DOCSLIB.ORG

Divergence in International Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Divergence in International Relations New Zealand & Australia: Divergence in International Relations With Reference to the Howard & Clark Governments 1996/1999 – 2007 Regeena Kingsley INTP 591: Master of Arts Research Thesis in International Relations New Zealand & Australia: Divergence in International Relations With Reference to the Howard & Clark Governments 1996/1999 – 2007 By Regeena Kingsley A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations 5 October 2007 Abstract This thesis is an in-depth study into the New Zealand-Australian relationship and the two nations’ divergence in International Relations, with particular reference to the disparate foreign and security policies implemented under the Howard and Clark Governments from 1996/1999 respectively until the present time in 2007. The purpose of this study is to provide an accurate and up-to-date overview of the New Zealand-Australian relationship as it stands today, and to define the main areas of difference between the two countries which are driving trans-Tasman divergence in the international sphere. In pursuit of this goal, the subject-area is explored in the following ways. Chapter One provides a general overview of the trans-Tasman relationship, reflecting specifically on three abiding dynamics which together have contributed to the ‘strangeness’ of the trans-Tasman rapport from the mid-1800s until today. Chapter Two, defines in fuller detail the greatest areas of divergence between the two countries in their foreign and security policies, and then additionally outlines three important issues in the international sphere on which the Tasman pair have diverged most strikingly in recent years. Chapters Three to Five introduce and explore three areas of fundamental difference between the Tasman pair in their International Relations, considered here to be driving factors behind the trans-Tasman divide – namely, different beliefs and approaches towards multilateralism, the use of force and relations with the United States. Finally, Chapters Six and Seven explore three contemporary theories attempting to explain New Zealand and Australia’s divergence in International Relations today. There are three main arguments throughout this thesis: first, that New Zealand and Australia are becoming increasingly divergent in their foreign affairs; second, that is divergence is primarily due to the fact that the two countries are fundamentally different in their views and approaches towards three crucial areas within international politics – multilateralism, the use of force and relations with the United States; and thirdly, that these differences in view and approach, and the divergent policies they produce, in turn arise chiefly from completely disparate senses of national identity in the two Tasman countries, which motivate differing – and sometimes conflicting – foreign policy behaviour. These three arguments are explored and expounded in the following ways. With regard to the first argument, Chapter Two provides an in-depth overview of the most important areas of divergence between New Zealand and Australia since 1999. As to the second argument, Chapters Three to Five employ a case study based on discourse analysis into New Zealand and Australian governmental speeches on the 2002-2003 Iraq Crisis – an issue that inherently involved these three fundamental areas of difference – in order to specify precisely how New Zealand and Australia diverge in their view and approach to these three matters based on the two Governments’ own self-proffered statements and explanations. These disparate beliefs are then shown to translate into divergent actions and foreign policy behaviour on the i world stage, by substantiating such rhetorical statements with evidence taken from the Howard and Clark Governments’ foreign policy record, as documented in governmental documents as well as in political and academic literature. Finally, with regard to the third argument, Chapters Six and Seven involve a discussion and critique of two rather convincing orthodox explanations for trans-Tasman divergence – Hugh White’s ‘Strategic Perception’ and David McCraw’s ‘Divergent Political Ideologies’, as well as a summary and broad application of one new theoretical explanation, called ‘Identity Theory’, to New Zealand and Australia’s foreign policy record, in order to show that it is indeed identity- based explanations, when combined with other strategic and political factors, that in fact provide the most accurate, comprehensive and insightful explanation for New Zealand and Australia’s divergent behaviour in the international sphere from the time of Federation in 1901 until today in 2007. This thesis makes the following conclusions: first, that it is fundamentally different beliefs in regard to multilateralism, the use of force and relations with the United States which are driving the ‘continental drift’ between New Zealand and Australia, through motivating disparate policies and conflicting behaviour by the Tasman pair in their international affairs, as shown during the 2003 Iraq Crisis; secondly, that these dissimilar beliefs regarding the three matters stem in turn from deeply-rooted foreign policy traditions within New Zealand and Australia’s own core national identity, namely traditions of independence, idealism and multilateralism in New Zealand, and independence, realism and alliances in Australia; and thirdly, that it is in fact national identity – encompassing national beliefs, traditions and ideas of what the nation stands for and is destined to become – that can best explain nation- state behaviour and actions on the world stage today. It is hoped that the research undertaken in this thesis will not only contribute to the new wave of academic literature attempting to describe and explain the differences between New Zealand and Australia in our foreign affairs today in 2007, but also add to the growing consensus in the constructivist academic world that identity-based explanations are crucial for understanding foreign affairs. In my own view, I believe that it is indeed identity theory, when combined with elements of disparate strategic perception and predominant governmental political ideology advocated by White and McCraw, which together present the best and most wide-ranging means of understanding the complex realities of International Relations today. ii Table of Contents Introduction p. 1 Chapter One: Odd Couple: The Strange Trans-Tasman Relationship p. 6 Chapter Two: Trans-Tasman Divergence in International Relations p. 22 Three Fundamental Differences & Iraq (Case Study) p. 48 Chapter Three: Case Study: Multilateralism p. 55 Chapter Four: Case Study: The Use of Force p. 75 Chapter Five: Case Study: Relations with the United States p. 99 Chapter Six: Theoretical Applications: Explaining the Divergence p. 137 Chapter Seven: Introducing Identity Theory p. 155 Conclusion p. 180 Reference List p. 195 iii Introduction Nearly forty years ago, when New Zealand stood at the crossroads following Britain’s membership in the EEC, the then New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs gave a series of speeches that emphasized the point that “the time has come for New Zealand to recognise that our relationship with Australia is more important to us than our links with any other country in the world…It has to be the cornerstone of New Zealand’s external policies” (Talboys, cited in McMillan, 1980, p. 166). This same notion is still being voiced today, as a speech given by Winston Peters, the current Minister of Foreign Affairs recently illustrated. “New Zealand’s relationship with Australia is unique, and it is the cornerstone of our foreign policy”, he said. “In many ways the strength of our foreign policy depends on this bond” (Peters, 2006a). Nevertheless, despite this kind of rhetoric, the fact remains that New Zealand and Australia have been drifting apart politically for quite some time. Back in 2001, for instance, Gerald Hensley, a high profile former diplomat and Secretary of Defence, concluded the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs (NZIIA) conference by remarking on a prevailing atmosphere of pessimism among the academics and politicians participating in the proceedings on the topic of ‘New Zealand and Australia: Where are we going?’. “Politically the two nations are in fact on different courses and are drifting apart,” he stated (Hensley, 2001, p. 95). According to Max Bradford, moreover, a former NZ Minister of Defence and Member of Parliament, the Australia-New Zealand relationship is not only drifting apart, but doing so rapidly. As he states: “certainly there are more factors pushing us apart than are pulling us together at any time since I have been in politics, or in business before I entered Parliament” (Bradford, 2001, p. 27). Academic Bob Catley likewise argues the two nations are diverging, and attributes the blame to the rise to power of the Clark Labour governments since 1999, under whose leadership, he states, the process of steadily-increasing integration between the two countries in defence, migration and economic liberalisation has been most drastically reversed (Catley, 2001, p. 18). The disparity between these two Antipodean nations is particularly prevalent in the realm of security. Bradford describes defence as New Zealand’s “most important single 1 difference with Australia”, and one that has become not only the biggest source of friction and dispute between the two countries and a real source of grievance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Museums and Australia's Greek Textile Heritage
    Museums and Australia’s Greek textile heritage: the desirability and ability of State museums to be inclusive of diverse cultures through the reconciliation of public cultural policies with private and community concerns. Ann Coward Bachelor of General Studies (BGenStud) Master of Letters, Visual Arts & Design (MLitt) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Art History and Theory College of Fine Arts University of New South Wales December, 2006 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project’s design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed .................................................................. ABSTRACT This thesis explores the desirability of Australia’s State museums to be inclusive of diverse cultures. In keeping with a cultural studies approach, and a commitment to social action, emphasis is placed upon enhancing the ability of State museums to fulfil obligations and expectations imposed upon them as modern collecting institutions in a culturally diverse nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark Vader and the Helengrad Labour Lesbians
    Clark Vader and the Helengrad Labour Lesbians Anatomy of a political-symbolic hate campaign Lewis Stoddart – [email protected] 2008-07-20 (This is a slightly revised edition of a research paper submitted toward a graduate diploma in political science at Victoria University of Wellington on 15 October 2007) And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp. — George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four Clark Vader and the Helengrad Labour Lesbians Lewis Stoddart – [email protected] – 2008-07-20 Contents Introduction 2 Methodology 3 Discourse . 3 Political symbols . 7 Communist lesbian dictator 9 Communist . 9 Feminazi . 10 Totalitarian . 10 Ideological conspiracy . 11 Information control . 12 Corruption . 14 Nanny State . 15 Violence . 17 Convergence . 18 Symbolic promotion 19 Hate................................................... 20 A theory of symbolic promotion . 21 Hope................................................... 22 Appendix A: Data collection 25 Appendix B: Symbolic vocabulary 26 Appendix C: Source audio 29 Bibliography 33 1 Clark Vader and the Helengrad Labour Lesbians Lewis Stoddart – [email protected] – 2008-07-20 Helen Clark, the first woman elected Prime Minister of New Zealand, has for decades been the subject of political attacks. These have been made on the basis of her history as an academic, her gender, domestic status and personal life, and not least her politics. John Banks and Lindsay Perigo, in their host roles on the Radio Pacific breakfast talk show The First Edition,1 crystallised various of these attack strategies into a characterisation which I describe as ‘communist lesbian dictator’. This is not to say that Banks or Perigo ever owned or controlled the discourse which feeds this charac- terisation; indeed it is quite widespread, enough so that caricatures of Clark2 routinely make fun of her ‘masculine’ characteristics, her ‘ruthlessness’, her tendency to wear red blazers, and other such symbolic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • 'About Turn': an Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's
    Newcastle University e-prints Date deposited: 2nd May 2013 Version of file: Author final Peer Review Status: Peer reviewed Citation for item: Reardon J, Gray TS. About Turn: An Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's Adoption of Neo-Liberal Policies 1984-1990. Political Quarterly 2007, 78(3), 447-455. Further information on publisher website: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Publisher’s copyright statement: The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00872.x Always use the definitive version when citing. Use Policy: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not for profit purposes provided that: A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source A link is made to the metadata record in Newcastle E-prints The full text is not changed in any way. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Robinson Library, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 7RU. Tel. 0191 222 6000 ‘About turn’: an analysis of the causes of the New Zealand Labour Party’s adoption of neo- liberal economic policies 1984-1990 John Reardon and Tim Gray School of Geography, Politics and Sociology Newcastle University Abstract This is the inside story of one of the most extraordinary about-turns in policy-making undertaken by a democratically elected political party.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Stereotypes and Media Bias in Women's
    Gender Stereotypes and Media Bias in Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office: The 2009 Campaign of Dora Bakoyannis for the Leadership of Nea Dimokratia in Greece by Stefanos Oikonomou B.A. in Communications and Media Studies, February 2010, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of College of Professional Studies of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Professional Studies August 31, 2014 Thesis directed by Michael Cornfield Associate Professor of Political Management Acknowledgments I would like to thank my parents, Stella Triantafullopoulou and Kostas Oikonomou, to whom this work is dedicated, for their continuous love, support, and encouragement and for helping me realize my dreams. I would also like to thank Chrysanthi Hatzimasoura and Philip Soucacos, for their unyielding friendship, without whom this work would have never been completed. Finally, I wish to express my gratitude to Professor Michael Cornfield for his insights and for helping me cross the finish line; Professor David Ettinger for his guidance during the first stage of this research and for helping me adjust its scope; and the Director of Academic Administration at The Graduate School of Political Management, Suzanne Farrand, for her tremendous generosity and understanding throughout this process. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………….vi List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………….vii
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts
    New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts By Simon Beuse A Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations Victoria University of Wellington 2010 Content List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 New Zealand‘s Foreign Affairs .......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Public Perceptions ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 History ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Key Relationships ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4 The Nuclear Issue ...................................................................................................... 12 2.5 South Pacific .............................................................................................................. 14 2.6 Help in Numbers: The United Nations ...................................................................... 15 2.7 Defence Reform 2000
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Precincts: History and Significance
    MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 0 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Perky'Ile Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12. Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 68 Background History 68 Statement of Significance for Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 69 13. Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 72 Background History 72 Statement of Significance for Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 73 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests Summary 2017
    J. 7 Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament: Summary of annual returns as at 31 January 2017 Fifty-first Parliament Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 2 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 MISTER SPEAKER I have the honour to provide to you, pursuant to clause 18(3) of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives, a copy of the summary booklet containing a fair and accurate description of the information contained in the Register of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament, as at 31 January 2017. Sir Maarten Wevers KNZM Registrar of Pecuniary and Other Specified Interests of Members of Parliament 3 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY AND OTHER SPECIFIED INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 Introduction Since 2005, members of Parliament have been required to make an annual return of their pecuniary and other specified personal interests, as set out in clauses 5 to 8 of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. The interests that are required to be registered are listed below. Items 1 to 9 provide a “snapshot” or stock of pecuniary and specified interests of members as at 31 January 2017. Items 10 to 13 identify a flow of members’ interests for the period from the member’s previous return.
    [Show full text]
  • National Convention Oceania Region Thursday 7Th January 2016
    Melbourne 7-12 January 2016 Pancretan Association of Melbourne - Australia Cretan Brotherhood of Melbourne & Victoria Cretan Federation of Australia & New Zealand National Convention Oceania Region Thursday 7th January 2016 • Arrival of delegates. • Registration at the Hotel - Radisson On Flagstaff Gardens, 380 William Street Melbourne (03) 9322 8000. Friday 8th January 2016 9.00am • Victorian Yarra Valley Tour. (Optional) A visit to Victoria’s best Wineries. 11.00am • Cretan Youth of Australia & New Zealand, National Annual Gen- eral Meeting. Cretan House, 148-150 Nicholson Street, East Brunswick. 7.30pm • Official Opening of the 37th CFANZ National Convention with a 7.00pm • Cretan Youth of Australia Cocktail Party at the Cretan House, & New Zealand Hellenic Function @ 148-150 Nicholson Street, East Brun- Mezanine of the Greek Cultural Centre, swick with musicians from Crete Gior- 168 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne. For gos & Nikos Stratakis & Dimitris Zogra- enquiries contact Emmanuel Hereta- fakis. kis on 0433 058 097 or Paula Sagiadel- lis on 0413 715 069. Saturday 9th January 2016 7.00pm • Dinner for Interstate and In- 9.00am • Melbourne City Tour. (Option ternational Delegates at Kritamos Hel- A) A visit to Melbourne’s Aquarium, lenic Cuisine, 280 Bridge Road Rich- Eureka Tower, National Gallery, Star mond. Observation Wheel. 7.30pm • Cretan Dinner Dance at the Cretan Village, 90 Cathies Lane, Wantirna South with musicians from Crete Giorgos & Nikos Stratakis & Dimitris Zografakis including dance performances from the groups from 9.00am • Greek Australian Tour. (Op- Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. tion B) A visit to the Shrine of Reme- brance, Australian Hellenic Memo- Sunday 10th January 2016 rial, Lemnos Gallipoli Memorial, Greek Cultural Centre, Lonsdale Street Greek 10.00am • Church Service for all Del- Precinct, Hellenic Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Paddling on One Side of the Canoe Nzadds Working Paper May 2011
    Paddling on one side of the canoe?: The changing nature of New Zealand’s development assistance programme NZADDs Working Paper1 Glenn Banks: [email protected] (corresponding author); Warwick E Murray: [email protected]; John Overton: [email protected]; Regina Scheyvens: [email protected] The direction and nature of New Zealand’s aid policy has undergone a near revolution under the National Party government elected in 2008. Prior to this, NZAID, a semi-autonomous unit of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, had evolved to manage the aid budget in line with internationally-agreed principles on aid practice, reflecting concepts of partnership and shared responsibility, concepts analogous to the notion of paddling on both sides of the canoe. Under the new National Government, NZAID was reincorporated into the Ministry, its focus was shifted from poverty and diversified livelihoods to economic growth, and the aid programme has been aligned more closely with the country’s foreign policy interests. We suggest that this is tantamount to paddling the canoe on only one side. This paper interprets these shifts in the context of the restructuring in New Zealand international aid policy between 1970 and 2010. The article has three broad aims: Firstly, to provide an overview of shifting themes and geographies of New Zealand’s aid policy over the four decades of concern; secondly, to explore the relationship between the global aid regime and national practice commenting on the factors that lead to alignment in these two imperatives or otherwise; and thirdly, to analyse the influence of politics, and of key individuals within political parties, in setting the direction of aid policy.
    [Show full text]
  • I Green Politics and the Reformation of Liberal Democratic
    Green Politics and the Reformation of Liberal Democratic Institutions. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the University of Canterbury by R.M.Farquhar University of Canterbury 2006 I Contents. Abstract...........................................................................................................VI Introduction....................................................................................................VII Methodology....................................................................................................XIX Part 1. Chapter 1 Critical Theory: Conflict and change, marxism, Horkheimer, Adorno, critique of positivism, instrumental reason, technocracy and the Enlightenment...................................1 1.1 Mannheim’s rehabilitation of ideology and politics. Gramsci and social and political change, hegemony and counter-hegemony. Laclau and Mouffe and radical plural democracy. Talshir and modular ideology............................................................................11 Part 2. Chapter 2 Liberal Democracy: Dryzek’s tripartite conditions for democracy. The struggle for franchise in Britain and New Zealand. Extra-Parliamentary and Parliamentary dynamics. .....................29 2.1 Technocracy, New Zealand and technocracy, globalisation, legitimation crisis. .............................................................................................................................46 Chapter 3 Liberal Democracy-historical
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual
    IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Melodrama and Gendered Mediation: Television Coverage of Women's Leadership “Coups” in New Zealand and Australia Linda Trimble Published Online: 15 Aug 2013
    This article was downloaded by: [Linda Trimble] On: 15 August 2013, At: 08:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Feminist Media Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rfms20 Melodrama and Gendered Mediation: Television Coverage of Women's Leadership “Coups” in New Zealand and Australia Linda Trimble Published online: 15 Aug 2013. To cite this article: Feminist Media Studies (2013): Melodrama and Gendered Mediation: Television Coverage of Women's Leadership “Coups” in New Zealand and Australia, Feminist Media Studies To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.826268 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]