Jarbidge River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jarbidge River Jarbidge River General Information The headwaters of the Jarbidge River are in northeast Nevada on the Humbolt National Forest. The river flows northward into Idaho and confluences with the Bruneau River. The study area is about a 5,600 ft length of river at the U. S. Geological Survey gaging station (13162225), which is located about 1 mi. downstream of Jarbidge, Nevada. The gage site is at an elevation of about 6,050 ft. The drainage area upstream of the gaging station is 30.6 mi2 and the geology of the watershed is predominantly volcanic extrusive (rhyolite). This U.S. Geological Survey gage was installed in April of 1998. Streamflow records are available from April 22, 1998 to present (Water Year 2012). Sediment transport measurements are available for water years 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2002. Additional information collected at the site includes a survey of a stream reach and pebble counts of the surface bed material. Figures 1 and 2 show photographs of the surveyed reach. Figure 1. Jarbidge River looking downstream near the middle of the surveyed reach. Figure 2. Jarbidge River looking downstream at the lower portion of the surveyed reach. Streamflow records are available beginning on April 22, 1998. As of December 2012 the gage was still in operation. The average annual streamflow (Qa) for the period of record is 35.4 ft3/s (15.7 in). During the period of record, daily mean discharges ranged from 1.0 ft3/s to 633 ft3/s. The highest instantaneous discharge recorded was 1230 ft3/s on May 16, 2005. Page |2 Channel Profile and Cross-Section The surveyed river segment is about a 580 ft reach beginning about 0.6 miles downstream of the USGS gage. Figure 3 shows the longitudinal profile for the channel bed in the center of the channel, the water surface elevations along each bank at the time of the survey and bankfull flow elevations (floodplains). The average gradient for the surveyed reach is 0.0160 ft/ft. Cross-sections of the channel were surveyed at three locations. Figure 4 shows the channel cross-section (XS26) near the middle of the surveyed reach. 98 Water Surface Elevation Right Bank 96 Jarbidge River Center of Channel Bed Elevation Water Surface Elevation Left Bank 94 Bankfull Elevation Right Side Bankfull Elevation Left Side 92 90 XS25 Elevation, ft XS26 88 XS27 USFS Gage 86 84 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Distance, ft Figure 3. Longitudinal profile of the surveyed reach of the Jarbidge River. 100 99 Jarbidge River 98 Cross-Section 26 97 96 95 Elevation, ft 94 Q 93 92 Q - water surface at time of survey 91 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Distance, ft Figure 4. Cross-section 26 of the Jarbidge River. Page |3 Channel Geometry Station geometry relationships (Figure 5) are shown for two sediment transport measurement areas. In 1998 most sediment transport measurements were made 100 to 150 ft upstream of the gage. In subsequent years, most measurements were made 10 to 50 ft downstream of the USGS gage. During high streamflows, sediment transport is measured from the bridge, about 10 to 20 ft downstream of the gage. Information from stream discharge measurements for 1998 through 2002, that spanned the range of discharges during which sediment transport was measured, were used to develop the power relationships. Over the range of discharges when sediment transport was measured (49.2 to 420 ft3/s), estimated stream width, estimated average depth and estimated average velocity vary from 28.8 to 37.5 ft, 0.77 to 1.80 ft, and 2.21 to 6.21 ft/s, respectively, at the upstream site and from 28.9 to 47.2 ft, 0.77 to 1.47 ft, and 2.21 to 6.05 ft/s, respectively, at the downstream site. 100 10 Jarbidge River Width 0.122 Width y = 17.933x 0.228 2 y = 11.901x R = 0.51 2 10 R = 0.69 Average Velocity y = 0.356x0.469 R2 = 0.94 Average Velocity y = 0.3399x0.481 R2 = 0.91 Width and Depth, ft 1 Average Depth Average Velocity, ft/s y = 0.2361x0.303 Average Depth R2 = 0.94 y = 0.1645x0.396 R2 = 0.89 Upstream Site Downstream Site 0.1 1 10 100 1000 3 Discharge,Discharge ft ft3/s /s Figure 5. Width, average depth, and average velocity versus stream discharge for the two sediment transport measurement sites on the Jarbidge River. Page |4 Channel Material A surface pebble count was made in the surveyed reach at cross-section 26 in October 1998. Additional surface pebble counts were made along three transects in October 2000 in a 200 ft. reach, beginning about 200 ft. upstream of the USGS gage. The average D50 and D90 for the surface material were 95 mm and 223 mm, respectively, in 1998 and 89 mm and 209 mm, in 2000 (Figure 6). About 5% (2000) of the surface material was sand (2 mm) size or smaller. 100 Jarbidge River 90 80 70 60 50 Percent Finer 40 30 Downstream Transect Upstream Transect Middle Transect 20 10 Surface 2000 Surface 1998 0 1 10 100 1000 Particle Size, mm Figure 6. Particle size distribution for surface material collected in the Jarbidge River. Page |5 Sediment Transport Sediment transport measurements were made in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2002. The sediment transport data include 56 measurements of bedload transport and 28 measurements of suspended sediment. Sediment transport measurements spanned a 3 3 range of stream discharges from 49.2 ft /s (1.12Qa) to 420 ft /s (9.55Qa). Bedload transport ranged from 0.0132 to 39.6 t/d and suspended sediment transport ranged from 0.373 to 76.7 t/d. Over the range of measured discharges, suspended transport accounts for the majority of the material in transport (Figure 7). At the lowest measure discharges predicted suspended transport is about four times that of bedload and at the highest measured discharge about 1.3 times. 100 Jarbidge River 10 1 Suspended y = 6E-06x2.661 R2 = 0.84 Total Bedload y = 2E-07x3.177 2 Sediment Transport, tons/day R = 0.59 0.1 Q a Suspended Total Bedload 0.01 10 100 1000 Discharge, ft3/s Figure 7. Bedload and suspended load transport rate versus discharge. (The bias correction factors for bedload and suspended load transport are 1.925 and 1.168, respectively.) Page |6 The bedload transport rates by size class (Figure 8) shows that the larger rates are associated with material in the 0.5 to 2mm diameter size class. Only 13 samples contained material >32mm diameter and associated discharges were greater than 126 ft3/s. 100 Jarbidge River 10 <0.5mm y = 5E-08x2.932 R2 = 0.64 1 0.5-2mm y = 3E-07x2.93 R2 = 0.60 0.1 2-8mm 3.211 Bedload Rate, tons/day y = 4E-08x R2 = 0.56 <0.5mm 0.01 0.5-2mm 8-32mm 2-8mm y = 3E-07x2.710 8-32mm R2 = 0.33 Qa >32mm 0.001 10 100 1000 Discharge, ft3/s Figure 8. Bedload transport rate versus discharge for selected size classes. Page |7 The size of the largest particle size class in the bedload sample typically increased with discharge (Figure 9). The largest particle size class in a bedload sample was 32 to 3 64 mm at discharges of 126 ft /s and larger. The D50 exhibits a weak relationship with discharge. The D50 for the majority of the samples was <2 mm. The largest D50 was 35.4 mm associated with a sampling discharge of 126 ft3/s. The information on the largest particle size class in the bedload sample suggests that discharges larger than the sampled discharges would be needed to transport the median diameter particles on the channel surface. 1000 Jarbidge River Median Size Lower end of largest size class D50 for the three 100 surface pebble counts in 2000 10 Bedload Size, mm R2 = 0.46 1 R2 = 0.06 Qa 0.1 10 100 1000 Discharge, ft3/s Figure 9. Lower end of the largest size class in the bedload sample and median size of the sample versus stream discharge for the Jarbidge River. Page |8 .
Recommended publications
  • 12. Owyhee Uplands Section
    12. Owyhee Uplands Section Section Description The Owyhee Uplands Section is part of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion. The Idaho portion, the subject of this review, comprises southwestern Idaho from the lower Payette River valley in the northwest and the Camas Prairie in the northeast, south through the Hagerman Valley and Salmon Falls Creek Drainage (Fig. 12.1, Fig. 12.2). The Owyhee Uplands spans a 1,200 to 2,561 m (4,000 to 8,402 ft) elevation range. This arid region generally receives 18 to 25 cm (7 to 10 in) of annual precipitation at lower elevations. At higher elevations, precipitation falls predominantly during the winter and often as snow. The Owyhee Uplands has the largest human population of any region in Idaho, concentrated in a portion of the section north of the Snake River—the lower Boise and lower Payette River valleys, generally referred to as the Treasure Valley. This area is characterized by urban and suburban development as well as extensive areas devoted to agricultural production of crops for both human and livestock use. Among the conservation issues in the Owyhee Uplands include the ongoing conversion of agricultural lands to urban and suburban development, which limits wildlife habitat values. In addition, the conversion of grazing land used for ranching to development likewise threatens wildlife habitat. Accordingly, the maintenance of opportunity for economically viable Lower Deep Creek, Owyhee Uplands, Idaho © 2011 Will Whelan ranching operations is an important consideration in protecting open space. The aridity of this region requires water management programs, including water storage, delivery, and regulation for agriculture, commercial, and residential uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Jarbidge River Bull Trout Project
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes, Rivers & Hot Springs
    LAKES, RIVERS & HOT SPRINGS Idaho has some of the most impressive water in the nation, and several of the state’s claims to fame are located in Southwest Idaho. Writers covering adventure, family and nature travel will find uncrowded, accessible lakes, rivers and hot springs in Southwest Idaho. RIVERS Multiple sections of the Payette River and Salmon River LAKES & RESERVOIRS are world-famous whitewater destinations. Watch the Southwest Idaho is a water recreation mecca. The area pros during the North Fork Championships or try for has dozens of reservoirs and lakes, including but not yourself with Cascade Raft & Kayak. limited to: Anderson Ranch, Arrowrock, C.J. Strike, Lake The mighty Snake River runs through Southwest Idaho, Cascade, Deadwood, Lucky Peak, Black Canyon and nourishing a massive agriculture and wine region. The river Payette Lake. turns north at the Oregon-Idaho border and runs through These bodies of water are the perfect place to take the Hells Canyon, the deepest river gorge in North America. boat out for the day. Spend an afternoon on Payette Lake Experience the impressive canyon on a whitewater on a McCall Lake Cruise. Go paddleboarding on clean, raft or jet boat tour with Hells Canyon Adventures or glacial water. Fish year-round in Southwest Idaho — Hells Canyon Raft. You’re sure to see wildlife in Hells it’s one of the only places this far inland where you can Canyon, including bald eagles, raptors, coyotes and bears. catch steelhead and salmon. The Owyhee River and Jarbidge River are perhaps two of the most remote, uncharted waters in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Status of Bull Trout in the Jarbidge River Drainage, Idaho
    EVALUATION OF THE STATUS OF BULL TROUT IN THE JARBIDGE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO by Charles D. Warren and Fred E. Partridge Idaho Department of Fish and Game Region 4 Jerome, Idaho 83338 IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 93-1 FEBRUARY 1 9 9 3 EVALUATION OF THE STATUS OF BULL TROUT IN THE JARBIDGE RIVER DRAINAGE, IDAHO Challenge Cost Share Project ID013-435206-25-9Z Charles D. Warren Regional Fishery Biologist and Fred E. Partridge Regional Fishery Manager Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1992 Prepared for the Boise District Bureau of Land Management ABSTRACT In an effort to gather information on bull trout Salvelinus confluentus on the Jarbidge River system within Idaho, habitat and fish communities were assessed at 19 sites on the river and its tributaries. Fish sampling was by either electrofishing or snorkel observations to assess population densities and age structures. Streambed composition, water column habitat, and stream width were evaluated for habitat. Fish sampling resulted in no bull trout, although a self sustaining population of wild redband/rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss spp, whitefish Prosopium williamsoni, four cyprinid, one cottid, and one catastomid species were found. Habitat and water temperature assessments indicate that bull trout may be limited by excessive water temperatures which were intensified by the recent drought conditions. Bull trout were last observed in Idaho by Department personnel in 1991 and one incidental observation was reported during 1992. Research in Nevada sampled bull trout in 1992. 1 INTRODUCTION The only native char in Idaho and Nevada is the bull trout Salvelinus confluentus.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafting Group Enjoying the Grand Canyon Scenery
    Rafting group enjoying the BLAINE HARINGTON III/CORBIS Grand Canyon scenery 76 EXECUTIVE TRAVEL October 2010 11739 DNA Brand Mechanics Executive Travel • October 2010 PAGE 76 8.0” x 10.5” • PDF/X-1a • 133 lpi • Epson Comm Stock BY CARI GRAY oaring over deep blue glaciers, a chartered plane from Vancouver ew nine of us north to the headwaters of To get started rafting, try a day trip: ey’re available on rivers in Chilko Lake. is was the start of my rafting trip: a high- more than 20 states, including Pennsylvania, Oregon, Alaska and end whitewater ride down the remote Chilko, Chilcotin Utah. Sign up with an out tter that’s properly accredited by such Sand Fraser Rivers. By day, we experienced British Columbia’s organizations as British Columbia’s BCROA and Idaho’s IOGA. majestic old-growth alpine forests, paddling through narrow hoodoo e out tter should provide you with the right gear for the river: rock-lined canyons and relaxing on beaches. At a lifejacket, a dry bag or a locker for your personal night, we enjoyed a glass or two of Okanagan Filet mignon gear, and a wetsuit if the water is cold. Depending Valley’s nest wine or a local Kokanee beer while prepared shoreside on the river, you may opt for a more stable dory tucking into such delicacies as marinated grilled boat or an in atable raft. Experienced rafters avoid salmon llet and rotini primavera, followed by wearing cotton clothing in favor of synthetic eece chocolate fondue with fresh fruit. or wool.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the Wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2004 Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia Joshua W. Burnim The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Burnim, Joshua W., "Sawtooths to Selkirks| Connecting the wild in Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia" (2004). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3484. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3484 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature; On Date; hk jbH Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with tiie author's exphcit consent. 8/98 SAWTOOTHS TO SELKIRKS CONNECTING THE WILD IN IDAHO, MONTANA, AND BRITISH COLUMBIA by Joshua Bumim B.A. Colgate University, 1996 presented in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The University of Montana May 2004 Approved by: 'pLcTl trv\ irperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number EP36026 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus) Cover Illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Bull trout. Photograph by Bart Gamett Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office Boise, Idaho Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. E-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ................................................ E-2 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ............................................. E-10 Ongoing Upper Snake Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ............................. E-19 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ....................................................................................... E-20 Recovery Measures Narrative .................................................................................................... E-21 Implementation Schedule for the Upper Snake Recovery Unit ................................................. E-55 References .................................................................................................................................. E-84 Appendix I. Core Area Summaries ........................................................................................... E-87 Appendix II. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Watershed Analysis
    JARBIDGE RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS JARBIDGE RANGER DISTRICT HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FORESTS ANALYSIS CORE TEAM: MICHAEL E. MCNEILL, TEAM LEADER JAY FREDERICK, BIOLOGIST BONNIE WHALEN, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST TEAMMEMBERS: Chris Butler, Hydrologist Fred Frampton, Archaeologist Kathy Ramsey, Fish Biologist· Additional Inputprovided by: Gary Johnson, Nevada Division of Wildlife, Region II Jim K1ott, Jarbidge Resource Area, Idaho .BLM Bruce ZoeUick,Idaho State BLM JARBIDGE CANYON WATERSHED ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED Introduction . Page 1-1 Physical Setting Page 1-2 Geology Page 1-3 Soils Page 1-4 Disturbance Page 1-5 Biological Processes and Human Influence Page 1-5 CHAPTER TWO - /DENT/FICA T/ON OF ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS Key Questions Page 2-1 CHAPTER THREE - DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS Stream Order Page 3-1 Hydrologic Regime Page 3-1 Headwater Morphology Page 3-1 Valley Bottom Morphology Page 3-1 Channel Morphology Page 3-2 Substrate Page Width/Depth Ratio Page 3-5 Pools and large Wood 3-5 Water Quality· Page 3-7 Heavy Metals Page 3-7 Temperature Page 3-7 Other Water Quality Concerns Page 3-10 Soils Page 3-10 Vegetation Page 3-10 Riparian Vegetation Page 3-12 Macros Page 3-12 CHAPTER FOUR - DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE CONDITIONS Biological Processes and Human Influence . Page 4-1 Beaver Page 4-1 Livestock Page 4-2 Mining Page 4-5 Mining and Water quality Page 4-5 Temperature Page 4-6 Roads Page 4-6 Vegetation Page 4-7 Channel Morphology Page 4-8 CHAPTER FIVE - SYNTHESIS AND INTERPRETATION OF INFORMATION Summary Page 5.1 CHAPTER SIX - RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations Page 6.1 Data Shortcomings Page 6.2 DATA CHARTS AND GIS OVERLAYS Data Charts: Geologic Formations Figure 1.2' Valley Boltom Gradient Figure 3.1 Stream Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Jarbidge Population of Bull Trout
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]