DOCSLIB.ORG

TRICS Report 89/1 Traffic Generation Study of Offices & High Tech Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRICS 2007(a) List of TRICS Research Publications 06/05/07 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 Licence No: 500000 TRICS Report 89/1 Traffic Generation Study of Offices & High Tech Sites London Borough of Hillingdon The report contains detailed traffic count data for 12 offices and "High Tech" sites surveyed in 1988. The data was collected by a variety of survey techniques including roadside interviews, foyer interviews and employee interviews. The report contains traffic flows in and out of each site with associated parking accumulation. Additional data exists for some sites on modal choice. Trip length distributions (employment catchment) are available for all sites. The report covers 4 offices in Central Uxbridge, 2 "rural" office complexes, 2 offices in local centres, 2 industrial estates (traditional) and 2 high tech sites. One of the high tech sites was Stockley Park with 360,000 sq. ft. of development (150 pp). PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £100 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 89/2 Traffic Generation Studies Surrey County Council A detailed assessment of traffic generation from 2 superstores, 2 DIY stores, 2 business parks and 2 offices. Data was collected by counts and interviews. Additional data exists in the report on modal split to offices and catchment areas for each development. The report contains full details of traffic counts and parking accumulations at each site in half hour periods (180 pp). PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £100 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 89/3 Review of Parking Standards Surrey County Council The report reviews the parking standards for most land uses. Data from other authorities was compiled as a comparison. Maximum parking accumulation for different land uses was extracted from the TRICS database and some 60 "spot" surveys were undertaken to determine maximum parking usage. Detailed discussions with other highway authorities to review the problems of parking standards are reported. The report contains recommendations for revised standards (180 pp). PRICE: £50 to TRICS members £50 to non-TRICS members TRICS 2007(a) List of TRICS Research Publications 06/05/07 Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 Licence No: 500000 TRICS Report 89/4 Traffic Generation from Industrial Estates JMP Consultants Limited Based on surveys undertaken in 1984 at 60n industrial sites in England (21), Scotland (14), Wales (13) and Northern Ireland (12). The report establishes regression relationships for trip generation. Trips are subdivided by purpose (i.e. commuting, business and deliveries). The work was undertaken for the Scottish Development Agency, the Welsh Development Agency, the Northern Ireland Development Agency and English Industrial Estates. The report comes in two parts, firstly the analysis of data and secondly the establishment of a formal estimate procedure (130 pp). PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £60 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 89/5 Traffic Generated from Marinas Hampshire County Council The report sets out the traffic generation from three marinas (Agememnon Boat Yard, Bucklers Hard; Lymington Yacht Haven; Mercury Yacht Harbour, Hamble). Automatic traffic counters were established for 4 weeks throughout August 1988. Also, detailed parking accumulations were surveyed on one Saturday. The report contains details of the three sites and details of weather and tides (60 pp). PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £100 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 92/1 Assessment of Parking Demand JMP Consultants Limited This report compares parking demand ratios for land uses on the TRICS system. The land uses include food superstores, DIY superstores, retail parks, offices, business parks and general industrial. The report studies in detail traffic flow data from a total of 223 sites. The results produce a statistical analysis of each land use classification and give a maximum parking demand ratio for each individual site. PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £100 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 92/2 Traffic Implications of Sunday Trading JMP Consultants Limited The report concludes on the effect of the seven day trading patterns of seven food superstore sites throughout the Christmas period. The results are compared with data held for stores trading pre 1991. The sites included are Asda, Burgh Heath; Asda, Fareham; Sainsburys, Burpham; Sainsburys, Chichester; Sainsburys, Poole; Tesco, Bognor Regis; and Tesco, Hookwood. PRICE: £50 to TRICS members £80 to non-TRICS members TRICS 2007(a) List of TRICS Research Publications 06/05/07 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 Licence No: 500000 TRICS Report 93/1 Parking & Public Transport - The Effect on Mode Choice A study of B1 developments JMP Consultants Limited and SERPLAN The report analyses the result of surveys at 60 offices located throughout the Southeast Planners Region to determine the relationship between parking, public transport and modal choice. The study concentrated on the journey to work trip. PRICE: £50 to TRICS members £50 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 94/1 Long Term Changes in Superstore Traffic Generation JMP Consultants Limited This report analyses the basic assumption in the preparation of Traffic Impact Assessments that the aggregate level of traffic generated by a new retail development will be finite and static from the first year of opening until the store eventually closes or changes its trading position in some way. Average trip rate changes are calculated for all available data on the TRICS database. This is backed by significant testing. The additional customer flows are analysed, so illustrating the effects of local competitive changes. PRICE: £50 to TRICS members £80 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 95/1 Parking & Public Transport - The Effect on Mode Choice Additional surveys at B1 developments with constrained parking JMP Consultants Limited This report provides an addendum to 93/1 by looking at an additional 14 office sites located on the fringe of London and in other areas where on-site parking was heavily constrained. The results confirm the conclusions from the previous report which outlines the importance of the management of on-site parking space. PRICE: £25 to TRICS members £25 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 95/2 Pass By & Diverted Traffic - A Resume JMP Consultants Limited This report draws together the work that has been undertaken over the last 10 years on defining and quantifying "diverted and pass by traffic". An extensive bibliography is included. PRICE: £25 to TRICS members £25 to non-TRICS members TRICS 2007(a) List of TRICS Research Publications 06/05/07 Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 Licence No: 500000 TRICS Report 95/3 Traffic & Parking at Food Retailing JMP Consultants Limited and Safeway This report summarises the results of surveys undertaken at 9 food superstores in November 1994. 1,000 interviews were undertaken with customers at each store and this was supplemented by traffic counts. The report illustrates the effect of store location on modal choice, parking requirements, travel length and relationships with adjacent land uses. PRICE: £40 to TRICS members £40 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 95/4 Traffic & Parking at Food Retailing Appendices JMP Consultants Limited and Safeway This report contains detailed calculated results to support the summary tables presented in 95/3. PRICE: £100 to TRICS members £100 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 97/1 Transport Characteristics of Non-Food Retail Parks This report analyses the results of questionnaire-based surveys and pedestrian/vehicle counts undertaken at four non-food retail parks in Dorset, Kent, Lancashire and Surrey. Each of the parks was surveyed on a Friday, Saturday and Sunday in 1996 and the results provide a valuable insight into the transport and shopping characteristics of this land use. PRICE: £50 to TRICS members £80 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 99/1 Transport Characteristics of Foodstores at Retail Parks This report contains analysis of travel surveys undertaken at two foodstores in Staffordshire and provides information on travel by different modes, customer characteristics, use of the car parks, trip lengths and the level of primary trips. The results of the surveys are also compared with those from the earlier TRICS Safeway research (reports 95/3 and 95/4). PRICE: £25 to TRICS members £40 to non-TRICS members TRICS 2007(a) List of TRICS Research Publications 06/05/07 Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 Licence No: 500000 TRICS Report 99/2 Research into Trip Rate Variation This report explores the circumstances in which trip rates vary, using various data sources (including retail sales information as well as the TRICS database), and develops guidance on good practice in trip rate selection and use. The report also contains an examination of the relationship between parking supply and peak parking demand, which has important implications for the use of trip rates in estimating parking provision. PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £80 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 02/1 Relationships Between Accessibility and Parking for New Developments This report examines the variation in levels of parking provision within new developments, for example by public transport accessibility or location, and relevance to travel characteristics by mode. The broad objectives of the research was to explore the relationship between parking provision, accessibility and mode choice for new developments; examine how the level of parking influences and relates to the mode choice; provide advice on parking standards for new developments; and determine appropriate definitions of modal accessibility, appropriate for use in TRICS. PRICE: £60 to TRICS members £80 to non-TRICS members TRICS Report 02/2 Seasonality Research The objective of this report is to assist TRICS practitioners in identifying typical profiles of vehicle trip making throughout the course of a year for different types of land use. The research illustrates how traffic activity varies for different land uses by time of day, day of week, and month of year. During 2000, a total of 16 sites were identified for possible consideration, for which subsequently a full analysis was undertaken in 2001 for 8 sites.
Recommended publications
  • Transport-And-Development-Study

    Transport-And-Development-Study

    Appendix A – Novartis Brighton University (Horsham Town South of Parsonage Road) Trip Generation Analysis Brighton University, Novartis site at Horsham Vehicular Trip Generation Comparison University TRICS selections AM PM Daily All edge of town centre sites in default date range in GB excluding site at Fort William as pop within 5 miles under 25000 Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Rate 0.042 0.012 0.054 0.009 0.019 0.028 0.147 0.15 0.297 Students 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 3451 Trips 144.9 41.4 186.4 31.1 65.6 96.6 507.3 517.7 1024.9 Student accommodation AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Edge of Town centre in GB Rate 0.014 0.01 0.024 0.014 0.014 0.028 0.189 0.201 0.39 Students 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 1319 Trips 18.5 13.2 31.7 18.5 18.5 36.9 249.3 265.1 514.4 Industrial AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Suburban sites over 50 employees in GB Rate 0.074 0.03 0.104 0.017 0.077 0.094 0.685 0.74 1.425 (no edge of town centre site with 50 employees Jobs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 available within TRICS database) Trips 37.0 15.0 52.0 8.5 38.5 47.0 342.5 370.0 712.5 Office AM PM Daily Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Arr Dep 2-Way Edge of Town Centre over 100 employees in GB Rate 0.19 0.026 0.216 0.022 0.168 0.19 0.729 0.697 1.426 Local population with 5 miles under 500,000 Jobs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Trips 95.0 13.0 108.0 11.0 84.0 95.0 364.5 348.5 713.0 Previous Use: B1/B2 combined Trips 132.0 28.0 160.0 19.5 122.5 142.0 707.0 718.5 1425.5 Proposed
  • TRICS TRIP Rates Combined TRICS

    TRICS TRIP Rates Combined TRICS

    TRICS 7.7.2 250720 B19.45 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2020. All rights reserved Wednesday 26/08/20 Page 1 Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Reading Licence No: 706701 Filtering Summary Land Use 01/O RETAIL/CONVENIENCE STORE Selected Trip Rate Calculation Parameter Range 70-1200 sqm GFA Actual Trip Rate Calculation Parameter Range 70-400 sqm GFA Date Range Minimum: 01/01/12 Maximum: 25/09/19 Parking Spaces Range All Surveys Included Days of the week selected Wednesday 4 Thursday 1 Main Location Types selected Town Centre 1 Edge of Town Centre 1 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 1 Population <1 Mile ranges selected 20,001 to 25,000 2 25,001 to 50,000 2 50,001 to 100,000 1 Population <5 Mile ranges selected 75,001 to 100,000 1 250,001 to 500,000 3 500,001 or More 1 Car Ownership <5 Mile ranges selected 0.6 to 1.0 2 1.1 to 1.5 3 PTAL Rating No PTAL Present 5 TRICS 7.7.2 250720 B19.45 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2020. All rights reserved Wednesday 26/08/20 Page 2 Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Reading Licence No: 706701 Calculation Reference: AUDIT-706701-200826-0855 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS: Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : O - CONVENIENCE STORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST ES EAST SUSSEX 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST DV DEVON 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days WY WEST YORKSHIRE 1 days This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set Primary Filtering selection: This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range.
  • Transport Report

    Transport Report

    Transport Report ST PETER’S PLACE, WESTERN RD, LANCING FEBRUARY 2020 PRODUCED for HAMILTON INVESTMENTS LTD [DOCUMENT SUBTITLE] PRODUCED by REEVES TRANSPORT PLANNING LTD SGR/SPP/111218 V5 www.reevestransportplanning.co.uk TRANSPORT REPORT ST PETER’S PLACE, LANCING CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Policy Context 3. Existing Conditions 4. Proposed Development 5. Transport and Traffic Impact 6. Parking Demand and Provision 7. Collision and Risk Assessment 8. Conclusions and Recommendation APPENDICES 1. Site Layout Plan 2. Local Bus Service Maps and Timetables 3. Southern Rail Network Map 4. TRICS Data Sheets 5. Swept Path Analysis 6. WSCC Residential Parking Demand Calculator 7. Sussex Safer Roads Partnership Collision Information 8. PBZ Ward Map 1 www.reevestransportplanning.co.uk TRANSPORT REPORT ST PETER’S PLACE, LANCING 1. Introduction 1.1 Reeves Transport Planning is appointed to provide a Transport Report in support of a proposed redevelopment at St Peters Place, Lancing, which is in the Adur District of West Sussex. A site layout plan is attached ta Appendix 1. 1.2 The proposal seeks to redevelop the existing garages and car breaker/repair site to provide 18 flats, with associated parking and turning areas that will be accessed via St Peters Place, Western Road. 1.3 This Transport Report is drafted with reference to West Sussex County Council’s guidance on the content of Transport Assessments and the Ministry of Housing’s, Communities & Local Government Guidance on Travel Plans, Transport Assessments and Statements, published March 2014. 2. Policy Background 2.1 This section of the Transport Report sets out the relevant policies, at a national and local level, that this proposal will be judged against.
  • Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use?

    Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use?

    TRICS. Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use? Research Conclusions. “Copyright Babtie Group Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Babtie Group Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Babtie Group Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Babtie Group Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Babtie Group Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Babtie Group Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Babtie Group Limited has been made.” 0002096 May 2004 Babtie Group Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 6GB Tel 01622 666083 Fax 01622 677784 TRICS. Does Historic Site and Survey Data Remain Valid to Use? Research conclusions Contents Page 1. How has this research come about? 1 2. Investigatory steps undertaken. 2 3. Trend analysis results. 5 4. Factors not currently identified in TRICS. 11 5. Advice and considerations for the TRICS user.
  • Making Residential Travel Plans Work: Guidelines for New Development

    Making Residential Travel Plans Work: Guidelines for New Development

    Department for Transport - Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Table of contents Making residential travel plans work: good practice guidelines for new development Foreword Contributors Introduction Achievements of travel plans About this guide 1. Residential travel plans - potential and policy context Potential of residential travel plans Policy context Strategic process 2. Travel plan design and content Objectives Guiding principles The travel plan pyramid Travel plan measures Site design 3. The process of requiring a residential travel plan Pre-application discussions The transport assessment Requiring a residential travel plan Consultation Evaluation Securing the travel plan through planning consent Specific mechanisms for ensuring delivery 4. Management, monitoring and enforcement Management The travel plan coordinator role Duties of the travel plan coordinator Monitoring and review process - 1 - Department for Transport - Making residential travel plans work: guidelines for new development Enforcement and sanctions 5. Strategic framework Importance of the policy framework Policy framework Key policies 6. Concluding messages The emergence of residential travel planning Key findings Lessons for the future Appendix 1: summary case studies 1. New England Quarter, Brighton 2. Queen Elizabeth Park, Guildford, Surrey 3. High Royds, Leeds 4. Poole Quarter, Poole, Dorset 5. Plough Lane, Wimbledon, London 6. Grand Union Village, West London

  • Transport Assessment

    Marketfield Road, Redhill Transport Assessment david tucker associates t r a n s p o r t p l a n n i n g c o n s u l t a n t s Marketfield Road, Redhill Transport Assessment 27th April 2016 RJM/RD/15175-02a TA Prepared by: David Tucker Associates Forester House Doctors Lane Henley in Arden Warwickshire. B95 5AW Tel: 01564 793598 Fax: 01564 793983 [email protected] www.dtatransportation.co.uk Prepared For: Reigate & Banstead Borough Council © David Tucker Associates No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the prior permission of David Tucker Associates Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT 3 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework 3 2.2 Reigate and Banstead Core Strategy (2014) 5 2.3 Guidance on Transport Assessment and Circular 02/2013. 6 2.4 Surrey County Council Local Transport Plan 2011 – 2026 7 2.5 Manual for Streets (2007) / Manual for Street 2 (2012) 7 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 8 3.1 Existing Development 8 3.2 Local Road Network 8 3.3 Car Parking 8 3.4 Road Safety 9 3.5 Public Transport 10 4. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 12 4.1 Development 12 4.2 Parking 12 4.3 Site Access and Servicing 13 4.4 Travel Plan 14 5. TRAVEL DEMAND 16 5.1 Introduction 16 5.2 Residential 16 5.3 Retail A1/A3/A4 17 5.4 Cinema 19 5.5 Trip Distribution 22 5.6 Trip Estimates 23 5.7 Impact Assessment 24 5.8 Pedestrian Crossing Relocation 25 5.9 Shared Use path on Marketfield Way 25 6.
  • Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road Raglan Transport

    Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road Raglan Transport

    Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road, Raglan Transport Statement Revision A November 2017 We | Listen Create Deliver Project No: CS/093090 Doc Ref: CS/093090 Rev: Client: Monmouthshire County Council Issue Date: November 2017 Proposed Residential Development, Chepstow Road, Raglan Transport Statement Revision A Name Signature Date Author Stuart Bunston 05/10/2017 Checker Michael Lloyd 05/10/2017 Approver Paul Turner 05/10/2017 Issue Record Rev Date Description/Comments Author/Prepared by: Approved for Issue by: A 23/11/17 Traffic surveys / visibility displays Stuart Bunston Dave James “The report shall be for the private and confidential use of the clients for whom the report is undertaken and should not be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon by third parties for any use whatsoever without the express written authority of the Consultant” We | Listen Create Deliver Proposed Residential Development, Commercial in Confidence Chepstow Road Raglan Contents Transport Statement (Rev A) November 2017 Contents 1. Development Proposals 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Scope of the Study 1 2. Transport Evaluation 2 2.1 Existing Site 2 3. Public Transport 5 3.1 Bus and Rail 5 3.2 Pedestrian and Cycle Access 6 3.3 Collision Analysis 9 3.4 Trip Generation 9 3.5 Traffic Impact 11 4. National and Local policy 12 4.1 Policy Objectives for the Development 12 5. Transport Implementation Strategy 15 5.1 Parking 15 5.2 Site Access 15 6. Summary and Conclusions 17 Appendices Appendix A - Chepstow Road Site Boundary Plan Appendix B - Collision Data Appendix C - TRICS Data Appendix D - Traffic Flows Appendix E - Chepstow Road Potential Site Entrance i Proposed Residential Development, Commercial in Confidence Chepstow Road Raglan 1/ Development Proposals Transport Statement (Rev A) November 2017 1.
  • Governance Committee Date: 26 January 2016 By: Director of Communities, Economy and Transport Title of Report

    Governance Committee Date: 26 January 2016 By: Director of Communities, Economy and Transport Title of Report

    Report to: Governance Committee Date: 26 January 2016 By: Director of Communities, Economy and Transport Title of report: Appointment of a Director representing East Sussex County Council on the Board of the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd - a Local Authority Trading Company. Purpose of report: To seek agreement to appoint Alex Jack to represent East Sussex County Council on the Board of Directors for the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd, in place of the current Director, Claire Warwick. RECOMMENDATION: The Governance Committee is recommended to appoint Alex Jack to represent East Sussex County Council on the Board of Directors for the Trip Rate Information Computer System Consortium Ltd on Claire Warwick’s resignation to the Board. 1. Background Information 1.1 TRICS Consortium Limited (TCL), a Local Authority Trading Company (LATC) owned by East Sussex County Council and five other County Councils in the South East has been trading since January 2015. In this first year TCL has operated effectively to the benefit of the Local Authority owners, each receiving a share dividend. 1.2 TRICS (Trip Rate Information Computer System) is a nationally and internationally recognised database used in Development Management Planning. Over 25 years it has become the industry standard in trip rate assessment for development. The creation of the LATC allowed the Authorities to retain tighter control of that shared database and exploit the commercial potential of the database. 2. Supporting Information 2.1 On 1 July 2014, East Sussex County Council’s Cabinet agreed that the County Council would be part of the new TCL, with our five partner County Councils (Dorset, Hampshire, Kent, Surrey and West Sussex).
  • Back Validation

    Back Validation

    TRICS Back Validation Technical Report on Research “Copyright Babtie Group Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Babtie Group Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Babtie Group Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Babtie Group Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Babtie Group Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Babtie Group Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Babtie Group Limited has been made.” 0002096 April 2004. Babtie Group Miller House, Lower Stone Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 6GB Tel 01622 666083 Fax 01622 677784 TRICS Back Validation Technical Report on Research Contents Page Number 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology to Calculate Trip Rates 3 3 Trip Rate Results 9 4 Factors not currently identified in TRICS 19 5 General Transport Trends 20 6 Land Use Changes 33 7 ‘Out of/into the Box’ Thinking 45 8 Conclusions 82 9 References 86 Appendices Page 126 -158 A Research Brief.
  • Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation

    Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation

    Local Plan Preferred Scenario Transport Assessment Horsham Transport Study Appendix F TRICS Trip Rate Derivation TRICS 7.7.3 Trip Rate Parameter:No of Dwellings TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS: Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED TOTAL VEHICLES Selected regions and areas: 2 SOUTH EAST ES EAST SUSSEX3 days EX ESSEX 1 days HC HAMPSHIRE2 days HF HERTFORDSHIRE1 days KC KENT 2 days SC SURREY 2 days WS WEST SUSSEX5 days 3 SOUTH WEST DC DORSET 1 days SM SOMERSET 1 days 4 EAST ANGLIA NF NORFOLK 8 days SF SUFFOLK 1 days 5 EAST MIDLANDS DS DERBYSHIRE1 days 6 WEST MIDLANDS SH SHROPSHIRE2 days ST STAFFORDSHIRE2 days WK WARWICKSHIRE2 days 7 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NE NORTH EAST1 LINCOLNSHIREdays NY NORTH YORKSHIRE2 days 8 NORTH WEST CH CHESHIRE 2 days LC LANCASHIRE1 days 9 NORTH DH DURHAM 1 days This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set Primary Filtering selection: This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation. Parameter:No of Dwellings Actual Range:10 to 984 (units: ) Range Selected300 byto 3000User: (units: ) Public Transport Provision: Selection by:Include all surveys Date Range:01/01/12 to 19/11/19 This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation. Selected survey days: Monday 8 days Tuesday 7 days Wednesday11 days Thursday 9 days Friday 5 days Sunday 1 days This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.
  • TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012

    TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012

    TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012 TRICS® Good Practice Guide 2012 Contents 1 Overview Page 1 2 Using the most up to date version of TRICS® Page 2 3 Understanding land use definitions Page 3 4 Site selection by region and data fields Page 4 5 The use of comment boxes Page 7 6 Understanding trip rate calculation parameter definitions Page 8 7 Using older TRICS data Page 10 8 Seasonal trip rate variation Page 11 9 Peak hours and days Page 12 10 Avoiding the production of predetermined “preferred” trip rates Page 14 11 Representative sample sizes & cross testing Page 16 12 Re-surveys and multi-surveys Page 19 13 Weighting factors in trip rate calculations Page 21 14 Trip rates and limits of extrapolation Page 22 15 Mixed use sites and TRICS Page 26 16 Understanding count type definitions Page 27 17 Correct presentation of trip rates and methods Page 29 18 The Standardised Assessment Methodology (SAM) Page 30 19 Summary Page 31 1 Overview 1.1 This TRICS® Good Practice Guide supersedes the 2011 guide. It is fully endorsed by the TRICS® Consortium, which consists of 6 County Councils (Dorset, Kent, East Sussex, West Sussex, Surrey and Hampshire). 1.2 The aim of this document is to provide guidance to users of TRICS® so they may undertake good practice when using the system. Version 2012(a)v6.9.2 of the software (released in March 2012) has been used in all examples given within the document. 1.3 TRICS® is a very powerful and flexible system, and allows great variation in the calculation of both vehicular and multi-modal trip rates.
  • TRICS Limited Business Plan 2014

    TRICS Limited Business Plan 2014

    Annex 2 TRICS Limited Business Plan 2014 June 2014 SLS: 18.06.2014 Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. The TRICS Product 3. Market Analysis 4. Company Structure & Governance 5. Management, Company Administration and Support 6. Financial Analysis 2 1. Executive Summary TRICS Limited will be established to operate, manage and to fully exploit the commercial potential of a transport trip rate database (TRICS), upon the transfer of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), the associated trademark and website domain from a consortium of six local authorities, and a managed exit from the current service provider. The Company will provide a direct service to the transport planning and property development customer community by; • Maintaining a comprehensive trip rate database • Maintaining the professional and technical reputation of the database to secure the continued recommendation of the Department for Transport • The promotion of research into trip generation and transport related issues The Company will exploit the commercial potential of the database and the established reputation of the brand by; • The development and marketing of the product to reach new customers both within the existing UK market and in worldwide locations where the market and nature of travel is similar, for example in New Zealand and Australia. • The company will consider the business case for the continued development of a Travel Plan monitoring product that will run in parallel with the main database and which will be marketed to Travel Plan Officers within Local Authorities, private companies and transport consultants. 3 2. The TRICS Product The database was established in 1989 and originally named “Trip Rate Information Computer System”, the product quickly became known by its acronym TRICS.