Amurian Zoological Journal IV(1), 2012. 32-49 Published: 30.03
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and Systematics of the Eurasian
DE TTK 1949 Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Az eurázsiai Craniophora Snellen, 1867 fajok taxonómiája és szisztematikája (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) PhD thesis Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés Kiss Ádám Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2017. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Kiss Ádám Tanúsítom, hogy Kiss Ádám doktorjelölt 2011 – 2014. között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2017. ………………………… Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori értekezés betétlapja Taxonomy and systematics of the Eurasian Craniophora Snellen, 1867 species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológiai tudományágban Írta: Kiss Ádám okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Prof. Dr. Dévai György tagok: Prof. Dr. Bakonyi Gábor Dr. Rácz István András -
Conservation Actions
CHAPTER 4 Conservation Actions Table of Contents Take Action! Get Involved! ................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Background and Rationale ................................................................................................................. 9 Conservation Action Classification System .................................................................................... 11 Conservation Action Description ........................................................................................................ 12 Best Practices for Conservation Actions ............................................................................................. 15 International Conservation Actions ................................................................................................ 15 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Regional Conservation Actions ........................................................................................................ 19 Regional Conservation Needs Program .............................................................................................. 19 Regional Action ............................................................................................................................. -
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes. -
Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data. -
Impacts and Options for Biodiversity-Oriented Land Managers
GYPSY MOTH (LYMANTRIA DISPAR): IMPACTS AND OPTIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY-ORIENTED LAND MANAGERS May 2004 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Citation: Schweitzer, Dale F. 2004. Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar): Impacts and Options for Biodiversity- Oriented Land Managers. 59 pages. NatureServe: Arlington, Virginia. © 2004 NatureServe NatureServe 1101 Wilson Blvd., 15th Floor Arlington, VA 22209 www.natureserve.org Author’s Contact Information: Dr. Dale Schweitzer Terrestrial Invertebrate Zoologist NatureServe 1761 Main Street Port Norris, NJ 08349 856-785-2470 Email: [email protected] NatureServe Gypsy Moth: Impacts and Options for Biodiversity-Oriented Land Managers 2 Acknowledgments Richard Reardon (United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV), Kevin Thorpe (Agricultural Research Service, Insect Chemical Ecology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD) and William Carothers (Forest Service Forest Protection, Asheville, NC) for technical review. Sandra Fosbroke (Forest Service Information Management Group, Morgantown, WV) provided many helpful editorial comments. The author also wishes to commend the Forest Service for funding so much important research and technology development into the impacts of gypsy moth and its control on non-target organisms and for encouraging development of more benign control technologies like Gypchek. Many, but by no means all, Forest Service-funded studies are cited in this document, including Peacock et al. (1998), Wagner et al. (1996), and many of the studies cited from Linda Butler and Ann Hajek. Many other studies in the late 1980s and 1990s had USDA Forest Service funding from the Appalachian Gypsy Moth Integrated Pest Management Project (AIPM). -
North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek CFA Action Plan
Action Plan for the North Fork Mountain & Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area West Virginia Division of Natural Resources January 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the State Wildlife Action Plan & Conservation Focus Areas .................................................... 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need, Habitats and Stresses ................................................................... 2 Conservation Actions .................................................................................................................................... 2 Conservation Focus Areas and Action Plans ................................................................................................. 3 Climate Change and Resilience ..................................................................................................................... 4 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................................... 5 Organization of this Action Plan .................................................................................................................... 6 How to use this plan ..................................................................................................................................... 7 North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area .................................................................. -
Moth Moniioring Scheme
MOTH MONIIORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre 1/1/1/ National Boord of Waters and the Environment Nordic Council of Ministers /////// Helsinki 1 994 Environmental Report 8 MOTH MONITORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre National Board of Waters and the Environment Helsinki 1994 Published by Environment Data Centre (EDC) National Board of Waters and the Environment P.O.BOX 250 FIN—001 01 Helsinki FINLAND Tel. +358—0—73 14 4211 Fax. +358—0—7314 4280 Internet address: [email protected] Edited by Guy Söderman, EDC Technical editng by Päivi Tahvanainen, EDC This handbook has been circulated for comments to the members of the project group for moth monitoring in the Nordic countries under the auspices of the Monitoring and Data Group of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Cover photo © Tarla Söderman Checking of installation of light trap at Vilsandi National Park in Estonia. Printed by Painotalo MIKTOR Ky, Helsinki 1 994 ISBN 951—47—9982—8 ISSN 0788—3765 CONTENTS .4 INTRODUCTION 5 PART 1: OBJECTIVES 7 1 Short term objectives 7 2 Medium-long term objectives 8 3 Additional objectives 8 4 Specific goals 9 5 Network design 9 5.1 Geographical coverage 9 5.2 Biotopes coverage 10 PART II: METRODOLOGY 11 1 Technical equipments and use 11 1.1 Structure of Iight traps 11 1.2 Field installation 13 1.3 Structure ofbait trap 14 1.4 Documentation of sites 15 1.5 Timing the light traps 15 1.6 Sampling procedures 15 2 Sample handling 16 2.1 Prestoring 16 2.2 Posting 16 -
A Land Managers Guide to Prairies and Savannas in Michigan: History, Classification, and Management
A Land Managers Guide to Prairies and Savannas in Michigan: History, Classification, and Management Prepared by: Ryan P. O’Connor Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan DNR Wildlife Division Landowner Incentive Program September 30, 2006 Report Number 2006-18 Suggested citation: O’Connor, R. 2006. A Land Manager’s Guide to Prairies and Savannas in Michigan: History, Classification and Management. Report 2006-18. Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing, MI. Copyright 2006 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photo: Oak barrens in Newaygo County, Susan R. Crispin, MNFI TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Historical Overview of Prairies and Savannas ............................................................................................................ 2 What was Michigan Like? Distribution of Prairies and Savannas circa 1800s ......................................................... 2 Prairie vs. Savanna: Historical Context -
Biodiverse Master
Woodland Habitats WOODLAND HABITATS CONTENTS Woodland introduction . 144 Opportunities for action in the Cairngorms . 145 The main woodland biodiversity issues . 146 Main threats to UK Priority species in the Cairngorms woodlands . 150 UK Priority species and Locally important species accounts . 151 Cairngorms woodland habitat accounts: • Broadleaved woodland . 164 • Birch woodland . 166 • Aspen woodland . 167 • Upland oak woodland . 178 • Upland mixed ash woodland . 179 • Wet/riparian woodland . 180 • Montane scrub . 182 • Planted conifer woodland . 184 • Native pine woodland . 186 ‘Key’ Cairngorms woodland species . 189 143 The Cairngorms Local Biodiversity Action Plan WOODLAND INTRODUCTION: The term woodland can be used to describe all tree cover in the Cairngorms. This is defined to include ‘all groups, stands and blocks of trees >0.25 ha except for suburban trees, and includ- ing scattered trees where there are more than 30 trees at a density of not less than 4 per hectare, excluding trees of less than 2 metres in height’. The woodlands of the Cairngorms can be further classified broadly according to predominant tree species, whether planted or self-sown, and to tree age and woodland site antiquity. The woodlands of the Cairngorms are of national and international importance because they contain the largest remaining areas of semi-natural woodland habitats in Britain. The Cairngorms area occupies just less than 10% of Scotland’s land mass, yet contains 25% of the entire Scottish resource of native woodlands and its Caledonian pine woodlands are greater in total area and individual size than anywhere else in Scotland. The extent of native woodland is important for many specialist species of plant, animal and fungus that depend upon this habitat. -
Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Patocka, J.; Turcáni, M. Contribution to the Description of Pupae of the Western Palaearctic Noctuidae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 141, marzo, 2008, pp. 117-124 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45514114 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Nº 141 16/3/08 17:21 Página 117 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (141), marzo 2008: 117-124 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Contribution to the Description of Pupae of the Western Palaearctic Noctuidae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) J. Patogka & M. Turgáni Abstract The descriptions of pupae of several West Palaearctic species of Noctuidae (subfamilies Plusiinae, Acontiinae, Eublemminae and Bagiarinae) are listed in the paper. The members of four sub-families, four genera, and four species were described and the main morphological characters of pupae were drawn. The main differences were compared related noctuid moth species previously described by the authors with. The systematic status and position of described species in current systems is discussed from the point of view of morphology of their pupae. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, pupae, comparative morphology, taxonomy Contribución a la descripción de la crisálida de los Noctuidae del oeste Paleártico (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resumen En este trabajo se da la descripción de la crisálida de algunos Noctuidae (subfamilias Plusiinae, Acontiinae, Eublemminae y Bagiarinae) del Paleártico occidental. -
Lepidopterans in the Summer Diet of Eptesicus Serotinus in Central Bohemia
Vespertilio 16: 197–201, 2012 ISSN 1213-6123 Lepidopterans in the summer diet of Eptesicus serotinus in Central Bohemia Peter MIKULA1 & Adéla ČMOKOVÁ2 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ–128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Praha 2, Czech Republic; [email protected] Abstract. Dismembered prey samples, especially lepidopterans, were collected using fine nets under- neath feeding perches around the summer roost of Eptesicus serotinus in the Čentice village (Central Bohemia). We evaluated the total number of moths, species composition and dominance of particular species in the diet of E. serotinus during the summer season. In total, fragments of 299 individuals of lepidopterans were collected and identified. The most frequently culled parts collected under the feeding perches were Mamestra brassicae (40.5%), Odonestis pruni (11.7%) and Noctua pronuba (10.4%). The most frequent families were Noctuidae (76.7%) and Nymphalidae (6.7%). The overwhelming majority of preyed lepidopterans were tympana moths of cultivated rural habitats. More than 80% of the consumed moths were important agricultural pests. Foraging, Lepidoptera, serotine bat, Czech Republic Introduction Bats belong to animals with mostly nocturnal activity. In the result to such way of life, bats have developed many behavioural and morphological adaptations. Each species has adapted to the given conditions differently, which is also reflected by different morphology of the flight apparatus and type of echolocation (Schnitzler & Henson 1980, Norberg & Rayner 1987, Schnitzler & Kalko 1988). The given parameters are closely connected with the type of prey and predominant hunting strategy. -
The BELLFEST 12-15 JUNE 2010 a FESTSCHRIFT TRIBUTE to the SCIENTIFIC WORK of ROSS and JOYCE BELL
the BELLFEST 12-15 JUNE 2010 A FESTSCHRIFT TRIBUTE TO THE SCIENTIFIC WORK OF ROSS AND JOYCE BELL Vermont Dawn, Camel’s Hump - Artist: David Lachman’ Joyce and Ross Bell at their home in South Burlington August 1987 WELCOME TO THE BELLFEST On behalf of the Department of Biology at The University of Vermont, it is my distinct honor to welcome you to ‘Bellfest 2010’, a festive symposium celebrating the life and works of Professor Emeritus Ross T. Bell. The program presentations, organized by Professor John Spence, include among renowned coleopterists many of Professor Bell’s former students, associates, and former student’s students. Indeed the Bell phylogeny is deep and highly branched! We are pleased that you have chosen to come to beautiful Burlington for what promises to be a memorable event to honour Ross and Joyce Bell, who have been Vermonters for more than sixty years. Professor Bell has distinguished himself throughout his long and illustrious academic career at the University of Vermont. We are proud that our beloved institution has served as the Bells’ research quarters since 1955, with no signs of abating. Professor Bell’s extraordinary scholarship, careful and dedicated work, and passion for ‘the beetle’ has influenced and inspired many. Together with Joyce, his tireless lifelong companion, Ross has traveled the world in search of elusive and exotic beetles. He has discovered species worldwide, produced taxonomic revisions and field guides, published numerous scientific papers, contributed significantly to our understanding of the natural history of northern New England and made expert contributions to the Tree of Life web project.