DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft of Common Indicator Factsheets for Biodiversity (EO1), NIS (EO2) and Fisheries (EO3)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft of Common Indicator Factsheets for Biodiversity (EO1), NIS (EO2) and Fisheries (EO3) UNITED NATIONS UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.430/3 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 31 January 2017 Original: English Meeting of the Correspondence Group on Monitoring (CORMON), Biodiversity and Fisheries Madrid, Spain, 28th February – 1st March 2017 Agenda item 4: Common indicator factsheets for biodiversity (EO1), NIS (EO2) and Fisheries (EO3) Draft of Common indicator factsheets for Biodiversity (EO1), NIS (EO2) and Fisheries (EO3) For environmental and economy reasons, this document is printed in a limited number and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP SPA/RAC - Tunis, 2017 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.430/3 Page 1 SOMMAIRE 1. Introduction 2 2. Common Indicator Factsheet 4 2.1.Common indicator 1: Habitat distributional range (EO1) 4 2.2. Common indicator 2: Condition of the habitat’s typical species and communities (EO1) 8 2.3. Common indicator 3: Species distributional range (marine mammals) (EO1) 12 2.4. Common indicator 3: Species distributional range (reptiles) (EO1) 17 2.5. Common indicator 3: Species distributional range (seabirds) (EO1) 24 2.6. Common indicator 4: Species population abundance (marine mammals) (EO1) 30 2.7. Common indicator 4: Population abundance (reptiles) (EO1) 36 2.8. Common indicator 4: Species population abundance (seabirds) (EO1) 45 2.9. Common indicator 5: Population demographic characteristics (marine mammals) (EO1) 51 2.10. Common indicator 5: Population demographic characteristics (reptiles) (EO 1) 57 2.11. Common indicator 5: Population demographic characteristics (seabirds) (EO 1) 65 2.12. Common indicator 6: Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species (NIS) (EO 2) 73 2.13. Common indicator 7: Spawning stock biomass (EO3) 77 2.14. Common indicator 8: Total landing (EO3) 82 2.15. Common indicator 9: Fishing mortality (EO3) 88 2.16. Common indicator 10: Fishing effort (EO3) 93 2.17. Common Indicator 11: Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) (EO3) 98 2.18. Common indicator 12: Bycatch of vulnerable and non-target species (EO1-EO3) 103 Annexe 108 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.430/3 Page 2 1. Introduction 1. The 19th Meeting of Contracting Parties (COP 19), held in February 2016,adopted the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme (IMAP)of the Mediterranean Sea and Coast and Related Assessment Criteria. In its Decision IG. 22/7, a specific list of good environmental status common indicators and targets and principles of an integrated Mediterranean Monitoring and Assessment Programme, next to a clear timeline for the implementation of this Programme were detailed. 2. IMAP, through Decision IG.22/7 lays down the principles for an integrated monitoring, which will, for the first time, monitor biodiversity and non-indigenous species, pollution and marine litter, coast and hydrography in an integrated manner. The IMAP aims to facilitate the implementation of article 12 of the Barcelona Convention and several monitoring related provisions under different protocols with the main objective to assess GES. Its backbone is the 11 Ecological Objectives and their 27 common indicators as presented in the decision. 3. In the context of the Barcelona Convention, a common indicator is an indicator that summarizes data into a simple, standardized, and communicable figure and is ideally applicable in the whole Mediterranean basin, or at least on the level of sub-regions, and is monitored by all Contracting Parties. A common indicator is able to give an indication of the degree of threat or change in the marine ecosystem and can deliver valuable information to decision makers. 4. The UN Environment/MAP Programme of Work (PoW) adopted at COP 19, includes the Output 1.4.3 for the Implementation of IMAP (the EcAp-based integrated monitoring and assessment programme) coordinated, including GES common indicators fact sheets, and supported by a data information centre to be integrated into Info/MAP platform. 5. Therefore, the draft guidance factsheets within each Common Indicator needs to be developed for coherent monitoring, as well as their targets defined and agreed in order to deliver the achievement of Good Environmental Status (GES), In this context, this document outlines the Indicator Factsheets for the Ecological Objectives 1 (Biodiversity), 2 (Non-Indigenous Species) and 3 (Fisheries) as follows: Common indicator 1: Habitat distributional range (EO1) to also consider habitat extent as a relevant attribute; Common indicator 2: Condition of the habitat’s typical species and communities (EO1); Common indicator 3: Species distributional range (EO1 related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles); Common indicator 4: Population abundance of selected species (EO1, related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles); Common indicator 5: Population demographic characteristics (EO1, e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles); Common indicator 6: Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species, particularly invasive, non-indigenous species, notably in risk areas (EO2, in relation to the main vectors and pathways of spreading of such species); Common indicator 7: Spawning stock Biomass (EO3); Common indicator 8: Total landings (EO3); Common indicator 9: Fishing Mortality (EO3) Common indicator 10: Fishing effort (EO3) UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.430/3 Page 3 Common indicator 11: Catch per unit effort (CPUE) (EO3) Common indicator 12: Bycatch of vulnerable and non-target species (EO1 and EO3) 6. The main purpose of this draft Indicator Factsheets is to provide concrete guidance and references to Contracting Parties to support implementation of their revised national monitoring programme towards the overall goal of implementing the Ecosystem Approach (EcAp) in the Mediterranean Sea and achieving GES. 7. Common Indicator Factsheets were structured based on the following main sections (scheme below): A common set of relevant policy and science-based information (ie. Indicator Title, Rational, Policy Context and Targets, Indicator analysis methods and methodology for monitoring (temporal and spatial scope), Data analysis and assessment outputs, Contacts and Document Registration. Indicator Title IMAP reference No and Related Operational Proposed Relevant GES definition definition objective Traget Rationale Justification for indicator selection Scientific rationale and Scientific References marine policy context Policy Context and targets (including relevant Policy context description references) Targets Policy documents Indicator analysis methods Indicator Definition Methodology for indicator calculation Agreed scientific Indicator units methodologies in use, List of Guidance documents and protocols available including details Data Confidence and uncertainties monitoring Methodology for monitoring, temporal and spatial scope requirements Available Methodologies for Monitoring and Monitoring Protocols Available data sources Spatial scope guidance and selection of monitoring stations Temporal Scope guidance Data analysis and assessment outputs Data reporting, analysis Statistical analysis and basis for aggregation and aggregation Expected assessments outputs (output) Known gaps and uncertainties in the Mediterranean Contacts and version Date Document Registration Key contacts within UNEP for further information Version No Date Author UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.430/3 Page 4 2. Common indicator Factsheet 2.1. Common Indicator 1: Habitat distributional range (EO 1) Indicator Title Common Indicator 1: Habitat distributional range Relevant GES definition Related Operational Objective Proposed Target(s) Reference condition/reference The ECAP Operational Objective of As a target, the damaged or lost state is recommended as the the indicator for habitat area per habitat type, especially preferred approach to setting distributional range is that key for physically defined and not baselines for benthic habitats. coastal and marine habitats are not biogenic habitats could be set as Where possible, the reference being lost. to not exceed an acceptable conditions should be determined percentage of the baseline value. e.g. using historical maps/data, For habitats under protective modelling results. If the regulations (such as those listed determination of reference under the SPA/Biodiversity conditions is not possible, then Protocol, EU Nature directives) expert judgement should be the target could be set as habitat used giving particular loss stable or decreasing and not consideration to the current greater than the baseline value. state. Rationale Justification for indicator selection The loss of habitat extent i.e. from infrastructure developments and by damage from physical activities such as trawling and possibly damage from pollution is an important factor to monitor and assess. The indicator is in principle applicable to all habitat types across the Mediterranean region and it is considered to be highly sensitive to physical pressures. Scientific References List (author(s), year, Ref: journal, series, etc.) and url’s Andersen et al., 2013 Ban N.C., Alidina, H.M., Ardron, J.A., 2010. Cumulative impact mapping: advances, relevance and limitations to marine management and conservation, using Canada‘s Pacific waters as a case study. Mar. Policy 34, 876–886. Coggan, R., Populis, J., White, J., Sheehan, K., Fitzpatrick, F.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species
    United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre For Specially Protected Areas REPORT ON THE STATUS OF MEDITERRANEAN CHONDRICHTHYAN SPECIES D. CEBRIAN © L. MASTRAGOSTINO © R. DUPUY DE LA GRANDRIVE © Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2007 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] Citation: UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2007. Report on the status of Mediterranean chondrichthyan species. By Melendez, M.J. & D. Macias, IEO. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis. 241pp The original version (English) of this document has been prepared for the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) by : Mª José Melendez (Degree in Marine Sciences) & A. David Macías (PhD. in Biological Sciences). IEO. (Instituto Español de Oceanografía). Sede Central Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Avda. de Brasil, 31 Madrid Spain [email protected] 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION 3 3. HUMAN IMPACTS ON SHARKS 8 3.1 Over-fishing 8 3.2 Shark Finning 8 3.3 By-catch 8 3.4 Pollution 8 3.5 Habitat Loss and Degradation 9 4. CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN SHARKS 9 REFERENCES 10 ANNEX I. LIST OF CHONDRICHTHYAN OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 11 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean
    Plan of Action for Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean 2016 II Written by: Asaf Ariel, Adi Barash With comments from: Aviad Scheinin, Oren Sonin, Eric Diamant, Dor Adalist, Danny Golani, Danny Chernov, Menachem Goren, Eran Brokovitch, Tomer Kochen and Ruth Yahel Translation: Jennifer Levin Graphic Design: Yael Jicchaki-Golan Photography: Uri Ferro, Aviram Waldman, Aviad Scheinin, Adi Barash, Haggai Netiv, Shai Milat, Guy Hadash, Hod Ben Hurin, Charles Roffey, Brian Gratwicke Cover and back jacket photography: Uri Ferro Recommended citation: Ariel, A. and Barash, A. (2015). Action Plan for Protection of Sharks and Rays in the Israeli Mediterranean. EcoOcean Association. III Photography: Aviram Valdman, www.thetower.org/article/photos-worlds-beneath-the-sacred-waters,'Tower Magazine' IV Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................1 1. Introduction.......................................................................................3 1.1 The Objective of the Proposed Action Plan ....................................3 1.2 About the Model for the Action Plan .............................................3 2. Background .......................................................................................5 2.1 Sharks and rays and their ecological importance ......................5 2.2 Sharks and rays in the Mediterranean and in the coastal waters of Israel ............................................................................6 2.3 Factors that
    [Show full text]
  • Age, Growth Reproduction and Feed of Bottlenose Skate, Rostroraja Alba
    ICES CM 2010/E:25 Age, growth, reproduction and feed of bottlenose skate, Rostroraja alba (Lacepède, 1803) in Saros Bay, the north Aegean Sea Cigdem Yıgın and Ali Ismen Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Fishing and Processing Technology, Çanakkale 17100, Turkey [Tel: +902862180018 ext.1564; Fax: +902862180543] email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS The bottlenose skate, Rostroraja alba (Figure 1) is a benthic species of sandy and A total of 126 specimens of bottlenose skate was collected by using commercial trawls between March detrital bottoms from coastal waters to the upper slope region between about 40 to 2005 and December 2007 in Saros Bay (Figure 2). Trawling was during daytime and at night at depths 400m (Serena, 2005). ranging from 0 to 500 m. Most individuals were captured at depths of 5-50 and 50-100 m. The trawl was equipped with a 44 mm stretched mesh size net at the cod-end. Trawling lasted 30 min. Trawling speed was Length-weight relationships, age at maturity, longevity, reproductive age and 2.5 knots. periodicity, annual rate of population growth and natural mortality are all unknown for this skate although it was studied size at maturity, feeding habits (Bauchot, 1987) and Total length (TL) and disc width (DW) were measured to the nearest millimeter and body weight (W) to the reproduction biology (Serena, 2005). nearest gram. Statistical comparison of length-weight and disc width-weight relationships between sexes combined was performed by applying the t-test (Zar, 1999). This study presents significant new information on the maturity, growth and feeding habits of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Title CDI Report
    Lac Ayata dans la Vallée d’Oued Righ Quick-scan of options and preliminary recommendations for the Management of Lake Ayata in the Valley of Oued Righ Esther Koopmanschap Melike Hemmami Chris Klok Project Report Wageningen UR Centre for Development Innovation (CDI) works on processes of innovation and change in the areas of secure and healthy food, adaptive agriculture, sustainable markets and ecosystem governance. It is an interdisciplinary and internationally focused unit of Wageningen University & Research centre within the Social Sciences Group. Through facilitating innovation, brokering knowledge and supporting capacity development, our group of 60 staff help to link Wageningen UR’s expertise to the global challenges of sustainable and equitable development. CDI works to inspire new forms of learning and collaboration between citizens, governments, businesses, NGOs and the scientific community. More information: www.cdi.wur.nl Innovation & Change Ecosystem Governance Adaptive Agriculture Sustainable Markets Secure & Healthy Food Project BO-10-006-073 (2008) / BO-10-001-058 (2009), Wetland Management Algeria This research project has been carried out within the Policy Supporting Research within the framework of programmes for the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, Theme: Bilateral Activities (2008) / International Cooperation (2009), cluster: International Cooperation . Lac Ayata dans la Vallée d’Oued Righ Quick-scan of options and preliminary recommendations for the Management of Lake Ayata in the Valley of
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Eng
    GUIDELINES FOR INVENTORYING AND MONITORING OF DARK HABITATS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Financial support Copyright: All property rights of texts and content of different types of this publication belong to SPA/RAC. Reproduction of these texts and contents, in whole or in part, and in any form, is prohibited without prior written permission from SPA/RAC, except for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. © 2018 - United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 1080 Tunis Cedex - Tunisia. E-mail : [email protected] For bibliographic purposes, this document may be cited as: SPA/RAC–UN Environment/MAP, OCEANA, 2017. Guidelines for inventorying and monitoring of dark habitats in the Mediterranean Sea. By Vasilis GEROVASILEIOU, Ricardo AGUILAR, Pilar MARÍN. Ed. SPA/RAC -Deep Sea Lebanon Project, Tunis: 40 pp + Annexes The original version of this document was prepared for the Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) by Ricardo AGUILAR & Pilar MARÍN, OCEANA and Vasilis GEROVASILEIOU, SPA/ RAC Consultant with contribution from Tatjana BAkRAN PETRICIOLI, Enric BALLESTEROS, Hocein BAzAIRI, Carlo NIkE BIANCHI, Simona BUSSOTTI, Simonepietro CANESE, Pierre CHEVALDONNé, Douglas EVANS, Maïa FOURT, Jordi GRINYó, Jean Georges HARMELIN, Alain JEUDY DE GRISSAC, Vesna Mačić, Covadonga OREJAS, Maria DEL MAR OTERO, Gérard PERGENT, Donat PETRICIOLI, Alfonso A. RAMOS ESPLá, Antonietta ROSSO, Rossana SANFILIPPO, Marco TAVIANI, Leonardo TUNESI, Maurizio WüRTz. Layout: Amen Allah OUAkAJJA Cover photo credit: © Amen Allah OUAkAJJA This document has been edited within the framework of the Deep-Sea Lebanon Project with the fnancial support of MAVA Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Batoids and Chimaeras Relevant to Fisheries Management a Pocket Guide Fao
    NORTH ATLANTIC BATOIDS AND CHIMAERAS RELEVANT TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT A POCKET GUIDE FAO. North Atlantic Batoids and Chimaeras Relevant to Fisheries Management. A Pocket Guide. Rome, FAO. 2012. 84 cards. For feedback and questions contact: FishFinder Programme, Marine and Inland Fisheries Service (FIRF), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. [email protected] Programme Manager: Johanne Fischer, FAO Rome, Italy Author: Matthias Stehmann, ICHTHYS, Hamburg, Germany Colour illustrations and cover: Emanuela D’Antoni, FAO Rome, Italy Scientific and technical revisers: Nicoletta De Angelis, Edoardo Mostarda, FAO Rome, Italy Digitization of distribution maps: Fabio Carocci, FAO Rome, Italy Page composition: Edoardo Mostarda, FAO Rome, Italy Produced with support of the EU. Reprint: August 2013 Thedesignations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107365-0 (Print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107883-9 (PDF) FAO 2012 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • AC24 Inf. 5 (English and Spanish Only / Únicamente En Francés Y Español / Seulement En Anglais Et Espagnol)
    AC24 Inf. 5 (English and Spanish only / únicamente en francés y español / seulement en anglais et espagnol) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-fourth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva, (Switzerland), 20-24 April 2009 SHARKS:CONSERVATION, FISHING AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE This information document has been submitted by Spain. * * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. AC24 Inf. 5 – p. 1 Sharks: Conservation, Fishing and International Trade Norma Eréndira García Núñez GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y MEDIO RURAL Y MARINO Sharks: Conservation, Fishing and International Trade MINISTERIO GOBIERNO DE MEDIO AMBIENTE DE ESPAÑA Y MEDIO RURAL Y MARINO 2008 Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino. Catalogación de la Biblioteca Central GARCÍA NÚÑEZ, NORMA ERÉNDIRA Tiburones: conservación, pesca y comercio internacional = Sharks: conservation, fishing and international trade / Norma Eréndira García Núñez. — Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, 2008. — 236 p. : il. ; 30 cm ISBN 978-84-8320-474-0 1. TIBURON 2. ESPECIES EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCION 3. COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL 4. ECOLOGIA MARINA I. España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino II. Título 639.231 597.3 Cita: García Núñez, N.E. 2008, Tiburones: conservación, pesca y comercio internacional.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recovery/Conservation Programme for Marine Species of Conservation Importance
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR065 A recovery/conservation programme for marine species of conservation importance First published 20 December 2011 www.naturalengland.org.uk Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Natural England commissioned this project to should result in the relevant species becoming provide an auditable, transparent methodology self-sustaining members of their ecosystems. for prioritising marine species recovery programmes in the UK waters around England. This report should be cited as: The aim of the work is to identify the HISCOCK, K., BAYLEY, D., PADE, N., COX, E. conservation needs of all marine Biodiversity & LACEY, C. 2011. A recovery / conservation Action Plan (BAP), OSPAR and WCA species in programme for marine species of conservation English waters, that are not considered to be importance. Natural England Commissioned afforded sufficient protection by the forthcoming Reports, Number 065. Marine Protected Areas network. The results will be used by Natural England to improve our understanding the marine species that are most in need of targeted conservation action. The report focuses on designing a prioritisation methodology that will be used to inform evidence based and transparent decision making regarding species recovery in the marine environment and where possible,
    [Show full text]
  • Egg-Capsules and Young
    Rays and Skates (Raice). No. I.—Egg-Capsules and Young. By Robert S. Clark, M.A., B.Sc, Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory. With Figures 1-20 in the Text. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ........ 578 General scheme ....... 580 Species occurring at Plymouth ..... 581 Orientation of egg-capsules in the uterus . 582 Deposition of egg-capsules ..... 582 Fertilisation of the egg ...... 583 Egg-capsules—structure and composition . 584 Aeration of the capsule ...... 585 Orientation of embryo in the capsule . 586' Period of incubation of the embryo . ... 587 Occurrence of egg-capsules ..... Sizes of egg-capsules ...... 589 Branchial filaments ...... 591 Temperatures of Laboratory tanks .... 591 Descriptions of egg-capsules and post-embryenic stages 593 Species:— Raia datxita ....... 593 B. maculata ....... 601 B. brachyura ..... 608 B. microceliata ....... 615 B. nasvus . 618 B. fyttas 624 B. undulata .... ... 627 R. batis 629 B. marginata ....... 632 Food of early young stages ..... 635 Becords of egg-capsules in stomachs of other fish 636 Summary ........ 636 Literature cited ....... 640 NEW SERIES.—VOL. XII. NO. 4. OCTOBER, 1922. 2 o ..s 578 R. S. CLARK. INTKODUCTION. THE family Raiidse belongs to the division Batoidei of the sub-order Hypotremata, and is represented by the principal genera Raia, Psammo- batis, and Sympterygia (Regan, 1906). The genus Raia (an altered spelling of Raja) was instituted by Linnseus, after Artedi, for the type Raja batis in the Systema Naturae, Ed. X, Vol. I, 1758. The species are numerous and mostly of northern distribution. They are not very well denned, and the synonymy of many of them is distinctly doubtful, and in some cases quite erroneous, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations United Nations Environment Programme
    UNITED NATIONS UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.420/Inf.19 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 11 September 2015 Original: English 5th Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach Coordination Group Rome, Italy, 14-15 September 2015 GFCM Input in relation to the draft list of species and habitats For environmental and economic reasons, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP Athens, 2015 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.420/Inf.19 Page 1 GFCM input in relation to the draft list of species and habitats Introduction In the framework of the activities of common interest to the GFCM and UNEP-MAP, as expressed in our common Memorandum of Understanding, and specifically within the work carried out by the GFCM towards the assessment and monitoring of the status of Mediterranean and Black Sea exploited populations and their ecosystems, the GFCM has been actively participating in the definition of indicators, targets and monitoring needs within the UNEP-MAP Ecosystem Approach, especially in relation to Descriptor 3. The work is being carried out under the framework of the Scientific Advisory Committee on Fisheries (SAC) and communication with UNEP-MAP and its relevant technical groups on these issues have been carried out through the Secretariats of the GFCM and UNEP-MAP. Acting on the request (in July 2015) from the UNEP-MAP secretariat to provide inputs to the draft list of species and habitats for the attention of the 5th Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach Coordination Group (Rome, Italy, 14-15 September 2015), the GFCM Secretariat will like to provide the information included within the GFCM Data Collection Reference Framework (DCRF), approved by the SAC and endorsed by the GFCM at its 39th Session (May 2015) as the most up-to-date adopted work of the GFCM on priority species and monitoring needs.
    [Show full text]
  • SAC16/2014/Inf.25
    GFCM:SAC16/2014/Inf.25 GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES POUR LA MÉDITERRANÉE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC) Sixteenth session St Julian’s, Malta, 17–20 March 2014 Proposal on the definition of Good Environmental Status and associated indicators and targets for commercially exploited fish and shellfish populations INTRODUCTION 1. Within the framework of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with UNEP-Map in 2012, and supported by a dedicated FWP project (Medsuit: A Mediterranean Cooperation for the Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Resources funded by the Italian Ministry of Environment and presented to the 37th Commission), preliminary work on harmonizing the definition and assessment of good environmental status for marine living resources has been carried out in the period of December 2013 – January 2014. 2. As a first result of this work, a technical proposal for the identification of operational objectives, indicators, Good Environmental Status (GES) and targets for Ecological Objective 3 (Harvest of commercially exploited fish and shellfish) within the UNEP-MAP Ecosystem Approach Process (EcAP) was prepared by the GFCM Secretariat. The proposal took into account initial drafts discussed through the EcAP, and especially the work done by the different GFCM technical bodies, including the work by the SAC and in particular in the Subcommittee of Stock Assessment, the GFCM Guidelines for multiannual management plans1, and the technical aspects on indicators and reference points discussed during the Framework Programme meetings on management plans2. An initial draft of this document has been presented in the UNEP-Map Integrated Correspondence Groups of GES and Targets meeting (Athens, Greece, 17-19 February 2014), and this document is a revised version including the comments received.
    [Show full text]