DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Contraception Reproductive Health Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Contraception Reproductive Health Care The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Volume 9 Supplement 1 Editor-in-Chief Published quarterly George Creatsas, Greece June 2004 ISSN: 1362-5187 Editors Carmen Coll Capdevila, Spain Sven O. Skouby, Denmark ESC JOURNAL COMMITTEE L. Iglesias-Cortit, Spain D. Serfaty, France R. van Lunsen, The Netherlands D. Wildemeersch, Belgium M. van Santen, Germany The Official Journal of the European Society of EDITORIAL BOARD Contraception J. J. Amy, Belgium L. Kova´cs, Hungary E. Aubeny, France S. Michalas, Greece R. Beerthuizen, The Netherlands J. Newton, United Kingdom G. Benagiano, WHO M. Oliveira Da Silva, Portugal V. Bruni, Italy K. R. Petersen, Denmark S. Dexeus, Spain T. Rabe, Germany A. R. Genazzani, Italy V. Unzeitig, Czech Republic P. C. Hannaford, United Kingdom A. Verougstraete, Belgium X. Iglesias, Spain U. H. Winkler, Germany E. Ketting, The Netherlands The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Volume 9 Supplement 1 Published quarterly June 2004 ISSN: 1362-5187 Programme and Book of Abstracts of The 8th Congress of The European Society of Contraception Edinburgh, 23–26 June, 2004 The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Subscription Information: The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care is a peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly by Taylor and Francis Ltd, 4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN, UK. Annual subscriptions, Volume 9, 2004 Individual $148 £90 Institutional $241 £146 An institutional subscription to the print edition (ISSN 1362-5187) includes free access for any number of concurrent users across a local area network to the online edition. Members of The European Society of Contraception receive a subscription to the journal as part of their membership fee. For more information, visit our website: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals. For a complete and up-to-date guide to Taylor & Francis Group’s journals and books publishing programmes, and details of advertising in our journals, visit our website: http://www.tandf.co.uk Dollar rates apply to subscribers in all countries except the UK and the Republic of Ireland where the pound sterling price applies. All subscriptions are payable in advance and all rates include postage. Journals are sent by air to the USA, Canada, Mexico, India, Japan and Australasia. Subscriptions are entered on an annual basis, i.e., January to December. Payment may be made by sterling cheque, dollar cheque, international money order, National Giro, or credit card (Amex, Visa, Mastercard). The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care (USPS permit pending) is published four times a year in March, June, September and December. The 2004 US institutional subscription price is $241. Periodicals postage pending at Champlain, NY, by US Mail Agent IMS of New York, 100 Walnut Street, Champlain, NY. US Postmaster: Please send address changes to tIDS, PO Box 1518, Champlain, NY 12919, USA. Ordering information: USA/Canada: Taylor & Francis Inc., Journals Department, 325 Chestnut Street, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA. EU/Rest of World: Taylor & Francis Ltd., Rankine Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK RG24 8PR. Advertising enquiries to: USA/Canada: The Advertising Manager, Taylor & Francis Inc., 325 Chestnut Street, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA. Tel: +1 (215) 625 8900. Fax: +1 (215) 625 2240. EU/Rest of World: The Advertising Manager, Taylor & Francis Ltd., 4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom OX14 4RN. Tel: +44 (0)1235 828600. Fax: +44 (0)1235 829000. The print edition of this journal is typeset by Elite Typesetting Techniques Ltd., Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK, and printed on ANSI conforming acid free paper by The Charlesworth Group, Huddersfield, UK. The online addition of this journal is hosted by Ingenta. Copyright # 2004 Taylor & Francis Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted, or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from Taylor & Francis Limited, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed, in writing. Taylor & Francis Limited grants authorization for individuals to photocopy copyright material for private research use, on the sole basis that requests for such use are referred directly to the requestor’s local Reproduction Rights Organization (RRO). The copyright fee is $19 for STM exclusive of any charge or fee levied. In order to contact your local RRO, please contact International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organizations (IFRRO), rue du Prince Royal, 87, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium; email: [email protected]; Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; email: [email protected]; Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK W1P 0LP; email: [email protected]. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Volume 9 Supplement 1 Published quarterly June 2004 ISSN: 1362-5187 Contents The Scientific Programme 1 Abstracts of Invited Speakers 11 Abstracts of Free Communications 29 Abstracts of Posters 51 Abstracts of Symposia 191 Author Index 197 The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care is the official Journal of the European Society of Contraception, founded in 1988 in Paris, and is indexed in Index Medicus/MEDLINE, EMBASE/ Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents and Family Index Database v The Scientific Programme The numbers in the right-hand column are the numbers of the abstracts of the presentations The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 1 The 8th Congress of The European Society of Contraception Scientific Programme WEDNESDAY,JUNE 23, 2004 17:30–18:30 Opening Ceremony Pentland Suite 17.30–17.35 Welcome Address S. Skouby and J. Newton (Presidents) 17.35–17.40 Faculty President and Introduction of D. Baird A. Bigrigg (UK) 17.40–17.50 Edinburgh’s history: how the Scots invented the modern world! D. Baird (UK) 17.50–17.55 Introduction of P. Hannaford J. Newton (UK) 17.55–18.10 Performance 18.10–18.30 What is the Conference about? What does holism mean and what is its relevance? P. Hannaford (UK) THURSDAY,JUNE 24, 2004 08:30–10:00 State of the Art Session 1: Sexually transmitted infections Pentland Suite 08:30–08:50 STIs – trends and epidemiology IS-01 M. van de Laar (The Netherlands) 08:50–09:10 User issues/holistic model IS-02 J. Adams (UK) 09:10–09:30 Integrated sexual health services IS-03 P. Greenhouse (UK) 9.30–10.00 Q & A Free Communications 1: Different contraceptive methods Tinto Room 08:30–08:35 Introduction by chairmen 08:35–08:45 Removal techniques for deep sub-dermal, sub-fascial & intramuscular FC1-01 Implanon contraceptive implants: experience of a Fertility Control Unit B.A. Gbolade (UK) 08:45–08:55 Study on the effects of a single implant containing nomegestrol acetate FC1-02 (Uniplant) on the hormonal profile, endometrial morphology and ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian function I. Barbosa (Brazil) 08:55–09:05 A new highly effective subcutaneous contraceptive injection FC1-03 A. Jakimiuk (Poland) 09:05–09:15 A randomised controlled trial to determine the impact of fertility FC1-04 awareness education on the behaviour, knowledge and attitudes of condom users C. Pyper (UK) 09:15–09:25 A comparison of Pearl indices and cumulative incidences for use in FC1-05 meta-analysis of contraception trials P. O’Brien (UK) 09:25–09:35 Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new T-shaped FC1-06 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems – first clinical report D. Wildemeersch (Belgium) 2 The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care The 8th Congress of The European Society of Contraception Scientific Programme 09:35–09:45 Living comfort at 1 year after placement of subcutaneous etonorgestrel FC1-07 G. Donders (Belgium) 9.45–10.00 Chairman’s summing up 08:30–10:00 Workshop/Forum 1: Tailoring services for adolescents Moorfoot Room Introduction D. Apter (Finland) Tailoring services D. Apter (Finland) Types of services A. Hadley (UK) Information and technology S. Van der Doef (The Netherlands) 08:30–10:00 Society/country slot 1: Nouveaux concepts en contraception Harris 1 + 2 (Society of French Speaking Countries of Contraception) Nouveau regard sur les dispositifs intra-ute´rins D. Serfaty (France) Risque cardio-vasculaire de la pilule en 2004 – Actualite´et perspectives T. Farley (OMS, Switzerland) Inte´reˆt d’un nouveau progestatif, la nestorone, en contraception R. Sitruk-Ware (USA) Demain: des pilules sur mesure a` base de ste´rodes tissus-spe´cifiques? P. Bouchard (France) 08:30–10:00 Workshop/Forum 2: Edinburgh contribution to reproductive Kilsyth Room and sexual health Introduction A. Glasier (UK) The uterus as a target for contraception and therapeutic invention H. Jabbour (UK) Falling sperm counts – should men blame their mothers? R. Sharpe (UK) No need to bleed – contraception and amenorrhoea D. Baird (UK) Emergency contraception probably won’t change the world A. Glasier (UK) 10:00–10:30 Break 10:30–12:00 Keynote Session 1: Contraception from a holistic perspective Pentland Suite 10:30–10:35 Introduction 10:35–11:00 Benefit and harm IS-04 J. Drife (UK) 11:00–11:15 Contraception from a holistic perspective – a user view IS-05 T. Belfield (UK) 11:15–11:30 Holistic approach to contraception – the role of the provider IS-06 M. Short (Ireland) 11:30–11:45 Contraception – the holistic approach regarding services – sustainable IS-07 contraceptive health care: how, who, where O. Loeber (The Netherlands) 11:45–12:00 Discussion 12:00–14:30 Lunch and Poster viewing The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 3 The 8th Congress of The European Society of Contraception Scientific Programme 12:00–14:15 Symposium 1: New trends in European contraception (Schering) Lomond Suite Introduction S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explaining the Exceptional Behaviour of the Portuguese Church Hierarchy in Morality Politics
    Shunning Direct Intervention: Explaining the Exceptional Behaviour of the Portuguese church Hierarchy in Morality Politics by Madalena Meyer Resende (FCSH-UNL and IPRI-UNL) and Anja Hennig (European University Viadrina) Abstract Why are the Catholic churches in most European countries politically active in relevant morality policy issues while the Portuguese hierarchy has remained reserved during mobilizing debates such as abortion and same-sex marriage, whose laws’ recent changes go against Catholic beliefs? The explanation could be institutional, as the fairly recent Portuguese transition to democracy dramatically changed the role attributed to the church by the former regimes. However, in Spain – whose case is similar to Portugal in matters of timing and political conditions – the hierarchy’s behaviour is different. This begs the question: what elements explain the exceptionality of the Portuguese case? This article shows that the Portuguese case illustrates an element usually not emphasized in the literature: the ideological inclination of the church elites. The article thus concludes that institutional access is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for the church to directly intervene in morality policy processes. A church may have access to influence political decision makers but, for ideological reasons, may be unwilling to use it. Keywords: Portugal, morality policy, Catholic church, Vatican Council II, abortion, gay-marriage, ideology, historical institutionalism Introduction the church from the policy-making arena. As we The recent debate in the Portuguese parliament will show, up until 2013, the Portuguese hierar- (July 2015) about restricting the 2007 liberal- chy showed great restraint during the process of ized abortion law in Portugal revealed a novum moral-political liberalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Conscientious Objection to the Provision of Reproductive Healthcare
    Volume 123, Supplement 3 (2013) Amsterdam • Boston • London • New York • Oxford • Paris • Philadelphia • San Diego • St. Louis International Journal of GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS Editor: T. Johnson (USA) Editor Emeritus: J. Sciarra (USA) Associate Editor: W. Holzgreve (Germany) P. Serafini (Brazil) J. Fortney (USA) Associate Editor Emeritus: L. Keith (USA) Managing Editor: C. Addington (UK) Manuscript Editor: P. Chapman (UK) Honorary Associate Editor: L. Hamberger (Sweden) Associate Editors Ethical and Legal Issues R. Cook (Canada) in Reproductive Health: B. Dickens (Canada) Enabling Technologies: M. Hammoud (USA) FIGO Staging of Gynecologic Cancer: L. Denny (South Africa) Contemporary Issues in R. Adanu (Ghana) Women’s Health: V. Boama (South Africa) V. Guinto (Philippines) C. Sosa (Uruguay) Statistical Consultant: A. Vahratian (USA) Editorial Office: FIGO Secretariat, FIGO House Suite 3 - Waterloo Court, 10 Theed Street, London, SE1 8ST, UK Tel: +44 20 7928 1166 Fax: +44 20 7928 7099 E-mail: [email protected] Supplement to International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Volume 123, Supplement 3 Conscientious objection to the provision of reproductive healthcare Guest Editor: Wendy Chavkin MD, MPH Publication of this supplement was made possible with support from Ford Foundation and an anonymous donor. We thank all Global Doctors for Choice funders for making the project possible. © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved. 0020-7292/06/$32.00 This journal and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and the following terms and conditions apply to their use: Photocopying Single photocopies of single articles may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health
    APRIL 2019 Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health Please use and share widely: www.ipas.org/clinicalupdates Also available in Spanish: www.ipas.org/actualizacionesclinicas For more information, email [email protected] CURH-E19 April 2019 © 2019 Ipas. Produced in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Ipas. (2019). Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health. L. Castleman & N. Kapp (Eds.). Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas. Ipas works globally to improve access to safe abortion and contraception so that every woman and girl can determine her own future. Across Africa, Asia and Latin America, we work with partners to make safe abortion and contraception widely available, to connect women with vital information so they can access safe services, and to advocate for safe, legal abortion. Cover photos, left to right: © Ipas; © Richard Lord; © Benjamin Porter Ipas is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All contributions to Ipas are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. For more information or to donate to Ipas: Ipas P.O. Box 9990 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA 1-919-967-7052 www.ipas.org APRIL 2019 Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health Medical Editor: Nathalie Kapp Medical Director: Laura Castleman Lead Writer: Emily Jackson Clinical advisory team: Sangeeta Batra, India Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Nepal Abiyot Belai, Ethiopia Steve Luboya, Zambia Guillermo Ortiz, United States Claudia Martinez Lopez, Mexico Bill Powell, United States ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to those who contributed to this and previous versions of Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health: Rebecca Allen Lynn Borgatta Dalia Brahmi Anne Burke Catherine Casino Talemoh Dah Gillian Dean Alison Edelman Courtney Firestine Mary Fjerstad Bela Ganatra Vinita Goyal Joan Healy Bliss Kaneshiro Ann Leonard Radha Lewis Patricia Lohr Alice Mark (Founding Editor) Lisa Memmel Karen Padilla Regina Renner Cristião Rosas Laura Schoedler Clinical Updates topics are determined through queries gathered from Ipas-supported train- ings and programs in the public and private health sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies
    This is a repository copy of Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies. Book Review. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/98822/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Krajewska, A. orcid.org/0000-0001-9096-1056 (2016) Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies. Book Review. Medical Law Review, 24 (2). pp. 290-296. ISSN 0967-0742 https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv041 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies REBECCA J COOK, JOANNA N ERDMAN, BERNARD M DICKENS (eds.) Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014, 480 pp., hardback, £45.50, 9780812246278 Atina Krajewska, Sheffield Law School, University of Sheffield, England, [email protected] For a while at least, it seemed that proponents and opponents of decriminalisation and liberalisation of abortion laws had become entrenched in their well-known positions and that national legislators and politicians had reached a form of, usually fragile, consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fetal Cannibalism Planned Parenthood Style in China They Eat Babies; Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs
    Volume 25, Number 5 September-October 2015 A review and analysis of worldwide population control activity Fetal Cannibalism Planned Parenthood Style In China they eat babies; Planned Parenthood kills them and then sells their organs. Which is worse? By Steven Mosher and Jonathan Abbamonte On the menu of some exclusive Chinese restaurants is an item that goes by the name of Spare Rib Soup. Very expensive, it is usually served only in the back rooms to known customers, who are willing to pay to premium for this delicacy. So what is Spare Rib Soup? Brace yourselves. Spare Rib Soup is actually a human soup, made from the bodies of aborted babies. It is regarded by the Chinese—at least some Chinese—as a rejuvenating potion. A kind of fountain of youth that will fix sagging wrinkles, grow back missing hair, and generally put a spring back in your step. Shutterstock All of which is quite simply discusses the importance of not nonsense. crushing the organs so she “can get INSIDE THIS ISSUE But I thought of Spare Rib Soup it all intact” will stay with you a long Fetal Cannibalism 1 when I watched the video of Dr. time. Or the thought of her sipping President’s Page 2 Deborah Nucatola, Senior Director her cabernet sauvignon as she brags, May I Send You These Gifts? 4 of Medical Services, Planned “We’ve been very good at getting Manual Vacuum Aspirators 6 Parenthood, describing how her heart, lung, liver.” How the abortionist can manage to Tough Challenges Ahead 8 organization is harvesting and selling parts and pieces from aborted babies.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health
    Clinical Updates in 2020 Reproductive Health Please use and share widely: www.ipas.org/clinicalupdates Also available in Spanish: www.ipas.org/actualizacionesclinicas For more information, email [email protected] © 2020 Ipas. Produced in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Ipas. (2020). Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health. L. Castleman & N. Kapp (Eds.). Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas. Ipas works globally to improve access to safe abortion and contraception so that every woman and girl can determine her own future. Across Africa, Asia and Latin America, we work with partners to make safe abortion and contraception widely available, to connect women with vital information so they can access safe services, and to advocate for safe, legal abortion. Cover photos, left to right: © Ipas; © Richard Lord; © Benjamin Porter Ipas is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All contributions to Ipas are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. For more information or to donate to Ipas: Ipas P.O. Box 9990 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA 1-919-967-7052 www.ipas.org Clinical Updates in 2020 Reproductive Health Medical Editor: Nathalie Kapp Medical Director: Laura Castleman & Nathalie Kapp Lead Writer: Emily Jackson Clinical advisory team: Babatunde Adelekan, Nigeria Sangeeta Batra, India Abiyot Belai, Ethiopia Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Nepal Patrick Djemo, Democratic Republic of Congo Claudia Martinez Lopez, Mexico Guillermo Ortiz, United States Bill Powell, United States ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to those who contributed to this and
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions (The Experience in Portugal As a Continental Civil Law Country)
    Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions (The Experience in Portugal as a Continental Civil Law Country) Vera Lúcia Raposo Abstract This article presents a brief overview of how medical liability for wrongful birth and wrongful life issues is addressed under continental civil law in Portugal. It analyses the requisites for tort liability (wrongfulness, culpability, causation and damage), then explores how these elements operate in wrongful birth and life lawsuits. This is done to determine whether they can be applied as they would be in any other medical liability situation, or whether they require adaption. In addition, this article examines other circumstances that can affect the outcome of these legal procedures, namely standing to file a lawsuit, the judicial consideration of hypothetical events and the legal regulation of abortion. In addition to analysing the particularities of continental civil law within the domain of wrongful birth and life suits, this article will provide some suggestions for improving the current law and caselaw and some insights regarding the development of these legal proceedings for the near future. I. Juridical Contextualisation of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions Wrongful birth actions arise when a child is born with a disease or a malformation and his or her parents (the claimants) want to hold responsible those who professionally advised on the pregnancy without providing complete information on it. The potentially culpable parties include the hospital, the medical team and/or any external laboratory that performed the prenatal diagnostic exam (the defendants), even if they have not caused the birth defect directly.1 Assistant Professor, University of Macau, China, Faculty of Law; Assistant Professor, University of Coimbra, Portugal, Faculty of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro De Ciências Sociais Faculdade De Direito
    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências Sociais Faculdade de Direito Eduardo Aidê Bueno de Camargo O Judiciário e o aborto: como os juízes devem lidar com o desacordo moral razoável no conflito entre direitos fundamentais? Rio de Janeiro 2018 Eduardo Aidê Bueno de Camargo O Judiciário e o aborto: como os juízes devem lidar com o desacordo moral razoável no conflito entre direitos fundamentais? Dissertação apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Área de concentração: Direito Público. Orientadora: Prof.ª Dra. Jane Reis Gonçalves Pereira Rio de Janeiro 2018 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ/REDE SIRIUS/BIBLIOTECA CCS/C C172 Camargo, Eduardo Aidê Bueno de. O judiciário e o aborto: como os juízes devem lidar com o desacordo moral razoável no conflito entre direitos fundamentais / Eduardo Aidê Bueno de Camargo. - 2018. 298 f. Orientador: Profª. Dra. Jane Reis Gonçalves Pereira. Dissertação (Mestrado). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Direito. 1. Direito constitucional - Teses. 2. Direitos fundamentais –Teses. 3.Proporcionalidade (Direito) – Teses. I. Pereira, Jane Reis Gonçalves. II. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Faculdade de Direito. III. Título. CDU 342.7 Bibliotecária: Marcela Rodrigues de Souza CRB7/5906 Autorizo, apenas para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta tese, desde que citada a fonte. _______________________________________ _____________________ Assinatura Data Eduardo Aidê Bueno de Camargo O Judiciário e o aborto: como os juízes devem lidar com o desacordo moral razoável no conflito entre direitos fundamentais? Dissertação apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Medical Abortion in Norway 1998-2013
    ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQRI0HGLFDO$ERUWLRQLQ 1RUZD\ 0HWWH/¡NHODQG Dissertation for the degree philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of Bergen Dissertation date: © Copyright Mette Løkeland The material in this publication is protected by copyright law. Year: 2015 Title: Implementation of Medical Abortion in Norway 1998-2013 Author: Mette Løkeland Print: AIT OSLO AS/University of Bergen 1 Elephant in the Dark Some Hindus have an elephant to show. No one here has ever seen an elephant. They bring it at night to a dark room. One by one, we go in the dark and come out saying how we experience the animal. One of us happens to touch the trunk. “A water-pipe kind of creature.” Another, the ear. “A very strong, always moving back and forth, fan-animal.” Another, the leg. “I find it still, like a column on a temple.” Another touches the curved back. “A leathery throne.” Another, the cleverest, feels the tusk. “A rounded sword made of porcelain.” He’s proud of his description. Each of us touches one place and understands the whole in that way. The palm and the fingers feeling in the dark are how the senses explore the reality of the elephant. If each of us held a candle there, and if we went in together, we could see it. (Rumi, 13th century Iran) 2 Scientific environment This PhD project has been performed at the Department of Clinical Science at the University of Bergen, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen. Professor Line Bjørge has been my main supervisor and Professor Ole-Erik Iversen has been my co-supervisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact of Abortion's Decriminalization in Portugal
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Economics from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics and Maastricht University School of Business and Economics Social Impact of Abortion’s Decriminalization in Portugal* António Melo Nova SBE Number: 842 Maastricht SBE Number: I6123338 A project carried on the Master‚s in Economics Program under the supervision of: Professor Susana Peralta Professor Kristof Bosmans I dedicate this thesis to my dad. Lisbon, 28th May, 2017 *I am deeply grateful to my two advisers, Susana Peralta and Kristof Bosmans for helping me to overcome the challenges this thesis has posed. I would also like to thank the General Health Directorate - Direcção Geral da Saúde and the National Institute of Statistics - Instituto Nacional de Estatística for making available individual data on abortions and births, respectively. Also I would like to give a special thank to the General Health Directorate - Direcção Geral da Saúde for their help in the clarification of questions regarding the abortion reality in Portugal, in particular to Elsa Mota, health senior office of the Division of Infant, Youth, Reproductive and Sexual Health. I would finally like to thank my family for truly being a source of inspiration and support. Abstract This paper studies the impact of legalizing abortion in Portugal on fertility and on maternal-infant health indicators, namely on low birth weight (LBW). It used individual- level data on all pregnancies in Portugal from 2008 to 2014. It retrieved the socio-economic determinants of abortion in Portugal to find that young women, educated, employed, working in low skilled jobs, single, with previous children, without easy access to abortion services and living in conservative regions are more prone to abort.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion in Public International Law and Comparative Perspectives: Approaches and Challenges
    Ciencia Jurídica Universidad de Guanajuato División de Derecho, Política y Gobierno Departamento de Derecho Año 7, núm. 13 P. 7 ABORTION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES: APPROACHES AND CHALLENGES El aborto en el derecho internacional público y la perspectiva comparada: enfoques y retos Dorothy ESTRADA TANCK* Abstract: This article will map and analyze the main trends that public international law, comparative law and transnational perspectives have followed when approaching the issue of abortion. It will examine the way in which the legal argumentation and interpretation is constructed, the approximations and criteria legal scholars, legislators and courts have adopted in selecting the points of comparison, as well as the varied subjects, rights and social values that enter under scrutiny when coping with this matter. It will do so under the main referential framework of international human rights law and doctrine, as an approach through which academic outlooks, legislative positions and practical instances regarding abortion can be studied, considering the universal values and objectives which serve as the foundation of such rights. Keywords: Abortion, international law, comparative perspective, human rights, women’s rights Resumen: En este artículo se realizará una proyección y un análisis de las principales tendencias que el derecho internacional público, el derecho comparado y las perspectivas transnacionales han seguido al abordar el tema del aborto. Examinará la forma en que se construye la argumentación e interpretación jurídica, las aproximaciones y criterios que los juristas, legisladores y tribunales han adoptado al seleccionar los puntos de comparación, así como los variados temas, derechos y valores sociales que entran en escrutinio cuando se hace frente a este asunto.
    [Show full text]
  • RU 486: Is It Really Easier and Safer?
    RESPECT LIFE Overcoming despair with hope RU 486: Is it really easier and safer? At some stage in their lives, just over half WHAT IS RU 486 AND HOW DOES But is RU 486 a panacea for women as of all women experience an unplanned IT WORK? abortion advocates claim, or is it putting pregnancy.1 For many women, their initial women’s lives at risk? Is the potential cost to RU 486 (mifepristone) induces abortion by shock fades and the reality of motherhood women’s health too high for this so-called preventing the continued development of becomes a source of unexpected joy. Sadly the unborn child. It is an artificial steroid solution? for others, continuing with the pregnancy that blocks progesterone, a hormone needed becomes difficult. HOW SAFE IS RU 486 COMPARED to continue a pregnancy. A second drug, TO SURGICAL ABORTION? Anna Romano found herself in this misoprostol, a powerful prostaglandin (PG) situation. Anna thought that she had that causes uterine contractions, is given RU 486/PG abortion is promoted as found the man of her dreams, but upon around 24–48 hours later to expel ‘safe, effective, quick and more natural’. discovering she was pregnant found that he the embryo. Women often have the impression that was married and already had a family of his This combination of RU 486 and they can take a few pills and their pregnancy own. He refused to support her and insisted prostaglandin (RU 486/PG) is referred to will just disappear. They are told they may that she have an abortion.
    [Show full text]