DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Article

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Article ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 193 بᶇἄࢊ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ *ؖ͏㐓1ȭሯ۹⋀2ȭ⬰೘፪2ȭሯഒણ2 ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠӠㆩŊ቏଼⸅⣬Ӡㆩ⿀હ᧚൉Ŋㅫ␠Ȯ┚ᦸש⤽ȹၪ⣬Ⱥ቏ᶇἄͩЗ⃥Ӡㆩᘍ࿯ ィ◘␕ዘ⿢ᵬُ⿭⡣෼ഐᾀŊҪⶪ׶APGӠㆩ₇⃥Ŋ⸅דሷ؋⡕ᕜŊ╁ાӠぽʠሷᤀŊ゛◘ᄲ⸇ ᅘ⚠᫧⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩřᶇἄ⃌ኞ૽⎔ᢕᮟ቏଼ᎋ᧎⚠᫧ᣅ16ỚŘʑߡ኱ቌE.chinensisȮ⫶ ኱ቌE.crenatifoliaȮӚ┤኱ቌE.emarginataȮׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrimaȮᕜኞ኱ቌE.gnaphalocarpaȮᅽ ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE.hayataeȮᅺ቏኱ቌE.japonicaȮ☃┤኱ቌE.leptophyllaȮ₳ኟ኱ቌE.loquaianaȮᙺᖛ᥸኱ ቌEurya luiȮ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.nanjenshanensisȮ҆┤኱ቌE.nitidaȮ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.regechiensisȮ⎔ᢕጁ ỚʠӠㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.septataȮ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.strigillosaȮᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensisȯᄽʑʏဏͧᒑ ȯ≙אഔ⏨᳈ᦸᾀͧ⿀હדⲩȮ༆↘ߧᦹ ȹ〦⼫⥱Ⱥ኱ቌ଼ȮʽӬቌẤȮୀ⑭ẤȮӠㆩȮ⎔ᢕ Research paper Revised Studies on Eurya (Pentaphylacaceae) in Taiwan Yi-Hung Wu1ȭHsy-Yu Tzeng2ȭChien-Ti Chao2ȭYen-Hsueh Tseng2* ȹAbstractȺThis study attempted to revise the present taxonomy of the genus Eurya in Taiwan with classical taxonomic methods and 16 species were recognized: E.chinensisȮE.crenatifoliaȮE.emarginataȮ E. glaberrimaȮE.gnaphalocarpaȮE.hayataeȮE.japonicaȮE.leptophyllaȮE.loquaianaȮEurya luiȮ E.nanjenshanensisȮE.nitidaȮE.regechiensisȮE.septataȮE.strigillosaȮE. taitungensis.We provided line drawings, photographs of these species, and a key to the species of Eurya in Taiwan. ȹKey wordsȺEurya, Pentaphylacaceae, Theaceae, Plant Taxonomy, Taiwan. ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ૪㊹ኚᾷ᫧⚠Ŋ40227 .1 Experimental Forest, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇Ŋ40227 .2 Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227 Taiwan. * ⳇ⤻̳≛ȯ Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] 194 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ ɺȮԊ⤵ nata (Thunb.) MakinoȮE. glaberrima HayataȮ ೊ∑ୀ⑭Ấ (Theaceae) Қ᫤₎ሷ23଼2,000 E. leptophylla HayataȮE. japonica Thunb.ȮE. ˁᥖ౏Ŋ strigillosa Hayataᾀ 6ỚȯדㇷỚŊʈҚᣅቌ቏ŊӠలˁᙐᥖ౏ ᢕ߸֒໽ᮟୀ⑭Ấᎋ᧎Ŋ⤺ሷ9଼35Ớ (԰ 1938౺ŊKobuskiʑ⥆ⰶ11ỚŊҢʑ૽ש≟ Ꮘ⃻ᾀŊ1988)ŊӠӲ଼ୀ⑭ˁẤ (Theoideae) Pseudoeurya crenatifolia YamamotoⱧẼ⚠᫧ໞ Თ㈭ˁ (Ternstroemioideae)ȯୀ⑭ˁẤᣅ Eurya crenatifolia (Yamamoto) Kobuskiُᅘ࣑Խׂד דኞໞ᥊ᆹ⿭⡣ŊׂᲗ㈭ˁẤᣅួኞໞ᥊ᆹʃ E. chinensis R. Br.ȯ1950౺ŊKeng ⥆ⰶ11Ớ╭ -⿭⡣řⲖ౺͗APGӠㆩ₇⃥૽қˁẤဏ֗ᣅୀ 2⩐ỚŊҢʑ૽E. matsudai Hayata͆ҘE. acum ⑭Ấ (ᨯ∑) ⎞ʽӬቌẤ (Pentaphylacaceae)ȯ inata DC.ŊE. suzukii Yamamoto⚠᫧ໞ⩐ỚE. ኱ቌ଼ (Eurya) ᣅ቏ẤӠㆩⰱ₥ʱʠɺ acuminata var. suzukii (Yamam.) H. Keng Ŋُ ∌Ŋߌ቏଼ᣅィ゛ᯌዳŊʈ␕₳ଅŊ␕ቅᵬŊ ૽E. arisanensis Hayata⚠᫧ໞ⩐ỚE. acuminata ˫ദʠᶇἄघ┮⸅߱कⵒഐ๗Ŋॖ┤ञଅŊㄊ var. arisanensis (Hayata) H. Keng ȯ1962౺Ŋ ؋Ŋ⻔㕗ᄲŊኟጻȮ┤⋍Ȯኞ૪ʠ⡕ᕜ෼ ೺๸සᱹ⠧ᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE.taitungensis Chang ɺ⎞⫨ ഐᾀŊ̟ぜଇᄲ᧚൉ᆙㆴỚㆩकŊബザ༪ӛⰱ ᅘỚȯ1963౺ŊቦฒኚᗺᮢKeng (1950) ⥆ⰶ (Ớȯ1967౺Ŋ԰፨ᬟᾀ (Liu and Lu⩐2דᢕ቏଼ᎋ᧎ഺᡀ 11Ớשᆞ֒ӠʠᅞᘍŊ⿀હʃᆞȯ .ỚŊҢʑ૽E. acuminata var⩐1דᙹ౹߸ɺ᳅⎏ʑतୀ⋸ᙹཥ3400 mᲀሷ࿮ゝ ⥆ⰶ10Ớ .⸉⿧Ȯ suzukii (Yamam.) H. KengُE. acuminata varדŊӠల᳈ᯍೊŊ቏ᶇἄʜ⎏Қ஌⻞₊ ߸࿮ゝ቏଼ᎋ᧎Ŋው⨢Ӡㆩᄽ arisanensis (Hayata) H. Keng͆ҘE. acuminata׳㖂ୀ஌ُ⚄ఊ ૽E. chinensis R. Br.͆ҘE. japonicaנञᐻ቏㈀ҙʠᐻ቏Ŋ⤐ DC.Ŋ׳ᅺ቏דߡҙ≙א᪇Ŋ Ӡㆩ (Thunb.) var. parvifolia (Gardner) Thwartesȯ׳ㅮඖᨊŊ˫З⃥ഐ๗Ӡㆩᘍ⤶ᔌ׳ૣ (ṵ׆(1967آȯ 1972౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀᗺᮢ԰፨ᬟȮ∉ Ớȯ⩐1דᢕ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠ₊⻞আᅠ1896౺Ŋ ⥆ⰶ10Ớש HenryХ⥆ⰶ1ỚEurya japonica Thunb.ȯ1908- 1976౺ŊቦฒኚᗺᮢKeng (1950) ⥆ⰶ11 ⩐3דỚȯ1988౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀ⥆ⰶ11Ớ⩐2ד1920౺ŊHayataᱹ⠧E. arisanensis Hayata (1919 Ớ ౺)ȮE. matsudai Hayata (1920౺)ȮE. glaberri- ỚŊᅘᱹ⠧ɺᅘ⩐ỚE. leptophylla var. tsushan- ma Hayata (1919౺)ȮE. gnaphalocarpa Hayata ensis Y. C. Liu & F. Y. Luȯ1994౺Ŋ԰Ꮘ⃻ᾀ ỚŊᅘ࣑E. loquaiana Dunnȯ⩐3ד1919౺)ȮE. leptophylla Hayata (1920౺)ȮE. ⥆ⰶ12Ớ) .ỚŊҢʑ૽E⩐2דstrigillosa Hayata (1908౺) ⤺7ỚᅘӠㆩ∌ȯ 1996౺ŊHsiehᾀ⥆ⰶ11Ớ .1928౺ŊSasaki⥆ⰶ7ỚҢʑᅘ࣑E. acuminata hayatae YamamotoُE. japonica Thunb.͆ҘE DC.ȮE. emarginata (Thunb.) MakinoŊ̟ቍ⥆ nitida KorthalsŊ⚠᫧E. acuminata var. arisanen- .Eד.E. arisanensis HayataُE. gnaphalocarpa Ha- sis (Hayata) H. Keng͆ҘE.acuminata DC⻞ yataȯ1931౺Ŋ᧍⸆૗ठⵀȮዾ቏⒮ᦲ⃾׶Ԋ leptophylla var. tsushanensis Y. C. Liu & F. Y. Lu ᢕᮟ9Ớȯ1934౺ŊYamamoto ń ͆ҘE. leptophylla HayataʠʑŊʏᱹ⠧1ᅘ⩐Ớשːᶇἄ⥆ⰶ .ᢕᮟ12ỚŊҢʑᅘᱹ⠧E. suzukii E. nitida var. nanjenshanensis C. F. Hsieh, L. KשMori ⥆ⰶ YamamotoȮPseudoeurya crenatifolia Yama- Ling & S. Z. Yangȯ1997౺ŊᎫ⳵ᘘᾀ⥆ⰶ12 .ỚŊ֡˒ୀ኱ቌ᮫⩐Ớဏ֗ᣅᅘỚE⩐1דmoto(1933)ȮE. hayatae Yamamoto (1933)ȮE. Ớ rengechiensis Yamamoto(1933)ȯ1936౺ŊSuzu- nanjenshanensis (C. F. Hsieh, L. K. Ling & Sheng ᢕᮟ11Ớȯ1936౺ŊKanehi- Z. Yang)Sheng Z. Yang & S. Y. LuŊᛤᖛୀ኱ቌשkiᗺᮢԊː⥆ⰶ ᢕᮟE. acuminata DC.ȮE. emargi- ⚠᫧ໞᣅᅘ⩐ỚE. glaberrima var. taitungensisש⻞⥆raХ ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 195 (Chang) Y. P. Yang & S. Z. Yangȯ ㈀ (HAST) ᢕᮟ ⠗ᄎずⲋএሳኚᏈ⥶㊹໽ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ש1998౺Ŋኚ͗ષᗺᮢԊːᶇἄ⥆ⰶ (ỚŊҢʑቍ₊⻞E. nanjenshanensis (TAIF⩐2דሷ13Ớ Sheng Z. Yang & S. Y. LuُE. taitungensis C.E. ߡἼ⎔ᢕञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (ᢕᮟሷ13 (NTUFשChangȯ2003౺Ŋ㓳࣑ᘃᾀ⥆ⰶ (ᇜᾀ (2003) ᱹ⠧ ߡἼ⎔ᢕञણᎋ᧎ણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TAIۓỚŊҢʑᅘ࣑ؖ⩐1דỚ (ʠᅘỚE. septata Chi C. Wu, Z. F. Hsu & C. H. ߡἼ⎊ᤋẤણ֢᧎㈀ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TNM Tsouȯ1996౺ŊHsiehᾀ߱Flora of TaiwanὮʷ ߡἼ଩ቺẤ༬ञણ፳ኚ⫏᜺ણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏ (Ớȯ2007౺ŊMin & Barth. ㈀ (PPI⩐1דᦹʑ⥆ⰶ12Ớ (ᢕᮟሷ12ỚŊҢʑ૽ ߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TCFשȵFlora of Chinaȶ⥆ⰶ E. acuminata DC.ȮE. acuminata var. arisanen- ߡἼ݄∑ञણ፳ኚણ₇ᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ sis (Hayata) H. KengȮE. suzukii YamamotoȮ (CHIA) E. acuminata var. suzukii (Yamam.) H. KengȮ 2. ߡकᐻ቏㈀ E. matsudai HayataҚ͆ҘE. loquaiana DunnŊ ᅺ቏ቺˊञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TI) (E. hayatae YamamotoُE. nitida var. nanjenshan- ᅺ቏ˊⵣञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (KYO ensis C. F. Hsieh, L. K. Ling & S. Z. Yang͆ҘE. nitida Korthalsȯ2015౺ŊLiao & SuҪᷨ⦓E. ɿȮ⃌ኞ⎞⤽⧄ japonica Thunb.એ߱ᅠ⎔ᢕȯ Eurya Thunb. ኱ቌ଼ Thunb., Nov. Gen. Pl. 3: 67, 1783; Benth. ʷȮቨᅆ⎞ᅞᘍ et Hook., Gen. Pl. 1: 183, 1876; Szyszylowicz in (ɺ) क⤐ഐ๗ʠ⤐ૣȯ Engler et Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 3, 6: 1893; ;ᐻ Kobuski, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 25: 299, 1937׳דቨᅆʙ⣬͗⎊⸆कᅘ㍫ቨᅆૣ⤐ Ớक⤐ഐ๗Խ˫֒Ӡ Ling, Act. Phytotax. Sin. 11: 273, 1966; Li et al. in׳቏㈀ʠ㈀♀ᐻ቏ŊͩჇ ׻ᘍ⣳⃛ʵ⳺ᯍ Fl. Taiwan 2: 607, 1976; Hsieh et al. in Fl. TaiwanلӠㆩ∌ŊҪዾჇߡもᎋ᧎׳ ׻ờȯ⸆क࿮ゝቅ⿵ (2002~2016౺)Ŋぜᅠ᫠ 2nd. ed. 2: 679, 1996; Ling, Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin. 50 .ཞᤫकʏ⢌̳ໞ⍺┤ᐻ቏⇦ᅠߡἼʑ (1): 132. 1998; Min & Barth., Fl. China 12: 447דૣ⤐ࢍ ⎟ञણ፳ኚ₇⍺┤ᐻ቏㈀ (TCF) ʑ˫Јው⨢Ŋ 2007. ʏᅠ2014౺Ԋദᅺ቏ቺˊञણᎋ᧎ᐻ቏㈀ (TI) Pseudoeurya Yamamoto, J. Soc. Trop. Agric. .ɺⵒ 5: 351, 1933ח૽ሷ␕໣ኞʠᐻ቏ԅנᒑ⣶ᑁೣᐻ቏Ŋ ቌřኟጻߥዘᨊ໣ң2-4܆౑ℂᢆቌ໣ଅ דૣ⤐↲Ӡʠ␕໣ኞΎએᅠ F.A.A.ʑŊ˫ͧര ŊʻᮝŊ࿢ໞʷӬř┤܈ᮝ⋀߸ဎⲩŊ ỒŊ⡕ᕜ⎏҆᝱ȯד⤻⫐ᶇἄ͐ᮢȯʏ₊⻞࿮ゝ߸ ܈␕ॖៜᠪ໣ʯ᥽Ἴ߸᭔ࣀُࠋ׿ᾀŊⰿՀӠㆩᶇ ׂㄊ⫨Ȯㄊ⫨Ŋଇᄲᣅ₣⫨Ŋ⻔㕗ℳȯ ἄȯ ඖŊィ゛ᯌዳřघ2-4ቕ⌗ᮝř␕ኲᵬ໣ᤀ␕ (ʷ) ᐻ቏㈀ʠᐻ቏ው〇ȯ ኲřଅ␯ᦸ2Ŋ┚ᦸ5Ŋ્એŊ⣰᭺ᨊ࿢ӬŊㄊ ञᐻ቏㈀㈀♀ʠ⍺┤ᐻ቏Ŋ˝₳⤐ ⫨⎏⍍⫨ř␕᭷5Ŋࡣⵒ׶ᮝŊᯆ⣰᭺ᨊŊᱺ׳ᒑ〇 ૣ⥆⻞Ңഐ๗᧚൉कŊˇཞᤫ೘ᒆ˫͵Ⳗɺᔎ ⏨Ȯᛇℂ໣ᛇ₯⏨ř゛␕Ř゛◘5-20Ŋ╁Ӡጁ ⤐ૣȯ቏ᶇἄᒑ⣶ʠߡҙकᐻ቏㈀ॖʁŘ ໣ᤀŊңⲵջઈ໼໣ᤀřィ␕Řઈ໼ʀ̤Ŋ 1. ߡҙᐻ቏㈀ 3-5ાŊᕓા⋙᫏ᄲኝŊᤀⲵջ゛◘Ŋ␕ዘ3-5 ʑतᶇἄずᮝ᧎घᑂඖᶇἄʑൔᎋ᧎ᐻ቏ ⡣Ŋࡣⵒ׶ᮝ໣ⵒӠサᮝȯួኞ㓺₯⏨Ŋ҆᝱ 196 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ .Ӡᣅ2ῃŘጁ♑኱ῃsectרᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ש ໣⡕ᕜŊ᫤ഐ⎏໾᫤ഐ໣⿢ᑫߥഐřỚઈᄲ घŊഐଅሷ⤑Ŋң₳✙ఠᨊℐₕŊ⋙ʮ⩴૗Ȯ MeristothecaȮ᳠኱ῃsect. Euryař6₤Ř⿢ᕜ ठ౹ ኱₤ser. CiliataeȮᕜኞ኱₤ser. TrichocarpaeȮ֡⣫דᗴ⫨ȯʙ⣬Ӡలˁᙐᥖ౏ُˁᥖ౏ ᘱ∌஌ȮҚʊ᮹₎ሷ130ㇷỚŊ⎔ᢕሷ16ΤӠ ጁ♑኱₤ser. MuricataeȮᵬዘ኱₤ser. Brevisty- ㆩ∌ (ծ཮ỚʁӠㆩ∌)ȯ laeȮ⿢ዘ኱₤ser. LongistylaeȮ҆┤኱₤ser. ଼ᑁೣỚŘEurya japonica Thunb. NitidaeŊҠ⤺16Ớȯ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (Eurya) ᎋ᧎ᒑ€ 1. ␕╁ңӠぽ....................................................................................................... ጁ╁኱ῃsect. Meristotheca ȭ2. ┚ᦸ⡕૓ᕜȯ ř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmŊ3ᛖ⡣ ................................⿢ᕜ኱₤ser. Ciliataeֱוȭȭ3. ␕᭷ᛇℂ⏨Ŋ⿭ᄍᆹᯆ ȭȭȭ4. ゛␕␕᭷〙ְഐř゛◘10-14ኝ ...........................................................(15) ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE. strigillosa ȭȭȭ4. ゛␕␕᭷ᑫߥഐř゛◘15-19ኝ ......................................................................(9) ᙺᖛ᥸኱ቌE.lui ᕜኞ኱₤ser. Trichocarpae ........................................................................ֱוȭȭ3. ␕᭷ᱺ⏨Ŋ⿭ᄍᆹʃ ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ5⡣Ŋ⿢2-2.5 mmř゛◘10-15ኝ ............................................(5) ᕜኞ኱ቌE. gnaphalocarpa ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ3~4⡣Ŋ⿢₎1 mm ..................................................................(16) ᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensis ȭ2. ┚ᦸ҆᝱໣ᯛ⡕ᕜ............................................................................................. ጁ╁኱₤ser. Muricatae ᢕጁ኱E.septataש (ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᯛ⡕ᕜř゛◘14-18ኝ ............................................................................ (14 ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ҆᝱ř゛◘6-20ኝȯ ȭȭȭ4. ゛◘6-10ኝř␕ዘ⿢0.5-1 mmŊ3ᛖ⡣ ................................................(4) ׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrima ȭȭȭ4. ゛◘16-20ኝř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmŊ3ᛞ⡣ ..............................................(3) Ӛ┤኱ቌE. emarginata 1. ␕╁ʃңӠぽ...................................................................................................................᳠኱ῃsect. Eurya ȭ2. ␕ዘ⿢0.5-1.5 mm ............................................................................................. ᵬዘ኱₤ser. Brevistylae ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ҆᝱ᤀᕜř␕ዘ⿢0.5-1 mmř゛◘5-6ኝ ........................................... (2) ⫶኱ቌE. crenatifolia ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᯛ⡕ᕜř␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmř゛◘6-8ኝ ............................................(8) ☃┤኱ቌE. leptophylla ȭ2. ␕ዘ⿢2-3 mm .................................................................................................. ⿢ዘ኱₤ser. Longistylae ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸ⡕ᵬ(ᕺ)ᕜȮⴗℳң↹ᕜŊ゛◘8-14ኝř␕ዘ⿢2.5-3 mmŊ3ᛞ⡣ ȭȭȭ.....................................................................................................................(10) ₳ኟ኱ቌE. loquaiana ȭȭ3. ┚ᦸᤀᕜȮⴗℳ⍍⫨.......................................................................................... ҆┤኱₤ser. Nitidae ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ⿢1-1.5 mmȯ ȭȭȭȭ5. ଅኟጻᤀᕜř゛◘9-12ኝ .....................................................................(7) ᅺ቏኱ቌE. japonica ȭȭȭȭ5. ଅኟጻ⡕ᕜř゛◘12-15ኝ .................................................................. (1) ʑߡ኱ቌE. chinensis ȭȭȭ4. ␕ዘ⿢2-3 mmȯ ȭȭȭȭ5. ┤⋍ϳ⋸ʃᆙㆴȯ ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤⿢ᑫߥഐř゛◘14-20 ................................................................ (6) ᅽ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE. hayatae ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤Ϊְഐř゛◘10-14ኝ .................................................(11) ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE. nanjenshanensis ȭȭȭȭ5. ┤⋍ϳ⋸ᆙㆴȯ ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤ְᨊགྷ⸒ഐř゛◘8-12ኝ ............................................... (13) ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE. rengechiensis ȭȭȭȭȭ6. ┤ⓩᨊᑫߥഐř゛◘14-18ኝ ..............................................................(12) ҆┤኱ቌE. nitida ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 197 1. Eurya chinensis R. Br., Abel, Narr. J. China ቹ 00068(TAI)ȯ 379, t. 1818; Kobuski, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 2. Eurya crenatifolia (Yamamoto) Kobuski, Ann. 25: 319. 1937 ; Keng, Taiwania 1: 264. 1950 ; Miss. Bot. Gard. 25: 332. 1938; Keng, Taiwania Li et al. in Fl. Taiwan 2: 607. 1976; Hsieh et al., 1: 258. 1950; Liu, I11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recircumscription of the Lecythidaceae
    TAXON 47 - NOVEMBER 1998 817 Recircumscription of the Lecythidaceae Cynthia M. Morton'", Ghillean T. Prance', Scott A. Mori4 & Lucy G. Thorburn' Summary Morton. C. M.• Prance, G. T., Mori, S. A. & Thorburn. L. G.: Recircumscriplion of the Le­ cythidaceae. ­ Taxon 47: 817-827. 1998. -ISSN 004Q-0262. The phylogenetic relationships of the genera of Lecythidaceae and representatives of Scyto­ petalaceae were assessed using cladistic analysis of both molecular (rbcL and trnL se­ quences) and morphological data. The results show that the pantropical family Lecythida­ ceae is paraphyletic. Support was found for the monophyly of three of the four subfamilies: Lecythidoideae, Planchonioideae, and Foetidioideae. The fourth subfamily, Napoleonaeol­ deae, was found to be paraphyletic, with members of the Scytopetalaceae being nested within it forming a strong clade with Asteranthos. Both families share a number of mor­ phological features, including several distinct characters such as cortical bundles in the stem. The combined analysis produced three trees of 471 steps and consistency index Cl = 0.71 and retention index Rl = 0.70. Asteranthos !'P.~, members of Scytopetalaceae should be treated as a subfamily of Lecythidaceae, while Napoleonaea and Crateranthus (the latter based solely on morphological features) should remain in the subfamily Napoleo­ naeoideae.The Lecythldaceaeare recircumscribed, and Asteranthosand members of Scyto­ peta/aceae are included in Scytopetaloideae. A formal·llWJ!J-pmic synopsis accommodating this new circumscription is presented. Introduction The Lecythidaceae Poit, are 8 pantropical family of trees and shrubs consisting of . 20 genera split into four subfamilies in contemporary classifications (Cronquist, 1981; Prance & Mori, 1979; Takhtajan, 1987; ~ri & Prance, 1990; Thome, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Diversity in the Tribal Homegardens of Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern Western Ghats
    Bioscience Discovery, 5(1):99-111, Jan. 2014 © RUT Printer and Publisher (http://jbsd.in) ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print); ISSN: 2231-024X (Online) Received: 07-10-2013, Revised: 11-12-2013, Accepted: 01-01-2014e Full Length Article Vascular Plant Diversity in the Tribal Homegardens of Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern Western Ghats Mary Suba S, Ayun Vinuba A and Kingston C Department of Botany, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India - 629 003. [email protected] ABSTRACT We investigated the vascular plant species composition of homegardens maintained by the Kani tribe of Kanyakumari wildlife sanctuary and encountered 368 plants belonging to 290 genera and 98 families, which included 118 tree species, 71 shrub species, 129 herb species, 45 climber and 5 twiners. The study reveals that these gardens provide medicine, timber, fuelwood and edibles for household consumption as well as for sale. We conclude that these homestead agroforestry system serve as habitat for many economically important plant species, harbour rich biodiversity and mimic the natural forests both in structural composition as well as ecological and economic functions. Key words: Homegardens, Kani tribe, Kanyakumari wildlife sanctuary, Western Ghats. INTRODUCTION Homegardens are traditional agroforestry systems Jeeva, 2011, 2012; Brintha, 2012; Brintha et al., characterized by the complexity of their structure 2012; Arul et al., 2013; Domettila et al., 2013a,b). and multiple functions. Homegardens can be Keeping the above facts in view, the present work defined as ‘land use system involving deliberate intends to study the tribal homegardens of management of multipurpose trees and shrubs in Kanyakumari wildlife sanctuary, southern Western intimate association with annual and perennial Ghats.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Patterns of Floral Evolution in the Ericales
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 166(2):265–288. 2005. Ó 2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2005/16602-0009$15.00 MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND PATTERNS OF FLORAL EVOLUTION IN THE ERICALES Ju¨rg Scho¨nenberger,1,* Arne A. Anderberg,y and Kenneth J. Sytsma* *Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1831, U.S.A.; and yDepartment of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden The diverse and species-rich order Ericales has found considerable interest among systematists in recent years. Molecular phylogenetic studies not only have convincingly demonstrated the monophyly of the order, comprising 23 families formerly placed in three different subclasses (Asteridae, Dilleniidae, and Rosidae), but have also resolved Ericales as sister to euasterids. Most ericalean families are well circumscribed and have been or are currently subject to intrafamilial phylogenetic studies. In spite of all the attention that Ericales have received recently, there remains a major challenge, the still largely unresolved deeper nodes in the ericalean phylogeny. This study aims to improve our current knowledge of the interfamilial relationships by expanding on gene and taxon sampling and to evaluate the evolution of important floral characters in light of the resulting phylogeny. We add a nuclear region (26s rDNA) to already published data sets (nuclear: 18s rDNA; mitochondrial: atp1, matR; chloroplast: atpB, ndhF, rbcL, matK, the rps16 intron, the trnT-trnF spacer, and the trnV-atpE spacer), for a total of 11 molecular markers that include nearly 20 kb of sequences. Our analyses, applying both maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference, resolve some of the deeper nodes in the phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Diversification of Angiosperm
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 122 (2018) 59–79 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and diversification of angiosperm order T Ericales suggest ancient Neotropical and East Asian connections ⁎ Jeffrey P. Rosea, , Thomas J. Kleistb, Stefan D. Löfstrandc, Bryan T. Drewd, Jürg Schönenbergere, Kenneth J. Sytsmaa a Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA b Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, 260 Panama St., Stanford, CA 94305, USA c Department of Ecology, Environment and Botany, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm Sweden d Department of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA e Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, AT-1030, Vienna, Austria ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Inferring interfamilial relationships within the eudicot order Ericales has remained one of the more recalcitrant Ericaceae problems in angiosperm phylogenetics, likely due to a rapid, ancient radiation. As a result, no comprehensive Ericales time-calibrated tree or biogeographical analysis of the order has been published. Here, we elucidate phyloge- Long distance dispersal netic relationships within the order and then conduct time-dependent biogeographical and diversification Supermatrix analyses by using a taxon and locus-rich supermatrix approach on one-third of the extant species diversity
    [Show full text]
  • Eurya Luiȯ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.Nanjenshanensisȯ҆┤኱ቌE.Nitidaȯ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.Regechiensisȯ⎔ᢕጁ Ớʠӡㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.Septataȯ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.Strigillosaȯᛤᖛୀ኱ቌe
    ኚᏈᶇἄખӤ 38(4)Ř193-226, 2016 193 بᶇἄࢊ ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ *ؖ͏㐓1ȭሯ۹⋀2ȭ⬰೘፪2ȭሯഒણ2 ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎ʠӠㆩŊ቏଼⸅⣬Ӡㆩ⿀હ᧚൉Ŋㅫ␠Ȯ┚ᦸש⤽ȹၪ⣬Ⱥ቏ᶇἄͩЗ⃥Ӡㆩᘍ࿯ ィ◘␕ዘ⿢ᵬُ⿭⡣෼ഐᾀŊҪⶪ׶APGӠㆩ₇⃥Ŋ⸅דሷ؋⡕ᕜŊ╁ાӠぽʠሷᤀŊ゛◘ᄲ⸇ ᅘ⚠᫧⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩřᶇἄ⃌ኞ૽⎔ᢕᮟ቏଼ᎋ᧎⚠᫧ᣅ16ỚŘʑߡ኱ቌE.chinensisȮ⫶ ኱ቌE.crenatifoliaȮӚ┤኱ቌE.emarginataȮׂ┤኱ቌE. glaberrimaȮᕜኞ኱ቌE.gnaphalocarpaȮᅽ ᮪ᕿ኱ቌE.hayataeȮᅺ቏኱ቌE.japonicaȮ☃┤኱ቌE.leptophyllaȮ₳ኟ኱ቌE.loquaianaȮᙺᖛ᥸኱ ቌEurya luiȮ֡˒ୀ኱ቌE.nanjenshanensisȮ҆┤኱ቌE.nitidaȮ░ⓧᖷ኱ቌE.regechiensisȮ⎔ᢕጁ ỚʠӠㆩဎ׳ד⠧€኱E.septataȮ⁏ᕜ኱ቌE.strigillosaȮᛤᖛୀ኱ቌE. taitungensisȯᄽʑʏဏͧᒑ ȯ≙אഔ⏨᳈ᦸᾀͧ⿀હדⲩȮ༆↘ߧᦹ ȹ〦⼫⥱Ⱥ኱ቌ଼ȮʽӬቌẤȮୀ⑭ẤȮӠㆩȮ⎔ᢕ Research paper Revised Studies on Eurya (Pentaphylacaceae) in Taiwan Yi-Hung Wu1ȭHsy-Yu Tzeng2ȭChien-Ti Chao2ȭYen-Hsueh Tseng2* ȹAbstractȺThis study attempted to revise the present taxonomy of the genus Eurya in Taiwan with classical taxonomic methods and 16 species were recognized: E.chinensisȮE.crenatifoliaȮE.emarginataȮ E. glaberrimaȮE.gnaphalocarpaȮE.hayataeȮE.japonicaȮE.leptophyllaȮE.loquaianaȮEurya luiȮ E.nanjenshanensisȮE.nitidaȮE.regechiensisȮE.septataȮE.strigillosaȮE. taitungensis.We provided line drawings, photographs of these species, and a key to the species of Eurya in Taiwan. ȹKey wordsȺEurya, Pentaphylacaceae, Theaceae, Plant Taxonomy, Taiwan. ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ૪㊹ኚᾷ᫧⚠Ŋ40227 .1 Experimental Forest, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] ʑఱߡ҆⭰250⚦ȯשߡἼʑ⎟ञણ፳ኚણ₇Ŋ40227 .2 Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokwang Rd., Taichung City 40227 Taiwan. * ⳇ⤻̳≛ȯ Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] 194 ⎔ᢕᮟ኱ቌ଼ (ʽӬቌẤ) ᎋ᧎Ӡㆩ⤶ᔌ ɺȮԊ⤵ nata (Thunb.) MakinoȮE. glaberrima HayataȮ ೊ∑ୀ⑭Ấ (Theaceae) Қ᫤₎ሷ23଼2,000 E. leptophylla HayataȮE.
    [Show full text]