Eastern Himalayas Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eastern Himalayas Region Ecosystem Profile Eastern Himalayas Region Final version February 2005 Prepared by: WWF-US, Asia Program In collaboration with: Aaranyak Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment Bird Conservation, Nepal BirdLife International Bombay Natural History Society, India Centre for Environmental Education, Northeast India Royal Society for Protection of Nature, Bhutan WWF-India, Northeast Office WWF Nepal Program Based on the outcome definitions provided by: BirdLife International, Indochina Program Conservation International - Center for Applied Biodiversity Science In consultation with the following stakeholders: BHUTAN Nepal Shrestha, Jay Pal Bhattari, Shivaraj Acharya, Jiwan Shrestha, Jiwan Chhetri, D. B. Adhikari, Mahesh Kumar Shrestha, Tej Kumar Dema, Aum Sangay Baidya, Bidur Shrestha, Tirtha B. Dorji, Lam Banskota, Mahesh Singh, Lisa Simrique Dorji, Tshering Baral, Hem Sagar, Suwal, Rajendra Gurung, D.B. Basnet, Bhupendra Tamrakar, Jamuna K. Kumar, Echay Chettri, Nakul Thapa, Ishana Mongar, D. B. Cooke, Cathryn Thapa, V. K. Mukthan, Vijay Dhakal, Janardhan Thapa, Gokarna Jung Namgay, Kuenzang Faiz, Asif Vaidya, Bunu Peldon, Jigme Gurung, Chandra P. Pradhan,G. K. Gurung, Ghana Shyam NORTHEAST Pradhan, Rebecca Lekhak, H. D. INDIAN STATES Pradhan, Miraj Jnawali, Santa Raj Rai, D.S. Karki, Sameer Arunachal Pradesh Sharma, G. P. Khaling, Sarala Bhat, B.B Tandin Maharjan, Maksha Ram Deb, Panna Tshering, Dago Malla, Samar Bahadur Loma, C. Tshering, Rinchen Manandhar, Anil Maunglang, C.C.S. Wangda, Pema Nepali, Hari Saran Subba, Sunil Wangdi, Mincha Peniston, Brian Wangdi, Tandin Poudel, Narayan Assam Wangchuk, Karma Rajbhandari, Keshab Ahmed, Firoz Wangchuk, Sangay Rijal, Arun Bairagi, Sujit P. Wangchuk, Sherub Shah, Karan B. Baishya, Hiten Kr. Wangchuk, Tashi Sharma, Chandrakala Bhattacharjee, P.C. Wangchuk, Sonam Sharma, Uday Raj Borah, Dipen Ch. Yonten, Deki Sharma, Vivek Choudhury, Anwaruddin Shrestha, Binod Dey, Ashish i Dey, Bablu Lyngdoh, Tambor Simick, Yusuf Dey, Soumen Marak, T.T.C. Dutta, Soumyadeep Noronha, Carmo Outside N.E. Region Goswami, Anil Tiwari, B. K. Aziz, Tariq Goswami, D. C. Chatterjee, Sudipto Gupta, Abhik Mizoram Das, Arundhati Kalita, J. Jonunmawia, A. C. Kaul, Rahul Lala, Sunetra Lalhmachhuana Rahmani, Asad Narayan, Goutam Tawnensa Zafar-ul-islam, Raghunathan, Meena Sarmah, Pankaj Nagaland GLOBAL Sharma, Amit Kent, K. T. Thomas Brunner, Jake Sinha, Hilloljyoti Kire, Keyiekhrie Chhettri, Nakul Teron, Raju Shohe, Khekiho Chungyalpa, Dekila Whiso, Voto Erkhoff, Lies Darjeeling, Frish, Tracy Rai, N.S. Sikkim, Langhammer, Penny D’Souza, Rohin Chauhan, A.S. Miceler, Jon Pradhan, Prabhat Lachungpa, Chezung Pilgrim, John Thapa, Diwakar Lachungpa, Usha Riba, Komkar Chakraborty, Milendu Lepcha, Renzino Sherpa, Mingma Norbu Thapa, Kishore Sharma, Ghaneshyam Tordoff, Andrew Wikramanayake, Eric Manipur Tripura Singh, Tombi Roy, D. Dutta Yadava, P. S West Bengal Meghalaya Rai, D.Dutta Ao, Imtienla Das, A.P. Barik, S. K. Ghosh, Soumitra Choudhury, Dhrupad Lepcha, Pakimu Darlong, V.T. Bhujel, Ram Kharbuli, B. Talukdar, Bibhab Kr. ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 2 THE ECOSYSTEM PROFILE.............................................................................................. 2 The Geographical Extent ..................................................................................................2 The Purpose of the Profile ................................................................................................3 Background.......................................................................................................................4 BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE ............................................................................................. 4 Plant Communities............................................................................................................6 Faunal Communities.........................................................................................................8 Important Ecological Phenomenon...................................................................................9 Protected Areas ................................................................................................................9 CONSERVATION OUTCOMES ........................................................................................ 11 Species Outcomes..........................................................................................................13 Site Outcomes ................................................................................................................14 Corridor Outcomes .........................................................................................................21 PRIORITY OUTCOMES FOR CEPF INVESTMENT ......................................................... 22 Priority Species Outcomes .............................................................................................23 Priority Site Outcomes ....................................................................................................25 Priority Corridor Outcomes .............................................................................................29 SOCIOECONOMIC FEATURES ....................................................................................... 35 Institutional Framework for Conservation .......................................................................36 Nature Conservation Legislation and Agreements .........................................................41 Economic Situation .........................................................................................................43 Infrastructure and Regional Development ......................................................................44 Demography and Social Trends .....................................................................................45 SYNOPSIS OF CURRENT THREATS .............................................................................. 47 Habitat Loss, Degradation and Fragmentation ...............................................................50 Wildlife Killing..................................................................................................................51 Illegal Logging.................................................................................................................52 Floods .............................................................................................................................52 Pollution ..........................................................................................................................52 Infrastructure...................................................................................................................53 Mining .............................................................................................................................54 Forest and Grassland Fires ............................................................................................55 Lack of Information .........................................................................................................55 Insurgency ......................................................................................................................55 SYNOPSIS OF CURRENT INVESTMENTS...................................................................... 55 CEPF NICHE FOR INVESTMENT..................................................................................... 58 CEPF INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND PROGRAM FOCUS........................................... 59 Program Focus ...............................................................................................................59 Strategic Directions.........................................................................................................60 Sustainability...................................................................................................................69 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... 70 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE TEXT ........................................................................... 71 REFERENCES................................................................................................................... 72 APPENDICES.................................................................................................................... 78 1 INTRODUCTION The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is designed to safeguard the world's threatened biodiversity hotspots in developing countries. It is a joint initiative of Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental purpose of CEPF is to engage civil society, such as community groups, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academic institutions and private enterprises, in biodiversity conservation in the hotspots. To guarantee their success, these efforts must complement existing strategies and programs of national governments and multilateral and bilateral donors. CEPF promotes working alliances among diverse groups, combining unique capacities and reducing duplication of efforts for a comprehensive, coordinated approach to conservation. CEPF focuses on biological areas rather than political boundaries and examines conservation threats
Recommended publications
  • Nepal: SASEC Road Connectivity Project: Leguwaghat-Bhojpur
    Initial Environmental Examination February 2013 NEP: SASEC Road Connectivity Project Leguwaghat — Bhojpur Subproject Prepared by the Department of Road, Ministry of Physical Planning, Works and Transport Management for the Asian Development Bank. 16. ii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 21 February 2013) Currency unit – Nepalese rupee (NR) NR1.00 – $ 0.0115340254 $1.00 – NR86.700000 ABBREVIATIONS EPR Environmental Protection Rules ES Environmental Specialist EWH East-West Highway FIDIC Federation International Des Ingenieurs- Conseils FS Feasibility Study GESU Geo-Environmental and Social Unit GHG Green House Gas IA Implementing Agency ICIMOD International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development IEE Initial Environmental Examination IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature JICA Japan International Co-operative Agency LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas MCT Main Central Trust MHH Mid-Hill Highway MOE Ministry of Environment MoPPW Ministry of Physical Planning and Works MRM Mahendra Raj Marg NAAQS Nepal Ambient Air Quality Standard NEP Nepal NGO Non Government Organization NOx Nitrogen Oxide OD Origin-Destination PD Project Directorate pH Percentage of Hydrogen PPE Personal Protective Equipment PIP Priority Investment Plan PPMO Public Procurement Monitoring Office RCP Road Connectivity Project - ADB RAP Rural Access Programmme -DFID RAP Rural Access Program RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete RCSP Road Connectivity Sector Project - ADB iii REA Rapid Environmental Assessment RIP Road Improvement Project- DOR RNDP Road Network Development Project
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Climate Vulnerability Assessment of Gangtok, Sikkim
    February, 2018 RAPID CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF GANGTOK, SIKKIM Developing Disaster Resilience Action Plan Through GIS & Prioritising Actions for Natural Disaster Risk Reduction in Urban Agglomerations of Shillong & Gangtok Gangtok City, Sikkim Gangtok, the capital city of Sikkim, is located in the eastern Himalayan range. The city is flanked on east and west by two streams, namely Roro Chu and Ranikhola, respectively, comprising 17 municipal wards. These two rivers divide the natural drainage into two parts, the eastern and western parts. Fig 1: Gangtok City map Gangtok City Characteristics Indicators Characteristics Classification of the city Hill Location 27°20’N 88°37’E Area 19.016 sq.km Climate Type Subtropical highland climate Temperature Average Annual Maximum Temperature - 27°C Average Annual Minimum Temperature - 19°C Rainfall Average annual : 3494 mm Height above Mean Sea Level 1,676 m above MSL Fig2: The main road connecting Gangtok to other cities Fig3: Gangtok M G Marg and towns Steep slopes, vulnerability to landslides, large forest cover and inadequate access to most areas characterize Gangtok. Unplanned urbanization and rapid construction on the hill slopes has increased the risk of environmental degradation in Gangtok. Hazard Exposure Sl. No Hazard Type Exposure 1 Flash Flood Y 2 Drought/ Heat Wave N 3 Earthquakes Y 4 Landslides Y 5 Forest Fires Y 6 Heavy Rainfall Y 7 Hailstorms/thundering Y Hazard Timeline Index Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Landslides Flash Flood Hailstorm/thundering Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Travel Model of Gangtok City, Sikkim, India FINAL.Pdf
    European Journal of Geography Volume 4, Issue2: 46-54, 2013 © Association of European Geographers ANALYSIS OF TOURISM ATTRACTIVENESS USING PROBABILISTIC TRAVEL MODEL: A STUDY ON GANGTOK AND ITS SURROUNDINGS Suman PAUL Krishnagar Govt. College, Department of Geography Nadia, West Bengal, India. Pin-741101 http://www.krishnagargovtcollege.org/ [email protected] Abstract: Tourism is now one of the largest industries in the world that has developed alongside the fascinating concept of eco-tourism. The concept of tourism could be traced back to ancient times when people travelled with a view to acquiring knowledge of unknown lands and people, for the development of trade and commerce, for religious preaching and also for the sheer adventure of discovery. In fact the system of tourism involves a combination of travel, destination and marketing, which lead to a process of its cultural dimension. Gangtok as a core centre of Sikkim has potential command area over different tourist spots in East Sikkim, which are directly linked by a network of roads centering Gangtok and are perfectly accessible for one-day trips. The tourist attractions of East Sikkim are clustered mostly in and around Gangtok, the state capital. This study shows the tourism infrastructure as well as seasonal arrival of tourists in the Gangtok city and to develop the probabilistic travel model on the basis of tourist perception which will help the tourism department for the further economic development of the area. KeyWords: Eco-tourism, command area, tourist attractions, probabilistic travel model 1. INTRODUCTION Tourism is now one of the largest industries in the world that has developed alongside the fascinating concept of eco-tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Insectivorous Plants in Northeast India
    Technical Refereed Contribution Status of insectivorous plants in northeast India Praveen Kumar Verma • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box # 136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India • [email protected] Jan Schlauer • Zwischenstr. 11 • 60594 Frankfurt/Main • Germany • [email protected] Krishna Kumar Rawat • CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute • Rana Pratap Marg • Lucknow -226 001 (U.P) • India Krishna Giri • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box #136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India Keywords: Biogeography, India, diversity, Red List data. Introduction There are approximately 700 identified species of carnivorous plants placed in 15 genera of nine families of dicotyledonous plants (Albert et al. 1992; Ellison & Gotellli 2001; Fleischmann 2012; Rice 2006) (Table 1). In India, a total of five genera of carnivorous plants are reported with 44 species; viz. Utricularia (38 species), Drosera (3), Nepenthes (1), Pinguicula (1), and Aldrovanda (1) (Santapau & Henry 1976; Anonymous 1988; Singh & Sanjappa 2011; Zaman et al. 2011; Kamble et al. 2012). Inter- estingly, northeastern India is the home of all five insectivorous genera, namely Nepenthes (com- monly known as tropical pitcher plant), Drosera (sundew), Utricularia (bladderwort), Aldrovanda (waterwheel plant), and Pinguicula (butterwort) with a total of 21 species. The area also hosts the “ancestral false carnivorous” plant Plumbago zelayanica, often known as murderous plant. Climate Lowland to mid-altitude areas are characterized by subtropical climate (Table 2) with maximum temperatures and maximum precipitation (monsoon) in summer, i.e., May to September (in some places the highest temperatures are reached already in April), and average temperatures usually not dropping below 0°C in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvedforestharvesting and Reduced Impact Logging in Asia Pacific Region
    STATE OF 111E ARI REl^ORI ON IMPROVEDFORESTHARVESTING AND REDUCED IMPACT LOGGING IN ASIA PACIFIC REGION PRE-PROJECT PPD 19/99 REV. itF) STRENGTHENING SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENTOF NATURAL FOREST IN ASIA-PASIFIC , Cover page: Skidding 45, Reduced Impact Logging Activities, " Berau Forest Management Project (BMFP) " Location: Petak 29, Swakelola Labanan, East Kalimantan, PT. In hutani I STATE OF 11/1E ARI REPORT ON IMPROVEDFORESTHARVESTING AND REDUCED IMPACT LOGGING IN ASIA PACIFIC REGION PRE-PROJECT PPD 19199 REV. I (F) STRENGTHENINGSUSTAINABLEMANAGEMENTOF (^)^ NATURAL FOREST IN ASIA-PASIFIC o ITTO I FOREWORD The Indonesia Ministry of Forestry, in its capacity as Task Manager for the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission's Ad Hoc Working Group on Sustainable Forest Management, with support from the International Tropical Timber Organization has implemented a pre-project focused on the application of the code of practice for forest harvesting in Asia- Pacific. The development objective of the pre-project PPD I 9199 Rev. , (F); "Strengthening Sustainable Management of Natural Forest in Asia-Pacific" is to promote the contribution of forest harvesting to sustainable management of tropical forest in Asia-Pacific countries. It is expected that after the pre-project completion the awareness of improves forest harvesting practices will have been significantly raised and political support for the implementation of the Code secured. To implement a comprehensive training programme and to operationalize demonstration sites for RIL implementation there is a need to understand the status of forest management particularly state of the art on forest harvesting in each Asia Pacific country. This state of the art report was prepared by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal
    FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY OCTOBER(JICA) 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONALNIPPON KOEI COOPERATION CO., LTD. AGENCY VISION AND SPIRIT(JICA) FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION VISION AND SPIRIT FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. 4R C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION JR 13 - 031 FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic
    Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic Technical Report No. 3 About CAFF Theprogram for the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) of the Arctic Council was established lo address the special needs of Arctic ecosystems, species and thcir habitats in the rapid ly developing Arctic region. Itwas initiated as one of'four programs of the Arctic Environmental Protcction Strategy (AEPS) which was adopted by Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Finland, lceland, Norway, Russia, Swcdcn and the United States through a Ministeria! Declaration at Rovaniemi, Finland in 1991. Other programs initi­ ated under the AEPS and overlaken hy the Are.tie Council are the ArcticMonitoring and assessment Programme (AMAP), the program for Emergency Prevention, Preparcd­ ness and Response (EPPR) and the program for Protection of the Arctic Marine Envi­ ronment (PAME). Sinceits inaugural mccti.ng in Ottawa, Canada in 1992, the CAFF program has provided scientists, conscrvation managers and groups, and indigenous people of the north with a distinct forum in which lo tackle a wide range of Arctic conservation issues at the cir­ cumpolar level. CAFF's main goals, which are achieved in keeping with the concepts of sustainable developrnertt and utilisation, are: • to conserve Arctic Jlora and fauna, thcir diversity and thcir habitats; • to protect the Arctic ecosystems from threats; • to improve conservation management laws, reg ulations and practices for the Arclic; • to integrale Arctic interests into global conservation fora. CAFF operates rhrough a system of Designated Agencies and National Representatives responsible for CAFF in thcir rcspcctivc countries. CAFF also has an International Work­ ing Group wh.ith has met annually to assess progrcss and to develop Annual WorkPlans.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalaya - Southern-Tibet: the Typical Continent-Continent Collision Orogen
    237 Himalaya - Southern-Tibet: the typical continent-continent collision orogen When an oceanic plate is subducted beneath a continental lithosphere, an Andean mountain range develops on the edge of the continent. If the subducting plate also contains some continental lithosphere, plate convergence eventually brings both continents into juxtaposition. While the oceanic lithosphere is relatively dense and sinks into the asthenosphere, the greater sialic content of the continental lithosphere ascribes positive buoyancy in the asthenosphere, which hinders the continental lithosphere to be subducted any great distance. Consequently, a continental lithosphere arriving at a trench will confront the overriding continent. Rapid relative convergence is halted and crustal shortening forms a collision mountain range. The plane marking the locus of collision is a suture, which usually preserves slivers of the oceanic lithosphere that formerly separated the continents, known as ophiolites. The collision between the Indian subcontinent and what is now Tibet began in the Eocene. It involved and still involves north-south convergence throughout southern Tibet and the Himalayas. This youthful mountain area is the type example for studies of continental collision processes. The Himalayas Location The Himalayas form a nearly 3000 km long, 250-350 km wide range between India to the south and the huge Tibetan plateau, with a mean elevation of 5000 m, to the north. The Himalayan mountain belt has a relatively simple, arcuate, and cylindrical geometry over most of its length and terminates at both ends in nearly transverse syntaxes, i.e. areas where orogenic structures turn sharply about a vertical axis. Both syntaxes are named after the main peaks that tower above them, the Namche Barwa (7756 m) to the east and the Nanga Parbat (8138 m) to the west, in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Jatinga: the Ornithologists’ Paradise Abstract the Village Jatinga Is Situated on the Borail Hills Close to Its Highest Peak (Hempantat) Which Is 6,000 Ft
    P: ISSN NO.: 2394-0344 RNI No.UPBIL/2016/67980 VOL-I* ISSUE- VIII* November- 2016 E: ISSN NO.: 2455-0817 Remarking An Analisation Jatinga: The Ornithologists’ Paradise Abstract The village Jatinga is situated on the Borail Hills close to its highest peak (Hempantat) which is 6,000 ft. above the sea level and is surrounded by different ranges of the Borail Hills from all sides except a small gap in one side, i.e., towards south- west from the village end. The mysterious behavior of the birds flying over Jatinga from September to November has made this beautiful tiny place famous all over the world. The phenomenon which has attracted Ornithologists world over is suspected suicide committed by birds. The first mention of this mystery is found in the Wild Life of India (1957) by the British tea planters and Ornithologist E.P.Gee. The Zoological Survey of India visited Jatinga during the monsoon months of 1977 and got wide publicity from leading ornithologists in Europe, U.S.A and Japan. The unusual behavior of the birds seems to occur due to the peculiar weather conditions at Jatinga. Studies also reveal that the flight of water birds to Jatinga may be attributed to heavy rains and floods and submergence of their natural Harun Rashid Laskar habitat in the surrounding areas. Assistant Professor, Keywords: Jatinga, Dima Hasao, Assam, Borail Range, Mystery, Deptt.of Economics, Phenomenon, Birds, Monsoon. Haflong Govt. College, Introduction Haflong, Assam Just 9 Kilometers from Haflong, the district headquarter of Dima Hasao district of Assam, in the east there stands a tiny picturesque village called Jatinga on a spur of the Haflong ridge which itself is an offshoot of the main ridge of the Borail range.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses from the North-East.Pdf
    ses imp Gl e North-East m th fro 2009 National Knowledge Commission Glimpses from the North-East National Knowledge Commission 2009 © National Knowledge Commission, 2009 Cover photo credit: Don Bosco Centre for Indigenous Cultures (DBCIC), Shillong, Meghalaya Copy editing, design and printing: New Concept Information Systems Pvt. Ltd. [email protected] Table of Contents Preface v Oral Narratives and Myth - Mamang Dai 1 A Walk through the Sacred Forests of Meghalaya - Desmond Kharmawphlang 9 Ariju: The Traditional Seat of Learning in Ao Society - Monalisa Changkija 16 Meanderings in Assam - Pradip Acharya 25 Manipur: Women’s World? - Tayenjam Bijoykumar Singh 29 Tlawmngaihna: Uniquely Mizo - Margaret Ch. Zama 36 Cultural Spaces: North-East Tradition on Display - Fr. Joseph Puthenpurakal, DBCIC, Shillong 45 Meghalaya’s Underground Treasures - B.D. Kharpran Daly 49 Tripura: A Composite Culture - Saroj Chaudhury 55 Annexure I: Excerpts on the North-East from 11th Five Year Plan 62 Annexure II: About the Authors 74 Preface The north-eastern region of India is a rich tapestry of culture and nature. Breathtaking flora and fauna, heritage drawn from the ages and the presence of a large number of diverse groups makes this place a treasure grove. If culture represents the entire gamut of relationships which human beings share with themselves as well as with nature, the built environment, folk life and artistic activity, the north-east is a ‘cultural and biodiversity hotspot’, whose immense potential is beginning to be recognised. There is need for greater awareness and sensitisation here, especially among the young. In this respect, the National Knowledge Commission believes that the task of connecting with the north-east requires a multi-pronged approach, where socio-economic development must accompany multi-cultural understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Role of the Red Queen and Court Jester As Drivers of The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/198960; this version posted October 5, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Running head 2 TESTING THE RED QUEEN AND COURT JESTER 3 4 Title 5 Testing the role of the Red Queen and Court Jester as drivers of the 6 macroevolution of Apollo butterflies 7 8 Authors 1,2,3 4 5 9 FABIEN L. CONDAMINE *, JONATHAN ROLLAND , SEBASTIAN HÖHNA , FELIX A. H. 3 2 10 SPERLING † AND ISABEL SANMARTÍN † 11 12 Authors’ addresses 13 1 CNRS, UMR 5554 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (Université de Montpellier | CNRS 14 | IRD | EPHE), Montpellier, France; 15 2 Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de 16 Murillo, 2; 28014 Madrid, Spain; 17 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E9, AB, Canada; 18 4 Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 19 5 Division of Evolutionary Biology, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München, Grosshaderner 20 Strasse 2, Planegg-Martinsried 82152, Germany 21 22 † Co-senior authors. 23 Corresponding author (*): Fabien L. Condamine, CNRS, UMR 5554 Institut des Sciences de 24 l’Evolution (Université de Montpellier), Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France. 25 Phone: +336 749 322 96 | E-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/198960; this version posted October 5, 2017.
    [Show full text]