Conceptualism – Intersectional Readings, Inter National Framings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grief and Grievance: Art and Mourning in America,” an Intergenerational Exhibition of Works from Thirty-Seven Artists, Conceived by Curator Okwui Enwezor
NEW MUSEUM PRESENTS “GRIEF AND GRIEVANCE: ART AND MOURNING IN AMERICA,” AN INTERGENERATIONAL EXHIBITION OF WORKS FROM THIRTY-SEVEN ARTISTS, CONCEIVED BY CURATOR OKWUI ENWEZOR Exhibition Brings Together Works that Address Black Grief as a National Emergency in the Face of a Politically Orchestrated White Grievance New York, NY...The New Museum is proud to present “Grief and Grievance: Art and Mourning in America,” an exhibition originally conceived by Okwui Enwezor (1963-2019) for the New Museum, and presented with curatorial support from advisors Naomi Beckwith, Massimiliano Gioni, Glenn Ligon, and Mark Nash. On view from February 17 to June 6, 2021, “Grief and Grievance” is an intergenerational exhibition bringing together thirty-seven artists working in a variety of mediums who have addressed the concept of mourning, commemoration, and loss as a direct response to the national emergency of racist violence experienced by Black communities across America. The exhibition further considers the intertwined phenomena of Black grief and a politically orchestrated white grievance, as each structures and defines contemporary American social and political life. Included in “Grief and Grievance” are works encompassing video, painting, sculpture, installation, photography, sound, and performance made in the last decade, along with several key historical works and a series of new commissions created in response to the concept of the exhibition. The artists on view will include: Terry Adkins, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Kevin Beasley, Dawoud Bey, Mark -
In Conversation with Adam Pendleton: What Is Black Dada?
In conversation with Adam Pendleton: What is Black Dada? Awa Konaté James Baldwin once said, ‘we used to think of history as the realm of the settled as an inalterable past, as a nightmare. That was the legacy bequeathed us by the past century’s catastrophes. But while we can never redeem what has been lost, versions of the past are forever being reconstructed in our fabrication of the present.’1 Although Baldwin enumerated these words in 1972, today’s volatile political moments and relations reminds us that the past is repeatedly embedded, and evermore so, in our present sphere. Baldwin comments on the interrelations between past and present realities as a continuum of cultural and historical notions that constitute the very materiality of our social fabric as ever persistent, suggesting the past is never past but an ongoing rupture in the present. Adam Pendleton is an artist whose unwinnable and complex layered practice is exceptionally occupied with Baldwin’s declarative statement. With a career spanning nearly two decades, Pendleton has situated the intersections of race, belonging, cultural politics and art history as varying constructions that are rearticulated and imposed in the very centre of our ‘Contemporary’ – not merely in order to inquire ‘how’ and ‘what if’ but to push the very logic that constitutes their historical and social functions. My first encounter with Adam Pendleton was his large ‘Black Lives’ banner at the Venice Biennale’s Belgian pavilion in 2015.2 The context was stupendous, the banner’s dominating and large scaled presence appeared to almost ‘devour’ the white cubed pavilion by forcing the centrality of its race relations. -
Who Owns the Art World? an Online Panel Discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This Short Panel
A DACS panel discussion, 14 March 2018 Who Owns the Art World? An online panel discussion with Hayley Newman, Morgan Quaintance and Richard Parry. This short panel debate took place during DACS’ Annual Strategy Day, as we thought about the context in which artists are currently working and how best DACS could best support artists and artists’ estates in the future. The Panel Mark Waugh (Chair) is the Business Development Director at DACS. Hayley Newman, Artist and Reader of Fine Art, Slade School of Fine Art, UCL. Morgan Quaintance, writer, musician, broadcaster and curator. Richard Parry, Artist. Mark Waugh (MW): Welcome, and we’re live again at DACS, this time from RIBA, and we’re live with a specific question, it’s quite a simple question – “Who Owns the Art World?” And to answer that, what we’re going to have three presentations, one from Richard Parry, one from Hayley Newman and one from Morgan Quaintance. They come from very particular positions and I think you’ll be able to understand what those positions are after the presentations. Essentially, all three of them share a discourtesy of concern with that question of ownership - and not only the ownership of the art world in a conceptual and a material sense - but also in what the role and agency of the artist is, and indeed, art is, in that context. And we’re asking that in the context of DACS as an organisation which has a 30-year history of thinking about what artists can do to empower themselves and support each other. -
Avantgarden Und Politik
Im Rausch der Revolution: Kunst und Politik bei André Masson und den surrealistischen Gruppierungen Contre-Attaque und Acéphale STEPHAN MOEBIUS Wirft man einen Blick auf die Debatten um die historische Avantgarde- bewegung des Surrealismus, so fällt auf, dass deren politisches Engage- ment1 in der Avantgardeforschung, in Ausstellungen und in der Kunst- geschichte allgemein auf spezifische und mehrere Weisen »gezähmt«2 wird: Entweder werden die politischen Aktivitäten der Surrealisten auf eine antibürgerliche Haltung reduziert oder sie werden als eine kurzzei- tige, von der »wahren« ästhetischen Praxis und den Kunstwerken der Surrealisten völlig abtrennbare Verirrung3 dargestellt. In manchen Inter- pretationen wirft man ihnen sogar vor, mit totalitären Systemen ver- wandt zu sein oder diese vorbereitet zu haben (Dröge/Müller 1995; Klinger 2004: 218). Im letzteren Fall gilt der (meist vor dem Hinter- grund der Totalitarismustheorie argumentierende) pauschale Vorwurf 1 Siehe dazu beispielsweise die Tractes surréalistes et déclarations collecti- ves 1922-1939 (Pierre 1980), Nadeau (1986), Short (1969) sowie Lewis (1988) und Spiteri/LaCoss (2003). 2 Vgl. Breuer (1997). Auch die Düsseldorfer Ausstellung (Spies 2002) über den Surrealismus machte eine Trennung zwischen Bildern und Manifes- ten, sie zähmte den Surrealismus und setzte die Bilder kaum in Beziehung zu den politischen Manifesten, Zeitschriften und Texten (vgl. Bürger 2002). 3 Vgl. Vailland (1948), Greenberg (1986), Alfred Barr (1936), William Ru- bin (1968). 89 STEPHAN MOEBIUS einer Geistesverwandtschaft mit dem Faschismus oder dem Stalinismus den gesamten historischen Avantgardebewegungen, ohne dass in den meisten Fällen im Einzelnen zwischen den unterschiedlichen Protago- nisten bzw. zwischen Surrealismus, Dadaismus, Bauhaus und dem fa- schistischen Futurismus unterschieden wird. Die Futuristen sind in der Tat kriegslüsterne Patrioten und spätere Parteigänger des italienischen Faschismus. -
The Phillips Collection Exhibition History, 1999–2021
Exhibition History, 1999–2021 Exhibition History, 1999–2021 THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION EXHIBITION HISTORY, 1999–2021 The Phillips Collection presented the following exhibitions for which it served as either an organizer or a presenting venue. * Indicates a corresponding catalogue 23, 2000. Organizing institution: The TPC.2000.6* 12, 2002. Organizing institution: 1999 Phillips Collection. William Scharf: Paintings, 1984–2000. Smith College Museum of Art, November 18, 2000–July 2, 2001. Northampton, MA. TPC.1999.1 Organizing institution: The Phillips Photographs from the Collection of 2000 Collection. Traveled to The Frederick TPC.2002.2 Dr. and Mrs. Joseph D. Lichtenberg. R. Weisman Museum of Art, Malibu, John Walker. February 16–August 4, January 12–April 25, 1999. Organizing TPC.2000.1* CA, October 20–December 15, 2001. 2002. Organizing institution: The institution: The Phillips Collection. Honoré Daumier. February 19–May Phillips Collection. 14, 2000. Organizing institutions: TPC.1999.2 The Phillips Collection, The National 2001 TPC.2002.3 An Adventurous Spirit: Calder at The Gallery of Canada, and Réunion des Howard Hodgkin. May 18–July 18, 2002. Phillips Collection. January 23–June Musées Nationaux, Paris. Traveled to 2 TPC.2001.1* Organizing institution: The Phillips 8, 1999. Organizing institutions: The additional venues. Wayne Thiebaud: A Paintings Collection. Phillips Collection and The Calder Retrospective. February 10–April 29, TPC.2000.2* Foundation. 2001. Organizing institution: Fine TPC.2002.4* An Irish Vision: Works by Tony O’Malley. Arts Museums of San Francisco, CA. Edward Weston: Photography and TPC.1999.3 April 8–July 9, 2000. Organizing Traveled to 3 additional venues. Modernism. June 1–August 18, 2002. -
The Self-Organization of Contemporary Art in China, 2001–2012
Bao Dong Rethinking Practices within the Art System: The Self-Organization of Contemporary Art in China, 2001–2012 The Origin of the Term “Self-Organization” in China The term “self-organization” was first used in the context of contemporary Chinese art in 2005 at the Second Guangzhou Triennial curated by Hou Hanru, Hans Ulrich Obrist, and Guo Xiaoyan. Self-organization was one of the special projects of the triennial, and there were two panel discussions on the topic. The exhibition theme “Beyond” focused on the topic of alternative modernity in China and non-Western countries, and the term self-organization was defined by the following statements: “A number of independent art organizations, institutions, and communities have taken an active role in artistic creation and practice” and “their projects are often diverse, flexible” and “self-induced in nature.”1 Altogether, twenty-four self- organized groups2 were included in this project, and for the curators, the concept of “self-organization” was used to differentiate independent and autonomous organizations from those attached to government systems or political parties. This feature is also the fundamental difference between the various artist-run autonomous organizations and the organizations within the conventional art system as constituted by Chinese Artists Association, along with the various academies of painting, art institutes, museums, and so on. In other words, self-organization is considered a force operating outside of the conventional art system, just as the inception, growth, and flourishing of contemporary Chinese art is believed to have been achieved outside of official systems. In terms of any independence from the conventional art system, self- organization is not a new phenomenon in the contemporary Chinese art scene. -
BEYOND WORDS Incorporating Collage, Cultural Criticism, Poetry and Video, Adam Pendleton’S Work Defies Categorization
the exchange aRt TALK BEYOND WORDS Incorporating collage, cultural criticism, poetry and video, Adam Pendleton’s work defies categorization. That’s only part of what makes it so appealing to collectors and museums alike. BY TED LOOS PHOTOGRAPHY BY CARLOS CHAVARRÍA HEN AN ARTIST captures a cultural he writes. Pendleton doesn’t think he invented the Being gay and black gave him a useful outsider’s moment just so, it’s like a lightning conversation that he’s a part of. “It is a continuum,” he perspective. “When you’re sort of off to the side, you bolt—there’s a crackle in the air, a blind- says, “but it doesn’t only move forward; it moves back- supply yourself with something that long term is ing flash, and the clouds part. At just 34, wards and sideways, too.” ultimately more productive,” he says. (Pendleton is WBrooklyn-based artist Adam Pendleton has proved Though he works in many media, much of his now married to a food entrepreneur, and they live in himself capable of generating such phenomena. visual work starts as collage, and he has a canny eye Brooklyn’s Fort Greene.) Over the past decade, Pendleton’s conceptual take for juxtapositions that recalls one of his idols, Jasper In 2002, he completed a two-year independent art- on race in America has drawn attention and stirred Johns. “Already in his incredibly youthful career, he ist’s study program in Pietrasanta, Italy, but he doesn’t discussion across the country. Last year, he had solo has managed to land on a graphic language that is have a bachelor’s degree or an M.F.A. -
My Article in the Last Issue of Finch's Quarterly About the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition Achieved a Very Modest Degree
Hungary for Culture Charles Saumarez Smith takes issue with the line of Brian (Sewell) and looks forward to the Royal Academy’s Treasures from Budapest exhibition My article in the last issue of Finch’s Quarterly about the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition achieved a modest degree of fame by being quoted in Brian Sewell’s review of this year’s exhibition in the Evening Standard: As its chief executive put it in the current edition of a journal of which he is arts editor, the Academy holds “the 18th-century view that the best judges of art are not the critics but the public. Critics may sneer, but the public continues to enjoy the Summer Exhibition precisely because it gives them an opportunity to make up their own minds about what to like.” Sewell went on to say: The public can make up its mind about fish and chips and jellied eels, but to put it in charge of the kitchens of The Ritz would not be wise. And I am less sure that Charles Saumarez Smith’s contempt for critics was widely held anywhere in Europe in the 18th century, the Age of Reason, when the Enlightenment held sway; and even if it were, then the public to which he refers was not the ancestor of some bloke on the Clapham bendy-bus, but an educated gentleman with the benefits of private tutoring, Eton, Oxbridge and the Grand Tour, as ready with a Greek or Latin tag as our beloved Boris Johnson. The chief executive will find little of that background among the old biddies from Berkshire up for the day. -
Dutch Townscape at Toronto / the Dutch Cityscape in the 17Th Century and Its Sources. an Exhibition Held at the Amsterdams Histo
Document generated on 09/24/2021 5:26 p.m. RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne Canadian Art Review --> See the erratum for this article Dutch Townscape at Toronto The Dutch Cityscape in the 17th Century and its Sources. An exhibition held at the Amsterdams Historisch Museum, Amsterdam, 17 June–28 August 1977, and the Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto, 27 September–13 November 1977 Leonard J. Slatkes Volume 5, Number 1, 1978 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1077321ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1077321ar See table of contents Publisher(s) UAAC-AAUC (University Art Association of Canada | Association d'art des universités du Canada) ISSN 0315-9906 (print) 1918-4778 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Slatkes, L. J. (1978). Review of [Dutch Townscape at Toronto / The Dutch Cityscape in the 17th Century and its Sources. An exhibition held at the Amsterdams Historisch Museum, Amsterdam, 17 June–28 August 1977, and the Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto, 27 September–13 November 1977]. RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 5(1), 54–56. https://doi.org/10.7202/1077321ar Tous droits réservés © UAAC-AAUC (University Art Association of Canada | This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Association d'art des universités du Canada), 1978 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. -
Please Scroll Down for Article
This article was downloaded by: [Sternberger, Paul] On: 26 February 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 909051291] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Photographies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t778749997 ME, MYSELF AND INDIA Paul Sternberger Online Publication Date: 01 March 2009 To cite this Article Sternberger, Paul(2009)'ME, MYSELF AND INDIA',Photographies,2:1,37 — 58 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/17540760802696971 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17540760802696971 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Paul Sternberger ME, MYSELF AND INDIA Contemporary Indian photography and the diasporic experience Recent Indian photographers have used their medium to reveal, interpret, and influence the multifaceted nature of Indian identity and cross-cultural experiences in India and abroad. -
Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979
Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Dennis, M. Submitted version deposited in Coventry University’s Institutional Repository Original citation: Dennis, M. () Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979. Unpublished MSC by Research Thesis. Coventry: Coventry University Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Some materials have been removed from this thesis due to Third Party Copyright. Pages where material has been removed are clearly marked in the electronic version. The unabridged version of the thesis can be viewed at the Lanchester Library, Coventry University. Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Mark Dennis A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the University’s requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy/Master of Research September 2016 Library Declaration and Deposit Agreement Title: Forename: Family Name: Mark Dennis Student ID: Faculty: Award: 4744519 Arts & Humanities PhD Thesis Title: Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Freedom of Information: Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) ensures access to any information held by Coventry University, including theses, unless an exception or exceptional circumstances apply. In the interest of scholarship, theses of the University are normally made freely available online in the Institutions Repository, immediately on deposit. -
Toezichtsrapport VRT - 2020
Inhoud Inleiding 1 Strategische doelstelling 1: Voor iedereen relevant 3 1.1. Voor alle doelgroepen 3 1.2. Aandacht voor diversiteit in beeldvorming 5 1.3. Aandacht voor diversiteit in toegankelijkheid 6 1.4. Aandacht voor diversiteit in personeelsbeleid 8 Strategische doelstelling 2: informatie, cultuur en educatie prioriteit 10 SD 2.1. Informatie | De VRT is de garantie op onpartijdige, onafhankelijke en betrouwbare informatie 10 en duiding SD 2.2. Cultuur | De VRT moedigt cultuurparticipatie aan, heeft aandacht voor de diverse culturele 19 uitingen in de Vlaamse samenleving en biedt een venster op de wereld 2.2.1. Cultuur voor alle Vlamingen 19 2.2.2. Aandacht voor diverse creatieve uitingen op een verbredende en verdiepende manier 20 2.2.3. Blijvende investeringen in lokale content 21 2.2.4. Cultuurparticipatie bevorderen 22 2.2.5. Een divers muziekbeleid dat kansen geeft aan jong, Vlaams talent 24 SD 2.3. Educatie | De VRT zal de Vlaamse mediagebruikers iets leren, hen inspireren en het actieve 27 burgerschap stimuleren 2.3.1. De VRT heeft een breed-educatieve rol 27 2.3.2. De VRT draagt bij tot de mediawijsheid van de Vlaamse mediagebruikers 29 2.3.3. De VRT zet meer in op documentaire 31 Strategische doelstelling 3: Publieke meerwaarde voor ontspanning en sport 33 SD 3.1. Ontspanning | Vlaams, verbindend en kwaliteitsvol 33 SD 3.2. Sport | Verbindend, universeel toegankelijk en participatie-bevorderend 34 Strategische doelstelling 4: Een aangescherpte merkenstrategie met VRT als kwaliteitslabel 37 4.1. Een duidelijk opgebouwde en dynamische merkenportfolio 37 4.2. Aangescherpte aanbodsmerken met focus op publieke meerwaarde 37 4.3.