Textile Collection Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Textile Collection Guide TEXTILE COLLECTION GUIDE A guide for local authorities and textile collectors. Updated: April 2016 Home 1.0 2.0 Policy 3.0 Choosing 4.0 Kerbside 5.0 Bring 6.0 Community 7.0 Bulky 8.0 Promoting 9.0 Monitoring 10.0 Glossary 11.0 Further Understanding context the right & door-to-door banks re-use non-clothing textile re-use & evaluation information textile re-use methods collections textiles & recycling Guide WRAP – Textile Guidance – April 2016 WRAP’s vision is a world in which About SCAP This guidance has been developed by WRAP as part of its work on the Sustainable resources are used sustainably. Clothing Action Plan (SCAP). SCAP’s ambition is to improve the sustainability of clothing across its life cycle. By bringing together industry, government and the third sector SCAP aims to reduce resource use and secure recognition for corporate WRAP’s mission is to accelerate performance by developing sector-wide targets. the move to a sustainable, Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their assistance in the course of this resource-efficient economy through: project: Alan Arrowsmith, JMP Wilcox; Cristina Osoro Cangas, Charity Retail Association; re-inventing how we design, Emma Cheesman, Cory Environmental Municipal Services Ltd; Maria Challenger, Torfaen County Borough Council; Ted Childs, Bag to School; Gemma Clinton, East produce and sell products. Dorset District Council and LARAC; Andrea Cornwell, London Borough (LB) of Bexley; Edward Cowley, Cambridgeshire County Council; Sarah Ellis, West London Waste Authority; Dean Evans, Joint Procurement Unit (Newport City Council); re-thinking how we use Phil Geller, I&G Cohen; Rachel Gray, WRAP; Jon Hastings, London Borough (LB) of Newham ; Andy Haws, ERC/SOEX; Lindsey Hill, Wastesavers Charitable Trust and consume products. Limited; James Kay, Resource Efficiency Wales; Joe Kingston, City of London Corporation; Kornelia Korzec, Cambridgeshire County Council; Michael Lomotey, Clothes Aid; John Matthews, London Borough (LB) of Bexley; Greg McMorris, re-defining what is possible Nathans Wastesavers Ltd; John Miley, Broxtowe Borough Council and NALEO; Roger Mills, Torfaen County Borough Council; Paul Ozanne, Salvation Army Trading Company; Dimitra Rappou, North London Waste Authority; Sally Sheward, Staffordshire County Council and LARAC; Lyndsey Stewart, Newport City Council; Helen Taylor, Cambridgeshire County Council; Jason Taylor CHAD Containers; Paul Terry, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council; Miranda Valenzuela, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council; Mike Webster, TRAID; West Midlands Waste and Recycling Forum; Penny Williams, Wastesavers Charitable Trust Limited; Alan Wheeler, Textiles Recycling Association; Andy Wilkinson Conwy County Borough Council, Rob Cole Suffolk Waste Partnership. Home 1.0 2.0 Policy 3.0 Choosing 4.0 Kerbside 5.0 Bring 6.0 Community 7.0 Bulky 8.0 Promoting 9.0 Monitoring 10.0 Glossary 11.0 Further Understanding context the right & door-to-door banks re-use non-clothing textile re-use & evaluation information textile re-use methods collections textiles & recycling Guide page 2 WRAP – Textile Guidance – April 2016 ABOUT THIS GUIDANCE This document is designed to help local authorities (LA) and textiles collectors such It is not intended to be prescriptive but is a guide to the issues to consider and the as charities, waste management companies and textile merchants increase textile options available individually or as a partnership in relation to the collection of re-use and recycling and reduce the amount of textiles being disposed of in residual textiles for re-use. waste. It provides practical guidance and examples of existing good practice for three key routes: This guide is designed such that readers can go straight to the sections of interest. Appropriate cross-referencing of sections is provided throughout the document. It kerbside textile collection services; has been designed to be read online but is also suitable for printing. bring banks; and community re-use initiatives. Key terms used in the guidance It gives guidance on how to communicate textile re-use and recycling services to the Textiles – in the context of this guidance, the term “textiles” includes not only public. clothing and shoes, but also bedding and curtains (though not carpets and mattresses). It can be used to help put in place new arrangements, review the existing approach, Bulky Non-Clothing Textiles – carpets, mattresses, pillows and duvets. or further develop and promote existing services. The guidance covers how to select Although these are not the focus of this guide, see Section 7 for a summary the right mix of services, how to commission services and, how to work with partners of our findings to date. and stakeholders, such as charities and community groups. Re-use – textile re-use is when textiles are sold or passed on as second-hand clothing, whether in the UK or overseas. For simplicity and because many services collect items for both re-use and recycling Recycling – recycling is where certain grades and types of textiles are the term re-use is used where both re-use and recycling occur. pulled and converted into other materials, such as felts, by specialist textile reprocessors. The guide is produced by WRAP as part of its work on the UK’s Sustainable Clothing Action Plan (SCAP), and covers England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. It has been developed in close collaboration with the SCAP Re-use and Recycling Task Group. Although the main focus of this guide is household textiles it does include a section on bulky non-clothing textiles such as carpets, mattresses, pillows and duvets. Bulky non-clothing textiles can also be collected for re-use and recycling. For further information see Section 7.0 Bulky non-clothing textiles Home 1.0 2.0 Policy 3.0 Choosing 4.0 Kerbside 5.0 Bring 6.0 Community 7.0 Bulky 8.0 Promoting 9.0 Monitoring 10.0 Glossary 11.0 Further Understanding context the right & door-to-door banks re-use non-clothing textile re-use & evaluation information textile re-use methods collections textiles & recycling Guide page 3 WRAP – Textile Guidance – April 2016 1.0 UNDERSTANDING TEXTILE RE-USE AND RECYCLING provide employment and volunteering opportunities – there is a net employment Overview benefit in the UK of dealing with all clothing that reaches the end of its life3, as well as a significant boost to volunteering: on average, each charity shop has This section provides an overview of what textile re-use is and why it matters. over 20 volunteers (over 180,000 for the sector as a whole)4. It summarises the main routes to re-use and their respective benefits and considerations, and explains how textiles can be re-used. Given these benefits, it’s no surprise that textiles are becoming a key target material. Textile re-use: the benefits to local authorities 1.1 Textile re-use and why it matters By increasing the amount of textiles that are re-used, local authorities can: Every year, just under one million tonnes of all types of textiles goes to landfill. reduce their waste disposal costs; generate income; However, there are a number of opportunities to reduce this amount and a number support local charities or community groups; and of potential benefits in doing so. Increasing textile re-use can: create employment opportunities. significantly reduce carbon emissions from clothing manufacture – the carbon impact of re-used items of clothing such as T-shirts and jumpers is far lower than new equivalents1; cut the amount of landfill tax and other waste management and disposal costs local authorities have to pay – An estimated £140 million (350,000 tonnnes) worth of used clothes goes to landfill in the UK every year. 135,200 tonnes of textiles were collected in 2011/12 by local authorities for re-use and recycling which equates to just over £7.5 million of landfill tax avoided (at £56/tonne)2; generate revenues – each T-shirt/jumper re-used can yield over £1 net revenue to re-use organisations (e.g. charities) and/or to government (discounting wider costs or losses to householders, offices or businesses); and help households save money – if more items are available for re-use, people will have greater choice so can avoid purchasing (more expensive) new items; 1 WRAP, Textile Flows and Market Opportunities (2012) 3 WRAP, Benefits of Re-use Case Study: Clothing (2011) 2 WRAP, Valuing our Clothes (2012) 4 Key facts about charity shops, Charity Retail Association 2011 1.0 Home Understanding textile re-use 2.0 Policy 3.0 Choosing 4.0 Kerbside 5.0 Bring 6.0 Community 7.0 Bulky 8.0 Promoting 9.0 Monitoring 10.0 Glossary 11.0 Further context the right & door-to-door banks re-use non-clothing textile re-use & evaluation information methods collections textiles & recycling Guide page 4 WRAP – Textile Guidance – April 2016 1.2 What options are there for collecting and donating textiles? There are essentially three main routes: 1. Kerbside collection services – where households are asked to gather textiles for re-use, and leave them for collection at the kerbside. These services can be run either by a local authority – as part of their overall kerbside recycling service – or by charities or commercial collectors. 2. Bring banks –often in public spaces such as car parks of village halls or community centres, or household waste recycling centres (HWRC). These can be provided either by the local authority itself, charity or community organisations or commercial collectors. 3. Community re-use initiatives – this covers a wide range
Recommended publications
  • EPSM2009-1145 WYG Environment Transport
    Ref Ecologist Name & Address Applicants Name & Address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Philip Boniface, Condover Quarry, Condover, EPSM2009-1145 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Shrewsbuy, SY5 7AR. Condover Quarry Condover Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 7AR Willenhall WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Ian Merrill, Severn Trent Water, PO Box 51, Sewage EPSM2009-1169 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Raynesway, Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 7JA Treatment Works Off Anson Road Willenhall West Midlands WS2 0DH Halcrow Group Ltd, Griffin House, 135 High Street, Mr J Beechey, South East Water, Rochfort Road, Kippings Cross to EPSM2009-1174 Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 1DQ Snodland, Kent, ME6 5AH Pembury Kent The National Trust, Mr Stuart Crow, Tattershall, Tattersfield EPSM2009-1181 Lincolnshire, LN4 4LR Castle Sleaford Tattersfield Lincolnshire LN4 4LR InterRoute, Ms Emma Fisher, InterRoute Area 2, 910 Highways Authority, InterRoute Ms A Roberts, Hempton Court, Aztec West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 InterRoute Area 2, 910 Hempton Court, Aztec Summerlands M4 Marker Post EPSM2009-1184 4SR. West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SR. Access Bridge 148/8 Wiltshire Mr James Mitchell, Wessex Water, Claverton Down, Bath, Mr Steve Lanzon, Wessex Water, Claverton Land to the West EPSM2009-1185 BA2 7WW Down, Bath, BA2 7WW Swallet Gate Dauntsey of Swallet Gate Dauntsey Wiltshire Theakston Estates Mr Martin Corney, Elston Hall, Windlestone
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offsetting
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 81 | September 2013 Biodiversity Offsetting In this issue Offsetting and the Repeatability of David Stubbs Awarded Planning System Vegetation Mapping the Institute Medal Welcome Information Biodiversity Needs Powerful Narratives, In Practice No. 81, September 2013 Good Stories and the Right Words ISSN 1754-4882 The recent State of Nature report by 25 conservation and research organisations demonstrates Editor the ongoing losses of biodiversity in the UK. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 has a target Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services by 2020. Three key things are needed to stop the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystems. Editorial Board 1. A Deliverable Vision and Mechanisms to Deliver the Vision Mr Jonathan Barnes, Mr Matthew Chatfi eld, The overall vision and strategy is John Lawton’s Making Space for Nature report. This recognises Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, the importance of ecosystem services and sets out the future as needing to be coherent and Ms Sally Hayns, Dr William Latimer, made up of resilient ecological networks and More, Bigger, Better and Joined-up sites. Green Mrs Allison Potts, Mr Paul Rooney, and blue infrastructure is a fundamental part of these ecological networks that intersperse and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, join up villages, towns and cities. Miss Emma Toovey, Mr Darren Towers The Landscape Institute (LI) has recently revised its Green Infrastructure position statement. Green and blue infrastructure was the subject of the extremely successful joint CIEEM-LI Opinions expressed by contributors conference in Birmingham in early July.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Recording Our Decision-Making Process
    Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Including BATc Additions. Jan 2020 Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Consultation on our decision document recording our decision-making process The Permit Number is: EPR/GP3535QS The Applicant / Operator is: Cory Environmental Holdings Ltd. The Installation is located at: Riverside Energy Park. Norman Road North Belvedere London DA17 6JY What this document is about This is a decision document, which accompanies a permit. It explains how we have considered the Applicant’s Application, and why we have included the specific conditions in the draft permit we are proposing to issue to the Applicant. It is our record of our decision-making process, to show how we have taken into account all relevant factors in reaching our position. Unless the document explains otherwise, we have accepted the Applicant’s proposals. We try to explain our decision as accurately, comprehensively and plainly as possible. Achieving all three objectives is not always easy, and we would welcome any feedback as to how we might improve our decision documents in future. A lot of technical terms and acronyms are inevitable in a document of this nature: we provide a glossary of acronyms near the front of the document, for ease of reference. Issued 17/07/2020 Page 1 of 147 EPR/GP3535QS/A001 Preliminary information and use of terms We gave the application the reference number EPR/GP3535QS/A001. We refer to the application as “the Application” in this document in order to be consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom
    This is to certify that the Environmental Management System of: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom (Central function listed above. See appendix for additional locations) applicable to: The provision of waste management services has been assessed and registered by NQA against the provisions of: ISO 14001:2015 This registration is subject to the company maintaining an environmental management system, to the above standard, which will be monitored by NQA Certificate No. 69746 ISO Approval Date: 21 March 2013 Reissued: 24 July 2018 Valid Until: 24 July 2021 FManaging Director EAC Code: 24, 39 Page 1 of 4 The use of the UKAS Accreditation Mark indicates accreditation in respect of those activities covered by the accreditation certificate number 015 held by NQA. NQA is a trading name of NQA Certification Limited, Registration No. 09351758. Registered Office: Warwick House, Houghton Hall Park, Houghton Regis, Dunstable Bedfordshire LU5 5ZX, United Kingdom. This certificate is the property of NQA and must be returned on request. Appendix to Certificate Number 69746 Includes Facilities Located at: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69746 Head Office 2 Coldbath Square London EC1R 5HL United Kingdom Cory Environmental Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69746/2 Walbrook Transfer Station, Corporation of London Contract Upper Thames Street, London EC4R 3TD United Kingdom Cory Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames Mayor of London 1
    London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames London Plan Implementation Report January 2005 Cover photo stories: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 JJ Prior delivering aggregates to RMC Fulham (Comley’s Wharf). The aggregates, sand and gravel, originate from Prior’s quarry at Fingringhoe on the River Colne near Colchester. Prior owns seven aggregate vessels ranging in size from 250 to 600 tonne cargo carrying capacity. The vessels load directly from the quarry and delivery direct to upriver aggregates facilities, carrying approximately 160,000 tonnes per year. These small ships make a huge contribution to keeping heavy lorries off London’s streets. In recognition of this, the company has received several Freight Facilities Grants towards the cost of vessel refurbishment. 2 A panorama of two safeguarded Wandsworth terminals: Cringle Dock, a waste transfer station owned by the Western Riverside Waste Authority and operated by Cory Environmental; and RMC Battersea, owned and operated as a concrete batching plant by RMC. These two berths primarily handle cargo that has been transhipped within the Port of London, sea-dredged aggregates and cement arriving at RMC Battersea from terminals in Greenwich, Northfleet and Greenhithe and household waste barged from Cringle Dock to Mucking in Essex. In 2001, over 375,000 tonnes of cargo was handled at these two terminals, which kept over 51,000 lorry movements of the capital’s streets. 3 A Cory Environmental owned tug pulling a pair of dumb barges upstream through Lambeth Bridge carrying empty containers for loading with household waste at two safeguarded water transfer stations in Wandsworth (Western Riverside Waste Transfer Station and Cringle Dock).
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly List of All Environmental Bodies Enrolled with ENTRUST
    Monthly list of all Environmental Bodies enrolled with ENTRUST Correct as of 31 January 2015 EB Environmental Body EB location Date no. enrolled 328317 Strathmiglo Park Group Fife 28/01/2015 134353 Little Hinton Village Hall Trust Wiltshire 28/01/2015 370124 BACUP CRICKET CLUB Lancashire 28/01/2015 451403 Newtown Cricket Club Powys 23/01/2015 319747 Clydesdale Community Initiatives South Lanarkshire 21/01/2015 802040 Standbridge Lane Community Development Trust West Yorkshire 21/01/2015 929273 Witham Hill Gymnastics Club Lincolnshire 20/01/2015 185180 Halkyn Cricket Club Flintshire 19/01/2015 935470 Spey Bay Hall and Amenities Association Moray 16/01/2015 478817 Ellesmere Rangers Football Club Shropshire 14/01/2015 441302 The Friends of Bodymoor Heath Victory Hall Warwickshire 13/01/2015 554417 Wymeswold Cricket Club Leicestershire 23/12/2014 303928 Covesea Lighthouse Community Company Limited Moray 22/12/2014 950676 Hartlebury Castle Preservation Trust Worcestershire 18/12/2014 426937 The Pelham CIO East Sussex 18/12/2014 826662 Friends of Montgomery Street Park Midlothian 18/12/2014 552516 Barrow Gurney Village hall Somerset 18/12/2014 349756 Holne Playpark Charity Devon 17/12/2014 344405 Prema Arts Centre Gloucestershire 17/12/2014 855107 Ardeer Homing Society North Ayrshire 17/12/2014 400621 The Offords Recreation Hut (Known as Offord Village Hall) Cambridgeshire 16/12/2014 298757 Kingston Village Hall Management Committee Cambridgeshire 11/12/2014 415679 Pittington Community Association Durham 10/12/2014 249612 Friends of Queensmill
    [Show full text]
  • Options and Opportunities for Waste to Energy Technologies
    NNFCC Options and opportunities for waste to energy technologies Dr Geraint Evans Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy NNFCC NNFCC Today’s presentation – UK W2E Scene • Waste available • Policy – focus on MSW/C&I • Waste to energy – Mass burn incineration – Advanced thermal processes – gasification • Power • Heat • Fuels – Biochemical processes NNFCC UK waste arisings, million tonnes/year (2008) Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 28.5 1.8 3 1.1 34.4 C&I waste 67.9 5.3 7.8 1.6 82.6 C&D waste 89.6 12.2 11.8 5 118.6 Total 186 19.3 22.6 7.7 235.6 • About half goes to landfill • Landfilling will decline over next decade but will still be in use NNFCC As electrical power equivalent in GWe, assuming 25% conversion efficiency Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.6 C&I waste 5.0 0.4 0.6 0.1 6.1 C&D 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 3.0 waste Total 9.4 0.8 1.1 0.3 11.7 • Compare against: – Drax – 4 GWe; 7% of UK power supply – Air Products IGCC – 50 MWe – Typical mass burn incineration plant – 25 MWe NNFCC Bioenergy Strategy - April 2012 • Sets out the Governments approach to ensuring that the benefits from bioenergy are secured. • Four principles ensure: – Looking out to 2050, genuine carbon reductions are achieved – Bioenergy is cost effective – Regular assessment of potential unintended consequences • Uncertainty is not sufficient to justify inaction. Lower risk pathways have been identified: – Use of wastes – Heat (direct biomass and biomethane) – Transport, in particular advanced biofuels – Electricity, primarily coal conversion but also CHP – longer term, CCS becomes important.
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom
    This is to certify that the Occupational Health & Safety Management System of: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom (Central function listed above. See appendix for additional locations) applicable to: The provision of waste management services has been assessed and registered by NQA against the provisions of: OHSAS 18001: 2007 This registration is subject to the company maintaining an occupational health & safety management system, to the above standard, which will be monitored by NQA. Certificate No. 69747 ISO Approval Date: 21 March 2013 F Reissued: 24 July 2018 Valid Until: 12 March 2021 Managing Director EAC Code: 24, 39 Page 1 of 4 The use of the UKAS Accreditation Mark indicates accreditation in respect of those activities covered by the accreditation certificate number 015 held by NQA. NQA is a trading name of NQA Certification Limited, Registration No. 09351758. Registered Office: Warwick House, Houghton Hall Park, Houghton Regis, Dunstable Bedfordshire LU5 5ZX, United Kingdom. This certificate is the property of NQA and must be returned on request. Appendix to Certificate Number 69747 Includes Facilities Located at: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69747 Head Office 2 Coldbath Square London EC1R 5HL United Kingdom Cory Ship Repair Services Ltd The operation of ship repair services Certificate Number 110435 Wharf Road Gravesend Kent DA12 2RU United Kingdom Riverside Thames Limited The provision of Lighterage
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Riverside Energy
    Riverside Energy Park Environmental Statement Chapter 18: Glossary VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 06 6.1 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park: Environmental Statement (ES) Chapter 18 – Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions Contents 18 Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions .................................................... 1 Chapter 18 – Page i Riverside Energy Park: Environmental Statement (ES) Chapter 18 – Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions 18 Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions Acronym/term Full term/definition AAD 2008 Ambient Air Directive (2008/50/EC) AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic AC Alternating Current ACC Air Cooled Condenser ADMS UK Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System AEL Air Emission Limits AERMOD American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Regulatory Model AHAP Area of High Archaeological Potential ALC Agricultural Land Classification ALGG All London Green Grid Ambient Noise Level The totally encompassing sound in a given situation at a given time, usually composed of a sound from many sources both distant and near (LAeq,T). AN Advice Note – guidance issued by PINS relating to a number of topics relevant to NSIPs Anaerobic Digestion facility Facility to process food and green waste through the degradation of waste by natural organisms, biogas is generated as a useful by-product which can be
    [Show full text]
  • IMO Ref. T5/101 MEPC.3/Circ.4 18 November 2003 FACILITIES IN
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR E Telephone: 020 7735 7611 Fax: 020 7587 3210 Telex: 23588 IMOLDN G IMO Ref. T5/101 MEPC.3/Circ.4 18 November 2003 FACILITIES IN PORTS FOR THE RECEPTION OF OILY WASTES FROM SHIPS 1 It will be recalled that the Government of a Party to MARPOL 73/78 undertakes to ensure the provision of adequate reception facilities in its ports for the reception of oily wastes from oil tankers and other ships using its ports in accordance with regulation 12 of Annex I of the Convention. Furthermore, all Parties to the Convention are required to communicate to the Organization a list of reception facilities in their ports in accordance with article 11(1)(d) of the Convention, and all IMO Member States which are not yet Party to the Convention are also invited to provide such information. 2 With the aim of promoting the effective implementation of the Convention, the Organization, since 1983, has been collecting and disseminating information on the availability of reception facilities through MEPC circulars. 3 The list of oily waste reception facilities is also available on the Internet and can be accessed as follows: http:/www.imo.org (select 'Quick links/Circulars/Reception Facilities). 4 The attached is a complete list of information on oily waste reception facilities submitted by Governments up to October 2003 and supersedes all other circulars on this matter. The list of IMO Member States which have submitted information on oily waste reception facilities contained in this Circular is set out in annex 1 to this circular and the list of facilities in annex 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Waste Management Facilities: a Research Study Issues Arising from the Provision of Waste Management Facilities
    The report is the product of an in-depth consideration of the planning Study Management Facilities: A Research Planning for Waste ODPM issues arising from the provision of waste management facilities. A wide consultation with professionals and operators in the field was carried out for this study which focuses on site-level planning. It sets out the research team's views on the planning considerations raised by a broad range of waste management facilities and identifies the information likely to be required by planning authorities in determining planning applications. The report provides profiles for each type of waste management facility, including a scoping matrix to facilitate the identification of potential impacts. Planning for Waste Management Facilities A Research Study ISBN 1-85112-714-3 ISBN 1 85112 714 3 £18 9 781851 127146 Planning for Waste Management Facilities: A Research Study August 2004 Enviros Consulting Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London The findings and recommendations in this report are those of the consultant authors and do not necessarily represent the views or proposed policies of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Following the reorganisation of the government in May 2002, the responsibilities of the former Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and latterly Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) in this area were transferred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.odpm.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • 71457 Gaz Index Vol Q2 2020.Indd
    ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE INEOS UK SNS Ltd 7215 SP Manweb Plc, Reinforcement to North IOG North Sea Limited and IOG UK Ltd 8482 Shropshire Electricity Distribution Network ENVIRONMENT ODE Asset Management Ltd 10143 Order 6899 Petrogas Neo UK Ltd 10144 AND Petrogas North Sea Ltd 7214 LISTED BUILDINGS AND Premier Oil E & P UK Ltd 7214 CONSERVATION AREAS INFRASTRUCTURE Premier Oil UK Ltd 7214, 8747 Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Ltd 10143 Cyngor Sir Ddinbych, Ardal Gadwraeth y Rhyl Rockrose UKCS8 Llc 10143 9298 Serica Energy (UK) Ltd 7215 Denbighshire County Council, Rhyl Agriculture, forestry Shell U.K. Ltd 7214, 7215, 10144 Conservation Area, Revisions 9298 and fisheries Total E&P North Sea Production Ltd 10144 Hackney L B, Brownswood Conservation Area, Total E&P North Sea UK Ltd 7214, 7215, Designation 8119 Plant Health Act, Official Controls (Plant Health 8747 Hackney L B, Lea Bridge Conservation Area, and Genetically Modified Organisms) (England) Total E&P UK Ltd 7214, 7215, 10143 Revisions 8119 (Amendment) Regulations 2020 7283 Maidstone Borough Council, Boughton Environmental Monchelsea ‘The Quarries’ and ‘The Green’ Communications Conservation Areas, Revisions 6899 protection Nottingham City Council, Old Meadows POSTAL SERVICES Environment Act 1995 (Bristol City Council) Air Conservation Area, Designation 10430 Quality Direction 2020 10812 Reading Borough Council, Castle Hill/Russell Royal Mail Overseas Post Scheme 1 July 2020 Environment Act 1995 (Gateshead Council and Street/Oxford Road Conservation Area 10814 Newcastle City Council)
    [Show full text]