One Generalist Or Several Specialist Species?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One Generalist Or Several Specialist Species? 1 2 3 4 Article type : Original Article 5 6 7 AID: 12307 8 9 ED: Karsten Schonrogge 10 AE: Gavin Broad 11 12 One generalist or several specialist species? Wide host range and diverse manipulations of 13 the hosts’ web building behaviour in the true spider parasitoid Zatypota kauros 14 (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) 15 16 Running title: One generalist or several specialist species? 17 18 Stanislav Korenko*1, Tamara Spasojevic2,3, Stano Pekár4, Gimme. H. Walter5, Vlasta 19 Korenková6, Kateřina Hamouzová1, Michaela Kolářová1, Kristýna Kysilková1, Seraina 20 Klopfstein2,3 21 22 1 Department of Agroecology and Biometeorology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural 23 Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague 6, Suchdol, 24 Czech Republic 25 2 Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Abteilung Wirbellose Tiere, Bernastr. 15, CH-3005 Bern, 26 Switzerland 3 27 Institute of EcologyAuthor Manuscript and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstr. 6, CH-3012 Bern, 28 Switzerland This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/icad.12307 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 29 4 Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 30 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic 31 5 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia 32 6 Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 33 20 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic 34 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 35 Abstract 36 1. Parasitoid wasps of the Polysphincta genus-group are highly specialised on their spider 37 hosts, and most of them are known to manipulate their hosts into building a special web in 38 which the parasitoid pupates. Trophic niche and the plasticity of host use were investigated 39 in the koinobiont parasitoid Zatypota kauros Gauld from Queensland, Australia. 40 2. We found that Z. kauros attacks spider hosts from different families, each differing widely 41 in their web-building behaviours, which makes it unique in the breadth of its host range. 42 Molecular analyses revealed that the taxon Zatypota kauros contains three divergent 43 mitochondrial lineages. Lineage A was associated exclusively with spiders of the genus 44 Anelosimus (Theridiidae), which builds tangle webs; lineage B was associated with the genus 45 Cyrtophora (Araneidae), which weaves tent webs; and lineage C was associated with a broad 46 range of hosts, including spiders of both the families Araneidae and Theridiidae. Unique host 47 manipulations could be observed in the web-building behaviours of the different host 48 groups. However, nuclear data from two ribosomal genes and three introns did not add any 49 support to the existence of different evolutionary lineages, nor did they coincide with the 50 different host groups. 51 3. The partial correspondence of mitochondrial lineage and host use, together with an 52 apparent mito-nuclear conflict might indicate maternal effects or very recent and/or 53 incomplete speciation in this taxon. Given their wide host range and intriguing interactions 54 with their hosts, the Z. kauros complex represents a promising system for studying parasitoid 55 specialization and its potential impact on speciation. 56 57 Keywords: behaviouralAuthor Manuscript manipulation – co-evolution – interactions – koinobionts – speciation 58 – silk– wasp – web architecture 59 60 Introduction This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 61 Understanding speciation is a major goal of evolutionary ecologists, but the processes 62 driving it remain poorly understood in most groups. This is also the case in insect parasitoids, 63 which have received only limited attention in speciation research (but see, e.g., Shaw, 2002; 64 Forbes et al., 2009; König et al., 2015), despite them constituting more than 5% of all 65 described species of multicellular organisms (Vié et al., 2009; Aguiar et al., 2013). Applying 66 ecological speciation theory (Schluter, 2009) to parasitoids, one would assume that the 67 major mechanisms associated with speciation are shifts in host-ranges and/or in the degree 68 of specialisation (e.g., Shaw, 2002). Unfortunately, detailed studies of the evolution of host 69 ranges in parasitoids are hampered by a lack of knowledge on the phylogeny of closely- 70 related species and on their host relations (even though there are notable exceptions, e.g., 71 (Shaw & Horstmann, 1997; Kankare et al., 2005; Tschopp et al., 2013). 72 The order Hymenoptera contains the most diversified parasitoids, both taxonomically 73 and ecologically (Eggleton & Belshaw, 1992). Some parasitoid species have been reported to 74 have wide host ranges which encompass insects or spiders from different families or even 75 orders, while other groups are much more specialized and have rather narrow host ranges 76 (Godfray, 1994, Yu et al., 2012). As a rule of thumb, the longer-lasting the association 77 between a parasitoid larva and its host, the higher the degree of specialization: species that 78 allow their hosts to continue their development, so-called koinobionts, tend to be more 79 specialized than idiobionts, which stop host development at the time of parasitization 80 (Althoff, 2003). 81 The Polysphincta genus-group (sensu Gauld & Dubois, 2006) (Ichneumonidae, 82 Pimplinae, Ephialtini) consists exclusively of koinobiont ectoparasitoids of spiders. Female 83 wasps of this group attach their eggs externally onto the opisthosoma or prosoma of spiders, 84 where the larvae manage to remain through several moult cycles of their hosts (Nielsen, 85 1923; Eberhard, 2000; Korenko et al., 2014). This strategy probably evolved from species 86 that feed, as larvae, on spider eggs, and the transition from egg mass scavengers to true 87 parasitoids of spiders probably occurred in a species that attacked the female of a hunter 88 spider species guarding its egg sac (Dubois et al., 2002; Gauld et al., 2002; Matsumoto, 89 2016). Author Manuscript 90 Polysphinctines are described as highly host-specific (e.g. Fitton et al., 1987; 91 Matsumoto, 2016) and exhibit a unique mode of host utilisation, including complex 92 behavioural repertoires (e.g. Eberhard, 2000; Matsumoto, 2009; Takasuka et al., 2017; This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 93 Messas et al. 2017; Korenko et al., 2018). Behavioural adaptations such as host manipulation 94 probably evolved through intimate interaction with the host behaviour and presumably 95 resulted in the restricted host ranges and high specificity of mutual interaction between 96 parasitoids and their spider hosts. Even though polysphinctines as a whole are associated 97 with spiders from different taxonomic groups utilizing different foraging techniques, the host 98 spectrum of a particular wasp species is usually restricted to a small group of taxonomically 99 closely-related species with similar behaviours. In all the species for which sufficient data are 100 available, the hosts always belong strictly to a single family (Fitton et al., 1987; Korenko et 101 al., 2011). The only exception is the recently studied Hymenoepimecis japi Loffredo & 102 Penteado-Dias, which is associated with orb-web building spiders from two families 103 (Araneidae and Tetragnathidae) (Messas et al., 2017). 104 The final instar larvae of polysphinctines have evolved an ability to manipulate the 105 web-spinning behaviour of the spider host shortly before the wasp pupates. They cause the 106 spider to construct a modified web structure enabling the wasp pupa to complete its 107 development in safe conditions (Kloss et al., 2016). Two different strategies can be 108 identified. In the first, the spider host is forced to build an additional or completely new, 109 three-dimensional silk barrier as a shelter for the wasp pupa (Matsumoto, 2009; Korenko & 110 Pekár, 2011; Korenko, et al., 2014). In the second, the manipulated spider reduces the 111 normal web to a simple and sparse, but strong silk construction (Eberhard, 2000; Eberhard, 112 2001; Korenko et al., 2015a; Kloss et al., 2016; Takasuka et al., 2015, 2017). These 113 modifications of the web structure into a more persistent cocoon web ascertain that the 114 wasp can pupate safely after the spider’s death (e.g. Kloss et al. 2016; Takasuka et al., 2015). 115 The type of behavioural manipulation in the spider host varies among groups and has to be 116 seen in connection to the spiders’ normal web building behaviour (e.g. Gonzaga et al., 2015). 117 Several studies have described behavioural manipulations of web-building spiders by 118 polysphinctine parasitoids from all over the world (Eberhard, 2000; Gonzaga et al., 2015; 119 Matsumoto, 2009; Korenko & Pekár, 2011; Korenko, 2016; Kloss et al., 2016; Takasuka et al., 120 2015, 2017). However, no such study was ever conducted in Australia, where 18 species of 121 the Polysphincta genusAuthor Manuscript -group have been reported to occur (Gauld, 1984). Certainly, this 122 number will increase given that several undescribed species are already known. Until now, 123 nothing was known about their ecology, including host association and behaviour. Here, we 124 describe for the first time host-parasitoid interactions in Zatypota kauros Gauld, an endemic This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 125 species in Australia. We focus on the host range of this parasitoid and on the behavioural 126 manipulations induced by the final instar larvae in their spider hosts, and find surprising 127 variability in both. By a combination of behavioural and molecular analyses, we investigate 128 whether the taxon currently known as Z. kauros represents a single, polyphagous and 129 behaviourally plastic species, or whether it constitutes a complex of more specialized 130 lineages. 131 132 Materials and methods 133 Field sampling 134 The host spectrum of Z.
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae) from Ecuador, French Guiana, and Peru, with an Identification Key to the World Species
    ZooKeys 935: 57–92 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.935.50492 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Seven new species of spider-attacking Hymenoepimecis Viereck (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae) from Ecuador, French Guiana, and Peru, with an identification key to the world species Diego Galvão de Pádua1, Ilari Eerikki Sääksjärvi2, Ricardo Ferreira Monteiro3, Marcio Luiz de Oliveira1 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Av. André Araújo, 2936, Petrópolis, 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil 2 Biodiversity Unit, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FIN-20014, Turku, Finland 3 Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, Depto. de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-971, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Corresponding author: Diego Galvão de Pádua ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Santos | Received 27 January 2020 | Accepted 20 March 2020 | Published 21 May 2020 http://zoobank.org/3540FBBB-2B87-4908-A2EF-017E67FE5604 Citation: Pádua DG, Sääksjärvi IE, Monteiro RF, Oliveira ML (2020) Seven new species of spider-attacking Hymenoepimecis Viereck (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae) from Ecuador, French Guiana, and Peru, with an identification key to the world species. ZooKeys 935: 57–92.https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.935.50492 Abstract Seven new species of Hymenoepimecis Viereck are described from Peruvian Andes and Amazonia, French Guiana and Ecuador: H. andina Pádua & Sääksjärvi, sp. nov., H. castilloi Pádua & Sääksjärvi, sp. nov., H. dolichocarinata Pádua & Sääksjärvi, sp. nov., H. ecuatoriana Pádua & Sääksjärvi, sp. nov., H. longilobus Pádua & Sääksjärvi, sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Top100amea.Pdf
    Editores / Editores José Luis Martín Esquivel Manuel Arechavaleta Hernández Paulo A. V. Borges Bernardo F. Faria Edición y financiación / Ediçao e financiamento INTERREG III-B BIONATURA Dirección General del Medio Natural, Gobierno de Canarias ARENA, Governo Regional dos Açores Direcção Regional do Ambiente, Governo Regional da Madeira Modo de citar la obra / Modo de fazer mençao a obra Cuando se hace referencia a la obra / Quando fazer refêrencia a obra: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). 2008. Top 100. Las 100 especies amenazadas prio- ritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Canarias. 500 pp. Cuando se hace referencia a un capítulo de la obra / Quando fazer refêrencia a um capítulo da obra: FARIA, B. F., C. ABREU, A. F. AGUIAR, J. AUGUSTO, R. JARDIM, C. LOBO, P. OLIVEIRA & D. TEIXEIRA. 2008. La perspectiva archipe- lágica: Madeira. En: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). Top 100. Las 100 especies ame- nazadas prioritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Canarias. pp.: 109-128. Cuando se hace referencia a una ficha de especie /Quando fazer refêrencia a uma ficha de espécie: MARTINS, M., M. MOURA & L. SILVA. 2008. Azorina vidalii (H.C. Watson) Feer. En: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). Top 100. Las 100 especies amenazadas prioritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Ca- narias.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Linyphiidae
    1 Advances in the systematics of the spider genus Troglohyphantes (Araneae, 2 Linyphiidae) 3 4 Marco Isaia1 *, Stefano Mammola1, Paola Mazzuca2, Miquel A. Arnedo2 & Paolo Pantini3 5 6 1) Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Università di Torino. Via Accademia 7 Albertina, 13. I-10123 Torino, Italy. 8 2) Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences & Biodiversity 9 Research Institute, Universitat de Barcelona. Av. Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Catalonia, Spain. 10 3) Museo civico di Scienze Naturali “E. Caffi”. Piazza Cittadella, 10. I-24129 Bergamo, Italy. 11 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 12 13 Running title: Advances in Troglohyphantes systematics 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ABSTRACT 23 With 128 described species and 5 subspecies, the spider genus Troglohyphantes (Araneae, 24 Linyphiidae) is a remarkable example of species diversification in the subterranean environment. In 25 this paper, we conducted a systematic revision of the Troglohyphantes species of the Italian Alps, 26 with a special focus on the Lucifuga complex, including the description of two new species (T. 27 lucifer n. sp. and T. apenninicus n. sp). In addition, we provided new diagnostic drawings of the 28 holotype of T. henroti (Henroti complex) and established three new synonymies within the genus. 29 The molecular analysis of the animal DNA barcode confirms the validity of this method of 30 identification of the Alpine Troglohyphantes and provides additional support for the morphology- 31 based species complexes. Finally, we revised the known distribution range of additional 32 Troglohyphantes species, as well as other poorly known alpine cave-dwelling spiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects Parasitoids: Natural Enemies of Helicoverpa
    Queensland the Smart State insects Parasitoids: Natural enemies of helicoverpa Introduction Helicoverpa caterpillars (often called heliothis) are serious pests of many crops in Australia. A range of parasitoid and predatory insects attack helicoverpa. Identifying and conserving these beneficial insects is fundamental to implementing pest management with a reduced reliance on chemical insecticides. This brochure describes the most important parasitoids of helicoverpa in Australian broadacre crops. Parasitoids versus parasites: What’s the difference? Parasitoids kill their hosts; parasites (such Figure 1. Netelia producta is one of the as lice and fleas) do not. All the insects most commonly encountered parasitoids in this brochure are parasitoids. Despite of helicoverpa. Females lay their eggs onto this difference, the terms parasitoid and caterpillars, and the hatching wasp larva parasite are often used interchangeably, if feeds on its host, eventually killing it. inaccurately. Parasitoids such as Netelia can be important biological control agents of helicoverpa in crops. (Photo: K. Power) All comments about parasitoid abundance in this publication are based on field observations in southern Queensland farming systems. These patterns may not occur in all parts of Australia. About parasitoids What is a parasitoid? How do parasitoids find their A parasitoid is an insect that kills (parasitises) hosts? its host — usually another insect — in Many adult parasitoids find their host by order to complete its lifecycle. In Australia, smell. They can detect the direct odour of helicoverpa are parasitised by many species the host itself, or odours associated with host of wasps and flies. All helicoverpa immature activity, such as plant damage or caterpillar stages are parasitised (that is, egg, caterpillar frass (dung).
    [Show full text]
  • Nauka Przyroda Technologie
    2016 Tom 10 auka rzyroda echnologie Zeszyt 1 N P T #3 ISSN 1897-7820 http://www.npt.up-poznan.net DOI: 10.17306/J.NPT.2016.1.3 Dział: Ogrodnictwo Copyright ©Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu MARTA RZAŃSKA1,2, HANNA PIEKARSKA-BONIECKA1 1Katedra Entomologii i Ochrony Środowiska Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu 2Zakład Biologicznych Metod Instytut Ochrony Roślin – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Poznaniu OGRÓD BOTANICZNY UAM W POZNANIU JAKO ŚRODOWISKO WYSTĘPOWANIA PARAZYTOIDÓW Z PODRODZIN PIMPLINAE I POEMENIINAE (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONIDAE) ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY BOTANICAL GARDEN IN POZNAŃ AS THE ENVIRONMENT FOR PARASITOIDS OF THE PIMPLINAE AND POEMENIINAE SUBFAMILIES (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONIDAE) Streszczenie. Badania wykonano w latach 2012–2013 w Ogrodzie Botanicznym Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Ich celem było poznanie struktury jakościowej zgrupowań parazytoidów z podrodzin Pimplinae i Poemeniinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) zasiedlają- cych rośliny na tym terenie. W badaniach wykorzystano 10 żółtych pułapek Moerickego, do których odławiano imagines Ichneumonidae. W latach 2012–2013 z terenu ogrodu pobrano 410 prób. Odłowiono 58 osobników należących do podrodziny Pimplinae, które oznaczono do 21 gatunków. Stanowiły one 15,9% fauny Polski oraz 28,2% gatunków wykazanych z Wielkopolski. Odłowiono także jeden gatunek Podoschistus scutellaris (Desv.), który należał do podrodziny Poemeniinae. W badanym środowisku stwierdzono dominację gatunku Pimpla contemplator (Muell.), który jest endoparazytoidem poczwarek Lepidoptera i Hymenoptera. Po raz pierwszy z Wielkopolski wykazano gatunek Piogaster albina Perkins. Słowa kluczowe: Ichneumonidae, ogród botaniczny, parazytoidy, Pimplinae, Poemeniinae Wstęp Na stan zdrowotny roślin rosnących w aglomeracjach wpływa wiele czynników. Do czynników biotycznych zalicza się organizmy szkodliwe, jak i pożyteczne, w tym owa- 2 Rzańska, M., Piekarska-Boniecka, H. (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    FINAL PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW (click the day) SUNDAY 08 MONDAY 09 TUESDAY 10 PROGRAM OVERVIEW (click the day) WEDNESDAY 11 THURSDAY 12 FRIDAY 13 31st European Congress of Arachnology Organisers: Hungarian Ecological Society and the Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences in co-operation with the community of Hungarian arachnologists Co-organising partners: Apor Vilmos Catholic College & European Society of Arachnology 8–13 July, 2018 Vác, Hungary Budapest, 2018 (version 24/VII) Edited by László Mezőfi and Éva Szita Organising Committee Ferenc Samu – chair Csaba Szinetár – co-chair György Dudás Róbert Gallé László Mezőfi Zsolt Szabó Éva Szita Tamás Szűts Natalija Vukaljovic Scientific committee Ferenc Samu co-ordinator Tamás Szűts co-ordinator Dimitar Dimitrov Marco Isaia Simona Kralj Fišer Wolfgang Nentwig Stano Pekár Gabriele Uhl Supporting Committee Zsuzsa Libor, AVKF rector – chair Ervin Balázs, director MTA ATK Zoltán Botta-Dukát, president MÖTE András Füri, director DINP Jenő Kontschán, director PPI, MTA ATK Yuri Marusik, director Russian Party Helpers Erika Botos, János Eichardt, Dániel Erdélyi, Katinka Feketéné Battyáni, Dávid Fülöp, Péter Kovács, Katalin Lehoczki, Teréz Márkus, Gábor Merza, Szilvia Mezőfi, Zsuzsanna Pál, András Rákóczi, Zsolt Szabó, Luca Török, Tamás Török, Violetta Varga, János Vígh The logo The 31st ECA logo, designed by Éva Szita, depicts the uloborid spider Hyptiotes paradoxus perching on the signal thread of its reduced orb-web. The typical triangular orb is framed by
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Strategies in Females of the Parasitoid Wasp Spalangia Endius: Effects of Mating Status and Size
    P1: VENDOR/GXB Journal of Insect Behavior [joib] pp476-joir-371890 May 1, 2002 16:4 Style file version Feb 08, 2000 Journal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 2, March 2002 (C 2002) Breeding Strategies in Females of the Parasitoid Wasp Spalangia endius: Effects of Mating Status and Size B. H. King1 Accepted October 29, 2001; revised November 28, 2001 Does the mating status or body size of a female parasitoid wasp affect her host size choice or propensity to burrow? In Spalangia endius, using smaller hosts appears to reduce a female’s cost of parasitization but not her son’s fit- ness. However, virgin females, which produce only sons, did not preferentially parasitize smaller hosts. Mated females also showed no host size preference. Mated females burrowed more than virgins in the presence of hosts, although not in their absence. Burrowing may reduce a mated female’s harassment from males, and not burrowing may increase a virgin female’s chance of mating because males avoid burrowing. Mating did not increase female longevity. Greater female size increased the offspring production of mated females bur- rowing for hosts but not in the absence of burrowing and not in virgin females. A female’s size had no significant effect on whether her first drill attempt was on a large or a small host or on the duration of her successful drills. KEY WORDS: breeding strategies; arrhenotoky; virgin; host size; body size; parasitoid. INTRODUCTION The evolution of behaviors is often described in terms of costs and benefits. Individuals are expected to behave in ways which maximize net benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key to the Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)
    Identification key to the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Gavin Broad Dept. of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Notes on the key, February 2011 This key to ichneumonid subfamilies should be regarded as a test version and feedback will be much appreciated (emails to [email protected]). Many of the illustrations are provisional and more characters need to be illustrated, which is a work in progress. Many of the scanning electron micrographs were taken by Sondra Ward for Ian Gauld’s series of volumes on the Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica. Many of the line drawings are by Mike Fitton. I am grateful to Pelle Magnusson for the photographs of Brachycyrtus ornatus and for his suggestion as to where to include this subfamily in the key. Other illustrations are my own work. Morphological terminology mostly follows Fitton et al. (1988). A comprehensively illustrated list of morphological terms employed here is in development. In lateral views, the anterior (head) end of the wasp is to the left and in dorsal or ventral images, the anterior (head) end is uppermost. There are a few exceptions (indicated in figure legends) and these will rectified soon. Identifying ichneumonids Identifying ichneumonids can be a daunting process, with about 2,400 species in Britain and Ireland. These are currently classified into 32 subfamilies (there are a few more extralimitally). Rather few of these subfamilies are reconisable on the basis of simple morphological character states, rather, they tend to be reconisable on combinations of characters that occur convergently and in different permutations across various groups of ichneumonids.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Polysphincta Group of Genera (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Pimplinae): a Taxonomic Revision of Spider Ectoparasitoids
    Systematic Entomology (2006), 31, 529–564 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00334.x Phylogeny of the Polysphincta group of genera (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Pimplinae): a taxonomic revision of spider ectoparasitoids IAN D. GAULD1 and JACQUES DUBOIS2 1Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, U.K. and 2UMR 5202-CNRS, De´partement Syste´matique et Evolution, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France Abstract. A cladistic analysis of the Polysphincta genus-group (¼ the ‘Polysphinctini’ of authors), a clade of koinobiont ectoparasitoids of spiders, was undertaken using ninety-six characters for seventy-seven taxa (sixty-five ingroup and twelve outgroup). The genus-group is monophyletic, nested within the Ephialtini as (Iseropus (Gregopimpla (Tromatobia ((Zaglyptus þ Clistopyga) þ (Polysphincta genus- group))))). Within the Polysphincta genus-group, the clade (Piogaster þ Inbioia)is sister-lineage to all other genera. The cosmopolitan genus Zabrachypus is nonmono- phyletic, and has been subdivided into a monophyletic Nearctic/Western Palaearctic Zabrachypus s.str. and an Eastern Palaearctic Brachyzapus gen.n., comprising B. nik- koensis (Uchida) comb.n., B. tenuiabdominalis (Uchida) comb.n. and B. unicarinatus (Uchida & Momoi) comb.n. An Afrotropical species placed in Zabrachypus, Z. curvi- cauda (Seyrig), belongs to Schizopyga comb.n. The monophyly of the cosmopolitan genus Dreisbachia is equivocal, and we consider that species assigned to it are best placed in an expanded Schizopyga (syn.n.). The monobasic Afrotropical genus Afrosphincta is also a synonym of Schizopyga (syn.n.). The newly delimited Schizopyga is the sister- lineage of Brachyzapus, and these two genera form the sister-lineage of Zabrachypus s.str. as the monophyletic clade (Zabrachypus þ (Schizopyga þ Brachyzapus)).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Pompilidae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio da Producao Cientifica e Intelectual da Unicamp JHR 46: 165–172 (2015) Paracyphononyx scapulatus (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae)... 165 doi: 10.3897/JHR.46.5833 SHORT COMMUNICATION http://jhr.pensoft.net Paracyphononyx scapulatus (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae), a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of Trochosa sp. (Araneae, Lycosidae) Hebert da Silva Souza1, Yuri Fanchini Messas1, Fabiana Masago2, Eduardo Fernando dos Santos3, João Vasconcellos-Neto1 1 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Rua Monteiro Lobato, 255, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 2 Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Insti- tuto de Biociências, Departamento de Farmacologia, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/n, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil 3 Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Rua Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazi Corresponding author: Hebert da Silva Souza ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Neff | Received 5 August 2015 | Accepted 18 September 2015 | Published 30 November 2015 http://zoobank.org/83B4CF20-1B29-4D7C-9203-F925181A419E Citation: Souza HS, Messas YF, Masago F, dos Santos ED, Vasconcellos-Neto J (2015) Paracyphononyx scapulatus (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of Trochosa sp. (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 46: 165–172. doi: 10.3897/JHR.46.5833 Abstract The genus Paracyphononyx Gribodo, 1884 (Pompilidae) contains species that act as koinobiont parasitoids of cursorial spiders. Here, we record a new parasitism interaction involving the pompilid wasp Paracypho- nonyx scapulatus (Bréthes) and the hunter spider Trochosa sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas and Social Spiders
    Tarantulas and Social Spiders: A Tale of Sex and Silk by Jonathan Bull BSc (Hons) MSc ICL Thesis Presented to the Institute of Biology of The University of Nottingham in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Nottingham May 2012 DEDICATION To my parents… …because they both said to dedicate it to the other… I dedicate it to both ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Sara Goodacre for her guidance and support. I am also hugely endebted to Dr Keith Spriggs who became my mentor in the field of RNA and without whom my understanding of the field would have been but a fraction of what it is now. Particular thanks go to Professor John Brookfield, an expert in the field of biological statistics and data retrieval. Likewise with Dr Susan Liddell for her proteomics assistance, a truly remarkable individual on par with Professor Brookfield in being able to simplify even the most complex techniques and analyses. Finally, I would really like to thank Janet Beccaloni for her time and resources at the Natural History Museum, London, permitting me access to the collections therein; ten years on and still a delight. Finally, amongst the greats, Alexander ‘Sasha’ Kondrashov… a true inspiration. I would also like to express my gratitude to those who, although may not have directly contributed, should not be forgotten due to their continued assistance and considerate nature: Dr Chris Wade (five straight hours of help was not uncommon!), Sue Buxton (direct to my bench creepy crawlies), Sheila Keeble (ventures and cleans where others dare not), Alice Young (read/checked my thesis and overcame her arachnophobia!) and all those in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences.
    [Show full text]