Sir John Davies, Orchestra Brief Chronicles VII (2016) Ii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sir John Davies, Orchestra Brief Chronicles VII (2016) Ii Brief Chronicles VII (2016) i All of nature dances.... -Sir John Davies, Orchestra Brief Chronicles VII (2016) ii e Copyright 2016 The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship Designed in Baltimore, MD Online ISSN: 2157-6793 Print ISSN: 2157-6785 o This final 2016 volume VII of Brief Chronicles, in keeping with our tradition, was set in Chaparral Pro. Our ornament selection continues to be inspired not only by early modern semiotics, but by the generosity of contemporary designers. We've been sneaking in glyphs of Satanus Humanum Salvator, BD Renaissance, DeiGratia and EileenCaps on the sly — and in this issue, suitably, Papyrus. All these, in addition to our original lineup of Rob Anderson's Flight of the Dragon Celtic Knot Caps, and T. Olsson’s 1993 Ornament Scrolls, available for free download from typOasis, have finally furnished an inviting opportunity to apply some of the theoretical principles discussed by our more disting- uished con- tributors. dump trump please god Brief Chronicles VII (2016) iii General Editor: Roger Stritmatter, PhD, Coppin State University Managing Editor: Michael Delahoyde, PhD, Washington State University Editorial Board: Carole Chaski, PhD, Institute for Linguistic Evidence Ren Draya, PhD, Blackburn College Sky Gilbert, PhD, University of Guelph, Canada Geoffrey M. Hodgson, PhD, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom Mike Hyde, PhD, English, Tufts University Felicia Hardison Londré, PhD, University of Missouri, Kansas City Donald Ostrowski, PhD, Harvard University Tom Regnier, JD, LLM, University of Miami School of Law Don Rubin, Professor, York University Sarah Smith, PhD, Harvard University Richard Waugaman, MD, Georgetown University of Medicine and Washington Psychoanalytic Institute Copy Editor: Alex McNeil, JD, Boston College i Brief Chronicles VII (2016) iv Contributor Biographies Elke Brackmann studied English and German at the University of Innsbruck. Being a grammar school teacher in Innsbruck and later Wuppertal for years, she has repeatedly performed Shakespeare plays both with A-level students and younger ones. She embraced the Oxfordian cause in her fifties and, together with Robert Detobel, is working on the project “A Biographical Approach to the Sonnets” for EFL-Students. At present she is also co-chair of the Neue Shakespeare-Gesellschaft (www.Shakespeare-today.de), with Hanno Wember. Robert Detobel is a translator and scholar based in Frankfurt, Germany. He is co- editor (with Dr. Uwe Laugwitz) of the Neues Shakspeare-speare Journal, published annually in Germany since 1997. Author of the book, Wie aus William Shaxsper William Shakespeare wurde (How William Shaxsper became William Shakespeare) (2005), Detobel has appeared in The Elizabethan Review and The Oxfordian, among other scholarly publications. Together with the late K.C. Ligon, he is co-author of the book Shakespeare and The Concealed Poet (2010). This is his third appearance in Brief Chronicles. Kevin Gilvary obtained his BA and MA in Classics and later his MA in Applied Lin- guistics from the University of Southampton, UK. He has taught at UBC in Vancouver, BC, Canada, at Markham College, Lima, Peru, and for twenty years at Barton Peveril College, Hampshire, UK. He was first alerted to the Authorship Question by inquisitive students and has been a member of the De Vere Society for fifteen years, and recently served as DVS chairman. He has contributed articles to Great Oxford (2004) and edited Dating Shakespeare’s Plays (2010) for which he was awarded the prize of Oxfordian of the Year at a joint SF/SOS meeting in 2011. In 2015 he obtained his doctorate from Brunel University London with the thesis “Shakespearean Biografiction: How modern biographers rely on context, conjecture and inference to construct a life of the nBar- nod.” Richard Malim is a retired English lawyer with over twenty-five years interest and study of the Authorship Question. In 2003 he became secretary of the De Vere Society (www.deveresociety), and was the editor of Great Oxford: Essays on the Life and Work of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (2004), a collection of essays to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the death of Oxford. In 2011 he published The Earl of Oxford and the Making of “Shakespeare”: The Literary Life of Edward de Vere in Context, a book that seeks to contextualize de Vere's life in the context of the history and development of English Literature. The De Vere Society is kind enough Brief Chronicles VII (2016) v to publish an annual cumulative supplement on its website. Carolyn Morris holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Medical Technology. She has been an Oxfordian since 1989, and for the past five years has studied the satires of the late 1590s, focusing on Joseph Hall’s Virgidemiarum (1599). In 2013, she published an article in The Oxfordian, “Did Joseph Hall and Ben Jonson Identify Oxford as Shakespeare?” She has been a Reader at the Folger Library, The Library of Congress and has interacted with the Huntington Library and the British Library in pursuing this research as an independent scholar. James A. Warren was a Foreign Service officer with the U.S. Department of State for more than twenty years, during which he served in public diplomacy positions at U.S. embassies and consulates in eight countries, mostly in Asia. Following his career with the State Department he served as Executive Director of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training (ADST) and then as Regional Director for Southeast Asia for the Institute of International Education (IIE). In 2013 he received the Vero Nihil Verius Award for Distinguished Shakespearean Scholarship from Concordia University (Portland, Oregon) for his accomplishment as the editor of An Index to Oxfordian Publications. He is a Fellow with the Center for the Study of the Great Ideas and the Adler-Aquinas Institute. Richard Waugaman, MD, is a Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Georgetown University School of Medicine, a Training Analyst Emeritus at the Washington Psychoanalytic Institute, and a recognized expert on multiple personality disorder. He is a regular reader at the Folger Shakespeare Library, and has written extensively on Shakespeare, the psychology of anonymity, and the case for Oxford’s authorship of the Shakespearean canon. Brief Chronicles VII (2016) vi Brief Chronicles VII (2016) vii Vol. VII (2016) Table of Contents Articles Who Wrote the First Biography of Shakespeare? It was not Nicholas Rowe in 1709! Kevin Gilvary 1-15 Greed and Generosity in the Shakespearean Question Richard M. Waugaman 17-32 An Arrogant Joseph Hall and an Angry Edward de Vere in Virgidemiarum [1599] Carolyn Morris 33-82 Teaching the Sonnets and de Vere’s Biography at School – Opportunities and Risks Elke Brackmann and Robert Detobel 83-110 Oxford and The Arte of English Poesie Richard Malim 111-130 Edward de Vere: Translator of Johan Sturm’s A Ritch Storehouse or Treasurie for Nobilitie and Gentlemen? Richard M. Waugaman 131-146 Engaging Academia: Some Thoughts James Warren 147-178 Exchange of Letters between James Warren and John Shahan 179-184 d Brief Chronicles VII (2016) viii Brief Chronicles VII (2016) ix Farewell….and Hello Again. othing better commends a writing to an editor than one that follows the standards established by the journal, including, but not limited to, adherence Nto the journal’s style sheet. A good article, moreover, conducts a thorough and impartial job of canvassing the relevant scholarship – what has been said before, by others, about the topic being considered. After a judicious summary, it offers some- thing unexpected or novel, raising new points of fact or applying new methods of in- terpretation to resolve outstanding ambiguities or problems. Still better, the submis- sion that can turn the history of the scholarship on a topic to advantage in an inter- pretation or a debate will always win against one that is seen to ignore vital sources of possible contradiction or interpretative conflict for fear that these perspectives may fail to support the author’s primary contentions. Above all, a good academic article is self-critical – that is, it displays a constant vigilance with respect to the possibility of error and a humility about what is still not known about a topic.1 Dealing with signif- cant contrary evidence by conspicuous omission does not work in the long run. That may sound harsh, but at age fifty-eight, after eight issues ofBC , and nineteen issues of Shakespeare Matters, I feel I deserve my chance to say it. The Oxfordian movement has seen styles come and go over time as different editors have assumed the responsibility of editing the various publications that now are official bibliographical entries in the history of the Shakespeare Underground (a term, for the record, I first used in 1991), as included in James A. Warren’s Index to Oxfordian Publications (2015) and other authorship bibliographies. When I joined the Shakespeare Oxford Society in 1991, Morse Johnson was still editing the newsletter on an IBM Selectric typewriter. His issues were full of great heart and vitality. Morse republished old materials that were difficult to find assembled anywhere else but contained much enlightenment, as well as a lively exchange of often very good articles, letters to the editor, and an occasional flight of fiction, by an ever-shifting mosaic of writers. The movement had been recently re-energized by the publication of Charlton Ogburn’s The Mysterious William Shakespeare, the archival work and publishing of Ruth Loyd Miller, the 1987 Moot Court at American University organized by David Lloyd Kreeger, and major authorship stories in The Atlantic and The New Yorker. Yet Johnson produced the newsletter on a Selectric, aided, as I recall, by his law firm secretary. Brief Chronicles VII (2016) x This was in 1991, almost a decade into the microcomputer revolution, which was putting professional desktop publishing tools, of the kind first used by Bill Boyle after he took over the job of editing the newsletter in 1996, into the hands of millions of desktop designers.
Recommended publications
  • Daily Iowan (Iowa City, Iowa), 1952-02-21
    On The Inside , The ' Weather 1IIl-'b' doud, &lUI con­ Sorority Ruahinq Schedule .. , Umaecl cold ....,. with. Paqa 3 oceuioDai 1Irh& mow 27 Game Baseball Card '" . Ouri_ • ..aI, dewI, '" Paqe' aDd Dol Ilaile _ eeId Car ..r ConfarancH at owan t"rida,. Jlirh &ocIa" 3.; ... Paqa 6 loW. 11. Wah WeUncia)", • %I; low, ZL Eat. 1868 - AP Lecued Wire. AP Wirepboto - Five Cents Iowa City. Iowa. Thuraday. February 21. 1952 - Vol. 86. No. 99 · n f . Clothing Salesman E, : ~ropean L/,e ,ense New Hero in Capture Senate Group Approves 1 l ' . UMT , . D bl Of Robber SuHon . is aln -' r;~ ~O em NEW YORK (II')-A tall, young I.'M . • clothing salesman with a memory Provides, for 81 [or faces fumed up Wednesday as Bill Plan :. " :" " o' u.n' CI the unsung hero In the capture of ( notorious Wlllie sutton. To Start by' Year's End Of NATO He is 24-year-old Arnold Schus­ WASHINGTON (II') - Universal military &ralning for 18-year­ , ter, who tipped ort Brooklyn , olds moved a long stride nearer reality Wednesday. , LISBON, Portugal (IP) - Atlantic Pact ministers met ill Lisbon pOlice Monday that a man he'd By a 12-0 vote, the senate armed 5eI'Vica committee approved a Io ·try to translate "armies on paper into armies in the field." The bill to permit the start of UMT before the end of the year. words were those of Secretary of State Dean Acheson Sutton/s Pal .Captured The correspondlnl house com· the Allied powers "What we have done 'so far mittee earlier had approved 3 unless we finish tbe job." ---'-------~-- NEW YORK (JP)-Pollce Com­ Today Is Last Day similar measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefactions
    BENEFACTIONS. LIST (.iV PKilSTClTAL BENEFACTIONS. MAIM-: T<> TH.K UNIVKKSITY OK MELBOURNE SINOK ITS FOUNDATION IN 1S53. ISM SI.'IISCRIHEUS CSir. <i. W. IIUMIKX) ,tS.r'C Shilki.'spi.-arc Seln'Iai'ship. l,;7i IIENKV Tnl.MAN IrWUiHT fil 101' Rrizns for History and Education. -, l EHWARI1 WILSON" , '' ' "i LAC 11 LAN MACKINNON. ' 10(10 Avails Scholarship in Enu'itiL'iM-iii--. 1ST:; 'SIR CKllltliE l-'EIKilisr r.V HnWEN 1UII I'r-izu for English Essay. 1*7:; JOHN HASTIE .... I,s7:i OODI-'REY IK>\\ ITX Ill, till (IClli'l'lll KlllliiU'llltlllt 1S7:; Sill. WILLIAM l-'OSTKI! STAWELL 'WOO Scholarships hi N'lilnral History, ISS7:". SIK. SAMUEL WlLS'iN ririi'i Scholarship hi lOnirin^i'rin^. !*>:; JOHN IUXSON WYSELASKIE - Hfr.llllir Erection nf Wilson Hull. is.vl WILLIAM THOMAS Mi 1I.I.IS1 IX xnlO Scholarships 1,<S1 StinSCRIIiERS .... rilluli Scholarships in .Modern Luii^iiiiffcs. P-S7 WILLIAM CHARLES EEliXnT - l.Mi I'ri/n for- Mathematics in memory nf I'rof. Wilson, ls>7 l-'liANCIS ORMOMIl -.alilo Scholarships for Physical and Chemical .Re.Keareli. isrni Hi'rHERT lil.XSIlN L'II.OOII I'iorcssorship of Music. 10,s:r7 Scholarships in Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics IS'" SLUSCIUDERS .... .•mil (-'.nuiiiL'i-'i'iii^. ,ri-17 Onnnnd Kxhihitions in Musi'-. IS!U JAMES CEIIKCiE HEAXEY :{!li.m Scholarships in Snrjrevy und Pathology. l.V.M I.1AVH1 KAY o7(;l .Caroline Kuy Scholarsnips, 1WI7 SUHSOlill.iERS 7;•'l,-l Research Scholarship in biology in memory of Sir .lames MacHain, I'.mj ROMERT ALEXANDER WHICHT lin'.o Prizes lor Music and ffir Mechanical Kn'.riiicel-inir.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Cambridge Shakespeare
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82544-3 - The Merchant of Venice Edited by M. M. Mahood Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE GENERAL EDITOR Brian Gibbons ASSOCIATE GENERAL EDITOR A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood. From 1990 to 1994 the General Editor was Brian Gibbons and the Associate General Editors were A. R. Braunmuller and Robin Hood. THE MERCHAnt OF VENICE The Merchant of Venice has been performed more often than any other comedy by Shakespeare. Molly Mahood pays special attention to the expectations of the play’s first audience, and to our modern experience of seeing and hearing the play. In a substantial new addition to the Introduction, Charles Edelman focuses on the play’s sex- ual politics and recent scholarship devoted to the position of Jews in Shakespeare’s time. He surveys the international scope and diversity of theatrical interpretations of The Merchant in the 1980s and 1990s and their different ways of tackling the troubling figure of Shylock. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82544-3 - The Merchant of Venice Edited by M. M. Mahood Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE All’s Well That Ends Well, edited by Russell Fraser Antony and Cleopatra, edited by David Bevington As You Like It, edited by Michael Hattaway The Comedy of Errors, edited by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Code De Conduite Pour Le Water Polo
    HistoFINA SWIMMING MEDALLISTS AND STATISTICS AT OLYMPIC GAMES Last updated in November, 2016 (After the Rio 2016 Olympic Games) Fédération Internationale de Natation Ch. De Bellevue 24a/24b – 1005 Lausanne – Switzerland TEL: (41-21) 310 47 10 – FAX: (41-21) 312 66 10 – E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.fina.org Copyright FINA, Lausanne 2013 In memory of Jean-Louis Meuret CONTENTS OLYMPIC GAMES Swimming – 1896-2012 Introduction 3 Olympic Games dates, sites, number of victories by National Federations (NF) and on the podiums 4 1896 – 2016 – From Athens to Rio 6 Olympic Gold Medals & Olympic Champions by Country 21 MEN’S EVENTS – Podiums and statistics 22 WOMEN’S EVENTS – Podiums and statistics 82 FINA Members and Country Codes 136 2 Introduction In the following study you will find the statistics of the swimming events at the Olympic Games held since 1896 (under the umbrella of FINA since 1912) as well as the podiums and number of medals obtained by National Federation. You will also find the standings of the first three places in all events for men and women at the Olympic Games followed by several classifications which are listed either by the number of titles or medals by swimmer or National Federation. It should be noted that these standings only have an historical aim but no sport signification because the comparison between the achievements of swimmers of different generations is always unfair for several reasons: 1. The period of time. The Olympic Games were not organised in 1916, 1940 and 1944 2. The evolution of the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • EDITING for PERFORMANCE: DR JOHNSON and the STAGE I Want
    Editing for performance... 75 EDITING FOR PERFORMANCE: DR JOHNSON AND THE STAGE Peter Holland Notre Dame University I want to begin by quoting one of Dr Johnson’s notes on Hamlet, a passage that, though entirely characteristic, may be less than familiar to many. Johnson is commenting on the punctuation of a passage and is concerned about a sequence of dashes towards the end of the play: To a literary friend of mine I am indebted for the following very acute observation: “Throughout this play,” says he, “there is nothing more beautiful than these dashes; by their gradual elongation, they distinctly mark the balbuciation and the increasing difficulty of utterance observable in a dying man.” To which let me add, that, although dashes are in frequent use with our tragic poets, yet they are seldom introduced with so good an effect as in the present instance. (qtd. in Wells 1: 69) Johnson’s reliance on others—and their cloaked identity—is something we are used to. So too Johnson’s yearning here both to generalize about tragic practice and to praise the particular local effect in Shakespeare can be paralleled frequently elsewhere. There is that precision that is Ilha do Desterro Florianópolis nº 49 p.075-098 jul./dez. 2005 76 Peter Holland also apparent in Johnson’s note on Ophelia’s reference to “a rope of onions”, a phrase that Pope had suggested emending to “a robe of onions”: Rope is, undoubtedly, the true reading. A rope of onions is a certain number of onions, which, for the convenience of portability, are, by the market-women, suspended from a rope: not, as the Oxford editor ingeniously, but improperly, supposes, in a bunch at the end, but by a perpendicular arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Pratchett's Discworld.” Mythlore: a Journal of J.R.R
    Háskóli Íslands School of Humanities Department of English Terry Pratchett’s Discworld The Evolution of Witches and the Use of Stereotypes and Parody in Wyrd Sisters and Witches Abroad B.A. Essay Claudia Schultz Kt.: 310395-3829 Supervisor: Valgerður Guðrún Bjarkadóttir May 2020 Abstract This thesis explores Terry Pratchett’s use of parody and stereotypes in his witches’ series of the Discworld novels. It elaborates on common clichés in literature regarding the figure of the witch. Furthermore, the recent shift in the stereotypical portrayal from a maleficent being to an independent, feminist woman is addressed. Thereby Pratchett’s witches are characterized as well as compared to the Triple Goddess, meaning Maiden, Mother and Crone. Additionally, it is examined in which way Pratchett adheres to stereotypes such as for instance of the Crone as well as the reasons for this adherence. The second part of this paper explores Pratchett’s utilization of different works to create both Wyrd Sisters and Witches Abroad. One of the assessed parodies are the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm as well as the effect of this parody. In Wyrd Sisters the presence of Grimm’s fairy tales is linked predominantly to Pratchett’s portrayal of his wicked witches. Whereas the parody of “Cinderella” and the fairy tale’s trope is central to Witches Abroad. Additionally, to the Brothers Grimm’s fairy tales, Pratchett’s parody of Shakespeare’s plays is central to the paper. The focus is hereby on the tragedies of Hamlet and Macbeth, which are imitated by the witches’ novels. While Witches Abroad can solely be linked to Shakespeare due to the main protagonists, Wyrd Sisters incorporates both of the aforementioned Shakespeare plays.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Theory of Tragedy: Aristotle's Poetics
    Greek Theory of Tragedy: Aristotle's Poetics The classic discussion of Greek tragedy is Aristotle's Poetics. He defines tragedy as "the imitation of an action that is serious and also as having magnitude, complete in itself." He continues, "Tragedy is a form of drama exciting the emotions of pity and fear. Its action should be single and complete, presenting a reversal of fortune, involving persons renowned and of superior attainments, and it should be written in poetry embellished with every kind of artistic expression." The writer presents "incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to interpret its catharsis of such of such emotions" (by catharsis, Aristotle means a purging or sweeping away of the pity and fear aroused by the tragic action). The basic difference Aristotle draws between tragedy and other genres, such as comedy and the epic, is the "tragic pleasure of pity and fear" the audience feel watching a tragedy. In order for the tragic hero to arouse these feelings in the audience, he cannot be either all good or all evil but must be someone the audience can identify with; however, if he is superior in some way(s), the tragic pleasure is intensified. His disastrous end results from a mistaken action, which in turn arises from a tragic flaw or from a tragic error in judgment. Often the tragic flaw is hubris, an excessive pride that causes the hero to ignore a divine warning or to break a moral law. It has been suggested that because the tragic hero's suffering is greater than his offense, the audience feels pity; because the audience members perceive that they could behave similarly, they feel pity.
    [Show full text]
  • Garrick's Alterations of Shakespeare
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88977-3 - Shakespeare and Garrick Vanessa Cunningham Excerpt More information prologue Garrick’s alterations of Shakespeare – a note on texts The great majority of the versions of Shakespeare’s plays made by David Garrick and published during his management of Drury Lane (1747– 1776) are described on their title pages as ‘alterations’, or as having been 1 ‘alter’d for performance’. The two operas (The Fairies, 1755, and The Tempest, 1756) are said to be ‘taken from Shakespear’, while Antony and Cleopatra,publishedin1758 and generally credited jointly to Edward Capell and Garrick (though not attributed to either on the title page), is dis- tinguished from the others by its description as ‘an historical Play, written by William Shakespeare: fitted for the Stage by abridging only’. Despite the fact that Harry William Pedicord and Fredrick Louis Bergmann, modern editors of Garrick’s plays, entitle their two volumes of Shakespeare- 2 derived texts ‘adaptations’, ‘alteration’ is certainly the preferable term for discussion of Garrick’s performance versions of Shakespeare’s plays, since throughout the eighteenth century ‘alter’ was used far more commonly than ‘adapt’. Garrick, according to Pedicord and Bergmann, is believed to have been involved in the altering of some twenty-two plays by Shakespeare over the course of his professional career. In their collected edition they reproduce 3 the dozen that they consider can be authenticated. The present work discusses a selection of alterations that span Garrick’s professional career. Two are from the early years (Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet) and two from the middle period (Florizel and Perdita, Antony and Cleopatra).
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth I and Irish Rule: Causations For
    ELIZABETH I AND IRISH RULE: CAUSATIONS FOR CONTINUED SETTLEMENT ON ENGLAND’S FIRST COLONY: 1558 - 1603 By KATIE ELIZABETH SKELTON Bachelor of Arts in History Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 2012 ELIZABETH I AND IRISH RULE: CAUSATIONS FOR CONTINUED SETTLEMENT ON ENGLAND’S FIRST COLONY: 1558 - 1603 Thesis Approved: Dr. Jason Lavery Thesis Adviser Dr. Kristen Burkholder Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. Sheryl A. Tucker Dean of the Graduate College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 II. ENGLISH RULE OF IRELAND ...................................................... 17 III. ENGLAND’S ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP WITH IRELAND ...................... 35 IV. ENGLISH ETHNIC BIAS AGAINST THE IRISH ................................... 45 V. ENGLISH FOREIGN POLICY & IRELAND ......................................... 63 VI. CONCLUSION ...................................................................... 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................ 94 iii LIST OF MAPS Map Page The Island of Ireland, 1450 ......................................................... 22 Plantations in Ireland, 1550 – 1610................................................ 72 Europe, 1648 ......................................................................... 75 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page
    [Show full text]
  • “From Strange to Stranger”: the Problem of Romance on the Shakespearean Stage
    “From strange to stranger”: The Problem of Romance on the Shakespearean Stage by Aileen Young Liu A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English and the Designated Emphasis in Renaissance and Early Modern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jeffrey Knapp, Chair Professor Oliver Arnold Professor David Landreth Professor Timothy Hampton Summer 2018 “From strange to stranger”: The Problem of Romance on the Shakespearean Stage © 2018 by Aileen Young Liu 1 Abstract “From strange to stranger”: The Problem of Romance on the Shakespearean Stage by Aileen Young Liu Doctor of Philosophy in English Designated Emphasis in Renaissance and Early Modern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Jeffrey Knapp, Chair Long scorned for their strange inconsistencies and implausibilities, Shakespeare’s romance plays have enjoyed a robust critical reconsideration in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. But in the course of reclaiming Pericles, The Winter’s Tale, Cymbeline, and The Tempest as significant works of art, this revisionary critical tradition has effaced the very qualities that make these plays so important to our understanding of Shakespeare’s career and to the development of English Renaissance drama: their belatedness and their overt strangeness. While Shakespeare’s earlier plays take pains to integrate and subsume their narrative romance sources into dramatic form, his late romance plays take exactly the opposite approach: they foreground, even exacerbate, the tension between romance and drama. Verisimilitude is a challenge endemic to theater as an embodied medium, but Shakespeare’s romance plays brazenly alert their audiences to the incredible.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu
    Members of Parliament Disqualified since 1900 This document provides information about Members of Parliament who have been disqualified since 1900. It is impossible to provide an entirely exhaustive list, as in many cases, the disqualification of a Member is not directly recorded in the Journal. For example, in the case of Members being appointed 5 to an office of profit under the Crown, it has only recently become practice to record the appointment of a Member to such an office in the Journal. Prior to this, disqualification can only be inferred from the writ moved for the resulting by-election. It is possible that in some circumstances, an election could have occurred before the writ was moved, in which case there would be no record from which to infer the disqualification, however this is likely to have been a rare occurrence. This list is based on 10 the writs issued following disqualification and the reason given, such as appointments to an office of profit under the Crown; appointments to judicial office; election court rulings and expulsion. Appointment of a Member to an office of profit under the Crown in the Chiltern Hundreds or the Manor of Northstead is a device used to allow Members to resign their seats, as it is not possible to simply resign as a Member of Parliament, once elected. This is by far the most common means of 15 disqualification. There are a number of Members disqualified in the early part of the twentieth century for taking up Ministerial Office. Until the passage of the Re-Election of Ministers Act 1919, Members appointed to Ministerial Offices were disqualified and had to seek re-election.
    [Show full text]