Nevada Bureau of Mines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nevada Bureau of Mines NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES Vernon E. Scheid, Director BULLETIN 67 GEOLOGY OF THE ROWLAND QUADRANGLE, ELK0 COUNTY, NEVADA BY Kent Bushnell MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA Reno, Nevada 1967 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword .............................................................................................................. v Abstract ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Location and accessibility.............................................................................. 1 Previous work .............................................................................................. 1 Present work and acknowledgments.............................................................. 3 Geography............................................................................................................ 3 Physical features ............................................................................................ 3 Climate. vegetation. and culture .................................................................... Paleozoic stratigraphy........................................................................................... Regional setting............................................................................................ Local setting.................................................................................................. Stratigraphy 'of the southern part of the quadrangle ...................................... Sunflower Formation ............................................................................ Occurrence. and thickness .............................................................. Descnption ................................................................................... Basal conglomerate member .................... .. ........................ Limestone member ................................................................ Age ............................................................................................... 7 Tennessee Mountain Formation ............................................................ 8 Occurrence. and age ...................................................................... 8 Description .................................................................................... 8 Paleozoic(?) phyllite (Pzp)................................................................... 9 Prospect Mountain(?) Quartzite................ ....... ............................. 9 Occurrence .................................................................................... 9 . Description ................................................................................... 10 Age and correlation ................ .. ................................................ 10 Stratigraphy of the northern part of the quadrangle ...................................... 11 Diamond A Formation .......................................................................... 12 Occurrence. .................................................................................... 12 Description .................................................................................. 13 Age and correlation........... .. ....................................................... 14 Paleozoic argillite and phyllite (Pza) .................................................... 14 Pza ,................ ...... ................................................................. 14 Pza ,............................................................................................... 15 Pza ,.............................................................................................. 15 Paleozoic. schist. and limestone (Pzb) .................................................... 15 Paleozoic hmestone (Pzc) ................. .... ....................................... 16 Pzc, ............................................................................................... 16 Pzc ,.............................................................................................. 16 Paleozoic limestone and argillite (Pzd) ................................................ 16 Age and correlation of formations below the Diamond A Limestone.... 17 Intrusive rocks. ..................................................................................................... 18 Gramtic stocks.............................................................................................. 18 Coffeepot stock........... ...... .................................................................... Deep Creek stock.................................................................................. Contact metamorphism and metasomatism........................................... Associated. veins and dikes .................................................................... Ongn of the stocks............................................................................... Age of the granites ................................................................................ Dikes ............................................................................................................ Cenozoic rocks and geomorphology....... ... ................. ........................................... Middle Cenozoic........................................................................................... Bieroth Andesite................................................................................... Jarbidge Rhyolite................................................................................. STATE OF NEVADA PAULLAXALT, Governor UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA CHARLESJ. ARMSTRONG, President NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES NEVADA MI N l NG ANALYTICAL LABORATORY VERNONE. SCHEID,Director JOHNH. SCHILLING,Acfing Associafe Director For sole by Nevada Bureau of Mines, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89507. Price $2.50 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword ............................................................................................................... v Abstract ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 ... Location and accesslb~llty.............................................................................. 1 Previous work ............................................................................................... 1 Present work and acknowledgments .............................................................. 3 Geography............................................................................................................ 3 Physical features ............................................................................................ 3 Climate, vegetation, and culture .................................................................... 4 Paleozoic stratigraphy ........................................................................................... 4 Regional setting............................................................................................ 4 Local setting.................................................................................................. 5 Stratigraphy of the southern part of the quadrangle ...................................... 5 Sunflower Formation ............................................................................ 5 Occurrence. and thickness .............................................................. 5 Descnptlon ................................................................................... 5 Basal conglomerate member .................................................. 5 Limestone member ................................................................ 6 Age ............................................................................................... 7 Tennessee Mountain Formation ............................................................ 8 Occurrence. and age ...................................................................... 8 Descnphon .................................................................................... 8 Paleozoic(?) phyllite (Pzp)................................................................... 9 Prospect Mountain(?) Quartzite .......................................................... 9 Occurrence.................................................................................... 9 . Descnphon .................................................................................... 10 Age and correlation .................................................................. 10 Stratigraphy of the northern part of the quadrangle ...................................... 11 . Dlamond A Formation .......................................................................... 12 Occurrence. ......... ....... ............................................................. 12 Descnpt~on................................................................................... 13 Age and correlation....................................................................... 14 Paleozoic argillite and phyllite (Pza) .................................................... 14 Pza ,................................................................................................ 14 Pza ,..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout
    Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout #35 JARBIDGE clamper year 6019 Brought to you by Julia C. Bulette chapter 1864, E Clampus Vitus Researched and interpreted by Jeffrey D. Johnson XNGH, Clamphistorian at chapter 1864 Envisioned by Noble Grand Humbug Bob Stransky Dedicated to Young Golddigging Widders and Old Orphans 2014 c.e. Why Why yes, Jarbidge is a ''fer piece'' from any place. This year's junk trip has the unique quirk that it is not in the Great Basin like the rest of our territory. Northern Elko County is drained by the tributaries of the Owyhee, Bruneau and Jarbidge Rivers. They flow in to the Snake River and out to the sea. To the South the range is drained by the North Fork of the Humboldt and in the East, St. Mary's River. Geology The North American Continental plate moves at a rate of one inch a year in a Southwesterly direction. Underneath the plate is a volcanic hotspot or mantle plume. 10 to 12 million years ago the hotspot was just North of the Idaho border. Over that time it has moved, leaving a trail of volcanic debris and ejectamenta from McDermitt Nevada, East. Now the Yellowstone Caldera area is over the plume. During the middle and late Miocene, a sequence of ash flows, enormous lava flows and basalt flows from 40 odd shield volcanoes erupted from the Bruneau-Jarbidge caldera. The eruptive center has mostly been filled in by lava flows and lacustrine and fluvial sediments. Two hundred Rhinos, five different species of horse, three species of cameloids, saber tooth deer and other fauna at Ashfall Fossil Beds 1000 miles downwind to the East in Nebraska, were killed by volcanic ash from the Bruneau Jarbidge Caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge Mountains (Updated 2014)
    Site Description Jarbidge Mountains (updated 2014) Geologic setting: The Jarbidge Mountains are located within the northeastern portion of Elko County, Nevada. The small mountain range is located between the Copper Mountains to the west and the Snake mountains to the east and southeast. Basement rocks of the Jarbidge quadrangle include schist, quartzite, hornfels, and limestones. These are intruded by a Cretaceous quartz monzonite stock. The basement rocks are displaced along pre-Cretaceous faults. Cambrian and Precambrian rocks are thrust over and upon Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. The early Tertiary volcanics and conglomerates are displaced along normal faults represented by the Copper Creek fault, which dips gently east. The Jarbidge Rhyolite (Miocene) and all older formations are displaced along three sets of faults that dip steeply: one set strikes northward, one northeast, and one northwest. These three sets of faults are locally mineralized (Smith, 1976). The oldest exposures are sedimentary deposits such as limestones and shale towards the western portion of the area (Scott, 1910). Geothermal features: Gray Rock Mine: The Great Basin Groundwater Geochemical Database lists a measurement of 26.7°C in an abandoned mineshaft well in the Gray Rock Mine (Sec. 24, T45N, R58E). Robinson Hole Hot Spring / Murphy Hot Spring / Kitties Hot Hole: (Sec. 29, T47N, R59E) The first acknowledged proprietor was Kittie Wilkins, who diverted river water to create the Kittie’s Hot Hole soaking pool (1885). Patrick Murphy developed a small resort on the property in the early 1900’s and renamed it Murphy Hot Spring, followed by Harry Showalter, who added a swimming pool and changing rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Combined Travel
    Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.1. Introduction This chapter summarizes the physical, biological, social, and economic environments that are affected by the alternatives and the effects on that environment that would result from implementation of any of the alternatives. This chapter also presents the scientif ic and analyt ical basis for comparison of the alternatives presented in chapter 2. 3.1.1. Analysis Process Most of the data used in the following analysis are from the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest corporate GIS layers. There is a certain amount of error in the location and alignments included in this GIS data. For example, the road layer overlying the stream layer may show more stream crossings than actually exist on the ground because of the different sources from which the different layers were obtained. Some perennial streams may show up on the map as being intermittent. This may also create some inaccuracies as to the exact location and extent of riparian zones. The Forest is constantly working to improve map accuracies and the corporate GIS layers. For the purposes of this analysis, the best data that is available was used. The data in the tables below and in the project record depict with a reasonable amount of accuracy what would be occurring on the ground for each alternative, within the limitations described above. The changes between alternatives remain relative to each other. 3.1.2. Cumulative Effects According to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) National Environmental Protection Ac t (NEPA) regulations, “cumulative impact” is the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions (40 CFR 1508.7).
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus) Cover Illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Watershed Analysis
    JARBIDGE RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS JARBIDGE RANGER DISTRICT HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FORESTS ANALYSIS CORE TEAM: MICHAEL E. MCNEILL, TEAM LEADER JAY FREDERICK, BIOLOGIST BONNIE WHALEN, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST TEAMMEMBERS: Chris Butler, Hydrologist Fred Frampton, Archaeologist Kathy Ramsey, Fish Biologist· Additional Inputprovided by: Gary Johnson, Nevada Division of Wildlife, Region II Jim K1ott, Jarbidge Resource Area, Idaho .BLM Bruce ZoeUick,Idaho State BLM JARBIDGE CANYON WATERSHED ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED Introduction . Page 1-1 Physical Setting Page 1-2 Geology Page 1-3 Soils Page 1-4 Disturbance Page 1-5 Biological Processes and Human Influence Page 1-5 CHAPTER TWO - /DENT/FICA T/ON OF ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS Key Questions Page 2-1 CHAPTER THREE - DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS Stream Order Page 3-1 Hydrologic Regime Page 3-1 Headwater Morphology Page 3-1 Valley Bottom Morphology Page 3-1 Channel Morphology Page 3-2 Substrate Page Width/Depth Ratio Page 3-5 Pools and large Wood 3-5 Water Quality· Page 3-7 Heavy Metals Page 3-7 Temperature Page 3-7 Other Water Quality Concerns Page 3-10 Soils Page 3-10 Vegetation Page 3-10 Riparian Vegetation Page 3-12 Macros Page 3-12 CHAPTER FOUR - DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE CONDITIONS Biological Processes and Human Influence . Page 4-1 Beaver Page 4-1 Livestock Page 4-2 Mining Page 4-5 Mining and Water quality Page 4-5 Temperature Page 4-6 Roads Page 4-6 Vegetation Page 4-7 Channel Morphology Page 4-8 CHAPTER FIVE - SYNTHESIS AND INTERPRETATION OF INFORMATION Summary Page 5.1 CHAPTER SIX - RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations Page 6.1 Data Shortcomings Page 6.2 DATA CHARTS AND GIS OVERLAYS Data Charts: Geologic Formations Figure 1.2' Valley Boltom Gradient Figure 3.1 Stream Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Jarbidge Population of Bull Trout
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Nevada Forest Conditions Report
    United States Department Forest Pest Conditions in of Agriculture Nevada 2010 Forest Service State and Private Forestry Forest Health Protection Intermountain Region R4-OFO-TR-05-00 State of Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Front cover photos: (Top) Whitebark pine killed by mountain pine beetle in the Jarbidge Mountains looking down toward the town of Jarbidge, NV, July 2010 (Photo: Gail Durham); (Bottom) Pinyon pine sawfly and needle scale damage on the northeast side of the Monitor Range, August, 2009 (Photo: Gail Durham) Forest Health Specialists Forest Health Protection USDA Forest Service Valerie DeBlander, Forestry Ogden Field Office Technician Forest Health Protection Email: [email protected] 4746 S 1900 E Ogden, UT 84403 John Guyon II, Pathologist Email: [email protected] Phone: 801-476-9720 FAX: 801-479-1477 Elizabeth Hebertson, Entomologist/Pathologist Steve Munson, Group Leader Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Laura Dunning, Program Assistant Darren Blackford, Entomologist Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources State Headquarters 2478 Fairview Dr. Carson City, NV 89701 Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-684-2513 John Christopherson, Resource Program Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-684-2507 ii Compiled by: Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist, NDF DCNR Edited by Elizabeth Hebertson With Contributions from: Dick Halsey, USFS FHP GIS Sp e c i a l i st John Guyon II, USFS FHP Pathologist Jeff Knight, Nevada State Entomologist Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Nevada Forest Pest Conditions Report
    United States Department Of Agriculture Forest Service State and Private Forestry Forest Health Protection Intermountain Region R4-OFO-TR-05-00 State of Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Aspen defoliation on top of Table Mountain in the Monitor Range in Central NV, August, 2012 (photo by Gail Durham, NDF) 2012 Forest Pest Conditions In Nevada White satin moth defoliation of aspen in North Canyon above Lake Tahoe in early September 2012. Forest Health Specialists Forest Health Protection Nevada Division of USDA Forest Service Forestry Ogden Field Office Department of Conservation Forest Health Protection and Natural Resources 4746 S 1900 E State Headquarters Ogden, UT 84403 2478 Fairview Dr. Phone: 801-476-9720 Carson City, NV 89701 FAX: 801-479-1477 Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist Steve Munson, Group Leader Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-849-2500 Ext..241 Darren Blackford, Entomologist Email: [email protected] John Christopherson, Resource Danielle Reboletti, Entomologist Program Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Valerie DeBlander, Forestry Technician Phone: 775-684-2507 Email: [email protected] John Guyon II, Pathologist Email: [email protected] Elizabeth Hebertson, Entomologist/Pathologist Email: [email protected] Laura Dunning, Program Assistant Email: [email protected] 2 Compiled by: Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist, NDF DCNR Edited by Danielle Reboletti, USFS, Entomologist With Contributions from: Dick Halsey, USFS FHP GIS Specialist John Guyon II, USFS FHP Pathologist Jeff Knight, Nevada State Entomologist Dr. Shouhua Wang, Nevada State Pathologist April 2013 ii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Bruneau Subbasin Summary
    Draft Bruneau Subbasin Summary May 17, 2002 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Subbasin Team Leader Carol Perugini, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Writing Team Members Darin Saul, ecovista Anne Davidson, ecovista Craig Rabe, ecovista Contributors Bureau of Land Management, Elko Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Jarbidge Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Bruneau Resource Area Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Idaho Department of Fish and Game Nevada Division of Wildlife Owyhee County Commissioners Shoshone-Paiute Tribes The Nature Conservancy DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Bruneau Subbasin Summary Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Subbasin Description ......................................................................................................................... 3 General Description ................................................................................................................... 3 Fish and Wildlife Resources............................................................................................................ 30 Fish and Wildlife Status........................................................................................................... 30 Habitat Areas and Quality.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Humboldt National Forest
    HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 Edited by Judith Frampton Cover Design by Robin Nunez TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................2 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST...................................................................................5 CONSOLIDATION OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST ...................................................................................6 HISTORY OF THE DISTRICTS.............................................................................................................................................6 D-1, MOUNTAIN CITY.........................................................................................................................................................6 D-2, RUBY MOUNTAINS DISTRICT ..................................................................................................................................9 D-3, JARBIDGE DISTRICT.................................................................................................................................................12 D-4, ELY DISTRICT............................................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Jarbidge Quadrangle, Nevada-Idaho
    ~> Geology of the Jarbidge Quadrangle, Nevada-Idaho By ROBERT R. COATS , CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY \t - - ____ ~~ _____________ ~~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1141-M Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page , Abstract..--------.-_-__.--_-------------_-.--------- ----- Ml ^ Introduction-___-._-_-_-_________-_-_--_--_-_---_____-_-_------_-_ 2 General geology-_-__--_-_-__-_----___-------_----_---_------------ 3 Pre-Tertiary rocks._-_____-_-_-___-_---_-_--________----._----. 3 Precambrian(?) rocks___--_--_----_--_---_-_-___-----_----- 3 1 Prospect Mountain(?) quartzite_______._-_-.___._---_-_._-__ 4 ' Undifferentiated Paleozoic(?) sedimentary rocks.__-----_-.--__ 5 Quartz monzonite__---__--___-----_---_----_-_------------ 6 i Tertiary and Quaternary rocks.._____-_-_____-___._.--.____..--- 7 Dead Horse tuff___--_-_---_-----------._-.-_--_--------- 7 ** Meadow Fork formation____-_-_____-___---_____---_-__--_- 7 Seventy Six basalt___--_.--_ _ _.___.__.__-__-_._.-. 8 * Danger Point tuff.-_-.-.____..._______._____.. 10 Jarbidge rhyolite_--_--___-__----_---_------___-__---_-_-_- 10 Gods Pocket dacite------_-----------_-__--_____---__-_--__ 11 N Pole Creek dacite_______.------_.-.--_._.--.--._...._ 12 Slide Creek gravel___._________...___.__.....
    [Show full text]