The Brian Sewell Archive an Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Brian Sewell Archive an Introduction DRAWING ROOM DISPLAYS The Brian Sewell Archive An Introduction 8 May - 8 September 2017 Item 22 Introduction This display features material from Sewell’s early childhood to the the Brian Sewell Archive which end of his days. From passports to was donated to the Paul Mellon diaries, press-cuttings, postcards, Centre in July 2016. The work photographs, programmes, letters, of reviewing the collection has and even a portrait [see item 1], it is been ongoing since it entered the all here: the rich tapestry of a life. building and—whilst this task is not This display contains only a small yet complete—the key aim of this selection from the huge volume display is to provide an introduction and wealth of material. Alongside to the archive. With the display now a biographical section, the items open and the archive collection chosen fall into three main themes available for consultation, this is the which reflect, perhaps, some of the first time that any of the items have most important aspects of his life been seen by the public. and the contents of the archive. Despite a cull undertaken by These are: “the Blunt affair”; travel; Sewell as his health deteriorated, and art criticism and controversy. the archive contains material from There was, of course, a across his life, thereby reflecting huge amount that did not the Centre’s current acquisition make the “final cut”. A more policy in this area.1 When the detailed summary can be found material was transferred to the in the boxlist available on our Centre, it comprised a total of website, but a few highlights seventy bankers boxes. It was include material relating to: The already known that the first forty of Transatlantic Review, the literary these contained material relating to magazine run by Sewell’s friend Sewell’s journalistic output, with the Joseph F. McCrindle (including contents having been meticulously letters from John Updike, Iris arranged by him into two main Murdoch, Samuel Beckett etc.); sequences: the largest concerning Sewell’s extensive research art and the arts and a smaller group on fakes and forgeries; his of material concerning his writings television, radio, and theatre on any other subject matter. The work; his huge and diverse range remaining thirty boxes contained of friends and acquaintances a diverse range of completely (including John Craxton, Tom unorganized material dating from Keating, and Charles Saatchi, to 2 name but a few) as well as, of Wall, to left of display text course, his love of dogs and cars. The archive documents not 1 only Sewell’s own life and work, Zsuzsi Roboz, “Brian Sewell—Stormy but also reveals much about Weather”, 2002, sanguine and the art world in the UK from the charcoal on paper, 66 × 51cm AR: TN1 1950s to the 2010s. This fact was clearly recognized by his friends during his lifetime. A letter sent to Sewell in 2012 from Julia Gahlin, an independent dealer and friend, implores Sewell, “please do not destroy your papers. The future may have a use for them that we alive in our present cannot conceive of” —a sentiment with which all who have worked on the collection would wholeheartedly agree.2 The Brian Sewell Archive is yet to be catalogued in detail, but if you are interested in consulting it, please contact collections staff by emailing collections@paul-mellon- centre.ac.uk 3 Upright Display Case Brian Sewell: A Biography Brian Sewell was born Brian Perkins Sewell’s early years were on 15 July 1931. He was brought up dominated by trips to the theatre, in Kensington, West London, by his ballet, opera, galleries, and mother Mary Jessica Perkins and— museums of London, where he from 1936—his stepfather, Robert was exposed to a wide range of Sewell. Although the relationship artistic and cultural experiences. with his mother was not always It was on one of these trips, at a happy one, he was incredibly the age of four, that he was taken close to her throughout her life. to the National Gallery and was Significantly, the archive contains held spellbound by Murillo’s The not only material compiled and Heavenly Earth and Trinities and collected by Sewell, but also a Dürer’s The Madonna with the volume of material generated by his Iris. The programmes for these mother. Alongside items she sent to events—often marked “Brian & him [see item 2], there is material Mammy” and with the names that she carefully collected, cut out of anyone else in attendance, and set aside for his interest, as together with the date—were well as the records she made of the clearly important to him as they events in his life [see item 10]. survived the cull and have been Educated at home until the age carefully preserved [see item 3]. of eleven, Sewell’s childhood was unconventional and somewhat disjointed. He grew up not knowing the identity of his real father, changing his name from Perkins to Sewell in 1942. It was only on his mother’s death that the identity of his real father—the composer Philip Heseltine, whose pen name was Peter Warlock—was revealed to him. Warlock killed himself seven months before his son was born. Item 2 5 Item 3 At the age of eleven Sewell became compulsory National Service and he a day boy at Haberdashers’ Aske’s, an received his commission in 1953, at independent school in Hampstead. He the rank of Subaltern. Demobilized in was a reluctant and wilful pupil who did 1954, he described his two years in not always make a good impression on the army as one of the happiest times his masters. By the age of seventeen of his life. There he learned how to he was studying English, History, Art, get on with people and formed lasting and French. His school reports from friendships with some of his fellow this time—preserved in the archive— soldiers, in particular John Peile and hint at the skills that were later to earn Nigel Hensman [see item 5]. him a living [see item 4]: Sewell was offered a place to read history at Oxford, but chose instead English: “the liveliness of his ideas to enrol at the Courtauld Institute and quickness of appreciation are of Art in London—a decision that pleasing” altered the entire course of his life. Excelling at his studies, he developed English History: “most of his a keen eye and a passion for the written work is very promising subjects that were to fascinate him but some of his essays are wild for the rest of his life. In 1955 he went and uncontrolled.” travelling with five fellow students on a mini “grand tour” [see item 6]. In 1952 Sewell joined the Royal Army Service Corps to complete Item 5 It was also at the Courtauld that unofficial spokesperson and he first came to the attention of sheltered him from the press. Anthony Blunt (Director, 1947–74). Material in the archive reveals that Sewell found Blunt an inspiration media coverage of this episode and the two formed a strong was extensive. It also shows how friendship that was to last for the invasive this was for Sewell: on rest of their lives. Material from 17 November 1979, for example, the archive reveals that from 1958 Sewell’s mother noted that there onwards Sewell regularly sought were sixteen callers (phone and Blunt’s advice on professional in-person) to the house [see item matters and they frequently 10]. For more about this episode dined together and spoke on the see pages 16-19 and the small telephone [see item 8]. display case. After graduating Sewell took It was Sewell’s honesty and a job at Christie’s, where he outspokenness throughout the specialized in Old Master paintings “Blunt affair” that led to his first and drawings [see item 7]. He job as a critic. Tina Brown, editor enjoyed the work of attribution, of Tatler magazine, offered him but was never entirely happy in £100 to write a thousand words the position, believing that “the for the magazine ten times a job is not really worth doing” [see year. His first piece, a review of item 8]. In 1967 he established an exhibition of works by Dalí at himself as an independent dealer, the Tate Gallery, was published and continued buying, selling and in June 1980 [see item 11]. collecting art for the rest of his life [see item 9]. It was Sewell’s friendship with Blunt that first brought him to public attention. In November 1979, when Blunt was exposed as the fourth man in the Cambridge spy ring, Sewell acted as his Item 4 9 Item 10 Sewell remained at Tatler until the route many Grand Tourists of 1990, but had meanwhile secured the eighteenth century would have additional writing responsibilities. taken. To listen to an excerpt from Most significantly, in 1984 he this programme please scan the became a critic for the Evening QR code on page 15 [see item 15]. Standard, and was commissioned In this excerpt Sewell discusses to write on both the arts and the city of Turin (which was often a multitude of other subjects. an early sojourn on the itinerary) He was hugely successful in the and its abundance of churches. He role, winning many awards and visits the Church of San Lorenzo publishing two compendium and describes what it would have volumes of some of his best work been like for a young Grand Tourist [see item 12]. For more about to be faced with the grandeur of a Sewell’s journalism see pages 24- Catholic church for the first time, 32 and the large display case.
Recommended publications
  • Who Owns the Art World? an Online Panel Discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This Short Panel
    A DACS panel discussion, 14 March 2018 Who Owns the Art World? An online panel discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This short panel debate took place during DACS’ Annual Strategy Day, as we thought about the context in which artists are currently working and how best DACS could best support artists and artists’ estates in the future. The Panel Mark Waugh (Chair) is the Business Development Director at DACS. Hayley Newman, Artist and Reader of Fine Art, Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. Morgan Quaintance, writer, musician, broadcaster and curator. Richard Parry, Artist. Mark Waugh (MW): Welcome, and we’re live again at DACS, this time from RIBA, and we’re live with a specific question, it’s quite a simple question – “Who Owns the Art World?” And to answer that, what we’re going to have three presentations, one from Richard Parry, one from Hayley Newman and one from Morgan Quaintance. They come from very particular positions and I think you’ll be able to understand what those positions are after the presentations. Essentially, all three of them share a discourtesy of concern with that question of ownership - and not only the ownership of the art world in a conceptual and a material sense - but also in what the role and agency of the artist is, and indeed, art is, in that context. And we’re asking that in the context of DACS as an organisation which has a 30-year history of thinking about what artists can do to empower themselves and support each other.
    [Show full text]
  • My Article in the Last Issue of Finch's Quarterly About the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition Achieved a Very Modest Degree
    Hungary for Culture Charles Saumarez Smith takes issue with the line of Brian (Sewell) and looks forward to the Royal Academy’s Treasures from Budapest exhibition My article in the last issue of Finch’s Quarterly about the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition achieved a modest degree of fame by being quoted in Brian Sewell’s review of this year’s exhibition in the Evening Standard: As its chief executive put it in the current edition of a journal of which he is arts editor, the Academy holds “the 18th-century view that the best judges of art are not the critics but the public. Critics may sneer, but the public continues to enjoy the Summer Exhibition precisely because it gives them an opportunity to make up their own minds about what to like.” Sewell went on to say: The public can make up its mind about fish and chips and jellied eels, but to put it in charge of the kitchens of The Ritz would not be wise. And I am less sure that Charles Saumarez Smith’s contempt for critics was widely held anywhere in Europe in the 18th century, the Age of Reason, when the Enlightenment held sway; and even if it were, then the public to which he refers was not the ancestor of some bloke on the Clapham bendy-bus, but an educated gentleman with the benefits of private tutoring, Eton, Oxbridge and the Grand Tour, as ready with a Greek or Latin tag as our beloved Boris Johnson. The chief executive will find little of that background among the old biddies from Berkshire up for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Shawcross
    CONRAD SHAWCROSS Born 1977 in London, UK Lives and works in London, UK Education 2001 MFA, Slade School of Art, University College, London, UK 1999 BA (Hons), Fine Art, Ruskin School of Art, Oxford, UK 1996 Foundation, Chelsea School of Art, London, UK Permanent Commissions 2022 Manifold 5:4, Crossrail Art Programme, Liverpool Street station, Elizabeth line, London, UK ​ ​ 2020 Schism Pavilion, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Pioneering Places, Ramsgate Royal Harbour, Ramsgate, UK ​ ​ 2019 Bicameral, Chelsea Barracks, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ 2018 Exploded Paradigm, Comcast Technology Centre, Philadelphia, USA ​ 2017 Beijing Canopy, Guo Rui Square, Beijing, China ​ 2016 The Optic Cloak, The Energy Centre Greenwich Peninsula, curated by Futurecity, London, UK ​ Paradigm, Francis Crick Institute, curated by Artwise, London, UK ​ 2015 Three Perpetual Chords, Dulwich Park, curated and managed by the Contemporary Art Society for ​ Southwark Council, London, UK 2012 Canopy Study, 123 Victoria Street, London, UK ​ 2010 Fraction (9:8), Sadler Building, Oxford Science Park, curated and managed by Modus Operandi, Oxford, ​ UK 2009 Axiom (Tower), Ministry of Justice, London, UK ​ 2007 Space Trumpet, Unilever House, London, UK ​ Solo Exhibitions 2020 Conrad Shawcross, an extended reality (XR) exhibition on Vortic Collect, Victoria Miro, London, UK ​ ​ Escalations, Château la Coste, Le Puy-Sainte-Réparade, France ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Celebrating 800 years of Spirit and Endeavour, Salisbury Cathedral, Salisbury,
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 the Preternatural Beauty and Equipoise of the Post-War Alexander Calder Mobiles
    REVISED 4/27/2013 VERTIGINOUS ACEDIE, CIRCA 2013 The preternatural beauty and equipoise of the post-war Alexander Calder mobiles at Pace Gallery, Burlington Gardens, London, are more than offset/countered by the vertiginous acedie of the exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London, entitled “Gaiety is the Most Outstanding Feature of the Soviet Union: New Art from Russia.” Foremost in the latter instance is the series “The Neighbors” by Vikenti Nilin (born 1971). This series of ten images, all black-and-white giclée prints of the exact same size (165 x 110 cm.), is absolutely stunning – and chilling. Image (left) – Vikenti Nilin, “The Neighbors,” Saatchi Gallery, Sloan Square, London One needs to walk the length of Green Park, Hyde Park, and Kensington Gardens to properly prepare oneself for Calder (“Calder After the War”) versus the new Russian photography at Saatchi. (In preparation, one could even stop at the Natural History Museum in Knightsbridge for “Genesis,” semi-objective documentary photography by Sebastião Salgado, if crowds and entrance fees are acceptable.) The Calder mobiles are all installed on two floors in a classic, modernist white gallery at the north end of the Royal Academy, the whiteness of the spaces a tribute to the extreme austerities of the Calder mobiles and stabiles – the path to abstraction fully developed by 1945, the works shown covering the years 1945 to 1949. Curiously or not, Calder’s ascendance also coincides with the slow decline of the modernist avant-garde, which by 1927 was more or less over. This is a contentious issue, but it is more than borne out by the commoditization of modern art well underway by the mid- 1920s and the peculiar turn by Joan Miró into the repetition of his previously anarchic canon principally for the emergent modernist art market – a similar practice that beset Moholy-Nagy, Kandinsky, and others, primarily while in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2009 April 2009
    national museum directors’ council April 2009 Welcome to NMDC's monthly news update from the museum sector and beyond. Highlights in this issue: NMDC changes - new Chair, Executive Committee, website and contact details Peer Review of DCMS sponsored museums London Mayor's £3m plans to boost tourism Scottish Government funding for museums Museums encouraged to sign informal adult learning pledge Art Fund Director steps down In Parliament - 1/5 archaeologists out of work; praise for Science Museum and Darwin200 Recession hits US museums - Met endowment loses £800m National Museums' news: British Museum and Tate unveil expansion plans, British Library to lend Lindisfarne Gospels National Museum Jobs - details of current vacancies around the UK NMDC NEWS New Chair of NMDC Dr Michael Dixon, Director of the Natural History Museum, took over as Chair of the National Museum Directors’ Conference on 1 April, succeeding Mark Jones, Director of the V&A. Michael Dixon has been Director of The Natural History Museum since June 2004 and is currently overseeing the completion of the five year £78m project to deliver the second phase of the Museum’s Darwin Centre, which opens in September. Michael was previously Director General of The Zoological Society of London, and before that worked for twenty years in the scientific, technical and medical publishing industry. Michael has been a member of NMDC’s Executive Committee and chaired the Learning and Access Committee for the past two years. During 2006/7 he was acting Chief Scientific Adviser to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). New NMDC Executive Committee NMDC’s executive committee also has new membership.
    [Show full text]
  • THBT Social Disgust Is Legitimate Grounds for Restriction of Artistic Expression
    Published on idebate.org (http://idebate.org) Home > THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression THBT social disgust is legitimate grounds for restriction of artistic expression The history of art is full of pieces which, at various points in time, have caused controversy, or sparked social disgust. The works most likely to provoke disgust are those that break taboos surrounding death, religion and sexual norms. Often, the debate around whether a piece is too ‘disgusting’ is interwoven with debate about whether that piece actually constitutes a work of art: people seem more willing to accept taboo-breaking pieces if they are within a clearly ‘artistic’ context (compare, for example, reactions to Michelangelo’s David with reactions to nudity elsewhere in society). As a consequence, the debate on the acceptability of shocking pieces has been tied up, at least in recent times, with the debate surrounding the acceptability of ‘conceptual art’ as art at all. Conceptual art1 is that which places an idea or concept (rather than visual effect) at the centre of the work. Marchel Duchamp is ordinarily considered to have begun the march towards acceptance of conceptual art, with his most famous piece, Fountain, a urinal signed with the pseudonym “R. Mutt”. It is popularly associated with the Turner Prize and the Young British Artists. This debate has a degree of scope with regards to the extent of the restriction of artistic expression that might be being considered here. Possible restrictions include: limiting display of some pieces of art to private collections only; withdrawing public funding (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review Are Intended Director on His fi Rst Visit to the Gallery
    THE April – March NATIONAL GALLEY TH E NATIONAL GALLEY April – March – Contents Introduction 5 In June , Dr Nicholas Penny announced During Nicholas Penny’s directorship, overall Director’s Foreword 8 his intention to retire as Director of the National visitor numbers have grown steadily, year on year; Gallery. The handover to his successor, Dr Gabriele in , they stood at some . million while in Acquisitions 10 Finaldi, will take place in August . The Board they reached over . million. Furthermore, Loans 17 looks forward to welcoming Dr Finaldi back to this remarkable increase has taken place during a Conservation 24 the Gallery, where he worked as a curator from period when our resource Grant in Aid has been Framing 28 to . falling. One of the key objectives of the Gallery Exhibitions 32 This, however, is the moment at which to over the last few years has been to improve the Displays 44 refl ect on the directorship of Nicholas Penny, experience for this growing group of visitors, Education 48 the eminent scholar who has led the Gallery so and to engage them more closely with the Scientifi c Research 52 successfully since February . As Director, Gallery and its collection. This year saw both Research and Publications 55 his fi rst priority has been the security, preservation the introduction of Wi-Fi and the relaxation Public and Private Support of the Gallery 60 and enhanced display of the Gallery’s pre-eminent of restrictions on photography, changes which Trustees and Committees of the National Gallery Board 66 collection of Old Master paintings for the benefi t of have been widely welcomed by our visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • 'This Will Be a Popular Picture': Giovanni Battista Moroni's Tailor and the Female Gaze
    ‘This will be a popular picture’: Giovanni Battista Moroni’s Tailor and the Female Gaze Lene Østermark-Johansen In October 1862, when Charles Eastlake had secured the purchase of Giovanni Battista Moroni’s The Tailor (c. 1570) for the National Gallery (Fig. 1), he noted with satisfaction: Portrait of a tailor in a white doublet with minute slashes — dark reddish nether dress — a leather belt [strap & buckle] round the end of the white dress. He stands before a table with scissors in his rt hand, & a piece of [black] cloth in the left. Fig. 1: Giovanni Battista Moroni, The Tailor, c. 1570, oil on canvas, 99.5 × 77 cm, National Gallery, London. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. 2 The hands excellent — the head low in tone but good (one or two spotty lights only too much cleaned) the ear carefully & well painted — All in good state — The lowness of the tone in the face the only objection — Background varied in darkness — light enough to relieve dark side of face & d. air — darker in left side & below — quite el.1 Eastlake’s description, focusing on the effects of colour, light, and the state of preservation, does not give away much about the charismatic qualities of the painting. With his final remark, ‘quite eligible’, he recognizes one of the most engaging of the old master portraits as suitable for purchase by the National Gallery. Eastlake’s wife Elizabeth immediately perceived the powerful presence of the tailor and made the following entry in her journal: ‘It is a celebrated picture, called the “Taglia Panni.”2 The tailor, a bright-looking man with a ruff, has his shears in his beautifully painted hands, and is looking at the spectator.
    [Show full text]
  • Death, Dots & Dollars
    Department ART Death, Dots & Dollars The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living by JASON EDWARD KAUFMAN Have you heard the one about the artist who put a 13-foot tiger shark in a glass tank of formaldehyde? Of course you have, and you know it’s no joke. That pickled man-eater is one of the most recognized icons of contemporary culture, and the Damien Hirst turned himself into a pop culture man who created it more than two decades ago, British enfant terrible Damien Hirst, has become a bold-faced name and possibly the best-known artist alive. phenomenon, and along the way became the At 48, he may also be the richest. Three years ago, The Sunday Times pegged his assets at £235 million ($342 million), probably an underestimate for an artist world’s richest artist. who sells works for six figures apiece—some have approached $20 million—and whose production teams crank them out in quantity. w Photo: Ben Stansall/Getty Images 214 Winter 2012 Winter 2012 215 Some critics say he’s the new Warhol, but others label him a shock jock more interested in making headlines and money than meaningful art. The Evening Standard’s Brian Sewell gutted the shark, declaring it “no more interesting than a stuffed pike over a pub door,” and Time magazine’s Robert Hughes dubbed it “the world’s most over-rated marine organism.” But how’s this for return on investment? British advertising mogul Charles Saatchi paid £50,000 (approximately $80,000) for the shark in 1992 and in 2004 sold it to Connecticut hedge funder Steven Cohen for $12 million.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIAN SEWELL, LESLIE WADDINGTON and ART of the NINETIES: the COLLECTORS THAT DEFINED LONDON's ART WORLD from the 1950S TO
    PRESS RELEASE | LONDON FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE : 2 6 SEPTEMBER 2 0 1 6 BRIAN SEWELL, LESLIE WADDINGTON AND ART OF THE NINETIES : THE COLLECTORS THAT DEFINED LONDON’S ART WORLD FROM THE 1950s TO PRESENT DAY Top Row (L to R): Matthias Stomer, Brian Sewell and John Craxton, Middle Row (L to R): Leslie Waddington, Jean Dubuffet and Francis Picabia, Bottom Row (L to R): Douglas Gordon, Damien Hirst and Glenn Brown London – This autumn Christie’s will offer works from three private collections that trace the development and trajectory of the London art scene from the 1950s to present day. This begins with the collection of Brian Sewell, the Evening Standard’s late art critic, who was a Specialist in the Old Master Department at Christie’s in the 1950s and 60s, having graduated in Art History at the Courtauld Institute, and nurtured a keen appetite for Renaissance works that span the 1500s through to Modern British artists of the mid-20th century. He built up a distinctive collection and 248 lots will be offered on 27 September including paintings by the Flemish artist Matthias Stomer, works on paper by the likes of Daniele da Volterra and Joseph Anton Koch, and the British Modernism of Duncan Grant and Eliot Hodgkin. One of the most influential collectors that developed London’s tastes was Leslie Waddington, who arrived in the city in 1957 and went on to become one of the most prominent fine art dealers in modern times, introducing the art world to artists from Jean Dubuffet to Patrick Caulfield, bringing the British and European aesthetic to America for the first time, and American Abstract Expressionism to London.
    [Show full text]
  • Emmanuel Cooper Archive
    Emmanuel Cooper Archive (COOPER) ©Bishopsgate Institute Catalogued by Stefan Dickers, September 2019 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents p.2 Collection Level Description p.3 COOPER/1: Gay Art Archive p.5 COOPER/2: Art Projects p.88 COOPER/3: Gay Left Archive p.93 COOPER/4: Campaign for Homosexual Equality Papers p.108 COOPER/5: Scrapbooks p.126 COOPER/6: Gay Theatre Archive p.127 COOPER/7: Gay History Group p.131 COOPER/8: Portobello Boys p.132 2 COOPER Emmanuel Cooper Archive 1956-209 Name of Creator: Cooper, Emmanuel (1938-2012) potter and writer on the arts Extent: 28 Boxes and oversize items Administrative/Biographical History: Emmanuel Cooper was born in Pilsley, North East Derbyshire and studied at the University for the Creative Arts. He also achieved a PhD degree at Middlesex University. He was a member of the Crafts Council and the editor of Ceramic Review. Since 1999, he was visiting Professor of Ceramics and Glass at the Royal College of Art. He was the author of many books on ceramics, including his definitive biography of Bernard Leach that was published in 2003 (Yale University Press), and was also the editor of The Ceramics Book, published in 2006. In the early 1970s, he was also a cofounder of the Gay Left collective, and remained a prominent LGBT rights campaigner throughout his life. He also published several studies of LGBT art, including The Sexual Perspective and Fully Exposed: The Male Nude in Photography. As a potter, Cooper's work falls into one of two general forms. In the first his vessels are heavily glazed in a volcanic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Year 2010–2011
    TH E April – March NATIONAL GALLEY TH E NATIONAL GALLEY April – March Contents Introduction 5 Director’s Foreword 6 Acquisition 8 Loans 10 Conservation 16 Framing 20 Exhibitions and Display 26 Education 42 Scientifi c Research 46 Research and Publications 50 Private Support of the Gallery 54 Financial Information 58 National Gallery Company Ltd 60 Trustees and Committees of the National Gallery Board 62 Figurative Architectural Decoration inside and outside the National Gallery 63 For a full list of loans, staff publications and external commitments between April 2010 and March 2011, see www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/organisation/ annual-review – The Trustees and Director of the National Gallery da Vinci), increased corporate membership and have spent much of the year just past in making sponsorship, income from donations or otherwise. plans to enable us to deal with the implications of The Government has made it clear that it cuts to our income Grant in Aid, the government wishes to encourage cultural institutions such as funding on which we, to a large extent, depend the National Gallery to place greater reliance on to provide our services to the public. private philanthropic support, and has this year At an early stage in the fi nancial year our income taken some fi rst steps to encourage such support, Grant in Aid was cut by %; and in the autumn we through relatively modest fi scal changes and other were told that we would, in the period to March initiatives. We hope that further incentives to , be faced with further cumulative cuts to our giving will follow, and we continue to ask for the income amounting to % in real terms.
    [Show full text]