DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Fig. 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplemental Fig. 4 21 1 563 (45) R1a2b Kazakhs Kazakhs Kaz1 46 24 3 564 (146) R1a2b Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR40 148 22 2 569 (109) R1a2b Bengali West-Bengal Beng2 110 27 2 571 (107) R1a2b Gupta Uttar-Pradesh Gupta1 108 19 5 560 (116) R1a2b Middle-caste Orissa OrMc1 117 3 574 18 (141) R1a2b Kurmi Uttar-Pradesh Kurmi1 143 29 0 585 0 573 (82) R1a2b Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk1 83 39 (274) R1a2b Cossacks Cossacks Cosk2 284 27 0 586 (88) R1a2 Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk2 89 31 (47) R1a2 Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch2 48 0 584 10 (222) R1a2c Altaians Altaians Altai5 230 24546 5 0 587 (84) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz2 85 3 545 2 0 544 (22) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz4 22 3 (89) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz3 90 39 1 588 1 580 (15) R1a2 Assyrians Assyrians Assyr1 15 30 (93) R1a2 Ashkenazi-Jews Ashkenazi-Jews ISR10 94 115 (73) R1a2d Balkars Balkars Balkar2 74 35 1 589 (148) R1a2d Mumbai-Jews Mumbai Israel42 150 2 0 590 23 547 (23) R1a2d Shugnan Tajiks Shugn1 23 4 0 583 (245) R1a2d Circassians Circassians Cirkas3 253 0 592 24 (90) R1a2d Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR01 91 0 591 31 1 579 (81) R1a2d Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch1 82 27 (272) R1a2d Azerbaijanis Azerbaijanis Azerb24 282 44 (120) R1a2 Iranians Iranians Iran3 121 2 0 582 23 542 (74) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai3 75 3 (142) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai4 144 5 570 3 (80) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ2 81 18550 7 0 549 (86) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ1 87 1 (87) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ3 88 2 581 25 2 559 (242) R1a1c Hungarians Hungarians Hun 3 250 16 0 561 (268) R1a1c Cossacks Kuban Cossacks CoskK2 276 19 6 562 (20) R1a1c Ukrainians north Ukrainians UkrN1 20 29 (265) R1a1c Ukrainians east Ukrainians UkrnE3 273 3 558 13 2 572 12551 (30) R1a1c Mordvins Mordvins Mord2 31 18 (263) R1a1c Ukrainians east Ukrainians UkrnE2 271 0 576 42 (267) R1a1c Ukrainians west Ukrainians UkrnW3 275 16 (5) R1a1d Tatars Tatars Tatar3 5 22 548 15 4 543 (244) R1a1d Circassians Circassians Cirkas2 252 22 (273) R1a1d Cossacks Cossacks Cosk1 283 3 577 30 6 557 (243) R1a1e Swedes Swedes Swe1 251 128578 28 4 568 (275) R1a1e Swedes Swedes Swe2 285 25 (234) R1a1e Saami Saami Saami6 242 14 0 575 14552 (105) R1a1b Russians-Central Russians RusRz1 106 22 1 565 (252) R1a1b Ukrainians east Ukrainians UkrnE1 260 25 (130) R1a1b Estonians Estonians Est27 132 6 567 30 (266) R1a1a Ukrainians west Ukrainians UkrnW2 274 13 1 566 1 554 (27) R1a1a Karelians Karelians Karel1 27 19 31541 (144) R1a1a Karelians Karelians Karel2 146 9 556 12 (104) R1a1a Russians-West Russians RusPs2 105 1 555 4 1 553 (21) R1a1a Russians-North Russians RusPi2 21 12 (230) R1a1a Komis Komis Komi2 238 31 (102) R1a2d Bashkirs Bashkirs Bashk4 103 142 (85) R1b15 Tajiks Tajiks Tajik1 86 14 90 522 (61) R1b13 Bashkirs Bashkirs Bashk3 62 18 17 (269) R1b13 Mongolians Mongols Mong4 279 540 36 1 532 (36) R1b11 Tabasarans Tabasarans Tabas17 37 49 0 533 (121) R1b11 Kurdistan-Jews Kurdistan-Jews Israel43 122 44 35538 0 534 (40) R1b11 Avars Avars Avar9 41 45 (16) R1b11 Assyrians Assyrians Assyr3 16 44539 3 531 8 535 18 (262) R1b11 Armenians Armenians Armen1 270 35 10 525 (60) R1b11 Turkey-Jews Turkey-Jews ISR31 61 22 64536 (124) R1b11 Moroccan-Jews Moroccan-Jews Israel48 125 30 (264) R1b8 Ukrainians west Ukrainians UkrnW1 272 36 10530 1 526 (65) R1b1 Ashkenazi-Jews Ashkenazi-Jews ISR38 66 29 (123) R1b1 Christian-Arabs-Israel Arabs CArab2 124 1 529 26 (126) R1b3 Germans Germans Ger3 127 1 528 36 (56) R1b3 Mordvins Mordvins Mord1 57 0 527 2 26524 (174) R1b3 Colla Andean-HA AndT7 181 3 (184) R1b3 Colla Andean-HA AndT13 191 77 (100) R2 Iranian-Jews Iranian-Jews ISR23 101 140 498 66 96537 (117) R2a Brahmin Uttar-Pradesh Brahm1 118 12496 58 (108) R2a Santhal Jharkhand Santh1 109 0 495 15 37425 (106) R2a Thakur Uttar-Pradesh Thak1 107 17 (115) R2a Brahmin Uttar-Pradesh Brahm2 116 0 5 400 (205) Q2b Koryaks Koryaks KrkG11 213 3 2 401 (209) Q2b Koryaks Koryaks KrkG55 217 13 125402 (226) Q2b Koryaks Koryaks KrkG13 234 77 6 494 (228) Q2b Koryaks Koryaks KrkG14 236 113 20 521 (183) Q2c Murut Murut Murut19 190 1 (249) Q2a Turkmens Turkmens TrkUzb1 257 179 417 3 1 416 (250) Q2a Turkmens Turkmens TrkUzb2 258 5 (251) Q2a Turkmens Turkmens TrkUzb3 259 44 523 63 92 491 (54) Q1d Croats Croats croat11 55 77 (240) Q1d Brahmin Nepalese NepBr1 248 20 16424 (7) Q1c Selkups Selkups Selkp3 7 1 39 18 519 520 23487 (8) Q1c Kets Kets Ket1 8 36 58 492 (52) Q1c Kets Kets Ket2 53 63 (236) Q1c Uzbek Uzbek Uzbk3 244 35 507 111 (188) Q1a Eskimo Eskimo Esk2 195 104 13506 (153) Q1a Cachi Andean-Cachi Cachi4 155 92 (134) Q1a Cachi Andean-Cachi Cachi3 136 1 505 15 497 82 (185) Q1a Colla Andean-HA AndS11 192 96 1 504 (176) Q1a Colla Andean-HA AndT12 183 8 86421 (137) Q1a Wichi Andean-LA Wichi3 139 0 503 1 4 1 518 501 (138) Q1a Wichi Andean-LA Wichi4 140 124 (175) Q1a Colla Andean-HA AndS41 182 0 502 9 (136) Q1a Cachi Andean-Cachi Cachi5 138 74486 11 (139) Q1a Colla Andean-HA Colla4 141 0 485 0 14422 (200) Q1a Colla Andean-HA AndS23 208 4 (201) Q1a Colla Andean-HA AndS47 209 333 (292) P2 Agta Agta Agta1 302 14 32342 (287) M1c Kosipe Kosipe Kosip1 297 19 295375 (291) M1c Kosipe Kosipe Kosip3 301 37 (290) M1c Kosipe Kosipe Kosip2 300 4 515 322 1 513 (131) S2 Lebbo Lebbo Lebb2 133 354 2 514 (135) S1 Bajo Bajo Bajo17 137 10 348339 (281) S3a1 Aeta Aeta Aeta1 291 9 (282) S3a1 Aeta Aeta Aeta2 292 45 7 391 (111) O2a2 Gond Madhya-Pradesh Gond1 112 46 1 394 (152) O2a2 Lebbo Lebbo Lebb1 154 48 0 393 (173) O2a2 Dusun Dusun Dusun7 180 45 30395 (179) O2a2 Dusun Dusun Dusun12 186 41 (112) O2a2 Ho Jharkhand Ho1 113 3 392 15 167 1 517 407 34381 (172) O2a2 Vietnamese south Vietnamese VietS2 179 9 (178) O2a2 Vietnamese south Vietnamese VietS1 185 50 39 390 (170) O2a1 Vietnamese north Vietnamese VietN4 177 3 488 48 (171) O2a1 Vietnamese south Vietnamese VietS3 178 142 0 419 (280) O1a Agta Agta Agta3 290 114 (295) O1b Agta Agta Agta2 305 125 420 39 (284) O1c Batak Batak Batak2 294 78389 30 57 489 (181) O1c Murut Murut Murut6 188 5 388 29 3 387 (182) O1c Murut Murut Murut13 189 33 (283) O1c Batak Batak Batak1 293 175 (177) O3e Igorot Igorot Igrt1 184 80 56478 96 404 (151) O3i Bajo Bajo Bajo21 153 40 (285) O3i Batak Batak Batak3 295 30475 122 (218) O3b Burmese Burmese Burm15 226 16474 53 (167) O3a1 Burmese Burmese Burm12 174 81403 40 (169) O3a1 Burmese Burmese Burm20 176 13398 43 (165) O3a1 Burmese Burmese Burm8 172 1 397 29 8 396 (164) O3a1 Burmese Burmese Burm3 171 40 (168) O3a1 Burmese Burmese Burm4 175 5 46 500 9 427 (193) N2a1a Evenks Evenki Evk55 200 7 3 430 (224) N2a1a Yakuts Kr Yakuts YakK4 232 10 3 432 (270) N2a1a Mongolians Mongols Mong5 280 7 8 429 (143) N2a1a Tuvinians Tuvinians Tuva1 145 7 8 434 (160) N2a1a Tuvinians Tuvinians Tuva2 167 23 (70) N2a1 Evens Sakha Even EvenS3 71 1 433 5 (67) N2a1a Tundra-Nenets Nenets NentT1 68 0 435 14428 11 2 426 (58) N2a1a Forest-Nenets Nenets NenetF3 59 16 84 436 (66) N2a1a Tundra-Nenets Nenets NentT2 67 32 (293) N2a1 Udmurds Udmurds Udmrd3 303 25 11 431 (32) N2a1 Maris Maris Mari3 33 17 (276) N2a1 Vepsas Vepsas Veps4 286 77 154473 (221) N3b Shor Shor Shor1 229 11 6 437 (31) N3a1 Maris Maris Mari1 32 10 17440 (229) N3a1 Udmurds Udmurds Udmrd4 237 12 26 461 (3) N3a1 Udmurds Udmurds Udmrd2 3 11516 28 42472 (53) N3a1 Maris Maris Mari2 54 7 1 445 (202) N3a2 Yakuts Kr Yakuts YakK3 210 3 4 446 (210) N3a2 Yakuts Yakuts YakM1 218 4 19454 (33) N3a2 Yakuts Sakha Yakuts YakS8 34 13 10 469 (69) N3a2 Evens Sakha Even EvenS2 70 19 26 471 (155) N3a2 Lebanese Lebanese Lebn1 157 10 2 457 (158) N3a3a Estonians Estonians Est2 162 11 1 458 (235) N3a3a Latvians Latvians Lat2 243 22 2 460 (259) N3a3a Latvians Latvians Lat3 267 3 18 462 (118) N3a3a Russians-West Russians RusPs1 119 15 (194) N3a3a Evens Magadan Even Evn31 201 2 7 470 464 21 1 451 (157) N3a3b Estonians Estonians Est6 161 21 17 452 (159) N3a3b Estonians Estonians Est21 164 1 466 10 4 447 (232) N3a3b Saami Saami Saami4 240 8 (233) N3a3b Saami Saami Saami5 241 31 (46) N3a3 Russians-North Russians RusPi1 47 1 8 444 (161) N3a4 Estonians Estonians Est17 168 0 9 455 (163) N3a4 Estonians Estonians Est20 170 15468 12 3 459 (260) N3a4 Karelians Karelians Karel3 268 5 18 463 (145) N3a4 Vepsas Vepsas Veps2 147 34 (79) N3a4 Cossacks Kuban Cossacks CoskK1 80 5 10439 (203) N3a5 Buryats Buryat Bur406 211 4 1 448 (211) N3a5 Buryats Buryat Bur336 219 0 467 9 3 450 (257) N3a5 Kazakhs Kazakhs Kaz3 265 17 (83) N3a5 Mongolians Mongols Mong1 84 17 1 449 453 17 (271) N3a5 Mongolians Mongols Mong6 281 18 (247) N3a5 Mongolians Mongols Mong2 255 6 512 2 465 3 17 438 (191) N3a5 Chukchis Chukchis Chuk9 198 2 (225) N3a5 Koryaks Koryaks KrkG294 233 15 456 5 (206) N3a5 Koryaks Koryaks KrkG152 214 9 443 5 (189) N3a5 Eskimo Eskimo Esk3 196 2 442 4 1 441 (190) N3a5 Chukchis Chukchis Chuk5 197 2 (207) N3a5 Koryaks Koryaks KrkG233 215 52 257384 (6) L1b Tatars Tatars Tatar2 6 57 22 509 (62) L1b Druze Druze ISR34 63 32 275376 (95) T1a1 Georgian-Jews Georgian-Jews ISR13 96 25 (96) T1a1 Muslim-Arabs-Israel Arabs MArab1 97 7 11348 (19) I2a Croats Croats croat12 19 4 1 356 (55) I2a Croats Croats croat13 56 17 0 357 (26) I2a Chuvashes Chuvashes Chuv1 26 15 1 358 (129) I2a Lithuanians Lithuanians Lit2 130 7 143 7 353 (28) I2a Belarusians Belarusians BelaR1 28 359 10 (35) I2a Belarusians Belarusians BelaR3 36 32423 11 (162) I2a Vepsas Vepsas Veps3 169 171 109 (261) I3 Georgians Georgians Georg1 269 479 23 14347 (4) I1c Mordvins Mordvins Mord3 4 19 172 361 (29) I1c Komis Komis Komi1 29 31 1 360 (59) I1b Belarusians Belarusians BelaR2 60 37 (128) I1a Hungarians Hungarians Hun2 129 57 7 383 (14) J2a8 Iranians Iranians Iran1 14 70 61385 (75) J2a8 Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz1 76 71 1 414 (246) J2a9 Kabardins Kabardins Kabard3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Song Traditions of the Volga-Ural Tatars in the 21St Century: Issues in the Transmission of Historic Singing Styles Nailya Almeeva
    Song Traditions of the Volga-Ural Tatars in the 21st Century: Issues in the Transmission of Historic Singing Styles Nailya Almeeva In the 20th century ethnic music attracted this has long been a phenomenon of revival great interest. With increasing ease of travel performance of folklore in live performance, not and communication, countries and continents by the bearers of folklore musical thinking and seemed to become closer, and access to original hearing but, loosely speaking, by those who folk material became ever easier. Ethnic music learned it. Understanding the value of the original could now be found not only in print but in live sound of ritual (time-bound) singing, one cannot performance, on television and on the internet. remain indiff erent to its revival, particularly once As a result, the whole spectrum of methods and one is aware of what can be lost during such types of intoning (a term introduced by Izaly revival. Zemtsovsky (1981: 87), which means types of voice Globalisation and the mass media have had a production) and sounding techniques of the oral particularly negative eff ect on ritual (time-bound) tradition could be experienced, even without genres and on the types of folklore dependent leaving home. Many of the methods bear the on a traditional way of life, on pre-industrial ways characteristics common for earlier, sometimes of production and on the natural environment. very ancient, historic epochs. In those places where these have ceased, ritual Traditional societies became urbanised, and folklore fades and eventually disappears. the all-permeating eff ects of the mass media The issues described above apply to the ritual overwhelmed the traditional ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier
    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts English
    International Symposium: Interaction of Turkic Languages and Cultures Abstracts Saule Tazhibayeva & Nevskaya Irina Turkish Diaspora of Kazakhstan: Language Peculiarities Kazakhstan is a multiethnic and multi-religious state, where live more than 126 representatives of different ethnic groups (Sulejmenova E., Shajmerdenova N., Akanova D. 2007). One-third of the population is Turkic ethnic groups speaking 25 Turkic languages and presenting a unique model of the Turkic world (www.stat.gov.kz, Nevsakya, Tazhibayeva, 2014). One of the most numerous groups are Turks deported from Georgia to Kazakhstan in 1944. The analysis of the language, culture and history of the modern Turkic peoples, including sub-ethnic groups of the Turkish diaspora up to the present time has been carried out inconsistently. Kazakh researchers studied history (Toqtabay, 2006), ethno-political processes (Galiyeva, 2010), ethnic and cultural development of Turkish diaspora in Kazakhstan (Ibrashaeva, 2010). Foreign researchers devoted their studies to ethnic peculiarities of Kazakhstan (see Bhavna Dave, 2007). Peculiar features of Akhiska Turks living in the US are presented in the article of Omer Avci (www.nova.edu./ssss/QR/QR17/avci/PDF). Features of the language and culture of the Turkish Diaspora in Kazakhstan were not subjected to special investigation. There have been no studies of the features of the Turkish language, with its sub- ethnic dialects, documentation of a corpus of endangered variants of Turkish language. The data of the pre-sociological surveys show that the Kazakh Turks self-identify themselves as Turks Akhiska, Turks Hemshilli, Turks Laz, Turks Terekeme. Unable to return to their home country to Georgia Akhiska, Hemshilli, Laz Turks, Terekeme were scattered in many countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Haplotype Frequencies at the DRD2 Locus in Populations of the East European Plain
    BMC Genetics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Haplotype frequencies at the DRD2 locus in populations of the East European Plain Olga V Flegontova*1, Andrey V Khrunin1, OlgaILylova1, Larisa A Tarskaia1, Victor A Spitsyn2, Alexey I Mikulich3 and Svetlana A Limborska1 Address: 1Department of Human Molecular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 2Medical and Genetics Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia and 3Institute of Arts, Ethnography and Folklore, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus Email: Olga V Flegontova* - [email protected]; Andrey V Khrunin - [email protected]; Olga I Lylova - [email protected]; Larisa A Tarskaia - [email protected]; Victor A Spitsyn - [email protected]; Alexey I Mikulich - [email protected]; Svetlana A Limborska - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 September 2009 Received: 9 March 2009 Accepted: 30 September 2009 BMC Genetics 2009, 10:62 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-10-62 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/62 © 2009 Flegontova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: It was demonstrated previously that the three-locus RFLP haplotype, TaqI B-TaqI D-TaqI A (B-D-A), at the DRD2 locus constitutes a powerful genetic marker and probably reflects the most ancient dispersal of anatomically modern humans. Results: We investigated TaqI B, BclI, MboI, TaqI D, and TaqI A RFLPs in 17 contemporary populations of the East European Plain and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 7 (2011 4) 919-929 ~ ~ ~ УДК 81-114.2 The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium Olga V. Felde* Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1 Received 4.07.2011, received in revised form 11.07.2011, accepted 18.07.2011 This article presents the up-to-date view of ethno-linguistic situation in polylanguage and polycultural the Krasnoyarsk Territory. The functional typology of languages of this Siberian region has been given; historical and proper linguistic causes of disequilibrum of linguistic situation have been developed; the objects for further study of this problem have been specified. Keywords: majority language, minority languages, native languages, languages of ethnic groups, diaspora languages, communicative power of the languages. Point Krasnoyarsk Territory which area (2339,7 thousand The study of ethno-linguistic situation in square kilometres) could cover the third part of different parts of the world, including Russian Australian continent. Sociolinguistic examination Federation holds a prominent place in the range of of the Krasnoyarsk Territory is important for the problems of present sociolinguistics. This field of solution of a number of the following theoretical scientific knowledge is represented by the works and practical objectives: for revelation of the of such famous scholars as V.M. Alpatov (1999), characteristics of communicative space of the A.A. Burikin (2004), T.G. Borgoyakova (2002), country and its separate regions, for monitoring V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 25 (S) Jul. 2017 Vol
    Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 25 (S) Jul. 2017 Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Contents Vectors and Narrative Discourses of Modern Society 1 Multicultural Persons in the Variative Discourse of Electronic Informative Society Identity Irina S. Karabulatova, Khanif S. Vildanov, Anastasiya A. Zinchenko, Elena N. Vasilishina and Anatoly P. Vassilenko Social and Economic Differentiation of the Issues Affecting the Health 17 of Modern Russians Vlada V. Sharipova, Chulpan F. Gabidullina, Svetlana V. Lobova, Natalya V. Shevchenko, Pavel A. Smelov and Galina M. Rossinskaya Features of Leadership Development of Kazakhstan Elementary 31 School Pupils Botagul A. Turgunbaeva, Gulmira R. Aspanova, Altynbek K. Moshkalov, Asan Abdrakhmanov, Gulnara K. Abdrahman and Alima T. Kenzhebayeva Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities The Direction of Transformation of Information and Communication 45 Technology (ICT) at the Present Stage of Development into an Electronic 2017 25 (S) Jul. Vol. and Information Society Faiz F. Khizbullin, Tatyana G. Sologub, Svetlana V. Bulganina, Tatiana E. Lebedeva, Vladimir S. Novikov and Victoria V. Prokhorova The Problem of Fixation of Siberian Endangered Languages in the 59 Multimedia Corpus: Evidence from the Siberian Tatars Tyumen Region Dialect Guzel Z. Fayzullina, Elena N. Ermakova, Alsina A. Fattakova and Habiba S. Shagbanova Problems of Inclusive Education of Disabled Children in the Context 73 of Integration into Modern Society Zinaida V. Polivara, Marziya P. Asylbekova, Olga N. Budeeva, Galina A. Zabirova, Leonid I. Kim and Maira S. Dzhilkishieva VOL. 25 (S) JUL. 2017 Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities The Modern Problems of Communication and Social Interaction of 89 A special issue devoted to Deviant Teenagers Using Social Networks Vectors & Narrative Discourses of Modern Society Irina V.
    [Show full text]
  • Folksongs of the Turkic World
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, November 2016, Vol. 6, No. 11, 1343-1370 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2016.11.008 D DAVID PUBLISHING Folksongs of the Turkic World János Sipos Institute for Musicology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary The long-term goal of my research has been to systematize and compare by musical criteria the folk songs of Turkic groups and ethnicities living around them. Here I rarely touch on instrumental folk music, the repertoire of professional or semi-professional performers, the most recent strata, seldom or just occasionally discuss art music and the cultural, social and anthropological implications of music are only sporadically considered, too. There are close connections between the languages of Turkic groups but their musical stocks are fundamentally different. Actually, that is not surprising, because these people are, at least in part, Turkified, and through their substrata (that is people absorbed by them) they are in genetic and cultural relations with several non-Turkic peoples. My research therefore has repercussions; apart from the Turkic-speaking peoples tied by culture, language and history, upon their neighbors and partly absorbed other peoples, creating the foundation for an even broader future comparative ethnomusicological research of Eurasian groups. This paper is aimed to provide a very short summary about the findings of my field researches into the folk music of different Turkic-speaking people between 1987 and 2015. I introduce the sources, the collecting work and the methods of processing and analyzing the songs. I also give an analytical introduction to the folksong of Anatolian Turks, Azeris, Turkmens, Uzbeks (and Tajiks), Karachay-Balkars, Kazakhs, Kyrgyzs, a Sufi Turkish community in Thrace and the area of the Volga-Kama-Belaya region.
    [Show full text]
  • Music of Central Asia and of the Volga-Ural Peoples. Teaching Aids for the Study of Inner Asia No
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 295 874 SO 019 077 AUTHOR Slobin, Mark TITLE Music of Central Asia and of the Volga-Ural Peoples. Teaching Aids for the Study of Inner Asia No. 5. INSTITUTION Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Asian Studies Research Inst. SPONS AGENCY Association for Asian Studies, .an Arbor, Mich. PUB DATE 77 NOTE 68p. AVAILABLE FROMAsian Studies Research Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 ($3.00). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Area Studies; *Asian History; *Asian Studies; Cultural Education; Culture; Foreign Countries; Foreign Culture; Higher Education; Instructional Materials; *Music; Musical Instruments; Music Education; *Non Western Civilization; Resource Materials; Resource Units; Secondary Education; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS *Asia (Central).; *Asia (Volga Ural Region); Folk Music; USSR ABSTRACT The music of the peoples who inhabit either Central Asia or the Volga-Ural region of Asia is explored in this document, which provides information that can be incorporated into secondary or higher education courses. The Central Asian music cultures of the Kirghiz, Kazakhs, Turkmens, Karakalpaks, Uighurs, Tajiks, and Uzbeks are described and compared through examinations of: (1) physical environmental factors; (2) cultural patterns; (3) history; (4) music development; and (5) musical instruments. The music of the Volga-Ural peoples, who comprise the USSR nationalities of the Mari (Cheremis), Chuvash, Udmurts (Votyaks), Mordvins, Bashkirs, Tatars, and Kalmucks, is examined, with an emphasis on differences in musical instruments. A 13-item bibliography of Central Asian music and a 17-item Volga-Ural music bibliography are included. An appendix contains examples of musical scores from these regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Science Journal 2014;11(7S) Http
    Life Science Journal 2014;11(7s) http://www.lifesciencesite.com Some results of the research system-synchronous modern dialect of the Tatar language Ferits Yusupovich Yusupov and Irina Sovetovna Karabulatova Kazan Federal University, Tatarstan str, 2, Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation Abstract. This article analyzes the study of modern dialects of the Tatar language. The authors were carried out dialectological expeditions over the years of various regions of residing Tatars. The authors have drawn parallels with the different groups of Turkic languages. The specific layer is highlighted in the diasystem, which we nominally call as oguzizms. They belong to archaism category and have the anachronistic character. Their presence in all specific systems shows that these forms were frequently used, but later they were superseded by “rival” forms. It seems probable that these forms were derived from old-Kipchak language. Nowadays they are considered as the old-Turkic layer of origins. The authors provide new classification parameters to allocate Tatar dialects. [Yusupov F.Y., Karabulatova I.S. Some results of the research system-synchronous modern dialect of the Tatar language Life Sci J 2014;11(7s):246-] (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com. 50 Keywords: Turkology, Tatar language, modern dialect, Classificatory features of dialects, verb Introduction the formation of infinitive forms from archaic action Researchers are studying the Turkic nouns (as uku faydaly / reading is useful) and languages from different positions. However, the main participles. The formation of participles became line of research is based on the ethnography of complicated by means of additional morphological speaking and contrastive linguistics. The first is features as a result of grammatical designation of directed represented widely in the American studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policy in the Russian Federation: Language Diversity and National Identity
    Language Policy in the Russian Federation: language diversity and national identity by Marc Leprêtre Abstract This paper gives an overview on the different language policies implemented in the Russian Federation, stressing the relevance of the historical background, the relations between language and nationalism, and language promotion as a tool for preventing inter-ethnic conflicts and for ensuring a peaceful and balanced linguistic diversity. The text is structured in four sections: historical overview (language policy and nation-building in the USSR); interethnic tensions in the Russian Federation in the post-Soviet context; the awakening of national groups in Russia; and strategies for a peaceful and balanced management of linguistic diversity in the Russian Federation and the Soviet successor states. 1 1. Historical overview: language policy and nation-building in the USSR The processes of language planning and language policy carried on since 1991 in the Russian Federation can't be explained without a short reference to the historical, political and social outcomes raised by the nationality and language policies implemented during decades in the former USSR. Nevertheless, insofar as the topic of this paper is what is going on nowadays regarding the management of language diversity, I will try to summarize this historical background2. The ideological bases of the Soviet nationality policies and the process of nationalization3 implemented in the republics had a rather paradoxical character as far as on the one hand the Soviet regime entitled the nationalities with a well-defined political and territorial status -even for those which had not yet reached a pre-capitalist level of development- which led to a process of nation-building where political and territorial units were created on the basis of nations that constituted themselves as historical cultural communities during the Tsarist period, contrary to what had been the usual pattern in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalities and Conflicting Ethnicity in Post-Communist Russia
    UNITED NATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DP 50 NATIONALITIES AND CONFLICTING ETHNICITY IN POST-COMMUNIST RUSSIA by Valery Tishkov UNRISD Discussion Papers are preliminary documents circulated in a limited number of copies to stimulate discussion and critical comment. March 1994 1 The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency that engages in multi-disciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research themes include: Crisis, Adjustment and Social Change; Socio-Economic and Political Consequences of the International Trade in Illicit Drugs; Environment, Sustainable Development and Social Change; Integrating Gender into Development Policy; Participation and Changes in Property Relations in Communist and Post-Communist Societies; and Political Violence and Social Movements. UNRISD research projects focused on the 1995 World Summit for Social Development
    [Show full text]