DOCSLIB.ORG

CPY Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Archives in Russia on the Famine in Ukraine Iryna Matiash he problem of the Holodomor in Ukraine is which provided relief to starving Ukrainians, or those among the most complicated both in Ukrainian which became a second homeland to post-World War and in foreign historiography. Active research II Ukrainian emigrants. Perhaps the largest number of Tinto the Great Famine in large measure spans only thedocuments in terms of volume is to be found in the federal post-Soviet period, since, as we know, the question “did and local archives of the Russian Federation, which hold not exist” in Soviet historiography. In studying such an documents of all-Union state and Party organs, as well important (and for the Ukrainian people painful) problem, as their leading figures, that is, those who bore personal historical sources possess a special significance and their responsibility for the Ukrainian tragedy. unprejudiced analysis and interpretation is the duty of A large number of the documents accessible every historian. The initiation of the process leading to to researchers are already in scholarly circulation; the declassification of archival information, which took Ukrainian and foreign scholars are actively using the place at different times in the various successor states of information they provide in their specialized works. A the Soviet empire, made it possible for a documentary large aggregate of documents has been made available substratum to be created for an objective study of the in some fundamental publications.2 Concise data on tragic pages of our history. Now there is no reason the informational resources of the Russian Federation's to complain that the necessary source materials are archives regarding Holodomor issues have been supplied unavailable. by V. Marochko3 and H. Kapustian,4 while D. Khubova5 True, here one might mention the loss of some has consulted the Holodomor's oral history. archival fonds or aggregates of documents, and the All the same, it remains imperative that a detailed limiting of access to individual archives, fonds, or examination be conducted of the information bearing documents. on the Holodomor in Ukraine that has accumulated in Generally, however, the documentary pub- lications and collections of oral history, which 2. Dokumenty svidetel'stvuiut. Iz istorii derevni nakanune i v khode kollektivizatsii 1927-1932 gg., ed V. P. Danilov and N. A. have been appearing for more than 15 years now Ivanitskii (Moscow: Izd. Polit. literatury, 1989), 526 pp.; Stalins- in Ukraine and the Russian Federation, provide a koe Politbiuro v 1930 gg. Sbornik dokumentov, compiled by O. V. graphic representation of the political, economic, Khlevniuk et al. (Moscow, 1995), 340 pp.; Tragediia sovetskoi derev- national, and social components of the Holodomor- ni. Kollektivizatsiia i raskulachivanie. 1927-1939. Dokumenty i mate- rialy. V 5-ti tt. Tom 1: Mai 1927—noiabr' 1929, edited by V. Danilov Genocide in Ukraine. Nevertheless, difficulties arise with et al. (Moscow, 1999), 880 pp. Tom 3: Konets 1930-1933 (Moscow, the interpretation of historical sources, particularly in the 2001); Stalin i Kaganovich. Perepiska. 1931-1936, compiled by O. context of the Ukrainian-Russian scholarly discussion of V Khlevniuk et al. (Moscow, 2001), 798 pp; V Vasyl'ev and Iu. this issue with its obvious political subtext. The archival Shapoval, eds., Komandyry velykoho holodu: Poizdka V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrainu ta na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz. 1932—1933 information now available, as well as that which has yet (Kyiv: Heneza, 2001); Lubianka. Stalin i VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD. to come to light, demands competent evaluation. The Arkhiv Stalina. Dokumenty vysshikh organov partiinoi i gosudarst- researcher who aspires to reveal the truth should turn to vennoi vlasti. Ianvar' 1922-dekabr' 1936 g., edited by A. N. Iakovlev, the primary sources, to archival information, at the same compled by V. N. Khaustov et al. (Moscow: MFD, 2003), 912 pp. 3. V. I. Marochko, “Rosiis'ki arkhivni dzherela ta zbirnyky time bearing in mind that, for the most part, the most dokumentiv pro prychyny ta obstavyny holodomoru.” In Holod 1932- striking documents have already been published. 33 v Ukraini: Prychyny ta naslidky, ed. V. M. Lytvyn (Kyiv: Naukova Archival documentation containing information on Dumka, 2003), 41-50. the Holodomor is held in the state archives of Ukraine,1 4. Halyna Kapustian, “Holodomor 1932-33 r.r. v Ukraini za materialamy moskovs'kykh arkhiviv.” In Try holodomory v Ukraini as well as the archives of governmental entities in v XX st.: Pohliad iz s'ohodennia. Materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi states that were directly related to its organization, or konferentsii (Kyiv: Ukrains'ka vydavnycha spilka, 2003), 87-109. 5. D. N. Khubova, “Chernye doski: tabula rasa golod 1932- 1. See: R. Ia. Pyrih, “Dokumenty z istorii' holodu u fondakh 33 godov v ustnykh svidetel'stvakh,” in Golod 1932-1933 godov. arkhivoskhovyshch Ukrainy,” Ukrains'kyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 5 Sbornik statei, edited by Iu. N. Afanas'ev (Moscow: RGGU, 1995), (2003): 82-101. 67-88. Russian institutions of memory (archives, museums, The Russian State Archive of Socio-Political libraries), while a thematic analysis of such historical History sources might well become a separate project. The This archive was formed out of the previous Central present survey was carried out as an attempt to Party Archive of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism of distinguish the aggregate of documented history bearing the CC CPSU and, in consequence, inherited holdings on the “organization” of the Holodomor in Ukraine in that are especially valuable for study of the Holodomor 1932-33 within the context of a broader theme, namely, in Ukraine. Here have also been deposited part of the “Archival Ucrainica in the Russian Federation.” fonds from the Archive of the President of the Russian The documents bearing information that directly Federation. Of the 689 fonds in the archive, of particular or indirectly reflects different aspects of the problem interest are the CC CPSU fond (f. 17), and the personal are concentrated in the State Archive of the Russian fonds of Joseph Stalin (f. 558), Lazar Kaganovich (f. Federation, the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political 81), and Viacheslav Molotov (f. 82). History, the Russian State Archive of the Economy, the The CC CPSU fond holds documents of the Russian State Military Archive, the Russian State Archive collective CC organs: the Plenums, Politburo, Orgburo, of Literature and Art, the Archive of the President of the the CC Secretariat and apparat. Here are minutes of Russian Federation, the Central Archive of the Federal meetings, stenographic reports, decisions of the CC Security Service of Russia, as well as the governmental VKP(b) [All-Union Communist Party (of Bolsheviks)], archives of the Briansk, Voronezh, Novosibirsk, and also official correspondence regarding organization of Sverdlovsk oblasts, the Krasnodar and Primorskoy krais, grain delivery. The Ukrainian aspect is clearly reflected, the Center for Documentation of the Recent History of particularly in the following decisions of the CC VKP(b) the Krasnodar krai, and the Kursk and Voronezh oblast and the Council of Peoples' Commissars of the USSR: State Archives of Socio-Political History. The nature, form, and contents of these documents (a) On grain delivery in Ukraine, the North were determined by the function they were intended to Caucasus, and in the Western oblast dated December 14, perform, as well as by the authority and duties of the 1932. This authorized the deportation of peasants to the bodies whose activities generated them. Direct evidence North (and also the Communists who failed to squeeze regarding the organization of a “man-made” famine grain out of them). It forbade Ukrainianization in the among the peasantry is to be found in documents of Kuban and called, as something not to be delayed, for an official provenance: legislative and other normative the Ukrainian language in official dealings and the mass acts; minutes of meetings and decisions of the Politburo media to be replaced by Russian, that being the language CC CPSU (Central Committee of the Communist “more understood by the Kuban population.” Party of the Soviet Union) and Party organs of various (b) On Ukrainianization in the Far Eastern krai, levels; stenographic reports of congresses, plenums, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, the Central Chernozem consultations, devoted to questions bearing on all oblast, and other regions of the USSR, dated December aspects of the grain-delivery campaigns of 1931-33; 15, 1932, intended by autumn, 1933, to convert the press diplomatic documents reflecting the international and educational institutions to the Russian language, thus context of the problem; documents resulting from forbidding their native tongue to Ukrainians re-settled in actions of the government's executive organs; special these regions. bulletins; circulars; informational summaries; records (c) On grain delivery in Ukraine, dated December 19, of interrogations; official correspondence; documents of 1932. This decision pointed to the “unserious attitude” personal origin; auto-communicative documents (diaries, of the Ukrainian leaders to the grain-delivery campaign, memoirs); personal letters; and oral history. and sent Kaganovich and Pavel Postyshev to Ukraine. Documentation that reflects the problem or its individual aspects indirectly might include the statistics These official documents are currently in scholarly which record the dynamics of mortality rates; documents circulation both in works of historical research and in from bodies which organized and effected the export of published collections: Holod 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: grain; documents generated by activities of transport ochyma istorykiv, movoiu dokumentiv (The Famine of firms involved in grain export; documents that reflect 1932-1933 in Ukraine: through the eyes of historians, the deportation and re-settlement of peasants from and the language of documents, Kyiv 1990); Komandyry Ukraine and the Kuban; etc. The majority of documents velykoho holodu (Commanders of the Great Famine, is classified “Confidential” or “Secret.” Kyiv 2001), and others.
Recommended publications
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS

    Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS

    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
  • Chapter 6 the UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters

    Chapter 6 the UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters

    Chapter 6 THE UKRAINIAN FAMINE by Lyman H. Legters On the eve of the Bolshevik Revolution, European In the mind of Stalin, the problem of the Social Democrats, including their Russian branch, held Ukrainian peasants who resisted collectivization generally to two items of received doctrinal wisdom was linked with the problem of Ukrainian that would bear ultimately on the calamity of the early nationalism. Collectivization was imposed on the 1930s in the Ukraine. One of these was the belief that Ukraine much faster than it was on other parts the rural agricultural economy, along with its associated of the Soviet Union. The resulting hardship in social order, was to undergo capitalist kinds of develop­ the Ukraine was deliberately intensified by a ment as a necessary prelude to the introduction of policy of unrelenting grain procurement. It was socialism in the countryside. That expectation could this procurement policy that transformed be traced directly back to Marx and Engels. The other hardship into catastrophe. Famine by itself is not belief had been fashioned more recently in the multina­ genocide, but the consequences of the policy were tional empires of Habsburg and Romanov and taught known and remedies were available. The that ethnic diversity, presumed to be a vestigial social evidence is quite powerful that the famine could fact that would eventually disappear, might be accom­ have been avoided, hence the argument turns on modated in a centralized political system by permitting, Stalin's intentions. perhaps even encouraging, cultural autonomy. 1 In the Russian case, the first of these propositions was confounded initially in two ways.
  • The Great Famine in Soviet Ukraine: Toward New Avenues Of

    The Great Famine in Soviet Ukraine: Toward New Avenues Of

    THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Troy Philip Reisenauer In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major Department: History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies June 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR By Troy Philip Reisenauer The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. John K. Cox Chair Dr. Tracy Barrett Dr. Dragan Miljkovic Approved: July 10, 2014 Dr. John K. Cox Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Famine spread across the Union of Social Soviet Republics in 1932 and 1933, a deadly though unanticipated consequence of Joseph Stalin’s attempt in 1928 to build socialism in one country through massive industrialization and forced collectivization of agriculture known as the first Five-Year Plan. This study uses published documents, collections, correspondence, memoirs, secondary sources and new insight to analyze the famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine and other Soviet republics. It presents the major scholarly works on the famine, research that often mirrors the diverse views and bitter public disagreement over the issue of intentionality and the ultimate culpability of Soviet leadership. The original contribution of this study is in the analysis of newly published primary documents of the 1920s and 1930s from the Russian Presidential Archives, especially vis-à-vis the role of Stalin and his chief lieutenants at the center of power and the various representatives at the republic-level periphery.
  • Ukrainians Lose Their Farms

    Ukrainians Lose Their Farms

    Ukrainians Lose Their Farms 0. Ukrainians Lose Their Farms - Story Preface 1. Holodomor - Roots of a Man-Made Disaster 2. Resurgence of Ukrainian Nationalism 3. Stalin Cracks Down on Ukraine 4. Ukrainians Lose Their Farms 5. Ukrainians Lose Their Crops 6. Ukrainians Starve 7. Ukrainians Die from Hunger 8. Soviets Cover-up Ukrainian Starvation 9. Russia Acknowledges the Holodomor When the Soviets denied there was a famine in Ukraine, man-made or natural, a Cardinal from Austria, Theodor Innitzer—who was also the Archbishop of Vienna—began an awareness-raising campaign in the West. This image, by an unnamed photographer, is from the Innitzer Collection. It depicts a Ukrainian woman and child “being kicked out of their home.” To pay for Western technology, as he transforms the Soviet Union into an industrial powerhouse, Stalin will appropriate Ukraine’s farm crops. How will he get the grain from Europe’s breadbasket? By devising and implementing his control in new autocratic ways. Thus begins the collectivization of Soviet farms, including Ukrainian farms. By merely speaking the words—“The State owns your land, your homes, your animals, your fields, your barns, your equipment”—Stalin takes over. On the order of the Soviet leader, supported by his Politburo comrades, Ukrainian farmers will become laborers who work for the State, not for themselves. Farmers will be just like laborers who work in factories. The State will own the land, the equipment, the seeds and everything which formerly belonged to individual farmers and their families. Gone are the days of family ownership. Gone are the days of working for oneself.
  • The Ukrainian Holodomor

    The Ukrainian Holodomor

    "I address you on behalf of a na6on that lost about ten m;Won people as a result of the Holodomor genodde ... We ;ns;st that the world learn the truth about all cn"mes aga;nst human;ty. Thjs ;s the only way we can ensure that cn"mjnals w;[l no longer be emboldened by ;ndifference". Viktor Yushchenko, President of Ukraine 1 Starving girl on a street of Kharkiv, the then capital of Soviet Ukraine. Photo by Winnerberger, 1933* Children comprised one-third of the Holodomor victims in Ukraine. Large numbers of children were orphaned and became homeless. IN THE EARLY 1930s, in the very heart of Europe - in a region considered to be the Soviet THE HOLODOMOR Union's breadbasket - Stalin's (based on two Ukrainian words: Communist regime committed a holod - 'hunger, starvation, horrendous act of genocide famine,' and moryty - 'to induce against millions of Ukrainians. suffering, to kill') was an act of An ancient nation of agriculturists genocide against the Ukrainian people, committed by the Soviet was subjected to starvation, one Communist regime in 1932-33. of the most ruthless forms of * In order to prevent exposure of the terrible crimes against the Ukrainian population to both the Soviet and foreign public, the repressive Soviet regime posed a strict controls over any trips into the areas hit by starvation. For this reason, there were few photos taken . 2 #The Great Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Holodomor), which took from 7 million to 10 million innocent lives and became a national tragedy for the Ukrainian people".
  • The Holodomor of 1932-33: Papers from the 75Th-Anniversary

    The Holodomor of 1932-33: Papers from the 75Th-Anniversary

    The Holodomor of 1932-33 Papers from the 75th-Anniversary Conference on the Ukrainian Famine-Genocide University of Toronto, November 1, 2007 THE HARRIMAN REVIEW November 2008 HARRIMAN REVIEW Volume 16, Number 2 November 2008 The Holodomor of 1932-33 Papers from the 75th-Anniversary Conference on the Ukrainian Famine-Genocide Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (University of Alberta) Petro Jacyk Program for the Study of Ukraine (Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, University of Toronto) Ukrainian Canadian Research and Documentation Centre, Toronto University of Toronto, November 1, 2007 Andrij Makuch, Guest Editor Frank E. Sysyn Preface 1 Mykola Riabchuk Holodomor: The Politics of Memory and Political Infi ghting in Contemporary Ukraine 3 Liudmyla Grynevych The Present State of Ukrainian Historiography on the Holodomor and Prospects for Its Development 10 Hennadii Boriak Holodomor Archives and Sources: The State of the Art 21 Iryna Matiash Archives in Russia on the Famine in Ukraine 36 Cover: “Earth” (Zemlia) by Bohdan Pevny, reproduced by permission of the Patriarch Mstyslav I Ukrainian Museum of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA. The Harriman Review is published quarterly by the Harriman Institute, Columbia University. Copyright © 2008 by the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York. All rights reserved. Harriman Institute 420 West 118th Street, MC 3345, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 Preface diaspora has played a signifi cant role in this process, the hen, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Ukrainian government has played an ever greater role by Ukrainian diaspora communities in the West sponsoring offi cial commemorations of the Holodomor initiated plans to commemorate the fi ftieth W and raising the issue of its recognition as a genocide by anniversary of the Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33, foreign governments and international organizations.
  • Ukrainianization, Terror and Famine: Coverage in Lviv's Dilo and The

    Ukrainianization, Terror and Famine: Coverage in Lviv's Dilo and The

    1 Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 40.3 (2012): 431-52. Available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com. Ukrainianization, terror and famine: coverage in Lviv’s Dilo and the nationalist press of the 1930s Myroslav Shkandrij The years 1932-34 were a turning point in Soviet Ukraine. Ukrainian nationalism was declared the “greatest danger,” replacing Russian great-power chauvinism which had held this distinction since the Twelfth Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolshevik) in 1923. Pavel Postyshev arrived from Moscow to implement the new line, which was that Ukrainianization had hitherto been a “Petliurite” operation aimed at developing a national culture and state, instead of being a tool for bolshevization (See Martin 356, 362-68). Sweeping arrests and show trials were conducted in order to intimidate those who were conducting Ukrainianization and to make the republic completely subservient to the party centre in Moscow. By the late thirties, korenizatsiia (the policy of rooting bolshevik rule in local populations) was seen as best done through Russification, and not through cooperation with supporters of a national renaissance that, in Stalin’s view, had interfered with the strengthening of bolshevik power (Iefimenko 13). After gaining control of the party and crushing the Ukrainian peasantry, Stalin began undermining Ukrainianization by linking it to nationalism and the disasters of collectivization. An incorrect, “Petliurite” Ukrainianization, it was pronounced, had stimulated resistance to party policies, caused shortages in grain-requisitioning and led to revolts. The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party stated on December 14, 1932, that a lack of “bolshevik vigilance” had allowed “the twisting of the party line” (Ibid.
  • N in Ukraine 27 Hennadii Yefimenko

    N in Ukraine 27 Hennadii Yefimenko

    VOL 1 • ISSUE 1 • 2009 n i n o m In Memoriam: Raphael Lemkln [1900-1959] Raphael Lemkin on the Ukrainian genocide Memories of Communist and Nazi Crimes Polish Diplomats on the Holodomor Red Cross Documents on the Great Famine HOLODOMOR STUDIES EDITOR Roman Serbyn Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada Email: Serbvn.Roman@Videotron. ca HOLODOMOR STUDIES is published semi­ annually. Subscription rates are: Institutions - $40.00; Individuals - $20.00. USA postage is $6.00; Canadian postage is $12.00; foreign postage is $20.00. Send payment to: Charles Schlacks, Publisher, P.O. Box 1256, Idyllwild, CA 92549-1256, USA. Email: [email protected] Cover Design: Olena Sullivan, Toronto, Can­ ada. www.olena.ca Manuscripts submitted for possible publication should be sent to the editor. Manuscripts ac­ cepted for publication should be sent to the pub­ lisher as email attachments or on CDs suitable for Windows XP and Word 2003. Copyright © 2009 by Charles Schlacks, Pub­ lisher All rights reserved Printed in the USA Vol. 1, No. 1 Winter-Spring 2009 HOLODOMOR STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLISHER’S PREFACE v Charles Schlacks EDITOR’S FOREWORD vii Roman Serbyn IN MEMORIAN: RAPHAEL LEMKIN [1900-1959] Lemkin on the Ukrainian Genocide 1 Roman Serbyn Soviet Genocide in Ukraine 3 Raphael Lemkin ARTICLES Competing Memories o f Communist and Nazis Crimes in Ukraine 9 Roman Serbyn The Soviet Nationalities Policy Change of 1933, or Why “Ukrainian Nationalism ” Became the Main Threat to Stalin in Ukraine 27 Hennadii Yefimenko Foreign Diplomats on the
  • Holodomor – Was It a Genocide?

    Holodomor – Was It a Genocide?

    Andriy J. Semotiuk is an attorney practicing in the area of international law specializing in immigration. He is a member of the bars of California and New York in the United States and Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia in Canada. A former United Nations correspondent stationed in New York, Mr. Semotiuk has written articles for Southam News Services and other newspapers in the United States and Canada. Mr. Semotiuk is a member of the Los Angeles Press Club and of the law firm of Manning and Marder in Los Angeles. The Ukrainian Holodomor – Was it a Genocide? This year marks the 75th anniversary of the Great Famine in Ukraine. Seventy- five years ago this year, Stalin and the Communist Party of the U.S.S.R. initiated a politically orchestrated grain requisition campaign which, according to those familiar with the events, caused the death of up to 10 million Ukrainians due to starvation. In the 1980s, pioneer researchers like Professor James Mace from Harvard and author Robert Conquest were the first prominent Western scholars to seek to establish that the Great Famine in Ukraine was in fact genocide. It was only after the collapse of the former Soviet Union in 1991, however, that much more evidence of genocide emerged. Thanks to the historical research of people like Ukrainian historian Stanislav Kulchytsky working with the Institute of the History of Ukraine in Kyiv, the pioneering work of Yuri Shapoval and his colleagues in the historical research group Memorial in Ukraine and a whole host of Western scholars, we now have even clearer evidence of genocide.
  • The Study of the Holodomor and Ukrainian Historiography

    The Study of the Holodomor and Ukrainian Historiography

    Towards a Decentred History: The Study of the Holodomor and Ukrainian Historiography Olga Andriewsky Trent University Abstract: This article reviews research on the Holodomor By historians of Ukraine since the late 1980s. It examines the dominant trends in historiography, the major findings, and the current state of the field. The field itself, it argues, has grown consideraBly and there now exists a critical Body of scholarship on the suBject. For the past two decades, this scholarship has largely Been dominated By the deBate about whether the Holodomor constitutes genocide. Much of the focus has Been on illuminating the policies, methods, and intentions of the Soviet leadership and there have Been notable advances in these areas of research. Social history on this topic, on the other hand, remains largely underdeveloped. Some historians of Ukraine have Begun to study the Holodomor “from Below” and to explore the larger social and cultural consequences of de-kulakization, collectivization, and the Terror- Famine. This approach is crucial, the author suggests, to understanding the exceptional nature of the era. In terms of patterns of migration, family structure, religious practices, social identity, status and ranking, and attitudes towards power, authority, and political participation, the Holodomor Era fundamentally changed the way Ukrainians lived. In this respect, it represents a turning point, as momentous as perhaps any in Ukrainian history. Keywords: Famine, Ukrainian historiography, Genocide, Stalin ong before scholars in the Soviet Union and the West turned their L attention to the suBject of the Famine of 1932–33 in Ukraine, there was an audience anxious for the story to Be told.
  • Being Ukrainian Means: Only Once, Unless Otherwise Indicated

    Being Ukrainian Means: Only Once, Unless Otherwise Indicated

    INSIDE: • The Russian factor in Ukraine’s presidential election – page 2. • Educational achievement of Ukrainians in the U.S. – page 11. • Snapshot of the election: voting in Halychyna – page 17. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No.4 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 24, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine International observers say Ukraine’s It’s Yanukovych vs. Tymoshenko election demonstrates significant progress in runoff of presidential election Organization for Security ence in the second round of the election,” and Cooperation in Europe said João Soares, president of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and special coor- KYIV – The first round of Ukraine’s dinator of the OSCE short-term observ- presidential election was of high quality ers. and showed significant progress over pre- “Ukraine has proven that it can hold a vious elections, meeting most clean election, even under an incomplete Organization for Security and and unclear election law, confirming the Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and desire of the Ukrainian people to freely Council of Europe commitments, con- choose their leaders. However, a major cluded the international election observa- challenge ahead for Ukraine’s politicians tion mission in a statement published on is to play by the rules rather than with the January 18. rules,” said Matyas Eörsi, head of the del- The observers noted that the election egation of the Council of Europe’s demonstrated respect for civil and politi- Parliamentary Assembly. cal rights, and offered voters a genuine “These elections consolidated the prog- choice among candidates representing ress achieved by Ukraine since 2004.
  • The Crimes of the Stalin Era. — 1956

    The Crimes of the Stalin Era. — 1956

    THE CRIMES OF THE STALIH ERA SPECIAL REPORT TO THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNIOtt BY NIKITA S. KHRUSHCHEV First Secretary, Communist Party of the Soviet Union ANNOTATED BY BORIS /. NKOLAEVSKY tb. new • 1956 • Leader Introduction r. Isaac Deutscher concluded his controversial biography of Joseph Stalin, published in 1949, by classing the Soviet ruler as a “great Mrevolutionary despot” like Oliver Cromwell and Napoleon Bonaparte. It was a historical verdict which many, as unfamiliar with Stalin as they were with Cromwell and Napoleon, accepted. A few months ago, Staling successor and former “close comrade-in-arms.” Nikita Khrushchev, provided the evidence to place Stalin in a class by himself, beyond Caligula, Philip II of Spain and perhaps even Adolf Hitler. Moscow has not published the full text of the Khrushchev indictment: but even this partial text, released by the U.S. State Department, i- a healthy antidote to 30 years of pro-Stalinist apologetics. At the same time, it does less than justice to Stalin’s predecessors and successors. To understand the dictatorship of Stalin, as it is described by Khrushchev, one must also understand the dictatorship of Lenin and of Khrushchev and his colleagues. The Communist party came to power in Russia by force, overthrowing an eight-month democratic regime which had made Russia (in Lenin’s .own words) “the freest country in the world.” The. coup d'etat of November 7, 1917, actually led by Leon Trotsky, was quickly followed by repression of democratic parties and institutions. In December 1917, the Communist terror apparatus, known as the Cheka, was set up, and it has continued to function ever since—under the successive names of OGPU, NKVD and MVD-MGB.