The FIAPAC Newsletter, April 2017 Editorial. Table of Content
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Explaining the Exceptional Behaviour of the Portuguese Church Hierarchy in Morality Politics
Shunning Direct Intervention: Explaining the Exceptional Behaviour of the Portuguese church Hierarchy in Morality Politics by Madalena Meyer Resende (FCSH-UNL and IPRI-UNL) and Anja Hennig (European University Viadrina) Abstract Why are the Catholic churches in most European countries politically active in relevant morality policy issues while the Portuguese hierarchy has remained reserved during mobilizing debates such as abortion and same-sex marriage, whose laws’ recent changes go against Catholic beliefs? The explanation could be institutional, as the fairly recent Portuguese transition to democracy dramatically changed the role attributed to the church by the former regimes. However, in Spain – whose case is similar to Portugal in matters of timing and political conditions – the hierarchy’s behaviour is different. This begs the question: what elements explain the exceptionality of the Portuguese case? This article shows that the Portuguese case illustrates an element usually not emphasized in the literature: the ideological inclination of the church elites. The article thus concludes that institutional access is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for the church to directly intervene in morality policy processes. A church may have access to influence political decision makers but, for ideological reasons, may be unwilling to use it. Keywords: Portugal, morality policy, Catholic church, Vatican Council II, abortion, gay-marriage, ideology, historical institutionalism Introduction the church from the policy-making arena. As we The recent debate in the Portuguese parliament will show, up until 2013, the Portuguese hierar- (July 2015) about restricting the 2007 liberal- chy showed great restraint during the process of ized abortion law in Portugal revealed a novum moral-political liberalization. -
Conscientious Objection to the Provision of Reproductive Healthcare
Volume 123, Supplement 3 (2013) Amsterdam • Boston • London • New York • Oxford • Paris • Philadelphia • San Diego • St. Louis International Journal of GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS Editor: T. Johnson (USA) Editor Emeritus: J. Sciarra (USA) Associate Editor: W. Holzgreve (Germany) P. Serafini (Brazil) J. Fortney (USA) Associate Editor Emeritus: L. Keith (USA) Managing Editor: C. Addington (UK) Manuscript Editor: P. Chapman (UK) Honorary Associate Editor: L. Hamberger (Sweden) Associate Editors Ethical and Legal Issues R. Cook (Canada) in Reproductive Health: B. Dickens (Canada) Enabling Technologies: M. Hammoud (USA) FIGO Staging of Gynecologic Cancer: L. Denny (South Africa) Contemporary Issues in R. Adanu (Ghana) Women’s Health: V. Boama (South Africa) V. Guinto (Philippines) C. Sosa (Uruguay) Statistical Consultant: A. Vahratian (USA) Editorial Office: FIGO Secretariat, FIGO House Suite 3 - Waterloo Court, 10 Theed Street, London, SE1 8ST, UK Tel: +44 20 7928 1166 Fax: +44 20 7928 7099 E-mail: [email protected] Supplement to International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Volume 123, Supplement 3 Conscientious objection to the provision of reproductive healthcare Guest Editor: Wendy Chavkin MD, MPH Publication of this supplement was made possible with support from Ford Foundation and an anonymous donor. We thank all Global Doctors for Choice funders for making the project possible. © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved. 0020-7292/06/$32.00 This journal and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and the following terms and conditions apply to their use: Photocopying Single photocopies of single articles may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. -
Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries
Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries Country Report For France Nathalie Bajos Sandrine Durand Occasional Report No. 5 November 2001 Acknowledgments This report is part of The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s cross-national study, Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries, conducted with the support of The Ford Foundation and The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The Country Report for France was written by Nathalie Bajos and Sandrine Durand of Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM). Review of the manuscript, copy-editing and formatting were provided by AGI staff. Other publications in the series, Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries include country reports for Canada, Great Britain, Sweden and The United States, a report that summarizes and compares the five countries: Can more Progress be Made? And an executive summary of this report. Suggested citation: Bajos N and Durand S, Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries: Country Report for France, Occasional Report, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 2001, No. 5. For more information and to order these reports, go to www.guttmacher.org. © 2001, The Alan Guttmacher Institute, A Not-for- Profit Corporation for Reproductive Health Research, Policy Analysis and Public Education Table of Contents Part I. Levels and Trends in Adolescent Sexual Details of French Social Welfare Policies……....33 and Reproductive Behavior……………………….5 Interventions or Programs that Assist Youth From Birthrates and Abortion Rates…………………...5 Disadvantaged Populations…...……………..39 Sexual Activity and Contraceptive Use………….6 STDs and HIV/AIDS………………………….…9 Part V. Hypotheses Suggested by Various Summary…………………………………………9 Researchers to Explain Adolescent Pregnancy in France..…….………………………………..…….42 Part II. -
Liberating Women - Removing Barriers and Increasing Access to Safe Abortion Care”
th THE 13 FIAPAC CONFERENCE “Liberating women - removing barriers and increasing access to safe abortion care” Nantes, France La Cité, Nantes Events Center 14-15 September 2018 www.fiapac.org FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DES ASSOCIES PROFESSIONNELS DE L'AVORTEMENT ET DE LA CONTRACEPTION INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL ABORTION AND CONTRACEPTION ASSOCIATES 14.-15. September 2018, Nantes, France CONTACT AND ORGANISATION PRACTICAL INFORMATION CONFERENCE VENUE REGISTRATION DESK La Cité, Nantes Events Center Please ensure that you bring identification (credit card 5 rue de Valmy or passport or ID card etc) to obtain your registration BP 24102 pack. 44041 Nantes cedex 1 > Friday, 14 September, 08:00 - 17:00 France > Saturday, 15 September, 07:45 - 17:00 https://lacite-nantes.com/ BADGES CONFERENCE SECRETARIAT Conference badges should be worn by all participants FIAPAC Congress Secretariat at all times during the conference and while visiting p/a Orga-Med Congress Office bvba the exhibition area. No badge, no entry. Opalfeneweg 3 CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE 1740 Ternat A certificate of attendance will be delivered together Belgium with your badge upon arrival. Tel. +32 2 582 08 52 [email protected] LUNCH www.fiapac.org Lunch will be provided for all participants on Friday 14 September and Saturday 15 September. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE • Aubény, E. (France) GENERAL ASSEMBLY • Cameron, S. (UK) (FIAPAC President) Paid-up members are invited to attend the General Assembly • David, Ph. (France) (Auditorium 450) Friday 14 September, 18:00 - 19:30. • Faucher, Ph. (France) LANGUAGE • Fiala, C. (Austria) The congress language is English. Simultaneous • Gemzell Danielsson, K. (Sweden) translation into French will be provided for all • Johnson, R. -
Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health
APRIL 2019 Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health Please use and share widely: www.ipas.org/clinicalupdates Also available in Spanish: www.ipas.org/actualizacionesclinicas For more information, email [email protected] CURH-E19 April 2019 © 2019 Ipas. Produced in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Ipas. (2019). Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health. L. Castleman & N. Kapp (Eds.). Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas. Ipas works globally to improve access to safe abortion and contraception so that every woman and girl can determine her own future. Across Africa, Asia and Latin America, we work with partners to make safe abortion and contraception widely available, to connect women with vital information so they can access safe services, and to advocate for safe, legal abortion. Cover photos, left to right: © Ipas; © Richard Lord; © Benjamin Porter Ipas is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All contributions to Ipas are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. For more information or to donate to Ipas: Ipas P.O. Box 9990 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA 1-919-967-7052 www.ipas.org APRIL 2019 Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health Medical Editor: Nathalie Kapp Medical Director: Laura Castleman Lead Writer: Emily Jackson Clinical advisory team: Sangeeta Batra, India Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Nepal Abiyot Belai, Ethiopia Steve Luboya, Zambia Guillermo Ortiz, United States Claudia Martinez Lopez, Mexico Bill Powell, United States ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to those who contributed to this and previous versions of Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health: Rebecca Allen Lynn Borgatta Dalia Brahmi Anne Burke Catherine Casino Talemoh Dah Gillian Dean Alison Edelman Courtney Firestine Mary Fjerstad Bela Ganatra Vinita Goyal Joan Healy Bliss Kaneshiro Ann Leonard Radha Lewis Patricia Lohr Alice Mark (Founding Editor) Lisa Memmel Karen Padilla Regina Renner Cristião Rosas Laura Schoedler Clinical Updates topics are determined through queries gathered from Ipas-supported train- ings and programs in the public and private health sectors. -
ICPD and HUMAN RIGHTS: 20 Years of Advancing Reproductive Rights Through UN Treaty Bodies and Legal Reform INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION (Continued)
ICPD AND HUMAN RIGHTS: 20 years of advancing reproductive rights through UN treaty bodies and legal reform INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION (continued) International Conference on Population and Development Fact Sheets address the issue, the evolving human rights standards, and examples of laws, policies, and judicial decisions aimed to effectuate these particular rights. Finally, the fact sheets provide a select number of recommendations for overcoming barriers In 1994, at the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), 179 countries came together and adopted a to realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights. Programme of Action, in which they agreed that population policies must be aimed at empowering couples and individuals— especially women—to make decisions about the size of their families, providing them with the information and resources to While many bodies contribute to the development of human rights standards, including the UN Human Rights Council, UN make such decisions, and enabling them to exercise their reproductive rights. For the first time in an international consensus agencies, and specialized experts appointed by the UN, the human rights standards set forth in these fact sheets are those document, states agreed that reproductive rights are human rights that are already recognized in domestic and international established by treaty monitoring bodies, as they are charged with providing authoritative interpretations of the rights enshrined law. in their respective treaties to which state parties are legally bound to comply. While regional human rights bodies and agreements have made tremendous contributions to the advancement of sexual and reproductive health and rights, they are The ICPD Programme of Action recognizes that realizing the right to reproductive health is a critical element of guaranteeing not included in these fact sheets. -
Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies
This is a repository copy of Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies. Book Review. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/98822/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Krajewska, A. orcid.org/0000-0001-9096-1056 (2016) Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies. Book Review. Medical Law Review, 24 (2). pp. 290-296. ISSN 0967-0742 https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv041 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Abortion Laws in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies REBECCA J COOK, JOANNA N ERDMAN, BERNARD M DICKENS (eds.) Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014, 480 pp., hardback, £45.50, 9780812246278 Atina Krajewska, Sheffield Law School, University of Sheffield, England, [email protected] For a while at least, it seemed that proponents and opponents of decriminalisation and liberalisation of abortion laws had become entrenched in their well-known positions and that national legislators and politicians had reached a form of, usually fragile, consensus. -
Stop Abortion.” If Adopted, This Legislation Will Further Limit the Already Restricted Grounds on Which Women Can Lawfully Access Abortion in Poland
Polish Parliament Must Protect Women’s Health and Rights 22 March 2018 We are deeply concerned by relentless attempts to roll back the reproductive rights of women in Poland. This week Poland’s parliament is debating a new draft bill entitled “Stop Abortion.” If adopted, this legislation will further limit the already restricted grounds on which women can lawfully access abortion in Poland. It will place women’s health and lives at risk and violate Poland’s international human rights obligations. We call on Members of Poland’s Parliament to listen to the voices of women across Poland and to reject this regressive legislative proposal and protect women’s health and human rights. Poland already has one of Europe’s most restrictive abortion laws. Abortion is only lawful to safeguard the life or health of women, in situations of severe fetal anomaly or where the pregnancy results from rape or another criminal act such as incest. Even in those situations in which abortion is legal, multiple barriers combine to limit women’s access in practice. The latest “Stop Abortion” proposal seeks to ban abortion in situations where there is a severe fetal anomaly. If the “Stop Abortion” bill is passed it will mean that abortion care will no longer be available to women in Poland when they receive a diagnosis of a severe or fatal fetal anomaly. Official statistics from 2016 show that in practice 96% of legal abortions in Poland are performed on these grounds. Most women in Poland who decide to end a pregnancy resulting from rape or because their health is at risk are unable to access legal abortion care in Poland and must travel outside the country to do so. -
Fetal Cannibalism Planned Parenthood Style in China They Eat Babies; Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs
Volume 25, Number 5 September-October 2015 A review and analysis of worldwide population control activity Fetal Cannibalism Planned Parenthood Style In China they eat babies; Planned Parenthood kills them and then sells their organs. Which is worse? By Steven Mosher and Jonathan Abbamonte On the menu of some exclusive Chinese restaurants is an item that goes by the name of Spare Rib Soup. Very expensive, it is usually served only in the back rooms to known customers, who are willing to pay to premium for this delicacy. So what is Spare Rib Soup? Brace yourselves. Spare Rib Soup is actually a human soup, made from the bodies of aborted babies. It is regarded by the Chinese—at least some Chinese—as a rejuvenating potion. A kind of fountain of youth that will fix sagging wrinkles, grow back missing hair, and generally put a spring back in your step. Shutterstock All of which is quite simply discusses the importance of not nonsense. crushing the organs so she “can get INSIDE THIS ISSUE But I thought of Spare Rib Soup it all intact” will stay with you a long Fetal Cannibalism 1 when I watched the video of Dr. time. Or the thought of her sipping President’s Page 2 Deborah Nucatola, Senior Director her cabernet sauvignon as she brags, May I Send You These Gifts? 4 of Medical Services, Planned “We’ve been very good at getting Manual Vacuum Aspirators 6 Parenthood, describing how her heart, lung, liver.” How the abortionist can manage to Tough Challenges Ahead 8 organization is harvesting and selling parts and pieces from aborted babies. -
Elective Abortion: Clinical Practice Guidelines from the French College
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 222 (2018) 95–101 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejogrb Review article Elective abortion: Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) a,b, c c c Christophe Vayssière *, Adrien Gaudineau , Luisa Attali , Karima Bettahar , d e f g Sophie Eyraud , Philippe Faucher , Patrick Fournet , Danielle Hassoun , h i j k l Marie Hatchuel , Christian Jamin , Brigitte Letombe , Teddy Linet , Marie Msika Razon , m n o,p q Alexandra Ohanessian , Hélène Segain , Solène Vigoureux , Norbert Winer , q m Sophie Wylomanski , Aubert Agostini a Pôle Femme-Mère-Couple, service de gynecologie-obstétrique, Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France b UMR 1027 INSERM, Université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France c Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de Hautepierre, CHU de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France d 3 rue Pierre d’Artagnan, 92350 Le Plessis-Robinson, France e Unité fonctionnelle d’orthogénie, Hôpital Trousseau, 26 Avenue du Dr Arnold Netter, 75012 Paris, France f Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier du Belvedere 72, rue Louis Pasteur, 76451 Mont Saint Aignan, France g 5 place Léon Blum, 75011 Paris, France h 4 rue Lasson, 75012 Paris, France i 169 boulevard Haussmann, 75008 Paris, France j Service de Gynécologoe-Obstétrique, Hôpital Jeanne -
Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health
Clinical Updates in 2020 Reproductive Health Please use and share widely: www.ipas.org/clinicalupdates Also available in Spanish: www.ipas.org/actualizacionesclinicas For more information, email [email protected] © 2020 Ipas. Produced in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Ipas. (2020). Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health. L. Castleman & N. Kapp (Eds.). Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas. Ipas works globally to improve access to safe abortion and contraception so that every woman and girl can determine her own future. Across Africa, Asia and Latin America, we work with partners to make safe abortion and contraception widely available, to connect women with vital information so they can access safe services, and to advocate for safe, legal abortion. Cover photos, left to right: © Ipas; © Richard Lord; © Benjamin Porter Ipas is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All contributions to Ipas are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. For more information or to donate to Ipas: Ipas P.O. Box 9990 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA 1-919-967-7052 www.ipas.org Clinical Updates in 2020 Reproductive Health Medical Editor: Nathalie Kapp Medical Director: Laura Castleman & Nathalie Kapp Lead Writer: Emily Jackson Clinical advisory team: Babatunde Adelekan, Nigeria Sangeeta Batra, India Abiyot Belai, Ethiopia Deeb Shrestha Dangol, Nepal Patrick Djemo, Democratic Republic of Congo Claudia Martinez Lopez, Mexico Guillermo Ortiz, United States Bill Powell, United States ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to those who contributed to this and -
Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions (The Experience in Portugal As a Continental Civil Law Country)
Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions (The Experience in Portugal as a Continental Civil Law Country) Vera Lúcia Raposo Abstract This article presents a brief overview of how medical liability for wrongful birth and wrongful life issues is addressed under continental civil law in Portugal. It analyses the requisites for tort liability (wrongfulness, culpability, causation and damage), then explores how these elements operate in wrongful birth and life lawsuits. This is done to determine whether they can be applied as they would be in any other medical liability situation, or whether they require adaption. In addition, this article examines other circumstances that can affect the outcome of these legal procedures, namely standing to file a lawsuit, the judicial consideration of hypothetical events and the legal regulation of abortion. In addition to analysing the particularities of continental civil law within the domain of wrongful birth and life suits, this article will provide some suggestions for improving the current law and caselaw and some insights regarding the development of these legal proceedings for the near future. I. Juridical Contextualisation of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions Wrongful birth actions arise when a child is born with a disease or a malformation and his or her parents (the claimants) want to hold responsible those who professionally advised on the pregnancy without providing complete information on it. The potentially culpable parties include the hospital, the medical team and/or any external laboratory that performed the prenatal diagnostic exam (the defendants), even if they have not caused the birth defect directly.1 Assistant Professor, University of Macau, China, Faculty of Law; Assistant Professor, University of Coimbra, Portugal, Faculty of Law.