A.C.BRADLEY Ajffd HIS D Ffluefcr Hf Twerl'leth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A.C.BRADLEY Ajffd HIS D Ffluefcr Hf Twerl'leth A.C.BRADLEY AJffD HIS D fF lUEFCR Hf TWERl'lETH UEMTURY SHAEESÎPEARE CRTTIc is m , BY Katharine Lee« Côûjc;^ K. H. 3. L)3 m V CLAub No. Co^ A Ü C. ^ 0, » t, 3it> DAfE ACQ fife, rtbîr. ProQuest Number: 10107236 All rights reserved INF0RMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10107236 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 'L SYNOPSIS. This thesis sets out to discuss the criticism of A.C.Bradley (I85I-I935) paying especial attention to twentieth century interpretationsof his work; which, it appears, hear more CrihcAsm relation to the needs of twentieth century^than to the actual dicta of A.C.Bradley. As twentieth century attitudes are not uniform the Introduction shows some of the contradictory elements in the modern picture of Bradley. Chapter 2 summarises Bradley's life and surveys some of his nwn-literary writings as a corrective to twentieth century impressions. Chapter 3 sets out his critical principles so that the main part of the thesis which follows may he hased on some more factual found­ ation than twentieth century opinion. Chapters, 4,| and 6 examine in some detail the origins and developments of certain pictures of Bradley, the blinkered Victorian, the dry academic theorist and most famously the seeker of 'characters*. These pictures it emerges are not as true to Bradley as the twentieth century would like to believe, mainly because the success of Bradley's work made reaction necessary in order for theme to be proper progress. To balance this general picture of Bradley there follows an enquiry into the ways in which his influence in particular judgments has percolated through later criticism, the example of the ending of King Lear is followed through (in precise detail) to illustrate this. A history of criticism of Bradley (as opposed to mere references to Bradley in Shakespeare criticism) follows this attempt to place the developments traced in the foregoing chapters against a chronological framework, a simplification not possible in the more complex workings of Shakespeare criticism. In conclusion a brief attempt is made to assess Bradley's qualities as a critic which have made him such an influential critic. CONTENTS. Abbreviations 4* Acknowledgements 6. Chaptér It introduction. ?. Chapter 2% Life and Minor Writings. 22. Chapter 3t Critical Principles. ^8. Chapter 4t Bradley the Victorian. 76. Chapter 9# Bradley:Theorising Academic. 106. Chapter 6: "Bradley the Character Chaser” 143. Chapter 7* Bradley as authority. 183. Chapter 6: Bradley’s Critics. 21#. Chapter 9* Conclusion. 2^*^. Bibliography! 275* abbreviations . AaC. üradleys A iAiscellany. A,C.Bradleys "Aristotle'a Conception of the State." E.A, British Academy Annual Shakespeare Lecture. B.B. A.C.Bradley* "Bernard Bosancuet." 0.E. Coll0;^e English. C.L. Comparative Literature. C • Qa Critical Quarterly, CaR. Contemporary Review. C.Sa Critical Survey. B.N.B. Dictionary of National Biography. lainO. Essays in Criticism. EaLaU. ÏÏ.L.H. H.LaQ. Buntingron Library Quarterly. X.JaP. International Journal of Psychiatry. 1.M. A.0.Bradleys "International Lorality." I.R. A. C.Bradey: Ideals of lAligion. «T a A • A a C a Journal of Aeôtiæetic and ^irt Criticism. J.Hal. Journal of the History of Ideas. J.R.LaB. John Hylands Library Bulletin. K.Ra Kenyon R^Dri^w, M.L.R. Modern Language Review. MaPa Modern Philology, N.B. A.C.Bradley* Raturai Religion. O.L.P. A.C.Bradley* Oxford Lectures on Poetry. O.M.M.P. A.C.Bradley* "Old Mythology and Modern Poetry." P.B.A. Proceedings of the British Academy. P.L. A.C.Bradleys Poetry and Life, P * U^a Philological Quarterly. S.A. Shakespeare Association. S# A # x>. Shakespeare Association Bulletin. ABBREVIATIONS contd. S.P* .i.e.Bradley* The Study of Poetry S. Ph. Studies in Philology. S • Snakespeare Quarterly. S.H. Sewanes Review. S. S. Shakespeare Survey. 8b. S. Shakespeare Studies. S.T. A.C.Brsdley* Shakespearean Tragedy. T.É.L. A.C.Bradley* The Teaching of English Literature, A.C.Bradley* Tennyson * s * In Memoriam *. T.L.S. Times Literary Supplement. U.E, The Use of English. U.P. I.e.Bradley* The Uses of Poetry. The derbpils of the works of M.C.Bradley are given in the Bibliography. ù AüimiQVii.ài,ciàai's. The letters of A.C#Bradley to Gilbert Murray and his wife, Lady Mary have been invaluable to me in coming to some understanding of the man Bradley was. To Kr. E.V.Quinn the librarian of Balliol College, Oxford who told me of them, to the late Mrs, 1, Henderson for permission to read the letters I wish to record my gratitude. Thanks are due to Mr. Quinn also for help in finding what material there was at Balliol (including a lecture elsewhere undiscovered "The Teaching of English" and an undergraduate article by Bradley "Mr. Bosetti's Shelley") ana suggesting useful biographies of Bradley's contemporaries, aud to Mr. r.F.Cook of The University Library, Liverpool and Miss E.G.Jack of The Library, University of Glasgow for their assistance. CHAPTER 1 t INTRODUCTION. Literary fashion has been more than usually capricious in its handling of A.C.Bradley, so that any short summary of his position in twentieth century criticism is certain to distort the facts. It is not sufficient to classify him with other literary and critical idols turned Aunt Sally, although there is enough evidence for this view; he was clearly not a critic maligned in his time and only appreciated generations later, although there is more evidence for this view than appears at first sight. His influence is not widespread enough for him to be truly seen as a major figure in twentieth century literature although his name has become part of the jargon of criticism in a way which no other critical name of the century has paralleled. It is possible to mention his name to students of English and receive in return a cold stare and it is difficult to find a work of Shakespearian criticism which omits some reference to his name. In his essay on "The Reaction against Tennyson** (first delivered in 1914 but first published in A Miscellany in 192^ Bradley himself remarked on the role which *the wholesome work of reaction* had to play in establishing that which he considered most important in literature, a way to the poet's mind. He wrote* "The reaction against Tennyson is not,on the whole,a matter for regret. It was necessary, for one thing, in the interests of poetry itself. For the formal characteristics of his style were easily caught, and Tennysonian minor poetry, if less abssrd than Byronio minor poetry, was quite as sickening." (l) Remembering what J#I.M.Stewart called "Bradley-sndHwater- crities" (2) this seems a strangely apposite commentary on Bradley's position. What underlies it is almost a commonplace of Grit 1sal histories. In an article in the catalogue to the recent Roger Pry exhibition, Quentin Bell wrote of the viciss­ itudes of fashiont lii.- ri. C. library "in the case of a critic, the descending curve of popular favour is likely to he particularly abrupt* His real and permanent achievements become commonplace while his mistakes form a natural, and indeed a #@ry proper target, for the younger men whose business it is to correct the errors of their predecessors*" (3) and Merritt Y. Hughes in an article "A Meditation o© Literary Blasphemy" vkloh went on to deal at length with the effect of P.R.Leavis on the value of Bradley's criticism, summed the matter up in two short sentences; "Literary iconoclasm is the final remedy for literary superstition" and "Blasphemous impulses are part of the instinct for self preservation*" (4 ) What has been peculiar about the treatment of Bradley in this 'sifting process' as he himself called it, is the half- heartedness with which it has been carried on in published works and the fervour with which it has been taken up by the general reader* The best indication that the time for rehabili­ tation has come is not the amount of more recent criticism which acknowledges d debt to Bradley, but the issue of his two most important works Oxford Lectures on Poetry and Shakespearean Tragedy in paperbacks, both in this coimtry and in America* In some ways the familiar pattern is further complicated by the faot that Bradley's work was received by converts. Reviewing Shakespearean Tragedy The Times Literary Supplement wrote: "Mr. Bradley had hardly begun his lectures before the echo of his voice made itnelf heard beyond the academic boundaries." and described the lectures as: "making a very unusual impression in Oxford and those who had not the chance of hearing them looked forward with eagerness to their publication." (5) It is perhaps small wonder that the work of reaction sets in immediately, most notably in A*B*Walkley's article also in The Times Literary Supplement less than two months after the original review* The article, later reprinted in Drama and Life, is suitably respectful but iconoclasm had clearly set in* "Let me not be thought to undervalue the really important part of Mr.
Recommended publications
  • The Rhinehart Collection Rhinehart The
    The The Rhinehart Collection Spine width: 0.297 inches Adjust as needed The Rhinehart Collection at appalachian state university at appalachian state university appalachian state at An Annotated Bibliography Volume II John higby Vol. II boone, north carolina John John h igby The Rhinehart Collection i Bill and Maureen Rhinehart in their library at home. ii The Rhinehart Collection at appalachian state university An Annotated Bibliography Volume II John Higby Carol Grotnes Belk Library Appalachian State University Boone, North Carolina 2011 iii International Standard Book Number: 0-000-00000-0 Library of Congress Catalog Number: 0-00000 Carol Grotnes Belk Library, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608 © 2011 by Appalachian State University. All rights reserved. First Edition published 2011 Designed and typeset by Ed Gaither, Office of Printing and Publications. The text face and ornaments are Adobe Caslon, a revival by designer Carol Twombly of typefaces created by English printer William Caslon in the 18th century. The decorative initials are Zallman Caps. The paper is Carnival Smooth from Smart Papers. It is of archival quality, acid-free and pH neutral. printed in the united states of america iv Foreword he books annotated in this catalogue might be regarded as forming an entity called Rhinehart II, a further gift of material embodying British T history, literature, and culture that the Rhineharts have chosen to add to the collection already sheltered in Belk Library. The books of present concern, diverse in their
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00489-4 - The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Updated Edition Edited by Kurt Schlueter Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE general editor Brian Gibbons associate general editor A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood. From 1990 to 1994 the General Editor was Brian Gibbons and the Associate General Editors were A. R. Braunmuller and Robin Hood. THE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA Professor Schlueter approaches this early comedy as a parody of two types of Renaissance educational fiction: the love-quest story and the test-of-friendship story, which by their combination show high-flown human ideals as incompatible with each other, and with human nature. A thoroughly researched, illustrated stage history reveals changing conceptions of the play, which nevertheless often fail to come to terms with its subversive impetus. Since the first known production at David Garrick’s Drury Lane Theatre, it has tempted major directors and actors, including John Philip Kemble, William Charles Macready and Charles Kean, who established a tradition of understanding which cast its shadow even on such modern productions as Denis Carey’s famous staging for the Bristol Old Vic and Robin Phillips’s for the Royal Shakespeare Company. This updated edition includes a new introductory section by Lucy Munro on recent stage
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANTIC CRITICISM of SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By
    ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By JOHN g,RAWFORD Associate of Arts Texarkana College Texarkana, Texas 1956 Bachelor of Science in Education Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia, Arkansas 1959 Master of Science in Education Drake University Des Moines, Iowa 1962 Submitted to the faculty of .the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May, 1968 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OCT 24 1968 ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser \ f ,A .. < \ Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to· thank anumber·of people who helped me in many different ways during· the·preparation· of .this dissertation, notably Dr. David· S. Berkeley,·major adviser, who-lent words of encouragement, guidance, understanding, and patience; but also my committee members, Dr. Darrel Ray·, Pr~ Judson Milburn, and· .Dr~- Loyd Douglas; and. the Oklahoma State University library staff, especially Miss Helen Donart and Mrs • .:fosephine Monk. iii TABLE-OF CONTENTS Chap tel' Page. I. INTRODUCTION •••• 1 II. HAMLET .••• . ' . .. ... 29 III. ANTONY -~ CLEOPATRA • • • • . • • . • • • It • . • • . • .• • a1 ·IV. HENRYV· . ,. ". .• . 122 V. THE· MERCHANT ·QE. VENICE .- . "' . 153 VI. CONCLUSION • • ' . -. ,. 187 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • · • . .. 191 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Of all the so-called schools of Shakespearian criticism, the Romantic has been and continues to be one of the most influential. Per- haps this is true merely because of the impor~ance which the Romantic School places upon the genius of the subj~ct, for all schools of criti- cism recognize Shakespeare's ability at creating effective drama. A more accurate answer, however, probably lies in the fact that "romanti- cism" has a broad base and encompasses so very much.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Kemp, Shakespeare, and the Composition of Romeo and Juliet
    162 Issues in Review 43 See A.J. Hoenselaars, Images of Englishmen and Foreigners in the Drama of Shake- speare and His Contemporaries: A Study in Stage Characters and National Identity in English Renaissance Drama (London and Toronto, 1992). 44 G.K. Hunter, ‘Porter, Henry (d. 1599)’, The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004) http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/22568 (accessed 21 Dec 2006). 45 Henslowe’s Diary, 63, 242–3. 46 See Hunter, ‘Porter, Henry’. 47 Lucy Munro, ‘Early Modern Drama and the Repertory Approach’, Research Oppor- tunities in Renaissance Drama 42 (2003), 1–33. Will Kemp, Shakespeare, and the Composition of Romeo and Juliet ‘Enter Will Kemp’, states Romeo and Juliet’s 1599 second quarto in its uniquely specific stage direction towards the end of scene 17.1 This uniqueness makes the quarto, which editors know as Q2, a crucially important witness to the play’s early performances, and to Kemp’s career with Shakespeare and the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The Romeo and Juliet quartos, however, contain a number of other curious references to Kemp which act as further evidence of the working relationship between the dramatist and his company’s star clown. A comparison of the play’s two earliest quartos, Q1 of 1597 and Q2 of 1599, shows the clown role to be both malleable and formative in the work’s ongoing generic development. A study of Kemp in the play, through the textual anomalies which separate the printed quartos, thus provides a record of some of the transformations Romeo and Juliet underwent during the first years of its existence, as the company corrected, revised, abridged, and changed the scripts in order to capitalize on and contain the famous clown’s distinctive talents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diet for a Sensitive Soul: Vegetarianism in Eighteenth-Century Britain
    A Diet for a Sensitive Soul: Vegetarianism in Eighteenth-Century Britain Anita Guerrini While vegetarianism has a long history in Western culture, it reemerged forcefully in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain. Three main motivations for vegetarianism converged in this period: religious, medical, and moral. In addition, a vegetarian diet entered mainstream medical and popular thought in the works of the physician George Cheyne. By the time of Joseph Ritson's Essay on Abstinence from Animal Food in 1802, however, vegetarianism was about to rejoin the irrational fringe, exemplified in the nineteenth century by Sylvester Graham and his followers. 1 In this essay, I shall focus on three vegetarians of the period: the radical hatter Thomas Tryon (1634-1703), George Cheyne (1671-1743), and the man of letters Joseph Ritson (1752-1803). Cheyne's work, especially his Essay of Health and Long Life (1724) and The English Malady (1733), defined the nascent concept of the sensitive character and explicitly connected it to diet and lifestyle. To Cheyne, a vegetarian diet was preeminently a diet for the sensitive soul. Over the century, the sensitive soul negotiated a path from the overtly religious Tryon to the covertly religious Cheyne to the professedly antireligious Ritson. To each, in addition, vegetarianism was part of a wider critique of contemporary society. Tryon was one of a number of religiously motivated vegetarians in the period following the English Civil War. 2 The context of his ideas can be delineated by examining an earlier
    [Show full text]
  • British Renaissance Poets
    Critical Survey of Poetry British Renaissance Poets Editor Rosemary M. Canfield Reisman Charleston Southern University Salem Press A Division of EBSCO Publishing, Ipswich, Massachusetts Cover photo: Sir Walter Ralegh (© PoodlesRock/Corbis) Copyright © 2012, by Salem Press, A Division of EBSCO Publishing, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or me- chanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews or in the copying of images deemed to be freely licensed or in the public domain. For information address the publisher, Sa- lem Press, at [email protected]. ISBN: 978-1-58765-908-9 pod ISBN: 978-1-42983-657-1 CONTENTS Contributors . iv English Poetry in the Sixteenth Century . 1 English Poetry in the Seventeenth Century. 20 Thomas Campion . 43 Thomas Carew. 53 George Chapman . 61 Abraham Cowley . 72 Richard Crashaw . 83 Thomas Dekker . 93 John Donne. 104 George Herbert. 123 Ben Jonson . 135 Christopher Marlowe. 148 Andrew Marvell . 157 Thomas Nashe . 169 Sir Walter Ralegh. 177 William Shakespeare. 188 Sir Philip Sidney . 200 Robert Southwell. 214 Edmund Spenser . 222 Henry Howard, earl of Surrey . 237 Henry Vaughan. 246 Checklist for Explicating a Poem . 255 Bibliography . 258 Category Index . 265 Subject Index. 268 iii CONTRIBUTORS Rosemary Ascherl Sidney Gottlieb Robert M. Otten Colchester, Connecticut Sacred Heart University Marymount University Elizabeth J. Bellamy Katherine Hanley Samuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Texts from De.Wikipedia.Org, De.Wikisource.Org
    Texts from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13635/13635-h/13635-h.htm, de.wikipedia.org, de.wikisource.org BRITISH AND GERMAN AUTHORS AND Contents: INTELLECTUALS CONFRONT EACH OTHER IN 1914 1. British authors defend England’s war (17 September) The material here collected consists of altercations between British and German men of letters and professors in the first 2. Appeal of the 93 German professors “to the world of months of the First World War. Remarkably they present culture” (4 October 1914) themselves as collective bodies and as an authoritative voice on — 2a. German version behalf of their nation. — 2b. English version The English-language materials given here were published in, 3. Declaration of the German university professors (16 and have been quoted from, The New York Times Current October 1914) History: A Monthly Magazine ("The European War", vol. 1: — 3a. German version "From the beginning to March 1915"; New York: The New — 3b. English version York Times Company 1915), online on Project Gutenberg (www.gutenberg.org). That same source also contains many 4. Reply to the German professors, by British scholars interventions written à titre personnel by individuals, including (21 October 1914) G.B. Shaw, H.G. Wells, Arnold Bennett, John Galsworthy, Jerome K. Jerome, Rudyard Kipling, G.K. Chesterton, H. Rider Haggard, Robert Bridges, Arthur Conan Doyle, Maurice Maeterlinck, Henri Bergson, Romain Rolland, Gerhart Hauptmann and Adolf von Harnack (whose open letter "to Americans in Germany" provoked a response signed by 11 British theologians). The German texts given here here can be found, with backgrounds, further references and more precise datings, in the German wikipedia article "Manifest der 93" and the German wikisource article “Erklärung der Hochschullehrer des Deutschen Reiches” (in a version dated 23 October 1914, with French parallel translation, along with the names of all 3000 signatories).
    [Show full text]
  • Ashhurst, Sir William Henry (1725–1807)
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 2004 Biography: Ashhurst, Sir William Henry (1725–1807) Douglas Hay Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Source Publication: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2004. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works Part of the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Hay, Douglas C. "Ashhurst, Sir William Henry (1725–1807)." Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Eds. Leslie Stephen, Sidney Lee, and Christine Nicholls. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Ashhurst, Sir William Henry (1725–1807),judge by Douglas Hay © Oxford University Press 2004–15 All rights reserved Ashhurst, Sir William Henry (1725–1807), judge, was born on 25 January 1725 at Ashhurst, near Wigan, Lancashire, the third son of Thomas Henry Ashhurst (d. 1744), vice-chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster and recorder of Liverpool and Wigan, who held the Lancashire manors of Dalton, Upholland, and Skelmersdale, and his wife Diana (d. 1786); she was the daughter of Sir Richard Allin, baronet, of Somerleyton, Suffolk, and his wife, Frances Ashurst, and thereby the granddaughter of Sir Henry Ashurst, first baronet (1645–1711). Henry's father was a younger son of Henry Ashurst of Dalton; William Henry's parents were therefore distant cousins. Diana Allin was heir to Sir Henry Ashurst's estates at Waterstock and Emmington, Oxfordshire, which Ashhurst inherited in 1788; his older brother Henry sold the Lancashire estates in 1751.
    [Show full text]
  • “How the Chicken Conquered the World,” Smithsonian Magazine, June 2012
    Bibliography General Sources Adler, Jerry, and Andrew Lawler, “How the Chicken Conquered the World,” Smithsonian Magazine, June 2012. Damerow, Gail. The Chicken Encyclopedia: An Illustrated Reference. Pownal, VT: Storey, 2012. Danaan, Clea. The Way of the Hen: Zen and the Art of Raising Chickens. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press, 2011. Fraser, Evan D. G., and Andrew Rimas. Empires of Food: Feast, Famine, and the Rise and Fall of Civilizations. New York: Free Press, 2010. Gurdon, Martin. Hen and the Art of Chicken Maintenance: Reflections on Keeping Chickens. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press, 2004. Lembke, Janet. Chickens: Their Natural and Unnatural Histories. New York, NY: Skyhorse Pub., 2012. Litt, Robert, and Hannah Litt. A Chicken in Every Yard: The Urban Farm Store's Guide to Chicken Keeping. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 2011. Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin Press, 2006. Potts, Annie. Chicken. London: Reaktion Books, 2012. Serjeantson, D. Birds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Smith, Jane S. In Praise of Chickens: A Compendium of Wisdom Fair and Fowl. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press, 2012. Smith, Page, and Charles Daniel. The Chicken Book. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975. Squier, Susan Merrill. Poultry Science, Chicken Culture: A Partial Alphabet. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011. Troller, Susan, S. V. Medaris, Jane Hamilton, Michael Perry, and Ben Logan. Cluck: From Jungle Fowl to City Chicks. Blue Mounds, WI: Itchy Cat Press, 2011. Willis, Kimberley, and Rob Ludlow. Raising Chickens for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2009. Introduction Booth, William. "The Great Egg Crisis Hits Mexico." Washington Post.
    [Show full text]
  • BARDGATE Was Shakespeare a Secret Catholic?
    BARDGATE Was Shakespeare a Secret Catholic? Peter W. Dickson ❦ ANY persons comfortable in the modern tolerant secular culture may recoil from the idea that the genius behind the works attributed to William Shakespeare could be found in his religious orientation, a growing suspicion among scholars who sense that the man from Stratford-on-Avon might have been living a “double life” as a secret Roman Catholic. This discussion about whether the Bard remained inwardly a Catholic while Queen Elizabeth and her regime sought the suppression and execution of large numbers of Catholics (especially after 1581) was until recently confined to the quiet groves of academe. Those scholars of Shakespeare’s works aware of this history (not all are!) usually consider the old Catholic/Protestant argument as too unsavory a topic and are probably happy with the possibility that it may now be too esoteric for a broader audience. The disinclination to probe into the religious issues of the time meshes well with the mania known as “multiculturalism” or the politics of “diversity” which holds that personal identity should be understood in terms of differences arising from physical characteristics––race, gender or sexual orientation––as opposed to what is inside one’s mind. At the same time, these new cultural trends have fueled an egalitarian spirit that encourages the leveling down or unmasking of persons who have served as symbols of greatness in the past. The Bard in this regard has not been spared clini- cal dissection by deconstructionists, feminists, historicists and the like. This new iconoclasm encourages scholars to ask whether he might have been a racist or a sexist toward women as well as being perhaps an anti-Semite, given his portrayal of Shylock in The Merchant of Venice.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} an Inquiry the Nature and Progress Rent, Progress of Which It Is Regulated, Vol
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} An Inquiry the Nature and Progress Rent, Progress of Which It Is Regulated, Vol. 7 (Classic Reprint) by Il Malthus R. Malthus Malthus, Thomas Robert. An Inquiry into the Nature and Progress of Rent, and the Principles by which it is Regulated. London: John Murray, Albermarle Street. [A Reprint of Economic Tracts, Edited by Jacob H. Hollander, Johns Hopkins Press, 1903] Repository: University of California. Malthus… Oct 31, 2017 · Malthus, T. R. (1815a). An Inquiry into the Nature and Progress of Rent and the Principles by Which It Is regulated.Author: Yuichiro KawanaPublish Year: 2018[PDF]GENERAL RULES - Home | FEMA.govhttps://www.fema.gov/pdf/nfip/prodmanual200510/03gr.pdffoundation, that is regulated under the community’s floodplain management and building ordinances or laws. NOTE: All references in this manual to manufactured (mobile) homes include tra-vel trailers without wheels. a. Manufactured (Mobile) Homes - New Policies Effective on or After October 1, 1982 To be insurable under the NFIP, a mobile home: Thomas Robert Malthus FRS (/ ˈ m æ l θ ə s /; 13/14 February 1766 – 23 December 1834) was an English cleric, scholar and influential economist in the fields of political economy and demography.. In his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus …Born: 13/14 February 1766, Westcott, Surrey, EnglandChildren: 3Died: 23 December 1834 (aged 68), Bath, …Spouse(s): Harriet Eckersall ​(m. 1804)​ Chapter 1 NR222 Flashcards | Quizlethttps://quizlet.com/414754585/chapter-1-nr222-flash-cardsStart studying Chapter 1 NR222. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Athenaeum Press Series
    THE ATHENAEUM PRESS SERIES G. L. KITTREDGE AND C. T. WINCHESTER GENERAL EDITORS Series announcement THE "Athenaeum Press Series" includes the choicest works of Eng­ lish literature in editions carefully prepared for the use of schools, col­ leges, libraries, and the general reader. Each volume is edited by some scholar who has made a special study of an author and his period. The Introductions are biographical and critical. In particular they set forth the relation of the authors to their times and indicate their impor­ tance in the development of litera­ ture. A Bibliography and Notes accompany each volume. Athenaeum Press Series THE SONNETS OF SHAKESPEARE WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY H. C. BEECHING, M.A., D. LITT. BOSTON, U.S.A., AND LONDON GINN & COMPANY, PUBLISHERS 1904 ENTERED AT STATIONERS' HALL COPYRIGHT, 1904 BY H. C. BEECHING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IV V7^ O AMICIS BALLIOLENSIBVS ANDREAE CECILIO BRADLEY SIDNEIO LEE DE POETA NOSTRO BENE MERENTISSIMIS QVORVM FAVOR HVNC LIBELLVM VNICE PRODVXIT GENITOR 4~ CO (^ 195527 PREFACE This edition of Shakespeare's sonnets was suggested by my friend Mr. A. C. Bradley, Professor of Poetry at Oxford, who was interested in a paper on the subject which I con­ tributed to the Cornhill Magazine in February, 1902. That paper, by the good leave of the publisher, I have used as the basis of the present Introduction ; and the rest of my editorial work has consisted in dividing up the sonnets into groups and annotating them. As there are already before the public not a few editions of Shakespeare's son­ nets by well-known writers, I may be allowed to set out what I conceive to be the peculiarities of this edition.
    [Show full text]