Climate Science Stirs up a Storm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Science Stirs up a Storm The newspaper of the physics community July 2007 CONTENTS Climate science stirs up a storm 2 News ● New report on nanoscience ● MODEL practicals appeal to Heather Pinnell reports on a heated debate about global warming, hosted by the Institute. teachers ● Project Juno takes In the same week that the G8 leaders represent the climate during the off ● Queen’s Birthday were discussing climate change and 20th century as it should have been Honours ● Famelab winner is ● agreeing to talk about cutting CO2 according to the models, and compared a physicist Annual emissions, a large audience packed these with actual observations. These Representatives Meeting into the Institute’s London centre to showed that the models simulated real- discusses university places hear expert opinion and discussion ity very well, he said. Similarly, predic- on the models used to understand cli- tions had been made since 1990 using 5 People mate change. On 7 June, MP and for- the models and these had predicted the How Haley Gomez became a mer environment minister Michael state of the climate during the last rising star in physics Meacher chaired a seminar with 17 years very well, but if anything had prominent speakers from both sides underestimated the degree of warming. of the climate change debate, while a A panel discussion followed, with week later there was standing-room Lindzen and Thorpe joined on the only when Prof. Jonathan Gregory, panel by astrophysicist Piers Corbyn one of the lead authors of the and Prof. Chris Rapley, director of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate British Antarctic Survey. Lindzen was Change (IPCC) report, presented evi- challenged on his statement that the dence on global warming. effects of aerosols were “virtually Opening the first seminar, Meacher unknown”. Keith Shine, from Reading 6 Letters said that 10 years ago the issue was University’s meteorology depart- Defending enhancement ● hardly on the radar screen; now there ment, said: “To claim this now in 2007 courses Culture shock in were almost daily reports about cli- virtually beggars belief. There have schools ● Have your say on mate change, including runaway been dozens of field campaigns as nuclear power melting of the arctic sea ice, massive well as collection of satellite data. methane releases in Siberia and There’s a very large body of evidence 7 Event horizon Alaska and dramatic hurricanes. It that aerosols reflect heat back to space What’s on in physics had been suggested that global warm- and contribute to cooling.” Lindzen ing could create 50 million environ- maintained, however, that their global 8 Antimatters mental refugees, while the Pentagon impact was unknown. Observing a new planetarium considers climate change to be a In a meeting organised jointly by greater risk than global terrorism, he the Institute’s Environmental Physics said. “The argument is that increasing Group and its London and South-East CO2 levels are responsible for rising Branch, an audience of more than global temperatures. The question is 170 people again packed into the whether that is correct.” Institute on 13 June. They had come to Though there is an almost universal NASA/Goddard Space Centre hear Prof. Gregory lecture on the consensus that the world is warming Iceland’s Breidamerkurjokull glacier in 1997 (top) and 2000 (bottom). considerable evidence for human- up, some scientists still question induced global warming, for which whether CO2 emissions are causing the warming in the oceans had not yet the IPCC had said there was a 90% “I found a section on change. Prof. Richard Lindzen, an been felt globally were exaggerated. probability. The IPCC did not conduct atmospheric scientist from the Massa- “Ten years ago the Lindzen said that each chain in the new research but assessed the existing black holes, which I chusetts Institute of Technology, is one argument for human-induced global literature, he explained. of them. Addressing the seminar, he issue was hardly on warming was tenuous, leading to an Despite some limitations, the cli- decided to read discussed the main areas of contro- infinitesimally small chance that it mate models were reliable, he said. versy, which concern the uncertainties the radar screen; was the correct model. Like believers There was thermal inertia in the sys- because it looked in the data, the effect of both negative in intelligent design, he said, those tem because it took a long time for the scary.” and positive feedbacks and the sensi- now there are daily who believed in it did so because they oceans to heat up, so there was a pre- Haley Gomez, p5 tivity of the climate to rising CO2 levels. reports about could discover no alternative expla- dicted temperature rise that would lag He went further, however, arguing that nation. “When politics enters the pic- decades behind the corresponding the models are fundamentally wrong climate change.” ture, science takes a back seat, even rise in CO2 levels. Ice core evidence “A scientist appears, and do not take sufficient account of among scientists,” he said. showed that the atmosphere had been the warming in the tropical tropo- Prof. Alan Thorpe, a distinguished little changed for the last 10 000 years, to congratulate them sphere rather than at the surface. Based meteorologist and chief executive of then since about 1750 the levels of or to tell them where on this, he said, no more than about a the Natural Environment Research CO2 shot up and we could be confi- third of the Earth’s surface warming Council, presented substantial evi- dent that this came from fossil fuel they went wrong.” could be due to the greenhouse effect. dence to support the opposing view. burning and deforestation. Heather Pinnell, p8 It was claimed, he said, that dou- He agreed that there were significant He also presented evidence of sea- bling CO2 should lead to about 1.5 C to uncertainties in certain aspects of the level rise, more severe and longer 4.5 C warming. However, we were models, particularly the effects of droughts in the last 30 years and rapid already 86% of the way to a doubling of clouds, but there was no reason to thinning of the arctic ice sheet, as well SIGN UP FOR CO2 levels but have seen only 0.6–0.8 C suppose that the models had a sys- as glacial retreat. Asked by Interactions warming at the surface, he argued. He tematic bias towards human-induced to comment on Lindzen’s arguments, YOUR PHYSMAIL did not believe that aerosols, such as global warming, he said. Gregory said that his views stood out sulphate pollutants in the atmosphere, He described the close correlation as exceptional within the scientific E-MAIL ADDRESS had counteracted much of the warm- between rising CO2 levels and global community. “The scientific literature ing and said that suggestions that there temperatures over the last 100 years. is overwhelmingly saying that CO2 is members.iop.org was a long time delay as the effect of Scientists had created “hindcasts” to causing climactic warming,” he said. Interactions July 2007 2 news HIGHLIGHTS Physics buskers take experiments far afield Nanoscience looks to the future A team of physics “buskers” from the Institute performed tricks to engage visitors at the East Nanoscience could provide huge ben- the same constituents in a bulk mate- elements of a DNA computer. of England County Show on 15–17 June. Their efits to society but further research is rial because of their much larger sur- Researchers are already integrating needed into any problems that could face-area-to-volume ratio. This leads enzymes with metal and organic demonstrations included making balloon arise from the use of nanoparticles, to increased chemical reactivity which nanostructures to build devices to act kebabs and launching Alka Seltzer rockets according to a report published jointly means nanoparticles can make good as biomedical motors. during the event in Peterborough. The aim was to take physics to by the Institute and the Royal Society catalysts. The emergence of quantum The booklet says that governments people who would not actively seek it out, according to the of Chemistry, The Future for Nanoscience effects at the nanoscale means nano- around the world should work with Institute’s physics in society manager, Caitlin Watson. The activity and Nanotechnology. It explains some of materials can be used as the basis for industry and the research communi- attracted a lot of attention at the show from both adults and the ways in which nanoscience is lead- quantum dots, with applications in ties to establish global protocols for children, and people were shown how they could perform the same ing to new materials and technologies data-reading devices and potentially as testing the safety of nanotechnologi- and its potential applications. the elements of quantum computers. cal products. Nanoparticles are highly tricks in front of family and friends. The event was the first in a The booklet says that nanotechnol- It is inevitable that developments in reactive and may be able to traverse number of Physics in the Field demonstrations – the team is set to ogy is likely to affect every industry technology will tend towards increas- cell membranes, it notes, although no perform at the Bradford Mela (7–8 July), the Highland Games in eventually and it is predicted that ing miniaturisation, the report says. clinical toxicity has been reported in Inverness (21–22 July) and the Green Man Festival in the Brecon products made using nanotechnolog- This will probably involve integration humans. There is a need for further Beacons, Wales (17–19 August) . ical processes will account for 15% of of chemical and biologically-based research into these possible effects and global manufacturing output by 2014.
Recommended publications
  • ISIS Annual Review 2012
    Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source Review of the Year 2012 ISIS 2012 ISIS 2012 was produced for the ISIS Facility, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK ISIS Director, Prof Robert McGreevy 01235 445599 ISIS User Office 01235 445592 ISIS Facility Web pages http://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk ISIS 2012 production team: David Clements, Felix Fernandez-Alonso, Hanna Fikremariam, Tatiana Guidi, Philip King, Anders Markvardsen, Stewart Parker, Rob Washington. Design and layout: Ampersand Design Ltd, Wantage. September 2012 © Science and Technology Facilities Council 2012 Enquiries about copyright, reproduction and requests for additional copies of this report should be addressed to: STFC Library and Information Services, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX email: [email protected] Neither the Council nor the Laboratory accept any responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of information contained in any of their reports or in any communication about their tests or investigations. ISIS PULSED NEUTRON AND MUON SOURCE ISIS 2012 ISIS provides world-class facilities for neutron and muon investigations of materials across a diverse range of science disciplines. ISIS 2012 details the work of the facility over the past year, including accounts of science highlights, descriptions of major instrument and accelerator developments and the facility’s publications for the past year. CONTENTS 3 Foreword 6 Science highlights 8 Soft Matter and Biomolecular
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Template (Double-Sided)
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY Yiarayong Klangboonkrong Modes of knowledge production: Articulating coexistence in UK academic science School of Management PhD Academic Year: 2014-2015 Supervisor: Professor Mark Jenkins July 2015 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY School of Management PhD Thesis Academic Year 2014-2015 Yiarayong Klangboonkrong Modes of knowledge production: Articulating coexistence in UK academic science Supervisor: Professor Mark Jenkins July 2015 © Cranfield University 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. ABSTRACT The notion of Mode 2, as a shift from Mode 1 science-as-we-know-it, depicts science as practically relevant, socially distributed and democratic. Debates remain over the empirical substantiation of Mode 2. In particular, our understanding has been impeded by the mutually exclusive framing of Mode 1/Mode 2. Looking at how academic science is justified to diverse institutional interests – a situation associated with Mode 2 – it is asked, “What happens to Mode 1 where Mode 2 is in demand?” This study comprises two sequential phases. It combines interviews with 18 university spinout founders as micro-level Mode 2 exemplars, and macro-level policy narratives from 72 expert witnesses examined by select committees. An interpretive scheme (Greenwood and Hinings, 1988) is applied to capture the internal means-ends structure of each mode, where the end is to satisfy demand constituents, both in academia (Mode 1) and beyond (Mode 2). Results indicate Mode 1’s enduring influence even where non-academic demands are concerned, thus refuting that means and ends necessarily operate together as a stable mode. The causal ambiguity inherent in scientific advances necessitates (i) Mode 1 peer review as the only quality control regime systematically applicable ex ante, and (ii) Mode 1 means of knowledge production as essential for the health and diversity of the science base.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Annual Report and Accounts 2010-2011
    Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRCANNUAL EPSRCREPORT AND EPSRC ACCOUNTS EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC2010 -EPSRC 2011 EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC EPSRC ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2010-2011 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Science and Technology Act 1965 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 24 November 2011 HC 1614 London: The Stationery Office £20.50 © Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected]. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Sciences Research
    sip SPRING 2013 4/2/13 12:22 Page 1 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT Chemical engineering – a vital part of the 21st Century jigsaw sip SPRING 2013 The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee www.scienceinparliament.org.uk sip SPRING 2013 4/2/13 12:22 Page 2 Source: Deloitte The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council The Council for the Mathematical Sciences (CMS) (EPSRC) is the UK’s main agency for funding research in provides an authoritative and objective body that exists to engineering and physical sciences. EPSRC invests around develop, influence and respond to UK policy issues that £800 million a year in research and postgraduate training, affect the mathematical sciences in higher education and to help the nation handle the next generation of research, and therefore the UK economy and society in technological change. The areas covered range from general. Speaking with one voice for five learned information technology to structural engineering, and societies, the CMS represents the Institute of mathematics to materials science. This research forms the Mathematics and its Applications, the London basis for future economic development in the UK and Mathematical Society, the Royal Statistical Society, the improvements for everyone’s health, lifestyle and culture. Edinburgh Mathematical Society and the Operational EPSRC works alongside other Research Councils, working Research Society. collectively on issues of common concern via Research Councils UK. The full report is available at http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/reports/DeloitteMeasuringTheEconomicsBenefits OfMathematicalScienceResearchUKNov2012.pdf sip SPRING 2013 4/2/13 12:22 Page 3 Surely nobody can have failed to notice that “Science” is SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT everywhere these days? We had (Sir) Tim Berners Lee to help open the Olympics.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Paper for Tue 5 Jun 2018
    Tuesday 5 June 2018 Order Paper No.144: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: Justice 12.30pm Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: DiGeorge Syndrome (Review and National Health Service Duty) (David Duguid) Up to three hours Emergency Debate: Sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 Until 7.00pm Non-Domestic Rating (Nursery Grounds) Bill: Second Reading Followed by Motion without separate debate: Programme Until 7.00pm General Debate: NATO No debate Statutory Instruments (Motions for approval) No debate after Digital Economy, Registration Service and Statistics and 7.00pm Registration (Motion) No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: Future of Princess Alexandra Hospital in half an hour Harlow (Robert Halfon) WESTMINSTER HALL 9.30am Polish anti-defamation law 11.00am Potholes and road maintenance (The sitting will be suspended from 11.30am to 2.30pm.) 2.30pm Public sector pay policy 4.00pm Conflict in South Sudan 4.30pm Proposed road alterations around Stonehenge 2 Tuesday 5 June 2018 OP No.144: Part 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 8 Westminster Hall 9 Written Statements 10 Committees meeting today 14 Committee reports published today 15 Announcements 16 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 18 A. Calendar of Business 41 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest. Tuesday 5 June 2018 OP No.144: Part 1 BUSINESS Today: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Followed by QUESTIONS Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Justice 1 Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) What assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing a prison service parliamentary scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Pages
    The Parliamentary and Scientific Committee Annual Report 2010 THE PARLIAMENTARY AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE (An Associate Parliamentary Group including Members of the Associate Parliamentary Engineering Group) Established 1939 The Parliamentary and Scientific Committee is a primary focus for scientific and technological issues providing a long-term liaison between Parliamentarians and scientific and engineering bodies, science-based industry, academia and organisations representing those significantly affected by science. The main aim is to focus on those issues where science and politics meet, informing Members of both Houses of Parliament by indicating the relevance of scientific and technological developments to matters of public interest and to the development of policy. The Committee meets once a month when Parliament is sitting to debate a scientific or engineering topic and its relationship with political issues. These debates take place in the Palace of Westminster, starting at 5.30pm and are usually followed by informal receptions. Attendance is typically 60 –80. Most debates are followed by a working dinner where the informal atmosphere facilitates open and wide-ranging discussion between interested Parliamentarians and those most closely concerned with the evening’s topic. The Committee arranges visits to industrial and scientific establishments. Typically a party of a dozen or so will include two or three Parliamentarians who will thereby have an in-depth introduction to some aspect of the real world of science and technology. Cover photograph Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament. Foreword by the President The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding The President’s Foreword to the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee Annual Report is an opportunity to reflect upon current issues and future opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review Annex 2019-2020
    Annex to the Annual Review 2019| 2020 2 Contents Fellows elected in 2019 . 2 Frontiers of Development seed funding grants . 36 International Fellows . 2 Leaders in Innovation Fellowships . 38 Honorary Fellow . .2 Global Challenges Research Fund Africa Catalyst . 44 Fellows . .2 Higher Education Partnerships in sub-Saharan Trustee Board . 4 Africa . 44 Academy Governance Committees . 5 Africa Prize for Engineering Innovation . 48 Academy Operating Committees . 8 Africa Prize for Engineering Innovation alumni grants programme 2019–2020 . 49 Awards 2019 . 11 Africa Prize: service delivery . 49 Grants, fellowships and programmes . .13 . Africa Prize: travel and training scheme . .49 Research Chairs . 13 Africa Prize: business grants . 50 Chairs in Emerging Technologies. .16 Engineering X . 50 Senior Research Fellowships . .17 Safer Complex Systems . .50 Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowships . .18 Safer End of Engineered Life . .51 Daphne Jackson Trust Fellowships. .18 Engineering Skills where they are most needed . 51 Research Fellowships . 19 Transforming Systems through Partnership . 53 Engineering for Development Research UK-China Urban Flooding Research Impact Fellowships . 22 programme . 58 Associate Research Fellowships. 22 Distinguished Visiting Fellowships and Missions UK Intelligence Community Postdoctoral in Turkey . 59 Research Fellowships . 23 Distinguished Visiting Fellowships . 60 Lloyd’s Register Foundation Research Global Grand Challenges Summit 2019 Fellowships . 23 Follow-up Programmes . 61 Industrial Fellowships Scheme . 24 Ingenious public engagement awards . 62 APEX awards . 26 Engineering Leaders Scholarships . 63 Regional Engagement Awards . 27 Visiting Professors. 67 Proof of Concept Awards . 27 Sainsbury Management Fellowships . 69 Enterprise Fellowships . 28 Connecting STEM teachers programme . 69 IRT Enterprise Fellowships . 28 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering . 71 . ERA Award. 28 Panel of judges.
    [Show full text]
  • RCUK REVIEW of E-SCIENCE in the UNITED KINGDOM
    RCUK Review of e-Science 2009 Section 1 Information for the Panel Overview: Funding of Science and Innovation in the UK RCUK REVIEW OF e-SCIENCE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM EVIDENCE TO THE PANEL NOVEMBER 2009 Research Councils UK (RCUK) Polaris House, North Star Avenue Swindon, SN2 1ET Wiltshire, UK http://www.rcuk.ac.uk RCUK Review of e-Science 2009 Section 1 Information for the Panel Overview: Funding of Science and Innovation in the UK Contents 1. Preface and Summary 1.1 Table of acronyms 1.2 Review of e-Science evidence framework 2. Current UK Science and Innovation Policy and Research Funding Overview 2.1 Setting the scene 2.2 How funding for science is secured 2.3 Funding for research 3. An Introduction to e-Science Research in the UK 3.1 Overview 3.2 Background and introduction 3.3 Funding for e-Science research in the UK 3.4 Bibliometric evidence 3.5 International engagement 3.6 Support for people 3.7 Knowledge Transfer 3.8 Further related funding 4. The Institution Perspective 4.1 Invited institutions evidence 4.2 Other institutes evidence RCUK Review of e-Science 2009 Section 1 Information for the Panel Overview: Funding of Science and Innovation in the UK 1. Preface and Summary This document has been produced in preparation for the 2009 RCUK Review of e-Science. The review is being organised by EPSRC, on behalf of RCUK and aims to inform stakeholders about the quality and impact of the UK science base. The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of research in e-Science in the UK in terms of its people, funding, organisation and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of Mathematics
    International Review of Mathematical Sciences 5 –10 December 2010 Contents Executive Summary iv Table of Acronyms v Acknowledgements vi Foreword vii 1. Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Purpose and scope of the review 1 1.2 Structure of the review 1 1.3 Review Panel activities 2 1.4 Relevant external events 3 1.5 Evidence used by the Panel 3 1.5.1 Data used by the Panel 3 1.5.2 Evidence provided by site visits and panel members’ expertise 4 1.6 Overview of the Panel’s report 4 1.7 On names of individuals and lists of institutions 5 1.8 The International Panel 5 2. Findings and Recommendations 6 2.1 Findings 6 2.2 Broad recommendations 6 2.3 Field-specific recommendations – challenges and opportunities 7 3. Nature of the Mathematical Sciences 10 3.1 Unity 10 3.2 Abstraction and long time scales 10 3.3 Community structure and research needs 12 4. Excellence and Capability through Diversity 13 International Review of Mathematical Science i Contents 5. Subfields of the Mathematical Sciences 15 5.1 Algebra 15 5.2 Analysis 16 5.3 Combinatorics and discrete mathematics 17 5.4 Dynamical systems and complexity 17 5.5 Fluid mechanics 18 5.6 Geometry and topology 19 5.7 Logic and foundations 20 5.8 Mathematical physics 20 5.9 Number theory 21 5.10 Numerical analysis/scientific computing 21 5.11 Operational research 22 5.12 Probability 23 5.13 Statistics 24 6. Applications Connected with the Mathematical Sciences 26 6.1 Computational science and engineering 26 6.2 Financial mathematics 27 6.3 Materials science and engineering 27 6.4 Mathematical biology and medicine 28 7.
    [Show full text]
  • KAVLI INSTITUTE for COSMOLOGY UNIVERSITY of CAMBRIDGE Professor George Efstathiou FRS, Director KICC
    KAVLI INSTITUTE FOR COSMOLOGY UNIVERSITY Of CAMBRIDGE Professor George Efstathiou FRS, Director KICC MADINGLEY ROAD • CAMBRIDGE CB3 0HA • U.K. Professor Adrian Smith FRS, Telephone: +44 (0)1233 337530 BIS, Secretary: +44 (0)1223 337516 1 Victoria Street, email: [email protected] London, SW1H 0ET. July 19, 2010 Dear Professor Smith, Earlier this month a group of senior academics, including myself, submitted a petition to Professor Michael Sterling signed by nearly 1000 scientists expressing a loss of confidence in the CEO of STFC. In fact, there was widespread loss of confidence in STFC in 2008. However, the academic community did not express this in the form of a petition in the hope that the Wakeham Review and the RCUK Structural Review of STFC would lead to changes that might help to restore some confidence. Our group has met with Professor Sterling twice and we have had some constructive discus- sions. However, we have reached an impasse on aspects of the governance of STFC, particularly on the composition of STFC Council, which I believe is a critical issue. The composition of STFC Council is radically different to the composition of the other Research Councils. The composition of STFC Council was flagged as a major issue in the 2008 Science and Technology Select Committee Report and by the Wakeham Review. I quote from the Wakeham review: ‘The Panel was immediately drawn to the different governance structure that exists in STFC in comparison with other Research Councils, notably a reduced Council membership of 10 individuals, four of whom are not university-based academics, and a further three of whom are from the STFC executive.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2008
    THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER No. 367 February 2008 Society MATHEMATICS POLICY ROUND-UP Meetings In early January, Makhan Singh highly beneficial, and that the and Events took up his post as the new policy generally goes against the project manager for the more Leitch agenda on lifelong learn- 2008 maths grads project, exploring ing and skills. It said, “We would Friday 8 February ways of increasing the numbers suggest that national needs Mary Cartwright taking mathematics-related would be best met by regarding Lecture, Oxford undergraduate courses. Makhan a much greater number of part- [page 3] has a wealth of experience that time mathematics ELQ students Monday 31 March will help him to take the project as exempt (or at least eligible for Northern Regional forwards. In particular, he has val- some degree of support via a tar- Meeting, Manchester uable project management skills geted allocation) than just those [page 7] and has worked in other Widen- studying for a full (second) de- Friday 25 April ing Participation projects so he gree programme with substantial Women in has a full and practical apprecia- mathematical content. The sums Mathematics Day tion of what more maths grads involved would be very small as London [page 9] is aiming to achieve. Originally a proportion of the total math- training as an engineer, Makhan ematics spend, but would have a Monday 9 June has also spent time as a classroom substantial impact on take-up of Midlands Regional teacher. Makhan takes over from the opportunities for valuable re- Meeting, Birmingham Helen Orr who left the project in training and upskilling.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics and Astronomy ANNUAL REVIEW 2007 Contents
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY Physics and Astronomy ANNUAL REVIEW 2007 Contents Introduction Page 1 Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students Page 2 Staff Highlights and News Page 5 Alumni Matters Page 7 Public Outreach Page 8 Obituary to Professor Mike Seaton Page 9 Careers with a Physics Degree Page 10 Research Groups: Astrophysics Page 12 Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Positron Physics Page 15 High Energy Physics Page 18 Condensed Matter and Materials Physics Page 20 Grants and Contracts Page 23 Publications Page 25 Staff Page 32 Cover image is a Joseph Wood (University College London) and Jarlath McKenna (Queen’s University Belfast) from the Ultrafast While every effort has been made to ensure the Physics UCL/QUB collaboration working on the hollow fibre chirped accuracy of the information in this document, the mirror pulse compressor at the Central Laser Facility (Rutherford Department cannot accept responsibility for any Appleton Laboratory).The ten femtosecond laser pulses generated errors or omissions contained herein. are used to create, image and control nuclear wavepackets in hydrogenic molecular systems. The trace in the A copy of this review and further details about the background of the page is an illustration of a vibrational revival department may be found on the website in deuterium ions, which have been modelled and experimental http://www.phys.ucl.ac.uk imaged by the collaboration. This work was recently published in Physical Review A. Edited by Kate Heyworth, if you have any comments or suggestions for the 2008 issue please contact Kate at [email protected] Introduction “UCL is booming”, so started the White Paper on Modernising UCL published by the Provost in Introduction Page 1 June.
    [Show full text]