DOCSLIB.ORG

THBT Social Disgust Is Legitimate Grounds for Restriction of Artistic Expression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THBT Social Disgust Is Legitimate Grounds for Restriction of Artistic Expression Published on idebate.org (http://idebate.org) Home > THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression The history of art is full of pieces which, at various points in time, have caused controversy, or sparked social disgust. The works most likely to provoke disgust are those that break taboos surrounding death, religion and sexual norms. Often, the debate around whether a piece is too ‘disgusting’ is interwoven with debate about whether that piece actually constitutes a work of art: people seem more willing to accept taboo-breaking pieces if they are within a clearly ‘artistic’ context (compare, for example, reactions to Michelangelo’s David with reactions to nudity elsewhere in society). As a consequence, the debate on the acceptability of shocking pieces has been tied up, at least in recent times, with the debate surrounding the acceptability of ‘conceptual art’ as art at all. Conceptual art1 is that which places an idea or concept (rather than visual effect) at the centre of the work. Marchel Duchamp is ordinarily considered to have begun the march towards acceptance of conceptual art, with his most famous piece, Fountain, a urinal signed with the pseudonym “R. Mutt”. It is popularly associated with the Turner Prize and the Young British Artists. This debate has a degree of scope with regards to the extent of the restriction of artistic expression that might be being considered here. Possible restrictions include: limiting display of some pieces of art to private collections only; withdrawing public funding (e.g. Arts Council grants, in the UK) from artists considered to have produced unacceptable art; and, at the more extreme end, the complete censorship of some art. For the purposes of the debate below I will assume that in most sensible debates what will be discussed is one or both of the first two of those options (removal from public display and withdrawal of public funds). Key Examples: There are a number of key examples of works of art that have caused public controversy and social disgust. Notable amongst these are works by the ‘Young British Artists (YBA)’2, whose ranks include Damien Hirst, Sarah Lucas and Tracey Emin. Damien Hirst: Amongst Hirst’s work, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living3, (a 14-foot tiger shark preserved in formaldehyde), A Thousand Years4 (a rotting cow’s head, lying in blood, in a large glass cube, with an adjoining cube containing maggots and flies) and For the Love of God5 (a platinum cast of a human skull, covered in diamonds) are probably his most well-known. Both at the time of display and retrospectively, press responses to Hirst have been mixed: some, including Saatchi, (who famously displayed Hirst’s work at his gallery, and provided the funding for The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living), embraced Hirst’s bold approach, others6 accused him of cynically exploiting the press attention his ‘shock tactics’ gained him. Objections have also been levelled at him by those against the way in which animals are used in his work; from the horror of the rotting cow’s head to the death of butterflies in an exhibition (In and Out of Love7) in 1991 (recreated at the Tate retrospective in 2012). Tracey Emin has also found herself at the centre of controversy, most famously with her piece, My Bed8, an unmade bed complete with empty bottles of alcohol, worn underwear, cigarette ends and condoms. Like Hirst, Emin was caught up in the interminable debate about the character of conceptual art, and whether the ideas she used were appropriate for the public sphere: her art has drawn attention to abortion, self-harm class, sexuality and alcoholism9. Sarah Lucas10 has not gained as much recent media attention as her YBA contemporaries, but during the 90s and early 2000s shot to prominence with a series of provocative pieces exploring sexuality, sex and gender stereotyping. Whilst many admired her (Damien Hirst described her as "out there stripped to the mast like Turner in the storm, making excellent pieces over and over again"11), others considered her work shocking, or disgusting, with its frequent use of ordinary objects to represent human genitalia12. Jake and Dinos Chapman most recently caught the eye of the media when participating in an exhibition with a number of other artists, “Adventure land Golf” (Grundy Art Gallery). Their contribution was a Hitler statue, whose arm would give a Hitler salute every time a ball passed through its legs. This caused a degree of consternation, and Michael Samuels, of The Board of Deputies of British Jews said, "I am appalled that the gallery would stoop to show an item like this which, in my opinion, has got absolutely no artistic value whatsoever”13. The Chapman brothers have also produced a number of other controversial works, most famously Hell, a sculpture showing many toy figures and Nazi soldiers in a gruesome scene. Hell drew the praise of some14, who saw it as a modern piece in a line of great artists depicting horror and the grotesque, but the condemnation of others. Picasso produced Guernica15, arguably the most well-known of his works, and widely regarded as a modern masterpiece, as a swift reaction to the bombing of the Basque town of Guernica (during the Spanish Civil War). At the time of its first display, however, initial reactions to the painting ranged from disgust (including, famously, that of a German officer searching Picasso’s apartment, who, finding a copy of Guernica, says “did you do this?”, to which Picasso replied, “no, you did”), through to indifference and condemnation on ‘artistic grounds’. It was seen as being too close to the event for a non-realist interpretation to be politically effective, and therefore acceptable. Jason Mecier16: This San Francisco-based artist, like the YBAs, uses ‘found objects’ in his art. He recently received a great deal of media attention when he included a mosaic of Whitney Houston made from pills in an exhibition shortly after her death. Whilst it is described by the artist as a “pill memorial”17, others found it tasteless. 1 Appleton, Josie, ‘Conceptual art’, spiked, 20 November 2003, http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000006DFD9.htm 2 Nicholson, Octavia, ‘Young British Artists’, Grove Art Online, 2009, http://www.moma.org/collection/theme.php?theme_id=10220 3 ‘The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living’, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Physical_Impossibility_of_Death_in_the_Mind_of_Someone_Living 4 Searle, Adrian, ‘Damian Hirst – review’, guardian.co.uk, 2 April 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2012/apr/02/damien-hirst-tate-review 5 ‘For the Love of God’, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_the_Love_of_God 6 Sewell, Brian, ‘Damien Hirst, Tate Modern – Brian Sewell’s review’, London Evening Standard, 5 April 2012, http://www.standard.co.uk/arts/visual-arts/damien-hirst-tate-modern--brian-sewells-review-7618751.html 7 Barkham, Patrick, ‘Damien Hirst’s butterflies: distressing but weirdly uplifting’, guardian.co.uk, 18 April 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/apr/18/damien-hirst-butterflies-weirdly-uplifting 8 ‘Tracy Emin My Bed’, The Saatchi Gallery, http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/artists/artpages/tracey_emin_my_bed.htm 9 Dorment, Richard, ‘Tracy Emin: Love Is What You Want, Hayward Gallery, review’, The Telegraph, 16 May 2011, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-reviews/8517013/Tracey-Emin-Love-Is-What-You-Want-Hayward-Gallery-review.html 10 ‘Sarah Lucas’, Grove Art Online, http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/sarah-lucas-2643 11 Patterson, Christina, ‘Sarah Lucas: A Young British Artist grows up and speaks out’, The Independent, 21 July 2012, http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/sarah-lucas-a-young-british-artist-grows-up-and-speaks-out- 7959882.html 12 Levey, Kathryn, ‘Sarah Lucas – Still Shocking In Tate Liverpool Exhibition’, Culture24, 16 November 2005, http://www.culture24.org.uk/places+to+go/north+west/liverpool/art31844 13 ‘Adolf Hitler golf art in Blackpool ‘tasteless’’, BBC News, 14 August 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire- 19254556 14 Jones, Jonathan, ‘The Chapman brothers’ Hell is the best art of our age’, guardian.co.uk, 23 February 2009, http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2009/feb/23/chapman-hell-art 15 ‘Guernica, 1937 by Pablo Picasso’, Pablo Picasso, 2009, http://www.pablopicasso.org/guernica.jsp 16 ‘Jason Mecier’, Jasonmercier.com, http://www.jasonmecier.com/ 17 Becknell, Vanessa, ‘Acclaimed Mosaic Artist Jason Mecier Sits Down to Talk Shop… (and the Whitneu Piece)’, Huffpost Arts & Culture, 7 March 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vanessa-becknell/acclaimed-mosaic-artist-j_b_1319704.html Amanda Moorghen For Just shock-tactics, at the cost of better art Point: Sometimes artists go too far in a bid to get their message across. Simply grabbing the headlines with shock tactics does not constitute art of the sort that should be receiving either public support or attention. It is important to recognise that public displays and funding of art are limited commodities, so every time one piece is chosen for an exhibition, or an artist is given money, this comes at the cost of other possible pieces of art. It is surely better to support those artists who have chosen to express their ideas and messages in a way that does not rely on simple attention-grabbing horror: it is surely more artistically meritorious to create a work that conveys its message in a way that rewards close attention and careful study, with layers of meaning and technique. Counterpoint: Who determines whether something is too disgusting? It is also hard to separate a piece of work’s artistic merit from its impact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sculpture in the City 2017
    Join the conversation #sculptureinthecity Sculpture in the City is an annual urban sculpture park located in the insurance district of the Square Mile and surrounded by the iconic towers that define the area. Every summer, the City of London, with support from /visitthecity @sculpturecity @visitthecity local businesses, unveils a brand new selection of www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/sculptureinthecity public art by major and internationally acclaimed artists. World class contemporary sculpture complements the unique architectural quality of the area and engages the passers-by, who range from local workers to architectural tourists and animates one of the most dynamic parts of the City of London. An official partner of Sculpture in the City The 2017 edition is now the seventh in the series which has shown 70 artists to date and continues to grow from strength to strength. If you are interested in being involved please contact the team at [email protected] Scan the art, uncover the story Download the app to uncover the stories behind the sculptures 1 AJAR 2 THE BLACK HORSE GAVIN TURK MARK WALLINGER © Nick Turpin © Nick Turpin 2011 2015 PAINTED BRONZE BRONZE, RESIN, STAINLESS STEEL 229 x 103 x 66 cm 196 x 273 x 67 cm COPYRIGHT THE ARTIST COPYRIGHT THE ARTIST COURTESY OF THE ARTIST & AEROPLASTICS CONTEMPORARY COURTESY OF THE ARTIST & HAUSER & WIRTH As a direct reference to the painting ‘La Victoire’ by Rene Magritte, Ajar The sculpture was made with the help of advanced technology, scanning is a surreal gateway: a spiritual journey through the imagination, an a racehorse, part owned by the artist, named Rivera Red.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Los Angeles Collectors Jane and Marc
    PRESS RELEASE Los Angeles Collectors Jane and Marc Nathanson Give Major Artworks to LACMA Art Will Be Shown with Other Promised Gifts at 50th Anniversary Exhibition in April (Image captions on page 3) (Los Angeles, January 26, 2015)—The Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) is pleased to announce eight promised gifts of art from Jane and Marc Nathanson. The Nathansons’ gift of eight works of contemporary art includes seminal pieces by Damien Hirst, Roy Lichtenstein, Frank Stella, Andy Warhol, and others. The bequest is made in honor of LACMA’s 50th anniversary in 2015. The gifts kick off a campaign, chaired by LACMA trustees Jane Nathanson and Lynda Resnick, to encourage additional promised gifts of art for the museum’s anniversary. Gifts resulting from this campaign will be exhibited at LACMA April 26–September 7, 2015, in an exhibition, 50 for 50: Gifts on the Occasion of LACMA’s Anniversary. "What do you give a museum for its birthday? Art. As we reach the milestone of our 50th anniversary, it is truly inspiring to see generous patrons thinking about the future generations of visitors who will enjoy these great works of art for years and decades to come,” said Michael Govan, LACMA CEO and Wallis Annenberg Director. “Jane and Marc Nathanson have kicked off our anniversary year in grand fashion.” Jane Nathanson added, “I hope these gifts will inspire others to make significant contributions in the form of artwork as we look forward not only to the 50th anniversary of the museum, but to the next 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Art World? an Online Panel Discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This Short Panel
    A DACS panel discussion, 14 March 2018 Who Owns the Art World? An online panel discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This short panel debate took place during DACS’ Annual Strategy Day, as we thought about the context in which artists are currently working and how best DACS could best support artists and artists’ estates in the future. The Panel Mark Waugh (Chair) is the Business Development Director at DACS. Hayley Newman, Artist and Reader of Fine Art, Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. Morgan Quaintance, writer, musician, broadcaster and curator. Richard Parry, Artist. Mark Waugh (MW): Welcome, and we’re live again at DACS, this time from RIBA, and we’re live with a specific question, it’s quite a simple question – “Who Owns the Art World?” And to answer that, what we’re going to have three presentations, one from Richard Parry, one from Hayley Newman and one from Morgan Quaintance. They come from very particular positions and I think you’ll be able to understand what those positions are after the presentations. Essentially, all three of them share a discourtesy of concern with that question of ownership - and not only the ownership of the art world in a conceptual and a material sense - but also in what the role and agency of the artist is, and indeed, art is, in that context. And we’re asking that in the context of DACS as an organisation which has a 30-year history of thinking about what artists can do to empower themselves and support each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for God by Simone Weil
    WAITING FOR GOD Simone '111eil WAITING FOR GOD TRANSLATED BY EMMA CRAUFURD rwith an 1ntroduction by Leslie .A. 1iedler PERENNIAL LIBilAilY LIJ Harper & Row, Publishers, New York Grand Rapids, Philadelphia, St. Louis, San Francisco London, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto This book was originally published by G. P. Putnam's Sons and is here reprinted by arrangement. WAITING FOR GOD Copyright © 1951 by G. P. Putnam's Sons. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written per­ mission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address G. P. Putnam's Sons, 200 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.10016. First HARPER COLOPHON edition published in 1973 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER: 0-06-{)90295-7 96 RRD H 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 Contents BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Vll INTRODUCTION BY LESLIE A. FIEDLER 3 LETTERS LETTER I HESITATIONS CONCERNING BAPTISM 43 LETTER II SAME SUBJECT 52 LETTER III ABOUT HER DEPARTURE s8 LETTER IV SPIRITUAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY 61 LETTER v HER INTELLECTUAL VOCATION 84 LETTER VI LAST THOUGHTS 88 ESSAYS REFLECTIONS ON THE RIGHT USE OF SCHOOL STUDIES WITII A VIEW TO THE LOVE OF GOD 105 THE LOVE OF GOD AND AFFLICTION 117 FORMS OF THE IMPLICIT LOVE OF GOD 1 37 THE LOVE OF OUR NEIGHBOR 1 39 LOVE OF THE ORDER OF THE WORLD 158 THE LOVE OF RELIGIOUS PRACTICES 181 FRIENDSHIP 200 IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LOVE 208 CONCERNING THE OUR FATHER 216 v Biographical 7\lote• SIMONE WEIL was born in Paris on February 3, 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release Abigail Lane Tomorrows World, Yesterdays Fever (Mental Guests Incorporated) Victoria Miro Gallery, 4 October – 10 November 2001 The exhibition is organized by the Milton Keynes Gallery in collaboration with Film and Video Umbrella The Victoria Miro Gallery presents a major solo exhibition of work by Abigail Lane. Tomorrows World, Yesterdays Fever (Mental Guests Incorporated) extends her preoccupation with the fantastical, the Gothic and the uncanny through a trio of arresting and theatrical installations which are based around film projections. Abigail Lane is well known for her large-scale inkpads, wallpaper made with body prints, wax casts of body fragments and ambiguous installations. In these earlier works Lane emphasized the physical marking of the body, often referred to as traces or evidence. In this exhibition Lane turns inward giving form to the illusive and intangible world of the psyche. Coupled with her long-standing fascination with turn-of-the-century phenomena such as séances, freak shows, circus and magic acts, Lane creates a “funhouse-mirror reflection” of the life of the mind. The Figment explores the existence of instinctual urges that lie deep within us. Bathed in a vivid red light, the impish boy-figment beckons us, “Hey, do you hear me…I’m inside you, I’m yours…..I’m here, always here in the dark, I am the dark, your dark… and I want to play….”. A mischievous but not sinister “devil on your shoulder” who taunts and tempts us to join him in his wicked game. The female protagonist of The Inclination is almost the boy-figment’s antithesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Jake & Dinos Chapman
    Jake & Dinos Chapman Dinos Chapman, born in 1962, London, UK and Jake Chapman, born 1966, Cheltenham, UK, currently live and work in Los Angeles/London. EDUCATION DINOS CHAPMAN 1981 B.A., Ravensbourne College of Art 1990 M.A., Royal College of Art JAKE CHAPMAN 1988 B.A., North East London Polytechnic 1990 M.A., Royal College of Art AWARDS 2003 Winners of the Royal Academy of Arts Charles Wollaston Award (at the Summer Exhibition) Nominated for Turner Prize Bring Me the Head of..., Edition of 200, 7 mins, published by Ridinghouse Editions, London SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 The Rainbow of Human Kindness, HE.RO Gallery, Amsterdam, NL (forthcoming) 2018 Jake & Dinos Chapman: March of The Banal, ARoS Aarhus Kunstmuseum, DK 2017 The Disasters of War, The Goya Museum, Zaragoza, Spain The Disasters of Everyday Life, Blain|Southern, London, UK Jake & Dinos Chapman, Cass Sculpture Foundation, New Barn Hill, Goodwood, UK In the Realm of the Senseless, ARTER, Istanbul, TR 2016 Back to the End of the Beginning of the End Again, Kammel Mennour, Paris, FR The Nature of Particles, Magasin III, Stockholm, SE 2015 Homage to Freud, Eggs and Bacon, Gabriel Rolt, Amsterdam, NL Ruminations on Cosmic Insignificance, Brandts Museum, Odense, DK 2014 Come, Hell or High Water, David Risley Gallery, Copenhagen, DK In the Realm of the Unmentionable, Jerwood Gallery, Hastings, UK 2013 Come and See, Serpentine Sackler Gallery, London, UK; travelled to DHC/, Montreal, CA The Sleep of Reason, Songeun Artspace Museum, Seoul, KR The Sum of all Evil, White Cube, Hong Kong, CN The Blind Leading the Blind, Galerie Rudolfinum, Prague, CZ Exquisite Corpse, Jerwood Gallery, London, UK Chicken, Pinchuk Art Centre, Kiev, UR 2012 The End of Fun, The Hermitage, St.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ART of CHESS 8 September – 3 October 2012
    Photography by Norbert Schoerner. Courtesy of RS&A THE ART OF CHESS 8 September – 3 October 2012 presented by SAATCHI GALLERY and RS&A in association with “From my close contact with artists and chess players I have come to the personal conclusion that while all artists are not chess players, all chess players are artists.” Marcel Duchamp, 1952. The Art of Chess brings together 16 chess sets designed by some of the world’s leading contemporary artists in celebration of the ‘game of kings’ and its continued relevance to the creative arts. These specially commissioned chess sets have been created by: Maurizio Cattelan, Jake and Dinos Chapman, Oliver Clegg, Tracey Emin, Tom Friedman, Paul Fryer, Damien Hirst, Barbara Kruger, Yayoi Kusama, Paul McCarthy, Alastair Mackie, Tim Noble and Sue Webster, Matthew Ronay,Tunga, Gavin Turk and Rachel Whiteread. Each set is individually crafted in a wide variety of different materials including wood, porcelain, glass, amber and silver. This exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery will be the first time that all 16 chess sets are displayed together and it will also be the first public showing of a new commission by British artists Tim Noble and Sue Webster. Famous for their shadow sculptures, the artists have taken the opportunity to return to their on-going fascination with dead animals and have created a woodland chess set complete with hand carved tree stump with bronze chess pieces inspired by the artists’ collection of mummified animals - found on their farm in Gloucestershire - squirrels take the roles of King and Queen and frogs act as Pawns.
    [Show full text]
  • My Article in the Last Issue of Finch's Quarterly About the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition Achieved a Very Modest Degree
    Hungary for Culture Charles Saumarez Smith takes issue with the line of Brian (Sewell) and looks forward to the Royal Academy’s Treasures from Budapest exhibition My article in the last issue of Finch’s Quarterly about the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition achieved a modest degree of fame by being quoted in Brian Sewell’s review of this year’s exhibition in the Evening Standard: As its chief executive put it in the current edition of a journal of which he is arts editor, the Academy holds “the 18th-century view that the best judges of art are not the critics but the public. Critics may sneer, but the public continues to enjoy the Summer Exhibition precisely because it gives them an opportunity to make up their own minds about what to like.” Sewell went on to say: The public can make up its mind about fish and chips and jellied eels, but to put it in charge of the kitchens of The Ritz would not be wise. And I am less sure that Charles Saumarez Smith’s contempt for critics was widely held anywhere in Europe in the 18th century, the Age of Reason, when the Enlightenment held sway; and even if it were, then the public to which he refers was not the ancestor of some bloke on the Clapham bendy-bus, but an educated gentleman with the benefits of private tutoring, Eton, Oxbridge and the Grand Tour, as ready with a Greek or Latin tag as our beloved Boris Johnson. The chief executive will find little of that background among the old biddies from Berkshire up for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Shawcross
    CONRAD SHAWCROSS Born 1977 in London, UK Lives and works in London, UK Education 2001 MFA, Slade School of Art, University College, London, UK 1999 BA (Hons), Fine Art, Ruskin School of Art, Oxford, UK 1996 Foundation, Chelsea School of Art, London, UK Permanent Commissions 2022 Manifold 5:4, Crossrail Art Programme, Liverpool Street station, Elizabeth line, London, UK ​ ​ 2020 Schism Pavilion, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Pioneering Places, Ramsgate Royal Harbour, Ramsgate, UK ​ ​ 2019 Bicameral, Chelsea Barracks, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ 2018 Exploded Paradigm, Comcast Technology Centre, Philadelphia, USA ​ 2017 Beijing Canopy, Guo Rui Square, Beijing, China ​ 2016 The Optic Cloak, The Energy Centre Greenwich Peninsula, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ Paradigm, Francis Crick Institute, curated by Artwise, London, UK ​ 2015 Three Perpetual Chords, Dulwich Park, curated and managed by the Contemporary Art Society for ​ Southwark Council, London, UK 2012 Canopy Study, 123 Victoria Street, London, UK ​ 2010 Fraction (9:8), Sadler Building, Oxford Science Park, curated and managed by Modus Operandi, Oxford, ​ UK 2009 Axiom (Tower), Ministry of Justice, London, UK ​ 2007 Space Trumpet, Unilever House, London, UK ​ Solo Exhibitions 2020 Conrad Shawcross, an extended reality (XR) exhibition on Vortic Collect, Victoria Miro, London, UK ​ ​ Escalations, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Celebrating 800 years of Spirit and Endeavour, Salisbury Cathedral, Salisbury,
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 the Preternatural Beauty and Equipoise of the Post-War Alexander Calder Mobiles
    REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 The preternatural beauty and equipoise of the post-war Alexander Calder mobiles at Pace Gallery, Burlington Gardens, London, are more than offset/countered by the vertiginous acedie of the exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London, entitled “Gaiety is the Most Outstanding Feature of the Soviet Union: New Art from Russia.” Foremost in the latter instance is the series “The Neighbors” by Vikenti Nilin (born 1971). This series of ten images, all black-and-white giclée prints of the exact same size (165 x 110 cm.), is absolutely stunning – and chilling. Image (left) – Vikenti Nilin, “The Neighbors,” Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London One needs to walk the length of Green Park, Hyde Park, and Kensington Gardens to properly prepare oneself for Calder (“Calder After the War”) versus the new Russian photography at Saatchi. (In preparation, one could even stop at the Natural History Museum in Knightsbridge for “Genesis,” semi-objective documentary photography by Sebastião Salgado, if crowds and entrance fees are acceptable.) The Calder mobiles are all installed on two floors in a classic, modernist white gallery at the north end of the Royal Academy, the whiteness of the spaces a tribute to the extreme austerities of the Calder mobiles and stabiles – the path to abstraction fully developed by 1945, the works shown covering the years 1945 to 1949. Curiously or not, Calder’s ascendance also coincides with the slow decline of the modernist avant-garde, which by 1927 was more or less over. This is a contentious issue, but it is more than borne out by the commoditization of modern art well underway by the mid- 1920s and the peculiar turn by Joan Miró into the repetition of his previously anarchic canon principally for the emergent modernist art market – a similar practice that beset Moholy-Nagy, Kandinsky, and others, primarily while in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Mark Callaghan Typeset Revised
    Mark Callaghan is a Ph.D candidate at Birkbeck, University of London. Mark's thesis concerns the Berlin Holocaust Memorial Competition of the 1990s, a VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1 SUMMER 2014 contest which resulted in The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. Mark also teaches on contemporary memory culture, and is Lecturer in 20th Century European Art at The Highgate Institute, London. Mark is a graduate of Oxford University and the University of Manchester. [email protected] Exhibition Review ‘Jake and Dinos Chapman: Come and See’ Serpentine Sackler Gallery, 29 November 2013 to 9 February 2014 Mark Callaghan / __________________________________________ The Chapman Brothers have been having a laugh for twenty years. They are the clowns of contemporary art, mischievously mocking the notion of causing offence, would-be progeny of the Marquis de Sade, ridiculing an art world that continues to endorse them. According to the conservative press, in general, the joke has been at our expense. These fraternal collaborators have always been ‘getting away with it’, producing Viz comic-style humour under the auspices of patrons who have more money than aesthetic or conceptual sense. Where is the artistic merit? Where is the skill, the craftsmanship? Why are they always trying to alarm us? Even The Independent’s review of this exhibition claims that the Chapmans ‘still have the power to shock’ though to be shocked is to demote the weight of dark humour that pervades their work.1 It also causes me to wonder whether the writer in question has ever seen the television news, or even the pages of their own newspaper, for that matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Damien Hirst Visual Candy and Natural History
    G A G O S I A N 7 February 2018 DAMIEN HIRST VISUAL CANDY AND NATURAL HISTORY EXTENDED! Through Saturday, March 3, 2018 7/F Pedder Building, 12 Pedder Street Central, Hong Kong I had my stomach pumped as a child because I ate pills thinking they were sweets […] I can’t understand why some people believe completely in medicine and not in art, without questioning either. —Damien Hirst Gagosian is pleased to present “Visual Candy and Natural History,” a selection of paintings and sculptures by Damien Hirst from the early- to mid-1990s. The exhibition coincides with Hirst’s most ambitious and complex project to date, “Treasures from the Wreck of the Unbelievable,” on view at Palazzo Grassi and Punta della Dogana in Venice until December 3. Since emerging onto the international art scene in the late 1980s as the protagonist of a generation of British artists, Hirst has created installations, sculptures, paintings and drawings that examine the complex relationships between art, beauty, religion, science, life and death. Through series as diverse as the ‘Spot Paintings’, ‘Medicine Cabinets’, ‘Natural History’ and butterfly ‘Kaleidoscope Paintings,’ he has investigated and challenged contemporary belief systems, tracing the uncertainties that lie at the heart of human experience. This exhibition juxtaposes the joyful, colorful abstractions of his ‘Visual Candy’ paintings with the clinical forms of his ‘Natural History’ sculptures. Page 1 of 3 The ‘Visual Candy’ paintings allude to movements including Impressionism, Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art, while the ‘Natural History’ sculptures—glass tanks containing biological specimens preserved in formaldehyde—reflect the visceral realities of scientific investigation through minimalist design.
    [Show full text]