“Tous Mes Livres De Langues Estrangeres” Reconstructing the Legatum Scaligeri in Leyden University Library*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary -
Jury, and the Administration of Homicide Investigation by the Centralized Courts
Book Reviews 1091 jury, and the administration of homicide investigation by the centralized courts. Sara M. Butler The Ohio State University Xavier Prévost, Jacques Cujas (1522-1590): Jurisconsulte humaniste (Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 541), Genève: Droz, 2015. Pp. xvi, 590. $122.76 paper (ISBN 978-2-600-01814-2). doi:10.1017/S0738248018000548 As Xavier Prévost rightly observes at the beginning of his book, there is a strange paradox between the great fame that Jacques Cujas has enjoyed through- out the centuries and the relative scarcity of studies on the man and his work. Driven by youthful energy and the urgent desire to fill that gap, Prévost read the 13,000 columns of the Fabrot edition of Cujas’s Opera omnia (1658) in addition to investigating archives in Toulouse, Bourges, and Paris with the aim of offering a comprehensive view of Cujas’s life, academic career, and scholarly work. Even after this meticulous research, many elements in Cujas’s biography remain uncertain—for example, we do not know exactly when he graduated as a law student—but the author has done about everything possible to advance our knowledge about Cujas. Prévost has also corrected false assump- tions along the way; for example, rejecting Friedrich Carl von Savigny’s dating of Cujas’s marriage to Madeleine Du Roure (72, footnote 270). Clearly, Prévost’s Jacques Cujas (1522-1590): Jurisconsulte humaniste is characterized by the same thirst for truth and scientific rigor that formed the basis of Cujas’s critical engagement with the Roman legal tradition. This explains why the book has already won several prizes, including the Prix Corbay of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences at the Institut de France. -
Sixteenth Century Society and Conference S Thursday, 17 October to Sunday, 20 October 2019
Sixteenth Century Society and Conference S Thursday, 17 October to Sunday, 20 October 2019 Cover Picture: Hans Burgkmair, Portrait of the Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I (1459–1519) (1518). Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. Sixteenth Century Society & Conference 17–20 October 2019 2019 OFFICERS President: Walter S. Melion Vice-President: Andrew Spicer Past-President: Kathleen M. Comerford Executive Director: Bruce Janacek Financialo Officer: Eric Nelson COUNCIL Class of 2019: Brian Sandberg, Daniel T. Lochman, Suzanne Magnanini, Thomas L. Herron Class of 2020: David C. Mayes, Charles H. Parker, Carin Franzén, Scott C. Lucas Class of 2021: Sara Beam, Jasono Powell, Ayesha Ramachandran, Michael Sherberg ACLS REPRESENTATIVE oKathryn Edwards PROGRAM COMMITTEE Chair: Andrew Spicer Art History: James Clifton Digital Humanities: Suzanne Sutherland English Literature: Scott C. Lucas French Literature: Scott M. Francis German Studies: Jennifer Welsh History: Janis M. Gibbs Interdisciplinary: Andrew Spicer Italian Studies: Jennifer Haraguchi Pedagogy: Chris Barrett Science and Medicine: Chad D. Gunnoe Spanish and Latin American Studies: Nieves Romero-Diaz Theology:o Rady Roldán-Figueroa NOMINATING COMMITTEE Amy E. Leonard, Beth Quitslund, Jeffreyo R. Watt, Thomas Robisheaux, Elizabeth A. Lehfeldt ENDOWMENT CHAIRS Susano Dinan and James Clifton SIXTEENTH CENTURY SOCIETY & CONFERENCE FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY COMMITTEE Sheila ffolliott (Chair) Kathryn Brammall, Kathleen M. Comerford, Gary Gibbs, Whitney A. M. Leeson, Ray Waddington, Merry Wiesner-Hanks Waltero S. Melion (ex officio) 2019 SCSC PRIZE COMMITTEES Founders’ Prize Karen Spierling, Stephanie Dickey, Wim François Gerald Strauss Book Prize David Luebke, Jesse Spohnholz, Jennifer Welsh Bainton Art & Music History Book Prize Bret Rothstein, Lia Markey, Jessica Weiss Bainton History/Theology Book Prize Barbara Pitkin, Tryntje Helfferich, Haruko Ward Bainton Literature Book Prize Deanne Williams, Thomas L. -
The Humanist Discourse in the Northern Netherlands
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Clashes of discourses: Humanists and Calvinists in seventeenth-century academic Leiden Kromhout, D. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kromhout, D. (2016). Clashes of discourses: Humanists and Calvinists in seventeenth- century academic Leiden. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 Chapter 1: The humanist discourse in the Northern Netherlands This chapter will characterize the discourse of the Leiden humanists in the first decade of the seventeenth century. This discourse was in many aspects identical to the discourse of the Republic of Letters. The first section will show how this humanist discourse found its place at Leiden University through the hands of Janus Dousa and others. -
Scott Shapiro November 7, 2014 Attached Are the First Two Chapters
Scott Shapiro November 7, 2014 Attached are the first two chapters from a book manuscript that I am writing with my colleague Oona Hathaway, tentatively titled “THE WORST CRIME OF ALL: THE PARIS PEACE PACT AND THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF WAR.” This cover note is meant to help situate the chapters in the broader project. The first part describes what we call the Old World Order—a system that relied on war as the linchpin of law. The first two chapters center on Grotius and the legal order he helped establish. The subsequent chapters of this part show how war was a source of legal redress and legal rights. The legal rights to territory, people, and goods were decided by war—even ones that were entirely unjust. The second part of the book—comprised of four chapters—tells the story of what we argue is a deep shift in the legal meaning of war—the end of the Old World Order and the beginning of something fundamentally new. This shift, we argue, has consequences not just for states’ recourse to war, but for international law and the international system as a whole. The chapter that begins this second part of the book examines the “war to outlaw war”—the global movement to reject the remedial conception of war that characterized the Old World Order. That chapter ends with the signing of the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact (also called the Paris Peace Pact or Briand-Kellogg Pact). The next chapter examines the consequences that flowed from the decision to reject the legal rules that underpinned the Old World Order without first sorting out the legal rules and institutions that would take their place. -
Poems on the Threshold: Neo-Latin Carmina Liminaria
Chapter 3 Poems on the Threshold: Neo-Latin carmina liminaria Harm-Jan van Dam Introduction Imagine someone about four hundred years ago picking up a new Latin book, for instance the fourth edition of Daniel Heinsius’ poetry, published in Leiden, shown at the end of this paper. It dates from 1613, as the colophon at the end of the book states. Readers enter the book through the frontispiece or main entrance, with its promises of sublime poetry given by the crown- ing of Pegasus, and of a text so much more correct and complete according to the inscription (emendata locis infinitis & aucta) that it would be better to throw away their earlier editions. The entrance draws the reader inside to the next page where he may learn the book’s contents (indicem . aversa indicat pagina). That index is followed first by a prose Dedicatio addressed to one of the Governors of Leiden University, then by a poem in six elegiac distichs on Heinsius’ Elegies by Joseph Scaliger, a letter by Hugo Grotius ending with seven distichs, and a Greek poem of sixteen distichs by Heinsius’ colleague Petrus Cunaeus. Finally Heinsius devotes six pages to an Address Amico lectori. Then, stepping across the threshold, the reader at last enters the house itself, the first book of the Elegies.1 Many, if not most, early modern books begin like this, with various prelimi- nary matter in prose and especially in poetry. Nevertheless, not much has been written on poems preceding the main text of books.2 They are often designated 1 Respectively pp. -
La Mémoire Du Droit Catalogue 45 LE TRÉSOR DU DROIT
La Mémoire du Droit Catalogue 45 LE TRÉSOR DU DROIT 1. CUJACII (Jacobi) [CUJAS (Jacques)], JACOBI CIJACII IC PRÆSTANTISSIMI OPERA OMNIA IN DECEM TOMOS DISTRIBUTA Vol. I : OPERA OMNIA, IN DECEM TOMOS DISTRIBVTA. QVIBVS CONTINENTVR TAM PRIORA… Vol. II : OPERUM PRIORUM… Vol. III : OPERUM PRIORUM… Vol. IV : OPERUM POSTUMORUM… Vol. V : OPERUM POSTUMORUM… Vol. VI : OPERUM POSTUMORUM… Vol. VII : OPERUM POSTUMORUM…. Vol. VIII : OPERUM POSTUMORUM… Vol. IX : OPERUM POSTUMORUM… Vol. X : SIVE APPENDIX… Vol. XI : OPERUM OMNIUM IN DECEM TOMOS DISTRIBUTORUM… Vol. XII : PROMPTUARIUM UNIVERSORUM OPERUM… Vol. XIII : PROMPTUARIUM UNIVERSORUM OPERUM… Le détail complet de tous les titres par volume est disponible sur le site ou sur demande : accéder au lien Neapoli (Naples), Typographia Moriana / Typographi Simoniana 1758-1763, 13 vol. in-folio, plein veau fauve moucheté d’époque, titre & tomaison dorés sur pièces bordeaux et brunes, dos à 6 nerfs ornés de fleurons et frises, impression des pages de tit. en deux couleurs, Portrait gravé de l’auteur en frontispice, ex-libris manuscrit ancien sur chaque tome, livre de prix de la « Faculté de droit de Paris - Concours de 1870 - Droit romain - 1er Prix » et reliure au prix des tomes 1 et 11, (restauration légère et visible sur qq. coupes et coins, d’autres restent très légèrement frottés avec de mq. mineurs, marque d’humidité au dos du dernier tome et qq. traces sur les 5 derniers ff., qq. accrocs aux coiffes de queue), reliure en excellent état et papier presque immaculé. Nous présentons ici la dernière et la plus importante édition des œuvres de Cujas. En effet, l’édition napolitaine reprend celle de paris de 1658 ; elle contient en outre, et parmi les textes les plus impor - tants de l’auteur, les Paratitla codicis, les Recitationes solemnes sur les Decretales de Gratien et les Recitationes exactissimæ. -
Good Gratifying and Renowned
WILLEM OTTERSPEER This is the story of four centuries during which Leiden University shared the fate of the Netherlands, and became representative of the most important advances in academic research. At the same time it Good is a declaration of adoration to one of Europe’s most leading international universities. On 28 December 1574, William of Orange wrote a letter to the States General of the provinces of Holland and Zeeland from the town of Middelburg. He came to Gratifying the representatives with a proposal, a dream actually, Renowed GratifyingGood and with the plan for founding ‘a good, gratifying and A CONCISE HISTORY renowned school or university’. This letter would become the first document in the archives of Leiden OF LEIDEN UNIVERSITY University, offering an apt title for this concise history. and Willem Otterspeer (1950) is Professor of University History at Leiden University. Along with the present work, he is the author of a comprehensive, four- Renowned volume history of Leiden University. In addition to his roles as historian and biographer, he is also an essayist and a critic. ISBN 978-90-872-8235-6 WILLEM OTTERSPEER LEIDEN UNIVERSITY PRESS 9 789087 282356 www.lup.nl LUP LEIDEN PUBLICATIONS LUP_OTTERSPEER_(hstryLeidnUnvrst)_rug18.7mm_v01.indd 1 26-11-15 10:38 Good Gratifying A CONCISE HISTORY OF LEIDEN UNIVERSITY and Renowned Good Gratifying A CONCISE HISTORY OF LEIDEN UNIVERSITY and Renowned WILLEM OTTERSPEER LEIDEN PUBLICATIONS Font: Gerard Unger was special professor of graphic design at Leiden University from 2006 to 2012. In 2013, he received his doctorate for his design of the Alverata font, a 21st-century European font design with roots in the Middle Ages. -
Warwick.Ac.Uk/Lib-Publications Manuscript Version: Author's
Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/114589 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected]. warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications 1 Definitive version for Erudition and the Republic of Letters Feb 2019 How the Sauce Got to be Better -
Circles of Confidence in Correspondence: Modeling
Circles of Confidence in Correspondence: Modeling Confidentiality and Secrecy in Knowledge Exchange Networks of Letters and Drawings in the Early Modern Period Charles van den Heuvel 1), Scott Weingart 2), Nils Spelt 3) and Henk Nellen 1) 1) Huygens ING – The Hague (Netherlands) [email protected] ; [email protected] 2) Carnergie Mellon University Pittsburgh (USA) [email protected] 3) Erasmus University Rotterdam (Netherlands) [email protected] Abstract Science in the early modern world depended on openness in scholarly communication. On the other hand, a web of commercial, political, and religious conflicts required broad measures of secrecy and confidentiality; similar measures were integral to scholarly rivalries and plagiarism. This paper analyzes confidentiality and secrecy in intellectual and technological knowledge exchange via letters and drawings. We argue that existing approaches to understanding knowledge exchange in early modern Europe – which focus on the Republic of Letters as a unified entity of corresponding scholars – can be improved upon by analyzing multilayered networks of communication. We describe a data model to analyze circles of confidence and cultures of secrecy in intellectual and technological knowledge exchanges. Finally, we discuss the outcomes of a first experiment focusing on the question of how personal and professional/official relationships interact with confidentiality and secrecy, based on a case study of the correspondence of Hugo Grotius. Keywords Republic of Letters, network analysis, circulation and visualization of knowledge Confidentiality and Secrecy in the Republics of Letters: Introduction “Networks of Trust” is the title of an article by Franz Mauelshagen, and one of many publications that discuss the concept of confidentiality in the Republic of Letters. -
GLOSSAE. European Journal of Legal History 14 (2017)
GLOSSAE. European Journal of Legal History 14 (2017) ISSN 2255-2707 Edited by Institute for Social, Political and Legal Studies (Valencia, Spain) Honorary Chief Editor Antonio Pérez Martín, University of Murcia Chief Editor Aniceto Masferrer, University of Valencia Assistant Chief Editors Wim Decock, University of Leuven Juan A. Obarrio Moreno, University of Valencia Editorial Board Isabel Ramos Vázquez, University of Jaén (Secretary) Francisco Calabuig Alberola, University of Valencia (Website Editor) Anna Taitslin, Australian National University – University of Canberra M.C. Mirow, Florida International University José Miguel Piquer, University of Valencia Andrew Simpson, University of Aberdeen International Advisory Board Javier Alvarado Planas, UNED; Juan Baró Pazos, University of Cantabria; Mary Sarah Bilder, Boston College; Orazio Condorelli, University of Catania; Emanuele Conte, University of Rome III; Daniel R. Coquillette, Boston College – Harvard University; Serge Dauchy, University of Lille; Salustiano de Dios, University of Salamanca; José Domingues, University of Lusíada; Seán Patrick Donlan, The University of the South Pacific; Matthew Dyson, University of Oxford; Antonio Fernández de Buján, University Autónoma de Madrid; Remedios Ferrero, University of Valencia; Manuel Gutan, Lucian Blaga Universi- ty of Sibiu; Alejandro Guzmán Brito, Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso; Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam; Dirk Heirbaut, Ghent University; Richard Helmholz, University of Chicago; Da- vid Ibbetson, University -
Joseph Scaliger, Isaac Casaubon and Richard Thomson Paul Botley University of Warwick
Three Very Different Translators: Joseph Scaliger, Isaac Casaubon and Richard Thomson Paul Botley University of Warwick This essay revisits some ideas on translation which I developed several years ago. They 477 were published as part of a book on Latin translation in the fifteenth and early six- teenth centuries, and one of the purposes of the present essay is to discover whether the intervening years have been kind to them. That book,Latin Translation in the Renaissance, examined the work of a number of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century translators, in particular, Leonardo Bruni, Giannozzo Manetti and Desiderius Erasmus, and suggested an alternative approach to categorising renaissance translations. It argued that in the fifteenth century ideas about translation became more sophisticated because of the proliferation of different translations of the same text. This was a new phenomenon: by and large, the Middle Ages had been obliged to make do with unique versions of a rather small number of Greek texts, and medieval scholars were seldom in a position to compare the merits of rival versions. In the fifteenth century, a number of versions of the same Greek text became available. As a consequence of this multiplication of renderings, even those who knew nothing of the original language were able to evaluate the differences between versions. Thus, in the fifteenth century, it became possible for a reader with no knowledge of Greek to deepen his understanding of a Greek author by collating a number of Latin translations of the original text. In such circumstances, the relation- ship of the translation to the other available translations was at least as important as the relationship of the translation to the original, Greek, text.1 Thinking about these relationships between these early modern translations led me to suggest that they could be placed into three broad categories, which I called replacements, competitors and supplements.