DOCSLIB.ORG

Eurya Luiȯ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.Nanjenshanensisȯ҆┤኱ቌE.Nitidaȯ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.Regechiensisȯ⎔ᢕጁ Ớʠӡㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.Septataȯ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.Strigillosaȯᛤᖛୀ኱ቌe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eurya Luiȯ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.Nanjenshanensisȯ҆┤኱ቌE.Nitidaȯ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.Regechiensisȯ⎔ᢕጁ Ớʠӡㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.Septataȯ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.Strigillosaȯᛤᖛୀ኱ቌe ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 193 بᶇἄࢊ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ *ؖ͏㐓1ȭሯ۹⋀2ȭ⬰೘፪2ȭሯഒણ2 ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠӠㆩŊ቏଼⸅⣬Ӡㆩ⿀હ᧚൉Ŋㅫ␠Ȯ┚ᦸש⤽ȹၪ⣬Ⱥ቏ᶇἄͩЗ⃥Ӡㆩᘍ࿯ ィ◘␕ዘ⿢ᵬُ⿭⡣෼ഐᾀŊҪⶪ׶APGӠㆩ₇⃥Ŋ⸅דሷ؋⡕ᕜŊ╁ાӠぽʠሷᤀŊ゛◘ᄲ⸇ ᅘ⚠᫧⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩřᶇἄ⃌ኞ૽⎔ᢕᮟ቏଼ᎋ᧎⚠᫧ᣅ16ỚŘʑߡ኱ቌE.chinensisȮ⫶ ኱ቌE.crenatifoliaȮӚ┤኱ቌE.emarginataȮׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrimaȮᕜኞ኱ቌE.gnaphalocarpaȮᅽ ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE.hayataeȮᅺ቏኱ቌE.japonicaȮ☃┤኱ቌE.leptophyllaȮ₳ኟ኱ቌE.loquaianaȮᙺᖛ᥸኱ ቌEurya luiȮ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.nanjenshanensisȮ҆┤኱ቌE.nitidaȮ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.regechiensisȮ⎔ᢕጁ ỚʠӠㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.septataȮ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.strigillosaȮᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensisȯᄽʑʏဏͧᒑ ȯ≙אഔ⏨᳈ᦸᾀͧ⿀હדⲩȮ༆↘ߧᦹ ȹ〦⼫⥱Ⱥ኱ቌ଼ȮʽӬቌẤȮୀ⑭ẤȮӠㆩȮ⎔ᢕ Research paper Revised Studies on Eurya (Pentaphylacaceae) in Taiwan Yi-Hung Wu1ȭHsy-Yu Tzeng2ȭChien-Ti Chao2ȭYen-Hsueh Tseng2* ȹAbstractȺThis study attempted to revise the present taxonomy of the genus Eurya in Taiwan with classical taxonomic methods and 16 species were recognized: E.chinensisȮE.crenatifoliaȮE.emarginataȮ E. glaberrimaȮE.gnaphalocarpaȮE.hayataeȮE.japonicaȮE.leptophyllaȮE.loquaianaȮEurya luiȮ E.nanjenshanensisȮE.nitidaȮE.regechiensisȮE.septataȮE.strigillosaȮE. taitungensis.We provided line drawings, photographs of these species, and a key to the species of Eurya in Taiwan. ȹKey wordsȺEurya, Pentaphylacaceae, Theaceae, Plant Taxonomy, Taiwan. ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ૪㊹ኚᾷ᫧⚠Ŋ40227 .1 Experimental Forest, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇Ŋ40227 .2 Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227 Taiwan. * ⳇ⤻̳≛ȯ Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] 194 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ ɺȮԊ⤵ nata (Thunb.) MakinoȮE. glaberrima HayataȮ ೊ∑ୀ⑭Ấ (Theaceae) Қ᫤₎ሷ23଼2,000 E. leptophylla HayataȮE. japonica Thunb.ȮE. ˁᥖ౏Ŋ strigillosa Hayataᾀ 6ỚȯדㇷỚŊʈҚᣅቌ቏ŊӠలˁᙐᥖ౏ ᢕ߸֒໽ᮟୀ⑭Ấᎋ᧎Ŋ⤺ሷ9଼35Ớ (԰ 1938౺ŊKobuskiʑ⥆ⰶ11ỚŊҢʑ૽ש≟ Ꮘ⃻ᾀŊ1988)ŊӠӲ଼ୀ⑭ˁẤ (Theoideae) Pseudoeurya crenatifolia YamamotoⱧẼ⚠᫧ໞ Თ㈭ˁ (Ternstroemioideae)ȯୀ⑭ˁẤᣅ Eurya crenatifolia (Yamamoto) Kobuskiُᅘ࣑Խׂד דኞໞ᥊ᆹ⿭⡣ŊׂᲗ㈭ˁẤᣅួኞໞ᥊ᆹʃ E. chinensis R. Br.ȯ1950౺ŊKeng ⥆ⰶ11Ớ╭ -⿭⡣řⲖ౺͗APGӠㆩ₇⃥૽қˁẤဏ֗ᣅୀ 2⩐ỚŊҢʑ૽E. matsudai Hayata͆ҘE. acum ⑭Ấ (ᨯ∑) ⎞ʽӬቌẤ (Pentaphylacaceae)ȯ inata DC.ŊE. suzukii Yamamoto⚠᫧ໞ⩐ỚE. ኱ቌ଼ (Eurya) ᣅ቏ẤӠㆩⰱ₥ʱʠɺ acuminata var. suzukii (Yamam.) H. Keng Ŋُ ∌Ŋߌ቏଼ᣅィ゛ᯌዳŊʈ␕₳ଅŊ␕ቅᵬŊ ૽E. arisanensis Hayata⚠᫧ໞ⩐ỚE. acuminata ˫ദʠᶇἄघ┮⸅߱कⵒഐ๗Ŋॖ┤ञଅŊㄊ var. arisanensis (Hayata) H. Keng ȯ1962౺Ŋ ؋Ŋ⻔㕗ᄲŊኟጻȮ┤⋍Ȯኞ૪ʠ⡕ᕜ෼ ೺๸සᱹ⠧ᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE.taitungensis Chang ɺ⎞⫨ ഐᾀŊ̟ぜଇᄲ᧚൉ᆙㆴỚㆩकŊബザ༪ӛⰱ ᅘỚȯ1963౺ŊቦฒኚᗺᮢKeng (1950) ⥆ⰶ (Ớȯ1967౺Ŋ԰፨ᬟᾀ (Liu and Lu⩐2דᢕ቏଼ᎋ᧎ഺᡀ 11Ớשᆞ֒ӠʠᅞᘍŊ⿀હʃᆞȯ .ỚŊҢʑ૽E. acuminata var⩐1דᙹ౹߸ɺ᳅⎏ʑतୀ⋸ᙹཥ3400 mᲀሷ࿮ゝ ⥆ⰶ10Ớ .⸉⿧Ȯ suzukii (Yamam.) H. KengُE. acuminata varדŊӠల᳈ᯍೊŊ቏ᶇἄʜ⎏Қ஌⻞₊ ߸࿮ゝ቏଼ᎋ᧎Ŋው⨢Ӡㆩᄽ arisanensis (Hayata) H. Keng͆ҘE. acuminata׳㖂ୀ஌ُ⚄ఊ ૽E. chinensis R. Br.͆ҘE. japonicaנञᐻ቏㈀ҙʠᐻ቏Ŋ⤐ DC.Ŋ׳ᅺ቏דߡҙ≙א᪇Ŋ Ӡㆩ (Thunb.) var. parvifolia (Gardner) Thwartesȯ׳ㅮඖᨊŊ˫З⃥ഐ๗Ӡㆩᘍ⤶ᔌ׳ૣ (ṵ׆(1967آȯ 1972౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀᗺᮢ԰፨ᬟȮ∉ Ớȯ⩐1דᢕ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠ₊⻞আᅠ1896౺Ŋ ⥆ⰶ10Ớש HenryХ⥆ⰶ1ỚEurya japonica Thunb.ȯ1908- 1976౺ŊቦฒኚᗺᮢKeng (1950) ⥆ⰶ11 ⩐3דỚȯ1988౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀ⥆ⰶ11Ớ⩐2ד1920౺ŊHayataᱹ⠧E. arisanensis Hayata (1919 Ớ ౺)ȮE. matsudai Hayata (1920౺)ȮE. glaberri- ỚŊᅘᱹ⠧ɺᅘ⩐ỚE. leptophylla var. tsushan- ma Hayata (1919౺)ȮE. gnaphalocarpa Hayata ensis Y. C. Liu & F. Y. Luȯ1994౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀ ỚŊᅘ࣑E. loquaiana Dunnȯ⩐3ד1919౺)ȮE. leptophylla Hayata (1920౺)ȮE. ⥆ⰶ12Ớ) .ỚŊҢʑ૽E⩐2דstrigillosa Hayata (1908౺) ⤺7ỚᅘӠㆩ∌ȯ 1996౺ŊHsiehᾀ⥆ⰶ11Ớ .1928౺ŊSasaki⥆ⰶ7ỚҢʑᅘ࣑E. acuminata hayatae YamamotoُE. japonica Thunb.͆ҘE DC.ȮE. emarginata (Thunb.) MakinoŊ̟ቍ⥆ nitida KorthalsŊ⚠᫧E. acuminata var. arisanen- .Eד.E. arisanensis HayataُE. gnaphalocarpa Ha- sis (Hayata) H. Keng͆ҘE.acuminata DC⻞ yataȯ1931౺Ŋ᧍⸆૗ठⵀȮዾ቏⒮ᦲ⃾׶Ԋ leptophylla var. tsushanensis Y. C. Liu & F. Y. Lu ᢕᮟ9Ớȯ1934౺ŊYamamoto ń ͆ҘE. leptophylla HayataʠʑŊʏᱹ⠧1ᅘ⩐Ớשːᶇἄ⥆ⰶ .ᢕᮟ12ỚŊҢʑᅘᱹ⠧E. suzukii E. nitida var. nanjenshanensis C. F. Hsieh, L. KשMori ⥆ⰶ YamamotoȮPseudoeurya crenatifolia Yama- Ling & S. Z. Yangȯ1997౺ŊᎫ⳵ᘘᾀ⥆ⰶ12 .ỚŊ֡˒ୀ኱ቌ᮫⩐Ớဏ֗ᣅᅘỚE⩐1דmoto(1933)ȮE. hayatae Yamamoto (1933)ȮE. Ớ rengechiensis Yamamoto(1933)ȯ1936౺ŊSuzu- nanjenshanensis (C. F. Hsieh, L. K. Ling & Sheng ᢕᮟ11Ớȯ1936౺ŊKanehi- Z. Yang)Sheng Z. Yang & S. Y. LuŊᛤᖛୀ኱ቌשkiᗺᮢԊː⥆ⰶ ᢕᮟE. acuminata DC.ȮE. emargi- ⚠᫧ໞᣅᅘ⩐ỚE. glaberrima var. taitungensisש⻞⥆raХ ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 195 (Chang) Y. P. Yang & S. Z. Yangȯ ㈀ (HAST) ᢕᮟ ⠗ᄎずⲋএሳኚᏈ⥶㊹໽ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ש1998౺Ŋኚ͗ષᗺᮢԊːᶇἄ⥆ⰶ (ỚŊҢʑቍ₊⻞E. nanjenshanensis (TAIF⩐2דሷ13Ớ Sheng Z. Yang & S. Y. LuُE. taitungensis C.E. ߡἼ⎔ᢕञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (ᢕᮟሷ13 (NTUFשChangȯ2003౺Ŋ㓳࣑ᘃᾀ⥆ⰶ (ᇜᾀ (2003) ᱹ⠧ ߡἼ⎔ᢕञણᎋ᧎ણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TAIۓỚŊҢʑᅘ࣑ؖ⩐1דỚ (ʠᅘỚE. septata Chi C. Wu, Z. F. Hsu & C. H. ߡἼ⎊ᤋẤણ֢᧎㈀ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TNM Tsouȯ1996౺ŊHsiehᾀ߱Flora of TaiwanὮʷ ߡἼ଩ቺẤ༬ञણ፳ኚ⫏᜺ણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏ (Ớȯ2007౺ŊMin & Barth. ㈀ (PPI⩐1דᦹʑ⥆ⰶ12Ớ (ᢕᮟሷ12ỚŊҢʑ૽ ߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TCFשȵFlora of Chinaȶ⥆ⰶ E. acuminata DC.ȮE. acuminata var. arisanen- ߡἼ݄∑ञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ sis (Hayata) H. KengȮE. suzukii YamamotoȮ (CHIA) E. acuminata var. suzukii (Yamam.) H. KengȮ 2. ߡकᐻ቏㈀ E. matsudai HayataҚ͆ҘE. loquaiana DunnŊ ᅺ቏ቺˊञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TI) (E. hayatae YamamotoُE. nitida var. nanjenshan- ᅺ቏ˊⵣञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (KYO ensis C. F. Hsieh, L. K. Ling & S. Z. Yang͆ҘE. nitida Korthalsȯ2015౺ŊLiao & SuҪᷨ⦓E. ɿȮ⃌ኞ⎞⤽⧄ japonica Thunb.એ߱ᅠ⎔ᢕȯ Eurya Thunb. ኱ቌ଼ Thunb., Nov. Gen. Pl. 3: 67, 1783; Benth. ʷȮቨᅆ⎞ᅞᘍ et Hook., Gen. Pl. 1: 183, 1876; Szyszylowicz in (ɺ) क⤐ഐ๗ʠ⤐ૣȯ Engler et Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 3, 6: 1893; ;ᐻ Kobuski, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 25: 299, 1937׳דቨᅆʙ⣬͗⎊⸆कᅘ㍫ቨᅆૣ⤐ Ớक⤐ഐ๗Խ˫֒Ӡ Ling, Act. Phytotax. Sin. 11: 273, 1966; Li et al. in׳቏㈀ʠ㈀♀ᐻ቏ŊͩჇ ׻ᘍ⣳⃛ʵ⳺ᯍ Fl. Taiwan 2: 607, 1976; Hsieh et al. in Fl. TaiwanلӠㆩ∌ŊҪዾჇߡもᎋ᧎׳ ׻ờȯ⸆क࿮ゝቅ⿵ (2002~2016౺)Ŋぜᅠ᫠ 2nd. ed. 2: 679, 1996; Ling, Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin. 50 .ཞᤫकʏ⢌̳ໞ⍺┤ᐻ቏⇦ᅠߡἼʑ (1): 132. 1998; Min & Barth., Fl. China 12: 447דૣ⤐ࢍ ⎟ञણ፳ኚ₇⍺┤ᐻ቏㈀ (TCF) ʑ˫Јው⨢Ŋ 2007. ʏᅠ2014౺Ԋദᅺ቏ቺˊञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TI) Pseudoeurya Yamamoto, J. Soc. Trop. Agric. .ɺⵒ 5: 351, 1933ח૽ሷ␕໣ኞʠᐻ቏ԅנᒑ⣶ᑁೣᐻ቏Ŋ ቌřኟጻߥዘᨊ໣ң2-4܆౑ℂᢆቌ໣ଅ דૣ⤐↲Ӡʠ␕໣ኞΎએᅠ F.A.A.ʑŊ˫ͧര ŊʻᮝŊ࿢ໞʷӬř┤܈ᮝ⋀߸ဎⲩŊ ỒŊ⡕ᕜ⎏҆᝱ȯד⤻⫐ᶇἄ͐ᮢȯʏ₊⻞࿮ゝ߸ ܈␕ॖៜᠪ໣ʯ᥽Ἴ߸᭔ࣀُࠋ׿ᾀŊⰿՀӠㆩᶇ ׂㄊ⫨Ȯㄊ⫨Ŋଇᄲᣅ₣⫨Ŋ⻔㕗ℳȯ ἄȯ ඖŊィ゛ᯌዳřघ2-4ቕ⌗ᮝř␕ኲᵬ໣ᤀ␕ (ʷ) ᐻ቏㈀ʠᐻ቏ው〇ȯ ኲřଅ␯ᦸ2Ŋ┚ᦸ5Ŋ્એŊ⣰᭺ᨊ࿢ӬŊㄊ ञᐻ቏㈀㈀♀ʠ⍺┤ᐻ቏Ŋ˝₳⤐ ⫨⎏⍍⫨ř␕᭷5Ŋࡣⵒ׶ᮝŊᯆ⣰᭺ᨊŊᱺ׳ᒑ〇 ૣ⥆⻞Ңഐ๗᧚൉कŊˇཞᤫ೘ᒆ˫͵Ⳗɺᔎ ⏨Ȯᛇℂ໣ᛇ₯⏨ř゛␕Ř゛◘5-20Ŋ╁Ӡጁ ⤐ૣȯ቏ᶇἄᒑ⣶ʠߡҙकᐻ቏㈀ॖʁŘ ໣ᤀŊңⲵջઈ໼໣ᤀřィ␕Řઈ໼ʀ̤Ŋ 1. ߡҙᐻ቏㈀ 3-5ાŊᕓા⋙᫏ᄲኝŊᤀⲵջ゛◘Ŋ␕ዘ3-5 ʑतᶇἄずᮝ᧎घᑂඖᶇἄʑൔᎋ᧎ᐻ቏ ⡣Ŋࡣⵒ׶ᮝ໣ⵒӠサᮝȯួኞ㓺₯⏨Ŋ҆᝱ 196 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ .Ӡᣅ2ῃŘጁ♑኱ῃsectרᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ש ໣⡕ᕜŊ᫤ഐ⎏໾᫤ഐ໣⿢ᑫߥഐřỚઈᄲ घŊഐଅሷ⤑Ŋң₳✙ఠᨊℐₕŊ⋙ʮ⩴૗Ȯ MeristothecaȮ᳠኱ῃsect. Euryař6₤Ř⿢ᕜ ठ౹ ኱₤ser. CiliataeȮᕜኞ኱₤ser. TrichocarpaeȮ֡⣫דᗴ⫨ȯʙ⣬Ӡలˁᙐᥖ౏ُˁᥖ౏ ᘱ∌஌ȮҚʊ᮹₎ሷ130ㇷỚŊ⎔ᢕሷ16ΤӠ ጁ♑኱₤ser. MuricataeȮᵬዘ኱₤ser. Brevisty- ㆩ∌ (ծ཮ỚʁӠㆩ∌)ȯ laeȮ⿢ዘ኱₤ser. LongistylaeȮ҆┤኱₤ser. ଼ᑁೣỚŘEurya japonica Thunb. NitidaeŊҠ⤺16Ớȯ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (Eurya) ᎋ᧎ᒑ€ 1. ␕╁ңӠぽ....................................................................................................... ጁ╁኱ῃsect. Meristotheca ȭ2. ┚ᦸ⡕૓ᕜȯ ř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmŊ3ᛖ⡣ ................................⿢ᕜ኱₤ser. Ciliataeֱוȭȭ3. ␕᭷ᛇℂ⏨Ŋ⿭ᄍᆹᯆ ȭȭȭ4. ゛␕␕᭷〙ְഐř゛◘10-14ኝ ...........................................................(15) ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE. strigillosa ȭȭȭ4. ゛␕␕᭷ᑫߥഐř゛◘15-19ኝ ......................................................................(9) ᙺᖛ᥸኱ቌE.lui ᕜኞ኱₤ser. Trichocarpae ........................................................................ֱוȭȭ3. ␕᭷ᱺ⏨Ŋ⿭ᄍᆹʃ ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ5⡣Ŋ⿢2-2.5 mmř゛◘10-15ኝ ............................................(5) ᕜኞ኱ቌE. gnaphalocarpa ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ3~4⡣Ŋ⿢₎1 mm ..................................................................(16) ᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensis ȭ2. ┚ᦸ҆᝱໣ᯛ⡕ᕜ............................................................................................. ጁ╁኱₤ser. Muricatae ᢕጁ኱E.septataש (ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᯛ⡕ᕜř゛◘14-18ኝ ............................................................................ (14 ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ҆᝱ř゛◘6-20ኝȯ ȭȭȭ4. ゛◘6-10ኝř␕ዘ⿢0.5-1 mmŊ3ᛖ⡣ ................................................(4) ׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrima ȭȭȭ4. ゛◘16-20ኝř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmŊ3ᛞ⡣ ..............................................(3) Ӛ┤኱ቌE. emarginata 1. ␕╁ʃңӠぽ...................................................................................................................᳠኱ῃsect. Eurya ȭ2. ␕ዘ⿢0.5-1.5 mm ............................................................................................. ᵬዘ኱₤ser. Brevistylae ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ҆᝱ᤀᕜř␕ዘ⿢0.5-1 mmř゛◘5-6ኝ ........................................... (2) ⫶኱ቌE. crenatifolia ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᯛ⡕ᕜř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmř゛◘6-8ኝ ............................................(8) ☃┤኱ቌE. leptophylla ȭ2. ␕ዘ⿢2-3 mm .................................................................................................. ⿢ዘ኱₤ser. Longistylae ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ⡕ᵬ(ᕺ)ᕜȮⴗℳң↹ᕜŊ゛◘8-14ኝř␕ዘ⿢2.5-3 mmŊ3ᛞ⡣ ȭȭȭ.....................................................................................................................(10) ₳ኟ኱ቌE. loquaiana ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᤀᕜȮⴗℳ⍍⫨.......................................................................................... ҆┤኱₤ser. Nitidae ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmȯ ȭȭȭȭ5. ଅኟጻᤀᕜř゛◘9-12ኝ .....................................................................(7) ᅺ቏኱ቌE. japonica ȭȭȭȭ5. ଅኟጻ⡕ᕜř゛◘12-15ኝ .................................................................. (1) ʑߡ኱ቌE. chinensis ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ⿢2-3 mmȯ ȭȭȭȭ5. ┤⋍ϳ⋸ʃᆙㆴȯ ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤⿢ᑫߥഐř゛◘14-20 ................................................................ (6) ᅽ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE. hayatae ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤Ϊְഐř゛◘10-14ኝ .................................................(11) ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE. nanjenshanensis ȭȭȭȭ5. ┤⋍ϳ⋸ᆙㆴȯ ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤ְᨊགྷ⸒ഐř゛◘8-12ኝ ............................................... (13) ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE. rengechiensis ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤ⓩᨊᑫߥഐř゛◘14-18ኝ ..............................................................(12) ҆┤኱ቌE. nitida ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 197 1. Eurya chinensis R. Br., Abel, Narr. J. China ቹ 00068(TAI)ȯ 379, t. 1818; Kobuski, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 2. Eurya crenatifolia (Yamamoto) Kobuski, Ann. 25: 319. 1937 ; Keng, Taiwania 1: 264. 1950 ; Miss. Bot. Gard. 25: 332. 1938; Keng, Taiwania Li et al. in Fl. Taiwan 2: 607. 1976; Hsieh et al., 1: 258. 1950; Liu, I11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alphabetical Lists of the Vascular Plant Families with Their Phylogenetic
    Colligo 2 (1) : 3-10 BOTANIQUE Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers Listes alphabétiques des familles de plantes vasculaires avec leurs numéros de classement phylogénétique FRÉDÉRIC DANET* *Mairie de Lyon, Espaces verts, Jardin botanique, Herbier, 69205 Lyon cedex 01, France - [email protected] Citation : Danet F., 2019. Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Colligo, 2(1) : 3- 10. https://perma.cc/2WFD-A2A7 KEY-WORDS Angiosperms family arrangement Summary: This paper provides, for herbarium cura- Gymnosperms Classification tors, the alphabetical lists of the recognized families Pteridophytes APG system in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms Ferns PPG system with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Lycophytes phylogeny Herbarium MOTS-CLÉS Angiospermes rangement des familles Résumé : Cet article produit, pour les conservateurs Gymnospermes Classification d’herbier, les listes alphabétiques des familles recon- Ptéridophytes système APG nues pour les ptéridophytes, les gymnospermes et Fougères système PPG les angiospermes avec leurs numéros de classement Lycophytes phylogénie phylogénétique. Herbier Introduction These alphabetical lists have been established for the systems of A.-L de Jussieu, A.-P. de Can- The organization of herbarium collections con- dolle, Bentham & Hooker, etc. that are still used sists in arranging the specimens logically to in the management of historical herbaria find and reclassify them easily in the appro- whose original classification is voluntarily pre- priate storage units. In the vascular plant col- served. lections, commonly used methods are systema- Recent classification systems based on molecu- tic classification, alphabetical classification, or lar phylogenies have developed, and herbaria combinations of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Practices of Sacred Natural Sites: a Socio-Religious Approach for Successful Implementation of Primary
    Medicinal practices of sacred natural sites: a socio-religious approach for successful implementation of primary healthcare services Rajasri Ray and Avik Ray Review Correspondence Abstract Rajasri Ray*, Avik Ray Centre for studies in Ethnobiology, Biodiversity and Background: Sacred groves are model systems that Sustainability (CEiBa), Malda - 732103, West have the potential to contribute to rural healthcare Bengal, India owing to their medicinal floral diversity and strong social acceptance. *Corresponding Author: Rajasri Ray; [email protected] Methods: We examined this idea employing ethnomedicinal plants and their application Ethnobotany Research & Applications documented from sacred groves across India. A total 20:34 (2020) of 65 published documents were shortlisted for the Key words: AYUSH; Ethnomedicine; Medicinal plant; preparation of database and statistical analysis. Sacred grove; Spatial fidelity; Tropical diseases Standard ethnobotanical indices and mapping were used to capture the current trend. Background Results: A total of 1247 species from 152 families Human-nature interaction has been long entwined in has been documented for use against eighteen the history of humanity. Apart from deriving natural categories of diseases common in tropical and sub- resources, humans have a deep rooted tradition of tropical landscapes. Though the reported species venerating nature which is extensively observed are clustered around a few widely distributed across continents (Verschuuren 2010). The tradition families, 71% of them are uniquely represented from has attracted attention of researchers and policy- any single biogeographic region. The use of multiple makers for its impact on local ecological and socio- species in treating an ailment, high use value of the economic dynamics. Ethnomedicine that emanated popular plants, and cross-community similarity in from this tradition, deals health issues with nature- disease treatment reflects rich community wisdom to derived resources.
    [Show full text]
  • List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants
    V\.{). 3 v BOTANICAL BULLETIN NO.2 JUNE. 1913 TERRITORY OF HAWAII BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants BY JOSEPH F. ROCK Consulting Botanist, Board of Agriculture and Forestry HONOLULU: HAWAIIAN GAZETTE CO., LTD. 1913 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF HAWAIIAN NAMES OF PLANTS. The following list of Hawaiian plant-names has been compiled from various sources. Hillebrand in his valuable Flora of the Hawaiian Islands has given many Hawaiian names, especially of the more common species; these are incorporated in this list with a few corrections. Nearly all Hawaiian plant-names found in this list and not in Hillebrand's Flora were secured from Mr. Francis Gay of the Island of Kauai, an old resident in this Terri­ tory and well acquainted with its plants from a layman's stand­ point. It was the writer's privilege to camp with Mr. Gay in the mountains of Kauai collecting botanical material; for almost every species he could give the native name, which he had se­ cured in the early days from old and reliable natives. Mr. Gay had made spatter prints of many of the native plants in a large record book with their names and uses, as well as their symbolic meaning when occurring in mele (songs) or olioli (chants), at­ tached to them. For all this information the writer is indebted mainly to Mr. Francis Gay and also to Mr. Augustus F. Knudsen of the same Island. The writer also secured Hawaiian names from old na­ tives and Kahunas (priests) in the various islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’S Letter
    Planning and planting for a better world Friends of the JC Raulston Arboretum Newsletter Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’s Letter Spring greetings from the JC Raulston Arboretum! This garden- ing season is in full swing, and the Arboretum is the place to be. Emergence is the word! Flowers and foliage are emerging every- where. We had a magnificent late winter and early spring. The Cornus mas ‘Spring Glow’ located in the paradise garden was exquisite this year. The bright yellow flowers are bright and persistent, and the Students from a Wake Tech Community College Photography Class find exfoliating bark and attractive habit plenty to photograph on a February day in the Arboretum. make it a winner. It’s no wonder that JC was so excited about this done soon. Make sure you check of themselves than is expected to seedling selection from the field out many of the special gardens in keep things moving forward. I, for nursery. We are looking to propa- the Arboretum. Our volunteer one, am thankful for each and every gate numerous plants this spring in curators are busy planting and one of them. hopes of getting it into the trade. preparing those gardens for The magnolias were looking another season. Many thanks to all Lastly, when you visit the garden I fantastic until we had three days in our volunteers who work so very would challenge you to find the a row of temperatures in the low hard in the garden. It shows! Euscaphis japonicus. We had a twenties. There was plenty of Another reminder — from April to beautiful seven-foot specimen tree damage to open flowers, but the October, on Sunday’s at 2:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Contenido De Carbono En Suelo Y Biomasa Arbórea En El Bosque De Neblina De Samanga, Ayabaca – Piura
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE PIURA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ESCUELA PROFESIONAL DE CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS CONTENIDO DE CARBONO EN SUELO Y BIOMASA ARBÓREA EN EL BOSQUE DE NEBLINA DE SAMANGA, AYABACA – PIURA. PRESENTADA POR: BR. SUZETTI JUBITZA RAMÍREZ MEDINA. TESIS PARA OPTAR EL TÍTULO PROFESIONAL DE: BIÓLOGO PIURA – PERÚ 2016 DEDICATORIA De manera especial a mi madre, Ursula Medina por todo el amor, compresión, confianza y el apoyo incondicional en cada momento de mi vida inculcando en mí las bases de la responsabilidad y deseos de superación. A mi abuela Julia Visueta y a mi tío Hernán Medina, quienes han sido mi fortaleza para enfrentar dificultades. i AGRADECIMIENTOS Al creador de todas las cosas y forjador de mi camino, a Él que me ha acompañado siempre y me ha levantado en mis continuos tropiezos, permitiéndome culminar esta meta. A mi madre, por su compresión y apoyo durante mi formación académica y personal. Por su paciencia en el desarrollo y culminación de esta investigación. A mi asesor de tesis Blgo. Manuel Charcape Ravelo, por brindarme sus conocimientos y por la orientación en todo el desarrollo de la investigación. A la ONG Naturaleza y Cultura Internacional (NCI) y al Consorcio para el Desarrollo Sostenible de la Ecorregión Andina (CONDESAN) por la confianza brindada y por el financiamiento de esta investigación. A los Blgos. Alexander More y Paul Viñas por sus concejos, enseñanzas, por haber confiado en mí y haberme permitido realizar esta investigación como parte de su equipo. A la Blga. Mariella Scarpatti Gaviño, por haber sido parte de mi crecimiento profesional, por su amistad y por la confianza depositada en mí.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships in the Order Ericales S.L.: Analyses of Molecular Data from Five Genes from the Plastid and Mitochondrial Genomes1
    American Journal of Botany 89(4): 677±687. 2002. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ORDER ERICALES S.L.: ANALYSES OF MOLECULAR DATA FROM FIVE GENES FROM THE PLASTID AND MITOCHONDRIAL GENOMES1 ARNE A. ANDERBERG,2,5 CATARINA RYDIN,3 AND MARI KAÈ LLERSJOÈ 4 2Department of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; 3Department of Systematic Botany, University of Stockholm, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; and 4Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phylogenetic interrelationships in the enlarged order Ericales were investigated by jackknife analysis of a combination of DNA sequences from the plastid genes rbcL, ndhF, atpB, and the mitochondrial genes atp1 and matR. Several well-supported groups were identi®ed, but neither a combination of all gene sequences nor any one alone fully resolved the relationships between all major clades in Ericales. All investigated families except Theaceae were found to be monophyletic. Four families, Marcgraviaceae, Balsaminaceae, Pellicieraceae, and Tetrameristaceae form a monophyletic group that is the sister of the remaining families. On the next higher level, Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae form a clade that is sister to the majority of families that form a group with eight supported clades between which the interrelationships are unresolved: Theaceae-Ternstroemioideae with Ficalhoa, Sladenia, and Pentaphylacaceae; Theaceae-Theoideae; Ebenaceae and Lissocarpaceae; Symplocaceae; Maesaceae, Theophrastaceae, Primulaceae, and Myrsinaceae; Styr- acaceae and Diapensiaceae; Lecythidaceae and Sapotaceae; Actinidiaceae, Roridulaceae, Sarraceniaceae, Clethraceae, Cyrillaceae, and Ericaceae. Key words: atpB; atp1; cladistics; DNA; Ericales; jackknife; matR; ndhF; phylogeny; rbcL. Understanding of phylogenetic relationships among angio- was available for them at the time, viz.
    [Show full text]
  • 583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales
    583 583 > 583–584 Angiosperms These schedules are extensively revised, having been prepared with little reference to earlier editions. 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales Subdivisions are added for eudicots and Ceratophyllales together, for eudicots alone Class here angiosperms (flowering plants), core eudicots For monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids, see 584 See Manual at 583–585 vs. 600; also at 583–584; also at 583 vs. 582.13 .176 98 Mangrove swamp ecology Number built according to instructions under 583–588 Class here comprehensive works on mangroves For mangroves of a specific order or family, see the order or family, e.g., mangroves of family Combretaceae 583.73 .2 *Ceratophyllales Class here Ceratophyllaceae Class here hornworts > 583.3–583.9 Eudicots Class comprehensive works in 583 .3 *Ranunculales, Sabiaceae, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales .34 *Ranunculales Including Berberidaceae, Eupteleaceae, Menispermaceae, Ranunculaceae Including aconites, anemones, barberries, buttercups, Christmas roses, clematises, columbines, delphiniums, hellebores, larkspurs, lesser celandine, mandrake, mayapple, mayflower, monkshoods, moonseeds, wolfsbanes For Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae, see 583.35 See also 583.9593 for mandrakes of family Solanaceae .35 *Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae Including bleeding hearts, bloodroot, celandines, Dutchman’s breeches, fumitories, poppies See also 583.34 for lesser celandine .37 *Sabiaceae * *Add as instructed under 583–588 1 583 Dewey Decimal Classification
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 8 2007 A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Prince, Linda M. (2007) "A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol24/iss1/8 Aliso 24, pp. 105–121 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A BRIEF NOMENCLATURAL REVIEW OF GENERA AND TRIBES IN THEACEAE LINDA M. PRINCE Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Ave., Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The angiosperm family Theaceae has been investigated extensively with a rich publication record of anatomical, cytological, paleontological, and palynological data analyses and interpretation. Recent developmental and molecular data sets and the application of cladistic analytical methods support dramatic changes in circumscription at the familial, tribal, and generic levels. Growing interest in the family outside the taxonomic and systematic fields warrants a brief review of the recent nomenclatural history (mainly 20th century), some of the classification systems currently in use, and an explanation of which data support various classification schemes. An abridged bibliography with critical nomen- clatural references is provided. Key words: anatomy, classification, morphology, nomenclature, systematics, Theaceae. INTRODUCTION acters that were restricted to the family and could be used to circumscribe it.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Environment Programme
    UNITED NATIONS EP Distr. LIMITED United Nations Environment UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.38/4 26 September 2016 Programme Original: ENGLISH Seventh Meeting of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) to the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) in the Wider Caribbean Region Miami, Florida, 2 ‐ 4 November 2016 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE APPLICATION OF CRITERIA FOR LISTING OF SPECIES UNDER THE ANNEXES TO THE SPAW PROTOCOL (INCLUDES SPECIES PROPOSED FOR LISTING IN ANNEXES II and III) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Background.......................…………..................................…………………………………………….…….. 1 II. Annotated list of species recommended for inclusion on the SPAW Annexes ………………………............. 2 Appendix 1: Revised Criteria and Procedure for the Listing of Species in the Annexes of the SPAW Protocol ...... 4 Appendix 2: Annexes of the SPAW Protocol Revised (2016)………………………………………………….........6 UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.38/4 Page 1 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE APPLICATION OF CRITERIA FOR LISTING OF SPECIES UNDER THE ANNEXES TO THE SPAW PROTOCOL (INCLUDES SPECIES PROPOSED FOR LISTING IN ANNEXES II and III) I. Background At the Third Meeting of the Contracting Parties (COP 3) to the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) in the Wider Caribbean Region, held in Montego Bay, Jamaica, September 27, 2004, the Parties approved the Revised Criteria for the Listing of Species in the Annexes of the SPAW Protocol and the Procedure for the submission and approval of nominations of species for inclusion in or deletion from Annexes I, II and III. At the 6th Meeting of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC6) and 8th Meeting of the Contracting Parties (COP8) to the SPAW Protocol held in Cartagena, Colombia, 8 and 9 December 2014 respectively, the procedure for listing was further revised by Parties using Article 11(4) as a basis and the existing approved Guidelines and Criteria (see Appendix 1 to this report).
    [Show full text]
  • ASBS Newsletter (No
    Newsletter No. 164 September 2015 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Bill Barker Mike Bayly State Herbarium of South Australia School of Botany PO Box 2732 University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010 Kent Town, SA 5071 Australia Australia Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 8344 5055 Tel: (+61)/(0) 427 427 538 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Leon Perrie John Clarkson Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 467 PO Box 975 Wellington 6011 Atherton Qld 4883 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+64)/(0) 4 381 7261 Tel: (+61)/(0) 7 4091 8170 Email: [email protected] Mobile: (+61)/(0) 437 732 487 Email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor Daniel Murphy Kelly Shepherd Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Western Australian Herbarium Birdwood Avenue Department of Parks and Wildlife Melbourne, Vic. 3004 Locked Bag 104 Australia Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 9252 2377 Australia Email: [email protected] Tel: (+61)/(0) 8 9219 9129 Email: [email protected] Other Constitutional Bodies Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Affiliate Society David Glenny Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Greg Leach Sarah Matthews Advisory committees [Vacancies to be filled by Council shortly] Financial Chair: Mike Bayly, Vice President Patrick Brownsey Grant application closing dates David Cantrill Hansjörg Eichler Research Fund: Bob Hill on March 14th and September 14th each year. Ad hoc adviser to Committee:
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 193 بᶇἄࢊ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ *ؖ͏㐓1ȭሯ۹⋀2ȭ⬰೘፪2ȭሯഒણ2 ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠӠㆩŊ቏଼⸅⣬Ӡㆩ⿀હ᧚൉Ŋㅫ␠Ȯ┚ᦸש⤽ȹၪ⣬Ⱥ቏ᶇἄͩЗ⃥Ӡㆩᘍ࿯ ィ◘␕ዘ⿢ᵬُ⿭⡣෼ഐᾀŊҪⶪ׶APGӠㆩ₇⃥Ŋ⸅דሷ؋⡕ᕜŊ╁ાӠぽʠሷᤀŊ゛◘ᄲ⸇ ᅘ⚠᫧⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩřᶇἄ⃌ኞ૽⎔ᢕᮟ቏଼ᎋ᧎⚠᫧ᣅ16ỚŘʑߡ኱ቌE.chinensisȮ⫶ ኱ቌE.crenatifoliaȮӚ┤኱ቌE.emarginataȮׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrimaȮᕜኞ኱ቌE.gnaphalocarpaȮᅽ ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE.hayataeȮᅺ቏኱ቌE.japonicaȮ☃┤኱ቌE.leptophyllaȮ₳ኟ኱ቌE.loquaianaȮᙺᖛ᥸኱ ቌEurya luiȮ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.nanjenshanensisȮ҆┤኱ቌE.nitidaȮ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.regechiensisȮ⎔ᢕጁ ỚʠӠㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.septataȮ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.strigillosaȮᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensisȯᄽʑʏဏͧᒑ ȯ≙אഔ⏨᳈ᦸᾀͧ⿀હדⲩȮ༆↘ߧᦹ ȹ〦⼫⥱Ⱥ኱ቌ଼ȮʽӬቌẤȮୀ⑭ẤȮӠㆩȮ⎔ᢕ Research paper Revised Studies on Eurya (Pentaphylacaceae) in Taiwan Yi-Hung Wu1ȭHsy-Yu Tzeng2ȭChien-Ti Chao2ȭYen-Hsueh Tseng2* ȹAbstractȺThis study attempted to revise the present taxonomy of the genus Eurya in Taiwan with classical taxonomic methods and 16 species were recognized: E.chinensisȮE.crenatifoliaȮE.emarginataȮ E. glaberrimaȮE.gnaphalocarpaȮE.hayataeȮE.japonicaȮE.leptophyllaȮE.loquaianaȮEurya luiȮ E.nanjenshanensisȮE.nitidaȮE.regechiensisȮE.septataȮE.strigillosaȮE. taitungensis.We provided line drawings, photographs of these species, and a key to the species of Eurya in Taiwan. ȹKey wordsȺEurya, Pentaphylacaceae, Theaceae, Plant Taxonomy, Taiwan. ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ૪㊹ኚᾷ᫧⚠Ŋ40227 .1 Experimental Forest, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇Ŋ40227 .2 Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227 Taiwan. * ⳇ⤻̳≛ȯ Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] 194 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ ɺȮԊ⤵ nata (Thunb.) MakinoȮE. glaberrima HayataȮ ೊ∑ୀ⑭Ấ (Theaceae) Қ᫤₎ሷ23଼2,000 E. leptophylla HayataȮE.
    [Show full text]
  • Recircumscription of the Lecythidaceae
    TAXON 47 - NOVEMBER 1998 817 Recircumscription of the Lecythidaceae Cynthia M. Morton'", Ghillean T. Prance', Scott A. Mori4 & Lucy G. Thorburn' Summary Morton. C. M.• Prance, G. T., Mori, S. A. & Thorburn. L. G.: Recircumscriplion of the Le­ cythidaceae. ­ Taxon 47: 817-827. 1998. -ISSN 004Q-0262. The phylogenetic relationships of the genera of Lecythidaceae and representatives of Scyto­ petalaceae were assessed using cladistic analysis of both molecular (rbcL and trnL se­ quences) and morphological data. The results show that the pantropical family Lecythida­ ceae is paraphyletic. Support was found for the monophyly of three of the four subfamilies: Lecythidoideae, Planchonioideae, and Foetidioideae. The fourth subfamily, Napoleonaeol­ deae, was found to be paraphyletic, with members of the Scytopetalaceae being nested within it forming a strong clade with Asteranthos. Both families share a number of mor­ phological features, including several distinct characters such as cortical bundles in the stem. The combined analysis produced three trees of 471 steps and consistency index Cl = 0.71 and retention index Rl = 0.70. Asteranthos !'P.~, members of Scytopetalaceae should be treated as a subfamily of Lecythidaceae, while Napoleonaea and Crateranthus (the latter based solely on morphological features) should remain in the subfamily Napoleo­ naeoideae.The Lecythldaceaeare recircumscribed, and Asteranthosand members of Scyto­ peta/aceae are included in Scytopetaloideae. A formal·llWJ!J-pmic synopsis accommodating this new circumscription is presented. Introduction The Lecythidaceae Poit, are 8 pantropical family of trees and shrubs consisting of . 20 genera split into four subfamilies in contemporary classifications (Cronquist, 1981; Prance & Mori, 1979; Takhtajan, 1987; ~ri & Prance, 1990; Thome, 1992).
    [Show full text]