DOCSLIB.ORG

Hist 72100 the History of Liberalism from Locke to Rawls Tuesday 4:15-6:15 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hist 72100 the History of Liberalism from Locke to Rawls Tuesday 4:15-6:15 P.M THE GRADUATE CENTER PH.D. PROGRAM IN HISTORY SPRING 2018 DRAFT (minor changes may be made) Professor Helena Rosenblatt Hist 72100 The History of Liberalism from Locke to Rawls Tuesday 4:15-6:15 p.m. 3 credits [email protected] Course Description: This course is an in-depth introduction to some of the founding thinkers and texts of the liberal tradition. We will read canonical texts and works of interpretation in an effort to answer questions such as: What do we mean when we speak of liberalism? What if any, are its core principles and values? What is alive and what is dead in the liberal tradition? We will focus on works by Locke, Wollstonecraft, Rousseau, Constant, Mill, Green, Spencer, Hobhouse, Hayek and Berlin, and finish with an examination of Rawls. Main themes: Property and the Role of Government; Women’s Rights and Roles; Social Contract and the Individual; Morals, Empire and Race. Course Learning Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, students should be able to *Read texts more critically and effectively *Identify and summarize key arguments in texts in an articulate and persuasive manner, verbally and in writing *Demonstrate an understanding of the principal ideas in the history of liberalism Course Requirements: *Regular and intelligent class participation demonstrating thorough reading of all assigned materials: 30% *One-page analytical summaries of the weekly readings and two interesting discussion questions for each class: 30% (Summaries must be handed to me at the beginning of class; questions must be emailed to me and the class by 8 a.m. on Tuesday) (FIVE over the course of the term) *A 20 page paper on one liberal text. Topics must be decided and approved by March 13; final paper submitted by May 14. No late papers will be accepted. 40% Jan 30 Introduction: What is Liberal about Liberalism? Stephen Holmes, The Anatomy of Anti-Liberalism, Harvard U Press, 1993, as much as you can read but definitely preface, introduction and conclusion. Fareed Zakaria, “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol 76, no 6 (Nov-Dec 1997), pp. 22-43. Feb 6 Method Quentin Skinner “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory, 8 (1969), 3-53. Jack Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl,” History and Theory vol 23, no 2 (May 1984), pp. 151- 169. ‘Editors’ Introduction’, and James Parr, ‘Understanding Conceptual Change Politically’, in Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge, 1989). Texts will be provided. Feb 13 John Locke: Two Treatises of Government A) Social Compact and Property Two Treatises of Government C.B.McPherson, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, ch V: Locke: The Political Theory of Appropriation’ Feb 20 NO CLASS (Classes follow Monday schedule) Feb 27 John Locke: Two Treatises of Government B) Women and Slavery. Butler, Melissa. “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy” in Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Pateman Carole eds. Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Text will be provided Ruth W. Grant, “John Locke on Women and the Family,” in Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Ian Shapiro, Editor, Yale University Press, p. 286-308. Holly Brewer, “Slavery, Sovereignty and “Inheritable Blood”: Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery,” American Historical Review, vol 122, issue 4 (October 2017) March 6 Wollstonecraft and the Birth of Feminism A Vindication of the Rights of Woman Hirsch, Pamela. “Mary Wollstonecraft: A Problematic Legacy,” in Clarissa Campbell-Orr, ed., Wollstonecraft’s Daughters: Womanhood in England and France, 1780-1920, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996, pp. 43-60. Text will be provided Nussbaum, Martha C. "The Feminist Critique of Liberalism," The Lindley Lecture, The University of Kansas 1997. Text will be provided Schaeffer, Denise. "Feminism and Liberalism Reconsidered," American Political Science Review vol 95, no. 3, (Sep, 2001), pp. 699-708. March 13 Rousseau and Democracy Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract. There are many easily obtainable editions. James Miller, Rousseau. Dreamer of Democracy, chapter 5. Text will be provided. March 20 Benjamin Constant, Theorist of Liberalism Benjamin Constant, The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation, Part One (“The Spirit of Conquest”) Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments (1815 version) Beware that the oll. Libertyfund version is NOT the 1815 version, despite the fact that it implies that it is. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns” All three texts can be found in Constant, Political Writings, ed. Biancamaria Fontana, Cambridge University Press, 1993. March 27 John Stuart Mill and Individuality On Liberty The Subjection of Women Both can be found in On Liberty and The Subjection of Women, Alan Ryan ed., Penguin Classics. They can also be found at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mill-on-liberty-and-the-subjection-of-women-1879-ed Susan Moller Okin, “John Stuart Mill, Liberal Feminist”, in Women in Western Political Thought., PUP 1979. Pp. 197-230. March 30-April 8 Spring Break April 10 Liberalism and Empire Jennifer Pitts, A Turn to Empire. The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France, intro and chapter 5. Uday Mehta, Liberalism and Empire. A Study in Nineteenth Century British Liberal thought Chapts 1-4 Gregory Claeys, Imperial Sceptics, British Critics of Empire, 1850-1920, ch 3. A Ryan, ‘Introduction’, J. S. Mill’s Encounter with India, M. I. Moir, D. Peers, and L. Zastoupil eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999, pp. 3–17. April 17 Two Kinds of Liberalism: Laissez-faire or the Welfare State Herbert Spencer, The Proper Sphere of Government, twelve letters (1842-3) or Man versus the State, 1884 both available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spencer-the-man-versus-the-state-with-six-essays-on-government- society-and-freedom-lf-ed and T.H. Hill, “Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract” 1880 https://books.google.com/books?id=BuChaIE- Z4UC&pg=PA365&lpg=PA365&dq=T.H.E.+Hill+liberal+contract&source=bl&ots=yQ2056Ex G3&sig=_MyL_YJN3OrMAUape- iRyAfwq3g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiLjLft09TXAhXtSN8KHdoUADIQ6AEIRzAF#v=o nepage&q=T.H.E.%20Hill%20liberal%20contract&f=false and selections from LT Hobhouse, Liberalism, pages tba https://www.gutenberg.org/files/28278/28278-h/28278-h.htm April 24 Race Science and Eugenics. Michael Freeden, “Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity,” Historical Journal vol 22, no 3. (September, 1979) pp. 645-71. Domenico Losurdo, Liberalism. A Counter-History, transl Gregory Elliott, Verso: 2011, chapters one and two Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era, pages tba. May 1 John Dewey, F. A. Hayek, Isaiah Berlin John Dewey, selected essays. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, Bruce Caldwell, ed., The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, vol II, University of Chicago Press, 2007, pages to be announced. Isaiah Berlin, “Two Concepts of Liberty” May 8 Rawls John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pages to be announced. May 15 The Stakes http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1988/10/5/the-dreaded-l-word-pbpbresident-reagan- criticizing/ Selections from/reviews of Pierre Manent and Larry Siedentop, Mark Lilla https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/does-trumps-rise-mean-liberalisms-end https://www.npr.org/2017/04/04/522554630/francis-fukuyama-on-why-liberal-democracy-is-in- trouble .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Arrogance: Why 'Western' Liberalism Won't Save Latin America
    LSE Latin America and Caribbean Blog: One hundred years of arrogance: why ‘Western’ liberalism won’t save Latin America Page 1 of 4 One hundred years of arrogance: why ‘Western’ liberalism won’t save Latin America Liberalism is often seen as a Western gift to the world that became tragically warped on contact with less developed nations. But where once the region’s intellectuals themselves subscribed to this vision, more recent scholarship shows that Latin American countries charted their own courses towards “liberal” rights and constitutions. Despite even the recent ravages of neoliberalism, the key tenets and institutions of liberalism remain deeply popular, write Catherine Andrews (CIDE, Mexico) and Ariadna Acevedo Rodrigo (Cinvestav, Mexico). • Disponible también en español (versión extendida) In a recent article musing on the state of governance in Latin America, The Economist‘s columnist Bello asks himself whether “liberal ideas suffer in the region because they are imported”. He thinks so, but he nonetheless encourages Latin Americans to persist with them because they will bring “equality of opportunity” and “better public services at an affordable cost”. In a single stroke, Bello resolves all of liberalism’s contradictions and limitations by absolving it of blame for failing in Latin America. It is not liberalism – an “imported” idea – but rather its faulty application, which is in crisis. He conveniently forgets that the 2008 financial crisis left liberalism in crisis everywhere. He also overlooks at least two decades of research
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Volume 4 (2004) Page 397
    H-France Review Volume 4 (2004) Page 397 H-France Review Vol. 4 (November 2004), No. 113 Alan S. Kahan, Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York, N.Y: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. vii + 239 pp. Notes, works cited, and index. $69.95 US (hb). ISBN 1-4039-1174-6. Review by Jean Elisabeth Pedersen, Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester. Alan Kahan’s new book on liberalism in nineteenth-century Europe represents a thoughtful attempt to define the core characteristics of that rich and complex intellectual tradition by focusing on liberals’ parliamentary debates over how to institute various forms of limited suffrage in England, France, and the German states before and after unification in the period from 1830 to 1885. Kahan’s earlier work has illuminated the intellectual biographies of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and, especially, Alexis de Tocqueville; his new project now explores the political and intellectual history of the more general national movements in which these three figures played such important parts.[1] Kahan initially presents nineteenth-century liberals in familiar terms as “both the confident heirs of Voltaire and the frightened successors of Robespierre” (p. 1), or, in other words, as historical figures who hoped to sponsor progressive reform without provoking either radical revolution or conservative reaction. Unlike those historians, social theorists, and political activists who have defined liberals in economic terms by focusing on their commitment to the preservation of private property, however, Kahan seeks to define liberals in political terms by focusing instead on their commitment to what he calls “the discourse of capacity” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Liberal Utilitarianism: Bentham and Mill Piers Norris
    The Rise of Liberal Utilitarianism: Bentham and Mill Piers Norris Turner, Ohio State University [DRAFT: final version forthcoming in The Blackwell Companion to 19th Century Philosophy, ed. J.A. Shand] I. Introduction By the turn of the nineteenth century, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was a well-known moral and legal reformer. A child of the Enlightenment, writing at the time of the American and French revolutions, Bentham had offered wide-ranging critiques of customary institutions and ways of thinking. He was particularly critical of appeals to natural law and intuition that, consciously or not, provided mere cover stories for people’s preferences. Such appeals, he argued, fail to provide real reasons: The various systems that have been formed concerning the standard of right and wrong… consist all of them in so many contrivances for avoiding the obligation of appealing to any external standard, and for prevailing upon the reader to accept of the author’s sentiment or opinion as a reason in itself. (An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation [IPML], II.14; B i.8)1 Because these cover stories are guided by people’s preferences, Bentham also argued that they are incapable of grounding a principled and well-organized set of public institutions. They instead protect established powers, whose likes and dislikes carry the most weight. His earliest writings, for instance, detail how the vagaries of the common law served entrenched interests rather than the public at large. What Bentham needed was a public principle that could guide a scientific program of legal codification and political reform.
    [Show full text]
  • [5] Mill Selections from on Liberty
    On Liberty Mill, John Stuart Published: 1859 Categorie(s): Non-Fiction, Human Science, Philosophy Source: Feedbooks 1 About Mill: John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873), English philo- sopher, political theorist, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century whose works on liberty justified freedom of the individual in opposition to unlimited state control. He was an exponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, although his conception of it was very differ- ent from Bentham's. He clearly set forth the premises of the scientific method. Also available on Feedbooks for Mill: • Utilitarianism (1863) Note: This book is brought to you by Feedbooks http://www.feedbooks.com Strictly for personal use, do not use this file for commercial purposes. 2 "The grand, leading principle, towards which every argument unfolded in these pages directly converges, is the absolute and essential importance of human development in its richest diversity." Wilhelm von Humboldt, Sphere and Duties of Government 3 To the beloved and deplored memory of her who was the in- spirer, and in part the author, of all that is best in my writ- ings—the friend and wife whose exalted sense of truth and right was my strongest incitement, and whose approbation was my chief reward—I dedicate this volume. Like all that I have written for many years, it belongs as much to her as to me; but the work as it stands has had, in a very insufficient degree, the inestimable advantage of her revision; some of the most im- portant portions having been reserved for a more careful re-ex- amination, which they are now never destined to receive.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Liberalism: an Assessment of Liberal Political Thought from the 17Th Century to Today
    Review of Contemporary Philosophy Vol. 14, 2015, pp. 11–36, ISSN 1841-5261 IN PRAISE OF LIBERALISM: AN ASSESSMENT OF LIBERAL POLITICAL THOUGHT FROM THE 17TH CENTURY TO TODAY MICHAEL B. FRIEDMAN [email protected] School of Social Work, Columbia University ABSTRACT. The author of this essay maintains that liberalism has been the primary source of progressive change in the United States since its earliest history. To support his claim, he traces the philosophical and political history of liberalism in England and the United States. The specific forms of liberalism have varied in different periods of history; but, he maintains, there is an underlying spirit of liberalism that has persisted throughout the past 350 years and can be the source of dynamic progressive social change in the 21st century. Throughout history, he maintains, liberalism has been committed to social progress and has sought to improve the lives of populations that are economically and politically disadvantaged. This underlying spirit, the author argues, can be the source for an energized liberal agenda for the 21st century. Keywords: liberalism; political philosophy; political history 1. Introduction Conservative – and even centrist – opponents of liberalism reject it because they identify it with cumbersome government; reckless spending; high tax- ation; naiveté about economics, crime, and world power; and lack of moral values. What a mistake! In fact, liberalism has been the source of social and political progress in the Western world since the 17th century. The idea that rights set a limit on the legitimate power of government is a liberal idea. The idea that govern- ment must respect the liberty of individuals is a liberal idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace
    MONTESQUIEU ON COMMERCE, CONQUEST, WAR, AND PEACE Robert Howse* I. INTRODUCTION:COMMERCE AS THE AGENT OF PEACE:MONTESQUIEU AND THE IDEOLOGY OF LIBERALISM n the history of liberalism, Montesquieu, who died two hundred and Ififty years ago, is an iconic figure. Montesquieu is cited as the source of the idea of checks and balances, or separation of powers, and thus as an intellectual inspiration of the American founding.1 Among liberal internationalists, Montesquieu is known above all for the notion that international trade leads to peace among nation-states. When liberal international relations theorists such as Michael Doyle attribute this posi- tion to Montesquieu,2 they cite Book XX of the Spirit of the Laws,3 in which Montesquieu claims: “The natural effect of commerce is to bring peace. Two nations that negotiate between themselves become recipro- cally dependent, if one has an interest in buying and the other in selling. And all unions are based on mutual needs.”4 On its own, Montesquieu’s claim raises many issues. Montesquieu’s point is that trade based on mutual dependency discourages war. Here, Montesquieu abstracts entirely from the relative power of the states in question, a concern that is pervasive in his concrete analyses of relation- ships among political communities. For example, later on in the same section of the Spirit of the Laws he mentions that trade relations between Carthage and Marseille led to jealousy and a security conflict: There were, in the early times, great wars between Carthage and Mar- seille concerning the fishery. After the peace, they competed in eco- nomic commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech C. Edwin Baker* Given the Evils of Hate, Any Argument for Protecting Is, at Best, an Uphill Effort And, at Worst, Simply Misguided
    Hate Speech C. Edwin Baker* Given the evils of hate, any argument for protecting is, at best, an uphill effort and, at worst, simply misguided. Many people either accept or, at least, wonder whether they should accept, an argument that goes something like this: Anyone sensitive to the horror of genocide knows that hate pervades the atmosphere at such times. Few goals can rank higher than preventing genocide and the murderous racial conflicts presented to the world during the twentieth century. Moreover, it is difficult to find any value in the freedom to engage in racist hate speech. Important but ultimately less significant values such as free speech cannot, for any sensitive person, lead to any pause in outlawing the speech that contributes to these horrors. Whether or not the ban will be effective in even a few cases at preventing genocide or racial violence, the mere possibility that it will more than justifies the ban. As an advocate of almost absolute protection of free speech, I should explain the grounds for my valuation of free speech and rejection of the above claim. That explanation, it turns out, is too ambitious for this essay. Nevertheless, Part I describes but does not defend a theory of why racist or hate speech should be protected – a theory that I believe provides the best, though often unrecognized, explanation of existing American case law but one that is surely a controversial, probably minority, view even in the United States. Most readers will realize, as do I, that these theoretical grounds do not really answer my imagined proponent of regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom
    Anne Barron Kant, copyright and communicative freedom Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Barron, Anne (2011) Kant, copyright and communicative freedom. Law and philosophy . pp. 1- 48. DOI: 10.1007/s10982-011-9114-1 © 2011 Springer Netherlands. The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37521/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2011 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom forthcoming, Law and Philosophy (2011) Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom Anne Barron, Law Department, London School of Economics and Political Science Abstract The rapid recent expansion of copyright law worldwide has sparked efforts to defend the ‘public domain’ of non-propertized information, often on the ground that an expansive public domain is a condition of a ‘free culture.
    [Show full text]
  • On Liberty John Stuart Mill Batoche Books
    On Liberty John Stuart Mill 1859 Batoche Books Kitchener 2001 Batoche Books Limited 52 Eby Street South Kitchener, Ontario N2G 3L1 Canada email: [email protected] Contents Chapter 1: Introductory...................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion. .................... 18 Chapter 3: Of Individuality, as one of the Elements of Well-being. 52 Chapter 4: Of the Limits to the Authority of Society over the Indi- vidual. ........................................................................................ 69 Chapter 5: Applications. .................................................................. 86 Notes .............................................................................................. 106 Dedication The grand, leading principle, towards which every argument unfolded in these pages directly converges, is the absolute and essential impor- tance of human development in its richest diversity. Wilhelm von Humboldt: Sphere and Duties of Government. To the beloved and deplored memory of her who was the inspirer, and in part the author, of all that is best in my writings- the friend and wife whose exalted sense of truth and right was my strongest incitement, and whose approbation was my chief reward—I dedicate this volume. Like all that I have written for many years, it belongs as much to her as to me; but the work as it stands has had, in a very insufficient degree, the inestimable advantage of her revision; some of the most important por- tions having been reserved for a more careful re-examination, which they are now never destined to receive. Were I but capable of interpret- ing to the world one half the great thoughts and noble feelings which are buried in her grave, I should be the medium of a greater benefit to it, than is ever likely to arise from anything that I can write, unprompted and unassisted by her all but unrivalled wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Libertarian Philosophy of John Stuart Mill
    THE LIBERTARIAN PHILOSOPHY OF JOHN STUART MILL NICHOLASCAPALDI* Queens College OHN STUARTMILL'S ESSAY On Liberty has been praised and at- J tacked for many reasons and from many different perspectives, but one aspect of Mill's work that has been overlooked is a conception of freedom that was new to the British political tradition. I shall focus on that novel conception of freedom in order to show that it is more properly understood as libertarian, not liberal, and to demonstrate how this conception of freedom sheds light both on a number of other ideas in Mill's social philosophy and on the evolution of his thinking. There are two major obstacles to the comprehension of Mill's novel conception of freedom. First, we need a terminological clarification of the meaning in this context of libertarian and liberal. Second, the belief that Mill is "the" expostulator of liberalism is so widely held by both admirers and critics that it has achieved a kind of textbook status. It is this presupposition that largely distorts the reading of Mill and the result of this distortion is that we are denied access to valuable insights.' Reason Papers No. 9 (Winter 1983) 3-19. Copyright @ 1983 by the Reason Foundation. REASON PAPERS NO. 9 Let us turn to the terminological issue first. By iibertarian 1 mean the mora! position that the paramount value is individual liberty. This mora! position has social, political, arid economic implications, all of which are exhibited in the social philosophy of Mill. There are, of course, numerous individuals and positions that are vaguely and sometimes incongruously ideritified as libertarian, and in the popular mind libertarians tend to be narrowly viewed as holding only an economic position favorable to iaissez-fake.2 Nevertheless what all of these positions share is a conviction of the supreme importance of in- dividual liberty and a commitment to its principled adherence, however much they may disagree on the detaiied principled defense.
    [Show full text]
  • JS Mill's Political Thought
    P1: JZZ 0521860202pre CUFX079B/Urbinati 0 521 86020 2 cupusbw December 26, 2006 7:38 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: JZZ 0521860202pre CUFX079B/Urbinati 0 521 86020 2 cupusbw December 26, 2006 7:38 J. S. MILL’S POLITICAL THOUGHT The year 2006 marked the two hundredth anniversary of John Stuart Mill’s birth. Although his philosophical reputation has varied greatly in the interven- ing years, it is now clear that Mill ranks among the most influential modern political thinkers. Yet despite his enduring influence, and perhaps also because of it, the breadth and complexity of Mill’s political thought is often under- appreciated. Although his writings remain a touchstone for debates over liberty and liberalism, many other important dimensions of his political philosophy have until recently been mostly ignored or neglected. This volume aims, first, to correct such neglect by illustrating the breadth and depth of Mill’s political writings. It does so by drawing togetheracollection of essays whose authors explore underappreciated elements of Mill’s political philosophy, including his democratic theory, his writings on international relations and military inter- ventions, and his treatments of socialism and despotism. Second, the volume shows how Mill’s thinking remains pertinent to our own political life in three broad areas – democratic institutions and culture, liberalism, and international politics – and offers a critical reassessment of Mill’s political philosophy in light of recent political developments and transformations. Nadia Urbinati
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Plato, Benjamin Constant and John Stuart Mill on Justice As a Political Virtue and on Political Conformity Platon, Benjamin
    ELIOPOULOS, P. EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ (2019) PLATO, BENJAMIN CONSTANT AND JOHN STUART MILL ON JUSTICE AS A POLITICAL VIRTUE AND ON POLITICAL CONFORMITY Panos ELIOPOULOS ABSTRACT Most often political conformity is taken as a prerequisite for the establishment and implementation of justice, even in the most democratic of states. Nonetheless, it remains as a question whether the particular conformity meddles positively or negatively with the way individuals realize their political goals within a Polity. In our analysis, we attempt to explore how three different thinkers conceive of this necessity of the political conformity and to what degree. On the one hand, John Stuart Mill sides with a conception of justice that defends individual freedom and prevents a great deal of political conformity, whereas he wishes this freedom to be exercised along with reason. Like Plato, he defends the admission that a person’s character is paramount in social progress but also in the pursuit for human happiness. Constant, on the other hand, declines ancient theories of political participation and sovereignty as outdated, claiming that individual rights and the pursuit of personal interests are highly significant. As Constant risks a higher degree of conformity, with the further risk of abolishing justice under the rule of a demagogic government, Plato states as a necessity the hierarchical precedence of the Polis to the person but with an eye to the self-fulfillment of the individual, without disregarding the political basis. Keywords: Mill, Plato, Constant, Conformity, Justice, Political PLATON, BENJAMİN CONSTANT VE JOHN STUART MILL'İN, POLİTİK BİR DEĞER OLARAK ADALET VE POLİTİK UYGUNLUK ÜZERİNE GÖRÜŞLERİ ÖZET Çoğu zaman politik uygunluk, en demokratik devletlerde bile adaletin kurulması ve uygulanması için ön şart olarak kabul edilir.
    [Show full text]