DOCSLIB.ORG

Zero Waste Study Tour

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zero Waste Study Tour Zero Waste Study Tour LONDON 31 AUGUST 2018 CAMERON SMITH PARTNER, ASHURST LLP Contents 1. Introduction to Ashurst 2. Working with Cory Environmental 3. Typical PPP and merchant waste project structures 4. Differences between PPP deals and “merchant” EfW deals 5. Riverside EfW contractual and commercial structure 6. Making EfW projects “bankable” 7. Public Sector concerns: bringing a project “to market” 8. Questions? 2 1. Introduction to Ashurst GLOBAL REACH Glasgow Brussels London Frankfurt Paris Munich Milan Beijing New York Madrid Washington DC New Delhi Tokyo Shanghai Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Jeddah Dubai Mumbai Singapore Ashurst offices Jakarta Port Moresby Indian Law Partners (Best Friend Firm with Ashurst) Oentoeng Suria & Partners Brisbane Perth (Associated Office with Ashurst) Sydney Canberra Melbourne Faisal Adnan Baassiri Law Firm In Association with Ashurst LLP ADTLaw LLC (Singapore Formal Law Alliance) 3 ASHURST’S PPP AND WASTE EXPERIENCE - AWARDS Best Energy from Waste Initiative (Barnsley, Legal Adviser of the Year - Renewables Doncaster and Rotherham PFI) IJ AWARDS 2014 NATIONAL RECYCLING AWARDS 2016 Europe and Africa Law Firm of the Year Best Renewables Law Firm of the Year IJ GLOBAL AWARDS 2014 TOPLEGAL AWARDS 2016 Europe Refinancing Deal of the Year (Castor) Projects, Energy and Natural Resources: Firm PROJECT FINANCE MAGAZINE DEAL OF THE of the Year YEAR AWARDS 2013 LEGAL 500 AWARDS 2015 Europe Onshore Wind Deal of the Year Legal Adviser of the Year, Gold Award (Infinis) PARTNERSHIPS AWARDS 2015 PROJECT FINANCE MAGAZINE DEAL OF THE YEAR AWARDS 2013 Europe Biomass Deal of the Year European Power Deal of the Year (Carrington (Cramlington) CCGT) IJ AWARDS 2015 PFI AWARDS 2012 Best Waste/Energy/Water Project (Dublin Waste-to-Energy PPP, Ireland) PARTNERSHIP AWARDS 2015 4 INTERNATIONAL EFW EXPERIENCE Our extensive waste management and power experience enables us to provide a unique depth of specialist knowledge on EfW projects around the world. WHEELABRATOR FCC KUWAITI GOVERNMENT BANK GROUP in respect of its bid for the in relation to its ongoing bid for in relation to its landmark Kabd on the financing of the Dublin Cayman Islands EfW PPP project the Belgrade Waste PPP project Waste to Energy PPP project Waste to Energy PPP project CAYMAN ISLANDS SERBIA KUWAIT IRELAND GLOBAL RENEWABLE RE.GROUP PTY LTD USITALL AB SATAREM S.A. EASTERN CREEK PTY LTD on the prospective divestment by in relation to the development of in relation to the contract for the on the development of a RDF the Southern Metropolitan three energy from waste facilities collection of all waste in Conakry Circuit at the Eastern Creek Regional Council of waste in Galati, Ploesti and Bucharest Waste Facility processing assets GUINEA ROMANIA AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA 5 KEY PROJECTS - SNAPSHOT Hybrid EfW PPP/municipal projects Merchant EfW projects projects Worcestershire Viridor/Laing/Ineos County Council (as Cory Environmental Funders consortium lender) Wheelabrator on the on the on the on the Riverside Waste on the Allington Waste Greater Manchester Herefordshire & EFW PPP/semi- Kemsley Waste CHP EfW Waste EfW PFI Worcestershire merchant Waste EfW PFI Shanks/Interserve Funders Covanta Energy / Covanta Energy/ Club of six funders Biffa Veolia on the on the on the on the on the Derbyshire and Edinburgh & Dublin Waste EfW Newhurst & Protos Rookery EfW Derby City Waste Midlothian Waste PPP project EfW projects project Gasification PPP EfW PPP (on-going) (on-going) Brockwell Energy and RBS (as lead Green Investment Funders arranger) Group on the on the on the Cornwall Waste Earls Gate Northumberland EfW PPP (Grangemouth) EfW Waste EfW PPP CHP project (on- going) 6 2. Working with Cory Environmental 10+ YEAR RELATIONSHIP Development of the EfW Negotiating contracts with Facility and the MRF Western Riverside Waste facility at Smugglers Authority Way Transfer Station Original Financing Bidding for and winning of Riverside EfW the Waste Disposal Facility Contract with London Borough of Bexley ASHURST & CORY Refinancing of RRRL and its EfW facility Bidding for and winning the Waste Disposal Contract with London Borough of Tower Hamlets Bids for Waste Disposal Contracts 7 3. Typical PPP and merchant EfW project structures TYPICAL PFI/PPP WASTE DEAL Local Authority/Council Sponsors Funders Direct Agreement Project Leases Agreement Equity Subscription Agreement Insurance Contracts Banks Insurers Finance and Security Documents ProjectCo ("SPV") Operating and EPC/Construction Other Agreements: Maintenance Sub-Contract Sub-Contract • Collateral Warranties etc • Subcontract Direct Agreements • Parent Company Guarantees • Shareholders Agreement(?) • Management Services Agreement(?) Interface Agreement • Performance Bond/LCs Construction Operating Sub-Contractor Sub-Contract Equipment Civils Offtake Transport Recyclate Others Others Supplier Contractor Agreement Contractor Offtaker 8 MERCHANT WASTE DEAL Waste Supplier(s) Finance and Landlord Security Documents (and standby waste agreement(s) Banks Lease/Property Waste Supply Documents Agreement(s) Other Agreements: Insurance Contracts • Shareholders Agreement(?) • Management Services Agreement(?) Insurers • Direct Agreements between Banks and sub-contractors/waste suppliers ProjectCo Equity Subscription • Parent Company Guarantees Agreement ("Borrower") • Performance Bonds/LCs • Sponsor support agreement EPC/Construction Sub-Contract Sponsors Operation & Maintenance Sub-Contract Operating Sub- Construction contract Sub-Contractor Interface Agreement Equipment Civils Recyclate RDF Offtake Transport Landfill Others Others Supplier Contractor Contract Agreement Contract Operator 9 4. Differences between PPP and “merchant” EfW deals KEY DIFFERENCES Subject PPP/PFI projects Merchant projects Tender • Long and expensive tender process • No tender phase involving a municipal body Documentation: • Use of rigid standardised project documents • Greater flexibility with respect to documentation • Subcontracts reflect pass-down of all project and risk allocation risks • Greater scope for negotiation • Strategic approach needs to be adopted Project • Generally maximum of 25-30 years • 35+ years duration: • Plant is then handed over to the Authority with • No handback to municipal body associated handback requirements • Dependent on commercial life of asset and site access rights Design / • Authority will generally provide a detailed • Owners have greater flexibility with designing specification output specification with which the facility must facility as it sees fit flexibility: comply • Scope for expansion, repowering and • Limited flexibility once designed modification Site • Site owned my municipal body with access • Sponsors will either own the site or be deliverability: rights provided to project company responsible for procuring a long-term lease • Site risks borne by Authority to some extent • Site & title issues are far more critical • Royalties often payable to landlord Planning: • All key planning and permitting risk allocated • Planning and permitting risk will be dealt with prior to Financial Close but permits etc. may be prior to Financial Close obtained after contract award 10 KEY DIFFERENCES (CONT.) Subject PPP/PFI projects Merchant projects Source of fuel: • Majority of waste received from Authority • Municipal or C&I waste may be contracted • Authority has priority over all capacity at • Single fuel supplier or several key fuel the facility suppliers • Guaranteed minimum tonnages and • Credit strength of suppliers determines exclusivity over waste arisings bankability of project • Put-or-pay arrangements Insurance: • Protection for uninsurability – municipal • No protection for uninsurability body may elect to self-insure Termination • Payment of termination compensation in all • No termination compensation payable by any compensation: scenarios (including project company Authority or third party if project defaults default) • ProjectCo/Funders bear subcontract termination and replacement risk Change in law • Authority will bear risk associated with • ProjectCo/Funders will bear the principal / regulatory Qualifying Changes in Law and certain risks associated with changes in changes: regulatory changes law/regulations • Change of law risk difficult to allocate to counterparties (e.g. Operator or Fuel Supplier) during operation 11 5. Riverside EfW contractual and commercial structure 12 6. Making EfW projects “bankable” Subject Requirement 1. Counterparties: • Experienced; substantial balance sheet; prepared to bear adequate levels of project risk • Recent trends show that banks like to see O&M Contractors with other roles on projects (e.g. dual EPC/O&M roles or equity stakes) 2. EfW technology: • Used in multiple UK/European/Asian reference plants; used to process feedstock of similar composition 3. Security: • Parent company guarantees • Performance bonding, warranty bonding and/or letters of credit, as required • Net asset value or credit ratings tests to be satisfied, as required • Key sub-contractor step-in arrangements 4. Feedstock: • Long term guaranteed waste stream is key • Sufficient fuel must be available from tier 1 or 2 waste management companies or a public sector body • Must be available under long term fuel supply agreement(s) (i.e. exceeding tenor of debt by 2-3 years minimum) at a sufficient gate fee on a “put-or-pay” basis to meet debt base case assumptions and debt sizing model assumptions • Alternative fuel supply arrangements might range from a single tier 1 or 2 waste supplier to several tier
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPSM2009-1145 WYG Environment Transport
    Ref Ecologist Name & Address Applicants Name & Address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address Site address WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Philip Boniface, Condover Quarry, Condover, EPSM2009-1145 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Shrewsbuy, SY5 7AR. Condover Quarry Condover Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 7AR Willenhall WYG Environment Transport Planning, MS V Thomas, Mr Ian Merrill, Severn Trent Water, PO Box 51, Sewage EPSM2009-1169 Avalon Way, Anstey, Leicestershire, LE7 7GR. Raynesway, Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 7JA Treatment Works Off Anson Road Willenhall West Midlands WS2 0DH Halcrow Group Ltd, Griffin House, 135 High Street, Mr J Beechey, South East Water, Rochfort Road, Kippings Cross to EPSM2009-1174 Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 1DQ Snodland, Kent, ME6 5AH Pembury Kent The National Trust, Mr Stuart Crow, Tattershall, Tattersfield EPSM2009-1181 Lincolnshire, LN4 4LR Castle Sleaford Tattersfield Lincolnshire LN4 4LR InterRoute, Ms Emma Fisher, InterRoute Area 2, 910 Highways Authority, InterRoute Ms A Roberts, Hempton Court, Aztec West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 InterRoute Area 2, 910 Hempton Court, Aztec Summerlands M4 Marker Post EPSM2009-1184 4SR. West, Almodsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SR. Access Bridge 148/8 Wiltshire Mr James Mitchell, Wessex Water, Claverton Down, Bath, Mr Steve Lanzon, Wessex Water, Claverton Land to the West EPSM2009-1185 BA2 7WW Down, Bath, BA2 7WW Swallet Gate Dauntsey of Swallet Gate Dauntsey Wiltshire Theakston Estates Mr Martin Corney, Elston Hall, Windlestone
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offsetting
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 81 | September 2013 Biodiversity Offsetting In this issue Offsetting and the Repeatability of David Stubbs Awarded Planning System Vegetation Mapping the Institute Medal Welcome Information Biodiversity Needs Powerful Narratives, In Practice No. 81, September 2013 Good Stories and the Right Words ISSN 1754-4882 The recent State of Nature report by 25 conservation and research organisations demonstrates Editor the ongoing losses of biodiversity in the UK. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 has a target Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services by 2020. Three key things are needed to stop the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystems. Editorial Board 1. A Deliverable Vision and Mechanisms to Deliver the Vision Mr Jonathan Barnes, Mr Matthew Chatfi eld, The overall vision and strategy is John Lawton’s Making Space for Nature report. This recognises Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, the importance of ecosystem services and sets out the future as needing to be coherent and Ms Sally Hayns, Dr William Latimer, made up of resilient ecological networks and More, Bigger, Better and Joined-up sites. Green Mrs Allison Potts, Mr Paul Rooney, and blue infrastructure is a fundamental part of these ecological networks that intersperse and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, join up villages, towns and cities. Miss Emma Toovey, Mr Darren Towers The Landscape Institute (LI) has recently revised its Green Infrastructure position statement. Green and blue infrastructure was the subject of the extremely successful joint CIEEM-LI Opinions expressed by contributors conference in Birmingham in early July.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Recording Our Decision-Making Process
    Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Including BATc Additions. Jan 2020 Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Consultation on our decision document recording our decision-making process The Permit Number is: EPR/GP3535QS The Applicant / Operator is: Cory Environmental Holdings Ltd. The Installation is located at: Riverside Energy Park. Norman Road North Belvedere London DA17 6JY What this document is about This is a decision document, which accompanies a permit. It explains how we have considered the Applicant’s Application, and why we have included the specific conditions in the draft permit we are proposing to issue to the Applicant. It is our record of our decision-making process, to show how we have taken into account all relevant factors in reaching our position. Unless the document explains otherwise, we have accepted the Applicant’s proposals. We try to explain our decision as accurately, comprehensively and plainly as possible. Achieving all three objectives is not always easy, and we would welcome any feedback as to how we might improve our decision documents in future. A lot of technical terms and acronyms are inevitable in a document of this nature: we provide a glossary of acronyms near the front of the document, for ease of reference. Issued 17/07/2020 Page 1 of 147 EPR/GP3535QS/A001 Preliminary information and use of terms We gave the application the reference number EPR/GP3535QS/A001. We refer to the application as “the Application” in this document in order to be consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom
    This is to certify that the Environmental Management System of: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom (Central function listed above. See appendix for additional locations) applicable to: The provision of waste management services has been assessed and registered by NQA against the provisions of: ISO 14001:2015 This registration is subject to the company maintaining an environmental management system, to the above standard, which will be monitored by NQA Certificate No. 69746 ISO Approval Date: 21 March 2013 Reissued: 24 July 2018 Valid Until: 24 July 2021 FManaging Director EAC Code: 24, 39 Page 1 of 4 The use of the UKAS Accreditation Mark indicates accreditation in respect of those activities covered by the accreditation certificate number 015 held by NQA. NQA is a trading name of NQA Certification Limited, Registration No. 09351758. Registered Office: Warwick House, Houghton Hall Park, Houghton Regis, Dunstable Bedfordshire LU5 5ZX, United Kingdom. This certificate is the property of NQA and must be returned on request. Appendix to Certificate Number 69746 Includes Facilities Located at: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69746 Head Office 2 Coldbath Square London EC1R 5HL United Kingdom Cory Environmental Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69746/2 Walbrook Transfer Station, Corporation of London Contract Upper Thames Street, London EC4R 3TD United Kingdom Cory Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames Mayor of London 1
    London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames London Plan Implementation Report January 2005 Cover photo stories: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 JJ Prior delivering aggregates to RMC Fulham (Comley’s Wharf). The aggregates, sand and gravel, originate from Prior’s quarry at Fingringhoe on the River Colne near Colchester. Prior owns seven aggregate vessels ranging in size from 250 to 600 tonne cargo carrying capacity. The vessels load directly from the quarry and delivery direct to upriver aggregates facilities, carrying approximately 160,000 tonnes per year. These small ships make a huge contribution to keeping heavy lorries off London’s streets. In recognition of this, the company has received several Freight Facilities Grants towards the cost of vessel refurbishment. 2 A panorama of two safeguarded Wandsworth terminals: Cringle Dock, a waste transfer station owned by the Western Riverside Waste Authority and operated by Cory Environmental; and RMC Battersea, owned and operated as a concrete batching plant by RMC. These two berths primarily handle cargo that has been transhipped within the Port of London, sea-dredged aggregates and cement arriving at RMC Battersea from terminals in Greenwich, Northfleet and Greenhithe and household waste barged from Cringle Dock to Mucking in Essex. In 2001, over 375,000 tonnes of cargo was handled at these two terminals, which kept over 51,000 lorry movements of the capital’s streets. 3 A Cory Environmental owned tug pulling a pair of dumb barges upstream through Lambeth Bridge carrying empty containers for loading with household waste at two safeguarded water transfer stations in Wandsworth (Western Riverside Waste Transfer Station and Cringle Dock).
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly List of All Environmental Bodies Enrolled with ENTRUST
    Monthly list of all Environmental Bodies enrolled with ENTRUST Correct as of 31 January 2015 EB Environmental Body EB location Date no. enrolled 328317 Strathmiglo Park Group Fife 28/01/2015 134353 Little Hinton Village Hall Trust Wiltshire 28/01/2015 370124 BACUP CRICKET CLUB Lancashire 28/01/2015 451403 Newtown Cricket Club Powys 23/01/2015 319747 Clydesdale Community Initiatives South Lanarkshire 21/01/2015 802040 Standbridge Lane Community Development Trust West Yorkshire 21/01/2015 929273 Witham Hill Gymnastics Club Lincolnshire 20/01/2015 185180 Halkyn Cricket Club Flintshire 19/01/2015 935470 Spey Bay Hall and Amenities Association Moray 16/01/2015 478817 Ellesmere Rangers Football Club Shropshire 14/01/2015 441302 The Friends of Bodymoor Heath Victory Hall Warwickshire 13/01/2015 554417 Wymeswold Cricket Club Leicestershire 23/12/2014 303928 Covesea Lighthouse Community Company Limited Moray 22/12/2014 950676 Hartlebury Castle Preservation Trust Worcestershire 18/12/2014 426937 The Pelham CIO East Sussex 18/12/2014 826662 Friends of Montgomery Street Park Midlothian 18/12/2014 552516 Barrow Gurney Village hall Somerset 18/12/2014 349756 Holne Playpark Charity Devon 17/12/2014 344405 Prema Arts Centre Gloucestershire 17/12/2014 855107 Ardeer Homing Society North Ayrshire 17/12/2014 400621 The Offords Recreation Hut (Known as Offord Village Hall) Cambridgeshire 16/12/2014 298757 Kingston Village Hall Management Committee Cambridgeshire 11/12/2014 415679 Pittington Community Association Durham 10/12/2014 249612 Friends of Queensmill
    [Show full text]
  • Options and Opportunities for Waste to Energy Technologies
    NNFCC Options and opportunities for waste to energy technologies Dr Geraint Evans Head of Biofuels and Bioenergy NNFCC NNFCC Today’s presentation – UK W2E Scene • Waste available • Policy – focus on MSW/C&I • Waste to energy – Mass burn incineration – Advanced thermal processes – gasification • Power • Heat • Fuels – Biochemical processes NNFCC UK waste arisings, million tonnes/year (2008) Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 28.5 1.8 3 1.1 34.4 C&I waste 67.9 5.3 7.8 1.6 82.6 C&D waste 89.6 12.2 11.8 5 118.6 Total 186 19.3 22.6 7.7 235.6 • About half goes to landfill • Landfilling will decline over next decade but will still be in use NNFCC As electrical power equivalent in GWe, assuming 25% conversion efficiency Northern England Wales Scotland Total Ireland MSW 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.6 C&I waste 5.0 0.4 0.6 0.1 6.1 C&D 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 3.0 waste Total 9.4 0.8 1.1 0.3 11.7 • Compare against: – Drax – 4 GWe; 7% of UK power supply – Air Products IGCC – 50 MWe – Typical mass burn incineration plant – 25 MWe NNFCC Bioenergy Strategy - April 2012 • Sets out the Governments approach to ensuring that the benefits from bioenergy are secured. • Four principles ensure: – Looking out to 2050, genuine carbon reductions are achieved – Bioenergy is cost effective – Regular assessment of potential unintended consequences • Uncertainty is not sufficient to justify inaction. Lower risk pathways have been identified: – Use of wastes – Heat (direct biomass and biomethane) – Transport, in particular advanced biofuels – Electricity, primarily coal conversion but also CHP – longer term, CCS becomes important.
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom
    This is to certify that the Occupational Health & Safety Management System of: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited Head Office, 2 Coldbath Square, London, EC1R 5HL, United Kingdom (Central function listed above. See appendix for additional locations) applicable to: The provision of waste management services has been assessed and registered by NQA against the provisions of: OHSAS 18001: 2007 This registration is subject to the company maintaining an occupational health & safety management system, to the above standard, which will be monitored by NQA. Certificate No. 69747 ISO Approval Date: 21 March 2013 F Reissued: 24 July 2018 Valid Until: 12 March 2021 Managing Director EAC Code: 24, 39 Page 1 of 4 The use of the UKAS Accreditation Mark indicates accreditation in respect of those activities covered by the accreditation certificate number 015 held by NQA. NQA is a trading name of NQA Certification Limited, Registration No. 09351758. Registered Office: Warwick House, Houghton Hall Park, Houghton Regis, Dunstable Bedfordshire LU5 5ZX, United Kingdom. This certificate is the property of NQA and must be returned on request. Appendix to Certificate Number 69747 Includes Facilities Located at: Cory Environmental Holdings Limited The provision of waste management services Certificate Number 69747 Head Office 2 Coldbath Square London EC1R 5HL United Kingdom Cory Ship Repair Services Ltd The operation of ship repair services Certificate Number 110435 Wharf Road Gravesend Kent DA12 2RU United Kingdom Riverside Thames Limited The provision of Lighterage
    [Show full text]
  • Cory Riverside Energy
    Riverside Energy Park Environmental Statement Chapter 18: Glossary VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 06 6.1 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park: Environmental Statement (ES) Chapter 18 – Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions Contents 18 Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions .................................................... 1 Chapter 18 – Page i Riverside Energy Park: Environmental Statement (ES) Chapter 18 – Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions 18 Glossary of Abbreviations and Definitions Acronym/term Full term/definition AAD 2008 Ambient Air Directive (2008/50/EC) AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic AC Alternating Current ACC Air Cooled Condenser ADMS UK Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System AEL Air Emission Limits AERMOD American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Regulatory Model AHAP Area of High Archaeological Potential ALC Agricultural Land Classification ALGG All London Green Grid Ambient Noise Level The totally encompassing sound in a given situation at a given time, usually composed of a sound from many sources both distant and near (LAeq,T). AN Advice Note – guidance issued by PINS relating to a number of topics relevant to NSIPs Anaerobic Digestion facility Facility to process food and green waste through the degradation of waste by natural organisms, biogas is generated as a useful by-product which can be
    [Show full text]
  • IMO Ref. T5/101 MEPC.3/Circ.4 18 November 2003 FACILITIES IN
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR E Telephone: 020 7735 7611 Fax: 020 7587 3210 Telex: 23588 IMOLDN G IMO Ref. T5/101 MEPC.3/Circ.4 18 November 2003 FACILITIES IN PORTS FOR THE RECEPTION OF OILY WASTES FROM SHIPS 1 It will be recalled that the Government of a Party to MARPOL 73/78 undertakes to ensure the provision of adequate reception facilities in its ports for the reception of oily wastes from oil tankers and other ships using its ports in accordance with regulation 12 of Annex I of the Convention. Furthermore, all Parties to the Convention are required to communicate to the Organization a list of reception facilities in their ports in accordance with article 11(1)(d) of the Convention, and all IMO Member States which are not yet Party to the Convention are also invited to provide such information. 2 With the aim of promoting the effective implementation of the Convention, the Organization, since 1983, has been collecting and disseminating information on the availability of reception facilities through MEPC circulars. 3 The list of oily waste reception facilities is also available on the Internet and can be accessed as follows: http:/www.imo.org (select 'Quick links/Circulars/Reception Facilities). 4 The attached is a complete list of information on oily waste reception facilities submitted by Governments up to October 2003 and supersedes all other circulars on this matter. The list of IMO Member States which have submitted information on oily waste reception facilities contained in this Circular is set out in annex 1 to this circular and the list of facilities in annex 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Waste Management Facilities: a Research Study Issues Arising from the Provision of Waste Management Facilities
    The report is the product of an in-depth consideration of the planning Study Management Facilities: A Research Planning for Waste ODPM issues arising from the provision of waste management facilities. A wide consultation with professionals and operators in the field was carried out for this study which focuses on site-level planning. It sets out the research team's views on the planning considerations raised by a broad range of waste management facilities and identifies the information likely to be required by planning authorities in determining planning applications. The report provides profiles for each type of waste management facility, including a scoping matrix to facilitate the identification of potential impacts. Planning for Waste Management Facilities A Research Study ISBN 1-85112-714-3 ISBN 1 85112 714 3 £18 9 781851 127146 Planning for Waste Management Facilities: A Research Study August 2004 Enviros Consulting Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London The findings and recommendations in this report are those of the consultant authors and do not necessarily represent the views or proposed policies of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Following the reorganisation of the government in May 2002, the responsibilities of the former Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and latterly Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) in this area were transferred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.odpm.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • 71457 Gaz Index Vol Q2 2020.Indd
    ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE INEOS UK SNS Ltd 7215 SP Manweb Plc, Reinforcement to North IOG North Sea Limited and IOG UK Ltd 8482 Shropshire Electricity Distribution Network ENVIRONMENT ODE Asset Management Ltd 10143 Order 6899 Petrogas Neo UK Ltd 10144 AND Petrogas North Sea Ltd 7214 LISTED BUILDINGS AND Premier Oil E & P UK Ltd 7214 CONSERVATION AREAS INFRASTRUCTURE Premier Oil UK Ltd 7214, 8747 Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Ltd 10143 Cyngor Sir Ddinbych, Ardal Gadwraeth y Rhyl Rockrose UKCS8 Llc 10143 9298 Serica Energy (UK) Ltd 7215 Denbighshire County Council, Rhyl Agriculture, forestry Shell U.K. Ltd 7214, 7215, 10144 Conservation Area, Revisions 9298 and fisheries Total E&P North Sea Production Ltd 10144 Hackney L B, Brownswood Conservation Area, Total E&P North Sea UK Ltd 7214, 7215, Designation 8119 Plant Health Act, Official Controls (Plant Health 8747 Hackney L B, Lea Bridge Conservation Area, and Genetically Modified Organisms) (England) Total E&P UK Ltd 7214, 7215, 10143 Revisions 8119 (Amendment) Regulations 2020 7283 Maidstone Borough Council, Boughton Environmental Monchelsea ‘The Quarries’ and ‘The Green’ Communications Conservation Areas, Revisions 6899 protection Nottingham City Council, Old Meadows POSTAL SERVICES Environment Act 1995 (Bristol City Council) Air Conservation Area, Designation 10430 Quality Direction 2020 10812 Reading Borough Council, Castle Hill/Russell Royal Mail Overseas Post Scheme 1 July 2020 Environment Act 1995 (Gateshead Council and Street/Oxford Road Conservation Area 10814 Newcastle City Council)
    [Show full text]