DOCSLIB.ORG

Bozio, Ecologies of Thought

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bozio, Ecologies of Thought Ecologies of Thought in Early Modern English Drama by Andrew Jonathan Bozio A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2013 Doctoral Committee: Professor Michael C. Schoenfeldt, Chair Associate Professor George P. Hoffmann Associate Professor Steven G. Mullaney Professor Theresa L. Tinkle Professor Valerie J. Traub © Andrew Bozio 2013 Acknowledgements Like any work that develops over the course of several years, this dissertation has been shaped and supported by many extraordinary individuals, and I’m very pleased to be able to thank them there. I’ve had the good fortune to work with an incredible dissertation committee, whose contributions to this project have left me deeply humbled. One of the greatest pleasures of graduate school has been working with Michael Schoenfeldt, whose enthusiasm and support for this endeavor has been unflagging. Mike’s warmth, generosity, and piercing intellect have made him universally beloved within the profession, and I feel very grateful to have learned so much from him while at Michigan. Steven Mullaney has been instrumental in shaping this project. Our shared interest in cognition and in theories of space provided early encouragement in undertaking this research, and he helped to excavate aspects of the argument that remained invisible to me, guiding our conversations with deeply astute questions that challenged me to rethink the terms of this project. Similarly, I owe an incredible debt to Valerie Traub, whose careful reading of this work helped to give the argument shape and solidity. From the beginning of this project, she pushed me to clarify my thinking, and that precision of thought saved the dissertation from becoming mired in abstraction. George Hoffmann consistently left me humbled by his generosity and his insightfulness, and his encyclopedic knowledge of the early modern period added nuance and depth to many of the claims made here. Finally, Theresa Tinkle’s enthusiasm and ii generosity renewed my commitment to higher education. Her wit and warmth sustained me through the most challenging moments of completing this dissertation. In writing this dissertation, I benefited from several institutions and individuals, each of whom supported the development of a particular aspect of the argument. Much of my research was funded by grants from the Rackham Graduate School, the Program in Medieval and Early Studies, and the Making Publics Project at McGill University, and I am very pleased to able to thank those institutions, as well as the research staff at the British Library, the Folger Shakespeare Library, the Wellcome Library, the Newberry Library, and the Cambridge University Library. At Michigan, I benefited enormously from exceptional faculty members, especially Sara Blair, Alison Cornish, Gregg Crane, Danny Hack, David Halperin, Barbara Hodgdon, Diane Owen Hughes, Kerry Larson, Adela Pinch, Cathy Sanok, Karla Taylor, Doug Trevor, and Ralph Williams. I am also grateful to Barbara Rosenwein, of Loyola University Chicago, for her seminar at the Newberry Library, which allowed me to begin the work that would become chapter two. Portions of this dissertation were presented or circulated at the Premodern Colloquium, the MEMS Dissertation Colloquium, the Mellon Dissertation Seminar run by William Paulson, and at annual meetings of the Shakespeare Association of America and the Renaissance Society of America. I’m grateful to my audiences and interlocutors there, and in particular to the many scholars who, in extended conversation, helped the argument to take its present shape: Erika Lin, Marissa Greenberg, Cary DiPietro, Kurt Schreyer, Gina Bloom, and Evelyn Tribble. While a graduate student, I have been supported by fantastic colleagues and by exceptional institutional resources. My thanks, in particular, go to my cohort and to my fellow early modernists, including Chris Barnes, Katherine Brokaw, Carolyn Dekker, Ari Friedlander, Tim Green, Sarah Linwick, Alice Keane, Adam Mazel, Ben Pollak, Rebecca iii Porte, Amy Rodgers, Stephen Spiess, Leila Watkins, Kathryn Will, Rebecca Wiseman, and Cordelia Zukerman. I am also deeply indebted to the wonderful staff in the English Department, especially to Jan Burgess, whose patience and guidance have shaped my graduate career from the very beginning, and to Senia Vasquez, Karly Mitchell, Bonnie Campbell, Lisa Curtis, and Linda Deitert. In their capacity as jobseeker coordinators, Melanie Yergeau and Sidonie Smith offered insightful feedback on the abstract for this dissertation, and their comments helped to reframe the intellectual scope of the project. I am also grateful to the many individuals who have influenced my approach to teaching. With their enthusiasm and their insight, they reminded me of both the pleasure and the political urgency of our work within the academy, and I know that I will be in their debt for as long as I am in the classroom. In particular, I would like to thank Theresa Tinkle, Jennifer Bryan, Justin Kolb, Tershia Pinder-Grover, and all those who contributed to the 2011 Preparing Future Faculty Seminar. Finally, whenever the pleasant solitude of writing this dissertation lost its charm, I was fortunate to have a wonderful community of friends, family, and loved ones, without whom I simply could not have completed this project. They include Melanie Adams, Daphna Atias, Brent Beam, Catherine Bozio, Joe Breakey, Michelle Fortin, Lisa Gottlieb, Justin Joque, Michael-Salomon Jost, Eric Kampe, Dan McAdams, Jeff McCabe, Caroline Miller, Rebecca Pallmeyer, Dan Vernia, Jörg Zeller, and Cordelia Zukerman. To Ruth McAdams, I owe everything – her love and support have made these years the happiest and most fulfilling that I have known. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Introduction Cognitive Ecologies on the Early Modern Stage 1 Chapter One Amatory Cognition and the Shape of Cosmos in John Lyly’s Endymion 20 I. Amatory Cognition and the Neoplatonic Cosmos 32 II. The Displaced Soul and Endymion’s Place in the Universe 58 i. Endymion in Extracosmic Space 64 ii. Cynthia’s Rule over Intramundane Place 77 III. The Spatial Politics of Cynthia’s Court 84 Chapter Two The Ecology of Remembrance: Memory, Place, and Affect in Dido, Queen of Carthage 102 I. Moving through Memory: Troy’s Destruction and the Arts of Memory 106 II. Ecological Memory and the Reconstruction of Troy 121 i. Aeneas’s Hallucination before the Walls of Carthage 121 ii. Translatio Imperii as a Form of Memory 128 III. Troynovant and the Place of Memory in Early Modern London 138 Chapter Three Embodiment and the Perception of Place in King Lear 144 I. Early Modern Phenomenology and the Perception of Place 147 II. Phenomenology and the Space of Dover Cliff 155 III. Cognition in the Wild: Lear’s Emplacement in the Storm 162 v IV. The Performativity of Space 177 Chapter Four Bartholomew Fair and the Performativity of Space 182 I. “When’t comes to the fair once”: Performativity and the Theatrical Conception of Smithfield 187 i. The Performative Constitution of Space 187 ii. Performativity and the Displacement of Memory 192 II. “I’the heart o’the fair”: Thinking Smithfield 196 i. The Captivation of Bartholomew Cokes: The Fair as Umwelt 200 ii. Zeal-of-the-land Busy and the Disenchantment with Space 209 III. Emergence and Smithfield 215 Conclusion The Poetics of Emplacement 219 Bibliography 224 vi Introduction Cognitive Ecologies on the Early Modern Stage In the Induction to John Marston’s The Malcontent, Will Sly stages a complex meditation on the relationship between memory and space within early modern performance.1 Posing as a playgoer, Sly refutes the stagehand’s complaint that one cannot sit onstage at the Globe, arguing that “We may sit upon the stage at the private house,” and he further justifies his tactical displacement of performance space by claiming that he must aid the playgoers: “I am one that hath seen this play often and can give them intelligence for their action.”2 The Malcontent was first performed by the boy actors at Blackfriars, and Sly implies that his memory of this previous performance will enable him to correct whatever discrepancies appear when Burbage’s company enacts it within the Globe.3 Suggestively, he claims to supplement his memory with two forms of cognitive scaffolding, the one an object, the other a practice. “I have most of the jests [performed at Blackfriars] here in my table- 1 Of the three quarto versions of The Malcontent to appear in 1604, the first two list John Marston as the sole author, with the third including John Webster and noting that augmentations have been made. The Induction only appears in this third quarto, and although there have been questions regarding its authorship, Charles Cathcart notes that “a certain consensus has been reached” favoring Webster as the author of the Induction. See Cathcart, “John Marston, The Malcontent, and the King’s Men” The Review of English Studies, New Series, 57.228 (2006): 43. Nevertheless, I follow convention in using Marston’s name when speaking of the play. 2 John Marston, The Malcontent in English Renaissance Drama, David Bevington, Lars Engle, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Eric Rasmussen, eds. (New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), Induction.2, 14-5. All further references are from the Induction and will be cited parenthetically. 3 Sly and the actors – Richard Burbage, John Lowin, and Henry Condell – comment explicitly on this appropriation of The Malcontent. When Sly asks with regard to Marston’s play, “I wonder you would play it, another company having interest in it,” Condell figures it as recompense for the boy actors’ theft of The Spanish Tragedy, correlating an actor’s age and height with the size of a page: “Why not Malevole in folio with us, as Jeronimo in decimo-sexto with them? They taught us a name for our play; we call it One for Another” (75-9).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3D Computer Modelling the Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606)
    3D Computer Modelling The Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606) *** Research Document Compiled by Dr Roger Clegg Computer Model created by Dr Eric Tatham, Mixed Reality Ltd. 1 BLANK PAGE 2 Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….………………….………………6-7 Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9-10 1. Introduction……………………..………...……………………………………………………….............………....11-15 2. The plot of land 2.1 The plot………………………………………………..………………………….………….……….……..…17-19 2.2 Sewer and boundary ditches……………………………………………….……………….………….19-23 3. The Rose playhouse, Phase I (1587-1591) 3.1 Bridges and main entrance……………………..……………………………………,.……………….25-26 3.2 Exterior decoration 3.2.1 The sign of the Rose…………………………………………………………………………27-28 3.2.2 Timber frame…………………………………………………..………………………………28-31 3.3. Walls…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32-33 3.3.1 Outer walls………………………………………………………….…………………………..34-36 3.3.2 Windows……………………………………………………………..…………...……………..37-38 3.3.3 Inner walls………………………………………………………………………………………39-40 3.4 Timber superstructure…………………………………………….……….…………….…….………..40-42 3.4.1 The Galleries………………………………………………..…………………….……………42-47 3.4.2 Jutties……………………………………………………………...….…………………………..48-50 3.5 The yard………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….50-51 3.5.1 Relative heights………………………………………………...……………...……………..51-57 3.5.2. Main entrance to the playhouse……………………………………………………….58-61 3.6. ‘Ingressus’, or entrance into the lower gallery…………………………..……….……………62-65 3.7 Stairways……………………………………………………………………………………………………....66-71
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00489-4 - The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Updated Edition Edited by Kurt Schlueter Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE general editor Brian Gibbons associate general editor A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood. From 1990 to 1994 the General Editor was Brian Gibbons and the Associate General Editors were A. R. Braunmuller and Robin Hood. THE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA Professor Schlueter approaches this early comedy as a parody of two types of Renaissance educational fiction: the love-quest story and the test-of-friendship story, which by their combination show high-flown human ideals as incompatible with each other, and with human nature. A thoroughly researched, illustrated stage history reveals changing conceptions of the play, which nevertheless often fail to come to terms with its subversive impetus. Since the first known production at David Garrick’s Drury Lane Theatre, it has tempted major directors and actors, including John Philip Kemble, William Charles Macready and Charles Kean, who established a tradition of understanding which cast its shadow even on such modern productions as Denis Carey’s famous staging for the Bristol Old Vic and Robin Phillips’s for the Royal Shakespeare Company. This updated edition includes a new introductory section by Lucy Munro on recent stage
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANTIC CRITICISM of SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By
    ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By JOHN g,RAWFORD Associate of Arts Texarkana College Texarkana, Texas 1956 Bachelor of Science in Education Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia, Arkansas 1959 Master of Science in Education Drake University Des Moines, Iowa 1962 Submitted to the faculty of .the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May, 1968 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OCT 24 1968 ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser \ f ,A .. < \ Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to· thank anumber·of people who helped me in many different ways during· the·preparation· of .this dissertation, notably Dr. David· S. Berkeley,·major adviser, who-lent words of encouragement, guidance, understanding, and patience; but also my committee members, Dr. Darrel Ray·, Pr~ Judson Milburn, and· .Dr~- Loyd Douglas; and. the Oklahoma State University library staff, especially Miss Helen Donart and Mrs • .:fosephine Monk. iii TABLE-OF CONTENTS Chap tel' Page. I. INTRODUCTION •••• 1 II. HAMLET .••• . ' . .. ... 29 III. ANTONY -~ CLEOPATRA • • • • . • • . • • • It • . • • . • .• • a1 ·IV. HENRYV· . ,. ". .• . 122 V. THE· MERCHANT ·QE. VENICE .- . "' . 153 VI. CONCLUSION • • ' . -. ,. 187 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • · • . .. 191 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Of all the so-called schools of Shakespearian criticism, the Romantic has been and continues to be one of the most influential. Per- haps this is true merely because of the impor~ance which the Romantic School places upon the genius of the subj~ct, for all schools of criti- cism recognize Shakespeare's ability at creating effective drama. A more accurate answer, however, probably lies in the fact that "romanti- cism" has a broad base and encompasses so very much.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates in the Digital Humanities This Page Intentionally Left Blank DEBATES in the DIGITAL HUMANITIES
    debates in the digital humanities This page intentionally left blank DEBATES IN THE DIGITAL HUMANITIES Matthew K. Gold editor University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London Chapter 1 was previously published as “What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?” ADE Bulletin, no. 150 (2010): 55– 61. Chap- ter 2 was previously published as “The Humanities, Done Digitally,” The Chron- icle of Higher Education, May 8, 2011. Chapter 17 was previously published as “You Work at Brown. What Do You Teach?” in #alt- academy, Bethany Nowviskie, ed. (New York: MediaCommons, 2011). Chapter 28 was previously published as “Humanities 2.0: Promises, Perils, Predictions,” PMLA 123, no. 3 (May 2008): 707– 17. Copyright 2012 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401- 2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Debates in the digital humanities / [edited by] Matthew K. Gold. ISBN 978-0-8166-7794-8 (hardback)—ISBN 978-0-8166-7795-5 (pb) 1. Humanities—Study and teaching (Higher)—Data processing. 2. Humanities —Technological innovations. 3. Digital media. I. Gold, Matthew K.. AZ182.D44 2012 001.3071—dc23 2011044236 Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal- opportunity educator and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Kemp, Shakespeare, and the Composition of Romeo and Juliet
    162 Issues in Review 43 See A.J. Hoenselaars, Images of Englishmen and Foreigners in the Drama of Shake- speare and His Contemporaries: A Study in Stage Characters and National Identity in English Renaissance Drama (London and Toronto, 1992). 44 G.K. Hunter, ‘Porter, Henry (d. 1599)’, The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004) http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/22568 (accessed 21 Dec 2006). 45 Henslowe’s Diary, 63, 242–3. 46 See Hunter, ‘Porter, Henry’. 47 Lucy Munro, ‘Early Modern Drama and the Repertory Approach’, Research Oppor- tunities in Renaissance Drama 42 (2003), 1–33. Will Kemp, Shakespeare, and the Composition of Romeo and Juliet ‘Enter Will Kemp’, states Romeo and Juliet’s 1599 second quarto in its uniquely specific stage direction towards the end of scene 17.1 This uniqueness makes the quarto, which editors know as Q2, a crucially important witness to the play’s early performances, and to Kemp’s career with Shakespeare and the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The Romeo and Juliet quartos, however, contain a number of other curious references to Kemp which act as further evidence of the working relationship between the dramatist and his company’s star clown. A comparison of the play’s two earliest quartos, Q1 of 1597 and Q2 of 1599, shows the clown role to be both malleable and formative in the work’s ongoing generic development. A study of Kemp in the play, through the textual anomalies which separate the printed quartos, thus provides a record of some of the transformations Romeo and Juliet underwent during the first years of its existence, as the company corrected, revised, abridged, and changed the scripts in order to capitalize on and contain the famous clown’s distinctive talents.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Linguistics and 17Th-Century Prostitution.Indb
    McEnery, Anthony, and Helen Baker. "Life as a 17th-Century Prostitute." Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 33–89. Corpus and Discourse. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474295062.0006>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 05:00 UTC. Copyright © Anthony McEnery and Helen Baker 2017. You may share this work for non- commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 Life as a 17th-Century Prostitute Free as light and air I walk, And uncontroll ’ d my passions guide; I eat and drink and sing and talk, And something else I do beside; Hither then, my followers come, And, on the couch, the seat of bliss, I ’ ll strait conduct the hero home, And shew you what this something is. 1 2.1 Introduction – historical research on early modern prostitution If we asked our readers to imagine a seventeenth-century prostitute, it is likely that some might picture a beautifully dressed and youthful courtesan, perhaps attending the playhouse with her wealthy lover but keeping a mindful watch for potential suitors. Others might visualize a wretched streetwalker, her appearance visibly marred by the tolls of venereal disease, alcoholism and physical abuse, attempting to interest a passer-by in a brief outdoor transaction. Both of these images do have their place in early modern England but they represent polar extremes of a profession that spanned a great range of social class and economic status and which women turned to for diff erent reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • British Renaissance Poets
    Critical Survey of Poetry British Renaissance Poets Editor Rosemary M. Canfield Reisman Charleston Southern University Salem Press A Division of EBSCO Publishing, Ipswich, Massachusetts Cover photo: Sir Walter Ralegh (© PoodlesRock/Corbis) Copyright © 2012, by Salem Press, A Division of EBSCO Publishing, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or me- chanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews or in the copying of images deemed to be freely licensed or in the public domain. For information address the publisher, Sa- lem Press, at [email protected]. ISBN: 978-1-58765-908-9 pod ISBN: 978-1-42983-657-1 CONTENTS Contributors . iv English Poetry in the Sixteenth Century . 1 English Poetry in the Seventeenth Century. 20 Thomas Campion . 43 Thomas Carew. 53 George Chapman . 61 Abraham Cowley . 72 Richard Crashaw . 83 Thomas Dekker . 93 John Donne. 104 George Herbert. 123 Ben Jonson . 135 Christopher Marlowe. 148 Andrew Marvell . 157 Thomas Nashe . 169 Sir Walter Ralegh. 177 William Shakespeare. 188 Sir Philip Sidney . 200 Robert Southwell. 214 Edmund Spenser . 222 Henry Howard, earl of Surrey . 237 Henry Vaughan. 246 Checklist for Explicating a Poem . 255 Bibliography . 258 Category Index . 265 Subject Index. 268 iii CONTRIBUTORS Rosemary Ascherl Sidney Gottlieb Robert M. Otten Colchester, Connecticut Sacred Heart University Marymount University Elizabeth J. Bellamy Katherine Hanley Samuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting
    CHICAGO 30 March–1 April 2017 RSA 2017 Annual Meeting, Chicago, 30 March–1 April Photograph © 2017 The Art Institute of Chicago. Institute The Art © 2017 Photograph of Chicago. Institute The Art © 2017 Photograph The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting Program Chicago 30 March–1 April 2017 Front and back covers: Jacob Halder and Workshop, English, Greenwich, active 1576–1608. Portions of a Field Armor, ca. 1590. Steel, etched and gilded, iron, brass, and leather. George F. Harding Collection, 1982.2241a-h. Art Institute of Chicago. Contents RSA Executive Board .......................................................................5 RSA Staff ........................................................................................6 RSA Donors in 2016 .......................................................................7 RSA Life Members ...........................................................................8 RSA Patron Members....................................................................... 9 Sponsors ........................................................................................ 10 Program Committee .......................................................................10 Discipline Representatives, 2015–17 ...............................................10 Participating Associate Organizations ............................................. 11 Registration and Book Exhibition ...................................................14 Policy on Recording and Live
    [Show full text]
  • London and Its Main Drainage, 1847-1865: a Study of One Aspect of the Public Health Movement in Victorian England
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England Lester J. Palmquist University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Palmquist, Lester J., "London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England" (1971). Student Work. 395. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LONDON .ML' ITS MAIN DRAINAGE, 1847-1865: A STUDY OF ONE ASPECT OP TEE PUBLIC HEALTH MOVEMENT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Lester J. Palmquist June 1971 UMI Number: EP73033 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73033 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • A.C.BRADLEY Ajffd HIS D Ffluefcr Hf Twerl'leth
    A.C.BRADLEY AJffD HIS D fF lUEFCR Hf TWERl'lETH UEMTURY SHAEESÎPEARE CRTTIc is m , BY Katharine Lee« Côûjc;^ K. H. 3. L)3 m V CLAub No. Co^ A Ü C. ^ 0, » t, 3it> DAfE ACQ fife, rtbîr. ProQuest Number: 10107236 All rights reserved INF0RMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10107236 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 'L SYNOPSIS. This thesis sets out to discuss the criticism of A.C.Bradley (I85I-I935) paying especial attention to twentieth century interpretationsof his work; which, it appears, hear more CrihcAsm relation to the needs of twentieth century^than to the actual dicta of A.C.Bradley. As twentieth century attitudes are not uniform the Introduction shows some of the contradictory elements in the modern picture of Bradley. Chapter 2 summarises Bradley's life and surveys some of his nwn-literary writings as a corrective to twentieth century impressions. Chapter 3 sets out his critical principles so that the main part of the thesis which follows may he hased on some more factual found­ ation than twentieth century opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Afrocentric Spiritual Jazz in 21St Century Chicago
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Sacred Freedom: Sustaining Afrocentric Spiritual Jazz in 21St Century Chicago Adam Zanolini The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1617 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SACRED FREEDOM: SUSTAINING AFROCENTRIC SPIRITUAL JAZZ IN 21ST CENTURY CHICAGO by ADAM ZANOLINI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ADAM ZANOLINI All Rights Reserved ii Sacred Freedom: Sustaining Afrocentric Spiritual Jazz in 21st Century Chicago by Adam Zanolini This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Music in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________ __________________________________________ DATE David Grubbs Chair of Examining Committee _________________ __________________________________________ DATE Norman Carey Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: _________________ __________________________________________ DATE Jeffrey Taylor _________________ __________________________________________ DATE Fred Moten _________________ __________________________________________ DATE Michele Wallace iii ABSTRACT Sacred Freedom: Sustaining Afrocentric Spiritual Jazz in 21st Century Chicago by Adam Zanolini Advisor: Jeffrey Taylor This dissertation explores the historical and ideological headwaters of a certain form of Great Black Music that I call Afrocentric spiritual jazz in Chicago. However, that label is quickly expended as the work begins by examining the resistance of these Black musicians to any label.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the University of Chicago Office of the President, Kimpton Administration Records 1892-1960
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the University of Chicago Office of the President, Kimpton Administration Records 1892-1960 © 2007 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Historical Note 3 Scope Note 4 Related Resources 5 Subject Headings 6 INVENTORY 6 Series I: General Files 6 Series II: Appointments and Budgets 166 Series III: Invitations 174 Series IV: Audiovisual Materials 174 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.OFCPRESKIMPTON Title University of Chicago. Office of the President. Kimpton Administration. Records Date 1892-1960 Size 155.5 linear feet (311 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A. Abstract This collection contains records of the University of Chicago Office of the President, covering the administration of Lawrence A. Kimpton, who served as Chancellor of the University of Chicago from 1951-1960. While he kept the title of "Chancellor" held by his predecessor, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Kimpton’s duties were consistent with those held throughout the institution’s history by the University President. Included here are administrative records such as correspondence, reports, publications, budgets and personnel material. Information on Use Access Open for research. No restrictions. Citation When quoting material from this collection, the preferred citation is: University of Chicago. Office of the President. Records, [Box #, Folder #], Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library Historical Note Lawrence A. Kimpton (1910-1977) was raised in Kansas City, Missouri, attended college at Stanford, and completed a Ph.D. in philosophy at Cornell University in 1935.
    [Show full text]