Car Ownership <5 Mile ranges selected 0.6 to 1.0 2 1.1 to 1.5 3 PTAL Rating No PTAL Present 5 TRICS 7.7.2 250720 B19.45 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2020. All rights reserved Wednesday 26/08/20 Page 2 Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Reading Licence No: 706701 Calculation Reference: AUDIT-706701-200826-0855 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS: Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : O - CONVENIENCE STORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST ES EAST SUSSEX 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST DV DEVON 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days WY WEST YORKSHIRE 1 days This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set Primary Filtering selection: This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Report
    Transport Report ST PETER’S PLACE, WESTERN RD, LANCING FEBRUARY 2020 PRODUCED for HAMILTON INVESTMENTS LTD [DOCUMENT SUBTITLE] PRODUCED by REEVES TRANSPORT PLANNING LTD SGR/SPP/111218 V5 www.reevestransportplanning.co.uk TRANSPORT REPORT ST PETER’S PLACE, LANCING CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Policy Context 3. Existing Conditions 4. Proposed Development 5. Transport and Traffic Impact 6. Parking Demand and Provision 7. Collision and Risk Assessment 8. Conclusions and Recommendation APPENDICES 1. Site Layout Plan 2. Local Bus Service Maps and Timetables 3. Southern Rail Network Map 4. TRICS Data Sheets 5. Swept Path Analysis 6. WSCC Residential Parking Demand Calculator 7. Sussex Safer Roads Partnership Collision Information 8. PBZ Ward Map 1 www.reevestransportplanning.co.uk TRANSPORT REPORT ST PETER’S PLACE, LANCING 1. Introduction 1.1 Reeves Transport Planning is appointed to provide a Transport Report in support of a proposed redevelopment at St Peters Place, Lancing, which is in the Adur District of West Sussex. A site layout plan is attached ta Appendix 1. 1.2 The proposal seeks to redevelop the existing garages and car breaker/repair site to provide 18 flats, with associated parking and turning areas that will be accessed via St Peters Place, Western Road. 1.3 This Transport Report is drafted with reference to West Sussex County Council’s guidance on the content of Transport Assessments and the Ministry of Housing’s, Communities & Local Government Guidance on Travel Plans, Transport Assessments and Statements, published March 2014. 2. Policy Background 2.1 This section of the Transport Report sets out the relevant policies, at a national and local level, that this proposal will be judged against.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use?
    TRICS. Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use? Research Conclusions. “Copyright Babtie Group Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Babtie Group Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Babtie Group Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Babtie Group Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Babtie Group Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Babtie Group Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Babtie Group Limited has been made.” 0002096 May 2004 Babtie Group Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 6GB Tel 01622 666083 Fax 01622 677784 TRICS. Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use? Research conclusions Contents Page 1. How has this research come about? 1 2. Investigatory steps undertaken. 2 3. Trend analysis results. 5 4. Factors not currently identified in TRICS. 11 5. Advice and considerations for the TRICS user.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Residential Travel Plans Work: Guidelines for New Development
    Department for Transport - Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Table of contents Making residential travel plans work: good practice guidelines for new development Foreword Contributors Introduction Achievements of travel plans About this guide 1. Residential travel plans - potential and policy context Potential of residential travel plans Policy context Strategic process 2. Travel plan design and content Objectives Guiding principles The travel plan pyramid Travel plan measures Site design 3. The process of requiring a residential travel plan Pre-application discussions The transport assessment Requiring a residential travel plan Consultation Evaluation Securing the travel plan through planning consent Specific mechanisms for ensuring delivery 4. Management, monitoring and enforcement Management The travel plan coordinator role Duties of the travel plan coordinator Monitoring and review process - 1 - Department for Transport - Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Enforcement and sanctions 5. Strategic framework Importance of the policy framework Policy framework Key policies 6. Concluding messages The emergence of residential travel planning Key findings Lessons for the future Appendix 1: summary case studies 1. New England Quarter, Brighton 2. Queen Elizabeth Park, Guildford, Surrey 3. High Royds, Leeds 4. Poole Quarter, Poole, Dorset 5. Plough Lane, Wimbledon, London 6. Grand Union Village, West London
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Assessment
    Marketfield Road, Redhill Transport Assessment david tucker associates t r a n s p o r t p l a n n i n g c o n s u l t a n t s Marketfield Road, Redhill Transport Assessment 27th April 2016 RJM/RD/15175-02a TA Prepared by: David Tucker Associates Forester House Doctors Lane Henley in Arden Warwickshire. B95 5AW Tel: 01564 793598 Fax: 01564 793983 [email protected] www.dtatransportation.co.uk Prepared For: Reigate & Banstead Borough Council © David Tucker Associates No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the prior permission of David Tucker Associates Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT 3 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework 3 2.2 Reigate and Banstead Core Strategy (2014) 5 2.3 Guidance on Transport Assessment and Circular 02/2013. 6 2.4 Surrey County Council Local Transport Plan 2011 – 2026 7 2.5 Manual for Streets (2007) / Manual for Street 2 (2012) 7 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 8 3.1 Existing Development 8 3.2 Local Road Network 8 3.3 Car Parking 8 3.4 Road Safety 9 3.5 Public Transport 10 4. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 12 4.1 Development 12 4.2 Parking 12 4.3 Site Access and Servicing 13 4.4 Travel Plan 14 5. TRAVEL DEMAND 16 5.1 Introduction 16 5.2 Residential 16 5.3 Retail A1/A3/A4 17 5.4 Cinema 19 5.5 Trip Distribution 22 5.6 Trip Estimates 23 5.7 Impact Assessment 24 5.8 Pedestrian Crossing Relocation 25 5.9 Shared Use path on Marketfield Way 25 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road Raglan Transport
    Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road, Raglan Transport Statement Revision A November 2017 We | Listen Create Deliver Project No: CS/093090 Doc Ref: CS/093090 Rev: Client: Monmouthshire County Council Issue Date: November 2017 Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road, Raglan Transport Statement Revision A Name Signature Date Author Stuart Bunston 05/10/2017 Checker Michael Lloyd 05/10/2017 Approver Paul Turner 05/10/2017 Issue Record Rev Date Description/Comments Author/Prepared by: Approved for Issue by: A 23/11/17 Traffic surveys / visibility displays Stuart Bunston Dave James “The report shall be for the private and confidential use of the clients for whom the report is undertaken and should not be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon by third parties for any use whatsoever without the express written authority of the Consultant” We | Listen Create Deliver Proposed Residential Development, Commercial in Confidence Chepstow Road Raglan Contents Transport Statement (Rev A) November 2017 Contents 1. Development Proposals 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Scope of the Study 1 2. Transport Evaluation 2 2.1 Existing Site 2 3. Public Transport 5 3.1 Bus and Rail 5 3.2 Pedestrian and Cycle Access 6 3.3 Collision Analysis 9 3.4 Trip Generation 9 3.5 Traffic Impact 11 4. National and Local policy 12 4.1 Policy Objectives for the Development 12 5. Transport Implementation Strategy 15 5.1 Parking 15 5.2 Site Access 15 6. Summary and Conclusions 17 Appendices Appendix A - Chepstow Road Site Boundary Plan Appendix B - Collision Data Appendix C - TRICS Data Appendix D - Traffic Flows Appendix E - Chepstow Road Potential Site Entrance i Proposed Residential Development, Commercial in Confidence Chepstow Road Raglan 1/ Development Proposals Transport Statement (Rev A) November 2017 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Committee Date: 26 January 2016 By: Director of Communities, Economy and Transport Title of Report
    Report to: Governance Committee Date: 26 January 2016 By: Director of Communities, Economy and Transport Title of report: Appointment of a Director representing East Sussex County Council on the Board of the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd - a Local Authority Trading Company. Purpose of report: To seek agreement to appoint Alex Jack to represent East Sussex County Council on the Board of Directors for the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd, in place of the current Director, Claire Warwick. RECOMMENDATION: The Governance Committee is recommended to appoint Alex Jack to represent East Sussex County Council on the Board of Directors for the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd on Claire Warwick’s resignation to the Board. 1. Background Information 1.1 TRICS Consortium Limited (TCL), a Local Authority Trading Company (LATC) owned by East Sussex County Council and five other County Councils in the South East has been trading since January 2015. In this first year TCL has operated effectively to the benefit of the Local Authority owners, each receiving a share dividend. 1.2 TRICS (Trip Rate Information Computer System) is a nationally and internationally recognised database used in Development Management Planning. Over 25 years it has become the industry standard in trip rate assessment for development. The creation of the LATC allowed the Authorities to retain tighter control of that shared database and exploit the commercial potential of the database. 2. Supporting Information 2.1 On 1 July 2014, East Sussex County Council’s Cabinet agreed that the County Council would be part of the new TCL, with our five partner County Councils (Dorset, Hampshire, Kent, Surrey and West Sussex).
    [Show full text]
  • Back Validation
    TRICS Back Validation Technical Report on Research “Copyright Babtie Group Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Babtie Group Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Babtie Group Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Babtie Group Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Babtie Group Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Babtie Group Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Babtie Group Limited has been made.” 0002096 April 2004. Babtie Group Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 6GB Tel 01622 666083 Fax 01622 677784 TRICS Back Validation Technical Report on Research Contents Page Number 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology to Calculate Trip Rates 3 3 Trip Rate Results 9 4 Factors not currently identified in TRICS 19 5 General Transport Trends 20 6 Land Use Changes 33 7 ‘Out of/into the Box’ Thinking 45 8 Conclusions 82 9 References 86 Appendices Page 126 -158 A Research Brief.
    [Show full text]
  • TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012
    TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012 TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012 Contents 1 Overview Page 1 2 Using the most up to date version of TRICS® Page 2 3 Understanding land use definitions Page 3 4 Site selection by region and data fields Page 4 5 The use of comment boxes Page 7 6 Understanding trip rate calculation parameter definitions Page 8 7 Using older TRICS data Page 10 8 Seasonal trip rate variation Page 11 9 Peak hours and days Page 12 10 Avoiding the production of predetermined “preferred” trip rates Page 14 11 Representative sample sizes & cross testing Page 16 12 Re-surveys and multi-surveys Page 19 13 Weighting factors in trip rate calculations Page 21 14 Trip rates and limits of extrapolation Page 22 15 Mixed use sites and TRICS Page 26 16 Understanding count type definitions Page 27 17 Correct presentation of trip rates and methods Page 29 18 The Standardised Assessment Methodology (SAM) Page 30 19 Summary Page 31 1 Overview 1.1 This TRICS® Good Practice Guide supersedes the 2011 guide. It is fully endorsed by the TRICS® Consortium, which consists of 6 County Councils (Dorset, Kent, East Sussex, West Sussex, Surrey and Hampshire). 1.2 The aim of this document is to provide guidance to users of TRICS® so they may undertake good practice when using the system. Version 2012(a)v6.9.2 of the software (released in March 2012) has been used in all examples given within the document. 1.3 TRICS® is a very powerful and flexible system, and allows great variation in the calculation of both vehicular and multi-modal trip rates.
    [Show full text]
  • TRICS Limited Business Plan 2014
    Annex 2 TRICS Limited Business Plan 2014 June 2014 SLS: 18.06.2014 Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. The TRICS Product 3. Market Analysis 4. Company Structure & Governance 5. Management, Company Administration and Support 6. Financial Analysis 2 1. Executive Summary TRICS Limited will be established to operate, manage and to fully exploit the commercial potential of a transport trip rate database (TRICS), upon the transfer of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), the associated trademark and website domain from a consortium of six local authorities, and a managed exit from the current service provider. The Company will provide a direct service to the transport planning and property development customer community by; • Maintaining a comprehensive trip rate database • Maintaining the professional and technical reputation of the database to secure the continued recommendation of the Department for Transport • The promotion of research into trip generation and transport related issues The Company will exploit the commercial potential of the database and the established reputation of the brand by; • The development and marketing of the product to reach new customers both within the existing UK market and in worldwide locations where the market and nature of travel is similar, for example in New Zealand and Australia. • The company will consider the business case for the continued development of a Travel Plan monitoring product that will run in parallel with the main database and which will be marketed to Travel Plan Officers within Local Authorities, private companies and transport consultants. 3 2. The TRICS Product The database was established in 1989 and originally named “Trip Rate Information Computer System”, the product quickly became known by its acronym TRICS.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 1033 Transport Assessment
    Our Reference : T2171/DW Your Reference : 29th October 2015 Mr R Maudsley Sunderland Peacock and Associates Ltd. Hazelmere Pimlico Road Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 2AG Dear Mr Maudsley, Land at Barrow Brook Enterprise Park Review of Highway Implications Further to your recent instructions, I confirm that I have undertaken an assessment of the proposed development comprising 14 industrial starter units (with a total GFA of some 4,065 sqm) at the above site with respect to potential transport/highways implications and set out my findings as follows. Background Whilst this is a previously undeveloped site, the access road (North Road) to the site has been provided from the roundabout on Hey Road/Holm Road which in turn provides access onto the A59 roundabout. With respect to recent planning history, there was a reserved matters application (ref 3/2007/1065) which was approved in February 2008 for part of the site. This followed an outline consent (ref 3/2002/0878) for a development comprising a total of 4662sqm of B1 office space. Whilst this consent has now lapsed, clearly this demonstrates that the principle of development at the site has been accepted and that the highways implications of such development have been appraised and also accepted. This previous consent is therefore the benchmark against which this application should be The Old Bank House 6 Berry Lane assessed. Longridge Preston PR3 3JA T: 01772 786066 F: 01772 786265 E: [email protected] www.psadesign.co.uk PSA Design Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 3880298, Registered Office as above Existing Conditions in the Vicinity of the Site As noted above, the existing access roads to serve the site have already been constructed (North Road), in the form of roundabout junctions onto both Hey Road/Holm Road and the A59.
    [Show full text]