Chapman for the Duo’S Retrospective in Istanbul Which Had Been on Display During 10/2/2017-7/5/2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapman for the Duo’S Retrospective in Istanbul Which Had Been on Display During 10/2/2017-7/5/2017 This article was commissioned by the art gallery ARTER (Istanbul, Turkey) and the artists Jake & Dinos Chapman for the duo’s retrospective in Istanbul which had been on display during 10/2/2017-7/5/2017. For further information on the show, please click here. Reviewed by the artists and the editors of the exhibition monograph, this essay was originally written in English. Both the English original and the Turkish translation was published in this monograph. In line with the commissioning brief, the article attempts to provide a critical review of the Chapmans’ art practice while also locating the duo’s artworks within an original theoretical framework. Jake & Dinos Chapman ANLAMSIZLIK ÂLEMİNDE — IN THE REALM OF THE SENSELESS CHAPMAN 23-01-17.indd 3 23.01.2017 17:59 Jake & Dinos Chapman Anlamsızlık Âleminde In the Realm of the Senseless Genel Yayın Yönetmeni | Editor-in-Chief Bu yayın, Jake ve Dinos Chapman’ın Arter’de 10 Şubat–7 Mayıs İlkay Baliç 2017 tarihleri arasında gerçekleşen “Anlamsızlık Âleminde” adlı sergisine eşlik etmektedir. Editör | Editor Süreyyya Evren This book accompanies Jake and Dinos Chapman’s exhibition “In the Realm of the Senseless” held at Arter between İngilizceden Türkçeye çeviri 10 February and 7 May 2017. Translation from English to Turkish Süreyyya Evren [12-15] Anlamsızlık Âleminde Özge Çelik - Orhan Kılıç [22-27] In the Realm of the Senseless Zafer Aracagök [34-45] Jake & Dinos Chapman Münevver Çelik - Sinem Özer [60-75] 10/02–07/05/2017 Küratör | Curator: Nick Hackworth Türkçe düzelti | Turkish proofreading Emre Ayvaz Teşekkürler | Acknowledgements İngilizce düzelti | English proofreading Hussam Otaibi Anna Knight ve tüm Floreat ekibi | and everyone at Floreat John McEnroe Gallery Inc. White Cube Kitap Tasarımı | Book Design Vahit Tuna Kâğıt | Paper stock: Munken Pure 120 gr., Furioso 170 gr. Yazı karakterleri | Typefaces: Ehrhardt, Avenir Şömizdeki iş | Work on the book jacket: Jake & Dinos Chapman Yaraya Tuz | Insult to Injury, 2003 Francisco Goya’nın “Büyük Marifet! Ölülere Karşı!”sı, 39. levha, suluboya tatbik edilmiş | Francisco Goya’s “Great Deeds Against the Dead”, plate 39, watercoloured reworked © Jake & Dinos Chapman Baskı ve Cilt | Printing and Binding Ofset Yapımevi Şair Sokak No: 4 Çağlayan Mah. Kağıthane 34410 İstanbul, TR T: + 90 212 295 86 01 Sertifka No: 12326 © 2017 ARTER Tüm Metinler © Yazarlar | All Texts © Authors Tüm yapıtlar | All works © Jake & Dinos Chapman ISBN: 978-605-9606-04-2 Bütün hakları saklıdır. Yasal sınırlar içinde ve kaynak gösterilmek sureti ile yapılabilecek alıntılar dışında her türlü kullanım ve yararlanma, eser/hak sahiplerinin ve yayıncının önceden yazılı iznine tabidir. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise, without seeking the written permission of the copyright holders and of the publishers. ARTER sanat için alan | space for art İstiklal Caddesi No: 211 34433 Beyoğlu, İstanbul, TR T: + 90 212 708 58 00 F: + 90 212 292 07 90 E: [email protected] arter.org.tr Bu yayında çocuklara uygun olmayan şiddet ve cinsellik öğeleri bulunmaktadır. This publication contains mature and explicit subject matter. CHAPMAN 23-01-17.indd 4 24.01.2017 14:58 İçindekiler Contents 12 Nick Hackworth Jake ve Dinos Chapman’ın Kötümserliği The Pessimism of Jake and Dinos Chapman 22 Nick Hackworth’ün Jake Chapman ile Söyleşisi Nick Hackworth in Conversation with Jake Chapman 34 Jake Chapman Yaraya Tuz... ya da Talihlilerin Talihsizlerden Faydalanması... Insult to Injury... or the Utilisation of the Unfortunate by the Fortunate... 60 Cüneyt Çakırlar Estetik Atalet, Dokunaksız Ölüm: Jake ve Dinos Chapman’ın Alabildiğine Banal Sanatı Üzerine Aesthetic Inertia, Bathetic Death: On the Profoundly Banal Art of Jake and Dinos Chapman 156 Sergideki İşler Works in the Exhibition CHAPMAN 23-01-17.indd 8 23.01.2017 17:59 Aesthetic Inertia, Bathetic Death: On the Profoundly Banal Art of Jake and Dinos Chapman Cüneyt Çakırlar The performative agenda of young British artists (yBas) of the 1990s crystallised around an emphasis on non-art, a populist attempt to merge art and life, a refusal of bourgeois conventions of high art, or in more general terms, an artistic philistinism “valuing the denial itself ” (Bull 1996: 25) and allowing the voluptuous to emerge within art practice. Philistinism, as defned by Dave Beech and John Roberts, “accuses the cultivated refnement of the body as a motivated denial of voluptuousness and excess” and contests how “the ethical value of [the modern] art is secured by impoverishing the body and elevating aesthetic experience and art beyond the voluptuous contingencies, activities and delight” (1996: 126; also 1998; 2002). Julian Stallabrass’s critical take on yBa as “high art lite”, however, emphasises its easily consumable intellectual “lightness” and its “lite” re-enactment of avant-gardism: “[yBa] captures the idea of a fast food ver- sion of the less digestible art that preceded it” (Stallabrass 2006: 2). Stallabrass positions these artists in a postmodern political vacuum: A facile postmodernism, the basis for a ubiquitous irony, was the foundation of this new art, one which took no principle terribly seriously, which pretended not to separate high from mass culture and which, given this relativism, accepted the system just as it was, and sought only to work within it. The new art would be quite as dreadful as the philistines said it was – obscene, trivial, soiled with bodily fuids, and exhibiting a fuck-you attitude – but this time to deliberately use the philistines’ energy and power in the mass media against them. [...] The level of recursion of reference in these projects has moved on from what went before: these artists are not so much engaged in masquerade (in putting on an identity as you would a costume) as in a masquerade of masquerade. High art lite is post-psychoanalytic (2006: 26-48). However, what Stallabrass regards as “anti-intellectualism” or ideological emptiness in yBas (e.g. Jake & Dinos Chapman, Tracey Emin, Marcus Harvey, Damien Hirst, Gavin Turk) as well as their “fathers” Gilbert & George, may also be considered as a subversively blank, performative activity that invests in more than a mode of postmod- ern irony and self-consciousness. If one should associate this artistic movement with philistinism, it would be too easy to reduce this association to a critique that either labels yBa as a failed, commoditised lumpen aesthetics or celebrates its presumably trans- gressive temperament. There remains an ambiguity in discussing yBa along the axes of 78 CHAPMAN 23-01-17.indd 78 23.01.2017 17:59 79 success/failure, ethical idealism/capitalist opportunism, adolescent aggression/active nihilism, or transgression/transformation. What deserves particular attention, though, is not the political effciency of the transgressive aesthetic but the object of critique that such a transgressive urge produces. In this sense, the lack of depth, which is framed through blankness, as in simulacrality or Fredric Jameson’s postmodern pastiche (1992), or dumbness, as in what Stallabrass points to as the “burial of intellect” in high art lite, does not always lead to the presumption of an atheoretical, if not anti-theoretical, textuality/visuality in art practice. Departing from this, I would like to explore the art of Jake & Dinos Chapman by focusing on a particular mode of aesthetic inertia that the duo constructs through their use of violence, exposure, death and mimicry. As I see a meaningful continuity, if not a simple linear progression, within the trajectory of their art practice, this discussion will take the form of an overview on the ways in which the artists’ aesthetic strategies evolved, and overlapped, from “Anatomies” (1994-1997) to “Fucking Hell” (2008) and their later experimentations with their earlier work. In this respect, Chapmans’ manifesto “We are Artists” (1991) is a good starting point: We are sore-eyed scopophiliac oxymorons. Or, at least, we are disenfranchised aristocrats, under siege from our feudal heritage. The graphic heritage of our absent but nevertheless sonorous letraset, honours the dead (and the bad con- science) of past generations, a recollection of the discordance between concepts and pictures. Our discourse offers a benevolent contingency of concepts, a dis- course of end-of-sale remnants, a rationalistic hotbed of sober categories. We have manufactured our products according to the market demands of a decon- structive imperative, and policed them according to the rules of an industrial dispute – our bread is buttered on both sides. We have always already been func- tions of a discourse; in short, our subjectivity (our labor) deserves profession- al interpretation, our mental agitation demands a limitless expressionism, our contractual teleology demonstrates our servility to a cultural climax never to be experienced. The future remains excluded. But sometimes against the freedom of work, we phantasise emancipation from this liberal polity, into a superheav- yweight no-holds-barred all-in mud wrestling league, a scatological aesthetics, for the tired of seeing (Chapmans in Grunenberg & Barson [1991] 2007: 82-3). This statement attempts to enact an artistic subjectivity in the form of a capitalistic Cüneyt Çakırlar, Aesthetic Inertia, Bathetic Death: On the Profoundly Banal Art of Jake and Dinos Chapman CHAPMAN 23-01-17.indd 79 23.01.2017 17:59 desiring-machine. Taking art as manufacturing a product “according to the market de- mands of a deconstructive imperative”, the artists appear to embody and appropriate the postmodern condition in contemporary art practice – as a symptom of advanced late capitalism. They declare an objective to mimic its logic through their artistic labour. In this sense, in search for a “cultural climax never to be experienced”, the artists, through- out their oeuvre, demonstrate and visualise their perverse interest in a phantasmagoria of dysfunctional forms of such artistic labour: an anti-aesthetic that invests in failures of representation (i.e.
Recommended publications
  • Sculpture in the City 2017
    Join the conversation #sculptureinthecity Sculpture in the City is an annual urban sculpture park located in the insurance district of the Square Mile and surrounded by the iconic towers that define the area. Every summer, the City of London, with support from /visitthecity @sculpturecity @visitthecity local businesses, unveils a brand new selection of www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/sculptureinthecity public art by major and internationally acclaimed artists. World class contemporary sculpture complements the unique architectural quality of the area and engages the passers-by, who range from local workers to architectural tourists and animates one of the most dynamic parts of the City of London. An official partner of Sculpture in the City The 2017 edition is now the seventh in the series which has shown 70 artists to date and continues to grow from strength to strength. If you are interested in being involved please contact the team at [email protected] Scan the art, uncover the story Download the app to uncover the stories behind the sculptures 1 AJAR 2 THE BLACK HORSE GAVIN TURK MARK WALLINGER © Nick Turpin © Nick Turpin 2011 2015 PAINTED BRONZE BRONZE, RESIN, STAINLESS STEEL 229 x 103 x 66 cm 196 x 273 x 67 cm COPYRIGHT THE ARTIST COPYRIGHT THE ARTIST COURTESY OF THE ARTIST & AEROPLASTICS CONTEMPORARY COURTESY OF THE ARTIST & HAUSER & WIRTH As a direct reference to the painting ‘La Victoire’ by Rene Magritte, Ajar The sculpture was made with the help of advanced technology, scanning is a surreal gateway: a spiritual journey through the imagination, an a racehorse, part owned by the artist, named Rivera Red.
    [Show full text]
  • Londra Al Centro Dell Scena Artistica: La Yung British Art Dalla Conferenza Del 12-05-2011 Del Prof
    Londra al centro dell scena artistica: La Yung British Art Dalla conferenza del 12-05-2011 del prof. Francesco Poli a cura del prof. Mario Diegol i Sensation e la YBA (Young British Artists) Il 28 dicembre del 1997 presso la Royal Academy of Art di Londra il collezionista d’arte contemporanea Charles Saatchi organizza la mostra Sensation in cui espone le opere della Yung British Art. La mostra è, in seguito, riproposta a Berl ino e New York e diventa, grazie all’abilità manageriale di Saatchi e alla sua rete di contatt i sviluppata negl i anni precedenti con la sua att ività di pubbl icitario, l’evento artistico del momento e un riferimento importante per il mercato dell’arte portando alla ribalta una serie di giovani art isti inglesi come: Jake & Dinos Chapman, Adam Chodzko, Mat Coll ishaw, Tracey Emin, Marcus Harvey, Damien Hirst, Gary Hume, Michael Landy, Abigail Lane, Sarah Lucas, Chris Ofil i, Richard Patterson, Simon Patterson, Marc Quinn, Fiona Rae, Sam Taylor-Wood, Gavin Turk, Gill ian Wearing, Rachel Whiteread. Gl i artist i della Yung British Art propongono opere che sol itamente tendono a stupire e a provocare lo spettatore. Sono giovani nati negl i anni sessanta che impiegano linguaggi differenti non sempre omologabil i alle tradizional i espressioni plastiche e visive anche se ne recuperano a volte i material i (la pittura, la scultura in marmo) mischiandoli o alternandol i all’impiego di oggetti, fotograf ie, material i plastici, stoffe ecc.. Il manifesto della mostra Sensation con cui evocano e amplificano storie personal i e collettive dove il soggetto e il contenuto prevalgono sulla forma: una forma a volte iperreal istica, in altri casi mostruosa e raccapricciante ampl ificata da dimensioni che possono assumere una scala monumentale.
    [Show full text]
  • Jake & Dinos Chapman
    Jake & Dinos Chapman Dinos Chapman, born in 1962, London, UK and Jake Chapman, born 1966, Cheltenham, UK, currently live and work in Los Angeles/London. EDUCATION DINOS CHAPMAN 1981 B.A., Ravensbourne College of Art 1990 M.A., Royal College of Art JAKE CHAPMAN 1988 B.A., North East London Polytechnic 1990 M.A., Royal College of Art AWARDS 2003 Winners of the Royal Academy of Arts Charles Wollaston Award (at the Summer Exhibition) Nominated for Turner Prize Bring Me the Head of..., Edition of 200, 7 mins, published by Ridinghouse Editions, London SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 The Rainbow of Human Kindness, HE.RO Gallery, Amsterdam, NL (forthcoming) 2018 Jake & Dinos Chapman: March of The Banal, ARoS Aarhus Kunstmuseum, DK 2017 The Disasters of War, The Goya Museum, Zaragoza, Spain The Disasters of Everyday Life, Blain|Southern, London, UK Jake & Dinos Chapman, Cass Sculpture Foundation, New Barn Hill, Goodwood, UK In the Realm of the Senseless, ARTER, Istanbul, TR 2016 Back to the End of the Beginning of the End Again, Kammel Mennour, Paris, FR The Nature of Particles, Magasin III, Stockholm, SE 2015 Homage to Freud, Eggs and Bacon, Gabriel Rolt, Amsterdam, NL Ruminations on Cosmic Insignificance, Brandts Museum, Odense, DK 2014 Come, Hell or High Water, David Risley Gallery, Copenhagen, DK In the Realm of the Unmentionable, Jerwood Gallery, Hastings, UK 2013 Come and See, Serpentine Sackler Gallery, London, UK; travelled to DHC/, Montreal, CA The Sleep of Reason, Songeun Artspace Museum, Seoul, KR The Sum of all Evil, White Cube, Hong Kong, CN The Blind Leading the Blind, Galerie Rudolfinum, Prague, CZ Exquisite Corpse, Jerwood Gallery, London, UK Chicken, Pinchuk Art Centre, Kiev, UR 2012 The End of Fun, The Hermitage, St.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ART of CHESS 8 September – 3 October 2012
    Photography by Norbert Schoerner. Courtesy of RS&A THE ART OF CHESS 8 September – 3 October 2012 presented by SAATCHI GALLERY and RS&A in association with “From my close contact with artists and chess players I have come to the personal conclusion that while all artists are not chess players, all chess players are artists.” Marcel Duchamp, 1952. The Art of Chess brings together 16 chess sets designed by some of the world’s leading contemporary artists in celebration of the ‘game of kings’ and its continued relevance to the creative arts. These specially commissioned chess sets have been created by: Maurizio Cattelan, Jake and Dinos Chapman, Oliver Clegg, Tracey Emin, Tom Friedman, Paul Fryer, Damien Hirst, Barbara Kruger, Yayoi Kusama, Paul McCarthy, Alastair Mackie, Tim Noble and Sue Webster, Matthew Ronay,Tunga, Gavin Turk and Rachel Whiteread. Each set is individually crafted in a wide variety of different materials including wood, porcelain, glass, amber and silver. This exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery will be the first time that all 16 chess sets are displayed together and it will also be the first public showing of a new commission by British artists Tim Noble and Sue Webster. Famous for their shadow sculptures, the artists have taken the opportunity to return to their on-going fascination with dead animals and have created a woodland chess set complete with hand carved tree stump with bronze chess pieces inspired by the artists’ collection of mummified animals - found on their farm in Gloucestershire - squirrels take the roles of King and Queen and frogs act as Pawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Mark Callaghan Typeset Revised
    Mark Callaghan is a Ph.D candidate at Birkbeck, University of London. Mark's thesis concerns the Berlin Holocaust Memorial Competition of the 1990s, a VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1 SUMMER 2014 contest which resulted in The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. Mark also teaches on contemporary memory culture, and is Lecturer in 20th Century European Art at The Highgate Institute, London. Mark is a graduate of Oxford University and the University of Manchester. [email protected] Exhibition Review ‘Jake and Dinos Chapman: Come and See’ Serpentine Sackler Gallery, 29 November 2013 to 9 February 2014 Mark Callaghan / __________________________________________ The Chapman Brothers have been having a laugh for twenty years. They are the clowns of contemporary art, mischievously mocking the notion of causing offence, would-be progeny of the Marquis de Sade, ridiculing an art world that continues to endorse them. According to the conservative press, in general, the joke has been at our expense. These fraternal collaborators have always been ‘getting away with it’, producing Viz comic-style humour under the auspices of patrons who have more money than aesthetic or conceptual sense. Where is the artistic merit? Where is the skill, the craftsmanship? Why are they always trying to alarm us? Even The Independent’s review of this exhibition claims that the Chapmans ‘still have the power to shock’ though to be shocked is to demote the weight of dark humour that pervades their work.1 It also causes me to wonder whether the writer in question has ever seen the television news, or even the pages of their own newspaper, for that matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Exhibition
    GALERIE THADDAEUS ROPAC GROUP EXHIBITION SEX AND THE BRITISH SALZBURG VILLA KAST 15 Apr 2000 - 03 Jun 2000 SLAP AND TICKLE A perspective on the sexual content of British Art since the 1960s An exhibition under the curatorship of Norman Rosenthal and Max Wigram Great art has often been inspired and driven by Eros. When we talk about eroticism and sex in art, we touch the most original source of artistic inspiration. Important intemationally renowned British artists such as Francis Bacon, Lucian Freud or David Hockney have repeatedly used sex as a leitmotif for their works, indeed their work has even depended on it. Far from being uptight about sex, these artists have explored areas of sexual practice with a graphic opemiess that never shies away from controversy. Besides significant works by Gilbert + George this exhibition brings together the most sensual exhibits of a younger generation of artists, showing fascinating representations of erotic and sexual motifs in art. The explosive development of British art since 1990 owes much to the Vanguard, which paved the way in the 1960s and l970s. Sex has become even more of a major theme in the work of the so-called YBA's (Young British Artists). Sex is nothing to shy away from nor is its fantasy to be disputed because of its frank inclusion in much of contemporary British work. Using the contemporary energy of shock and more traditional ideas of beauty this exhibition contains some extremely explicit and provocative works. It confronts issues of pomography, homosexuality and amorality with a directness that will subsequently make the British and sex appear in a new light.
    [Show full text]
  • THBT Social Disgust Is Legitimate Grounds for Restriction of Artistic Expression
    Published on idebate.org (http://idebate.org) Home > THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression The history of art is full of pieces which, at various points in time, have caused controversy, or sparked social disgust. The works most likely to provoke disgust are those that break taboos surrounding death, religion and sexual norms. Often, the debate around whether a piece is too ‘disgusting’ is interwoven with debate about whether that piece actually constitutes a work of art: people seem more willing to accept taboo-breaking pieces if they are within a clearly ‘artistic’ context (compare, for example, reactions to Michelangelo’s David with reactions to nudity elsewhere in society). As a consequence, the debate on the acceptability of shocking pieces has been tied up, at least in recent times, with the debate surrounding the acceptability of ‘conceptual art’ as art at all. Conceptual art1 is that which places an idea or concept (rather than visual effect) at the centre of the work. Marchel Duchamp is ordinarily considered to have begun the march towards acceptance of conceptual art, with his most famous piece, Fountain, a urinal signed with the pseudonym “R. Mutt”. It is popularly associated with the Turner Prize and the Young British Artists. This debate has a degree of scope with regards to the extent of the restriction of artistic expression that might be being considered here. Possible restrictions include: limiting display of some pieces of art to private collections only; withdrawing public funding (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Authoring Advanced Art
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-Century Art Volume Author/Editor: David W. Galenson Volume Publisher: Cambridge University Press Volume ISBN: 978-0-521-11232-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/gale08-1 Publication Date: October 2009 Title: Co-Authoring Advanced Art Author: David W. Galenson URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5793 Chapter 10: Co-Authoring Advanced Art Introduction Consistent co-authorship of painting or other works of advanced visual art did not occur prior to the late twentieth century. In recent decades, however, this practice has been followed by a handful of teams of important artists. Yet the history of visual artists working together suggests that co-authorship is likely to become more widespread in the future, and for this reason the practice is of greater interest than would be warranted by the limited number of artists who have already adopted it. A brief survey of this history can help us to understand its recent emergence. Before Modern Art Joint production of paintings was an accepted practice in the Renaissance, as eminent masters presided over studios that might comprise dozens of students and assistants. So for example Vasari reported that when Raphael became successful he employed a large number of assistants and “was never seen at court without some fifty painters.”1 John Pope-Hennessy noted that in this phase of his career “Raphael over a large part of his work became an ideator instead of an executant,” as he made detailed preparatory drawings or cartoons for works that would then be painted by assistants.2 Raphael’s practice of having his plans executed by others was a consequence of his conceptual approach to art, for he clearly considered the essence of his works to lie in their conception.
    [Show full text]
  • London Gallery Map Summer 2018 Galleriesnow.Net for Latest Info Visit Galleriesnow.Net
    GalleriesNow.net for latest info visit GalleriesNow.net London Gallery Map Summer 2018 21 Jun Impressionist & A Blain|Southern 5E Modern Works on Paper Flowers Gallery, Luxembourg & Dayan 6F Partners & Mucciaccia 6G Repetto Gallery 5F S Simon Lee 5G Sotheby’s S|2 Gallery 5E Victoria Miro Mayfair 5E Kingsland Road 3A Achille Salvagni 28 Jun Handpicked: 50 Sadie Coles HQ ITION Atelier 5F Works Selected by the S Davies Street 5F SUPERIMPO Saatchi Gallery SITION SUPERIMPO 28 Jun Post-War to Present Land of Lads, Land of Lashes 30 Jun–12 Jul Classic Week Upstairs: Charlotte ‘Snapshot’ Aftermath: Art in the Wake of 25 Jun–11 Aug 3 Jul Old Master & British Johannesson 29 Jun–1 Jul World War One Edward Kienholz: America Drawings & Watercolours Ely House, 37 Dover St, 25 May–30 Jun René Magritte (Or: The Rule Superimposition | Paul Michele Zaza Viewing Room: Joel Mesler: Signals 5 Jun–23 Sep Surface Work 28 Cork St, W1S 3NG Morrison, Barry Reigate, My Hometown Lorenzo Vitturi: Money Must W1S 4NJ of Metaphor) 18 May–15 Jun The Alphabet of Creation 27 Apr–13 Jul 11 Apr–16 Jun 4 Jul Treasured Portraits 1-2 Warner Yard, EC1R 5EY 10am-6pm mon-fri, 11am- Michael Stubbs, Mark (for now) Millbank, SW1P 4RG 18 May–14 Jul from the Collection of Ernst Be Made 10am-6pm tue-sat 27 Feb–26 May Apollo 11am-6pm wed-fri, 4pm sat Titchner Nudes 20 Apr–26 May 31 St George St, W1S 2FJ 10am-6pm daily Erkka Nissinen Holzscheiter 11 May–30 Jun 2 Savile Row, W1S 3PA 15 Mar–7 Sep noon-5pm sat 15 Jun–31 Aug 11 Apr–26 May 10am-5pm mon-fri 23 May–14 Jul 5 Jul Old Masters Evening
    [Show full text]
  • William Gropper's
    US $25 The Global Journal of Prints and Ideas March – April 2014 Volume 3, Number 6 Artists Against Racism and the War, 1968 • Blacklisted: William Gropper • AIDS Activism and the Geldzahler Portfolio Zarina: Paper and Partition • Social Paper • Hieronymus Cock • Prix de Print • Directory 2014 • ≤100 • News New lithographs by Charles Arnoldi Jesse (2013). Five-color lithograph, 13 ¾ x 12 inches, edition of 20. see more new lithographs by Arnoldi at tamarind.unm.edu March – April 2014 In This Issue Volume 3, Number 6 Editor-in-Chief Susan Tallman 2 Susan Tallman On Fierce Barbarians Associate Publisher Miguel de Baca 4 Julie Bernatz The Geldzahler Portfoio as AIDS Activism Managing Editor John Murphy 10 Dana Johnson Blacklisted: William Gropper’s Capriccios Makeda Best 15 News Editor Twenty-Five Artists Against Racism Isabella Kendrick and the War, 1968 Manuscript Editor Prudence Crowther Shaurya Kumar 20 Zarina: Paper and Partition Online Columnist Jessica Cochran & Melissa Potter 25 Sarah Kirk Hanley Papermaking and Social Action Design Director Prix de Print, No. 4 26 Skip Langer Richard H. Axsom Annu Vertanen: Breathing Touch Editorial Associate Michael Ferut Treasures from the Vault 28 Rowan Bain Ester Hernandez, Sun Mad Reviews Britany Salsbury 30 Programs for the Théâtre de l’Oeuvre Kate McCrickard 33 Hieronymus Cock Aux Quatre Vents Alexandra Onuf 36 Hieronymus Cock: The Renaissance Reconceived Jill Bugajski 40 The Art of Influence: Asian Propaganda Sarah Andress 42 Nicola López: Big Eye Susan Tallman 43 Jane Hammond: Snapshot Odyssey On the Cover: Annu Vertanen, detail of Breathing Touch (2012–13), woodcut on Maru Rojas 44 multiple sheets of machine-made Kozo papers, Peter Blake: Found Art: Eggs Unique image.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Institute of Contemporary Arts PRESS RELEASE ICA Artists’ Editions + Paul Stolper Gallery 12 January – 16 February 2019 Opening Friday 11 January, 6–8pm Paul Stolper Gallery Frances Stark, Proposal for a Peace Poster, 2017. Silkscreen print with deboss elements, 67 × 67 cm, Edition of 10 (2AP) ICA Artists’ Editions and Paul Stolper Gallery collaborate for the first time to present a joint exhibition of artists’ editions at Paul Stolper Gallery, opening 12 January 2019. The exhibition showcases a collection of rare editions from Peter Blake, Adam Chodzko, Mat Collishaw, Keith Coventry, Jeremy Deller, Brian Eno, Marcus Harvey, Jenny Holzer, Roger Hiorns, Gary Hume, Sarah Lucas, Vinca Petersen, Peter Saville, Bob and Roberta Smith, Frances Stark, Gavin Turk and Cerith Wyn Evans. The exhibition provides an opportunity to view a selection of important editions from the last 40 years: from Peter Blake’s Art Jak, commissioned by the ICA in 1978 to raise funds for the institution, to Jeremy Deller’s iconic and catalysing print The History of the World, published by Paul Stolper in 1998, to Jenny Holzer’s pivotal Inflammatory Essays, first fly-posted around New York in the late 1970s and then created as an edition for the ICA in 1993. www.ica.art The Mall London SW1Y 5AH +44 (0)20 7930 0493 Tracking the course of editions produced by ground-breaking artists such as Cerith Wyn Evans and Sarah Lucas, the exhibition explores the potential of the format and the numerous ways that artists have engaged with the editioning method of creation. The exhibition is inspired by conversations between Paul Stolper, Stefan Kalmár (ICA Director) and Charlotte Barnard (ICA Artists’ Editions) on the radical history and potential of the editioned artwork, which can free the artist from the demands of their primary practice or gallery expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000
    British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth British Art Studies Issue 3, published 4 July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth Cover image: Installation View, Simon Starling, Project for a Masquerade (Hiroshima), 2010–11, 16 mm film transferred to digital (25 minutes, 45 seconds), wooden masks, cast bronze masks, bowler hat, metals stands, suspended mirror, suspended screen, HD projector, media player, and speakers. Dimensions variable. Digital image courtesy of the artist PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/advisory-board Produced in the United Kingdom. A joint publication by Contents Sensational Cities, John J.
    [Show full text]