DOCSLIB.ORG

Movers and Shakers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Movers and Shakers Movers and shakers WOMEN’S STORIES FROM THE CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES Liz Gordon, Judith Sutherland Rosemary Du Plessis and Helen Gibson Movers and Shakers Women’s stories from the Christchurch earthquakes Women’s Voices Project - Ngā Reo O Ngā Wahine NCWNZ Christchurch Branch April 2014 Copyright © National Council of Women of New Zealand, Christchurch Branch ISBN 978-0-473-28563-0 Front cover photo taken by Ross Becker for the National Library https://natlib.govt.nz/blog/posts/photographs-after-the-canterbury- earthquakes and licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. Acknowledgements This project was undertaken in two parts. Our thanks go to the women who told their stories and the volunteer researchers in 2011-12 who attended training sessions and interviewed women about their earthquake experiences. We also wish to thank the University of Canterbury (UC CEISMIC Contestable Fund, UC Summer Research Scholarship, College of Arts internship programme, and other forms of support), Christchurch City Council (grant of $15,000) and Z energy (petrol vouchers for interviewers and participants) MDS Law and Altrusa International. The first stage of the project was also partly funded from the proceeds of the NCWNZ Christchurch Branch 2011 Suffrage Celebration. Thanks to Amanda England, UC Summer Research Scholarship Student 2011-2012 for her work on the project and, especially, to Rosemary Baird, who contributed her excellent skills as an oral historian in 2012. Many thanks also to Roberta Hill who enhanced our research committee during the first stage of the project. The Women’s Unheard Voices project was the second stage of the project. Our thanks go to everyone who assisted and participated - especially the women who told their stories and the considerable work that was once again undertaken by volunteer interviewers. We want to acknowledge the Christchurch Branch of the National Council of Women, the Ōtautahi Māori Women’s Welfare League and the Christchurch Branch of PACIFICA. These organisations participated in planning the research and collecting stories. The NCWNZ Christchurch was the co- ordinating organisation for the project, and we are grateful to its members for their support and to the National Office of NCWNZ for their administrative assistance. We wish to thank the Lottery Community Sector Research Grants Committee. Without your financial support we would not have been able to record the compelling stories of the women who were interviewed during the second stage of this project. We have been true to your goals – we have both enhanced the research capacity of our organisation and provided an enduring and inspiring account of women’s responses to the challenges posed by Christchurch earthquakes. An experienced social researcher, Brigid Buckenham, made a major contribution to the second stage of the project, identifying potential participants, liaising with community organisations, and conducting a significant number of interviews. Elizabeth Ashby, University of Canterbury Summer Research Scholarship student 2013-14, processed interview records, assisted with administration and conducted interviews. Rosemary Baird edited audio recordings and converted audio files for uploading on the UC CEISMIC website during 2013- 14. We want to thank them for the expertise and commitment they brought to the project. The UC CEISMIC team have ensured that most of the interview records are publicly available through the QuakeStudies digital archive. We are particularly grateful for the input of Lucy-Jane Walsh. We wish to once again thank all the women who agreed to tell their stories. You inspired us, made us happy/sad and made us cry. The resilience shown by the women of Christchurch in the face of thousands of earthquakes is remarkable.1 We would like to acknowledge our families, friends and supporters, without whom this research would not have proceeded so smoothly. Special thanks to Bruce Sutherland, who waited patiently as our Research Committee meetings stretched into the evenings, and who was endlessly supportive. Rosemary Du Plessis, Helen Gibson, Liz Gordon, Judith Sutherland. Women’s Voices Research Committee 1 Some research participants chose to use pseudonyms. Others chose to use only their given name. The full names of participants are only used with their consent. Contents Blame the earthquakes! 1 September 2010 3 Is it a monster? 4 A whole lotta shaking… 5 Is it a plane? Is it a train? 7 Legally Blind 8 “I prayed, I prayed, I cried, I cried” 10 Where is the earthquake located? 11 The flight response 15 Staying in bed 16 Standing in doorways 18 Saving the children 19 Shaking houses 22 September shaking 24 Earthquakes – “interesting and enjoyable!”. 25 A dark night 26 Radio waves 26 “All our neighbours began to come out in to the street” 28 After the earthquake 32 Communication 33 Surveying the damage 35 Evacuation 38 Further outcomes 45 Aftermath 46 The end of the beginning 55 The February quake: around the city 56 Premonitions 56 At work 59 Police, Fire, Civil Defence 62 Funeral Services 63 Panic in the City – Panic in the Suburbs 64 Christchurch Women’s prison (Templeton) 65 Spreydon/Latimer Square 71 Eastern Christchurch 72 The university 72 Waimairi Beach 74 The teachers and a stopwork meeting 75 Home and away 78 Out and about 91 Several people were in cars 95 At school 97 The February quake: counting the cost 99 Family 120 Loss and grief 123 Déjà vu all over again 127 June – the midwinter quakes 127 At work 131 Town and home 133 Anxiety 136 December 2011 138 Damage 141 Getting back home 141 Moving out, ready or not 144 Staying (with damage) 148 Damage in the community 151 Community responses 158 “Everyone just mucked in!” 159 Support from ‘On High’ 172 Communities pulling together 173 At Work 178 Organised Community Responses 180 ‘This huge jigsaw came together and it was perfect’ 180 “Flying stuff into the city” - the Rangiora Earthquake Express 182 The power of digital technology 183 The Farmy Army 184 People’s plight 185 Offers of help – “Everybody had something to bring to the table” 188 Meeting the needs 192 Housing and repairs 193 The Garden City? 198 Youth Contributions “Learning as you go” 201 SVA - “the whole thing just happened organically” 201 “Everyman and his dog would ring me” - the Student Volunteer Army 203 UNESCO Youth forums - “the youth vision for the city” 204 White elephant 206 The children - “Is there going to be anything for the kids?” 207 Changing communities - will the support keep coming? 211 Abandoned communities and looting 212 Leaving Christchurch and coming back 213 The state of the east ...it was so shocking! 215 Fragmented communities 217 Relentless uncertainty 218 Mixed blessings - frustrations and some surprising benefits 223 Grief - Spiritual support – “grieving for the community has been one of the hardest things” 232 Psychosocial support 234 Impressions and Expectations 235 Better communities 238 The powers that be: insurance woes 241 Under attack: Rana’s story 260 “Being strong for the children” 263 Immediate responses 263 Family life after the quake 264 Family difficulties 267 Effects on children 271 Family futures 277 Pets 278 Life, stress and families 279 “There was no blueprint to work from” - schools and churches 280 Schools, preschools and disruptions to education 280 Teachers’ stories 280 Early Childhood Education 286 Mothers’ stories 286 Parents’ involvement in their children’s schools 289 Students’ experiences of high school education 290 Changing schools – Ella’s story 292 The churches 294 Hubs 297 “It was a real nightmare” - the health impacts of the quakes 298 “Rocking and shaking” - Christchurch Public Hospital 298 “It is hard to make patients feel safe when you are petrified” - Princess Margaret Hospital 301 Health clinics and the quakes 303 Challenges for carers/health professionals 307 Damaged bodies – quake injuries 308 Layers of challenge – health issues in a quake context 311 Struggling to be normal – depression, anxiety and mental health issues 312 The many faces of health 318 “It’s such a strange time” - the effects of the quakes 319 East and West - two cities 319 Life-changing experiences – the good and the bad 323 Embracing the positive 323 The bad times 325 Feeling unsafe 327 Recovering 328 Feelings about others 329 Others are worse off 331 Financial impacts of the quakes 331 Others are worse off… or are they? 333 “A phoenix from the ashes” - Rebuilding Christchurch 335 A disorientating city 337 What we have lost - heritage buildings 339 Christ Church Cathedral and the Basilica 343 ReStart Mall and other CBD initiatives 346 What we have gained – the bright spots 348 A slow process 350 Not just the CBD – rebuilding homes 352 Businesses, jobs and the Christchurch economy 354 Optimism – looking forward 355 The city and its people 358 Conclusion 363 The final, final word 366 Appendix 1 367 Recording women’s experiences of the Christchurch earthquakes 367 Glossary 385 References 388 Movers and shakers Blame the earthquakes! How did this project come to be? Well, without the earthquakes there would be no project, so we might blame the earth-moving gods. On the 22nd April 2014, the Canterbury Quake Live website noted that there had been 14,083 felt earthquakes since the first ‘big’ one occurred early in the morning of 4 September 2010. Everyone in Christchurch has been affected in some way since that first major quake. At the National Council of Women’s first Christchurch meeting after the devastating 22 February 2011 earthquake, members raised questions about the need to record women’s experiences of the quakes and their aftermath. At the time, the media was full of recovery, demolition and rebuilding stories, but there was not much about looking after ageing parents, getting children to relocated schools across crumbling roads, or trying to juggle increased family and work responsibilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011
    THE MW 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT THE CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Sean Wilkinson Matthew Free Damian Grant David Boon Sarah Paganoni Anna Mason Elizabeth Williams Stuart Fraser Jenny Haskell Earthquake Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 47 - 58 Bastwick Street London EC1V 3PS Tel 0207235 4535 Fax 0207235 4294 Email: [email protected] June 2011 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REGIONAL TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING 6 3. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 12 4. NEW ZEALAND BUILDING STOCK AND DESIGN PRACTICE 25 5. PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS 32 6. PERFORMANCE OF LIFELINES 53 7. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS 62 8. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 96 9. ECONOMIC LOSSES AND INSURANCE 108 10. CONCLUSIONS 110 11. REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: DETAILED RESIDENTIAL DAMAGE SURVEY 117 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to the many individuals and organisations that have assisted with the EEFIT mission to Christchurch and in the preparation of this report. We thank Arup for enabling Matthew Free to attend this mission and the British Geological Survey for allowing David Boon to attend. We would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for providing funding for Sean Wilkinson, Damian Grant, Elizabeth Paganoni and Sarah Paganoni to join the team. Their continued support in enabling UK academics to witness the aftermath of earthquakes and the effects on structures and the communities they serve is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Gccrs Panel Bios
    GCCRS PANEL BIOS Alan Dallas CPEng CMEngNZ Alan was at an engineering forensics and seismic assessment seminar in the Christchurch CBD on 22 February 2011, subsequently serving as a CBD building assessor and team leader. He joined Batchelar McDougall Consulting (BMC) in August 2011 and has since worked on the assessment and repair of a range of buildings. Alan also flew to Kaikoura on 15 November 2016 to inspect buildings and bridges. Ana Pereira CPEng Ana is civil engineer with a geotechnical specialization, with over 10 years of experience in the geotechnical field. In Portugal, Ana was a site engineer managing construction of piles, micropiles and anchors for many different developments. These included residential and commercial buildings, roads and railways in different geological settings, including alluvial soils near waterways. She also managed several excavations for underground car parking in urban areas. Her experience in New Zealand, from 2012 onwards, is based on seismic hazard assessment, foundation, ground improvement design and slope stability analysis for residential and commercial buildings and bridges. Andrew Marriott CPEng CMEngNZ IntPE(NZ) Andrew has more than 30 years’ experience in structural and civil engineering, including designing a wide range of structures in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. He is currently a Principal and Director of Batchelar McDougall Consulting. Andrew has specialised in heritage engineering and temporary works designs as well as maintaining his competency in general structures ranging from residential through to multi-storey commercial developments. Andrew volunteered for Civil Defence as a Chartered Professional Engineer following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake and was lead engineer in the heritage area.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand
    FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 7 August 2013 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Freepost Parliament, Adams, Hon Amy Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 6831 Minister for the Environment Wellington 6160 (04) 817 6531 Minister for Communications Selwyn National [email protected] and Information Technology Associate Minister for Canter- 829 Main South Road, Templeton (03) 344 0418/419 bury Earthquake Recovery Christchurch Fax: (03) 344 0420 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Ardern, Jacinda List Labour Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9388 Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 472 7036 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 817 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6445 Ardern, Shane Taranaki–King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Auchinvole, Chris List National (04) 817 6936 Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9392 Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh National List Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 473 0469 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Banks, Hon John Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Leader, ACT party Wellington 6160 Minister for Regulatory Reform [email protected] (04) 817 9999 Minister for Small Business ACT Epsom Fax
    [Show full text]
  • Current Direction for Improving Structural Engineering and Resiliency in New Zealand
    CURRENT DIRECTION FOR IMPROVING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND RESILIENCY IN NEW ZEALAND Mike Stannard Chief Engineer Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment, New Zealand Abstract The 2010 to 2011 Canterbury Earthquake sequence has been the most destructive earthquake New Zealand has experienced in recent times. Rebuild costs are estimated at $40 billion or 20% of New Zealand’s GDP, 185 people died, and much of the Christchurch Central Business District, New Zealand’s second largest city, needs to be rebuilt. Approximately 170,000 houses have needed to be repaired or rebuilt and some eight thousand properties have been red zoned. It has been one of the most complex insurance events world-wide. While the social and economic consequences have been very significant and sometimes tragic, it has presented a real opportunity to learn from the event and better understand building and land performance during earthquake shaking. Generally modern buildings performed well from a life-safety perspective with New Zealand having been a leader in capacity design principles. However, plastic hinging, uncertainty about the residual capacity of buildings and poor ground performance have led to high demolition numbers. The New Zealand Government initiated a Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission of Inquiry after the February 2011 damaging event. Their final report presented 189 recommendations, providing an important direction towards improving structural engineering and resiliency. Changes are being made to structural design standards where under-performance has been observed. Earthquake-prone building legislation has been changed, requiring retrofitting or removal of the most vulnerable buildings throughout New Zealand. Reviews of the Building Code requirements are also underway which may test the societal appetite for changes to code settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Parliament's Legislative Response to Future National Emergencies
    Inquiry into Parliament's legislative response to future national emergencies To the Regulations Review Committee: This submission is from the Equal Justice Project. Contact: Joy Guo Maree Cassaidy [email protected] Members who have worked on this submission include: Keegan Browne, Rachel Hale Liam Johannesson, Anna Stevens Lucy Smith, Bryce Turner, Min Kyu Jung, Francy Sulikosky The Equal Justice Project is an independent student-run pro-bono initiative at the University of Auckland Law School. The objective of EJP is to promote equal access to justice by encouraging, organising and engaging in voluntary legal work in partnership with community groups, practitioners and academics. EJP has submitted on terms of reference 1, 3, 4 and 6 below. I (1) Consider the overarching principles governing the delegation of Parliament’s law-making powers in the context of recovery from a national emergency A Introduction Delegation of Parliament’s law-making powers in the context of recovery from a national emergency involves several competing principles. It is important to uphold and conform to these principles in order to prudentially legislate such power-conferring statutes. B Advantages The delegation of Parliament’s law-making powers has several positive factors that should be considered when assessing its necessity in the context of recovery from a national emergency. In particular, we can look to the powers delegated after the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake for a recent New Zealand example of the implications of such delegation. 1 Speed and Efficiency The primary advantage that comes with delegating Parliament’s law-making powers is speed and efficiency. In theory, speed is critical in emergencies; during the Christchurch earthquakes, there was a need to provide fast and decisive action unhindered by bureaucratic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet, Consectetuer Adipiscing Elit
    Movers and shakers WOMEN’S STORIES FROM THE CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES Liz Gordon, Judith Sutherland Rosemary Du Plessis and Helen Gibson Movers and Shakers Women’s stories from the Christchurch earthquakes Women’s Voices Project - Ngā Reo O Ngā Wahine NCWNZ Christchurch Branch April 2014 Copyright © National Council of Women of New Zealand, Christchurch Branch ISBN 978-0-473-28563-0 Front cover photo taken by Ross Becker for the National Library https://natlib.govt.nz/blog/posts/photographs-after-the-canterbury- earthquakes and licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. Acknowledgements This project was undertaken in two parts. Our thanks go to the women who told their stories and the volunteer researchers in 2011-12 who attended training sessions and interviewed women about their earthquake experiences. We also wish to thank the University of Canterbury (UC CEISMIC Contestable Fund, UC Summer Research Scholarship, College of Arts internship programme, and other forms of support), Christchurch City Council (grant of $15,000) and Z energy (petrol vouchers for interviewers and participants) MDS Law and Altrusa International. The first stage of the project was also partly funded from the proceeds of the NCWNZ Christchurch Branch 2011 Suffrage Celebration. Thanks to Amanda England, UC Summer Research Scholarship Student 2011-2012 for her work on the project and, especially, to Rosemary Baird, who contributed her excellent skills as an oral historian in 2012. Many thanks also to Roberta Hill who enhanced our research committee during the first stage of the project. The Women’s Unheard Voices project was the second stage of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraternallyfraternally Yours
    fraternallyfraternally yours What’s Inside: • Wellington Update • Rangiora 150th Celebration • Upcoming Events • Wanganui District Conference • Special Conference 2010 Grand Master’s Message Greetings to you all majority to go ahead with the consolidation. Well winter is now truly with us and I really do hope Lodges around the country are being asked to that you are all keeping warm and snug. consider consolidation and several have moved At this time of year I know that many of our to consolidate, while several more are discuss- members find it difficult to get out. I would hope that ing the proposal. When your lodge decides to members who are mobile during these winter days discuss the proposal, I hope you give it careful will keep our housebound members in mind and consideration. check if they can do anything to assist. I know that just a friendly phone call can sometimes be all that I look forward to meeting with you in the future. is needed. At the last Fraternal Council meeting in Napier, we Yours fraternally worked through a busy agenda and following the meeting the Council visited Loyal Peter Courtney Napier Lodge. The principal item Grand Master on the agenda for their meeting was consolidation on Society. After some lively discussion, it was agreed by an overwhelming August 2010 www.manchesterunity.org.nz Society Office Hours Mon-Fri - 8.00am - 4.00pm ti Fraternal Manager At the time of publishing Ian is currently overseas. No doubt he will supply us with a wonderful article/photos of his trip and attendance at the MU International Conference in Manchester and also the UK Order’s National Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law No 1 June Vol 2017 15 International and of Public Journal Zealand New
    NEW ZEALAND CENTRE FOR PUBLIC LAW Te Wānanga o ngā Kaupapa Ture ā Iwi o Aotearoa NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL PUBLIC OF AND INTERNATIONAL 15 VOL 1 NO LAW NZCPL OCCASIONAL PAPERS New Zealand Journal of 1 Workways of the United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2 The Role of the New Zealand Law Commission Public and International Law Justice David Baragwanath 3 Legislature v Executive – The Struggle Continues: Observations on the Work of the Regulations Review Committee Hon Doug Kidd 4 The Maori Land Court – A Separate Legal System? Chief Judge Joe Williams 5 The Role of the Secretary of the Cabinet – The View from the Beehive Marie Shroff 6 The Role of the Governor-General Dame Silvia Cartwright 7 Final Appeal Courts: Some Comparisons Lord Cooke of Thorndon 8 Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998 Anthony Lester QC 9 Terrorism Legislation and the Human Rights Act 1998 Anthony Lester QC 10 2002: A Justice Odyssey Kim Economides 11 Tradition and Innovation in a Law Reform Agency Hon J Bruce Robertson 12 Democracy through Law VOLUME 15 ▪ NUMBER 1 ▪ JUNE 2017 Lord Steyn 13 Hong Kong’s Legal System: The Court of Final Appeal Hon Mr Justice Bokhary PJ 14 Establishing the Ground Rules of International Law: Where to from Here? Bill Mansfield THIS ISSUE INCLUDES CONTRIBUTIONS BY 15 The Case that Stopped a Coup? The Rule of Law in Fiji Jonathan Boston Sarah Kerkin George Williams 17 The Official Information Act 1982: A Window on Government or Curtains Drawn? Timothy Endicott Dawn Oliver Steven Price Mark Hickford
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Extract
    EXTRACT FROM DIRTY POLITICS BY NICKY HAGER. PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY CRAIG POTTON PUBLISHING. CHAPTER 4 THE CRUSHER AND THE ATTACK DOG The attack bloggers’ point of contact in the National government, year after year, remained John Key’s office. But Cameron Slater had another close friend and ally in the government, Cabinet minister Judith Collins. They had much in common. One cultivated the iron woman persona of Crusher Collins, future prime minister, the other the reckless bully-boy persona of Whale Oil, crusading outsider. They were drawn together by right-wing politics and a shared attraction to aggressive and often petty attack politics. Slater was a devoted supporter of Collins, using his blog to promote her and to attack her critics. Collins, in return, fed a continuous supply of material to Slater: public press releases, political gossip, tip-offs and serious leaks. She boast- ed for him in 2013 that ‘you might not like it but Whaleoil is better informed and better read than any other news outlet or social media’.1 They talked often by phone, and in the evenings and weekends they chatted via Facebook. In work hours Collins e-mailed him directly from her sixth-floor Beehive office. Often their exchanges were about small events of the day. The following are typical of Collins’s messages: ‘You should whack these guys hard, they are truly pathetic’;2 ‘Cam, FYI. Another own goal for plughead’, her name for Labour MP Clayton Cosgrove;3 could he edit her Wikipedia page and replace an unflattering photo;4 and, forwarding a document, ‘I think I seri- ously annoyed certain people over it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Missed Chances
    A tale of missed chances The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission did not set out to apportion blame for the Canterbury Television building collapse, but several key parties will be uneasy at its findings. The commissioners pointed to errors and problems over many decades which contributed to a under-engineered building and flawed structure. The building collapsed when the magnitude-6.3 quake hit on February 22, 2011. It was a failure that caused the deaths of 115 people. It started with the design of the building and supervision of a relatively inexperienced struc- tural engineer. Further, the building should not have been issued a permit but pressure allegedly applied to consenting staff in the Christ- church City Council meant concerns raised were apparently ignored. The design flaws were missed by those building the CTV structure, and added to some non- conforming construction prac- tices not picked up by the absentee construction manager, fake engineer Gerald Shirtcliff. That alone makes for ‘‘grim and sobering reading’’, as Prime Minister John Key labelled yesterday’s report, but the most frustrating part was yet to come. In 1990, an engineer noticed the floors were not properly connected to the support walls. Here was something structurally wrong. The strengthening work was carried out in November 1991, nearly two years after the weakness was found, but not enough was done. The commissioners noted an opportunity lost: ‘‘It should have been apparent . that the report was not a full review of the struc- tural integrity of the building.’’ The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission report, which STEPS TO TRAGEDY is the result of an eight-week hearing by the commissioners, will be difficult reading for the Victims of the Canterbury Design Consent Construction Retrofit Inspection families of those who died.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Earthquakes on Apartment Owners and Renters in Te Whanganui-A-Tara (Wellington) Aotearoa New Zealand
    applied sciences Article The Impact of Earthquakes on Apartment Owners and Renters in Te Whanganui-a-Tara (Wellington) Aotearoa New Zealand Denise Blake 1,*, Julia S. Becker 2, Darrin Hodgetts 3 and Kenneth J. Elwood 4 1 School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka, Wellington 6012, New Zealand 2 School of Psychology, Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; [email protected] 3 School of Psychology, Massey University, Albany Auckland 0632, New Zealand; [email protected] 4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Apartment dwelling is on the increase in many cities in Aotearoa New Zealand, including those in earthquake-prone regions. Hence it is important that people working in disaster management and housing improve their understanding on how the living situations of apartment dwellers influence their disaster management practices. This knowledge is crucial for efforts to promote safety and preparedness. This paper explores what enables and constrains apartment dwellers in their ability to prepare for an earthquake. Eighteen people were interviewed who resided in Te Whanganui-a-Tara (Wellington) two years after the 2016 7.8 magnitude (Mw) Kaikoura¯ earthquake. Of central concern was people’s ability to prepare for disasters and access knowledge about building and structural safety and how this knowledge mattered to what apartment dwellers were able to Citation: Blake, D.; Becker, J.S.; prepare for. We found that the agency to prepare was dependent on whether people owned or rented Hodgetts, D.; Elwood, K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • USAR Engineering Response to the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake
    USAR Engineering Response to the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake Peter McBean, Wallbridge and Gilbert Consulting Engineers John L Wilson, Swinburne University of Technology Abstract This paper provides an overview of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake with particular reference to the Urban Search and Rescue operations. The USAR operations involved some 700 specialist personnel from New Zealand, Australia, Japan, USA, UK, China, Taiwan and Singapore, comprising Technicians, Engineers, Doctors, hazard experts and Police with search dogs. The USAR response lasted some four weeks and the paper describes the three distinct phases comprising; rescue, victim recovery and city/suburb safe operations. The Magnitude 6.3 Lyttelton earthquake struck within 10 kilometres of Christchurch CBD and caused massive damage to buildings and lifelines with some 184 confirmed deaths and a repair bill in the order of $15-20 billion dollars. AEES 2011 Conference 1. Earthquake Overview The Magnitude 6.3 Lyttelton earthquake struck within 10 kilometres of central Christchurch at 12:51pm on Tuesday 22 February, 2011 and caused massive damage and 184 confirmed deaths. This event was a severe aftershock of the Mn7.1 Darfield earthquake that struck on 4 September 2010, some 40 kilometres from the city centre. The city of Christchurch with a population of 350,000 people and 140,000 homes is located on an alluvial plain with around a 50 metre depth of fine silts, sands and gravels and a very high water table. The Mn6.3 event was essentially a ‘bullseye’ event that violently shook the city with peak ground velocities in the order of 400 mm/second and very high vertical accelerations in the order of 1.0g.
    [Show full text]