DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2 Description of Study Site ............................................................................................................................... 2 Study Methods............................................................................................................................................... 3 Fish Collection and Tagging....................................................................................................................... 3 Habitat Sampling........................................................................................................................................ 4 PIT Tag Interrogation Systems .................................................................................................................. 5 Data Reconciliation and Analysis............................................................................................................... 5 Results of Surveys......................................................................................................................................... 6 West Fork Jarbidge River watershed ......................................................................................................... 7 East Fork Jarbidge River Watershed ......................................................................................................... 9 Overall Distribution and Abundance of Bull Trout in Jack Creek.............................................................. 12 Movements of Bull Trout .......................................................................................................................... 13 Distribution, Growth, and Movement of Bull Trout ....................................................................................... 14 General Catch Information and Population Characteristics...................................................................... 15 Movement of Bull Trout............................................................................................................................ 17 Conclusions, Summary, and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 20 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................... 21 References .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Appendix table and figures .......................................................................................................................... 64 Figures Figure 1. Map of the East and West Forks of the Jarbidge River, Idaho and Nevada, with the locations of reported fish barriers and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag interrogations systems installed in 2006 or 2007. ..............................................................................................................25 Figure 2. Locations of fish and habitat surveys, fish barriers, and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag interrogation systems in the West Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, and its tributaries, 2006 and 2007......................................................................................................................................................26 Figure 3. Locations of fish and habitat surveys, fish barriers, and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag interrogation systems in the East Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, and its tributaries, 2006 and 2007.............................................................................................................................................27 Figure 4. Length frequency, in 2-mm increments, of all bull trout sampled in the West Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, in 2006 and 2007..................................................................................................28 Figure 5. The number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in West Fork Jarbidge River (rkm 21.5 – 30.2), Nevada, 2006 ....29 Figure 6. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in West Fork Jarbidge River (rkm 21.7 – 32.2), Nevada, 2007 ................30 Figure 7. Length frequency ,in 2-mm increments, of all bull trout sampled in Pine Creek of the West Fork Jarbidge River subbasin, Nevada in 2006 and 2007 ..................................................................31 Figure 8. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in Pine Creek (rkm 0 – 6.5), Nevada, 2006..............................................32 iii Figure 9. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in Pine Creek (rkm 0 – 5.9), Nevada, 2007..................................33 Figure 10. Length frequency in 2-mm increments of all bull trout sampled in Jack Creek of the West Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, in 2006 and 2007 ................................................................................34 Figure 11. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in Jack Creek (rkm 0 – 4.3), Nevada, 2006 .................................35 Figure 12. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter, by size class, for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in Jack Creek (rkm 0 – 5.4), Nevada, 2007 .................................36 Figure 13. Length frequency in 2-mm increments of all bull trout sampled in the East Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, in 2006 and 2007. Sampling effort is not the same for each year.........................37 Figure 14. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in East Fork Jarbidge River (rkm 15.6 – 24.7), Nevada, 2006 ............................................................................................................................................................38 Figure 15. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with altitude (upper graph) and the number of bull trout and redband trout (RBT) per meter by size class in pools only (lower graph) in East Fork Jarbidge River (rkm 32.5 – 35.0), Nevada, 2007 .....39 Figure 16. Length frequency in 2-mm increments of all bull trout sampled in Cougar Creek, Nevada, and an unnamed tributary of the East Fork Jarbidge River, Nevada, at rkm 33.5 (measured from the confluence with the West Fork Jarbidge River, Idaho), 2007.......................................40 Figure 17. Number of bull trout (BLT) per meter by size class for all habitat units sampled along with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12. Owyhee Uplands Section
    12. Owyhee Uplands Section Section Description The Owyhee Uplands Section is part of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion. The Idaho portion, the subject of this review, comprises southwestern Idaho from the lower Payette River valley in the northwest and the Camas Prairie in the northeast, south through the Hagerman Valley and Salmon Falls Creek Drainage (Fig. 12.1, Fig. 12.2). The Owyhee Uplands spans a 1,200 to 2,561 m (4,000 to 8,402 ft) elevation range. This arid region generally receives 18 to 25 cm (7 to 10 in) of annual precipitation at lower elevations. At higher elevations, precipitation falls predominantly during the winter and often as snow. The Owyhee Uplands has the largest human population of any region in Idaho, concentrated in a portion of the section north of the Snake River—the lower Boise and lower Payette River valleys, generally referred to as the Treasure Valley. This area is characterized by urban and suburban development as well as extensive areas devoted to agricultural production of crops for both human and livestock use. Among the conservation issues in the Owyhee Uplands include the ongoing conversion of agricultural lands to urban and suburban development, which limits wildlife habitat values. In addition, the conversion of grazing land used for ranching to development likewise threatens wildlife habitat. Accordingly, the maintenance of opportunity for economically viable Lower Deep Creek, Owyhee Uplands, Idaho © 2011 Will Whelan ranching operations is an important consideration in protecting open space. The aridity of this region requires water management programs, including water storage, delivery, and regulation for agriculture, commercial, and residential uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout
    Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout #35 JARBIDGE clamper year 6019 Brought to you by Julia C. Bulette chapter 1864, E Clampus Vitus Researched and interpreted by Jeffrey D. Johnson XNGH, Clamphistorian at chapter 1864 Envisioned by Noble Grand Humbug Bob Stransky Dedicated to Young Golddigging Widders and Old Orphans 2014 c.e. Why Why yes, Jarbidge is a ''fer piece'' from any place. This year's junk trip has the unique quirk that it is not in the Great Basin like the rest of our territory. Northern Elko County is drained by the tributaries of the Owyhee, Bruneau and Jarbidge Rivers. They flow in to the Snake River and out to the sea. To the South the range is drained by the North Fork of the Humboldt and in the East, St. Mary's River. Geology The North American Continental plate moves at a rate of one inch a year in a Southwesterly direction. Underneath the plate is a volcanic hotspot or mantle plume. 10 to 12 million years ago the hotspot was just North of the Idaho border. Over that time it has moved, leaving a trail of volcanic debris and ejectamenta from McDermitt Nevada, East. Now the Yellowstone Caldera area is over the plume. During the middle and late Miocene, a sequence of ash flows, enormous lava flows and basalt flows from 40 odd shield volcanoes erupted from the Bruneau-Jarbidge caldera. The eruptive center has mostly been filled in by lava flows and lacustrine and fluvial sediments. Two hundred Rhinos, five different species of horse, three species of cameloids, saber tooth deer and other fauna at Ashfall Fossil Beds 1000 miles downwind to the East in Nebraska, were killed by volcanic ash from the Bruneau Jarbidge Caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge Mountains (Updated 2014)
    Site Description Jarbidge Mountains (updated 2014) Geologic setting: The Jarbidge Mountains are located within the northeastern portion of Elko County, Nevada. The small mountain range is located between the Copper Mountains to the west and the Snake mountains to the east and southeast. Basement rocks of the Jarbidge quadrangle include schist, quartzite, hornfels, and limestones. These are intruded by a Cretaceous quartz monzonite stock. The basement rocks are displaced along pre-Cretaceous faults. Cambrian and Precambrian rocks are thrust over and upon Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. The early Tertiary volcanics and conglomerates are displaced along normal faults represented by the Copper Creek fault, which dips gently east. The Jarbidge Rhyolite (Miocene) and all older formations are displaced along three sets of faults that dip steeply: one set strikes northward, one northeast, and one northwest. These three sets of faults are locally mineralized (Smith, 1976). The oldest exposures are sedimentary deposits such as limestones and shale towards the western portion of the area (Scott, 1910). Geothermal features: Gray Rock Mine: The Great Basin Groundwater Geochemical Database lists a measurement of 26.7°C in an abandoned mineshaft well in the Gray Rock Mine (Sec. 24, T45N, R58E). Robinson Hole Hot Spring / Murphy Hot Spring / Kitties Hot Hole: (Sec. 29, T47N, R59E) The first acknowledged proprietor was Kittie Wilkins, who diverted river water to create the Kittie’s Hot Hole soaking pool (1885). Patrick Murphy developed a small resort on the property in the early 1900’s and renamed it Murphy Hot Spring, followed by Harry Showalter, who added a swimming pool and changing rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Combined Travel
    Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.1. Introduction This chapter summarizes the physical, biological, social, and economic environments that are affected by the alternatives and the effects on that environment that would result from implementation of any of the alternatives. This chapter also presents the scientif ic and analyt ical basis for comparison of the alternatives presented in chapter 2. 3.1.1. Analysis Process Most of the data used in the following analysis are from the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest corporate GIS layers. There is a certain amount of error in the location and alignments included in this GIS data. For example, the road layer overlying the stream layer may show more stream crossings than actually exist on the ground because of the different sources from which the different layers were obtained. Some perennial streams may show up on the map as being intermittent. This may also create some inaccuracies as to the exact location and extent of riparian zones. The Forest is constantly working to improve map accuracies and the corporate GIS layers. For the purposes of this analysis, the best data that is available was used. The data in the tables below and in the project record depict with a reasonable amount of accuracy what would be occurring on the ground for each alternative, within the limitations described above. The changes between alternatives remain relative to each other. 3.1.2. Cumulative Effects According to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) National Environmental Protection Ac t (NEPA) regulations, “cumulative impact” is the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions (40 CFR 1508.7).
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Jarbidge River Bull Trout Project
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes, Rivers & Hot Springs
    LAKES, RIVERS & HOT SPRINGS Idaho has some of the most impressive water in the nation, and several of the state’s claims to fame are located in Southwest Idaho. Writers covering adventure, family and nature travel will find uncrowded, accessible lakes, rivers and hot springs in Southwest Idaho. RIVERS Multiple sections of the Payette River and Salmon River LAKES & RESERVOIRS are world-famous whitewater destinations. Watch the Southwest Idaho is a water recreation mecca. The area pros during the North Fork Championships or try for has dozens of reservoirs and lakes, including but not yourself with Cascade Raft & Kayak. limited to: Anderson Ranch, Arrowrock, C.J. Strike, Lake The mighty Snake River runs through Southwest Idaho, Cascade, Deadwood, Lucky Peak, Black Canyon and nourishing a massive agriculture and wine region. The river Payette Lake. turns north at the Oregon-Idaho border and runs through These bodies of water are the perfect place to take the Hells Canyon, the deepest river gorge in North America. boat out for the day. Spend an afternoon on Payette Lake Experience the impressive canyon on a whitewater on a McCall Lake Cruise. Go paddleboarding on clean, raft or jet boat tour with Hells Canyon Adventures or glacial water. Fish year-round in Southwest Idaho — Hells Canyon Raft. You’re sure to see wildlife in Hells it’s one of the only places this far inland where you can Canyon, including bald eagles, raptors, coyotes and bears. catch steelhead and salmon. The Owyhee River and Jarbidge River are perhaps two of the most remote, uncharted waters in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Status of Bull Trout in the Jarbidge River Drainage, Idaho
    EVALUATION OF THE STATUS OF BULL TROUT IN THE JARBIDGE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO by Charles D. Warren and Fred E. Partridge Idaho Department of Fish and Game Region 4 Jerome, Idaho 83338 IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 93-1 FEBRUARY 1 9 9 3 EVALUATION OF THE STATUS OF BULL TROUT IN THE JARBIDGE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO Challenge Cost Share Project ID013-435206-25-9Z Charles D. Warren Regional Fishery Biologist and Fred E. Partridge Regional Fishery Manager Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1992 Prepared for the Boise District Bureau of Land Management ABSTRACT In an effort to gather information on bull trout Salvelinus confluentus on the Jarbidge River system within Idaho, habitat and fish communities were assessed at 19 sites on the river and its tributaries. Fish sampling was by either electrofishing or snorkel observations to assess population densities and age structures. Streambed composition, water column habitat, and stream width were evaluated for habitat. Fish sampling resulted in no bull trout, although a self sustaining population of wild redband/rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss spp, whitefish Prosopium williamsoni, four cyprinid, one cottid, and one catastomid species were found. Habitat and water temperature assessments indicate that bull trout may be limited by excessive water temperatures which were intensified by the recent drought conditions. Bull trout were last observed in Idaho by Department personnel in 1991 and one incidental observation was reported during 1992. Research in Nevada sampled bull trout in 1992. 1 INTRODUCTION The only native char in Idaho and Nevada is the bull trout Salvelinus confluentus.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafting Group Enjoying the Grand Canyon Scenery
    Rafting group enjoying the BLAINE HARINGTON III/CORBIS Grand Canyon scenery 76 EXECUTIVE TRAVEL October 2010 11739 DNA Brand Mechanics Executive Travel • October 2010 PAGE 76 8.0” x 10.5” • PDF/X-1a • 133 lpi • Epson Comm Stock BY CARI GRAY oaring over deep blue glaciers, a chartered plane from Vancouver ew nine of us north to the headwaters of To get started rafting, try a day trip: ey’re available on rivers in Chilko Lake. is was the start of my rafting trip: a high- more than 20 states, including Pennsylvania, Oregon, Alaska and end whitewater ride down the remote Chilko, Chilcotin Utah. Sign up with an out tter that’s properly accredited by such Sand Fraser Rivers. By day, we experienced British Columbia’s organizations as British Columbia’s BCROA and Idaho’s IOGA. majestic old-growth alpine forests, paddling through narrow hoodoo e out tter should provide you with the right gear for the river: rock-lined canyons and relaxing on beaches. At a lifejacket, a dry bag or a locker for your personal night, we enjoyed a glass or two of Okanagan Filet mignon gear, and a wetsuit if the water is cold. Depending Valley’s nest wine or a local Kokanee beer while prepared shoreside on the river, you may opt for a more stable dory tucking into such delicacies as marinated grilled boat or an in atable raft. Experienced rafters avoid salmon llet and rotini primavera, followed by wearing cotton clothing in favor of synthetic eece chocolate fondue with fresh fruit. or wool.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the Wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2004 Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia Joshua W. Burnim The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Burnim, Joshua W., "Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia" (2004). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3484. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3484 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature; On Date; hk jbH Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with tiie author's exphcit consent. 8/98 SAWTOOTHS TO SELKIRKS CONNECTING THE WILD IN IDAHO, MONTANA, AND BRITISH COLUMBIA by Joshua Bumim B.A. Colgate University, 1996 presented in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The University of Montana May 2004 Approved by: 'pLcTl trv\ irperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number EP36026 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus) Cover Illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Bull trout. Photograph by Bart Gamett Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office Boise, Idaho Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. E-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ................................................ E-2 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ............................................. E-10 Ongoing Upper Snake Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ............................. E-19 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ....................................................................................... E-20 Recovery Measures Narrative .................................................................................................... E-21 Implementation Schedule for the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ................................................. E-55 References .................................................................................................................................. E-84 Appendix I. Core Area Summaries ........................................................................................... E-87 Appendix II. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation
    [Show full text]