DOCSLIB.ORG

Options and Opportunities for Waste to Energy Technologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Options and Opportunities for Waste to Energy Technologies NNFCC Options and opportunities for waste to energy technologies Dr Geraint Evans Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy NNFCC NNFCC Today’s presentation – UK W2E Scene • Waste available • Policy – focus on MSW/C&I • Waste to energy – Mass burn incineration – Advanced thermal processes – gasification • Power • Heat • Fuels – Biochemical processes NNFCC UK waste arisings, million tonnes/year (2008) Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 28.5 1.8 3 1.1 34.4 C&I waste 67.9 5.3 7.8 1.6 82.6 C&D waste 89.6 12.2 11.8 5 118.6 Total 186 19.3 22.6 7.7 235.6 • About half goes to landfill • Landfilling will decline over next decade but will still be in use NNFCC As electrical power equivalent in GWe, assuming 25% conversion efficiency Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.6 C&I waste 5.0 0.4 0.6 0.1 6.1 C&D 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 3.0 waste Total 9.4 0.8 1.1 0.3 11.7 • Compare against: – Drax – 4 GWe; 7% of UK power supply – Air Products IGCC – 50 MWe – Typical mass burn incineration plant – 25 MWe NNFCC Bioenergy Strategy - April 2012 • Sets out the Governments approach to ensuring that the benefits from bioenergy are secured. • Four principles ensure: – Looking out to 2050, genuine carbon reductions are achieved – Bioenergy is cost effective – Regular assessment of potential unintended consequences • Uncertainty is not sufficient to justify inaction. Lower risk pathways have been identified: – Use of wastes – Heat (direct biomass and biomethane) – Transport, in particular advanced biofuels – Electricity, primarily coal conversion but also CHP – longer term, CCS becomes important. NNFCC Doing the right thing • Defra Waste Review – Get the most energy out of residual waste and not the most waste into energy recovery • Waste incineration directive (WID) – The WID places strict conditions and minimum technical requirements on operators • Waste hierarchy – Will limit available waste NNFCC Energy from waste options Mass burn MRF MBT Thermal Gasification MHT Pyrolysis RDF Waste Treatment SRF RRBF Composting Biological AD Sugars fermentation NNFCC Combustion converts the chemical energy in the waste into heat; gasification and pyrolysis convert the chemical energy in the waste into chemical energy in a gaseous (or liquid) form. NNFCC NNFCC NNFCC Key features • Strict compliance with WID – but, poor image; challenging planning • Large scale (250-300 kT/yr) - economics driven • Typically 23% efficient although latest plants quoting 27% – Efficiency will drop if insufficient feed material or if feed too wet kT/yr MWe Name Location 1 EFW NNFCC850 70 Viridor/Ineos/John Laing CHP (plus 51 Runcorn MWth) 2 EFW 670 95 Peel Environmental Ince Ltd Cheshire 3 EFW 585 66 Cory Environmental Riverside EFW London 4 EFW 675 51 London Waste Ltd Edmonton 5 EFW 500 51 Allington Quarry Kent 6 EFW 500 38 Kent Enviropower Ltd Maidstone 7 EFW 488 37 South East London CHPr Limited Lewisham 8 EFW 410 37 Lakeside Energy From Waste Limited Colnbrook, Slough 9 EFW 300 32 Sita London 10 EFW 420 31 Selchp Middlesex 11 EFW 400 30 Tyseley Waste Disposal Ltd Birmingham 12 EFW 350 30 Viridor, Trident Park Cardiff 13 EFW 280 26 Peel Environment CHP North Yorkshire 14 EFW 300 26 Biffa Skelton Grange Leeds 15 EFW 300 25 Project E2R (Veolia for Staffs CC) Staffordshire 16 EFW 300 24 Oxford waste partnership Oxfordshire 17 EFW 315 24 Coventry/Solihull Waste Disp Co Ltd Coventry 18 EFW 245 23 MVV Umwelt Plymouth waste CHP Plymouth 19 EFW 300 22 FCC Environment Buckinghamshire 20 EFW 300 21 Newhurst EFW, Biffa Leicestershire 21 EFW 275 20 Norfolk PFI EFW Norfolk 22 EFW 260 20 WasteNotts (Reclamation) Ltd Nottingham 23 EFW 250 20 Bogmoor Road, Peel Environmental Ltd Glasgow 24 EFW 263 20 SITA Tees Valley Limited Billingham, Teesside NNFCC 11.5 MT waste; 1,000 MWe. Up to about 20% thermally processed now; could rise to about 34% (excluding gasification projects) kT/yr MWe Name Location 25 EFW 242 19.25 Veolia ES South Downs Ltd Newhaven 26 EFW 225 17 Veolia ES Sheffield Limited Sheffield 27 EFW 210 16 MES Environmental Limited Stoke 28 EFW 187 14 Veolia ES Hampshire Ltd (Marchwood) Southampton 29 EFW 187 14 Veolia ES Hampshire Ltd Portsmouth 30 EFW 150 11 SITA (Kirklees) Limited Huddersfield 31 EFW 127 10 Greater Manchester Waste Ltd Bolton 32 EFW 110 8 MES Environmental Limited Wolverhampton 33 EFW 102 8 Veolia ES Hampshire Ltd Chineham 34 EFW 105 8 MES Environmental Limited Dudley, West Midlands 35 EFW 85 7.25 Viridor, Peterborough Peterborough 36 EFW n/a 7 Sita, Richmond Hill, Douglas Isle of Man 37 EFW 60 3 Viridor, Devon CC Exeter 38 EFW 56 4 Newlincs Development Ltd Grimsby 39 EFW 53 4 Neath Port Talbot Recycling Ltd Swansea 40 EFW 22 7 MWt Lerwick (heat only) Shetlands 41 EFW 4 0.3 Council of The Isles of Scilly Cornwall 11.5 MT waste; 1,000 Upto about MT MWe. thermally20% processed now; 11.5 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 0-50 TPA 51-100 TPA 101-150 TPA could rise to about 34% (excluding gasificationprojects) 151-200 TPA 201-250 TPA NNFCC 251-300 TPA 301-350 TPA 351-400 TPA 401-450 TPA 451-500 TPA 501-550 TPA 551-600 TPA 601-650 TPA 651-700 TPA 701-750 TPA 751-800 TPA 801-850 TPA 851-900 TPA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 901-950 TPA 0-5 MWe 951-1000 TPA 6-10 MWe 11-15 MWe 16-20 MWe 21-25 MWe 26-30 MWe 31-35 MWe 36-40 MWe 41-45 MWe 46-50 MWe 51-55 MWe 56-60 MWe 61-65 MWe 66-70 MWe 71-75 MWe 76-80 MWe 81-85 MWe 86-90 MWe 91-95 MWe 96-100 MWe NNFCC WtE capacity in UK • Could soon to be up to about 11.5 million tonnes/year; ~1000 MWe – Was 4.4 MT in 2007. • Tightness starting to appear – North European Market estimated to have overcapacity of 6.9 140 7 MT in 2011, with gate fees falling. 120 6 6 100 80 60 3 3 3 2 2 2 40 1 1 1 20 0 0 0 0 number of landfill sites MWe net ACT Figures show number of projects NNFCC Gasification - Flexible / “no regrets” technologies • Mitigate against inherent uncertainties of projecting deployment scenarios over long timescales (including the uncertainties around CCS) – Emerging analysis (TINA, ETI, NNFCC) suggests that the development of advanced conversion technologies, in particular reliable gasification and clean-up at scale, is crucial in allowing us to realise this “insurance”. • Crucial gasification variants identified are – Advanced biofuels (e.g. FT fuels) – Biopower – Heat (biomethane/bioSNG) • Technology innovation needed to reduce cost, increase efficiency, increase reliability to support the development of flexible bioenergy which can adapt to inherent uncertainties. NNFCC Furnace/Boiler Strategy identifies Methane gasification as a key (bioSNG) opportunity – values Engine/Turbine its flexibility Fuel cell Diesel / jet fuel Fischer Tropsch Heat n-paraffins Fuels Power direct Ethanol combustion (fermentation) Mixed alcohols chemicals and materials and chemicals Gasification syngas synthesis chemical Hydrogen synthesis DiMethylEther (DME) Methanol MTO/MOGD synthesis Formaldehyde Carbon Acetyls monoxide Ammonia Fertilisers NNFCC Bioenergy Strategy Opportunities • Use of wastes • Heat (direct biomass and biomethane) • Transport, in particular advanced biofuels • Electricity, primarily coal conversion to biomass but also CHP – longer term, CCS becomes important (strong ETI interest in bioCCS). NNFCC Individual technologies are commercially available, particularly the applications. More work is needed to prove the gasification step, to develop enhanced gas clean up for the more advanced applications. The key risks are at the interfaces. Gas cleaning cleaning Gas /polishing and conditioning Syngas All applications are proven but not for Gasification cleaning & biomass – boilers and engines are conditioning most viable in near term NNFCC Gasification to power is emerging with about 800 MWe of projects. Efficiencies are in the range 18-33% with potential to increase towards 40%. Most projects use steam; where power is produced using an engine or turbine, the gasifiers are either downdraft or use plasma treatment in some way NNFCC ETI Waste to Energy Demonstrator • Royal Dahlman leads consortium to win a contract from the ETI to build a 7 MWe combined cycle (IGCC) power plant incorporating a gas turbine – MILENA indirect gasifier with OLGA syngas cleanup technology • Multi feedstock (RDF/SRF/wood) • Ongoing – Pilot plant testing – Process design – Site development • Permitting • Planning NNFCC Gasification and heat - bioSNG air tars Char natural combustion Syngas gas network C0 CH4 Gasification H 2 cooling & Methanation Purification cleaning H2 O (steam) H2 O CO2 heat wood (steam) UK electrical grid water Dual gasifier with steam, Syngas cleaning Methanation at Purification and indirect heating from to remove tars high pressure, with to ensure char combustion. First and other removal of excess bioSNG meets plants plan to use only contaminants to heat to generate network dried clean wood feedstock the ppb level power and steam standards before injection NNFCC • Biomass gasification to produce bioSNG is only at the demonstration stage, with limited experience in downstream fuel synthesis integration • Three developers now active: Developer Project Location Stage Size and start-up year 1 MW unit built at the 8 MW Güssing CHP Güssing bioSNG th BioSNG Pilot plant in June 2009, as part of the EU Bio-SNG Austria project. Previous 10kWbioSNG test-rig in 2003 REPOTEC- Eclépens Gazobois Commercial 21.5 MW plant starting in 2012 CTU Switzerland bioSNG 20 MW in 2012 + 80 MW in 2015/6 with Gothenburg bioSNG bioSNG GoBiGas Commercial Goteborg Energi & E.ON Sweden Possible 200MWbioSNG plant with E.ON after 2015 Petten 25 kW test-rig started in 2004.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPSM2009-1145 WYG Environment Transport
    Ref Ecologist Name & Address Applicants Name & Address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Philip Boniface, Condover Quarry, Condover, EPSM2009-1145 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Shrewsbuy, SY5 7AR. Condover Quarry Condover Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 7AR Willenhall WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Ian Merrill, Severn Trent Water, PO Box 51, Sewage EPSM2009-1169 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Raynesway, Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 7JA Treatment Works Off Anson Road Willenhall West Midlands WS2 0DH Halcrow Group Ltd, Griffin House, 135 High Street, Mr J Beechey, South East Water, Rochfort Road, Kippings Cross to EPSM2009-1174 Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 1DQ Snodland, Kent, ME6 5AH Pembury Kent The National Trust, Mr Stuart Crow, Tattershall, Tattersfield EPSM2009-1181 Lincolnshire, LN4 4LR Castle Sleaford Tattersfield Lincolnshire LN4 4LR InterRoute, Ms Emma Fisher, InterRoute Area 2, 910 Highways Authority, InterRoute Ms A Roberts, Hempton Court, Aztec West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 InterRoute Area 2, 910 Hempton Court, Aztec Summerlands M4 Marker Post EPSM2009-1184 4SR. West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SR. Access Bridge 148/8 Wiltshire Mr James Mitchell, Wessex Water, Claverton Down, Bath, Mr Steve Lanzon, Wessex Water, Claverton Land to the West EPSM2009-1185 BA2 7WW Down, Bath, BA2 7WW Swallet Gate Dauntsey of Swallet Gate Dauntsey Wiltshire Theakston Estates Mr Martin Corney, Elston Hall, Windlestone
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offsetting
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 81 | September 2013 Biodiversity Offsetting In this issue Offsetting and the Repeatability of David Stubbs Awarded Planning System Vegetation Mapping the Institute Medal Welcome Information Biodiversity Needs Powerful Narratives, In Practice No. 81, September 2013 Good Stories and the Right Words ISSN 1754-4882 The recent State of Nature report by 25 conservation and research organisations demonstrates Editor the ongoing losses of biodiversity in the UK. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 has a target Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services by 2020. Three key things are needed to stop the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystems. Editorial Board 1. A Deliverable Vision and Mechanisms to Deliver the Vision Mr Jonathan Barnes, Mr Matthew Chatfi eld, The overall vision and strategy is John Lawton’s Making Space for Nature report. This recognises Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, the importance of ecosystem services and sets out the future as needing to be coherent and Ms Sally Hayns, Dr William Latimer, made up of resilient ecological networks and More, Bigger, Better and Joined-up sites. Green Mrs Allison Potts, Mr Paul Rooney, and blue infrastructure is a fundamental part of these ecological networks that intersperse and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, join up villages, towns and cities. Miss Emma Toovey, Mr Darren Towers The Landscape Institute (LI) has recently revised its Green Infrastructure position statement. Green and blue infrastructure was the subject of the extremely successful joint CIEEM-LI Opinions expressed by contributors conference in Birmingham in early July.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies
    Cheshire West & Chester Council Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies Submission March 2018 Visit: cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk Cheshire Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies W est 1 Introduction 6 and 2 Chester 11 Chester CH 1 - Chester settlement area 12 Council CH 2 - Chester regeneration areas 13 CH 3 - Employment land provision in Chester 17 Local CH 4 - University of Chester 18 Plan CH 5 - Chester conservation areas 19 (Part CH 6 - Chester key views, landmarks and gateways and historic skyline 22 T wo) 3 Ellesmere Port 25 Land EP 1 - Ellesmere Port settlement area 26 Allocations EP 2 - Employment land provision in Ellesmere Port 27 EP 3 - Stanlow special policy area 33 and EP 4 - Hooton Park 36 Detailed EP 5 - Thornton Science Park 38 Policies EP 6 - Ince Park 40 EP 7 - Ellesmere Port historic canal port 42 Submission 4 Northwich 44 N 1 - Northwich settlement area 44 N 2 - Northwich regeneration areas 45 N 3 - Meeting the outstanding housing requirement in Northwich 49 N 4 - Employment land provision in Northwich 51 N 5 - Gadbrook Park 52 N 6 - Northwich conservation area 54 5 Winsford 56 W 1 - Winsford settlement area 56 W 2 - Employment land provision in Winsford 58 Contents Cheshire 6 Rural area 60 R 1 - Development in the rural area 60 W est R 2 - Meeting the outstanding housing requirement in Tattenhall 63 and R 3 - Employment land provision in the rural area 66 Chester 7 Green Belt and countryside 71 Council GBC 1 - Commercial sites in the Green Belt 72 GBC 2 - Protection of landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Technology in Society (SATIS) Book 6
    , SCIENCE & 1 - TECHNOLOGY 0 IN SOCIETY ~ • • • ABOUT SATIS Science and Technology in Society units are designed to be used in conjunction with conventional science courses, particularly those leading to GCSE examinations. Each unit has links to major science topics as well as exploring important social and technological applications and issues. The units are self-contained and generally require about 2 periods (around 75 minutes) of classroom time. Each unit comprises Teachers' Notes (blue sheets) and Students' materials (white sheets). Full guidance on use is given in the Teachers' Notes accompanying each unit, which also include background information and suggest further resources. Each SATIS book contains ten units. The units are numbered in a system giving the number of the book followed by the number of the unit within that book. Thus the first unit in the first SATIS book is numbered 10l. In addition to the SATIS books, a general Teacher's Guide to the project is available, giving guidance on some of the teaching techniques involved as well as ideas for further activities. Many people from schools, universities,. industry and the professions have contributed to the writing, development and trials of the SATIS project. A full list of contributors appears in the Teachers' Guide. The material which follows may be reproduced without infringing copyright provided reproduction isfor student use only. The permission of the publishers must be obtained before reproducing the material for any other purpose. First published 1986 by The Association
    [Show full text]
  • Yntfletic Fne]R OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS 0 NATURAL GAS
    2SO yntfletic fne]R OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS 0 NATURAL GAS VOLUME 28 - NUMBER 4- DECEMBER 1991 QUARTERLY Tsit Ertl Repository Artur Lakes Library C3orzdo School of M.ss © THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. ® Reg . U.S. P.I. OFF. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report is published by The Pace Consultants Inc., as a multi-client service and is intended for the sole use of the clients or organizations affiliated with clients by virtue of a relationship equivalent to 51 percent or greater ownership. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report Is protected by the copyright laws of the United States; reproduction of any part of the publication requires the express permission of The Pace Con- sultants Inc. The Pace Consultants Inc., has provided energy consulting and engineering services since 1955. The company experience includes resource evalua- tion, process development and design, systems planning, marketing studies, licensor comparisons, environmental planning, and economic analysis. The Synthetic Fuels Analysis group prepares a variety of periodic and other reports analyzing developments In the energy field. THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. SYNTHETIC FUELS ANALYSIS MANAGING EDITOR Jerry E. Sinor Pt Office Box 649 Niwot, Colorado 80544 (303) 652-2632 BUSINESS MANAGER Ronald L. Gist Post Office Box 53473 Houston, Texas 77052 (713) 669-8800 Telex: 77-4350 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS A-i I. GENERAL CORPORATIONS CSIRO Continues Strong Liquid Fuels Program 1-1 GOVERNMENT DOE Fossil Energy Budget Holds Its Ground 1-3 New SBIR Solicitation Covers Alternative Fuels 1-3 USA/USSR Workshop on Fossil Energy Held 1-8 ENERGY POLICY AND FORECASTS Politics More Important than Economics in Projecting Oil Market 1-10 Study by Environmental Groups Suggests Energy Use Could be Cut in Half 1-10 OTA Reports on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model
    Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council June 2018 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Disclaimer Anthesis Consulting Group PLC has prepared this report for the sole use of Durham County Council and for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement between Anthesis and Durham County Council under which this report was completed. Anthesis has exercised due and customary care in preparing this report but has not, save as specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. The use of this report, or reliance on its content, by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Anthesis shall be at their own risk, and Anthesis accepts no duty of care to such third parties. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on facts and circumstances as they existed at the time the report was prepared. Any changes in such facts and circumstances may adversely affect the recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this report. Anthesis Consulting Group, 2018 1 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council Prepared for: Prepared by: Spatial Policy Team Anthesis Consulting Group Regeneration & Local Services Development The Future Centre, Durham County Council 9 Newtec Place,
    [Show full text]
  • The Net Zero North West Cluster Plan Phase 1: Shaping an Industrial Cluster Plan
    The Net Zero North West Cluster Plan Phase 1: Shaping an Industrial Cluster Plan FINAL REPORT AUGUST 2020 PROJECT PARTNERS: Net Zero North West Cluster Plan Phase 1 : Shaping an Industrial Cluster Plan Contents Page Foreword 3 Executive Summary 4 Phase 1 Programme Activity 5 Phase 2 Programme Design 7 1. Introduction 9 Phase 1 Project Partners 10 2. Decarbonising Industrial Production in the North West 11 Why is it important to decarbonise industry? 11 Regional & Sub-regional drivers 14 3. Net Zero NW Cluster Plan – Phase 1 23 Industry Engagement 24 Phase 1 Research 25 4. Phase 1 Business Case Recommendations Summary 32 5. Net Zero NW Cluster Plan – Phase 2 36 Phase 2 – Additional Project Partners 38 Industry and Local Government Collaboration 39 A. Industrial Consumers Workstream 43 B. Networks Workstream 44 C. Generation & Production Workstream 45 An Industrial Cluster Plan 46 APPENDIX A - PHASE 2 WORKSTREAMS ANNEXES ANNEX A – EXISTING ASSETS, EMISSIONS DATA ANNEX B – INDUSTRIAL ZONES ANNEX C – SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS Net Zero North West Cluster Plan Phase 1 : Shaping an Industrial Cluster Plan Foreword “Home to the industrial revolution, the North West is still a powerhouse of manufacturing and chemical production. Decarbonising our industry is not only vital to the UK’s net zero ambitions but is critical to safeguard and grow the high value jobs that make this region thrive. “Led by industry, Net Zero North West is driving investment into the net zero economy and post COVID-19 green recovery in the North West. Our strength lies in the unrivalled number of initiatives already happening on the ground which offer sustainable investment opportunities in net zero and will see this region become a world leader in clean growth.
    [Show full text]
  • North East England Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013
    North East England Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013 Published December 2014 North East Aggregates Working Party County Durham │Northumberland │Tees Valley │Tyne and Wear North East Aggregates Working Party Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013 Published December 2014 Published by Northumberland County Council on behalf of the North East Aggregates Working Party For further information on this document and the North East Aggregates Working Party, please contact: Kevin Tipple Secretary to the North East Aggregates Working Party Northumberland County Council Planning and Housing Services County Hall Morpeth Northumberland NE61 2EF Telephone: 01670 623631 Email: [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... ii Main report 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2. Planning policy context .......................................................................................... 4 3. Production and reserves of primary aggregates: Crushed rock ............................ 6 4. Production and reserves of primary aggregates: land won sand and gravel ....... 14 5. Production of primary aggregates: Marine sand and gravel ................................ 21 6. Recycled and secondary aggregates .................................................................. 25 7. Development Plans ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Recording Our Decision-Making Process
    Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Including BATc Additions. Jan 2020 Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Consultation on our decision document recording our decision-making process The Permit Number is: EPR/GP3535QS The Applicant / Operator is: Cory Environmental Holdings Ltd. The Installation is located at: Riverside Energy Park. Norman Road North Belvedere London DA17 6JY What this document is about This is a decision document, which accompanies a permit. It explains how we have considered the Applicant’s Application, and why we have included the specific conditions in the draft permit we are proposing to issue to the Applicant. It is our record of our decision-making process, to show how we have taken into account all relevant factors in reaching our position. Unless the document explains otherwise, we have accepted the Applicant’s proposals. We try to explain our decision as accurately, comprehensively and plainly as possible. Achieving all three objectives is not always easy, and we would welcome any feedback as to how we might improve our decision documents in future. A lot of technical terms and acronyms are inevitable in a document of this nature: we provide a glossary of acronyms near the front of the document, for ease of reference. Issued 17/07/2020 Page 1 of 147 EPR/GP3535QS/A001 Preliminary information and use of terms We gave the application the reference number EPR/GP3535QS/A001. We refer to the application as “the Application” in this document in order to be consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • DTI Technology Band Site Name Installed Capacity Region Country Municipal and Industrial Waste Crystal Palace Energy Centre 0.33
    Installed DTI Technology Band Site Name Region Country Capacity Municipal and Industrial Waste Crystal Palace Energy Centre 0.33 South East England Municipal and Industrial Waste Chapel Renewable Energy Centre 0.38 South East England Municipal and Industrial Waste R.Plevin & Sons CHP 1.6 East Midlands England Municipal and Industrial Waste Allerton Waste Recovery Park (EfW) 2 Yorkshire and Humber England Municipal and Industrial Waste Cheney Manor (EfW) 2 South East England Municipal and Industrial Waste The Airfield, Chelveston 2 East Midlands England Municipal and Industrial Waste Windwhistle Energy Project 2.69 South West England Municipal and Industrial Waste Glenavy Incinerator (EfW) 3 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Municipal and Industrial Waste Breg 4 East Midlands England Biomass - Dedicated AHS Energy 4.5 South East England Municipal and Industrial Waste Bryn Lane Recycling (EfW) 5.2 Wales Wales Waste Wood EQ Waste, Appspond Lane 6 Eastern England Municipal and Industrial Waste Duncrue Road Energy from Waste Plant (EfW) 6.65 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Municipal and Industrial Waste Dargavel (EfW) 7.2 Scotland Scotland Municipal and Industrial Waste Battlefield Energy from Waste Facility (EfW) 8 West Midlands England Municipal and Industrial Waste Contract Chemicals 8 North West England Municipal and Industrial Waste Shewalton 8 Scotland Scotland Biomass - Dedicated Green Lane Eco Park (EfW) 9 North West England Municipal and Industrial Waste Poole MRF (EfW) 9.227 South West England Municipal and Industrial Waste Marston
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesbrough Council Local Plan
    MIDDLESBROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN - HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN MARCH 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The Local Plan - Housing 4 3. Infrastructure planning - legislative, policy and wider context 5 4. Methodology 8 5. Scoping 9 6. Baseline infrastructure assessments 12 7. Infrastructure delivery schedule 45 Appendix A Housing allocations 59 Appendix B Mobile telecommunications sites in Middlesbrough 61 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Produced in line with national planning policy (see paragraphs 3.2 - 3.4 for more details), this Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) provides details of infrastructure needed to support future growth as a result of the Local Plan - Housing, including the type, timing and potential costs of infrastructure. 1.2 The IDP is intended to be a 'living' document, with its content monitored on a regular basis (in all likelihood alongside the Local Plan Annual Monitoring Report [AMR]) and updated as appropriate, in order to reflect changing circumstances, including when any new Local Development Documents (LDDs) are produced as part of the overarching Local Plan. To remain up-to-date, a flow of information from (internal [i.e. Council) and external) service providers to the Planning Policy team will be required on a regular basis. 1.3 The IDP does not include every infrastructure project planned in Middlesbrough or provide a list of planning obligations; it only includes those that will help to deliver the development (i.e. housing) proposed by the Local Plan - Housing or contribute towards the creation of sustainable communities. It does, however, identify areas where gaps in provision exist or are likely to exist over the plan period.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Construction Forecast SAMPLE
    UK Construction Forecast SAMPLE UK Construction Forecast Summer 2018 Volume 24: Issue 3 A report by the Forecasting Committee for the Construction Industries This report has been prepared for publication by the Construction Futures team, which is part of Experian’s Economics Unit, with guidance from its Forecasting Committee for the Construction Industries. The members of the committee serve in a personal not a representative capacity. The contribution of the members, and that of the Forecasting Groups (listed in Appendix D), is gratefully acknowledged. Whilst every endeavour has been made to obtain the best available data from appropriate sources, Experian’s Market Insight Division can give no guarantee of accuracy, nor for the applicability of the forecasts for particular decisions. No responsibility is taken for any consequential loss or other effects from these data. Copyright © Experian 2018 ISSN 0308-079X Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, and only as permitted under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1998, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the Publishers or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK. US copyright law is applicable in the US. Printed by PAPCOM © Experian UK Construction Forecast Summer 2018 Volume 24: Issue 3 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1 1. Macroeconomic outlook 9 2. Housing 16 3. Housing repair, maintenance and improvement 23 4. New infrastructure 28 5.
    [Show full text]