Bligh to Castlereagh. 557

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bligh to Castlereagh. 557 BLIGH TO CASTLEREAGH. 557 Offence with which I am charged, and to promote the fullest 1808. and most impartial discription of its merits and demerits before -— the most proper Court. • Sffiu??* 21st March, 1808. WM. GORE. K»IMI Read by Mr. Gore and afterwards delivered to the Acting Deputy Judge Advocate on the 21st of March, 1808, when Six Officers were assembled with him for the purpose of holding a Criminal Court. [Enclosure No. 12.] PROVOST-MARSHAL GORE'S INTENDED DEFENCE. Gentlemen, I am indicted for having committed wilful and corrupt Proposed Perjury, and I am now on my Trial. I shall occupy as little of wmiamGore your time as is consistent with the duty I owe to myself, to my before the . ., \ criminal court. family, to my character, and to public Justice. In the first place, I shall ground my defence on a denial of the Jurisdiction of the Six Members who were convened by His Excellency Governor Bligh's Precept, for the purpose of their constituting a Court of Criminal Jurisdiction; for as they refused to swear His Majesty's Judge-Advocate a Member of such in­ tended Court, they never had existence as a Court, they being defective of their principal Member as prescribed by Law; and in Law it is laid down as an irrevocable Maxim, that when an Act of Parliament designates or marks out the specific number of persons who shall act, preside, or are to adjudicate in any Judicial Proceedings, it shall never consist of less or fewer than such designated number; and the Act of Parliament on which the Patent for establishing Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction in this country is founded, declares in specific terms that such Courts shall consist of Six Officers of His Majesty's Sea and land Forces, and of His Majesty's Judge-Advocate for the time being, it follows, a fortiori, that such Six Members possessed no legal authority to take the Prisoner out of my Custody, and to render him to his former Bail. Should it nevertheless be insisted that they were invested with such Authority, I, however, object to the determination, it being a point on which, if any possible doubt can exist in the minds of dispassionate men, cannot be decided here, and must be referred to His Majesty's Ministers for their instructions respecting it. I contend they were not vested with such Authority, for when the Prisoner appeared with his Bondmen at the Bar of the Court before which he was to be tried, the Bond became null and void, his former Bail were no longer responsible for him, they 558 HISTORICAL RECORDS OF AUSTRALIA. 1808. were free from the Condition and obligation of the Bond, and the 30 June. Prisoner was then in my Custody; and if the Court afterwards, Proposed defence of on application from the Prisoner or his Counsel, was inclined to William Gore indulge him with Bail, it could noj be granted without the con­ before the sent of the Prosecutor or his Counsel; but even in that case the criminal court. new Bail Bond should have been given to me, for I alone was answerable for the Prisoner's appearance when he once came with his Bail into Court; but the Prosecutor or his Counsel were not applied to for their consent—no fresh Bond was exacted from them or given to me. I was not their Officer, they had no legal existence as a Court, and my duty directed me to disclaim their authority. If, however, they were a Court, I have now proved without a chance of being refuted, that they could not re-deliver the Prisoner to his former Bail, as he was then in my Custody, and he or his Bondsmen did not express a desire to enter a new Recog­ nizance to me. I therefore still considered him in my custody, from whence, when he withdrew himself, he was in Law guilty of an Escape, and by Virtue of my Office I was armed with full and sufficient authority to pursue and re-take him; but Governor Bligh, from his uniform disposition that the Law should be literally complied with, desired my authority should be supported by an Escape Warrant, which was granted unto me under the Signatures of four Justices; however, before such Warrant was granted, my Deposition, that the Prisoner, Mr. McArthur, was not then in my custody, or in any other Custody that I knew of, was necessary. I therefore made an Affidavit of its truth—I was then, and I am still justified by the Law—and the Fact, which I shall prove by Evidence, and from the most incontestible Authorities. Even allowing, for Argument's sake, that the Six Members had legal authority to deliver the Prisoner, without a Bond, to his former Bail, I acted legally, because I positively swear that I never knew he was delivered to his former Bail; and as to my assent by a Nod or a Bow, I did not understand that a delivery of the Prisoner to Bail was the purport of Captain Kemp's address to me; but to admit a Nod or a Bow as Evidence in a Court of Justice would, I make no doubt, be deemed a novel, a ridiculous, and too dangerous a precedent for, in Law, to con­ vict a man of perjury. A probable evidence is not enough, but it must be a strong and clear Evidence. A Bow or a Nod has not even the strength of probability; they are at best merely con­ jectural, and are so wholly undefinable as to allow of all persons, according to their various interests and pursuits, to attach what meaning they please to them; but, Gentlemen, it would be an abuse and a waste of your time, and an imposition on your BLIGH TO CASTLEREAGH. 559 understandings, to delay you longer on this Subject. I shall, isos. therefore, only observe that in Law they cannot be admitted as s^"6' proof against me. Proposed r D defence of With respect to Captain Kemp's testimony,* I most solemnly William Gore swear that I never heard him express himself to the effect he has criminal court. sworn, and against his Oath is the direct evidence of Mr. Griffin. And besides, it being physically impossible, by any Evidence, however strong, to prove that I heard the words so sworn to by Captain Kemp, as spoken by him to me, I humbly submit to you, Gentlemen, that I have not sworn a false Oath, nor am I guilty of Wilful and Corrupt Perjury; for, according to Hawkins, 172, though I might be in error I was not, however, guilty of Perjury, wilful or corrupt, because " when a person even swears falsely, if he mistook the true state of the question, it is not Perjury." But, Gentlemen, although I have deliberated to this moment on the Oath I have taken so far back as the 25th of January, I am still firmly persuaded, and convinced that I was not in error, for the Prisoner, Mr. McArthur, was not in my Custody, nor in any custody that I know of at the time I made a deposition to that effect; but he could not be in custody of any other person, with­ out his executing a Legal Bond to me. Lastly, Gentlemen, as in Civil Cases I am answerable to the Party injured, so in Criminal matters to the Crown. Had I, of my own mere descretion, any right or the authority to permit the Prisoner, Mr. McArthur, to be delivered to his former Bail with­ out observing even the formality of a Bond? Would I not have exposed myself to a Prosecution at the Suit of the Crown? And would I not be indebted to the lenity and forbearance of His Excellency Governor Bligh if he did not instantly, on the affair coming to his Knowledge, place me under an Arrest, and call a Court-Martial on me if my Offence were a Military one; or would he not, put the question in any point of view you choose, have suspended me for incapacity, for a shameful neglect of my Duty, and for a breach of his Orders ? This last is a more con­ vincing argument than I have yet used of the folly, of the ab­ surdity, and of the wickedness of the Prosecution that has been instituted against me; it is a certain and positive proof that the design of the Prosecutor has originated in motives dishonourable to himself as a Man, and in every respect repugnant to the prin­ ciples of common Sense and common honesty. Permit me, Gentlemen, to ask you where is the Officer of the Crown who would venture on so hazardous an enterprise as the execution of this duty, if for the performance of it he was threatened with a prosecution, intended ultimately to affect his life, his character, and his honor ? And if every ignorant and discontented caviller * Note 167. 560 HISTORICAL RECORDS OF AUSTRALIA. 1808. and ruler against the Government was not only secretly en­ 30 June. couraged but openly supported in instituting such vexatious, Proposed defence of harrassing, and unfounded prosecutions ? William Gore Let me again, Gentlemen, call your attention to the last argu­ before the ment I have adduced, and ask you, Had I pleaded ignorance to criminal court. Governor Bligh that such a Bond was necessary to be executed to me, would not His Majesty's Ministers, on the matter being reported to them, approve of my suspension and deservedly deprive me of my Appointment for incapacity; and if from motives of Interest or Favor I had consented to the Prisoner's returning to his former Bail, would I not meritedly, in the eyes of His Majesty's Ministers, and of all faithful and honest Ser­ vants of the Crown, incur the base censure of a venal Officer, too corrupt to hold an honorable Commission? [Enclosure No.
Recommended publications
  • Ocean Hauling EIA Report (2001)
    OCEAN HAULING EIA REPORT Prepared for: NSW Fisheries October 2001 Prepared by: SMEC Australia Pty Ltd ACN 065 475 149 Project Number: 31229.001 PREPARATION, REVIEW AND AUTHORISATION Project Name: Ocean Hauling EIA Report Project No.: 31229.001 Prepared by: Ros Taplin Signature: Position: Senior Consultant Date: 16th October 2001 Reviewed by: Michael Wiener Signature: Position Environmental Scientist Date: 16th October 2001 This report was prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract between SMEC Australia Pty Ltd (SMEC) and the Client. To the best of SMEC’s knowledge the proposal presented herein reflects the Client’s intentions when the report was printed. In preparing this report, SMEC relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations referenced herein. Except as otherwise stated in this report, SMEC has not undertaken further verification regarding the accuracy or completeness of these information sources. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1-2 1.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................1-2 1.2 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................1-2 1.3 CONSULTATION .............................................................................1-3 2 OCEAN HAULING FISHERY.................................................... 2-1 2.1 FISHERY WATERS..........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Work of William Redfern
    THE LIFE AND WORK OF WILLIAM REDFERN The Annual Post-Graduate Oration, delivered on April 29, 1953, in the Great Hall of the University of Sydney. This oration is delivered to commemorate those who have advanced the art and science of medicine in New South Wales. By EDWARD FORD, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine and Professor of Preventive Medicine in the University of Sydney. THE LIFE AND WORK OF WILLIAM REDFERN THE LIFE AND WORK OF WILLIAM REDFERN By EDWARD FORD, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine and Professor of Preventive Medicine, University of Sydney. WILLIAM REDFERN, one of our most distinguished Australian medical forebears, arrived on these shores, in trial and despair, over a century and a half ago. He came as a convict who suffered in turn the horror of a sentence of death, the misery of life imprisonment and exile, and a bitter residue of disdain and persecution. Yet William Redfern rose from the depths to an honoured place in our history. He was a pioneer of Australian medicine, agriculture and husbandry, and a citizen who contributed greatly to the welfare of the early colony. He was the first medical practitioner to receive an Australian qualification, and our first teacher of medical students. It is an honour to recall, in this Sixth Post-Graduate Oration, the work of William Redfern and the debt we owe to him. This is made possible by the records of his day, stored richly in the Mitchell Library, and by the biographical work of the late Dr. Norman Dunlop (1928a, b) and other historians.
    [Show full text]
  • King to Camden. 681
    KING TO CAMDEN. 681 [Enclosure E.] lg06 RETURN of Live Stock, March 8th-15th 1806. is March. [A copy of this return is not available.] HveUstock for use as STATEMENT of the time the Cattle belonging to the Crown in Provisions- New South Wales will last at whole and half Rations for the Numbers Victualled from the Stores, Say 2,000 full Rations at 7 lbs. of Fresh Meat a week each full Ration. 3 014 Cattle 300 lbs At full { ' ® - each ") 68 Weekg \ 1,410 Sheep @ 30 „ „ j b» weeks. At half j 3.0W Cattle @ 300 lbs. each ( 186 Weeks \ 1,410 Sheep @ 30 „ „ ) The whole Number of Cattle, Young and old being taken, they are averaged at 300 lbs. each; But the grown Cattle well fattened will weigh from 6 to 800 Weight. For the Cattle and other Stock belonging to Individuals, a Reference may be made to the last General Muster in August, 1805. [Enclosure F.] MR. JOHN MACARTHUR TO GOVERNOR KING. Sir, Parramatta, 2nd March, 1806. When I received my Grants of Land at the Cow Pastures, Macarthur's consequent on the Right Hon'ble Earl Camden's directions, Tour gJ'g^Hd cattle Excellency was pleased to signify, if a Proposal were to be made for reclaiming the numerous Herds of Wild Cattle on Terms equitable and of evident Advantage to Government, such a Pro­ posal might receive Your Approbation, and induce You to enter into a Contract for the Accomplishment of that Object. Having since very attentively reflected on the Practicability of such an Undertaking, I now do myself the honor to lay before You the enclosed Proposal, And I trust it will appear to Your Excellency both moderate and equitable, Altho' doubtless it will admit of, and perhaps require, some Modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • CONVICTS TRANSPORTED to PORT MACQUARIE
    New South Wales CONVICTS TRANSPORTED to PORT MACQUARIE UNDER COLONIAL SENTENCE 14th SEPTEMBER 1825 - 20th APRIL 1829 VOLUME 1 A-L First published 2014 © National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Convicts Transported To Port Macquarie Under Colonial Sentence 14TH September 1825 – 20TH April 1829 ISBN: Dewey Number: Includes Index: Volume 1 A-L Volume 2 M-Z PREFACE This Local Studies project was undertaken to provide and record information regarding convicts being transported to Port Macquarie Penal Settlement a second place of punishment within the time frame of September 1825 to April 1829, listing their name, ship of arrival to Port Jackson Sydney, Indent information and the ship of transportation to Port Macquarie. For anybody requiring further information on any convict there are more records available for research in the Port Macquarie-Hastings Library and at the State Records of New South Wales at Kingswood. Convicts transported to Port Macquarie within these dates are listed under the heading of 'Colonial Sentence' so that the reader may distinguish between any other date of transportation to Port Macquarie, as many convicts were sent to and from the Settlement. All care and accuracy has been taken whilst transcribing from available documentation at the time of publication, and are transcribed as per original. "Written as" refers to records that differ in spelling etc. Permission Researched by members of Port Macquarie-Hastings Library Grant Street Port Macquarie NSW 2444 Jan Shelley Pam Yates Cheryl Perry Anne Keena Matters of Interest Females Transported within this project Jane Bailey per Indispensable 1809 Anne Lang per Mariner 1825 Mary Lowry per Elizabeth 1818 Catherine Maddingan now Fox per Lord Wellington 1820 Eliza Pigott per Mariner 1825 Money Value Old Bailey Proceedings Online value of monies written as 3 l.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Storms on the East Coast of Australia 1770–2008
    SEVERE STORMS ON THE EAST COAST OF AUSTRALIA 1770 – 2008 Jeff Callaghan Research Fellow, Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld Formerly Head Severe Storm Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane Dr Peter Helman Senior Research Fellow, Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld Published by Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 10 November 2008 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. ISBN: 978-1-921291-50-0 Foreword Severe storms can cause dramatic changes to the coast and devastation to our settlements. If we look back through history, to the first European observations by James Cook and Joseph Banks on Endeavour in 1770, we can improve our understanding of the nature of storms and indeed climate on the east coast. In times of climate change, it is essential that we understand natural climate variability that occurs in Australia. Looking back as far as we can is essential to understand how climate is likely to behave in the future. Studying coastal climate through this chronology is one element of the process. Analysis of the records has already given an indication that east coast climate fluctuates between phases of storminess and drought that can last for decades. Although records are fragmentary and not suitable for statistical analysis, patterns and climate theory can be derived. The dependence on shipping for transport and goods since European settlement ensures a good source of information on storms that gradually improves over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logbooks of the Lady Nelson
    The Logbooks of the Lady Nelson Ida Lee The Logbooks of the Lady Nelson Table of Contents The Logbooks of the Lady Nelson...........................................................................................................................1 Ida Lee............................................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE......................................................................................................................................................2 CHAPTER 1. THE FIRST VOYAGE OF THE LADY NELSON...............................................................6 CHAPTER 2. THE LADY NELSON RETURNS TO EXPLORE BASS STRAIT: VISITS JERVIS BAY AND WESTERN PORT...................................................................................................................16 CHAPTER 3. COLONEL PATERSON AND LIEUTENANT GRANT SURVEY HUNTER RIVER....24 CHAPTER 4. MURRAY APPOINTED COMMANDER OF THE LADY NELSON: HIS VOYAGE TO NORFOLK ISLAND............................................................................................................................30 CHAPTER 5. MURRAY'S EXPLORATION OF BASS STRAIT.............................................................33 CHAPTER 6. THE DISCOVERY OF PORT PHILLIP..............................................................................46 CHAPTER 7. THE LADY NELSON AND THE INVESTIGATOR EXAMINE THE NORTH−EASTERN SHORES OF AUSTRALIA.....................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Obitel 2015 Inglêsl Color.Indd
    IBERO-AMERICAN OBSERVATORY OF TELEVISION FICTION OBITEL 2015 GENDER RELATIONS IN TELEVISION FICTION IBERO-AMERICAN OBSERVATORY OF TELEVISION FICTION OBITEL 2015 GENDER RELATIONS IN TELEVISION FICTION Maria Immacolata Vassallo de Lopes Guillermo Orozco Gómez General Coordinators Morella Alvarado, Gustavo Aprea, Fernando Aranguren, Alexandra Ayala-Marín, Catarina Burnay, Borys Bustamante, Giuliana Cassano, Pamela Cruz Páez, James Dettleff, Francisco Fernández, Francisco Hernández, Pablo Julio, Mónica Kirchheimer, Charo Lacalle, Pedro Lopes, Maria Cristina Mungioli, Guillermo Orozco Gómez, Juan Piñón, Rosario Sánchez, Luisa Torrealba and Maria Immacolata Vassallo de Lopes National Coordinators © Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A., 2015 Capa: Letícia Lampert Projeto gráfico e editoração:Niura Fernanda Souza Produção editorial: Felícia Xavier Volkweis Revisão, leitura de originais: Felícia Xavier Volkweis Revisão gráfica:Niura Fernanda Souza Editores: Luis Antônio Paim Gomes, Juan Manuel Guadelis Crisafulli Foto de capa: Louie Psihoyos. High-definition televisions in the information era. Librarian: Denise Mari de Andrade Souza – CRB 10/960 G325 Gender relations in television fiction: 2015 Obitel yearbook / general coordina- tors Maria Immacolata Vassallo de Lopes and Guillermo Orozco Gómez. -- Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2015. 526 p.; il. ISBN: 978-85-205-0738-4 1. Television – Programs. 2. Fiction – Television. 3. Programs Television – Ibero-American. 4. Media. 5. Television – Gender Relations. I. Lopes, Maria Immacolata Vassallo de. II. Gómez, Guillermo Orozco. CDU: 654.19 659.3 CDD: 301.161 791.445 Direitos desta edição adquiridos por Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. Editora Meridional Ltda. Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 440 cj. 101 – Bom Fim Cep: 90035-190 – Porto Alegre/RS Fone: (0xx51) 3311.4082 Fax: (0xx51) 2364.4194 www.editorasulina.com.br e-mail: [email protected] July/2015 INDEX INTRODUCTION............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Sherrard-3
    Joseph Sherrard first came to my notice as I was exploring the remarkable life of his great niece, Lucy Sherrard Finley (Mrs. Atkinson). I discovered that not only was Lucy an intrepid traveller and explorer but that her great uncle had also travelled far beyond English shores, indeed into the Pacific Ocean. In Joseph’s case, his adventures were undertaken as a member of His Majesty’s Navy but what makes his story so compelling for us today is that his voyages were undertaken when the Pacific was just opening up to European exploration and the settlement of New South Wales had only just begun. He sailed and rubbed shoulders with men whose names are both legends in the history of exploration and, also, famous in the history of colonial Australia. It is for this reason that, while not known to history himself, it has been possible to reconstruct so much of his fascinating story. We know from the Royal Navy Muster Book that Joseph Sherrard was born in Southwark, Surrey. One Muster record puts his year of birth as 1775 but a second Muster record, together with his death records, puts his year of birth as 1773. There would appear to be two possibilities as to his parentage. First, the register of St. George the Martyr, Southwark records the following entry for February 20, 1773: “Joseph, Son of Samuel Sherrard, Parish Clerk, and Mary Sherrard, his Wife, born this day.” However, also in the Borough of Southwark, in Rotherhithe, one York Sherrard married Elizabeth Robinson on November 1, 1773.
    [Show full text]
  • KING to BOWEN. 211 Took Place Between 21St and 28Th of April, of Which You Have Isoi
    KING TO BOWEN. 211 took place between 21st and 28th of April, of which you have isoi. been already informed, and I made it my duty to see his orders 2I Al'8' punctually performed. With respect to my passages up and down this coast in the Voyages to Colonial vessel's, I will venture to assert that very little incon- ^e Decent. venience would have occurred in them had I been able to take advantage of my own judgment, a favour which has been never granted to me, tho' the public service could not possibly have been injured by it. I enclose a list* of the officers, civil and military, and prisoners on board the Ocean, formerly at Risdon Cove. I have, &c, JOHN BOWEN. [Enclosures.] [Copies of these papers are not available.] GOVERNOR KING TO LIEUTENANT BowEN.f Sir, Sydney, 25th August, 1804. 25 Aug. I have received yours of the 21st instant informing me that you had delivered your instructions and the public stores to Lieut.-Gov'r [Collins] immediately after the arrival of the Xancy, in consequence of a General Order given for that purpose by Lieut.-Col. Collins on the 8th May. You observe that your intentions about staying at the Derwent was not understood or sufficiently explained in your letter of the 24th April. On this Proposed subject, allow me to remind you that when you arrived in the ^B^wi0" °' Ferret, your intention of resigning the situation you held at the Derwent was fully understood, not only by me, but by every person of your acquaintance, which I understood was on account of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Date of Wk * Month F Wk
    Shipwrecks about the entrance to Newcastle Harbour (From about Manning River to Central Coast) Extracted and prepared by Cynthia Hunter from Fletcher’s Wreck List References unavailable Year month date name of vessel type of vessel incident place 1800 11 NORFOLK SLP WR STOCKTON: PIRATE POINT 1804 3 12 FRANCIS SCHR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1805 6 28 TRIMMER SLP FD NEWCASTLE, OFF 1805 4 11 SURPRISE SCHR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1806 4 22 GOVERNOR KING SCHR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1808 8 15 DUNDEE SHIP WR STOCKTON BEACH 1811 3 1 PERSEVERENCE BG STD NEWCASTLE HARBOUR 1814 1 GOVERNOR HUNTER SCHR STD NEWCASTLE 1814 4 7 SPEEDWELL SLP PIRATED NEWCASTLE 1814 8 RESOURCE SCHR FD NEWCASTLE, OFF 1815 10 25 ESTRAMINA SCHR STD NEWCASTLE 1815 9 29 PILOT BOAT PIRATED NEWCASTLE 1816 1 14 ELIZABETH & MARY SCHR STD NEWCASTLE 1816 7 30 ELIZABETH HENRIETTA BG SK NEWCASTLE HARBOUR 1816 11 24 NAUTILUS BG WR OYSTER BANK 1816 1 14 ESTRAMINA SCHR WR OYSTER BANK 1817 12 ENDEAVOUR SCHR WR NOBBYS ISLAND 1820 6 13 BOAT PIRATED NEWCASTLE 1822 7 16 LIME BOAT STD STOCKTON BEACH 1823 2 CALDER BG STD STOCKTON BEACH 1825 5 11 ECLIPSE SCHR PIRATED NEWCASTLE 1825 1 2 COMMANDANT'S GIG GIG PIRATED NEWCASTLE 1825 12 20 ELIZABETH HENRIETTA BG WR NOBBYS ISLAND 1825 6 20 NEREID CTR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1826 4 9 GURNETT SCHR PIRATED(REC) NEWCASTLE 1826 4 12 MARS CTR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1826 4 13 AUSTRALIA BG WR STOCKTON BEACH 1826 7 26 SOPHIA SCHR WR STOCKTON BEACH 1827 9 6 CHARLOTTE SLP WR STOCKTON BEACH 1829 4 24 GOVERNOR ARTHUR CTR WR NOBBYS ISLAND 1830 11 15 LORD LIVERPOOL CTR SK (REC) NOBBYS ISLAND,
    [Show full text]
  • Human Services Portfolio
    Sites received not on FINAL List QLD Nerang ATTACHMENT A State Organisation Name Dalby Site QLD Dalby Crisis Support Association QLD Golden West Training QLD OzCare QLD Bridge Employment QLD Skill Centred QLD Dalby Youth & Community Centre QLD Federal Member for Maranoa Hon Bruce Scott QLD Gamba Lodge QLD Lifeline QLD Salvation Army QLD Aussie Helpers QLD MAXNetWork QLD Dalby Christian Outreach Centre Goondiwindi Site QLD Best Employment Tracey Mcdonald QLD Care Goondiwindi Colin Clarence QLD Blue Care QLD Esme Cairns, CTT QLD St Vincent De Paul QLD Community and Family Support Group QLD Drug Arm QLD My Health Rhonda Wilson QLD TAFE NSW Kay Hannan Warwick Site QLD Warwick Mental Health Team Warwick Community QLD Warwick Hospital Health Social Workers QLD Home and Community Care QLD Blue Care - Killara QLD CRS QLD Mission Australia QLD Warwick Hospital QLD St Vincent De Paul QLD Salvation Army QLD CHR QLD BEST Employment QLD Stanthorpe Supported Employment Services QLD Blue Care QLD Italian/Australian Welfare Association Ethnic Liaison Officer QLD Granite Belt Support Service Therese Crisp QLD Regional Disability Council Ian Gimm QLD Social Worker Stanthorpe Health Services Jeanette Harvey QLD Community Health Team Leader Di Leotta QLD St Vincent De Paul QLD Adult Mental Health Worker Frank Tully QLD BEST Employment QLD Warwick Supported Employment QLD Stanthorpe Specialist Employment Services Pam Burley, Youth QLD Warwick Shire Council Worker Gladstone Site QLD Alchera Park Nursing Home QLD Alcohol, Tobacco & Other Drugs Services ATTACHMENT
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Inquests, 1794; 10 June 2008 1
    New South Wales Inquests, 1794; 10 June 2008 1 SYD1794 Bench of Magistrates, Minutes of Proceedings Feb 1788 – Jan 1792, State Records N.S.W., SZ765 Murder of a Native Boy Bench of Magistrates Collins J.A., 17 October 1794 [375] Examination of the persons supposed to have murdered a Native Boy at the Hawkesbury, and the Evidence against them. ALEXANDER WILSON says that Robert Forrester informed him that he had shot a native Boy, and that he was induced to it from motives of humanity. The Boy having been previously thrown into the River by the neighbouring settlers, with his hands so tied, that it was impossible he could swim to the opposite side. ROBERT FORRESTER says that a large party of natives having appeared at the back of his Farm he alarmed his neighbours and went out to observe them. That in the road to the natives they met a Native Boy who they supposed was coming in for the purpose of discovering what arms they had. That they made him a prisoner; tied his hands behind his back [376] and delivered him to MICHAEL DOYLE to take to his [?]. That he was soon after alarmed by a cry from Doyles that the boy was escaped and had jumped into the River. That he and TWYFIELD immediately ran to the river and saw the boy swimming. That he then was prevailed on to shoot the boy by the importunities and testacies of all around. That the boy should get back to the natives and induce them to an attack by discovering there was no more than one musket in the whole neighbourhood.
    [Show full text]