DOCSLIB.ORG

{Download PDF} Kitaj

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{Download PDF} Kitaj KITAJ PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marco Livingstone | 288 pages | 27 Oct 2010 | Phaidon Press Ltd | 9780714857510 | English | London, United Kingdom R. B. Kitaj - 22 artworks - painting Sandra Fisher. Aby Warburg. Brian Sewell. Andrew Graham-Dixon. Philip Roth. Edgar Wind. Lucian Freud. Frank Auerbach. Leon Kossoff. Richard Morphet. MJ Long. British Pop Art. The books and articles below constitute a bibliography of the sources used in the writing of this page. These also suggest some accessible resources for further research, especially ones that can be found and purchased via the internet. Panel discussion with Tracy Bartley, director of the R. Kitaj's career. Held at L. Louver, The architect MJ Long on her friendship with R. Curatorial overview of the R. Kitaj retrospective, R. Kitaj: Obsessions at the Jewish Museum. Cite article. Kitaj Artist Overview and Analysis". Updated and modified regularly [Accessed ] Copy to clipboard. Related Movements. Wikipedia article References Wikipedia article. Wikipedia: en. Kitaj Artworks. America Baseball R. Artists for Peace R. Dismantling the Red Tent R. The Ohio Gang R. Where the Railroad Leaves the Sea R. Apotheosis of Groundlessness R. Bather Psychotic Boy R. Desk Murder R. Do you know the country? If Not, Not R. La hispanista Nissa Torrents R. Mary Ann R. Marynka Smoking R. Portrait of Walter Lippman R. Synchromy with F. The Autumn of Central Paris R. The latter was included by Ernst Gombrich in his National Gallery exhibition and catalogue on Shadows so that Kitaj would have seen it two years before he left England for ever. In Kitaj exhibited his work Sandra Three, an installation of paintings, photographs and text that stretched across an entire wall of the gallery at the Royal Academy 's Summer Exhibition. Kitaj used the Academy's Summer Exhibition to showcase this sequence of works that dealt with the events of the "Tate War" and Sandra's death and even included a graffiti inscription stating 'The Critic Kills'. In , Kitaj was one of several artists to make a Post-it note for an internet charity auction held by 3M to celebrate the 20th anniversary of their product. He received the Golden Lion at the Venice Biennale in In October a major international symposium was held in Berlin to mark what would have been Kitaj's 80th birthday. It accompanied Obsessions , the first comprehensive exhibition of Kitaj's work since his death, held at the Jewish Museum, Berlin. The title is partly in reference to what he dubbed his "erratic Jewish obsessions". From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Ronald Brooks [1]. Chagrin Falls, Ohio , United States. Los Angeles , California , United States. Jewish Renaissance. The New York Times. Retrieved March 6, The Guardian. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 2, March 6, Retrieved November 9, The Independent. Китай – Уикипедия Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Ronald Brooks [1]. Chagrin Falls, Ohio , United States. Los Angeles , California , United States. Jewish Renaissance. The New York Times. Retrieved March 6, The Guardian. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 2, March 6, Retrieved November 9, The Independent. November 8, Kitaj — : Warburgian Artist', emaj issue 7. Ruskin dated June Royal Academy of Arts. Evening Standard. Retrieved March 1, Time Out London. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Desk Murder R. Do you know the country? If Not, Not R. La hispanista Nissa Torrents R. Mary Ann R. Marynka Smoking R. Portrait of Walter Lippman R. Synchromy with F. The Autumn of Central Paris R. The friendship and the shadow of betrayal R. Related Artists. Francis Bacon - Lucian Freud - Lourdes Castro born Frank Auerbach born Audrey Flack born Richard Smith - Nikias Skapinakis born Tom Wesselmann born Erro born He was a student at the Academy of Fine Art, Vienna in It was at the Royal College that he met David Hockney, who became a close friend. His first one-man exhibition was held at Marlborough Fine Art, London in In he returned to London. In Kitaj selected for the Arts Council of Great Britain a group of British works, connected by a common theme, which formed the core of an exhibition called The Human Clay. Kitaj's essay for the catalogue, in which he proposed the idea of a School of London , became one of the key art historical texts of the period. In he published the First Diasporist Manifesto , the longest and most impassioned of his many texts discussing the Jewish dimension in his art and thought. His various honours include election to the American Academy of Arts and Letters in In he became the first American since Sargent to be elected to the Royal Academy. He moved to Los Angeles in Further reading: Marco Livingstone, Kitaj , 2nd revised and expanded edition, London first published as R. Kitaj , Oxford Richard Morphet ed. Kitaj: A Retrospective , exhibition catalogue, Tate Gallery Read more. Ronald Brooks Kitaj ; October 29, — October 21, was an American artist with Jewish roots who spent much of his life in England. Spotted a problem? Let us know. Elaine Feinstein. Each month, Tate Etc. School of London was a term invented by artist R. Kitaj to describe a group of London-based artists who were …. Main menu additional Become a Member Shop. Китай - Wiktionary Dismantling the Red Tent R. The Ohio Gang R. Where the Railroad Leaves the Sea R. Apotheosis of Groundlessness R. Bather Psychotic Boy R. Desk Murder R. Do you know the country? If Not, Not R. La hispanista Nissa Torrents R. Mary Ann R. Marynka Smoking R. Portrait of Walter Lippman R. Synchromy with F. The Autumn of Central Paris R. The friendship and the shadow of betrayal R. Related Artists. Francis Bacon - Lucian Freud - Lourdes Castro born Frank Auerbach born Audrey Flack born Richard Smith - Nikias Skapinakis born Tom Wesselmann born Erro born Peter Blake born Paul Thek - James Rosenquist - Marjorie Strider - Antonio Areal - Little Whist Self-Portrait , Jules Pascin , After Delacroix's Michelangelo , — The third time, Savannale, Georgia , Acheson Go Home Unique proof inscribed to Alpha Gallery. Monseigneur Ungar , Heart , The Red Dancer of Moscow , Boys and Girls! Ctric News Topi , Greetings Pablo Ruiz, from the portfolio Immortal Portraits , Marlborough Graphics. See our Privacy Policy for more information about cookies. By continuing to use our sites and applications, you agree to our use of cookies. Get the latest news on the events, trends, and people that shape the global art market with our daily newsletter. Kitaj American, — Biography R. Kitaj was an American artist known for his expressive, figurative works that playfully depict contemporary life, art historical references, and sexuality. Using an array of aesthetic styles he merged the collage techniques of Pop Art with the agitated brushstrokes of Abstract Expressionism. Kitaj would spend much of the rest of his life in England, where he became close friends with the artist David Hockney and the philosopher Richard Wollheim. R.B. Kitaj | artnet It was a frenzy of activity that continued until events took a far bleaker turn with the sudden death of Sandra while Kitaj himself was away in America at the bedside of his mother who was also terminally sick. In the months that followed, Kitaj's grief and anger took on an epic quality. There was little comfort for him and no way of talking him out of it really. These included his long-time confidant Philip Roth , who, it seems, partly based the outrageous character of Mickey Sabbath, in his incandescent novel Sabbath's Theater , on the grief-stricken Kitaj — the book is told in the voice of a furious and confessional puppeteer driven mad by vividly sexual dreams of his lost lover, tortured by a fear of impotence and oblivion, by turns contemplating suicide and raging against the dying of the light. Richard Morphet, who curated the Tate show, still talks with a degree of incredulity and shock at how events drove Kitaj to this kind of state. As a result, Morphet recalls, "I felt the jolt of it almost as much as him, I think. When we went to bed after the party there was this sense of pleasure that he was getting his due for all of that, and then the following morning this extraordinary cascade of vitriol began The reviews, which seemed to grow in ferocity from a fairly hysterical start, went on for several days. It was in a way a nasty accident they all expressed it at the same time. When Morphet spoke to Kitaj in the days following the show he was "sort of disgusted really, very distressed. He never said it but I think this exhibition was what he had always wanted and worked towards his whole life. And the extremity of the outburst against it was as if to say: this is not valid. His whole raison d'etre was trashed. The main reason for the critics' damning verdict on the show, Morphet believes, was what was seen by one as Kitaj's "pseudo-intellectual bullshit". Kitaj was an eclectic reader and claimed literary inspiration for much of his work from writers ranging from TS Eliot to Franz Kafka to Walter Benjamin. He self-consciously rooted himself in an outsider's tradition, of Jewish intellectualism, equally obsessed with language and image. At the suggestion of Nicholas Serota, the Tate director, Kitaj sought to reflect some of this erudition in extended captions to his paintings that explained their inspiration and genesis. To many of the critics, who saw Kitaj invading their space, telling them what to think, this appeared to be fighting talk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Who Owns the Art World? an Online Panel Discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This Short Panel
    A DACS panel discussion, 14 March 2018 Who Owns the Art World? An online panel discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This short panel debate took place during DACS’ Annual Strategy Day, as we thought about the context in which artists are currently working and how best DACS could best support artists and artists’ estates in the future. The Panel Mark Waugh (Chair) is the Business Development Director at DACS. Hayley Newman, Artist and Reader of Fine Art, Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. Morgan Quaintance, writer, musician, broadcaster and curator. Richard Parry, Artist. Mark Waugh (MW): Welcome, and we’re live again at DACS, this time from RIBA, and we’re live with a specific question, it’s quite a simple question – “Who Owns the Art World?” And to answer that, what we’re going to have three presentations, one from Richard Parry, one from Hayley Newman and one from Morgan Quaintance. They come from very particular positions and I think you’ll be able to understand what those positions are after the presentations. Essentially, all three of them share a discourtesy of concern with that question of ownership - and not only the ownership of the art world in a conceptual and a material sense - but also in what the role and agency of the artist is, and indeed, art is, in that context. And we’re asking that in the context of DACS as an organisation which has a 30-year history of thinking about what artists can do to empower themselves and support each other.
    [Show full text]
  • My Article in the Last Issue of Finch's Quarterly About the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition Achieved a Very Modest Degree
    Hungary for Culture Charles Saumarez Smith takes issue with the line of Brian (Sewell) and looks forward to the Royal Academy’s Treasures from Budapest exhibition My article in the last issue of Finch’s Quarterly about the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition achieved a modest degree of fame by being quoted in Brian Sewell’s review of this year’s exhibition in the Evening Standard: As its chief executive put it in the current edition of a journal of which he is arts editor, the Academy holds “the 18th-century view that the best judges of art are not the critics but the public. Critics may sneer, but the public continues to enjoy the Summer Exhibition precisely because it gives them an opportunity to make up their own minds about what to like.” Sewell went on to say: The public can make up its mind about fish and chips and jellied eels, but to put it in charge of the kitchens of The Ritz would not be wise. And I am less sure that Charles Saumarez Smith’s contempt for critics was widely held anywhere in Europe in the 18th century, the Age of Reason, when the Enlightenment held sway; and even if it were, then the public to which he refers was not the ancestor of some bloke on the Clapham bendy-bus, but an educated gentleman with the benefits of private tutoring, Eton, Oxbridge and the Grand Tour, as ready with a Greek or Latin tag as our beloved Boris Johnson. The chief executive will find little of that background among the old biddies from Berkshire up for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Shawcross
    CONRAD SHAWCROSS Born 1977 in London, UK Lives and works in London, UK Education 2001 MFA, Slade School of Art, University College, London, UK 1999 BA (Hons), Fine Art, Ruskin School of Art, Oxford, UK 1996 Foundation, Chelsea School of Art, London, UK Permanent Commissions 2022 Manifold 5:4, Crossrail Art Programme, Liverpool Street station, Elizabeth line, London, UK ​ ​ 2020 Schism Pavilion, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Pioneering Places, Ramsgate Royal Harbour, Ramsgate, UK ​ ​ 2019 Bicameral, Chelsea Barracks, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ 2018 Exploded Paradigm, Comcast Technology Centre, Philadelphia, USA ​ 2017 Beijing Canopy, Guo Rui Square, Beijing, China ​ 2016 The Optic Cloak, The Energy Centre Greenwich Peninsula, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ Paradigm, Francis Crick Institute, curated by Artwise, London, UK ​ 2015 Three Perpetual Chords, Dulwich Park, curated and managed by the Contemporary Art Society for ​ Southwark Council, London, UK 2012 Canopy Study, 123 Victoria Street, London, UK ​ 2010 Fraction (9:8), Sadler Building, Oxford Science Park, curated and managed by Modus Operandi, Oxford, ​ UK 2009 Axiom (Tower), Ministry of Justice, London, UK ​ 2007 Space Trumpet, Unilever House, London, UK ​ Solo Exhibitions 2020 Conrad Shawcross, an extended reality (XR) exhibition on Vortic Collect, Victoria Miro, London, UK ​ ​ Escalations, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Celebrating 800 years of Spirit and Endeavour, Salisbury Cathedral, Salisbury,
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 the Preternatural Beauty and Equipoise of the Post-War Alexander Calder Mobiles
    REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 The preternatural beauty and equipoise of the post-war Alexander Calder mobiles at Pace Gallery, Burlington Gardens, London, are more than offset/countered by the vertiginous acedie of the exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London, entitled “Gaiety is the Most Outstanding Feature of the Soviet Union: New Art from Russia.” Foremost in the latter instance is the series “The Neighbors” by Vikenti Nilin (born 1971). This series of ten images, all black-and-white giclée prints of the exact same size (165 x 110 cm.), is absolutely stunning – and chilling. Image (left) – Vikenti Nilin, “The Neighbors,” Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London One needs to walk the length of Green Park, Hyde Park, and Kensington Gardens to properly prepare oneself for Calder (“Calder After the War”) versus the new Russian photography at Saatchi. (In preparation, one could even stop at the Natural History Museum in Knightsbridge for “Genesis,” semi-objective documentary photography by Sebastião Salgado, if crowds and entrance fees are acceptable.) The Calder mobiles are all installed on two floors in a classic, modernist white gallery at the north end of the Royal Academy, the whiteness of the spaces a tribute to the extreme austerities of the Calder mobiles and stabiles – the path to abstraction fully developed by 1945, the works shown covering the years 1945 to 1949. Curiously or not, Calder’s ascendance also coincides with the slow decline of the modernist avant-garde, which by 1927 was more or less over. This is a contentious issue, but it is more than borne out by the commoditization of modern art well underway by the mid- 1920s and the peculiar turn by Joan Miró into the repetition of his previously anarchic canon principally for the emergent modernist art market – a similar practice that beset Moholy-Nagy, Kandinsky, and others, primarily while in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • R.B. Kitaj Papers, 1950-2007 (Bulk 1965-2006)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3q2nf0wf No online items Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Processed by Tim Holland, 2006; Norma Williamson, 2011; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj 1741 1 papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Descriptive Summary Title: R.B. Kitaj papers Date (inclusive): 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Collection number: 1741 Creator: Kitaj, R.B. Extent: 160 boxes (80 linear ft.)85 oversized boxes Abstract: R.B. Kitaj was an influential and controversial American artist who lived in London for much of his life. He is the creator of many major works including; The Ohio Gang (1964), The Autumn of Central Paris (after Walter Benjamin) 1972-3; If Not, Not (1975-76) and Cecil Court, London W.C.2. (The Refugees) (1983-4). Throughout his artistic career, Kitaj drew inspiration from history, literature and his personal life. His circle of friends included philosophers, writers, poets, filmmakers, and other artists, many of whom he painted. Kitaj also received a number of honorary doctorates and awards including the Golden Lion for Painting at the XLVI Venice Biennale (1995). He was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters (1982) and the Royal Academy of Arts (1985).
    [Show full text]
  • THBT Social Disgust Is Legitimate Grounds for Restriction of Artistic Expression
    Published on idebate.org (http://idebate.org) Home > THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression The history of art is full of pieces which, at various points in time, have caused controversy, or sparked social disgust. The works most likely to provoke disgust are those that break taboos surrounding death, religion and sexual norms. Often, the debate around whether a piece is too ‘disgusting’ is interwoven with debate about whether that piece actually constitutes a work of art: people seem more willing to accept taboo-breaking pieces if they are within a clearly ‘artistic’ context (compare, for example, reactions to Michelangelo’s David with reactions to nudity elsewhere in society). As a consequence, the debate on the acceptability of shocking pieces has been tied up, at least in recent times, with the debate surrounding the acceptability of ‘conceptual art’ as art at all. Conceptual art1 is that which places an idea or concept (rather than visual effect) at the centre of the work. Marchel Duchamp is ordinarily considered to have begun the march towards acceptance of conceptual art, with his most famous piece, Fountain, a urinal signed with the pseudonym “R. Mutt”. It is popularly associated with the Turner Prize and the Young British Artists. This debate has a degree of scope with regards to the extent of the restriction of artistic expression that might be being considered here. Possible restrictions include: limiting display of some pieces of art to private collections only; withdrawing public funding (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Death, Dots & Dollars
    Department ART Death, Dots & Dollars The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living by JASON EDWARD KAUFMAN Have you heard the one about the artist who put a 13-foot tiger shark in a glass tank of formaldehyde? Of course you have, and you know it’s no joke. That pickled man-eater is one of the most recognized icons of contemporary culture, and the Damien Hirst turned himself into a pop culture man who created it more than two decades ago, British enfant terrible Damien Hirst, has become a bold-faced name and possibly the best-known artist alive. phenomenon, and along the way became the At 48, he may also be the richest. Three years ago, The Sunday Times pegged his assets at £235 million ($342 million), probably an underestimate for an artist world’s richest artist. who sells works for six figures apiece—some have approached $20 million—and whose production teams crank them out in quantity. w Photo: Ben Stansall/Getty Images 214 Winter 2012 Winter 2012 215 Some critics say he’s the new Warhol, but others label him a shock jock more interested in making headlines and money than meaningful art. The Evening Standard’s Brian Sewell gutted the shark, declaring it “no more interesting than a stuffed pike over a pub door,” and Time magazine’s Robert Hughes dubbed it “the world’s most over-rated marine organism.” But how’s this for return on investment? British advertising mogul Charles Saatchi paid £50,000 (approximately $80,000) for the shark in 1992 and in 2004 sold it to Connecticut hedge funder Steven Cohen for $12 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Kontrastphänomene in Den Porträts Von Frank Auerbach
    Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch Dieses Werk ist unter dem Vertrag „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung 3.0 Schweiz“ (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 CH) lizenziert. Die vollständige Lizenz kann unter creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ch/ eingesehen werden. Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung 3.0 Schweiz (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 CH) Sie dürfen: Teilen — den Inhalt kopieren, verbreiten und zugänglich machen Unter den folgenden Bedingungen: Namensnennung — Sie müssen den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen. Keine kommerzielle Nutzung — Sie dürfen diesen Inhalt nicht für kommerzielle Zwecke nutzen. Keine Bearbeitung erlaubt — Sie dürfen diesen Inhalt nicht bearbeiten, abwandeln oder in anderer Weise verändern. Wobei gilt: Verzichtserklärung — Jede der vorgenannten Bedingungen kann aufgehoben werden, sofern Sie die ausdrückliche Einwilligung des Rechteinhabers dazu erhalten. Public Domain (gemeinfreie oder nicht-schützbare Inhalte) — Soweit das Werk, der Inhalt oder irgendein Teil davon zur Public Domain der jeweiligen Rechtsordnung gehört, wird dieser Status von der Lizenz in keiner Weise berührt. Sonstige Rechte — Die Lizenz hat keinerlei Einfluss auf die folgenden Rechte: o Die Rechte, die jedermann wegen der Schranken des Urheberrechts oder aufgrund gesetzlicher Erlaubnisse zustehen (in einigen Ländern als grundsätzliche Doktrin des fair use bekannt); o Die Persönlichkeitsrechte des Urhebers; o Rechte anderer Personen, entweder am Lizenzgegenstand selber oder bezüglich seiner Verwendung, zum Beispiel für Werbung oder Privatsphärenschutz. Hinweis — Bei jeder Nutzung oder Verbreitung müssen Sie anderen alle Lizenzbedingungen mitteilen, die für diesen Inhalt gelten. Am einfachsten ist es, an entsprechender Stelle einen Link auf diese Seite einzubinden.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIAN SEWELL, LESLIE WADDINGTON and ART of the NINETIES: the COLLECTORS THAT DEFINED LONDON's ART WORLD from the 1950S TO
    PRESS RELEASE | LONDON FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE : 2 6 SEPTEMBER 2 0 1 6 BRIAN SEWELL, LESLIE WADDINGTON AND ART OF THE NINETIES : THE COLLECTORS THAT DEFINED LONDON’S ART WORLD FROM THE 1950s TO PRESENT DAY Top Row (L to R): Matthias Stomer, Brian Sewell and John Craxton, Middle Row (L to R): Leslie Waddington, Jean Dubuffet and Francis Picabia, Bottom Row (L to R): Douglas Gordon, Damien Hirst and Glenn Brown London – This autumn Christie’s will offer works from three private collections that trace the development and trajectory of the London art scene from the 1950s to present day. This begins with the collection of Brian Sewell, the Evening Standard’s late art critic, who was a Specialist in the Old Master Department at Christie’s in the 1950s and 60s, having graduated in Art History at the Courtauld Institute, and nurtured a keen appetite for Renaissance works that span the 1500s through to Modern British artists of the mid-20th century. He built up a distinctive collection and 248 lots will be offered on 27 September including paintings by the Flemish artist Matthias Stomer, works on paper by the likes of Daniele da Volterra and Joseph Anton Koch, and the British Modernism of Duncan Grant and Eliot Hodgkin. One of the most influential collectors that developed London’s tastes was Leslie Waddington, who arrived in the city in 1957 and went on to become one of the most prominent fine art dealers in modern times, introducing the art world to artists from Jean Dubuffet to Patrick Caulfield, bringing the British and European aesthetic to America for the first time, and American Abstract Expressionism to London.
    [Show full text]
  • Emmanuel Cooper Archive
    Emmanuel Cooper Archive (COOPER) ©Bishopsgate Institute Catalogued by Stefan Dickers, September 2019 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents p.2 Collection Level Description p.3 COOPER/1: Gay Art Archive p.5 COOPER/2: Art Projects p.88 COOPER/3: Gay Left Archive p.93 COOPER/4: Campaign for Homosexual Equality Papers p.108 COOPER/5: Scrapbooks p.126 COOPER/6: Gay Theatre Archive p.127 COOPER/7: Gay History Group p.131 COOPER/8: Portobello Boys p.132 2 COOPER Emmanuel Cooper Archive 1956-209 Name of Creator: Cooper, Emmanuel (1938-2012) potter and writer on the arts Extent: 28 Boxes and oversize items Administrative/Biographical History: Emmanuel Cooper was born in Pilsley, North East Derbyshire and studied at the University for the Creative Arts. He also achieved a PhD degree at Middlesex University. He was a member of the Crafts Council and the editor of Ceramic Review. Since 1999, he was visiting Professor of Ceramics and Glass at the Royal College of Art. He was the author of many books on ceramics, including his definitive biography of Bernard Leach that was published in 2003 (Yale University Press), and was also the editor of The Ceramics Book, published in 2006. In the early 1970s, he was also a cofounder of the Gay Left collective, and remained a prominent LGBT rights campaigner throughout his life. He also published several studies of LGBT art, including The Sexual Perspective and Fully Exposed: The Male Nude in Photography. As a potter, Cooper's work falls into one of two general forms. In the first his vessels are heavily glazed in a volcanic form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brian Sewell Archive an Introduction
    DRAWING ROOM DISPLAYS The Brian Sewell Archive An Introduction 8 May - 8 September 2017 Item 22 Introduction This display features material from Sewell’s early childhood to the the Brian Sewell Archive which end of his days. From passports to was donated to the Paul Mellon diaries, press-cuttings, postcards, Centre in July 2016. The work photographs, programmes, letters, of reviewing the collection has and even a portrait [see item 1], it is been ongoing since it entered the all here: the rich tapestry of a life. building and—whilst this task is not This display contains only a small yet complete—the key aim of this selection from the huge volume display is to provide an introduction and wealth of material. Alongside to the archive. With the display now a biographical section, the items open and the archive collection chosen fall into three main themes available for consultation, this is the which reflect, perhaps, some of the first time that any of the items have most important aspects of his life been seen by the public. and the contents of the archive. Despite a cull undertaken by These are: “the Blunt affair”; travel; Sewell as his health deteriorated, and art criticism and controversy. the archive contains material from There was, of course, a across his life, thereby reflecting huge amount that did not the Centre’s current acquisition make the “final cut”. A more policy in this area.1 When the detailed summary can be found material was transferred to the in the boxlist available on our Centre, it comprised a total of website, but a few highlights seventy bankers boxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwards' First Name at This Sensi
    Merlin Carpenter Matthew Collings Our paintings and graphics throw Edwards’ first name at this sensi- discourse of “medium specificity” might be seen as the parents of clear for them how to respond to desire to be a “Goldsmith’s artist” and embarrassment, rather than fact these later developments framework for analysing art’s pop- From my point of view, Carpenter’s It featured work by a handful of Matthew’s style produces any Carpenter and his cronies, plus the opened up within the media: eyes are the wrong colour). It is support group. In this review he Surely society was abolished by But when is this “present”? And referring to a story about Lucas forced to accept that bullshit is as His paintings are brutal abstracts more aesthetic. Some are more Our paintings are against this ap- a good one. But should writing be Media Guy Our PaintinG s down the glove to what’s going tive point. (Perhaps while polishing is an intellectual talking shop full the popularization process having the success of the big push. In on the most grand seriousness. A scene arrives had already terminated yBa, ularity is worth reading. ” (p 124) art practice is often funny. New figures discussed in the book, with serious results in terms of actual more commercially successful ones “a space where the avant-garde‘s certain that Buchloh’s language often seems to be communicating Thatcher? I am not defined by for what audience? This process involving an accident with a piano, natural as breathing and as vital that do little for a renewal of poetic.
    [Show full text]